Carbon Assimilation

download Carbon Assimilation

of 34

Transcript of Carbon Assimilation

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    1/34

    CARBON ASSIMILATION

    AND

    PRODUCTIVITY

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    2/34

    Carbon assimilation creates plant biomass, or

    dry matter, which in turn supports humans andvirtually all other heterotrophic organisms in

    the biosphere.

    The physiology of photosynthesis light capture,energy conversion, and carbon assimilation

    are at the root of productivity.

    PRODUCTIVITY REFERS TO AN INCREASE IN BIOMASS

    Although inorganic nutrients are a part of this dry

    matter, by far the bulk of dry matter for any

    organism consists of carbon.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    3/34

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    4/34

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    5/34

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    6/34

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    7/34

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    8/34

    PHOTOSYNTHETIC CARBON REDUCTION CYCLE

    (PCR)

    The pathway by which all photosynthetic eukaryotic organisms

    ultimately incorporate CO2 into carbohydrate is known as carbon

    fixation or the photosynthetic carbon reduction (PCR) cycle. It is

    also referred to as the Calvin cycle.

    The PCR cycle can be divided into

    three primary stages :

    1. Carboxylation

    2. Reduction

    3. Regeneration

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    9/34

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    10/34

    THE CARBOXYLATION REACTION: How Calvin unraveled the path

    of carbon in photosynthesis?

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    11/34

    The basic input into the biosphere is the conversion of solar

    energy into organic matter by photosynthetic plants and

    microorganisms, known as primary productivity (PP).

    Total carbon assimilation is known as gross primary productivity (GPP).

    Not all of the GPP is available for increased biomass - there

    Is a respiratory cost that must be taken into account.

    The principal focus of most productivity

    studies is therefore net primary productivity (NPP).

    NPP is determined by correcting GPP for energy and

    carbon loss due to respiration.

    NPP is a measure of the net increase in carbon, or carbon gain, and

    reflects the additional biomass that is available for harvest by animals.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    12/34

    CHLOROPLASTS OF C3 PLANTS ALSO EXHIBIT COMPETING

    CARBON OXIDATION PROCESS

    1. The rate of photosynthesis is to measure gas exchange-either CO2

    uptake or O2 evolution.

    2. Cellular (or mitochondrial) respiration (R) is an opposite gas

    exchange,

    since it results in an evolution of CO2 and uptake of O2.

    3. Evolution of CO2 associated with photosynthetic metabolismcalled photorespiration (PR)

    4. PR involves the reoxidation of products assimilated in

    photosynthesis.

    5. The photorespiratory pathway involves the activities of at least

    three different cellular organelles (the chloroplast, the

    peroxisome, and the mitochondrion)

    6. CO2 evolved in PR results in a net loss of carbon from the cell.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    13/34

    The measured CO2 uptake in the light is

    termed apparent or net

    photosynthesis (AP)

    AP = GP - (R + PR)

    True or gross photosynthesis (GP) is thus

    calculated by adding amount of

    mitochondrial = (respired CO2 +

    photorespired CO2)

    GP = AP + R + PR

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    14/34

    CARBON ECONOMY

    Carbon economy is the term used to describe the balance

    between carbon acquisition and its utilization.

    Respiration is the principal counterbalance to photosynthesis.

    Respiration consumes assimilated carbon in order to obtainthe energy required to increase and maintain biomass.

    Respiratory loss of carbon constitutes one of the most

    significant intrinsic limitations on plant productivity.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    15/34

    PRODUCTIVITY IS INFLUENCED BY A VARIETY

    OF GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS.

    Environmental factors

    1. light 5. Nutrient supply

    2. CO2 6. Pathological conditions

    3. Temperature 7. Pollutants

    4. Soil water

    Genetic factors

    1. Carbon assimilation

    pathway (C3,C4,CAM)

    2. Leaf age3. Morphology

    4. Leaf area index

    5. Leaf angle

    6. Leaf orientation

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    16/34

    PHOTON FLUENCE RATETotal number of photons (Np) incident

    from all directions on a small sphere

    divided by the cross-sectional area ofthe sphere and per time interval (m-2 s-1).

    At very low fluence rates the rate of

    CO2 evolution due to dark respiration

    exceeds the rate of photosynthetic

    CO2 uptake = negative CO2 uptake.

    As fluence rate increases,photosynthesis also increases and

    so does CO2 uptake until the rate of

    CO2 exchange equals zero = the light

    compensation point

    At the light compensation point the photosynthesis and the respiration

    are balanced. The light compensation point for most plants falls

    somewhere in the range of 10 to 40 Qmol m2 s1.

    At fluence rates above the compensation point, the rate of photo-

    synthesis continues to increase until it reaches light saturation (LS).

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    17/34

    In most C3 plants at normal

    atmospheric CO2 levels,

    photosynthesis saturates

    with light levels of about 500 to 1000

    Qmol photons m2 s1, that is, about

    one-quarter to one-half of full sunlight.

    C4 plants never really achieve LS.

    There are also a small number of C3plants, such as peanut (Arachis

    hypogea), which do not light saturate.

    The light saturated rate of photosynthesis, for example, is lower in leaves

    that have acclimated to growth at low irradiance (shade leaves) than in

    those that have acclimated to higher irradiance (sun leaves).

    Between dawn and dusk, the rate of photosynthesis gradually increases,

    reaching a maximum near midday, and then declines.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    18/34

    The CO2 concentration of the

    atmosphere is relatively low and

    reasonably stable at about 0.035

    percent by volume or 350 Ql/l.350 Ql/l is well below the CO2

    saturation level for most C3 plants

    at normal fluence rates, which

    means that availability of CO2 is

    often a limiting factor inphotosynthesis.

    In C3 plants, increased photosynthetic rates with higher CO2 levels

    results from two factors:

    1. Increased substrate for the carboxylation reaction2. Competition with oxygen, reduced photorespiration

    At higher fluence rates, both the maximum rate of photosynthesis and

    the CO2 saturation level increase. Interestingly, most C4 plants appear

    to saturate at CO2 levels at or just above normal atmosphericconcentrations, regardless of fluence rate.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    19/34

    The rate of photosynthesis is

    actually determined not by the

    ambient CO2 concentration, as

    much as by the intracellular CO2concentration, that is, the supply

    of CO2 at the carboxylation site

    in the chloroplast.

    It assumed that the intracellular

    CO2 concentration is inequilibrium with the intercellular

    spaces.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    20/34

    Since CO2 diffusion rates depend

    in part on concentration

    gradients, the primary effect of

    increasing ambient CO2 levelswould be to increase the

    intercellular CO2 concentration

    by increasing the rate of diffusion

    into the leaf. Here it is assumed

    the water supply is adequate and,

    consequently, stomatal CO2

    conductance is not limiting.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    21/34

    Photosynthetic capacity is

    determined by the balance

    between carboxylation capacity

    and electron transport capacity

    At low CO2 concentrations, the

    rate of photosynthesis is

    limited and, hence, the

    carboxylation capacity of the

    system, but is saturated with

    respect to availability of the

    acceptor molecule RuBP

    However, any excessgeneration of RuBP, which is in

    turn dependent on the electron

    transport reactions, over that

    required to support

    carboxylation would represent

    an inefficient use of resources.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    22/34

    TEMPERATURE

    Photosynthesis, like most other

    biological processes, is sensitive

    to temperature.The temperature response curve

    can be characterized by three

    cardinal points: the minimum and

    maximum temperatures (Tmin and

    Tmax, respectively) at which thereaction can proceed and the

    optimum temperature (Topt)

    The temperature response of chemical and biological reactions can generally be

    characterized by comparing the rate of the reaction at two temperatures 10oC

    apart, a value known as the Q10: Q10 = RT +10

    RT

    The value of Q10 for enzyme-catalyzed reactions is about 2, meaning that the

    rate of the reaction will approximately double for each 10oC rise in temperature.

    This value for Q10 applies primarily to stimulation of the reaction by

    temperatures between Tmin and Topt. Once the optimum is reached, the reaction

    rate may decline sharply due to enzyme inactivation

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    23/34

    The temperature characteristics of

    C3 and C4 photosynthesis seem

    to be dominated by the

    temperature response curves for

    Rubisco and PEPcarboxylase,respectively.

    The low temperature sensitivity of

    C4 photosynthesis probably

    reflects, in part, the low

    temperature inactivation of theenzyme pyruvate, phosphate di-

    kinase.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    24/34

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    25/34

    SOIL WATER POTENTIAL

    The rate of photosynthesis declines under conditions of water stress,

    and in cases of severe water stress may cease completely.

    Stomatal closure and the resultant decrease in CO2 supply due to water

    stress imposes a major limitation on photosynthesis. When this occurs

    in the presence of light for prolonged periods of time, this lack of CO2

    supply may lead to photoinhibition of photosynthesis.

    Photorespiration may protect the photosynthetic apparatus from

    excess light under such conditions because the energy absorbed can

    be used to fix O2 when the CO2 supply is limiting due to stomatal

    closure.

    C4 plants enjoy some advantage over C3 plants with respect to

    photosynthesis and water stress because of their higher water use

    efficiency.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    26/34

    NUTRIENT SUPPLY, PATHOLOGY, AND POLLUTANTS

    Photosynthetic capacity is particularly sensitive to nitrogen supply. As a basic

    constituent of chlorophyll, redox carriers in the photosynthetic electrontransport chain, and all of the enzymes involved in carbon metabolism,

    nitrogen plays a critical role in primary productivity. In a C3 species, Rubisco

    alone will account for more than half of the total leaf nitrogen. In one

    study of C3 and C4 grasses, net photosynthesis increased linearly with

    nitrogen content. In barley seedlings, a 5-fold increase in nitrate supply

    stimulated a 25-fold increase in net photosynthesis.

    Photosynthesis energy is used

    directly in nitrate reduction andnitrogen assimilation provides

    amino acids for the synthesis of

    enzymes and proteins involved in

    both photosynthesis and

    respiration.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    27/34

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    28/34

    LEAF FACTORS

    During initial development and the

    rapid growth phase, the

    photosynthetic capacity of leaf alsoincreases. Leaf photosynthetic

    capacity then declines as the aging

    leaf undergoes senescence, a

    progressive deterioration of the leaf

    characterized in part by the loss ofchlorophyll and photosynthetic

    enzymes.

    Different types of leaves may also have different photosynthetic

    capacities. Evergreen leaves, for example, have a lower photosynthetic

    capacity than deciduous leaves.

    The young, growing leaves at the top are exposed to full sunlight while

    older leaves further down may be heavily shaded. Very often the fluence

    rate reaching leaves lowermost in a canopy may fall below the light

    compensation point for a large part of the day.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    29/34

    The ratio of photosynthetic leaf area to

    covered ground area is known as the leaf

    area index (LAI).

    Because both leaf surface and the coveredground are measured as areas (m2), LAI is

    dimensionless. Values of LAI in

    productive agricultural ecosystems

    typically fall in the range of 3 to 5.

    The optimum LAI for a given stand of plants depends on the anglebetween the leaf and the stem. Horizontal leaves, typical of beans

    (Phaseolus) and similar crops, are efficient light absorbers because of

    the broad surface presented to the sun, but they also more effectively

    shade leaves lower down in the canopy. Erect leaves, typical of grasses

    like wheat (Triticum) and maize (Zea mays), produce less shading but,

    because of their steeper angle, are not as efficient at intercepting light.

    Field studies have confirmed that canopies with predominantly

    horizontal leaves have LAI values of 2 or less, while vertical leaf

    canopies support LAI values of 3 to 7.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    30/34

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    31/34

    PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY ON A GLOBAL SCALE

    Total global productivity is estimated to be approximately 172 billion

    metric tons of dry organic matter per year.

    Approximately 68 percent (117.5 v 109 t yr1) of that total is accounted

    for by terrestrial ecosystems. The remaining 32 percent is accounted

    for by marine ecosystems.

    Productivity on land is more than twice that of the oceans on an area

    less than half as large. On an area basis, land-based production is

    about five times greater than the oceans. This difference is at least

    partly explained by differences in nutrient supply.

    Over the major portion of the oceans, dead organisms and sinking

    particles carry nutrients out of the lighted zone near the surface wherephotosynthesis occurs.

    Terrestrial ecosystems, on the other hand, retain a much larger

    nutrient capital in the soil and litter where they can continue to support

    growth and productivity. Agriculture accounts for only 5.3 percent of

    global productivity.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    32/34

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    33/34

    SUMMARY1. Carbon assimilation by plants creates the plant biomass that supports

    humans and virtually all other heterotrophic organisms.

    2. Overall carbon gain depends on net primary productivity-the balance

    between carbon uptake by photosynthesis and carbon loss respiration.

    3. Carbon loss to respiration, can be divided into the carbon cost of

    growth, or growth respiration, and the cost of simply maintaining

    structure and processes that do not result in a net increase in drymatter.

    4. Several studies have shown a negative correlation between respiration

    and growth rate.

    5. Productivity is also influenced by a variety of genetic and environmental

    factors that influence photosynthesis. These include light, available

    carbon dioxide, temperature, soil water, nutrients, and canopy

    structure.

  • 8/3/2019 Carbon Assimilation

    34/34

    6. Productivity is also influenced by a variety of genetic and

    environmental factors that influence photosynthesis. These include

    light, available carbon dioxide, temperature, soil water, nutrients, and

    canopy structure.

    7. Plants also require an adequate water and nitrogen supply in order to

    maximize their leaf photosynthetic capacity.

    8. Productivity depends on the pattern of leaf senescence and the

    structure of the canopy. The ideal canopy maximizes the efficiency oflight interception and carbon gain by balancing leaf area, leaf angle,

    leaf orientation, plant density, and senescence of older leaves.