8/16/2019 Carr_ is There Space for Psi in Physics

1/2

5/24/2016 Carr: is there space for psi in Physics?

http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/psi/carr2003.html 1/2

Abstract of talk given at Euro-PA conference, November 2003

IS THERE SPACE FOR PSI IN MODERN PHYSICS?

Bernard Carr School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London

Although parapsychology has already acquired a degree of respectability among psychologists, it isstill not taken seriously by most physicists and I believe the subject will not gain general acceptanceso long as this situation prevails. Therefore a crucial issue is whether physics, in either its present or some future form, will ever be able to accommodate psychic phenomena. My claim is that it will butthat this will require more than merely tinkering with the current paradigm of physics (i.e. more than

just invoking electromagnetic waves, tachyons, wormholes, standard quantum theory etc.) Althoughsome phenomena currently labelled "paranormal" may turn out to be explicable within the current

paradigm, I believe most will not be.

Invoking a new paradigm is not too radical since since the prevailing model of physical reality has

regularly undergone paradigm shifts and this has always involved moving ever further from our common-sense notion of reality. The standard dichotomy between matter and mind arose at a timewhen one could adopt the simplistic view that the arena of reality is 3-dimensional space. However,since then the physicist's world-view has changed profoundly and it is clear that our physical sensorysystems reveal only a very limited aspect of reality. In particular, General Relativity explains gravity

by proposing that the world is 4-dimensional and Kaluza-Klein theory explains electromagnetism byadding a fifth dimension; this is wrapped up so small that it cannot be observed directly but itsexistence neatly explains Maxwell's equations.

Modern extensions of this idea propose that the other physical interactions can be accounted for byinvoking further wrapped-up dimensions. In "M-theory", for example, the total number of dimensionis 11, while in the "superstring" theory it is 10. One thus has an 4-dimensional "external" space and a6 or 7-dimensional "internal" space. In the most recent variant of this idea, proposed by Randall andSundrum, the extra dimensions may not even be compactified and the physical Universe is regardedas 4-dimensional "brane" in a higher dimensional "bulk". This is very far removed from the naiveview of reality adopted by the sort of reductionist materialists who reject psychic phenomena out of hand.

What sort of paradigm would be required to accommmodate psi? An essential feature is that it mustinvolve consciousness, since this underlies all psychic experiences. This already places it atloggerheads with those physicists (the majority) who claim that we are close to a "Theory Of Everything", since such theories make no reference to consciousness. Another feature of the new

paradigm is that it must involve some kind of higher dimensional reality structure. This is becausemany psychic phenomena (eg. OBEs, NDEs, apparitions) seem to involve some form of communalspace, which is not the same as physical space but subtly interacts with it. The existence of telepathyalso suggests that our minds are part of a communal space rather than being wholly private. This"Universal Structure", as I term it, can be regarded as a higher dimensional information space whichreconciles all our different experiences of the world. It necessarily incorporates physical space but italso includes non-physical realms which can only be accessed by mind.

I propose that the higher dimensional reality structure required to accommodate psychic experiences

is intimately connected with the higher dimensional space invoked by modern physics. For if our physical sensors only provide us with a 3-dimensional aspect of a Universe which in reality has manymore dimensions, and if physical objects occupy only a limited part of that higher dimensional space,what else can exist in this space? Since the only non-physical entities in the Universe of which wehave any experience are mental ones, and since the existence of paranormal phenomena suggests that

8/16/2019 Carr_ is There Space for Psi in Physics

2/2

5/24/2016 Carr: is there space for psi in Physics?

http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/psi/carr2003.html 2/2

mental entities have to exist in some sort of space, it seems natural to relate this to Kaluza-Kleinspace. More precisely, I identify the Universal Structure with the higher dimensional "bulk" of Randall-Sundrum theory. This has profound consequences for physics, psychology, parapsychologyand philosophy.