Can a Variable be both a Mediator and a Moderator? Dominique Muller (University of...
-
Upload
beatriz-kitt -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
1
Transcript of Can a Variable be both a Mediator and a Moderator? Dominique Muller (University of...
Can a Variable be both a Mediator and a Moderator?
Dominique Muller(University of Grenoble/University Institute of France)
Charles M. Judd(University of Colorado)
Vincent Yzerbyt (Catholic University of Louvain)
2
Y i3 c ' X bMe e
3
Y i1 cX e
1
Me i2 aX e
2
Mediation (Baron & Kenny, 1986; Judd & Kenny, 1981)
X is a treatment and units are randomly assigned to conditions
Me is a mediator measured after X (and before Y)
Y is the dependent variable
3
X Y
Me
c '
a b
Mediation
X Y c
Y i3 c ' X bMe e
3
Y i1 cX e
1
Me i2 aX e
2
4
X Y
Me
c '
a b
Mediation
Y i3 c ' X bMe e
3
Y i1 cX e
1
Me i2 aX e
2
Without a causal argument, these are nothing else than regression equations, not a strong case for mediation
Social psychologists have been very concerned with causality in mediation models (e.g., Spencer, Zanna, & Fong, 2005)
5
Mediation in the MacArthur approach
dXMe e3
Y i1 cX e
1
Me i2 aX e
2
The MacArthur approach (see Kraemer, Kiernan, Essex, & Kupfer, 2008) takes its root in clinical interventions and randomized clinical trials (RCT)
Y i3 c ' X bMe
c, a, and b conjointly significantorc, a, and d conjointly significant
Mediation
6
Moderation in social psychology
Y i4 c
21S
1 c
22P
2 c
23SP e
4
Y (i4 c
22P
2) (c
21 c
23P)S e
4
S Y
P
7
Y i4 c
21S c
22P c
23SP e
4
Y (i4 c
21S) (c
22 c
23S)P e
4
P Y
S
Moderation in social psychology
8
Y i4 c
21S c
22P c
23SP e
4
S Y
P
P Y
S
Social psychologists are fine with both models
Only preferences dictate which one will be used
Moderation in social psychology
Moderation is equated with simply a statistical interaction
9
Y i4 c
21X c
22Mo c
23XMo e
4
X is a treatment and units are randomly assigned to conditions
Mo, the moderator, is measured PRIOR to the treatment
And therefore, the Treatment and the moderator are uncorrelated
Moderation in the Mac Arthur approach
Moderation is not the same as simply a statistical interaction
Y (i4 c
22Mo) (c
21 c
23Mo)X e
4
10
In social psychology:
Definition of moderation
In Mac Arthur Approach:
A moderator P is a variable that affects a S – Y relationship or a moderator S is a variable that affects a P – Y relationship
A moderator is a variable that affects a causal effect of X on Y
11
Can a variable be both a mediator and a moderator?
Y i3 c ' X bMe dXMe e
3
Y i1 cX e
1
Me i2 aX e
2
From a social psychology perspective:
-> Me is a mediator (c, a, and b are conjointly significant)
-> Me is a moderator (the d interaction is significant)
For the MacArthur approach:
-> Me is only a mediator (c, a, and d are conjointly significant)
12
Y i3 c ' X bMe dXMe e
3
X Y
Me
Y i3 bMe (c ' dMe)X e
3
For social psychologists
13
Y i3 c ' X bMe dXMe e
3
Y i3 c ' X (b dX )Me e
3
X Y
Me
This explains why it has been argued that this is a case of moderated mediation (Preacher, Rucker, & Hayes, 2007)
For social psychologists
14
Y i3 c ' X bMe dXMe e
3
X Y
Me
XMe
For the MacArthur approach
15
X Y
Me
X Y
Me
X Y
Me
XMe
Can a variable be both a mediator and a moderator?
Social psychology perspective MacArthur Approach
16
Conclusion
Can a variable be both a mediator and a moderator?
Yes, it can be both if moderation and statistical interactions are equated
No, if moderation and statistical interactions are not equated
How should we define moderation?