Capacity Planning
-
Upload
stephen-maldonado -
Category
Documents
-
view
32 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Capacity Planning
![Page 1: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Capacity (I): is the upper limit on the load that an operating unit can handle.
Capacity (II): the upper limit of the quantity of a product (or product group) that an operating unit can produce (= the maximum level of output)
Capacity (III): the amount of resource inputs available relative to output requirements at a particular time
![Page 3: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Type of Measures of CapacityOrganization Inputs Outputs
Manufacturer Machine hoursper shift
Number of unitsper shift
Hospital Number of beds Number ofpatients treated
Airline Number of planesor seats
Number ofseat-miles flown
Restaurant Number of seats Customers/timeRetailer Area of store Sales dollarsTheater Number of seats Customers/time
![Page 4: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Design capacity maximum output rate or service capacity an
operation, process, or facility is designed for = maximum obtainable output = best operating level
Effective capacity Design capacity minus allowances such as
personal time, maintenance, and scrap (leftover) Actual output = Capacity used
rate of output actually achieved. It cannot exceed effective capacity.
![Page 5: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Actual outputEfficiency =
Effective capacity
Actual outputUtilization =
Design capacity
![Page 6: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Facilities, layout Product and service factors Process factors Human factors Policy (shifts, overtime) Operational factors Supply chain factors External factors
![Page 7: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
level of capacity in excess of the average utilization rate or level of capacity in excess of the expected demand.
Capacity cushion = (designed capacity / capacity used) – 1
Sources of Uncertainty ManufacturingCustomer deliverySupplier performanceChanges in demand
![Page 8: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
1.Available capacity2.Expertise3.Quality considerations4.Nature of demand5.Cost6.Risk
![Page 9: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
1. Design flexibility into systems2. Take stage of life cycle into account
(complementary product)
3. Take a “big picture” approach to capacity changes
4. Prepare to deal with capacity “chunks”5. Attempt to smooth out capacity
requirements6. Identify the optimal operating level
![Page 10: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
DEMAND
PRODUCTION RATE (CAPACITY)
![Page 11: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
DEMAND
CAPACITY
Inventory accumulation
Inventory reduction
![Page 12: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
DEMAND
PRODUCTION (CAPACITY)
SUBCONTRACTING
![Page 13: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
DEMAND
PRODUCTION (CAPACITY)
DEMAND
PRODUCTION (CAPACITY)
![Page 14: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Economies of scale If the output rate is less than the optimal level, increasing
output rate results in decreasing average unit costs Diseconomies of scale
If the output rate is more than the optimal level, increasing the output rate results in increasing average unit costs
Production units have an optimal rate of output for minimal cost.
Minimum cost
Ave
rag
e co
st p
er u
nit
0 Rate of output
Minimum average cost per unit
![Page 15: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Minimum cost & optimal operating rate are functions of size of production unit.
Av
era
ge
co
st
per
un
it
0
Smallplant Medium
plant Largeplant
Output rate
![Page 16: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
CD= N ∙ sn ∙ sh ∙ mn ∙ 60 (mins / planning period)
CD= designed capacity (mins / planning period)N = number of calendar days in the planning
period (365)sn= maximum number of shifts in a day (= 3 if
dayshift + swing shift + nightshift)sh= number of hours in a shift
(in a 3 shifts system, it is 8 per shift)mn= number of homogenous machine groups
![Page 18: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
C’D= N ∙ sn ∙ sh ∙ mn ∙ 60 (mins / planning period)
C’D= designed capacity (mins / planning period)N = number of working days in the planning
period (≈ 250 wdays/yr)
sn= number of shifts in a day (= 3 if dayshift + swing shift + nightshift)
sh= number of hours in a shift (in a 3 shifts system, it is 8)
mn= number of homogenous machine groups
![Page 19: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
CE = CD - tallowances (mins / planning period)
CD= designed capacitytallowances = allowances such as personal time, maintenance, and scrap (mins / planning period)
b = ∙ CE
b = expected capacity (that we use in product mix decisions)CE = effective capacity = performance percentage
![Page 20: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
A company produces a product in 2 shifts pattern and 250 days in a given year. Two machines are available in the workstation. The maintenance needs 8 hours in a month. The performance rate in the first shift is 90%, in the second shift 80%. Each product needs 25 minutes to be finished.
a) Determine the designed capacity for one year.a) Determine the designed capacity for one year. b) Determine the effective capacity for one year.b) Determine the effective capacity for one year. c) Determine the expected capacity for one year.c) Determine the expected capacity for one year. d) Determine the number of products we can d) Determine the number of products we can
produce.produce. e) Determine the utilization and efficiency if the e) Determine the utilization and efficiency if the
actual output is 15 800 pieces.actual output is 15 800 pieces. d) Determine capacity cushion.d) Determine capacity cushion.
![Page 21: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Set up the product-resource matrix using the following data!
RP coefficients: a11: 10, a22: 20, a23: 30, a34: 10 The planning period is 4 weeks (there are no holidays in it, and no work on weekends) Work schedule:
R1 and R2: 2 shifts, each is 8 hour long R3: 3 shifts
Homogenous machines: 1 for R1 2 for R2 1 for R3
Maintenance time: only for R3: 5 hrs/weekPerformance rate:
90% for R1 and R3 80% for R2
![Page 22: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Ri = N ∙ sn ∙ sh ∙ mn ∙ 60 ∙ N=(number of weeks) ∙ (working days per week)
R1 = 4 weeks ∙ 5 working days ∙ 2 shifts ∙ 8 hours per shift ∙ 60 minutes per hour ∙ 1 homogenous machine ∙ 0,9 performance
= = 4 ∙ 5 ∙ 2 ∙ 8 ∙ 60 ∙ 1 ∙ 0,9 = 17 280 minutes per planning period
R2 = 4 ∙ 5 ∙ 2 ∙ 8 ∙ 60 ∙ 2 ∙ 0,8 = 30 720 mins
R3 = (4 ∙ 5 ∙ 3 ∙ 8 ∙ 60 ∙ 1 – 5 hrs per week ∙ 60 minutes
∙ 4 weeks) ∙ 0,9= (28 800 – 1200 ) ∙ 0,9= 24 840 mins
![Page 23: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
PP11 PP22 PP33 PP44 b (b (mins/ymins/y))
RR11 1010 17 28017 280
RR22 2020 3030 30 72030 720
RR33 1010 24 84024 840
![Page 24: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Complete the corporate system matrix with the following marketing data: There are long term contract to produce at least:
50 P1 100 P2 120 P3 50 P4
Forecasts says the upper limit of the market is: 10 000 units for P1 1 200 for P2 1 000 for P3 2 000 for P4
Unit prices: P1=100, P2=200, P3=330, P4=100 Variable costs: R1=5/min, R2=8/min, R3=11/min
![Page 25: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
PP11 PP22 PP33 PP44 b (mins/y)b (mins/y)
RR11 1010 17 28017 280
RR22 2020 3030 30 72030 720
RR33 1010 24 84024 840
MIN (MIN (pcs/ypcs/y)) 5050 100100 120120 5050
MAX (pcs/y)MAX (pcs/y)
10 10 000000 1 2001 200 1 0001 000 2 0002 000
priceprice 100100 200200 330330 100100
Contr. Marg.Contr. Marg. 5050 4040 9090 -10-10
![Page 26: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
P1= 17 280 / 10 = 1728 < 10 000
PP22: : 200/20=10200/20=10
PP33: : 330/30=11330/30=11
PP44=24 840/10=2484>2000=24 840/10=2484>2000
PP22= 100= 100 PP33= = (30 720-100∙20-)/30= (30 720-100∙20-)/30=
957<MAX957<MAX
![Page 27: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
The only difference is in P4 because of its negative contribution margin.
P4=50
![Page 28: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
PP11 PP22 PP33 PP44 PP55 PP66 b (hrs/y)b (hrs/y)
RR11 66 2 0002 000
RR22 33 22 2 0002 000
RR33 44 1 0001 000
RR44 66 33 6 0006 000
RR55 11 44 5 0005 000
MIN (pcs/y)MIN (pcs/y) 00 200200 100100 100100 400400 100100
MAX (pcs/y)MAX (pcs/y) 2000020000 500500 400400 200200 20002000 200200
p (HUF/pcs)p (HUF/pcs) 200200 100100 400400 100100 5050 100100
cm (HUF/pcs) cm (HUF/pcs) 5050 8080 4040 -30-30 2020 -10-10
![Page 29: Capacity Planning](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56813046550346895d95edc9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Revenue max. P1=333 P2=400 P3=400 P4=200 P5=1000
Contribution max.
P1=333 P2=500 P3=250 P4=100 P5=1000