Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

21
Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009

Transcript of Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

Page 1: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm

Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm

Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009

Page 2: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

2

Council Motion – Model Update

Council Motion – Model Update

•On September 23rd, Council approved the following:

•“1. Staff be directed to run the modeling for water levels in the Carp River with data updated to reflect the storm of July 24, 2009 and the super-saturated soil conditions and assess whether this new data is consistent with expectations produced by the model under such conditions;

•2. Staff report back to Planning and Environment Committee on October 13, 2009 on the results of running the model with the updated data;”

Page 3: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

3

Model Keeper RoleModel Keeper Role• On May 27th, 2009, in conjunction with the Third

Party Review (TPR), Council approved the following recommendation:

• “Approve a budget of $75,000 to retain Greenland International as the model keeper through 2009 and waive the provisions of the Notice By-law with respect to this budget amendment;”

Page 4: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

4

Model Keeper RoleModel Keeper Role  The Model Keeper assignment is a dynamic

assignment which involves: Maintaining the models that were previously

developed for the upper Carp River and overseeing any changes to reflect new development features,

Overseeing model adjustments as additional monitored data becomes available, and

Review any changes to ensure the Third Party Review recommendations are not impacted.

Page 5: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

5

Work in Relation to Model Keeper RoleWork in Relation to Model Keeper Role In early August, Greenland was instructed to

commence an update of the models to simulate conditions present in July 2009. In keeping with the Model Keeper Role, this assignment has included:

Updating data on new/active developments not included in the model,

Updating new Storm Water Management facilities not included in the model,

Inputting rainfall records from the July 2009 storm event, and

Inputting data measured in the field (one monitor, staked high water marks, etc).

Page 6: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

6

Rainfall Analysis – July 24th/25th Event

Rainfall Analysis – July 24th/25th Event

The weather radar data collected for the July 24/25 2009 storm event indicated a series of pockets of intense rainfall that were localized.

There was considerable variation in rainfall patterns within a few kilometers.

Advances in state of art science has enabled the use of the weather radar data, which has been applied with success elsewhere in the Province.

The City provided weather data that had been calibrated with the 5 rain gauges in the watershed.

Page 7: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

7

Rainfall Analysis – July 24th/25th Event

Rainfall Analysis – July 24th/25th Event

Page 8: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

8

Rainfall Analysis – July 24th/25th Event

Rainfall Analysis – July 24th/25th Event

Nine rainfall patterns were used to represent various pockets of rain in the overall drainage area.

Most stringent pocket rainfall event: The worst rainfall was measured at grid no 11926

(near Amberwood Village). The July 24/25 event had two pulses in a 12 hr

period. From 3:10 PM to 5:15 PM - 66.72 mm (greater than

100 year 2 hour event – Provincial Std is 1:100yr). From 9 PM to 12 AM - 24.64 mm Important consideration: Thursday July 23rd there

was 16.27 mm of rain over the entire day carrying over into early July 24th.

Page 9: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

9

Rainfall Preceding EventRainfall Preceding Event

Page 10: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

10

Important NoteImportant Note The model findings are preliminary. Greenland

follows a rigorous Quality Assurance and Control process that requires an internal review of results. To respond to the Planning and Environment Council motion within the Council directed timelines, Greenland has forwarded this information prior to finalizing its full internal review process. (1-2 weeks)

Page 11: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

11

Model Run ScenariosModel Run Scenarios Adjusting soil moisture conditions from normal

to saturated to supersaturated. Varying hydraulic parameters to mimic summer

vegetation. Adjusting starting water levels in Glen Cairn

facility. Adjusting base flow conditions at the start of

event.

Page 12: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

12

July Storm – Field ObservationsJuly Storm – Field Observations Measured high water marks close to 100 year

flood levels upstream of Hwy 417. Measured water levels were 0.9m below 100 year

flood levels at the Village of Carp.

Page 13: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

13

Model FindingsModel Findings Glen Cairn facility bottom appears to be low in

original model. Overbank areas appear to be higher from topography on City emap. Adjusting facility bottom causes water levels to be closer to measured high water marks.

Slight water level changes using different hydraulic parameters for summer vegetation.

The slight difference in water levels from the hydraulic model could be adjusted bringing in the timing of the response from certain key areas with future data collected from the two additional monitors.

Page 14: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

14

Third Party Review RecommendationsThird Party Review Recommendations

The following TPR recommendations were approved by Council on May 27th, 2009:

Interim SWM facilities are to be designed for post to pre conditions up to and including the 100 year storm event.

SWM Ponds located adjacent to the Carp River flood plain are not to be used as interim sediment control facilities.

Page 15: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

15

Third Party Review RecommendationsThird Party Review Recommendations

The fringe areas proposed for filling in the vicinity of Pond 1 should not be filled until such time as the Restoration Plan has advanced to provide sufficient overall flood storage volume in the study corridor.

Without any monitored data to validate the original hydrology models, limit the interim development to 34.0% of the development area including future Fernbank Community lands. Each development should provide additional at source volume prorated on contributing area based on 100 to 120 m³/ha.

Page 16: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

16

Third Party Review RecommendationsThird Party Review Recommendations

The development can proceed to full build out with the completion of the Restoration Plan and with monitored data to validate the original model or the proposed development has incorporated the additional features to account for the 85,600 m³ identified as a supplemental volume to account for a worst case scenario defined in Phase 1 Section 5.

The Fernbank lands, in the developed condition, do not need to be incorporated in the models now because it is sufficient to require that peak flows not exceed existing conditions in the upper Carp River and that runoff volume not exceed the suggested 40,000 m³ above existing conditions for the 100 year event.

Page 17: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

17

Third Party Review RecommendationsThird Party Review Recommendations

Sediment volume can only be identified with analyses for a variety of phasing schemes for development due to the variability of material that will comprise the sediment found in the runoff.

The SWM facilities proposed will deal with water quality by treating the typical urban runoff anticipated after development. The clay and silt particles present with undeveloped conditions that normally will not settle out with standard pond designs will be less prevalent with future development once stabilized.

Page 18: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

18

Carp River Model Update – July Storm

Recommendations and Conclusions

Carp River Model Update – July Storm

Recommendations and Conclusions

The worst two hour portion of the July 2009 storm was only greater than the 100 year statistical 2 hour storm from Ottawa weather records in less than 30% of the watershed. The 100 year two hour volume is significantly greater than the two hour storm volume recorded in the remainder of the watershed. Therefore, the TPR Worst Case scenario volume of 85,600 m³ is still valid.

Since the TPR, the July 2009 storm has shown a vulnerability of municipal infrastructure in the Glen Cairn community. A range of possible solutions are being considered as part of the investigation. This review has followed a worst case scenario approach to provide for flexibility in developing an appropriate solution.

Page 19: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

19

Carp River Model Update – July Storm

Recommendations and Conclusions

Carp River Model Update – July Storm

Recommendations and Conclusions

The Hazeldean Road Widening is not impacted. Development can still proceed to the levels stated

in the City staff recommendations during the TPR.

Revised modeled water levels to be applied to set outlet conditions for interim facilities and hydraulic gradelines for new developments.

Page 20: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

20

Next StepsNext Steps Confirm Glen Cairn facility bottom model

assumptions with field survey, Coordinate efforts between Model Keeper and

Flooding Investigation, Continue data collection to build robust model, Adjust, where warranted, widening alternatives

presently being reviewed to optimize benefit through the Carp River corridor based on potential Glen Cairn solutions, and

Provide adjusted water levels to active applications (Trinity, Hazeldean Rd Widening).

Page 21: Carp River Model Update July 2009 Storm Planning and Environment Committee October 13, 2009.

21

Questions?Questions?