Universal Large-Deviation Function of the Kardar–Parisi–Zh ...
Casimir forces, surface fluctuations, and thinning of superfluid films Mehran Kardar (MIT)
description
Transcript of Casimir forces, surface fluctuations, and thinning of superfluid films Mehran Kardar (MIT)
Casimir forces, surface fluctuations, and thinning of
superfluid films
Mehran Kardar (MIT)
Roya Zandi
Joseph Rudnick (UCLA)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 155302 (2004)
Superfluid transition
Question: Why are films thinner in the superfluid state?
Normalfluid
Superfluid
The film is thinner at the transition, and in the superfluid phase
4He thin film experimentsR. Garcia and M.H.W. Chan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1187 (1999)
Casimir effect
Quantum fluctuations of the EM field between conducting plates in vacuum results in long-ranged forces
Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 51, 793 (1948)
• Normal modes of Electro-Magnetic field between plates:
€
H
• The ground state energy of quantized normal modes:
•An attractive force between plates:
Finite-size effects at Criticality• Analogs in Statistical Mechanics
• Phase diagrams:
• Free energy of the long-wavelength fluctuations:
M.E. Fisher and P.-G. de Gennes, C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. B 287, 207 (1978)
M.E. Fisher + P.-G. de Gennes, C. R. Acad. Sci.Ser. B 287, 207 (1978)
€
δF(H) = −kBT ×A
H 2× c
C
Superfluid Helium
• Superfluid He has “massless” Goldstone modes (phonons) associated with the phase of the quantum condenstae.
• The interaction resulting from (thermal) fluctuations of these modes is
H. Li and M. Kardar, PRL 67, 3275 (1991); PRA 46, 6490 (1992)
temp
Pressure
superfluid
fluid
gas
C
€
H φ[ ] =K
2d3x(∇φ)2∫
€
δF(H) = −kBT ×A
H 2×
ζ (3)
16π
Wetting by a Superfluid film• R. Garcia and M.H.W. Chan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1187 (1999).
• Question: What determines the thickness of the wetting layer?
dHe (vapor)
He (liquid)
Thinning of a Superfluid film
• Thickness of the wetting film is obtained by minimizing
• The film is thinner at the transition, and in the superfluid phase
• The observed thinning of the film is larger than can be accounted by the Casimir forces associated with Goldstone modes.
d
h He (vapor)
He (liquid)
€
E(d) = A ghd +Cvdw − CCas
d2
⎡ ⎣ ⎢
⎤ ⎦ ⎥,⇒ d =
2(Cvdw − CCas)
gh
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
1/ 3
€
Ccas = 0
€
CcasCritical€
Ccas =
Goldstone
modes + ?
• Normal fluid is clamped due to viscosity
• Superfluid films have a velocity field associated with the superfluid phase
• Kinetic energy
• Free energy associated with superfluid flow
Surface fluctuations
€
d3r1
2ρ sv
2 =∫ Pk
2 k tanhkd
2ρ sr k
∑
€
φ
• Dzyaloshinskii, Lifshitz, Pitaevskii (1961)
• Mahale and Cole (1986)
• Not a Helfrich interaction which is repulsive
Thinning of a Superfluid film
• Casimir force due to surface fluctuations
• Total Casimir force:€
Fsurface = −7
4
kBT
8π
ξ (3)
d3=
7
4FGoldstone
€
Fcasimir = Fsurface + FGoldstone ≅ −0.15
d3kBT
M. Krech Ueno & Balibar (2004)
Summary
• Bulk Goldstone modes + surface fluctuations suffice to explain the excess thinning of the film in the superfluid region.
Future work
• Effect of surface fluctuations at--and especially immediately below--the superfluid transition