Cardiac MR and viability

14
Case

Transcript of Cardiac MR and viability

Page 1: Cardiac MR and viability

Case

Page 2: Cardiac MR and viability

•80 yo F with PMH of HTN, HLD, DM, CVA with a history of continuous chest pain x 2 weeks. Patient was found to have a LBBB on unknown duration. Cardiac enzymes were negative. The patient was transferred to WHC for further management.

Page 3: Cardiac MR and viability
Page 4: Cardiac MR and viability
Page 5: Cardiac MR and viability
Page 6: Cardiac MR and viability
Page 7: Cardiac MR and viability
Page 8: Cardiac MR and viability
Page 9: Cardiac MR and viability

Dobutamine CMR• Contractile reserve can be assessed using low dose dobutamine

stress test

• Allows for superior endocardial border definition facilitating more accurate wall motion and wall thickening

• Dobutamine CMR vs PET

• 35 patients with mild LV dysfunction

• Sensitivity of 88% and Specificity of 87% for detecting regions of viable myocardium

• Reduced predictive ability with more severe dysfunction is present at rest with specificity in the 80% range, but sensitivity limited to 50%

• If contractile function improves with dobutamine the there is likely viability

• Lack of improvement, however, does may not rule out viability as ischemia may develop at even low levels of dobutamine administration

Mahrholdt, et al. Heart 2007

Page 10: Cardiac MR and viability

Contrast Enhancement CMR

• Regions of myocardial infarct exhibit signal intensity (contrast enhancement) on T1-weighted images after administration gadolinium

• Gadolinium passively diffuses into the intracellular space due to rupture of myocyte membranes leading to increased contrast concentration in interstitial space between collagen fibers

• Contrast images are acquired mid-diastole

• The inversion time must be manually selected to null signal from normal myocardial regions

• This varies btw patients as a function of dose and and time after administration of contrast due to varying pharmacokinetics. Mahrholdt, et al. Heart 2007

Page 11: Cardiac MR and viability

Mahrholdt, et al. Heart 2007

Page 12: Cardiac MR and viability

Use of contrast enhanced MRI to identifify reversible myocardial dysfunction

• Methods

• 50 patients prospectively enrolled

• Of these 41 patient had MRI before and after revascularization

• Inclusion criteria

• Scheduled to undergo revascularization

• Had regional wall motion abnormalities bu ventriculogram or echo

• Exclusion criteria

• Unstable angina

• NYHA Class IV heart failure

• Contraindication for MRI

• Results

• 80 percent of patient demonstrated hyperenhancement

• 50 percent with q waves on ekg showed hyperenhacement

• Before revascularization, 38 percent of pts had abnormal contractility and 33 percent had some areas of hyperenhancement

• Areas with dysfunctional, but non-hyperenhancing myocardium improved significantly after revascularization Kim et al NEJM, 2000

Page 13: Cardiac MR and viability

Viability post CABG• Methods

• 60 patients undergoing mutlivessel CABG were studies preoperatively, 6 days and 6 months post op

• Patients were also randomized to be off pump and on pump

• Exclusion: age > 75 yo, severe pre-existing LV dysfunction, CKD, typical MRI contraindications

• Results

• Preoporatively 21% of wall segments had abnormal regional function, whereas 14% showed evidence of hyperenhancement

• At 6 months, 57% of wall segments had improved contraction by at least one grade

• Strong correlation between the transmural extent of hyperenhancement and ther recovery of in regional function at 6 monthsSelvanayagam et al Circulation, 2004

Page 14: Cardiac MR and viability

Predicting Late Myocardial Recovery and Outcomes in Early hours of STEMI

• Methods

• 104 prospectively enrolled patients with successfully reperfused STEMI

• Exclusion criteria were recent MI (<6months), shock requiring IABP, respiratory failure, contraindications for MRI

• Subjects were followed prospectively at 33 months and MRI was repeated at 6 months

• Primary endpts were change in LVEF and LV dysfunction at 6 months.

• Secondary endpt was MACE

• Results

• LGE was the best predictor of late LV dysfunction

• LGE > 23% of volume accurately predicted late dysfunction (sensitivity 89%, specificity 74%)

• LGE > 23 % carried a hazard ration of 6.1 percent for adverse events (p<0.0001)

Larose et al JACC, 2010