CASE RESOLVING

50
CASE RESOLVING By Naiara Arriola & Irati Basoredo [email protected] [email protected] University of Deusto General Problems of Transnational Law Intensive Program September 2008

description

CASE RESOLVING. By Naiara Arriola & Irati Basoredo [email protected] [email protected] University of Deusto General Problems of Transnational Law Intensive Program September 2008. AGENDA. SKILLS INVOLVE IN THE STUDY OF LAW By Hanson, S. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of CASE RESOLVING

Page 2: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

AGENDA

SKILLS INVOLVE IN THE STUDY OF LAW

- By Hanson, S.

- Exercises, Analyse outcomes, some proposals

HOW TO MADE A WRITTEN REPORT?

- Exercises, Analyse outcomes, some proposals

ROLL PLAYING

- Moot Court

Page 3: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Skills involve in the study of law

Skills (by Hanson, S.)

1) General study skills

2) General language skills

3) Intelectual and technical skills

4) Argument construction

5) Specific substantive subjects

Page 4: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Intellectual and technichal skills

1) How to locate primary and secondary legal sources

2) How to read/ analyse the law

3) How to write

Page 5: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

1st exerciseUsing the brainstorming technique, answer the following questions

(groups of 3):

1) How would you locate legal sources?

2) Where would you find them?

3) Look for legal sources that could be applied in the case (Martinica v. Shoes Factory)

- Primary legal sources

- Secondary legal sources

Page 6: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

How to locate primary and secondary legal sources

• Primary legal sources: - Civil Law’s tradition: domestic law, international conventions, European Union Law...

- Common Law’s tradition: case law, domestic law, international conventions, European Union Law...

• Secondary legal sources: case law, Scholars’ settled view

- Civil Law’s tradition: case law, Scholarship...

- Common Law’s tradition: Scholarship...

Page 7: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

How to locate primary and secondary legal sources

• European Union:

http://europe.eu/index.en.htm

• United Nations Commision on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)

http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/index.html

• UNILEX (a database of Case Law and bibliography on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods and the UNIDROIT principles. BONELL, M.J. and VENEZIANO, A. (editors).

http://www.unilex.info/

• CISG database o f the Institute of International Commercial Law of the Pace Law School. Pace University, New York.

http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/

Page 8: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

2nd EXERCISE

Using the brainstorming technique, answer the following questions (groups of 3):

1) How would you analyse primary legal sources?

2) How would you analyse secondary legal sources?

Page 9: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

How to read/ analyse the law

-Primary legal sources:

• Understand draftting issues in primary legal sources

• Understand how primary legal sources are constructed

• Interpreting rules of primary legal sources, using second legal sources...

Page 10: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

How to read/ analyse the law

- Secondary legal sources: Case law

• Look for the hierarchy of the court

• Identify the rules applied by the court

• Identify others conflicting cases

• Identify the facts which will help you deciding whether the case is applicable

• Identify the outcome

Page 11: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

3.2) How to read/ analyse the law

- Secondary legal sources: Scholarship

• Indentify different views

• Identify and explain the arguments in different views

• Compare and evaluate the arguments

• Draw a conclusion

How to read/ analyse the law

Page 12: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

How to read/ analyse the law

- Understand the relationship between primary legal sources and secondary legal sources

• First, read and analyse the rules of primary legal sources

• Second, look for the interpretation carry out in secondary legal sources: case law and Scholarship

Page 13: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

3rd EXERCISE

Using the brainstorming technique, answer the following questions (groups of 3):

1) What is an “argument”?

2) What is a “legal argument”?

Page 14: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Argument construction

- Distinguish between the general meaning of argument and legal argument

• Argument: an statement or a fact addressed to prove an assertion/ position (Factual Basis)

• Legal Argument : a series of statements which are interpretated in accordance with law in order to prove or disprove a given position (Legal Basis)

Page 15: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Argument construction

- Differentiate and apply deductive and inductive reasoning

• Deductive = Universal Statements + Scientific Tools

• Inductive = Observe Particular Statements + Generalize

Particular Statements

Universal Statement

Page 16: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

4th EXERCISE

Using the brainstorming technique, answer the following questions (groups of 3):

1) Which is the most suitable reasoning method in order to resolve a case?

2) Deside the reasoing method that you will use to resolve the case (Martinica v. Shoes Factory)

Page 17: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

* The mayority of arguments revolving around the use of facts and legal authority to resolve legal cases are constructed by the following structure:

1st Using deductive argument construct a central deductive argument

Ex. - To steal is to act contrary to law (first deductive argument)

- Particular case: Carol has stolen

Central deductive argument: Carol has acted contrary to law

Argument construction

Page 18: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Argument construction2nd Reasoning by inductive method, construct two deductive arguments: one, affirming the central deductive argument and another, denying it.

Defense thesis: Carol has NOT stolen

Prosecution thesis: Carol has stolen

Inductive reasoning:

-She was reading

- Then she remember that she has to go to class

- She is on anti-depressant prescription

- She has not intention to take the book

Inductive reasoning:

-She was seen by a witness putting the book in her bag.

- She was stopped outside by the guard and the book was in her bag

- The computer system had not recorded a sale of that book

Page 19: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Argument construction

- Develop critical thinking = reasoning logically, ability to locate underlying assumptions, skills of analycise and argument, give creativity to the activity of thinking, the ability to compare and contrast, ability to reflect, ability to search for hidden assumptions behind the general accepted acts or thougthts...

- Understand the connection between factual analysis and legal analysis

Page 20: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Argument construction

- Understand the way in which an argument is based on: factual analysis, legal reasoning, persuasion and critical thinking

- Construct a competent argument in relation to a legal problem to be solved acording to rules of legal reasoning acceptable

Page 21: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Argument construction

Identification of nature of the

problem

Location of pottentially relevant:

-Facts

- Legal sources

Evaluation of problems and

solutions

Reflection as to conclusion

Reading, summarising

and evaluation of relevant text

Drafting of potential solutions

Page 22: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Specific substantive subjects

- Knowledge of :

• Subject matters in law

• Sustantive law: private law, trade law, civil law...

Page 23: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

How to write

- An Essay, A Summary, A Written report, A Coursework, Footnotes, bibliography references…- Skills:

• Ability to Identify the object of the study

• Knowledge of the law related to the issue

• Ability to locate primary and secondary sources that will be apply

• Ability to construct a sustained argument

• Ability to structure work effectively

• Ability to make quotations, bibliography references and footnotes

Page 24: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

How to made a written report

A) Follow an agenda in order to prepare and construct the written report

B) Structure the written report effectively

C) Make quotations, bibliography references and footnotes

Page 25: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

5th EXERCISE

Using the brainstorming technique, answer the following questions (groups of 3):

Make a decision with regard to the steps you would follow to write a legal report about the resolution of the case (Martinica v. Shoes Factory)

Page 26: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Follow an agenda in order to prepare and construct the written report

1st Read carefully the case and identify the main problem

2nd Identify the relevant facts

3rd Think on the legal sources you will apply

Page 27: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

4th Locate primary and secondary legal sources: legal rules, analogous cases, textbooks and articles

5th Read carefully, note, organise and reflect on material collected

Law cases:

•What are the facts?

•What legal rules have been applied and why?

•What aspects of this case are relevant to may report?

Follow an agenda in order to prepare and construct the written report

Page 28: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Follow an agenda in order to prepare and construct the written report

Textbooks

• What is being described?

• Does it fit with my understanding of the cases?

• What is of relevance to my report?

Articles

• What is the writer’s argument?

• Is it well supported by the evidence?

• Does the writer’s argument support or deny my argument in the report?

Page 29: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Follow an agenda in order to prepare and construct the written report

6th Try to resolve the case: begin to form possible arguments

Analysis of facts

Legal Analysis

Critical analysis: inductive and deductive modes of reasoning

Page 30: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Follow an agenda in order to prepare and construct the written report

7th Begin to write the report

Notes of primary and secondary legal sources

Notes of your arguments

Make a diagram

8th Write the first draft of the written report

9th Review the first draft and write the final version of the report

Put ideas in order

Page 31: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

6th EXERCISE

Using the brainstorming technique, answer the following questions (groups of 3):

1) How would be the general structure or form of a written report?

2) Decide the structure you will use in the case (Martinica v. Shoes Factory).

Page 32: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Structure the written report effectively

General form of a written report:

1) Purpose or object

2) De facto arguments (Factual Basis)

3) De iure arguments (Legal Basis)

4) Conclusions

Page 33: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

7th EXERCISE

Using the brainstorming technique, answer the following questions (groups of 3):

1) What is a quotation?

2) Do you know different ways of quoting?

3) What is a bibliography reference?

Page 34: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Quotations and references of primary and secondary legal sources in the written report

- Quotation = take an idea from an author using the exact same words as the original author inside the text of the report (In quotation marks “”).

- Reference = take an idea from an author without using the exact same words.

1) ARTICLES AND BOOKS, PRIMARY LEGAL SOURCES AND CASE LAW

Page 35: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Quotations and references of articles and books

- Quotations: Types

• Direct quotations = using the exact same words as the original author + taking the text from the work of the same author

• Indirect quotations = using the exact same words as the original author + taking the text through others authors

Page 36: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Quotations and references of articles and books

- Quotations: methods

• Continental method Direct quotation: indentify the author by a footnote

Indirect quotation: identify the author by a footnote

• Anglo-Saxon method Direct quotation: indentify the author writing down the year and the page of the work inside the text in brakets

Indirect quotation: identify the author by writing down the surname(s) of the author who you have taken the quotation from and the year of his work, and the surname(s) of the primary author, in brakets.

Page 37: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Quotations and references of primary legal sources

- The quotation of a INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION woud require:

• The full name of the International Convention

• The international Organisation under whose auspices this regulation was introduced

• Place and date it was signed, and the date was ratified by the State.

• The Official State Bulletin where it was published

Page 38: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Quotations and references of primary legal sources

- The quotation of a EUROPEAN COMMUNITY LEGISLATION woud require:

• Original law (Treaties) like International Conventions

Page 39: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

• Derived law = Regulations, Directives and Decisions Council Regulation (EC) No. 2201/2003, 27th November 2003, relating to jurisdiction, recognition and execution of Judicial judgments regarding marriage and parental responsability, thereby overturning Council Regulation No. 1347/2000, Official Diary of European Union, No. L 338, 23rd December 2003, p. 1.

Quotations and references of primary legal sources

Council Decision, 19th December 2002, authorising member States to sign, in the interest of the Community, the Convention of the Hague of 1996 relating to jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition, execution and cooperation on matters of parental responsability, and child protection measures, Official Diary of the European Union, No. L 48, 21st of February 2003, p. 1.

Council Directive 2002/8/EC, 27th January 2003, designed to improve access to justice for cross-border litigations by establishing minimun common rules relating to free justice for said litigations, Official Diary of the European Communities, No. L 26, 31st January 2003, p. 1.

Page 40: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Quotations and references of case law

- International case law

- European Community case law

Judgment of the International Court of Justice, the Hague 18th December 2003, No. 2003/4, resolving the Appeal against the Judgment of 11th of September 1992, in the case of the insular cross-border and maritime territorial disagreement (EL SALVADOR v. HONDURAS; NICARAGUA as intervening party). On the web of the International Court of Justice: http://www.icj-cij.org/cijwww/cdocket/cesh/ceshframe.htm (last consulted on the 19th January 2004).

Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (6th Chamber), 15th January 2004, c. C-230/01, Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce v. Enycoed Farming Partnership, Re. 2004, p. 175.

Page 41: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Bibliography

- Making a bibliography reference

- Arranging a list of bibliographycal references in order

Page 42: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

8th EXERCISE

Using the brainstorming technique, answer the following questions (groups of 3):

1) How would you make the bibliography?

2) How would you make a reference of a book, article...?

Page 43: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Bibliography

- Making a bibliography reference

• BOOKS

• CHAPTERS OF BOOKS

• ARTICLES

• REPORTS FROM ORGANISATIONS

• DOCUMENTS PUBLISHED ON THE INTERNET

Page 44: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Bibliography

• BOOKS One author

SURNAME(S), N. Title (italised). Place: publisher, year of publication.

Two or three authors

SURNAME(S), N., SURNAME(S), N. and SURNAME(S), N. Title (italised). Place: publisher, year of publication.

More than three authors

SURNAME(S), N., et al. Title (italised). Place: publisher, year of publication.

Page 45: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Bibliography

• BOOKS

Editor(s)

SURNAME(S), N. and SURNAME(S) (eds)...

Edition

SURNAME(S), N. Title. No. Edition. Place: publisher, year of publication.

Page 46: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Bibliography

• CHAPTERS OF BOOKS

A chapter written by an identified author and published in a book of several authors

SURNAME(S), N. “Title of the Chapter”. Title of the volume of work (italised). Place: publisher, year of publication.

Page 47: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Bibliography

• ARTICLES

SURNAME(S), N. “Title of the article”. Title of the publication (italised). Year of publication, vol., No., pp.

vol. = volume

No. = issue

pp. = pages

Page 48: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

• REPORTS FROM ORGANISATIONS

Bibliography

ORGANISATION. Title of the report (italised). Publishing company, year, No., pp. Series, No. in the series.

• DOCUMENTS PUBLISHED ON THE INTERNET

SURNAME(S), N. “Title of the document”. Name of the person/ organisation responsable for the web site. Published in the web page (date last consulted).

Page 49: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

Bibliography

- Arranging a list of bibliographycal references in order

• Bibliography references are to be listed in alphabetical order of authors’ surnames

• It must include only those cited in the text

• If you have quoted the same work of an author but from several years, these must be place in chronological order, beginning with the oldest edition

• If you have quoted several works of an author which are from the same year, these must be placed in alphabetical order of titles

Page 50: CASE RESOLVING

Universidad de Deusto

9th EXERCISE

Using the brainstorming technique, answer the following questions (groups of 3):

Make and list the bibliography of the written report about the case Martinica v. Shoes Factory