CAMPUS PRESENTATION| APRIL 30, 2012 TITAN STUDENT UNION FEASIBILITY STUDY.

C A M P U S P R E S E N T A T I O N | A P R I L 3 0 , 2 0 1 2T I TA N S T U D E N T U N I O N F E A S I B I L I T Y S T U DY

http://www.henriksonowen.com/

PRESENTAT ION OUTL INE

OBJECTIVESPARTICIPATION & PROCESSPROGRAMS AND SERVICESFEE SENSITIVITYSATELLITE OPERATIONSEXISTING CONDITIONSPROJECT CONCEPTNEXT STEPSDISCUSSION


OBJECTIVES PARTICIPATION PROGRAMS & SERVICES FEE SENSITIVITY SATELLITE OPERATIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS PROJECT CONCEPT NEXT STEPS

OB JECT IVE

To provide a comprehensive feasibility study of the options available to the ASI

as it considers expanding the Titan Student Union facilities in order to

improve service delivery to the CSUF campus community.



KEY QUEST IONS

1) Which program elements and services are underserving the campus community and which of these spaces deserves greatest priority in the future expansion of the TSU?

2) What is the fee sensitivity of CSUF students and what scope of the facility expansion could be entertained through the increase of the existing mandatory Campus Union Fee?

3) What other campus locations are students interested in having student union services and should the TSU potentially invest in establishing satellite operations?



KEY QUEST IONS

4) What extent can existing facility mechanical systems can still be utilized and/or which systems upgrades should be considered?

5) What scope of facility expansion can be financially supported through existing ASI resources (cash reserves)?

6) What scope of facility expansion can be financially supported through other contributing resources (e.g., donor funds, debt capacity, 3rd part capital investment, etc.)?



PART IC I PAT ION• Conversations with

approximately 200 students in 10 total focus groups/intercept interviews

• 6,400 completed survey responses– Valid statistical data– Sample

representative of University population


PROGRAMS & SERVICES



FOCUS GR OUPS Many visit the TSU for food during lunch time or to

meet with friends & study; TSU was described as being “good but could be better” and “it feels like an office building”

Spaces & services of the TSU enjoyed by students: Games room, bowling alley, & outdoor courtyard Alumni lounge & meeting rooms for studying Food court options – Panda Express, Juice it Up, &

Togo’s

Spaces & services of the TSU not enjoyed by students:

Student org. offices, Portola Pavilion, & Titan Theater

Inconvenient hours of operation – Food court closed on weekends; not enough seating in food court area



BENCHMAR K ING32,353 38,831 35,250

Functional Areas ASF %-Ttl ASF ASF/Stdnt ASF %-Ttl ASF ASF/Stdnt ASF %-Ttl ASF ASF/Stdnt ASF/Stdnt Grp ASF ASF/Stdnt Grp ASF

Group 1: Food Service 22,797 18.2% 0.7 35,822 19.8% 0.9 19,321 21.7% 0.5 (0.2) (3,476) (0.4) (16,501)

Group 2: Ballroom Facilities 11,725 9.3% 0.4 14,869 8.2% 0.4 14,471 16.3% 0.4 0.0 2,746 0.0 (398)

Group 3: Conference/Meeting Rooms 13,981 11.1% 0.4 20,044 11.1% 0.5 8,695 9.8% 0.2 (0.2) (5,286) (0.3) (11,349)

Group 4: Bookstore 6,375 5.1% 0.2 12,992 7.2% 0.3 0 0.0% 0.0 (0.2) (6,375) (0.3) (12,992)

Group 5: Additional Retail Services 3,004 2.4% 0.1 6,275 3.5% 0.2 1,694 1.9% 0.0 (0.0) (1,310) (0.1) (4,581)

Group 6: Theater/Auditorium 7,206 5.7% 0.2 11,254 6.2% 0.3 2,530 2.8% 0.1 (0.2) (4,676) (0.2) (8,724)

Group 7: Recreation/Entertainment 23,539 18.8% 0.7 11,368 6.3% 0.3 7,971 9.0% 0.2 (0.5) (15,568) (0.1) (3,397)

Group 8: Lounge Space 7,252 5.8% 0.2 12,717 7.0% 0.3 8,451 9.5% 0.2 0.0 1,199 (0.1) (4,266)

Group 9: Academic Related 0 0.0% 0.0 2,582 1.4% 0.1 1,740 2.0% 0.0 0.0 1,740 (0.0) (842)

Group 10: Student Organizations 10,105 8.0% 0.3 14,045 7.7% 0.4 5,466 6.1% 0.2 (0.2) (4,639) (0.2) (8,579)

Group 11: Administrative Offices 7,208 5.7% 0.2 15,903 8.8% 0.4 11,827 13.3% 0.3 0.1 4,619 (0.1) (4,076)

Group 12: Multicultural Centers 1,415 1.1% 0.0 2,103 1.2% 0.1 0 0.0% 0.0 (0.0) (1,415) (0.1) (2,103)

Group 13: Special/Misc. Components 10,931 8.7% 0.3 20,456 11.3% 0.5 6,875 7.7% 0.2 (0.1) (4,056) (0.3) (13,581)

Total Assignable Sq. Footage 125,538 181,265 89,041

Total Gross Sq. Footage 189,930 281,816 140,000

Gross/Net Ratio (Grossing Factor) 1.57 1.59 1.57

Efficiency Factor (% ASF/GSF) 66% 63% 64%

* "Select" data from institutions in B&D / WTW database with comparable mission / enrollment

Select Unions to CSUF Variance

CSU FullertonSelect Unions (n=11)CSU Unions (n=4) Ave Enrollment = Ave Enrollment = Enrollment =

CSU Unions to CSUF Variance

(92,224)

(141,816)

(0.02)

0%-2%

(36,497)

(49,930)

0.00



Q6-23. Please indicate your level of satisfaction with the following amenities and spaces in the TSU (n=7,470):

Students were very satisfied/satisfied most with main level outdoor space, non-food retail, and TSU Food Court dining

Portola PavilionSmall meetings rooms

Titan Pride CenterTitan Theater

Student org. officesTitan Bowl

Large meeting roomsTSU Lower Level dining

Social lounge spacesCasual recreation

Admin. OfficesMainframe Comp. Lab

TSU Food Court seatingQuiet/study lounge spacesLower Level outdoor space

TSU Food Court diningNon-food retail

Main Level outdoor space

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

55%

56%

56%

56%

57%

58%

58%

59%

59%

59%

60%

61%

64%

65%

67%

71%

79%

79%

PROGRAMS & SERV ICES



PROGRAMS & SERV ICES

• TSU Primarily Viewed as a Lunchtime Destination –

Food is a Significant Driver

• Average Student Visits Less Than 2 Times Per Week

• Comfortable Place to Relax, Better Parking, New

Furniture Top Improvements to Increase Use

• Email Kiosks and Commuter Lounge Most Desired

New Spaces

• Price/Value, Food Selection and Variety, Hours of

Operation are Top 3 Areas of Improvement for Food

Service



DEMAND BASED PR OGRAMMING

Demand for drop-in Union Spaces Depth and Breadth Activity Prioritization Space Reconciliation



DEMAND BASED PR OGRAMMINGPriority Peak Space Peak Space Allocation

Category Accommodation Type Demand Based on Prioritization of Demand

1 Quiet Study Lounge first 75% to 85% Sq. Ft. 8,231 6,200 to 7,000

2 Food Service - Lunch first 75% to 85% Sq. Ft. 9,239 6,900 to 7,900

3 Convenience Store first 75% to 85% Sq. Ft. 865 649 to 735

4 Commuter Lounge second 55% to 65% Sq. Ft. 7,678 4,200 to 5,000

5 Informal Outdoor Social Space second 55% to 65% Sq. Ft. 9,867 5,400 to 6,400

6 Coffee House second 55% to 65% Sq. Ft. 2,533 1,400 to 1,600

7 Copy/Print Center second 55% to 65% Sq. Ft. 1,176 600 to 800

8 Informal Lounge / Gathering second 55% to 65% Sq. Ft. 6,549 3,600 to 4,300

9 Grab and Go - Lunch third 40% to 50% Sq. Ft. 1,476 600 to 700

10 Small Group Study Rooms third 40% to 50% Sq. Ft. 4,159 1,700 to 2,100

11 Grab and Go - Breakfast third 40% to 50% Sq. Ft. 835 334 to 418

12 Food Service - Breakfast third 40% to 50% Sq. Ft. 3,108 1,200 to 1,600

13 Bookstore third 40% to 50% Sq. Ft. 1,324 500 to 700

14 Food Service - Dinner fourth 25% to 35% Sq. Ft. 2,864 700 to 1,000

15 Crafts / Arts Center fourth 25% to 35% Sq. Ft. 4,907 1,200 to 1,700

16 Student Organization Work Space fourth 25% to 35% Sq. Ft. 1,870 500 to 700

17 Dance / Nightclub Venue fifth 10% to 20% Sq. Ft. 7,772 800 to 1,600

18 Grab and Go - Dinner fifth 10% to 20% Sq. Ft. 571 57 to 114

19 Theater / Auditorium fifth 10% to 20% Sq. Ft. 3,986 400 to 800

20 Art Gallery fifth 10% to 20% Sq. Ft. 1,451 100 to 300

21 Multipurpose Ballroom fifth 10% to 20% Sq. Ft. 1,550 200 to 300

1 COMBINED 1: Quiet Lounge, Informal Lounge, Commuter Lounge 22,500 14,000 to 16,300

2 COMBINED 1: Food Service & Grab and Go - Lunch 10,700 7,500 to 8,600

Activity

Population is based on current CSUF enrollment.



DEMAND BASED PR OGRAMMING

01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,0008,0009,000

Sq. F

t.

Quiet Study Lounge

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

Sq. F

t.

Coffee House

01,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

Sq. F

t.

Commuter Lounge

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

Sq. F

t.

Informal Lounge / Gathering

0200400600800

1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,000

Sq. F

t.

Student Organization Work Space



DEMAND BASED PR OGRAMMINGSpace Demand Existing

Type Difference1 Quiet Study Lounge Sq. Ft. 6,200 to 7,000 2,918 (3,282) to (4,082)

2 Food Service - Lunch Sq. Ft. 6,900 to 7,900 7,342 442 to (558)

3 Convenience Store Sq. Ft. 649 to 735 600 (49) to (135)

4 Commuter Lounge Sq. Ft. 4,200 to 5,000 0 (4,200) to (5,000)

5 Informal Outdoor Social Space Sq. Ft. 5,400 to 6,400 4,168 (1,232) to (2,232)

6 Coffee House Sq. Ft. 1,400 to 1,600 942 (458) to (658)

7 Copy/Print Center Sq. Ft. 600 to 800 0 (600) to (800)

8 Informal Lounge / Gathering Sq. Ft. 3,600 to 4,300 4,995 1,395 to 695

9 Grab and Go - Lunch Sq. Ft. 600 to 700 0 (600) to (700)

10 Small Group Study Rooms Sq. Ft. 1,700 to 2,100 438 (1,262) to (1,662)

*Surplus / (Deficit)

"Food Service - Lunch" includes all food court seating.

Activity

Population is based on current CSUF enrollment.



PROGRAM AREAS

Lounge Spaces – 6,000nsf to 8,000nsf

Student Organization Spaces – 5,000nsf to

7,000nsf

Conference & Meeting Rooms – 5,000nsf to

8,000nsf

Multicultural Center Space – 1,000nsf to

2,000nsf

Study Space – 1,000nsf to 1,500nsf

Food Service Seating – 1,000 to 1,500nsf

Support Space – 8,000nsf to 12,000nsf


FEE SENSITIVITY



FEE SENS IT IV I TYThe approval of Option A ($85 to $95 per semester) would offer :

An expansion of approximately 60,000 gross square feet (nearly half of the size of

the current TSU) and be able to include all of the spaces below:

Dedicated informal lounges with soft seating, tables, and study areas,

Small group study rooms,

Dedicated spaces for student organizations and clubs,

State of the art meeting rooms for clubs and organizations,

Expanded food court, and

Additional ballroom for large campus events.

Additionally, the Titan Student Union would undergo a moderate renovation of nearly

70% of existing spaces. This renovation would bring portions of the facility up to

the same standards and feel of the expansion. Some of these renovated spaces

could include the entry lobby, courtyard, meeting rooms, and food court.



FEE SENS IT IV I TY

17%

32%

25%

27%

Very likely

Likely

Unlikely

Very unlikely

$50 - $60 - Option B

$85 - $95 - Option A

13%25%

29%

33%

Very likely

Likely

Unlikely

Very unlikely

$20 - $30 - Option C

32%

34%15%

19%Very likely

Likely

Unlikely

Very unlikely



FEE SENS IT IV I TYQ80. Which option to improve the TSU do you prefer? (n=6,480)

The preferred option is a tuition increase of $20 to $30 per semester.

16%

18%

29%

24%

12%

Option A - $85 to $95 per semes-ter

Option B - $50 to $60 per semes-ter

Option C - $20 to $30 per semes-ter

None of the above options

I need more information



Q84. How high a priority should CSUF place on improving the TSU? (n=6,437)

58% of All Students said improving the TSU is a Moderate to High Priority

Very high priority High priority Moderate priority Low priority Very low priority0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

9%

18%

45%

19%

9%7%

14%

43%

22%

14%

7%

16%

39%

23%

15%

Underclassmen Upperclassmen Graduate

FEE SENS IT IV I TY



Q82. If CSUF improves the TSU to better meet your needs, how often would you use it? (n=6,462)

The number of visits per week would increase an additional 42% for all students from 1.9 to 2.7 times/week – Largest increase

would be from non-core users

FEE SENS IT IV I TY

5 or more times per week

2 - 4 times per week

Once per week Less than once per week

Never0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

10%

33%

20%

28%

9%

5 or more times per week

2 - 4 times per week

Once per week Less than once per week

Never0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

18%

46%

17%

13%

6%

Before Improvements

After Improvements


SATELLITE OPERATIONS



S ATELL I TE OPERAT IONS Students are most commonly in

McCarthy or Mihaylo Hall throughout the day; however, largest number of students leaves the campus from 5PM-8PM

Mihaylo Hall provides coffee shop/grab-n-go food concept (Starbucks) with lounge and table seating on 1st floor

Potential opportunity to provide convenience store concept or lounge space near McCarthy Hall, limited need for other union spaces


EXISTING CONDITIONS



ARCH ITECTURAL ASSESSMENT

Disjointed Wayfinding, Stratification of Levels, Separation of Quiet Versus Loud Areas

Disjointed Circulation, Multiple Stairs No Central Node, Gathering Space, Building Focal

Point Underutilized Lower Level – Garden Courtyard Compartmentalized Second Floor Food Court Kitchens Require Significant

Investment



MECHAN ICAL ASSESSMENT

Existing TSC Plant Does Not Have Capacity to Accommodate Expansion

Requires New Systems, Connection to Univ, or New Plant

16 AHUs are Obsolete and Will Need Replacement Systems Controls are Outdated Single Pane Glazing Should be Replaced with

Efficient, Low-E, Double-Glazing Heating and Cooling in Cooking Areas Not

Properly Addressed



ELECTR ICAL / P LUMB ING ASSESSMENT

Electrical Capacity at Panels is Maxed Out Older Lighting Fixtures Have Already Been

Replaced With New Old Pipes are Creating Domestic Hot Water Issues Only Portions of the TSU are Sprinklered


PROJECT CONCEPTS



CONCEPT DR IVER S

Address Program Shortfalls Align with Budget Maximize Value of Improvement to Existing and

New Spaces



EXPANS ION POTENT IAL

TSUBook-store

CPAC

Rec Center

Vis Arts

Focus on Southeast Corner of TSU

Capture Lower Games Court

Redefine Entry/Focal Point

Work with Existing Building Perceptions- Quiet / Loud

Improve Connection to Bookstore and Campus Arteries



NO FEE INCREASEQuantity Unit NASF

Lounge Spaces / Information DeskInformal Lounge Space 1 2,000 2,000Small Group Study Rooms 6 350 2,100Commuter Lounge 1 1,500 1,500Internet / Email Stations 0 25 0Print Stations 0 25 0

Total: 5,600Food Service

Kitchen and Servery 1 1,000 1,000Coffeehouse 0 1,500 0

Total: 1,000Meeting Spaces

Meeting / Conference Room - Very Large 0 2,000 0Meeting / Conference Room - Large 2 1,200 2,400Meeting / Conference Room - Small 2 400 800Meeting / Conference Room Storage 4 100 400

Total: 3,600Student Organizations

Student Organizations Open Plan Workstations 12 80 960Conference / Meeting Room 1 250 250Open Seating / Lounge 1 800 800Storage Lockers - Double Tier 15" 100 4 400

Total: 2,410Additional Spaces

Multicultural Center 0 1,200 0Support and Auxiliary Spaces 1 500 500

Total: 500

Total Student Union Facilities SF 13,110Efficiency Factor: 67% 6,555

Total Student Union Facilities SF 19,665

Total NASF

New Construction Only, No Renovation

Addresses Some Needs of Student Community

TSU Infrastructure Issues Still Remain

$6M Construction Cost $10M Project Cost

Reserve Funded Opens Fall 2016



ENR OLLMENT H ISTORY FR OM 1970

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

2024

2026

2028

2030

Fall Headcount

TSU Opens

Expansion Opens

21,500 24,400 Today

36,100

Project Opens

36,000



FEE COMPAR ISONInstitution Fee / Year

Chico State $746San Jose State $648Cal Poly $627Northridge $506San Diego State $457Bakersfield $435Sonoma State $402Sacramento State $398Long Beach State $336

Avg. (excluding CSUF): $506CSUF: $268

*Based on Fall 2012 Figures



$30 / SEM FEE INCR EASEQuantity Unit NASF

Lounge Spaces / Information DeskInformal Lounge Space 1 2,700 2,700Small Group Study Rooms 8 350 2,800Commuter Lounge 1 2,250 2,250Internet / Email Stations 5 25 125Print Stations 5 25 125

Total: 8,000Food Service

Kitchen and Servery 1 1,000 1,000Coffeehouse 1 1,500 1,500

Total: 2,500Meeting Spaces

Meeting / Conference Room - Very Large 1 2,000 2,000Meeting / Conference Room - Large 3 1,200 3,600Meeting / Conference Room - Small 2 400 800Meeting / Conference Room Storage 6 100 600

Total: 7,000Student Organizations

Student Organizations Open Plan Workstations 25 80 2,000Conference / Meeting Room 2 250 500Open Seating / Lounge 1 1,200 1,200Storage Lockers - Double Tier 15" 200 4 800

Total: 4,500Additional Spaces

Multicultural Center 1 1,200 1,200Support and Auxiliary Spaces 1 1,500 1,500

Total: 2,700

Total Student Union Facilities SF 24,700Efficiency Factor: 67% 12,350

Total Student Union Facilities SF 37,050

Total NASF

$11.1M in New Construction

$5.6M in Renovation $2.1M for Food

Service $2.9M for

Infrastructure $1M for Site / Bookstore

Connection

$32.2M Project Cost


STUDENT LOUNGE

STUDENT LOUNGE COMMUTER LOUNGE

GROUP STUDY ROOMS

GROUP STUDY AREA

GROUP STUDY AREA

STUDENT ORG LOUNGE

STUDENT ORG WORK AREA STUDENT ORG WORK AREA

MULTICULTURAL CENTER


PRO JECT COSTS $30 Per Semester

Increase Collections Start Fall

2013 Reserves Contribute

$10 M Opens Fall 2017

Tax-exempt Interest Rate 5.00% Project Budget (Form 2-7) $32,276,275

Term Tax-Exempt (Years) 30 Early Fee Funds $8,057,000

Cap Interest (as a % of Budget) 0.0% Capital Contribution $10,000,000

Average Balance Reinvested 45% Existing TSU Debt $3,000,000

Reinvestment Rate 0.50% Total Budget to be Serviced by Debt $17,219,275

Average Amount Reinvested $10,898,674

Reinvestment Period (months) 9 Capitalized Interest $0

Reinvestment Proceeds $40,870 Cap Interest Earnings $0

Reinvestment Proceeds / Const. Acct Earnings ($41,000)

Issuance Costs 1.00% Issuance Costs $172,000

Cap I Interest Earnings 0.50% Total Project Budget $17,350,000

Total Previously Collected: $8,057,000

Annual Debt Service $1,129,000

Debt Service


Revenues Total

General Services $291,972Building Engineering $18,000University Conference Center $150,792Titan Bowl & Bil l iards $179,564Graphic Services $17,305Mainframe Computer Lounge $13,131

Information / Services $73,388Marketing & Public Relations $96,292Operations $46,773Titan Recreation $450,548

Totals: $1,337,765Expenses Total

General Services $1,889,174

Building Engineering $1,430,126Administration $263,451University Conference Center $299,353Titan Bowl & Bil l iards $189,169Graphic Services $185,606Art & Exhibit Program $17,308Mainframe Computer Lounge $50,831TSC Governing Board $64,484Dell Capital Lease $45,457Programming Support $102,055Information / Services $214,169Marketing & Public Relations $216,185Operations $1,115,483Titan Recreation $1,843,715Emerg. Preparedness & Response $13,755

Totals: $7,940,321($6,602,556)

Operating Budget (2011/2012) Year of Operations 2011/2012Academic Year

TCUOP

Starting Balance $16,842,908

Bad Debt Reserve $48,340

Interest $49,783

Contributions $9,191,460

Deductions $8,386,566

Total $17,745,925

TCUCE


Bad Debt Reserve $0

Interest $8,201

Contributions $0

Deductions $0

Total $3,039,703

TCUMR


Bad Debt Reserve $0

Interest $7,767

Contributions $400,000

Deductions $0

Total $3,201,846

TCUCN


Bad Debt Reserve $0

Interest $7,490

Contributions $350,000

Deductions $0

Total $3,065,900

2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6

IncomeTotal Existing $1,462,000 $1,491,000 $1,521,000 $1,552,000 $1,582,000 $1,615,000Total New $35,000 $36,000 $36,000 $37,000 $38,000 $38,000

TOTAL INCOME $1,497,000 $1,527,000 $1,557,000 $1,589,000 $1,620,000 $1,653,000

ExpensesTotal Existing $8,681,000 $8,856,000 $9,033,000 $9,211,000 $9,396,000 $9,583,000Total New $514,000 $524,000 $535,000 $544,000 $556,000 $566,000

TOTAL EXPENSES $9,195,000 $9,380,000 $9,568,000 $9,755,000 $9,952,000 $10,149,000

Profit / (Subsidy) ($7,698,000) ($7,853,000) ($8,011,000) ($8,166,000) ($8,332,000) ($8,496,000)

Fee SubsidyExisting TSU Fee $9,291,000 $9,469,000 $9,650,000 $9,834,000 $10,023,000 $10,215,000New TSU Fee $2,077,000 $2,117,000 $2,157,000 $2,199,000 $2,241,000 $2,284,000

TOTAL FEES $11,368,000 $11,586,000 $11,807,000 $12,033,000 $12,264,000 $12,499,000

NET OPERATING INCOME $3,670,000 $3,733,000 $3,796,000 $3,867,000 $3,932,000 $4,003,000

Debt ServiceExisting TSU Debt $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0New TSU Debt $1,129,000 $1,129,000 $1,129,000 $1,129,000 $1,129,000 $1,129,000Existing Rec Debt $1,703,000 $1,706,000 $1,703,000 $1,704,000 $1,702,000 $1,704,000

TOTAL DEBT SERVICE $2,832,000 $2,835,000 $2,832,000 $2,833,000 $2,831,000 $2,833,000

Debt Coverage Ratio 1.30 1.32 1.34 1.36 1.39 1.41

CASH FLOW AFTER DEBT SERVICE $838,000 $898,000 $964,000 $1,034,000 $1,101,000 $1,170,000


R ISKS /UNKNOWNS

Campus Enrollment Growth Projected at 0% for the Next Years, the

Increasing Construction and Operations Inflation Existing TSU Debt Service Payments

Opportunities to Fund Through Reserves Refinance


NEXT STEPS



NEXT STEPS

Develop an Information Campaign to Education Students AND Faculty/Staff About Why the TSU Needs Improving

Timeline Committees Marketing Materials Presentations Partnerships



NEXT STEPS

Identify Partners to Contribute Additional Funds or Other Nearby Improvements

ASC / Bookstore Third-Party Vendor Additional Funding will Allow for Additional

Improvements to the Existing TSU


C A M P U S P R E S E N T A T I O N | A P R I L 3 0 , 2 0 1 2T I TA N S T U D E N T U N I O N F E A S I B I L I T Y S T U DY


CAMPUS PRESENTATION| APRIL 30, 2012 TITAN STUDENT UNION FEASIBILITY STUDY.

Documents

Transcript of CAMPUS PRESENTATION| APRIL 30, 2012 TITAN STUDENT UNION FEASIBILITY STUDY.