Carbon Emissions: Past, Present, & Future
Transcript of Carbon Emissions: Past, Present, & Future
Carbon Emissions:
Past, Present, & Future
Chris Field
Carnegie Institution: Department of Global Ecology
[email protected], www.global-ecology.org
Role of the IPCC• Comprehensive assessment• Multiple layers of monitored review• Consensus approval by governments
More than 30% increase in atmospheric CO2 since thebeginning of the industrial revolution
Recently---
• 2006 CO2 – 381 ppm• Fossil emissions in 2006 = 8.4 Pg C
– 35% above 1990– Rate of increase 2000-2006 = 3.3%– Rate of increase 1990-1999 = 1.3%
• Atm growth rate 2000-2006 = 1.93 ppm/yr– 30% above 1990-2000
Field et al. 2007 SOCCR
IPCC 2007
IPCC 2007
Raupach et al 2007, PNAS
Raupach et al 2007, PNAS
Raupach et al 2007, PNAS
EIA
Carb
on e
mis
sion
s (m
illio
ns o
f to
ns/y
r)
Raupach et al. 2007 PNAS
IPCC 2007
Finding the mechanism
Carbon
inten
sity
Of eco
nomic
activ
ityPer
capit
a GDP
Popula
tion s
ize
Raupach et al 2007, PNAS
0.50.60.70.80.9
1
1.1
1.21.31.41.5
19800.50.60.70.80.9
1
1.1
1.21.31.41.5
1980
World
0.5
0.6
0.70.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.21.3
1.4
1.5
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
F (emissions)P (population)g = G/Ph = F/G
Facto
r (re
lative
to 19
90)
EmissionsPopulationWealth = per capita GDPCarbon intensity of GDP
Anthropogenic C Emissions: Carbon Intensity of GDP
Emissions increasing everywhere
Emissions
Population
Wealth
Carbonintensity
Dramatic contrast – history versus future
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%C
O2
emis
sion
sDeveloping
IndiaChina
Former SovietOther developed
Japan
Europe
USA
CumulativeRaupach et al. 2007 PNAS
Cumul Flux0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%C
O2
emis
sion
sDeveloping
India
China
Former SovietOther developed
Japan
Europe
USA
Cumul Flux Growth0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%C
O2
emis
sion
sDeveloping
India
China
Former SovietOther developed
JapanEurope
USA
Cumul Flux Growth Pop0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%C
O2
emis
sion
sLeast Developed
Developing
India
ChinaFormer Soviet
Other developedJapanEurope
USA
FAO-Global Resources Assessment 2005; Canadell et al. 2007, PNAS
Tropical Americas 0.6 Pg C y-1
Tropical Asia 0.6 Pg C y-1
Tropical Africa 0.3 Pg C y-1
2000-2005
Tropical deforestation13 Million hectares each year
Anthropogenic C Emissions: Land Use Change
1.5 Pg C y-1
Born
eo, C
ourte
sy: V
iktor
Boe
hm
deforestationtropics
extra-tropics 1.5
2000-2006
Le Quéré, unpublished; Canadell et al. 2007, PNAS
CO2
flux (
Pg C
y-1)
Sink
Sour
ce
Time (y)
Perturbation of Global Carbon Budget (1850-2006)
deforestation
fossil fuel emissions
7.6
1.5
2000-2006
CO2
flux (
Pg C
y-1)
Sink
Sour
ce
Time (y)
Perturbation of Global Carbon Budget (1850-2006)
Le Quéré, unpublished; Canadell et al. 2007, PNAS
fossil fuel emissions
deforestation
7.6
1.5
2000-2006
CO2
flux (
Pg C
y-1)
Sink
Sour
ce
Time (y)
Perturbation of Global Carbon Budget (1850-2006)
Canadell et al. 2007, PNAS
fossil fuel emissions
deforestation
7.6
1.5
4.1
2000-2006
CO2
flux (
Pg C
y-1)
Sink
Sour
ce
Time (y)
atmospheric CO2
Perturbation of Global Carbon Budget (1850-2006)
Canadell et al. 2007, PNAS
atmospheric CO2
ocean
land
fossil fuel emissions
deforestation
7.6
1.5
4.1
2.22.8
2000-2006
CO2
flux (
Pg C
y-1)
Sink
Sour
ce
Time (y)
Perturbation of Global Carbon Budget (1850-2006)
Canadell et al. 2007, PNAS
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
time
Dis
tribu
tion
(frac
tion)
Canadell et al. 2007, PNAS
An increasing airborne fraction
• Airborne Fraction– 10% Increase (p = 0.11)– 0.25% y-1
And a decreasing ocean fraction
• Land fraction– 0.6% y-1
• Ocean fraction– -0.42% y-1
Dis
tribu
tion
(frac
tion)
• up to 30% decrease in the efficiency of the Southern Ocean sink over the last 20 years
• strengthening of the winds around Antarctica increases exposure of carbon-rich deep waters
• strengthening of the winds from global warming and the ozone hole
Declining efficiency of the ocean sink
Le Quéré et al. 2007, Science
Canadell et al 2007, PNAS
0.50.60.70.80.9
1
1.1
1.21.31.41.5
19800.50.60.70.80.9
1
1.1
1.21.31.41.5
1980
World
0.5
0.6
0.70.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.21.3
1.4
1.5
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
F (emissions)P (population)g = G/Ph = F/G
Facto
r (re
lative
to 19
90)
Emissions
Attributing the change in the atmospheric growth rate
Attributing the change in the atmospheric growth rate
• The eroding trend in C intensity
• The increasing airborne fraction
• Increased economic activity
Canadell et al 2007, PNAS
0.50.60.70.80.9
1
1.1
1.21.31.41.5
19800.50.60.70.80.9
1
1.1
1.21.31.41.5
1980
World
0.5
0.6
0.70.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.21.3
1.4
1.5
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
F (emissions)P (population)g = G/Ph = F/G
Facto
r (re
lative
to 19
90)
Emissions
Carbon intensity of GDP
C intensity
= 17±6%
Airborne fraction
• ∆ = trend * time interval * emissions• = 18±15%
Dis
tribu
tion
(frac
tion)
Canadell et al 2007, PNAS
Attributing the change in the atmospheric growth rate
• The eroding trend in C intensity = 17±6%
• The increasing airborne fraction = 18±15%
• Increased economic activity = 65±16%
Size of the challenge
• World economy in 2050 ~4x current• C emissions in 2050 no more than current• 4-fold improvement in C intensity
• World economy in 2100 ~10-20x current• C emissions in 2100 ~0.5x current• 20- 40-fold improvement in C intensity
Size of the challenge (2)
• Global energy use ~ 15 TW (15 x 1018 W)• Global economic growth ~3% yr-1
• 3% of 15 TW = 450 GW– 450 new big powerplants
• Past intensity improvements ~1.5% yr-1
– 225 new big powerplants
The fate of future emissions• CO2 has a long atmospheric lifetime
– ~50% removed in a century– As much as 25% persists over 5000 years
100 200 300 400 500Model year
ppm
CO
2
Matthews & Caldeira GRL 2008
But ocean heat uptake falls in parallel with atmospheric CO2
100 200 300 400 500Model year
ppm
CO
2S
urfa
ce Δ
T (º
C)
Matthews & Caldeira GRL 2008
Stabilizing climate = 0 emissions
2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500Model year
Sur
face
ΔT
(ºC
)
Matthews & Caldeira GRL 2008
Stabilizing climate = 0 emissions
2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500Model year
Sur
face
ΔT
(ºC
)
Cum
ulat
ive
emis
sion
s (P
g C
)
Matthews & Caldeira GRL 2008
• Fossil emissions growing rapidly
• Carbon intensity stalled or degrading
• Ocean sink weakening
• Growth rate of atmospheric CO2increasing
• Stabilizing climate requires reducing CO2 emissions to zero