Carbon Enhanced MBRs

download Carbon Enhanced MBRs

of 20

Transcript of Carbon Enhanced MBRs

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    1/20

    CARBON ENHANCED MBRs

    William Conner P.E., DEE

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    2/20

    Outline

    Oily WW Treatment Challenges

    Treatment OptionsBiological IWWTP & GAC Columns

    PACT WWTP

    MBR & GAC Columns

    PAC MBR (Carbon Enhanced MBR)

    Conclusion / Summary

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    3/20

    Problem

    Refinery / Oil Processing Wastewater

    High Temp (> 50 C)Bio Difficult

    High Chlorides (->1,000 mg/L )

    V. High TDS Variability

    High Ammonia/Phenol ConcentrationsFrequent Flow interruptions

    Refractory Organics

    High Maintenance Sensitivity Water Conservation Important

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    4/20

    Main Concern

    - Refractory Organics -

    Conventional WWTPNot FeasibleCarbon Adsorption Required

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    5/20

    Treatment Options

    Oil/Water Sep. & Conventional IWWTP

    Conventional IWWTP & GAC Columns

    PACT IWWTP

    Oil/Water Separation & MBR

    MBR & GAC Columns

    PAC MBR (Carbon Enhanced)

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    6/20

    Conventional Biological Treatment& GAC Columns

    To Effluent

    Lagoons

    StormWater

    Basin

    WalnutShell

    FiltersActivated

    Sludge with

    DAF???

    Refinery Stormwater,

    Process Wastewater,

    Oil to Slop

    Oil System

    ChillerPolymer

    Methanol &

    pH Control

    Biosludge

    ThickeningDewatered Biosludge

    to Disposal

    SanitaryWastewater

    API

    Separators

    EQ

    Tanks

    GACM

    Phosphate

    Chlorination

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    7/20

    PACT Biological Treatment

    WalnutShell

    FiltersPACT

    Activated

    Sludge withDAF???

    Refinery Stormwater,

    Process Wastewater,

    To Effluent

    Lagoons

    Oil to Slop

    Oil System

    ChillerPolymer

    Methanol &

    pH Control

    Biosludge

    ThickeningDewatered Biosludge

    to Disposal

    SanitaryWastewater

    API

    Separators

    EQ

    Tanks

    M

    Phosphate

    Chlorination

    StormWater

    Basin

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    8/20

    Conventional Biological TreatmentAdvantages / Disadvantages

    Advantages Most common system

    Disadvantages Biomass unstablefeed fluctuations = upsets

    Solids wont settle in Clarifier Cant meet effluent requirements w/o GAC Ammonia may be toxic Extensive plot area required to accommodate

    equipmentSpace Limitations

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    9/20

    MBR & GAC Process Design

    WW fromPrimary

    Treatment

    MBR

    Marine Discharge

    GAC

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    10/20

    MBR & GACAdvantages / Disadvantages

    Advantages No Clarifier = No Settling Problems Smaller Footprint More Stable Biomass

    Disadvantages Membrane Fouling High Cost for GAC

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    11/20

    PAC MBR Process Design

    PAC MBR

    Marine DischargeMarine Discharge

    WW fromPrimary

    Treatment

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    12/20

    PAC MBR (Carbon Enhanced)Advantages / Disadvantages

    Advantages No Clarifier = No Settling Problems Smaller Footprint More Stable Biomass Lower Cost for Carbon No Fouling Reuse Possible

    Disadvantages Membrane Abrasion

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    13/20

    PAC MBR COD Removal

    Refinery WW - COD Removal

    PAC PetroMBR

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    11/19/2006 12/9/2006 12/29/2006 1/18/2007 2/7/2007 2/27/2007 3/19/2007

    Date

    COD,mg/L

    Feed COD Effluent COD

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    14/20

    MBR & PAC MBR Comparison

    Feed MBR

    Removal %

    PAC MBR

    Removal %

    BOD ~400 mg/L (~4 mg/L)

    99%

    (~5 mg/L)

    99%

    COD ~750 mg/L (151 mg/L)81%

    (46 mg/l)92%

    TOC ~200 mg/L (27 mg/L)86%

    (11 mg/L)94%

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    15/20

    Effluent Comparison

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    16/20

    Membrane Comparison

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    17/20

    MBRPAC MBR RO Comparison

    MBR PAC MBR

    Silica - Total 1.1 mg/L

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    18/20

    MBR & GAC vs. PAC MBR

    MBR & GAC PAC MBR

    High Op. Cost for GAC Lower Op. Cost

    Higher Capital Cost Lower Capital Cost

    Slow Acclimation Immediate Acclimation

    Susceptible to Upsets Tolerant to Upsets

    Frequent Cleaning Less Frequent Cleaning

    Poor Refractory Removal Ex. Refractory Removal

    Slow Drying Sludge Better Dewatering Sludge

    Effluent Fouled RO RO Acceptable Effluent

    Long Term Fouling?? Long Term Abrasion??

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    19/20

    Summary

    Conventional IWWP

    Not Stable MBR & GAC Columns

    Stable Operation

    Fouling Problems PAC MBR

    Stable Operation

    No Fouling ProblemsEconomicalLower Cap & Op. Expenses

    Abrasion

  • 7/31/2019 Carbon Enhanced MBRs

    20/20

    Thank You