CASE STUDY RESEARCH CONTENT & PRESENTERS: Characteristics & Types of Case Studies Nur Haiyu binti...
-
Upload
derrick-gilmore -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of CASE STUDY RESEARCH CONTENT & PRESENTERS: Characteristics & Types of Case Studies Nur Haiyu binti...
CASE STUDY RESEARCH
CONTENT & PRESENTERS:Characteristics & Types of Case Studies Nur Haiyu binti IshakExample of A Case Study ResearchYusrina bintiHasanStrengths and Weaknesses Nur Syazwani
WHAT IS A CASE STUDY RESEARCH METHOD?
• ‘an empirical inquiry that investigates a
contemporary phenomenon within its
reallife context; when the boundaries
between phenomenon and context are
not clearly evident; and in which multiple
sources of evidences are used’
(Yin, 1984)
WHAT IS A CASE STUDY RESEARCH METHOD?
• A method use to study individual or institution in depth and details within its own concept.
• The subject can be individual, a small group, object, an organisation or process.
WHEN TO USE CASE STUDY METHOD?
• To answer questions like ‘how’ or ‘why’
• When investigator has a little/no
possibility to control the events
• Contemporary phenomenon in a real-life
context
(Yin, 1994)
TYPES OF CASE STUDIES
• Explanatory
• Exploratory
• Descriptive
• Intrinsic
• Instrumental
• Collective
• Single-case
• Multiple-case
AN EXAMPLE OF EXPLORATORY CASE STUDY RESEARCH
a) Research Title
Language Use By Bilingual Special Educators
Of English Language Learners With Disabilities
International Journal of Special Education. (2009).
Vol. 24. No. 3; pg. 63-69.
b) Researchers Involved• Oneyda M. Paneque & Diane Rodriguez
from East Carolina University
AN EXAMPLE OF EXPLORATORY CASE STUDY RESEARCH
c) Research Objectives• To examine the language use of five bilingual
special education teachers of English Language Learners (ELLs) with disabilities.
d) Research Questions• Did the special education teachers use both
English and Spanish for instruction?• If so, how were English and Spanish used?• Were there differences in the use of English and
Spanish by the special education teachers?
AN EXAMPLE OF EXPLORATORY CASE STUDY RESEARCH
e) Methodology• Classroom observations.
- The participants were observed during five
class periods over the course of a six week
period.
- The observations were conducted by the
principal investigator (PI) of this study.
- The PI took notes during the class periods
describing the context of the classroom
learning situation.
AN EXAMPLE OF EXPLORATORY CASE STUDY RESEARCH
• Audio recordings of teacher lessons. - Each time the teacher was observed, the PI made audio recordings of the teacher lessons. - These recordings were later transcribed and
coded for frequency of language used and how the language was used.
• Teacher Interviews. - After the last classroom observation, each teacher was interviewed individually to gather additional data on their use of English and Spanish in the classroom.
AN EXAMPLE OF EXPLORATORY CASE STUDY RESEARCH
Three principles of data collection:• Use multiple sources of evidence
-Triangulation = searching converging findings from
different sources -> increases construct validity• Create a case study database
- Case study notes (clear & available for later use)
- Case study documents
- Tabular materials (collected & created)
- Narratives (initial open-ended answers to the study
questions suggested by investigators)• Maintain a chain of evidence
STRENGTHS
• Focuses on an individual or one aspect only which can allow for in depth and detail observation.
• Use various techniques of data collection including personal observation, interview and record/document related to aspects focus on in the study
• It enables the researcher to gain a holistic view of a certain phenomenon or series of events.
WEAKNESSES
• Need to collect data from a variety of sources which can be difficult to control.
• Data gathered maybe influenced by
researcher`s bias.• Although it allow indepth data gathering,
the scope is not broad.
SOURCE OF EVIDENCE STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
Documentation •stable - repeated
review
•unobtrusive - exist
prior to case study
•exact - names etc.
•broad coverage –
extended time span
•retrievability - difficult
•biased selectivity
•reporting bias –
reflects author bias
•access - may be
blocked
Archival Records •Same as above
•precise and
quantitative
•Same as above
•privacy might inhibit
access
Interviews •targeted - focuses on
case study topic
•insightful – provides
perceived causal
inferences
•bias due to poor
questions
•response bias
•incomplete recollection
•reflexivity – interviewee
expresses what
interviewer wants to hear
SOURCE OF EVIDENCE STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
Direct Observation •reality - covers events
in real time
•contextual – covers
event context
•time-consuming
•selectivity – might
miss facts
•reflexivity - observer's
presence might cause
change
•cost - observers need
time
Participant Observation •Same as above
•insightful into
interpersonal behavior
•Same as above
•bias due to investigator's
actions
Physical Artifacts •insightful into cultural
features
•insightful into technical
operations
•selectivity
•availability