Capital Structure

35
Joseph V. Rizzi Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

description

Capital Structure. Joseph V. Rizzi Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010. Minsky. Hedge Finance Speculative Finance Ponzi Finance Fantasy Finance. Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010. Approaches To Credit Analysis. Cash Flow Impacts default risk Balance Sheet - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Capital Structure

Page 1: Capital Structure

Joseph V. RizziAmsterdam Institute of FinanceJune, 2010

Page 2: Capital Structure

Hedge Finance

Speculative Finance

Ponzi Finance

Fantasy Finance

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

2

Page 3: Capital Structure

3

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 4: Capital Structure

44

• Cash Flow

Impacts default risk

• Balance Sheet

Determines Loss in Event of Default (LIED)

Liquidity

Valuation

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 5: Capital Structure

5

• Business Risk: EBITDA Volatility◦ Industry Characteristics◦ Firm Characteristics

• Financial Risk: EBITDA Relative to Debt• Structural Risk

◦ Issues Priority of claim on assets and income Control

◦ Focus Covenants, Seniority, Security

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 6: Capital Structure

6

• Quantitative◦ Capitalization

Cash Equity >25% Total Debt <6.0x Senior Debt (1) <4.5x First Lien <4.0x Second Lien <0.5x

◦ Cash Flow LTM EBITDA / PFI >2:1 7 x LTM FFOCF / TLA(2) >1:1

◦ Liquidity Cash + MS + RCA / P+I (3) > 1.5 : 1

1:- TLA usually >20% of senior debt and amortizes at least 30% by year 5

2:- FFOCF = LTM EBITDA - (WCI + CAPEX + Taxes + PF Interest)

3:- Liquidity tested day 1. MS (Marketable Securities). RCA (Revolving Credit Availability). Revolver usually set at 1 x EBITDA

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 7: Capital Structure

7

• Debt capacity is derived from firm’s assets◦ Operating Cash Flows◦ Asset Sales / Asset Quality◦ Leveragability

• Market Conditions

• Target financing structure

Credit curve shifts over

time depending on the economy

Rating

Rate

s

2H07Crisis

Overheated 1H07

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 8: Capital Structure

8

There are two different approaches to designing the capital structure:

20%

30%

50%

Cash FlowCash FlowModelModel

Balance SheetBalance SheetModelModel

Senior Debt

Sub Debt

Equity

3 - 4xEBITDA

4 - 6xEBITDA

Equity

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 9: Capital Structure

9

• Ratio Approach

• Cash Flow

• Advance Rate

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 10: Capital Structure

10

Market◦ Maximum senior debt and total debt ratios◦ Vary over cycle

Peers◦ Identify◦ Rating Classification◦ Key Ratios

Rating Agencies◦ Credit Statistics

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 11: Capital Structure

11

Peer XYZ XYZABC DEF GHI JKL MNO PQR STU Average Actual Pro-Forma

12 Months Ended 02/10/20xx 30/09/20xx 01/01/20xx 30/09/20xx 31/10/20xx 30/11/20xx 31/12/20xx 31/12/20xx 31/12/20xxSales 3073.8 8294.9 6165.2 852.4 2345.8 1682.1 2133.4 3506.8 3025.4 3205.3Gross Margin 25.6% 14.4% 16.3% 19.8% 22.0% 16.6% 17.1% 18.8% 17.8% 17.4%EBITDA 153.7 430.1 272.3 35.9 130.8 77.3 100.3 171.5 122.6 134.5 Margin 5.0% 5.2% 4.4% 4.2% 5.6% 4.6% 4.7% 4.8% 4.1% 4.2%Interest Expense 34.4 78.6 49.6 13.2 19.5 15.3 25.0 33.7 55.2 55.8Capex 32.1 40.7 37.1 9.8 25.8 11.3 27.8 26.4 10.7 10.7 % of Sales 1.0% 0.5% 0.6% 1.1% 1.1% 0.7% 1.3% 0.9% 0.4% 0.3%Total Assets 1482.0 3835.4 2790.1 360.5 1099.5 829.3 961.5 1622.6 950.5 952.3

Secured Bank Debt 455.4 0.0 0.0 117.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 211.9 83.2Unsecured Bank Debt 0.0 504.6 175.9 0.0 208.0 210.0 37.6 0.0 0.0Other Senior Debt 111.7 391.4 708.2 6.3 179.2 0.0 75.0 42.6 8.3 Total Senior Debt 567.1 896.0 884.1 124.1 387.2 210.0 112.6 254.5 91.5Subordinated Debt 0.0 197.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 143.7 289.2 289.2 Total Debt 567.1 1093.6 884.1 124.1 387.2 210.0 256.3 543.7 380.7Equity 419.9 1461.1 1293.3 150.2 473.8 414.4 262.5 (69.0) 96.4 Total Capitalization 987.0 2554.7 2177.4 274.3 861.0 624.4 518.8 474.7 477.1

Total Debt/EBITDA 3.7 2.5 3.2 3.5 3.0 2.7 2.6 3.0 4.4 2.8Senior Debt/EBITDA 3.7 2.1 3.2 3.5 3.0 2.7 1.1 2.8 2.1 0.7Total Debt/Capital 57.5% 42.8% 40.6% 45.2% 45.0% 33.6% 49.4% 44.9% 114.5% 79.8%EBITDA/Interest (incl. A/S) 4.5 5.5 5.5 2.7 6.7 5.1 4.0 4.8 2.2 2.4

Credit Ratings S&P BBB- A- A NR NR NR BB BB- Moody's NR A3 A2 NR NR NR Baa3 Ba2

Market Capitalization 468.2 1482.0 1295.8 104.4 510.9 249.2 177.9 612.6Enterprise Value 1035.3 2575.6 2179.9 228.5 898.1 459.2 434.2 1115.8Ent Value/EBITDA 6.74 5.99 8.01 6.36 6.87 5.94 4.33 6.32Ent Value/Sales 0.34 0.31 0.35 0.27 0.38 0.27 0.20 0.30Ent Value/Book Value 2.47 1.76 1.69 1.52 1.90 1.11 1.65 1.73Earnings per Share 1.78$ 1.73$ 2.83$ (0.06)$ 2.37$ 1.69$ 1.09$ 1.63$

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 12: Capital Structure

12

Important: Loan Market Evolution from a bank to an institutional market(back to a bank market?)

Impact: Majority of syndicated loans are rated

Pricing: Affected by rating

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 13: Capital Structure

Transformation: European LBO market transformed during 202-2007 from conservative cash flow based largely bank funded (OTD) originate to rated distribute market funded by non bank CLO demand.

Credit Quality: Ratings mitigration - 2002 – 75% B+/B or higher 2010 – 59% B – or lower

Amsterdam Institute of FinanceJune, 2010 13

Page 14: Capital Structure

14

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June , 2010

Page 15: Capital Structure

PPX FDX

1998 7.9 5.41999 7.23 4.72000 6.07 4.22001 5.81 4.12002 6.44 4.02003 7.0 4.62004 6.92 4.82005 8.16 5.252006 8.15 5.432007 9.51 6.232008 9.15 4.92009 7.43 4.010YTD 8.13 4.37

Amsterdam Institute of Finance

June, 2010 15

Page 16: Capital Structure

16

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June , 2010

Page 17: Capital Structure

17

Maximum debt capacity formula:-MDC = f(operations, amortization, rate, asset sales)MDC = [EBIT / (i+ 1/n)] + AS + RF

EBIT - Earnings Before Interest and Taxesi - Interest Raten - Straight line loan amortizationAS - Proceeds from Asset Sales

RF - Refinancing

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 18: Capital Structure

18

Issues◦ Adjustments (beware of solving for cash flows to justify price)◦ Normalization

Cyclicality Bad Management

Value Test◦ Projections implied price

Reverse Engineer - Management implied forecast◦ Firms◦ Peers

Tie Into◦ Compensation◦ Covenants

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 19: Capital Structure

19

Macro/Market Level◦ Determine rating target◦ Use target rating level financial characteristics

Funded Debt/EBITDA EBITDA/Interest Expense Funded Debt/Total Cap

Example:(A) Target Rating BB(B) EBITDA/Int for Target Rating c3.0x(C) Firm EBITDA $300mln(D) Interest Rate for Target Rating 10%(E) Maximum Debt Capacity = (C/B)/D

= (300/3)/10%= $1,000

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 20: Capital Structure

20

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 21: Capital Structure

21

Source S&P

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 22: Capital Structure

Tend to default at same rate as similarly rated non sponsored firms

Larger deals tend to have worse performance PE underwriting performance varies

Firm Defaulted and Distressed Deals (D&D) (%)Cerberus 4(67%)Apollo 13 (65%)TH Lee 6 (55%)Carlyle 16(52%)Bain 10(45%)Goldman 8(38%)Warburg 5(36%)Providence 4(33%)TPG 6(32%)Welsh 4(31%)JPM 2(29%)Blackstone 6(27%)Madison 3(25%0KKR 3(15%)

22Source: Moody’sAmsterdam Institute of Finance

June, 2010

Page 23: Capital Structure

23

Initiation of Bankruptcy

- Who has the right to file for bankruptcy?- What kinds of enterprises should be eligible to file for bankruptcy?- Can the decision to file be challenged?- When should inappropriate cases be terminated?

Preserving Firm Value / Minimizing Business Losses in Bankruptcy

- Should the business be reorganized or liquidated?- How should creditors be prevented from dismembering the

business?- Should the debtor be required to honor pre-bankruptcy contracts

with suppliers and lenders?- Should debtor-in possession (DIP) financing be made available?

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 24: Capital Structure

24

Corporate Governance in Bankruptcy

- Should the debtor’s decision making authority be limited?- How should debtor management be monitored?

Choosing the Plan of Reorganization

- Should the process be consensual or formulaic?- Who has the right to propose a plan?- How should the plan be voted upon?- How should dissenting claimholders be treated?- Should there be a time limit?- How should the debtor’s new capital structure be determined?

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 25: Capital Structure

25

LIABILITIES+EQUITY

LIABILITIES+EQUITY

ASSETS

ASSETS

Equilibrium

Restructure

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 26: Capital Structure

26

How Big is the pie?- Valuation of LHS

How much does each claimholder receive?- RHS waterfall analysis- Legal System

How should this consideration be paid?- Cash- Instruments

How much debt can the company support after a reorganization?- Debt capacity

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 27: Capital Structure

27

• Determining debt capacity using credit analysis

• Expanding debt capacity• What to expect when you exceed debt

capacity

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 28: Capital Structure

28

Banks Lose $3.7B in loans - $20.9BGoldman - $850

ABN Amros/RBS - £1B write-off on $3.4B claim UBS - $500Out of Season – 2H07/1H07

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 29: Capital Structure

29

Purchase Price

20% Premium to 7/16/07 closing price

Commodity

Basell/Blavatnik and Lyondell – Russian Rule

DIP – Debt converted into post petition financing

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 30: Capital Structure

30

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 31: Capital Structure

31

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 32: Capital Structure

32

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 33: Capital Structure

33

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 34: Capital Structure

34

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010

Page 35: Capital Structure

35

This information has been prepared solely for informational purposes and is not

intended to provide or should not be relied upon for accounting, legal, tax, or

investment advice. The factual statements herein have been taken from

sources believed to be reliable, but such statements are made without any

representation as to accuracy or completeness. Opinions expressed are current

opinions as of the date appearing in this material only. These materials are

subject to change, completion, or amendment from time to time without notice

and CapGen Financial is not under any obligation to keep you advise of such

changes. All views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter,

and not necessarily those of CapGen Financial.

Amsterdam Institute of Finance June, 2010