Cancer-Specific Induction of Adenoviral E1A Expression by ......Cancer remains one of the top causes...
Transcript of Cancer-Specific Induction of Adenoviral E1A Expression by ......Cancer remains one of the top causes...
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2012), 22(3), 431–435http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1110.10061First published online December 17, 2011pISSN 1017-7825 eISSN 1738-8872
Cancer-Specific Induction of Adenoviral E1A Expression by Group IIntron-Based Trans-Splicing Ribozyme
Won, You-Sub and Seong-Wook Lee*
Department of Molecular Biology, Institute of Nanosensor and Biotechnology, Dankook University, Yongin 448-701, Korea
Received: October 18, 2011 / Accepted: November 16, 2011
In this study, we describe a novel approach to achieve
replicative selectivity of conditionally replicative adenovirus
that is based upon trans-splicing ribozyme-mediated
replacement of cancer-specific RNAs. We developed a
specific ribozyme that can reprogram human telomerase
reverse transcriptase (hTERT) RNA to induce adenoviral
E1A gene expression selectively in cancer cells that
express the RNA. Western blot analysis showed that the
ribozyme highly selectively triggered E1A expression in
hTERT-expressing cancer cells. RT-PCR and sequencing
analysis indicated that the ribozyme-mediated E1A
induction was caused via a high fidelity trans-splicing
reaction with the targeted residue in the hTERT-
expressing cells. Moreover, reporter activity under the
control of an E1A-dependent E3 promoter was highly
transactivated in hTERT-expressing cancer cells. Therefore,
adenovirus containing the hTERT RNA-targeting trans-
splicing ribozyme would be a promising anticancer agent
through selective replication in cancer cells and thus
specific destruction of the infected cells.
Keywords: Adenovirus, E1A, oncolytic virus, hTERT, RNA
replacement, trans-splicing ribozyme
Cancer remains one of the top causes of death in humans.
A number of strategies including surgery, radiation, and
chemotherapeutic approaches have been used for cancer
treatment; however, most of them are accompanied by
significant side effects and the lack of controlled trials [6].
Use of replicative viral reagents represents a new approach
to the neoplastic disease. Targeted tumor cell killing by the
viral agent is achieved by direct consequence of the viral
replication. Several conditionally oncolytic viruses that
selectively infect or replicate in cancer cells, but leave
normal cells, have been identified. Some are naturally
attenuated viral strains that more effectively infect or
replicate in cancer cells. Others are genetically modified to
mediate cytotoxicity from the oncolytic effects [1, 4, 10].
However, this antitumor agent is largely limited to specific
gene-deficient tumors and frequently harbors low in vivo
efficacy. Additionally, tissue-specific promoters used in
these viral vectors caused limitations in their antitumor
spectra to specific cancer types [11].
Tetrahymena group I intron could target and cleave a
substrate RNA and trans-splice an exon attached at its 3'
end onto the cleaved target RNA in mammalian cells as
well as in bacteria. The trans-splicing ribozyme has been
developed to revise mutant transcripts associated with
several human genetic and malignant diseases [13, 14, 16].
Moreover, we demonstrated that the ribozyme could
selectively induce antiviral gene activities in HCV RNA-
containing cells through the specific RNA replacement of
the HCV RNA [15]. Furthermore, we have recently shown
that the ribozymes could replace cancer-specific transcripts
such as human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT)
RNA or cytoskeleton-associated protein 2 transcript with
RNA exerting cytotoxic activity, and thus the ribozymes
could specifically regress cancer cells expressing the target
RNA [2, 7, 9, 12, 17]. This RNA replacement approach
would be a more attractive approach for cancer therapy
because it should inhibit or reduce the expression of the
target RNA and simultaneously produce therapeutic gene
activity selectively in the target RNA-associated cancer
cells.
In this study, we propose a new conditionally oncolytic
adenovirus whose selective replication in cancers can
be regulated at the post-transcriptional level. To this end,
we constructed a hTERT-targeting trans-splicing ribozyme
harboring the adenoviral E1A gene that stimulates S-phase
entry and transactivates both viral and cellular genes that
are critical for a productive viral infection [3]. We investigated
whether the specific ribozyme can induce expression of the
E1A gene, effectively and selectively, in hTERT-expressing
cancer cells through the targeted RNA replacement.
*Corresponding authorPhone: +82-31-8005-3195; Fax: +82-31-8005-4058;E-mail: [email protected]
432 Won and Lee
Moreover, we verified the selective trans-activity of E1A
protein by the ribozyme in the target RNA-expressing
cells.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Construction of Trans-Splicing Ribozyme
Expression vectors encoding for hTERT-specific trans-splicing
ribozymes under the control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter
were constructed as previously described [12]. Briefly, the Rib21AS
ribozyme targeting U21 on the hTERT RNA was generated to
harbor the extended internal guide sequence, which includes as an
extension of the P1 helix, an additional 6-nt-long P10 helix, and a
325-nt-long antisense sequence complementary to the downstream
region of the targeted hTERT RNA uridine. The cDNA as a 3' exon
encoding for the adenoviral E1A open reading frame gene (orf) or
adenoviral 5'UTR plus orf gene was inserted into the NruI/BamHI
site downstream of the modified group I intron expression construct,
and designated pCMV-Rib21AS-E1A and pCMV-Rib21AS-UTR-
E1A, respectively. The pCMV-E1A and pCMV-UTR-E1A vectors
encoding the E1A orf and 5'UTR plus E1A orf controlled by the
CMV promoter, respectively, were generated as controls.
Cell Culture
SK-OV3 (human ovarian cancer cell line), MCF7 (human breast
cancer cell line), HeLa (human cervical cancer cell line), HCT116
(human colorectal cancer cell line), Hep3B (human hepatocarcinoma
cell line), AGS (human gastric cancer cell line), HT-29 (human
colorectal cancer cell line), IMR90 (telomerase-negative normal
human lung fibroblast), SK-Lu1 (telomerase-negative human lung
adenocarcinoma), and THLE3 (SV40 large T antigen immortalized
but nontumorigenic normal liver cells) were purchased from ATCC
(Manassas, VA, USA). The SK-OV3, HeLa, HCT116, AGS, and
HT-29 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10%
heat-inactivated FBS (Jeil Biotech Services Inc., Daegu, Korea). The
Hep3B, SK-Lu1, and IMR90 cells were cultured in EMEM with
10% FBS. MCF7 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS.
The THLE3 cells were cultured in bronchial/tracheal epithelial cell
growth medium (Cambrex, East Rutherford, NJ, USA) with 10%
FBS, 6.5 ng triiodothyromine/ml, 50 µg gentamycin/ml, and 50 ng
amphotericin-B/ml. The transfection reagent for each cell was as
follows: SK-OV3, MCF7, Hep3B, AGS, HT-29, IMR90, and THLE3
cells, ExGen 500 (Fermentas, Hanover, MD, USA); HeLa, HCT116,
Lipofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA); SK-Lu1, DMRIE-
C (Invitrogen).
Western Blot Analysis
Cells were washed in PBS, scraped in 100 µl of lysis buffer (HEPES
50 mM, NaCl 150 mM, PMSF 0.1 mM, NaVanadate 1.0 mM, Triton
X-100 1.0%, glycerol 10.0%, pH 7.4) and solubilized for 60 min at
4oC and centrifuged for fractionation. Total protein was quantitated
using a Bio-Rad DC assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), resolved
by 10% SDS-PAGE, and then transferred to a polyvinylidene
difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membrane
was blocked in 5% non-fat milk in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20
for 1 h at room temperature and probed with antibodies specific to
E1A (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or actin
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Subsequently, the membrane was
incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room
temperature. Finally, the membrane was developed by the enhanced
chemiluminescence detection method (Amersham Phamacia, Cardiff,
UK).
RT-PCR Analysis
For the analysis of trans-splicing products in cells, total RNA was
isolated from ribozyme vector-transfected cells 24 h after transfection
with guanidine isothiocyanate supplemented with 20 mM EDTA.
RNA (5 µg) was reverse transcribed with an oligo(dT) primer in the
presence of 10 mM L-argininamide, and the resulting cDNA was
amplified with a 5' primer specific for the hTERT RNA (5'-GGG
GAATTCAGCGCTGCGTCCTGCT-3') and with a 3' primer specific
for the 3' exon E1A sequence (5'-CCCAAGCTTTCGTCACTGG
GTGGAAAGCC-3'). The amplified cDNA was then reamplified
with a 5' primer specific for the hTERT RNA and with a nested 3'
primer specific for the E1A sequence (5'-CCCAAGCTTCCGGTAC
AAGGTTTGGCAT-3'). The amplified cDNA was then cloned and
sequenced. For the internal control, cDNAs were amplified with
GAPDH primers (5'-TGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGA-3' and 5'-
TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3').
Luciferase Assay
The reporter gene construct encoding firefly luciferase under the
E1A-dependent E3 promoter was transiently co-transfected with
pCMV-Rib21AS-E1A or pCMV-E1A along with phRL-TK (Promega,
Madison, WI, USA), which encodes Renilla luciferase under the TK
promoter and is used for normalization of transfection efficiency.
Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were lysed and luciferase
activity was determined by chemiluminescence in a FB12 Luminometer
(Berthold Detection System, Oak Ridge, TN, USA) using the dual-
luciferase reporter assay system (Promega).
RESULTS
Design of Adenoviral E1A Gene Expressing Trans-
Splicing Ribozyme
We modified a ribozyme (designated Rib21AS), which
was directed at U21 on the hTERT RNA, to contain an
extension of the P1 helix, a 6-nt-long addition of the P10
helix, and a 325-nt-long antisense sequence that was
complementary to the downstream region of the targeted
uridine of the hTERT RNA. This modification enhanced
the specificity and efficacy of group I-based trans-splicing
ribozyme activity in cells [12]. A set of ribozymes were
constructed to harbor adenoviral E1A orf with or without
5'UTR as 3' exon (Fig. 1).
Selective Induction of E1A Gene Expression in hTERT-
Positive Cell Lines by the Specific Ribozyme
To observe whether the modified ribozymes could react
with and trans-splice the endogenous hTERT RNA and
thus induce the expression of E1A proteins selectively in
hTERT(+) cells, we transfected expression vectors encoding
the specific ribozymes into variant hTERT-positive or
-negative cells and assessed and compared the quantity of
CANCER-SPECIFIC E1A BY TRANS-SPLICING RIBOZYME 433
E1A production in the cells (Fig. 2). E1A proteins were
efficiently produced through the transfection of ribozyme
expression vector pCMV-Rib21AS-E1A or pCMV-Rib21AS-
UTR-E1A (Fig. 2A, lanes 4 or 5, respectively, and Fig. 2C)
in hTERT(+) cells. Inclusion of 5'UTR in the 3' exon of the
ribozyme improved the E1A production. Neither transfection
of the control vector nor pCMV-Rib21AS-Fluc, however,
produced any E1A proteins in the cells (Fig. 2A, lanes 2
and 3). Noticeably, little E1A proteins could be produced
with the transfection of the ribozyme expression vectors in
hTERT(-) cells (Fig. 2B, lanes 4 and 5, and Fig. 2C).
Trans-Splicing Reaction in hTERT-Positive Cancer
Cells by the Specific Ribozyme
We determined whether the ribozyme-mediated selective
E1A expression in hTERT(+) cancer cells is due to a
specific and high-fidelity trans-splicing reaction with
hTERT RNA in those cells. Ribozyme transfection generated
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the modified E1A-expressing trans-splicing ribozyme, Rib21AS-E1A. Potential base parings between the ribozyme and the hTERT RNA are depicted with vertical lines. Arrows represent the 5' and 3' splicing sites.
Fig. 2. The selective induction of adenoviral E1A gene expression by the specific ribozyme in the hTERT-expressing cells. Western blot analysis of E1A expression in the hTERT-positive (A) or -negative cells (B), which were transiently transfected with vector control (lane 2),
pCMV-Rib21AS-Fluc (lane 3), pCMV-Rib21AS-E1A (lane 4), pCMV-Rib21AS-UTR-E1A (lane 5), pCMV-E1A (lane 6), or pCMV-UTR-E1A (lane 7).
Whole cell lysates from 293 cells were loaded as control for endogenous E1A expression (lane 1). The actin level was assessed for internal control. (C) The
amount of E1A protein in each vector-transfected cell was normalized to the amount of actin protein. E1A expression in hTERT(+) or (-) cells transfected
with each vector was then quantitated as a percentage of endogenous E1A level in 293 cells. The expressed values represent the means with standard
deviation of five independent determinants.
434 Won and Lee
trans-spliced products in hTERT(+) AGS cells (Fig. 3A,
lanes 3 and 4) but not in an RNA sample isolated from
mock-transfected AGS cells mixed with ribozyme-transfected
SK-Lu 1 cells which are hTERT(-) (Fig. 3A, lanes 5 and
6). This result indicates that the amplified product
observed in the ribozyme-transfected cells was generated
through the trans-splicing reaction specifically inside the
hTERT(+) cells, but neither during RNA manipulation nor
via nonspecific reaction. Sequence analyses of the trans-
spliced products verified that the ribozyme accurately
targeted U21 of the hTERT RNA and spliced its 3' exon
into the target RNA in the cells (Fig. 3B and 3C).
Selective Induction of E3 Promoter-Controlled Reporter
Expression in hTERT-Positive Cell Lines by the
Specific Ribozyme
The E1A gene inserted into the 3' exon of the ribozyme
contains the full E1A gene sequence. Therefore, the trans-
spliced E1A protein provided by the ribozyme should be
functional selectively in hTERT(+) cells. In order to verify
the function of produced E1A in cells, we monitored the
level of firefly luciferase expression under the control of
the adenoviral E3 promoter whose activity is induced by
the adenoviral E1A protein (Fig. 4A) [8]. Transfection of
the ribozyme expression vector efficiently induced firefly
luciferase activity in all of tested hTERT(+) cancer cells,
the level of which is comparable to the level in cells
transfected with control pCMV-E1A vector (Fig. 4B). In
sharp contrast, the specific ribozyme negligibly induced
reporter gene activity in hTERT(-) cells when compared
with vector control. These results suggest that the specific
trans-splicing ribozyme selectively produced functional
E1A protein in hTERT(+) cancer cells.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we developed a hTERT-targeting trans-
splicing ribozyme, which can selectively induce adenoviral
E1A gene expression in hTERT(+) cancer cells. The E1A
expression occurred mainly through RNA replacement via
highly specific trans-splicing reaction with the targeted
hTERT RNA in the cells. Importantly, induction of the
adenoviral E1A gene by the ribozyme activated E1A-
dependent E3 promoter activity selectively in hTERT(+)
cancer cells with efficiency comparable to that associated
with the strong CMV promoter-derived E1A gene expression.
Cancer-specific expression of adenoviral E1A with
tumor- or tissue-specific promoters has been proposed as a
scheme to engineer conditionally oncolytic adenovirus
[11]. However, the above approach could be limited owing
to leaky specificity of the specific promoters when inserted
into the viral genome [18]. Recently, posttranscriptional
control of the adenoviral E1A expression by using normal
tissue-specific microRNA was proposed as an alternate
specific and safer virotherapy strategy against cancer [5].
Fig. 3. Trans-splicing reaction with hTERT RNA by the specific ribozyme in cells. (A) RT-PCR amplification of trans-spliced RNA products generated in cells. AGS cells were mock transfected or transfected with control vector orribozyme-expression vector (pCMV-Rib21AS-E1A or pCMV-Rib21AS-UTR-E1A). Mock-transfected AGS cells were mixed with SK-Lu 1 cellstransfected with pCMV-Rib21AS-E1A (Mix, lane 5) or pCMV-Rib21AS-UTR-E1A (Mix, lane 6). The amplified trans-spliced (T/S) RNA productand GAPDH RNA in each transfectant cell are presented. (B, C) A representative sequence of the trans-spliced transcripts resulting fromtransfection with pCMV-Rib21AS-E1A (B) or pCMV-Rib21AS-UTR-E1A (C) into AGS cells. The expected sequence around the splicingjunction is represented with an arrow, with the ribozyme recognition sequence in hTERT RNA boxed and the uridine at position 21 circled.
CANCER-SPECIFIC E1A BY TRANS-SPLICING RIBOZYME 435
However, we could not completely exclude the possibility
of cytotoxicity in normal cells due to sequestering of the
normal microRNA pathway. Moreover, systems using
specific promoter or microRNA control would be useful
only in specific tumor types. In contrast, regulation of E1A
expression via the trans-splicing ribozyme system will be
safer, because it occurs through exogenously introduced
catalytic activity of the ribozyme, but not inherent cellular
machinery. Additionally, the ribozyme could be a more
potent anticancer tool because of its ability of specific
induction of E1A activity combined with the capability of
target inhibition. Noticeably, telomerase activity is highly
elevated in most cancers. Therefore, the adenovirus equipped
with the hTERT-specific ribozyme developed here will be
useful as a conditionally replicative oncolytic virus with
high efficacy and safety for diverse cancer types.
REFERENCES
1. Alemany, R., C. Balague, and D. T. Curiel. 2000. Replicative
adenoviruses for cancer therapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 18: 723-727.
2. Ban, G., J. S. Jeong, A. Kim, S. J. Kim, S. Y. Han, I. H. Kim,
and S. W. Lee. 2011. Selective and efficient retardation of
cancers expressing cytoskeleton-associated protein 2 by targeted
RNA replacement. Int. J. Cancer 129: 1018-1029.
3. Berk, A. J. 2005. Recent lessons in gene expression, cell cycle
control, and cell biology from adenovirus. Oncogene 24: 7673-
7685.
4. Bischoff, J. R., D. H. Kirn, A. Williams, C. Heise, S. Horn, M.
Muna, et al. 1996. An adenovirus mutant that replicates
selectively in p53-deficient human tumor cells. Science 274:
373-376.
5. Brown, B. D. and L. Naldini. 2009. Exploiting and antagonizing
microRNA regulation for therapeutic and experimental
applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 578-585.
6. Cleator, S. J. and P. Price. 2000. Management problems in
oncology. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 465: 3-10.
7. Hong, S. H., J. S. Jeong, Y. J. Lee, H. I. Jung, K. S. Cho, C. M.
Kim, et al. 2008. In vivo reprogramming of hTERT by trans-
splicing ribozyme to target tumor cell. Mol. Ther. 16: 74-80.
8. Hurst, H. C. and N. C. Jones. 1987. Identification of factors that
interact with the E1A-inducible adenovirus E3 promoter. Genes
Dev. 1: 1132-1146.
9. Jeong, J. S., S. W. Lee, S. H. Hong, Y. J. Lee, H. I. Jung, K. S.
Cho, et al. 2008. Antitumor effects of systemically delivered
adenovirus harboring trans-splicing ribozyme in intrahepatic
colon cancer mouse model. Clin. Cancer Res. 14: 281-290.
10. Kirn, D., R. L. Martuza, and J. Zwiebel. 2001. Replication-
selective virotherapy for cancer: Biological principles, risk
management and future directions. Nat. Med. 7: 781-787.
11. Ko, D., L. Hawkins, and D. C. Yu. 2005. Development of
transcriptionally regulated oncolytic adenoviruses. Oncogene
24: 7763-7774.
12. Kwon, B. S., H. S. Jung, M. S. Song, K. S. Cho, S. C. Kim, K.
Kimm, et al. 2005. Specific regression of human cancer cells by
ribozyme-mediated targeted replacement of tumor-specific
transcript. Mol. Ther. 12: 824-834.
13. Lan, N., R. P. Howrey, S. W. Lee, C. A. Smith, and B. A.
Sullenger. 1998. Ribozyme-mediated repair of sickle β-globin
mRNAs in erythrocyte precursors. Science 280: 1593-1596.
14. Phylactou, L. A., C. Darrah, and M. A. J. Wood. 1998.
Ribozyme-mediated trans-splicing of a trinucleotide repeat. Nat.
Genet. 18: 378-381.
15. Ryu, K. J., J. H. Kim, and S. W. Lee. 2003. Ribozyme-mediated
selective induction of new gene activity in hepatitis C virus
internal ribosome entry site-expressing cells by targeted trans-
splicing. Mol. Ther. 7: 386-395.
16. Shin, K. S., B. A. Sullenger, and S. W. Lee. 2004. Ribozyme-
mediated induction of apoptosis in human cancer cells by
targeted repair of mutant p53 RNA. Mol. Ther. 10: 365-372
17. Song, M. S., J. S. Jeong, G. Ban, J. H. Lee, Y. S. Won, K. S.
Cho, et al. 2009. Validation of tissue-specific promoter-driven
tumor-targeting trans-splicing ribozyme system as a multifunctional
cancer gene therapy device in vivo. Cancer Gene Ther. 16:
113-125.
18. Wu, L., M. Johnson, and M. Sato. 2003. Transcriptionally
targeted gene therapy to detect and treat cancer. Trends Mol.
Med. 9: 421-429.
Fig. 4. Functional analysis of trans-spliced E1A protein by theribozyme in cells. (A) Schematic illustration of E1A-expressing ribozyme constructs and
E1A-inducible E3 promoter reporter system. (B) Transactivity of the E1A
protein in hTERT(+) and (-) cell lines. Cells were cotransfected with the
reporter construct along with control or E1A-expressing ribozyme
expression vector. The firefly luciferase activities were quantified and then
expressed relative to those by CMV promoter-driven E1A. Averages of
three independent determinants are shown with bars with standard deviations.