Carn Paper On Participatory action research

23

description

This presentation reports on findings of a multi year project using participatory action research to improve education for homeless students

Transcript of Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Page 1: Carn Paper On Participatory action research
Page 2: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

A mixed methodological study of whether and in what ways PAR is efficacious for educators developing new practices for homeless or transient students in the United States

E. Alana James, Ed.D.

Jones International University

Centre for Research Strategies

Page 3: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of PAR methodology:

1. As a tool to engage both administrators and teachers

2. As a process of professional development through which to address issues of educational disadvantage

The discussion will conclude by asking whether and to what extent educators in the study improved their educational practice for homeless and highly mobile students in the United States?

Page 4: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Context and Background1. Homeless (H) children may periodically live out of

their parent’s car or sleep on a friend’s couch (sofa) – there are approximately 1.5 million homeless children in the United States. A recent study of homeless street youth showed that some had attended as many as 19 schools .

2. Highly mobile (HM) or transient children attend two or more schools each school year and have been shown to be at high risk for dropping out (leaving early). There is no way to measure the size of this population.

Page 5: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

All students are affected

1. Because schools in the US are not on the same curricular schedule, moving from school to school is like surfing waves of educational strategy – these students frequently end up years behind their peers in literacy and comprehension (Rumberger 2003).

2. Studies have shown that in urban areas any given cohort of students may change more than 50 % of their population every five years (Kerbow, 2003).

Page 6: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

50% of the US has moved in the last five years

Yet educational practice has not changed to meet this challenge and pre-service preparation continues to prepare teachers as though they will be able to practise their classroom management strategies in a stable school environment.

Page 7: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Would the PAR process work?

Page 8: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

The Participatory Group

Page 9: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

• Seventeen educators – 9 administrators

Representing:

• 1 homeless shelter,

• 1 charter high school (ages 14-18)

• 2 middle schools (ages 11-13),

• 1 multi level school (grades 4 - 19)

• 4 elementary schools (ages 4- 10)

Participants:

Page 10: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Their context:

Schools that were in: rural (1) , small towns (3), suburban areas (3), urban (3)– Rural = 120 students in 13 grades - population less

than 1,000– Small town = 75,000 people or less– Urban population = 1.5 - 3 million– Suburban = industrial or residential community

clustered next to urban population

Page 11: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Measurement:Implemented a primarily qualitative mixed methods

designUsed variables derived from the research:• Greenwood and Levin (AR as a method to

engage with social issues), • Zuber Skerritt (AR as professional

development), • Paolo Friere (qualitites of participatory and

emancipatory groups)Open and selectively coded data • Verified outcomes through triangulation with final

administrator and teacher focus groups

Page 12: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Data rich environment

– Reflective memos collected monthly

– Survey on engagement

– In depth interviews – pre and post

– Their final reports

– Email correspondence

* Focus groups, administrators and teachers

Page 13: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Results: PAR and Engagement

Started the process overwhelmed, frequently admitting that if not for the stipend “they would not have finished”

After six months• 82% had demonstrated engagement

through action. – 70.6% engaged in issues pertaining to welcoming

school culture– 70.6% also engaged in developing flexible

instructional strategies but with fewer examples – 52.9% with increasing access to educational

services

Page 14: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Results: Professional development1. Framework for research and action that

enhanced participant’s capacity to address the issues they studied.

2. Process of reviewing data and theory with other educators to plan action = a feeling of their own expertise.

3. Difficult challenges in personal research = pride in their results.

4. Healthy dissatisfaction with the issue = The greatest increase in capacity

Page 15: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

What practical changes resulted?

1. Educators increased the access H&HM students had to services (8)

2. They worked at making their school cultures more welcoming and inclusive (9)

3. They increased the flexibility of their educational practice (2)

Page 16: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Access to Services – their research• What services were H&HM involved in?

• Had services been offered?

• What prevented attendance?

• What could increase H&HM attendance/participation in school?

• Were appropriate services offered soon enough?

• What was the impact of those services?

Page 17: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Welcoming school culture• Opened a parent welcoming centre (1)• Developed a “lunch bunch” group so highly

mobile or transient students could make friends and discuss their experience in school (2)

• Researched how students were greeted and the ways in which they learned about the school (2)

• Interviewed parents enrolling students mid year (3)

• Transmitted more information to teachers (5)

Page 18: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Flexible Instructional StrategiesFlexible instructional strategies are something

that everybody strives for all kids, you have to differentiate, it is not an easy thing to do.

• Teacher changed poetry in her reading curriculum to include poems about homelessness. Motivation to memorize the poems soared.

• At the end of the school year her homeless students had excelled in this curricula four times the expected growth.

Page 19: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Conclusion

PAR methodology created the holding environment necessary to allow them to engage in these issues without being uncomfortable (Heifetz, 2000)

Page 20: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Did they improve educational practice?

They say their practice was much improved:– Poised to welcome new students– Understand and are able to address situations that

involve meeting a student’s primary needs such as food, clothing and supplies

– Have increased empathy to student’s challenges– Have implemented new practices

Page 21: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Lack of student level outcomes• Only one study showed student level

outcomes- that of the teacher who increased her reading scores an average of 300 lexiles for her H&HM students on a curriculum known for an average of 75 lexiles

• Recommendation to improve facilitation to focus on the attainment of student level outcomes

Page 22: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

Epilogue• During the 2005-2006 school year 46 participants

from four states (Colorado, Texas, Arkansas and Virginia) are participating in a similar study using web-based PAR methodology.

• They each are responsible for:– Completing an individual project for which they receive

a stipend of $1,000. Each participate in:• A local team of an administrator (mostly principals), a teacher

and a community member

• Two online Communities of Practice (CoPs) using web based forums of communication.

Page 23: Carn Paper On Participatory action research

More information:

1. www.crsllc.org/resources/html = the pdf for the book done by the participants in the first study

2. www.wbpd.org is the URL for the new project: Username = wbpd & Password = guest

3. [email protected]