Cases in Sales

9
Velarde vs. Court of Appeals (361 SCRA 57) FACTS: The private respondent executed a Deed of Sale with Assumption of Mortgage, with a balance of P1.8 million, in favor of the petitioners. Pursuant to said agreements, plaintiffs paid the bank (BPI) for three (3) months until they were advised that the Application for Assumption of Mortgage was denied. This prompted the plaintiffs not to make any further payment. Private respondent wrote the petitioners informing the non-fulfillment of the obligations. Petitioners, thru counsel responded that they are willing to pay in cash the balance subject to several conditions. Private respondents sent a notarial notice of cancellation/rescission of the Deed of Sale. Petitioners filed a complaint which was consequently dismissed by an outgoing judge but was reversed by the assuming judge in their Motion for Reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reinstated the decision to dismiss. ISSUE: Whether or not there is a substantial breach of contract that would entitle its rescission. RULING: YES. Article 1191 of the New Civil Code applies. The breach committed did not merely consist of a slight delay in payment or an irregularity; such breach would not normally defeat the intention of the parties to the contract. Here, petitioners not only failed to pay the P1.8 million balance, but they also imposed upon private respondents new obligations as preconditions to the performance of their own obligation. In effect, the qualified offer to pay was a repudiation of an existing obligation, which was legally due and demandable under the contract of sale. Hence, private respondents were left with the legal option of seeking rescission to protect their own interest. G.R. No. L-9935 February 1, 1915 YU TEK and CO., plaintiff-appellant, vs. BASILIO GONZALES, defendant-appellant.

description

Cases digests in sales

Transcript of Cases in Sales

Velarde vs. Court of Appeals (361 SCRA 57)FACTS:The private respodet e!e"uted a #eed of Sale $ith Assu%ptio of &ort'a'e( $ith a )ala"e of *1.+ %illio( i favor of the petitioers. *ursuat to said a'ree%ets( plaitiffs paid the )a, (-*.) for three (3) %oths util the/ $ere advised that the Appli"atio for Assu%ptio of &ort'a'e $as deied. This pro%pted the plaitiffs ot to%a,e a/ further pa/%et. *rivate respodet $rote the petitioers ifor%i' the o0fulfill%et of the o)li'atios. *etitioers( thru "ousel respoded that the/ are $illi' to pa/ i "ash the )ala"e su)1e"t to several "oditios. *rivate respodets set a otarial oti"e of "a"ellatio2res"issio of the #eed of Sale. *etitioers filed a "o%plait $hi"h $as "ose3uetl/ dis%issed )/ a out'oi' 1ud'e )ut $as reversed )/ the assu%i' 1ud'e i their &otio for Re"osideratio. The Court of Appeals reistated the de"isio to dis%iss..SS45:6hether or ot there is a su)statial )rea"h of "otra"t that $ould etitle its res"issio.R47.89::5S. Arti"le 11;1 of the 8e$ Civil Code applies. The )rea"h "o%%itted did ot %erel/ "osist of a sli'ht dela/ i pa/%et or a irre'ularit/< su"h )rea"h $ould ot or%all/ defeat the itetio of the parties to the "otra"t. =ere( petitioers ot ol/ failed to pa/ the *1.+ %illio )ala"e( )ut the/ also i%posed upo private respodets e$ o)li'atios as pre"oditios to the perfor%a"e of their o$ o)li'atio. . effe"t( the 3ualified offer to pa/ $as a repudiatio of a e!isti' o)li'atio( $hi"h $as le'all/ due ad de%ada)le uder the "otra"t of sale. =e"e( private respodets $ere left $ith the le'al optio of see,i' res"issio to prote"t their o$ iterest.9.R. 8o. 70;;35 Fe)ruar/ 1( 1;15:4 T5> ad C?.( plaitiff0appellat( vs.-AS.7.? 9?8@A75S( defedat0appellat.-eau%ot( Tee/ ad Ferrier for plaitiff. -ue"a%io ad 7oto, for defedat.TR58T( A.:The )asis of this a"tio is a $ritte "otra"t( 5!hi)it A( the pertiet para'raphs of $hi"h follo$:1. That &r. -asilio 9oBaleB here)/ a",o$led'es re"eipt of the su% of *3(CCC *hilippie "urre"/ fro% &essrs. :u Te, ad Co.( ad that i "osideratio of said su% )e o)li'ates hi%self to deliver to the said :u Te, ad Co.( 6CC pi"uls of su'ar of the firstad se"od 'rade( a""ordi' to the result of the polariBatio( $ithi the period of three%oths( )e'ii' o the 1st da/ of Aauar/( 1;1D( ad edi' o the 31st da/ of &ar"h of the sa%e /ear( 1;1D.D. That the said &r. -asilio 9oBales o)li'ates hi%self to deliver to the said &essrs. :u Te, ad Co.( of this "it/ the said 6CC pi"uls of su'ar at a/ pla"e $ithi the said %ui"ipalit/ of Sata Rosa $hi"h the said &essrs. :u Te, ad Co.( or a represetative ofthe sa%e %a/ desi'ate.3. That i "ase the said &r. -asilio 9oBales does ot deliver to &essrs. :u Te, ad Co. the 6CC pi"uls of su'ar $ithi the period of three %oths( referred to i the se"od para'raph of this do"u%et( this "otra"t $ill )e res"ided ad the said &r. -asilio 9oBales $ill the )e o)li'ated to retur to &essrs. :u Te, ad Co. the *3(CCC re"eived ad also the su% of *1(DCC )/ $a/ of ide%it/ for loss ad da%a'es.*laitiff proved that o su'ar had )ee delivered to it uder this "otra"t or had it )ee a)le to re"over the *3(CCC. *laitiff pra/ed for 1ud'%et for the *3(CCC ad( i additio( for *1(DCC uder para'raph E( supra. Aud'%et $as redered for *3(CCC ol/(ad fro% this 1ud'%et )oth parties appealed.The poits raised )/ the defedat $ill )e "osidered first. =e alle'es that the "ourt erred i refusi' to per%it parol evide"e sho$i' that the parties iteded that the su'ar $as to )e se"ured fro% the "rop $hi"h the defedat raised o his platatio( ad that he $as ua)le to fulfill the "otra"t )/ reaso of the al%ost total failure of his "rop. This "ase appears to )e oe to $hi"h the rule $hi"h e!"ludes parol evide"e to add to or var/ the ter%s of a $ritte "otra"t is de"idedl/ appli"a)le. There is ot the sli'htest iti%atio i the "otra"t that the su'ar $as to )e raised )/ the defedat. *arties are presu%ed to have redu"ed to $riti' all the essetial "oditios of their "otra"t. 6hile parol evide"e is ad%issi)le i a variet/ of $a/s to e!plai the %eai'of $ritte "otra"ts( it "aot serve the purpose of i"orporati' ito the "otra"t additioal "ote%poraeous "oditios $hi"h are ot %etioed at all i the $riti'( uless there has )ee fraud or %ista,e. . a earl/ "ase this "ourt de"lied to allo$ parol evide"e sho$i' that a part/ to a $ritte "otra"t $as to )e"o%e a parter i a fir% istead of a "reditor of the fir%. (*astor vs. 9aspar( D *hil. Rep.( 5;D.) A'ai( i 5velad vs. 5aster &ii' Co. (1E *hil. Rep.( 5C;) a "otra"t of e%plo/%et provided that the plaitiff should re"eive fro% the defedat a stipulated salar/ ad e!peses. The defedat sou'ht to iterpose as a defese to re"over/ that the pa/%et of the salar/ $as "oti'et upo the plaitiffFs e%plo/%et redoudi' to the )eefit of thedefedat "o%pa/. The "otra"t "otaied o su"h "oditio ad the "ourt de"lied to re"eive parol evide"e thereof.. the "ase at )ar( it is sou'ht to sho$ that the su'ar $as to )e o)taied e!"lusivel/ fro% the "rop raised )/ the defedat. There is o "lause i the $ritte "otra"t $hi"h eve re%otel/ su''ests su"h a "oditio. The defedat udertoo, to deliver a spe"ified 3uatit/ of su'ar $ithi a spe"ified ti%e. The "otra"t pla"ed o restri"tio upo the defedat i the %atter of o)taii' the su'ar. =e $as e3uall/ at li)ert/ to pur"hase it o the %ar,et or raise it hi%self. .t %a/ )e true that defedat o$ed a platatio ad e!pe"ted to raise the su'ar hi%self( )ut he did ot li%it his o)li'atio tohis o$ "rop of su'ar. ?ur "o"lusio is that the "oditio $hi"h the defedat see,s to add to the "otra"t )/ parol evide"e "aot )e "osidered. The ri'hts of the parties%ust )e deter%ied )/ the $riti' itself.The se"od "otetio of the defedat arises fro% the first. =e assu%es that the "otra"t $as li%ited to the su'ar he %i'ht raise upo his o$ platatio< that the "otra"t represeted a perfe"ted sale< ad that )/ failure of his "rop he $as relieved fro% "o%pl/i' $ith his uderta,i' )/ loss of the thi' due. (Arts. 1E5D( 1C;6( ad 11+D( Civil Code.) This ar'u%et is fault/ i assu%i' that there $as a perfe"ted sale. Arti"le 1E5C defies a perfe"ted sale as follo$s:The sale shall )e perfe"ted )et$ee vedor ad vedee ad shall )e )idi' o )oth of the%( if the/ have a'reed upo the thi' $hi"h is the o)1e"t of the "otra"t ad upo the pri"e( eve $he either has )ee delivered.Arti"le 1E5D reads: GThe i1ur/ to or the profit of the thi' sold shall( after the "otra"t has )ee perfe"ted( )e 'overed )/ the provisios of arti"les 1C;6 ad 11+D.GThis "ourt has "osistetl/ held that there is a perfe"ted sale $ith re'ard to the Gthi'G $heever the arti"le of sale has )ee ph/si"all/ se're'ated fro% all other arti"les Thus(a parti"ular to)a""o fa"tor/ $ith its "otets $as held sold uder a "otra"t $hi"h did ot provide for either deliver/ of the pri"e or of the thi' util a future ti%e. &"Cullou'h vs. Aelle ad Co. (3 *hil. Rep.( D;5). Huite si%ilar $as the re"et "ase of -arretto vs. Sata &aria (D6 *hil. Rep.( DCC) $here spe"ified shares of sto", i a to)a""o fa"tor/ $ere held sold )/ a "otra"t $hi"h deferred deliver/ of )oth the pri"e ad the sto", util the latter had )ee appraised )/ a ivetor/ of the etire assets ofthe "o%pa/. . -orro%eo vs. Fra"o (5 *hil. Rep.( E;) a sale of a spe"ifi" house $as held perfe"ted )et$ee the vedor ad vedee( althou'h the deliver/ of the pri"e $as $ithheld util the e"essar/ do"u%ets of o$ership $ere prepared )/ the vedee. . Ta 7eo"o vs. 9o .3ui (+ *hil. Rep.( 531) the plaitiff had delivered a 3uatit/ of he%p ito the $arehouse of the defedat. The defedat dre$ a )ill of e!"ha'e i the su% of *+CC( represeti' the pri"e $hi"h had )ee a'reed upo for the he%p thus delivered. *rior to the presetatio of the )ill for pa/%et( the he%p $as destro/ed. 6hereupo( the defedat suspeded pa/%et of the )ill. .t $as held that the he%p havi' )ee alread/ delivered( the title had passed ad the loss $as the vedeeFs. .t is our purpose to disti'uish the "ase at )ar fro% all these "ases.. the "ase at )ar the uderta,i' of the defedat $as to sell to the plaitiff 6CC pi"uls of su'ar of the first ad se"od "lasses. 6as this a a'ree%et upo the Gthi'G $hi"h $as the o)1e"t of the "otra"t $ithi the %eai' of arti"le 1E5C( supraI Su'ar isoe of the staple "o%%odities of this "outr/. For the purpose of sale its )ul, is $ei'hed( the "usto%ar/ uit of $ei'ht )ei' deo%iated a Gpi"ul.G There $as o deliver/ uder the "otra"t. 8o$( if "alled upo to desi'ate the arti"le sold( it is "lear that the defedat "ould ol/ sa/ that it $as Gsu'ar.G =e "ould ol/ use this 'eeri" a%e for the thi' sold. There $as o GappropriatioG of a/ parti"ular lot of su'ar. 8either part/ "ould poit to a/ spe"ifi" 3uatit/ of su'ar ad sa/: GThis is the arti"le $hi"h $as the su)1e"t of our "otra"t.G =o$ differet is this fro% the "otra"ts dis"ussed i the "ases referred to a)oveJ . the &"Cullou'h "ase( for ista"e( the to)a""o fa"tor/ $hi"h the parties dealt $ith $as spe"ifi"all/ poited out ad disti'uished fro% all other to)a""o fa"tories. So( i the -arretto "ase( the parti"ular shares of sto", $hi"h the parties desired to trasfer $ere "apa)le of desi'atio. . the Ta 7eo"o "ase( $here a 3uatit/ of he%p $as the su)1e"t of the "otra"t( it $as sho$ that that 3uatit/ had )ee deposited i a spe"ifi" $arehouse( ad thus set apart ad disti'uished fro% all other he%p.A u%)er of "ases have )ee de"ided i the State of 7ouisiaa( $here the "ivil la$ prevails( $hi"h "ofir% our positio. *erhaps the latest is 6itt Shoe Co. vs. See'ars adCo. (1DD 7a.( 1E5< E7 Sou.( EEE). . this "ase a "otra"t $as etered ito )/ a traveli' sales%a for a 3uatit/ of shoes( the sales havi' )ee %ade )/ sa%ple. The "ourt said of this "otra"t:-ut it is $holl/ i%%aterial( for the purpose of the %ai 3uestio( $hether &it"hell $as authoriBed to %a,e a defiite "otra"t of sale or ot( si"e the ol/ "otra"t that he $as i a positio to %a,e $as a a'ree%et to sell or a e!e"utor/ "otra"t of sale. =esa/s that plaitiff seds out 375 sa%ples of shoes( ad as he $as offeri' to sell )/ sa%ple shoes( part of $hi"h had ot )ee %aufa"tured ad the rest of $hi"h $ere i"orporated i plaitiffFs sto", i 7/"h)ur'( Va.( it $as i%possi)le that he ad See'ars ad Co. should at that ti%e have a'reed upo the spe"ifi" o)1e"ts( the title to $hi"h $as to pass( ad he"e there "ould have )ee o sale. =e ad See'ars ad Co. %i'ht have a'reed( ad did (i effe"t ) a'ree( that the idetifi"atio of the o)1e"ts ad their appropriatio to the "otra"t e"essar/ to %a,e a sale should thereafter )e %ade)/ the plaitiff( a"ti' for itself ad for See'ars ad Co.( ad the le'ed prited i red i, o plaitiffFs )illheads (G?ur resposi)ilit/ "eases $he $e ta,e trasportatio CoFs. re"eipt K. 'ood orderFG idi"ates plaitiffFs idea of the %o%et at $hi"h su"h idetifi"atio ad appropriatio $ould )e"o%e effe"tive. The 3uestio preseted $as "arefull/ "osidered i the "ase of State vs. Shields( et al. (11C 7a.( 5E7( 3E Sou.( 673) (i$hi"h it $as a)solutel/ e"essar/ that it should )e de"ided)( ad it $as there held that i re"eivi' a order for a 3uatit/ of 'oods( of a ,id ad at a pri"e a'reed o( to )e supplied fro% a 'eeral sto",( $arehoused at aother pla"e( the a'et re"eivi' the order %erel/ eters ito a e!e"utor/ "otra"t for the sale of the 'oods( $hi"h does ot divest or trasfer the title of a/ deter%iate o)1e"t( ad $hi"h )e"o%es effe"tive for that purpose ol/ $he spe"ifi" 'oods are thereafter appropriated to the "otra"t< ad( i the a)se"e of a %ore spe"ifi" a'ree%et o the su)1e"t( that su"h appropriated ta,es pla"e ol/ $he the 'oods as ordered are delivered to the pu)li" "arriers at the pla"e fro% $hi"h the/ are to )e shipped( "osi'ed to the perso )/ $ho% the order is 'ive( at $hi"h ti%e ad pla"e( therefore( the sale is perfe"ted ad the title passes.This "ase ad State vs. Shields( referred to i the a)ove 3uotatio are a%pl/ illustrative of the positio ta,e )/ the 7ouisiaa "ourt o the 3uestio )efore us. -ut $e "aot refrai fro% referri' to the "ase of 7arue ad *revost vs. Ru'el/( -lair ad Co. (1C 7a. A.( DED) $hi"h is su%%ariBed )/ the "ourt itself i the Shields "ase as follo$s:. . . .t appears that the defedats had %ade a "otra"t for the sale( )/ $ei'ht( of a lot of "otto( had re"eived L3(CCC o a""out of the pri"e( ad had 'ive a order for its deliver/( $hi"h had )ee preseted to the pur"haser( ad re"o'iBed )/ the press i $hi"h the "otto $as stored( )ut that the "otto had )ee destro/ed )/ fire )efore it $as $ei'hed. .t $as held that it $as still at the ris, of the seller( ad that the )u/er $asetitled to re"over the L3(CCC paid o a""out of the pri"e.6e "o"lude that the "otra"t i the "ase at )ar $as %erel/ a e!e"utor/ a'ree%et< apro%ise of sale ad ot a sale. At there $as o perfe"ted sale( it is "lear that arti"les 1E5D( 1C;6( ad 11+D are ot appli"a)le. The defedat havi' defaulted i his e'a'e%et( the plaitiff is etitled to re"over the *3(CCC $hi"h it adva"ed to the defedat( ad this portio of the 1ud'%et appealed fro% %ust therefore )e affir%ed.The plaitiff has appealed fro% the 1ud'%et of the trial "ourt o the 'roud that it is etitled to re"over the additioal su% of *1(DCC uder para'raph E of the "otra"t. The"ourt )elo$ held that this para'raph $as si%pl/ a li%itatio upo the a%out of da%a'es $hi"h "ould )e re"overed ad ot li3uidated da%a'es as "ote%plated )/ the la$. G.t also appears(G said the lo$er "ourt( Gthat i a/ evet the defedat $as preveted fro% fulfilli' the "otra"t )/ the deliver/ of the su'ar )/ "oditio over $hi"h he had o "otrol( )ut these "oditios $ere ot suffi"iet to a)solve hi% fro% the o)li'atio of returi' the %oe/ $hi"h he re"eived.GThe a)ove 3uoted portio of the trial "ourtFs opiio appears to )e )ased upo the propositio that the su'ar $hi"h $as to )e delivered )/ the defedat $as that $hi"h he e!pe"ted to o)tai fro% his o$ ha"ieda ad( as the dr/ $eather destro/ed his 'ro$i' "ae( he "ould ot "o%pl/ $ith his part of the "otra"t. As $e have idi"ated( this vie$ is erroeous( as( uder the "otra"t( the defedat $as ot li%ited to his 'ro$th "rop i order to %a,e the deliver/. =e a'reed to deliver the su'ar ad othi' is said i the "otra"t a)out $here he $as to 'et it.6e thi, is a "lear "ase of li3uidated da%a'es. The "otra"t plail/ states that if the defedat fails to deliver the 6CC pi"uls of su'ar $ithi the ti%e a'reed o( the "otra"t $ill )e res"ided ad he $ill )e o)li'ed to retur the *3(CCC ad pa/ the su% of *1(DCC )/ $a/ of ide%it/ for loss ad da%a'es. There "aot )e the sli'htest dou)t a)out the %eai' of this la'ua'e or the itetio of the parties. There is o roo% for either iterpretatio or "ostru"tio. 4der the provisios of arti"le 1D55 of the Civil Code "otra"ti' parties are free to e!e"ute the "otra"ts that the/ %a/ "osider suita)le( provided the/ are ot i "otravetio of la$( %orals( or pu)li" order. . our opiio there is othi' i the "otra"t uder "osideratio $hi"h is opposed to a/ of these pri"iples.For the fore'oi' reasos the 1ud'%et appealed fro% is %odified )/ allo$i' the re"over/ of *1(DCC uder para'raph E of the "otra"t. As thus %odified( the 1ud'%et appealed fro% is affir%ed( $ithout "osts i this ista"e.Arellao( C.A.( Torres( KATIPUNAN VS. KATIPUNAN, JR.G.R. No. 132415, January 30, 2002FactsR!s"on#!nt $rau%&o Kat&"unan Jr. &s t'! r!(&st!r!# o)n!r o* a %ot an# a *&+!,#oor a"art-!nt construct!# t'!r!on, )'&c' )!r! occu"&!# .y %!ss!!s. R!s"on#!nt ass&st!# .y '&s .rot'!r "!t&t&on!r /&(u!% !nt!r!# &nto a 0!!# o* A.so%ut! Sa%! )&t' .rot'!rs 1#ar#o $a%(u-a an# 2!o"o%#o $a%(u-a, Jr. 3 co,"!t&t&on!rs4, r!"r!s!nt!# .y t'!&r %a)y!r,*at'!r &n+o%+&n( t'! su.5!ct "ro"!rty *or a cons!rat&on o* P167,000.00. So, t'! t&t%! )as r!(&st!r!# &n t'! na-!s o* t'! $a%(u-a .rot'!rs an# t'!y start!# co%%!ct&n( r!nta%s t'!r!on.2at!r, $rau%&o *&%!# a co-"%a&nt *or annu%-!nt o* t'! 0!!# o* A.so%ut! Sa%!, cont!n#&n( t'at '&s .rot'!r /&(u!%, Atty. $a%(u-a an# Inoc!nc&o Va%#!8 3 on! o* t'! "!t&t&on!rs4 con+&nc!# '&- to )or9 a.roa#. T'rou(' &ns&ous )or#s an# -ac'&nat&ons, t'!y -a#! '&- s&(n a #ocu-!nt "ur"ort!#%y a contract o* !-"%oy-!nt, )'&c' #ocu-!nt turn!# out to .! a 0!!# o* A.so%ut! Sa%!. :! *urt'!r a%%!(!# t'at '! # not r!c!&+! t'! cons!rat&on stat!# &n t'! contract. :! c%a&-!# t'at t'!r! )as !+!nt .a# *a&t' an# cons"&racy &n ta9&n( a#+anta(! o* '&s &(noranc!, '! .!&n( on%y a t'&r# (ra#!r.T'! RT; #&s-&ss!# t'! co-"%a&nt .!caus! $rau%&o *a&%!# to "ro+! '&s caus! o* act&on s&nc! '! a#-&tt!# t'at '! o.ta&n!# %oans *ro- t'! $a%(u-as, '! s&(n!# t'! 0!!# o* A.so%ut! Sa%!, an# '! ac9no)%!#(!# s!%%&n( t'! "ro"!rty an# sto""!# co%%!ct&n( t'! r!nta%s. $ut )'!n t'! cas! )as !%!+at!#, t'! #!c&s&on o* RT; )as r!+!rs!# an# &t )as '!%# t'at $rau%&o )as &nco-"!t!nt, 'as +!ry %o) I.