Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian …...Pre-hospital Interpretation of STEMI on ECG...
Transcript of Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian …...Pre-hospital Interpretation of STEMI on ECG...
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology
Guidelines on the Management of ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Focused Update on
Regionalization and Reperfusion
Warren J. Cantor, MD, FRCPC, FSCAISouthlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket
Professor of Medicine, Univ. of Toronto
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Committee Co-Chairs
Warren Cantor MD, FRCPC, FSCAIUniversity of Toronto
Southlake Regional Health Centre
Graham Wong MD, MPH, FRCPC, FACC, FCCS, FAHA
University of British ColumbiaVancouver General Hospital
“the greatest thingthat a Wong has ever done”
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Presented in Oct 2018Published in Feb 2019Endorsed by the CAEP
21 PICO Questions, 34 Recommendations
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
CCS-CAIC STEMI Guideline Authors
Graham C. Wong MD MPH (Co-Chair), Michelle Welsford MD, Craig
Ainsworth MD, Wael Abuzeid MD MSc, Christopher B. Fordyce MDCM MHS
MSc, Jennifer Greene BSc ACP, Thao Huynh MD MSc PhD, Laurie Lambert
PhD, Michel Le May MD, Sohrab Lutchmedial MDCM, Shamir Mehta MD
MSc, Madhu Natarajan MD MSc, Colleen Norris RN, MN, PhD, Christopher
Overgaard MD MSc, Michele Perry Arnesen MHA, BSN, RN, Ata Quraishi
MBBS, Jean François Tanguay MD, Mouheiddin Traboulsi MD, Sean van
Diepen MD MSc, Robert Welsh MD, David Wood MD, Warren J Cantor MD
(Co-Chair)
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
The primary panel consisted of cardiologists, intensivists, emergency medicine physicians, nurses, health
care researchers and emergency health services personnel
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Why do we need
Canadian STEMI Guidelines?
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
9.98 Million km2
2nd Largest Country in WorldPopulation: 35 Million25 million in large urban cities
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Only 44 PCI Centres in Canada
5 provinces with only 1-2 PCI centres1 province & 3 territories with no PCI centre
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Pre-Hospital STEMI Care Capability
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Development and organization of Regional STEMI Centres (Hub and spoke) and
regional reperfusion strategies
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
• Evidence suggests that STEMI care is best performed using an
organized STEMI network with a primary PCI centre[s] (the ‘hub[s]’)
receiving referrals from surrounding hospitals (the ‘spokes’) and a
defined catchment area from the field via emergency medical
services (EMS).
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
ELEMENTS OF A REGIONAL STEMI NETWORK
A pre-planned default initial reperfusion strategy (PPCI or fibrinolysis) for each hospital within the
network based on geographic and transport considerations.
The ability to deliver appropriate adjunctive PCI following fibrinolysis.
The capability of EMS and emergency depts to rapidly diagnose and treat STEMI.
For PPCI, the ability for EMS and emergency depts to activate the STEMI team through a ‘single call’
mechanism immediately from the point of first medical contact
A “no-refusal” policy at PCI centres for STEMI patients appropriate for PPCI.
The ability for EMS teams to bypass non-PCI centres and transport patients directly to a PCI centre.
The ability for appropriately selected patients to bypass the emergency dept of a PCI centre and proceed
directly to the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Patient identification and transportation
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Ducas CJC 2016
Pre-Hospital ECG & Mortality
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Models for Interpreting Prehospital ECG
Ting HH et al
Circulation 2008
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Pre-hospital Interpretation of STEMI on ECG
• Advanced Care Paramedic Physician transmission• Feasible
• May incur additional costs, delays, and/or technical difficulties
• May reduce the number of false activations
LeMay CJEM 2006
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Pre-hospital Interpretation of STEMI on ECG
• Advanced Care Paramedic Physician transmission• Feasible
• May incur additional costs, delays, and/or technical difficulties
• May reduce the number of false activations
LeMay CJEM 2006
“…..decisions related to how to best interpret the ECG and
who provides STEMI notification can be made at the
regional level.”
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
8.We recommend that EMS personnel acquire an ECG in the
field to identify STEMI and alert STEMI care teams of an
imminent patient arrival.
(Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence)
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Adjunctive STEMI prehospital therapiesOxygen
Opioids
P2Y12 inhibitors
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Question: Adjunctive Prehospital Therapies
• Which of the following statements is true?a) All STEMI patients should receive adjunctive oxygen
b) All STEMI patients should receive morphine
c) All STEMI patients should receive P2Y12 inhibitors in the ambulance
d) All of the above
e) None of the above
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Eur Heart J 2013; 34:1630-5
Management of the STEMI Patient in the Prehospital setting: Supplemental Oxygen Administration
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Circulation 2015; 131:2143-50
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
N Engl J Med 2017; 377:1240-9
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
11.We suggest avoiding routine prehospital administration of
supplemental oxygen to STEMI patients with oxygen saturation
≥ 90%.
(Weak Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence)
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Values and Preferences:
This recommendation is based on the concern of potential harm from
hyperoxemia. Furthermore, supplemental oxygen may cause anxiety
or impair communication and does not appear to have any benefit in
the absence of hypoxia.
Practical Tips:
If SaO2 monitoring is not available or not reliable (poor waveform),
prehospital providers may provide oxygen supplementation during
initial care to those patients exhibiting signs of respiratory distress.
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Am Heart J 2005; 149:1043-9
NSTEMI population
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Eur Heart J 2016;37:245-52
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
12.We suggest avoidance of routine intravenous opioid analgesic
(e.g., morphine or fentanyl) administration for STEMI-related
discomfort. However, selective use of opioid analgesic medications
may be considered for severe pain with the goal of relieving pain
and reducing anxiety.
(Weak Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence)
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
N Engl J Med 2014;371:1016-27
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
N Engl J Med 2014;371:1016-27
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
13.We suggest that prehospital (in-ambulance) P2Y12 receptor
antagonist medications not routinely be added to ASA in patients
with STEMI transported for PPCI. The P2Y12 receptor antagonist
should be administered in the emergency department or cardiac
catheterization laboratory as early as possible prior to coronary
angiography.
(Weak Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence)
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Values and Preferences:
Administration of any medication to a critically ill patient may add
complexity in the prehospital environment. Based on the currently
available evidence, the writing group concluded that routine
prehospital administration of a P2Y12 receptor antagonist could not
be recommended for transport times less than 60 minutes.
Practical Tip:
Prehospital administration of P2Y12 receptor antagonist medications
may be considered in systems or subsets of patients that have
prolonged transport times (those greater than 60 minutes) for PPCI.
Similarly, administration may be considered for those systems that
administer prehospital fibrinolysis.
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Choice of Reperfusion Strategy
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Relationship between PCI-related delay and in hospital mortality in STEMI
Pinto, Circulation 2011
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Mortality in patients randomized to primary PCI when compared with fibrinolysis according to PCI-related delay
• Pooled analysis of 25 RCTs
• Adjusted for patient, hospital and study-level covariates
Boersma, EHJ 2006
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
9. If primary PCI is used as a default reperfusion strategy for
suspected STEMI patients in the field, we recommend that
patients should bypass non-PCI capable centres and instead be
transported to the nearest PPCI centre with the goal of achieving
a maximum FMC-to-device time of ≤ 120 minutes (ideal FMC-to-
device time ≤ 90 minutes in urban settings). Fibrinolytic therapy
should be considered if this timeline cannot be achieved.
(Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence)
Pre-Hospital- PPCI vs. Fibrinolysis
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
FMC-to-Device Goals in STEMI Guidelines
CCS-CAIC ACC-AHA ESC
Pre-Hospital ≤ 120 minutes* ≤ 90 minutes ≤ 120 minutes*
Non-PCI Hospital ≤ 120 minutes ≤ 120 minutes ≤ 120 minutes
PCI Hospital ≤ 90 minutes ≤ 90 minutes ≤ 90 minutes
* Aim for ≤ 90 minutes but allow for ≤ 120 minutes when deciding PPCI vs. Fibrinolysis
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
METRIC GOAL (Regional goal: >75% of cases to achieve each metric)
First Medical Contact (FMC) to Diagnosis (ECG acquisition
& interpretation)<10 Minutes
Diagnosis to Catheterization Lab Activation<10 Minutes
Door-in to Door-out Time for Emergency Departments <30 Minutes
Transport Times for Inter-Hospital Transfers or STEMI
patients diagnosed in the field
<60 Minutes
Time from arrival at catheterization lab to first balloon
activation
<30 Minutes
Total time from FMC to first device activation (for primary
PCI)- for non-PCI centres or patients diagnosed in the field
<120 Minutes
Total time from FMC to first device activation (for primary
PCI) - for patients presenting to PCI centres
<90 Minutes
REPERFUSION TREATMENT GOALS
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Summary of Reperfusion Strategies
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Pharmacoinvasive PCI
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy: Definition
A reperfusion strategy utilizing adjunctive PCI following initial pharmacological reperfusion with fibrinolysis.
Consists of:
1. Routine immediate transfer to PCI centres after fibrinolysis
2. Immediate PCI for patients with failed fibrinolysis
3. Routine angiography +/- PCI within 24 hours after successful fibrinolysis
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Randomized Trials of the Pharmacoinvasive Strategy
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy versus Fibrinolysis and Standard of Care
GRACIA-1, CAPITAL-AMI,
SIAM-III, WEST,
TRANSFER-AMI, CARESS-
IN-AMI, NORDISTEMI
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy was associated with reduced
ischemic complications compared to fibrinolysis standard of care.
Reduced death/re-MI at 30 days with an HR of 0.65 (95% CI 0.50
to 0.86, p=0.0024).
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy versus Primary PCI
WEST, GRACIA-2, STREAM,
STEPP-AMI, EARLY-MYO
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy provided similar clinical outcomes to
Primary PCI.
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Routine Early PCI after LysisMeta-Analysis of Contemporary Trials
Piscione F et al, Eur Heart J 2010
OR 0.71 (95% C.I. 0.52-0.97)
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Meta-Analysis Contemporary Trials
Piscione F et al, Eur Heart J 2010
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
19.We recommend routine immediate transfer to PCI centres after
fibrinolysis, immediate PCI for patients with failed reperfusion,
and routine angiography +/- PCI within 24 hours after successful
fibrinolysis.
(Strong recommendation, Moderate Quality Evidence)
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
STREAM Trial- Primary Endpoint
TNK 12.4%
PPCI 14.3%
p=0.24
De
ath
/Sh
ock
/CH
F/R
e-M
I (%
)
The 95% CI of the observed incidence in the pharmaco-invasive arm would exclude a 9%
relative excess compared with PPCI
TNK vs PPCI
Relative Risk 0.86, 95%CI (0.68-1.09)
Armstrong PW et al, N Engl J Med 2013
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy as an Alternative to PPCI
17.We suggest that timely fibrinolysis (prehospital or in a hospital
without PCI capability) followed by a pharmacoinvasive strategy could
be considered as an alternative to primary PCI for patients who are
early presenters (symptom onset <3 hours), who are at low risk of
bleeding and who cannot undergo rapid primary PCI.
(Weak recommendation, Moderate quality evidence)
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Practical aspects of PCI
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
Practical Aspects of Primary PCI
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
CCS Guideline/Position Statement Workshop as Presented at CCC 2018
CONCLUSIONS:
• systematic appraisal of sex and gender considerations into guidelinedevelopment was feasible
• Barriers include:
• inadequate enrollment of women in randomized trials
• lack of publication of main outcomes stratified by sex
• lack of inclusion of gender as a study variable
CCS Pilot Project- Proof of Concept
Incorporating Sex and Gender into Guidelines
Norris C- JAHA 2019. In Press