California Children’s Services Program: Title V Needs Assessment … · 2019-10-11 · California...
Transcript of California Children’s Services Program: Title V Needs Assessment … · 2019-10-11 · California...
California Children’s Services Program: Title V Needs Assessment 2018-2019
Jennifer Rienks, PhD, Adrienne Shatara, MPH, Linda Remy, PhD, & Gerry Oliva, MD, MPH, Family Health Outcomes Project at the University of California, San Francisco
Sept. 25, 2019 Sacramento, CA
Today’s Objec/ves
• SummarizetheNeedsAssessment(NA)process,ac7vi7esandkeyfindings
• Reviewcriteriaforpriori7zingproblems/issuesforprogramimprovements
• Review,refineandpriori7zeproblems/issuesforISCDtoaddressinthenextfiveyears
• DiscussnextstepsandsolicitvolunteersforworkgroupstodevelopTitleV2021-2025Ac7onPlan
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 2
Acronyms
• AAP=AmericanAcademyofPediatrics• CM=CaseManagers• CSHCN=ChildrenwithSpecialHealthCareNeeds• CYSCHN=ChildrenandYouthwithSpecialHealthCareNeeds• DHCS=DepartmentofHealthCareServices• HHA=HomeHealthAgency• ISCD=IntegratedSystemsofCareDivisionintheDepartmentofHealthCareServices
• MCHB=MaternalChildHealthBureau• MCP=Medi-CalManagedCarePlan• PT=PhysicalTherapists• OT=Occupa7onalTherapists• SARs=ServicesAuthoriza7onRequest• SDOH=SocialDeterminantsofHealth• WCM=WholeChildModel
CSHCN Six Core Objec/ves From MCHB-HRSA
1. FamiliesofCSHCNarepartnersindecision-makingatalllevels,andaresa7sfiedwiththeservicestheyreceive
2. CSHCNreceivecoordinatedongoingcomprehensivecarewithinamedicalhome
3. AllCSHCNwillbeadequatelyinsuredfortheservicestheyneed
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 4
CSHCN Six Core Objec/ves (cont.)
4. Childrenarescreenedearlyandcon;nuouslyforspecialhealthcareneeds
5. ServicesforCSHCNwillbeorganizedsofamiliescanusethemeasily
6. Allyouthwithspecialneedswillreceiveservicesneededtosupportthetransi;ontoadulthood
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 5
Needs Assessment Process
CCS Needs Assessment and Ac/on Plan Goals
• Withinbudgetandlegisla7veconstraints,determineAc#onpriori7estobeaddressedduringFY2021-2025
• Iden7fythemostimportantandpoten7allyeffec7vechangesCCScanmaketoimproveservicesforCCS-eligiblechildrenandthesystemsthatsupportCSHCN
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 7
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 8
TitleVAssessmentandPlanningCycle
Convene Stakeholders Group
Assess the Needs of CCS Families
and Identify Program Issues
Set Priorities Among Identified
Needs/Issues
Analyze Problems and Develop Intervention
Strategies
Develop Five-Year Action Plan
Implement Identified Strategies/Interventions
Monitor Objectives and Performance Indicators
Convene Stakeholders Group
Stakeholdersrepresenta7veofkeyinterestgroups:
• Families
• CCSCountyPrograms
• Provider/Community/AdvocacyOrganiza7ons
• ManagedCarePlans
• Government/StateAgencies
• Academia
Stakeholdersprovideinputinallaspectsoftheneedsassessmentandwilldecidepriori7es
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 9
Assess the Needs of CCS Families and Iden/fy Program Issues
• WorkedwithStakeholderstoiden7fykeyissuesandexis7ngdatasources
• Collectedaddi7onaldatainanitera7veprocess:◦ KeyInformantInterviews◦ FocusGroups◦ OnlineSurveys
• ReviewedalldataandfindingswithStakeholdersviawebinars(4)andmee7ngsandconferencecallswithSubcommigees(12+)
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 10
Key Informant Interviews
• Withthekeyinformantinterviewsubcommigee◦ Developedinterviewguideandques7ons◦ Iden7fiedandrecruitedpar7cipants
• 16KeyInformantinterviewswithapprox.20individualsconductedfromOctobertoDecember2018
• Par7cipantsincludedMDs,CCSProgramstaff,reps.fromchildren’shospitals,aWCMHealthPlan,professionalorganiza7ons,otherDHCSdepartmentreps.
UCSF FAMILY HEALTH OUTCOMES PROJECT 11
Focus Groups
• Workedwithfocusgroupsubcommigee◦ Developedinterviewguideandques7ons◦ Iden7fiedtypesofgroupsandrecruitedpar7cipants
• 9focusgroupswereconductedbetweenNovember2018andFebruary2019◦ CCSfamilies(26par7cipants)
! 2groupsinSouthernCA,1groupinNorthernCA◦ CCSproviders(25-30par7cipants)
! 2groupsinSouthernCA,1groupinNorthernCA◦ CCSadministrators(20-25par7cipants)◦ 1groupNorthernCA,1groupwithCCSAdministratorsfromWCMCoun7es
◦ WCMHealthPlans(8par7cipants)
UCSF FAMILY HEALTH OUTCOMES PROJECT 12
Online Surveys
! Workedwithsurveysubcommigee◦ Developed3surveysusinginforma7onfromstakeholders,keyinformants,andfocusgroups◦ Recruitedrespondentstocompletethesurveys
! CSHCNFamilySurvey-3,419responsesfromCCSfamiliesusedinPRELIMINARYanalyses,numberofresponsesfromnon-CCSCSHCNtobedetermined◦ AdministeredinEnglishandSpanish
! CCSProviderSurvey-188responses! CCSAdministratorSurvey-44responsesrepresen7ng39Coun7es
UCSF FAMILY HEALTH OUTCOMES PROJECT 13
Family Survey: Region, Demographics, and Survey Method
Whoaskedyoutocompletethissurvey? %CountyCCS 74.2HealthPlan 24.5LocalFamilyResourceCenter 0.7FamilyVoices 0.1ChildrenNow 0.0Mychild’sdoctor 0.5Missing 15.4
Howdidyoucompletethissurvey? %AtCCSaspartofannualpaperwork 5.3Atmychild’sspecialist 1.4Byphone(someonecalledme) 54.8Bycomputer(SurveyMonkey) 11.0Bysmartphone(SurveyMonkey) 12.7InterviewedoverphoneinEnglish 8.0InterviewedoverphoneinSpanish 6.3Interviewedoverphoneotherlanguage 0.6Missing 12.5
Region % #NorthMountain 11.4 391 BayArea 25.1 857 Sacramento 4.7 162 CentralCoast 3.9 133 SanJoaquin 4.4 152 LosAngeles 2.2 75 Orange 1.1 37 SanDiego 4.5 154 Southeast 42.5 1,452 Missing 0.2 6
White 22.6 Black 5.0 Hispanic 55.4 Asian/PI 7.0 AIAN/Other/Mul7 6.3 Missing 3.7
Family Survey: Demographics and Survey Method
Child’sAge %Newborn-5 30.7 6-10 24.4 11-13 14.2 14-16 14.0 17-21 16.3 Missing 0.5
Income %Lt$20,000 18.6 $20,000-$34,999 25.2 $35,000-$49,999 14.5 $50,000-$74,999 8.1 $75,000-99,999 3.0 $100,000orover 5.3 Missing 25.4
Highestlevelofeduca7oncompletedbysurvey
respondent %Middleschool 6.4 Somehighschool 10.1 HighschoolorGED 23.8 Somecollege 26.1 Collegebachelordegree 10.0 Graduatelevelorhigher 5.1 Missing 18.5
Provider Survey Respondents (N = 188)
IncludedPediatriciansandPediatricSubspecialists;NursesandNursePrac77oners;Physical,Occupa7onalandSpeechTherapists;SocialWorkers,andOthers(Die77ans,CaseManagers,TherapyAssistants)
50%arecurrentlyCCS-Paneled
Prac7ceSepng % Ter7aryMedicalCenter(Non-Kaiser) 9.2 Children’sHospital 21.3 KaiserTer7aryMedicalCenter 10.9 Stand-alonespecialtyclinic 8.1 Primarycareprac7ce(private) 2.9 Primarycareprac7ce(public) 2.9 FederallyQualifiedHealthCenter(FQHC) 7.5 Other*(pleasespecify) 53.5
* Other setting is most frequently a Medical Therapy Unit (MTU)
%ofPrac7cethatareCCSPa7ents %
0-25% 17.7% 26-50% 14.9% 51-75% 10.3% 76-100% 51.4% Don’tknow/Notsure 5.7%
CCS Administrator Survey Respondents
• 44responsesrepresen7ng39Coun7es• Currentposi7onsofrespondentsincludeCCSAdministrators,Programmanagers,PublicHealthNurses,DirectorsofChildren’sMedicalServices,DirectorsofNursing
• Yearsincurrentposi7onrangefrom1monthto20years,about25%havebeenintheircurrentposi7onfor10yearsormore
Priori/za/on Criteria
Criteria for Priori/za/on of Issues/Problems
1. Reviewpriori7za7oncriteriadevelopedbyWorkgroup
2. Voteonweightsforcriteria
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 19
Next Step: Develop Five-Year Ac/on Plan Timeline: October 2019 - February 2020
• Solicitstakeholders’inputforac7onplans
• WorkwithCCSstateandlocalstafftodevelopgoalsandSMART(Specific,Measurable,Achievable,Realis7c,andTime-bound)objec7ves
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 20
Criteria Development Process
• Stakeholdersprovidedinputonselec7nganddefiningcriteriaatini7alstakeholdermee7ng
• Subsequentworkgroupwebinarsselectedmanageablenumberofcriteria,andfurtherdevelopedandrefinedselectedcriteria
• Currenttask–voteonweightsforthecriteriathatwillbeusedtopriori7zeproblems/issuestobeaddressedinnextfiveyears
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 21
Priori/za/on Criterion 1
Whatistheimpactonchildren’s(CYSHCN)healthofaddressingtheissue/problem?Defini;on/Concept:Theimpactsofaddressingtheissuecanrangefromnoimpactonfamilyorthesystem,tomoderate(e.g.reduc7onindelaysincare),tolarge(e.g.preven7ngdeathorpermanentdisability,prolonginglifeorimprovingqualityoflife).Healthimpactsincludephysicalandmentalhealthaswellastheoverallqualityoflifeforthechild,theirfamily,andtheircommunity.
Ra;ngScale:
• 0=Noimpact
• 1=Smallimpact,reduceshindrancesthatdon’treallyhavelong-term,nega7veconsequences
• 2=Moderateimpact,reducesdifficul7es(e.g.reducesdelaysincare)butonlyshort-term,posi7veimpact
• 3=Severe/Largeimpact,reducesormi7gateslong-term,nega7veimpacts(e.g.preventsdeathorpermanentdisability)
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 22
Priori/za/on Criterion 2
Doesaddressingtheissuereducedispari;esinhealthcareaccessand/orhealthoutcomes?Defini;on/Concept:Oneormorepopula7onsubgroupsofCYSHCNasdefinedbyrace/ethnicity,income,insurancestatus,gender,geography,ordiagnosishaveworseaccessand/orpoorerhealthoutcomesthanthegeneralgroup,andthataddressingtheproblemwouldreducedisparity.
Ra;ngScale:
• 0=AddressingtheissueDOESNOTreducedispari7esinhealthaccess/outcomes
• 1=AddressingtheissueDOESminimallyreducedispari7esinhealthaccess/outcomes
• 2=AddressingtheissueDOESmoderatelyreducedispari7esinhealthaccess/outcomes
• 3=AddressingtheissueDOESsignificantlyreducedispari7esinhealthaccess/outcomes
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 23
Priori/za/on Criterion 3
Dowehave,orcanweaccess,thefinancialresourcestodowhatisneededtosucceed?Defini;on/Concept:Financialresources=fundsfromFederal,State,andLocalgovernment;founda7ongrants;partnercontribu7ons/investment;etc.Ra;ngScale:
• 0=Nofinancialresources• 1=Somefinancialresources• 2=Availableresourcesincomplete,e.g.wehavethecapacitybutneedtofindthefinancialresources;wehavethefinancialresourcesbutneedtobuildcapacity
• 3=Adequatefinancialresources
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 24
Priori/za/on Criterion 4
Dowehavethecapacityandwilltodowhatisneededtosucceed?Defini;on/Concept:Capacity/willincludeshavingallofthefollowingfactors:theresources(includinginfrastructure,personnel,and/ortrainingcapacity),poli7calwill,parental/familywill,communitywill,poten7altobuildonexis7ngefforts,andthepoten7alforpartnerships.
Ra;ngScale:
• 0=Nocapacity,nowill• 1=Somecapacityorsomewill,butnotboth
• 2=Strongcapacityorstrongwill,butnotboth• 3=StrongcapacityANDstrongwill
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 25
Priori/za/on Criterion 5
Arethereevidence-basedorbestprac;cestrategiestoaddresstheissue?Defini;on/Concept:Evidence-basedmeanssupportinresearch/evalua7onliterature.Bestprac7ceshavenotbeenformallyvalidatedbutarerecommendedbyexpertsorbyinformalevalua7onsoflocal,stateorna7onalprograms.
Ra;ngScale• 0=Therearenobestprac7cesavailable• 1=Therearebestprac7cestrategiesavailable,buttheyarenotyetevidence-based
• 2=Therearesomeevidence-basedstrategiesthatcouldbeimplemented
• 3=Thereareevidence-basedstrategiesthathaveabroadimpact
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 26
Priori/za/on Criterion 6
Willaddressingtheissueeasetheburdenonfamilies?Defini;on/Concept:Burdensthatfamiliescanfaceinclude:social,economic,emo7onal,psychological,physical,geographic/transporta7on,etc.Someexamplesofaddressingissuesthatcandecreasefamilyburdeninclude:in-homesupport,respitecare,supportgroups,7melyreceiptofservicesandsupplies.Ra;ngScale:
• 0=Notlikely• 1=Somewhatlikelytoeasetheburden• 2=Likelytoeaseburden• 3=Verylikely
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 27
Sample Priori/za/on Tool INSTRUCTIONS:Belowisabrieflis;ngofeachofthecriterionthatyouwillbeusingtorateeachofthepoten;alpriori;es,andtheweightsforeachcriterioninthebluebox.PleaserefertoandusetheaccompanyingPRIORITIZATIONCRITERIAsheetfordetailsonthecriterionandscoringdefini;ons,and,foreachpriority,putinascoreforeachofthecriterion(0-4)intheboxesbelow.Aformulaisusedtothattakeseachofyourcriterionscores,mul;plyitbyitsweight,andthenaddthemalltogetherforatotalscoreforeachpriority.
Criterion#1:Whatistheimpactonchildren’s(CYSHCN)healthofaddressingtheissue/problem?
Criterion#4:Dowehavethecapacityandwilltodowhatisneededtosucceed?
Criterion#2:Doesaddressingtheissuereducedispari;esinhealthcareaccessand/orhealthoutcomes?
Criterion#5:Arethereevidence-basedorbestprac;cestrategiestoaddresstheissue?
Criterion#3:Dowehave,orcanweaccessthefinancialresourcestodowhatisneededtosucceed?
Criterion#6:Willaddressingtheissueeasetheburdenonfamilies?
Poten;alPriorityC1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
TotalScoreTBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vo/ng on Criterion Weights
• Thera7ngscalesonthepreviousslidesaredesignedtoallowustoevaluatehowwelleachiden7fiedproblemmeetseachcriterion
• Weightsareusedtocomparethecriteriawitheachothertodeterminewhicharethemostimportant
• Weigh7ngcriteriaallowyoutogivesomecriteriamoreweightthanothersingenera7ngascorewithwhichtodeterminewhichproblemsCCSshouldaddress.Weuseascaleof0to4,with4beingthemostimportant
• Weigh7ngcriteriashouldresultinlargerdistribu7onofrankingofpriori7es
To Vote on Criteria Weights Online:
• hgps://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CCS_CrWeight
Summary of Key Findings
Goal 1: Families Are Partners
• MCHBOutcome:Familiesofchildrenandyouthwithspecialhealthcareneedspartnerindecision-makingatalllevels,andaresa7sfiedwiththeservicestheyreceive.
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 32
Families Are Partners: What We Heard
• ManyparentsverygratefulforCCS,andfocusgrouppar7cipantswerepar7cularlythankfulthattheDHCS/ISCDhadFHOPconductfocusgroupsaspartoftheneedsassessment
• ParentsareconfidentinCCSproviders
• Parentswhohavelivedtheexperiencecanhelpotherparentsnavigatethesystems,learnwhattoexpect,andprovidesupport
• Moreparentgroupsandparentsupportareneeded
• ThereisnostatutorylanguagespecifyingthatwhenachildqualifiesforCCSservices,thelocalFamilyResourceCenterwillbesentareferraltofollowupwiththefamily(thisdoeshappenwhenachildreceivesRegionalCenterservices)
• SomeconfusionaboutwhatservicesCCScoversandwhatMedi-Calcovers,moreconfusionforthosewithCCSandprivateinsurance
• “CCShasbeenabighelp,majorsurgeryat[localchildren’shospital]recentlythatwentreallywell.TheOTsandPTsaregreatandveryknowledgeableabouttheMDsat[localchildren’shospital].Nocomplaintsaboutthem.Onlythingthatishardformeisthattheydon’thaveazerhoursfortherapy(OT),hehasbeenmissingschoolandgepngdepressedbecauseheisn’tdoingwellinschool.”
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 33
Families Are Partners: What We Heard
InFamilyFocusGroups:
• Themajorityoffamiliesemphasizedtheimportanceoftheirrela7onshipsw/CMs
• Forthemostpart,familiesfeeltheyaretheprimarycoordinatorsofcare.
• Whenitisn’tjustthem,therapistsfromMTUsorspecialistsweremen7onedmostassome7mesalsocoordina7ngcare;whenaskedwhocoordinatescarefortheirchild,oneparentsaid:
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 34
“Wedo!Parentscoordinatecarefortheirchildren.Butbeyondthat,MTUsseemtohaveyearlycareplans.Physicianshavecareplansforspecificdiagnoses,butnotspecifictothechild.CCSneverprovidesuswithacareplan.”
Families as Partners: Family Survey Doyouandyourdoctor/providerworktogetheraspartnerstomakehealthcaredecisions? %Always 65.9 Usually 20.9 Some7mes 9.2 Never 4.0
Doyouandyourdoctor/providertalkabouttherangeoftreatmentandcarechoicesforyourchild/youth? %Always 66.8 Usually 20.3 Some7mes 9.5 Never 3.4
Howozendidyourchild’sdoctorand/orotherhealthcareprovidersspendenough7mewithyouandyourchild? %Always 64.6 Usually 25.7 Some7mes 8.2 Never 1.5
Doesyourproviderhonoryourrequestsforothers(extendedfamily,communityelders,faithleadersortradi7onalhealersthataredesignatedbythefamily)topar7cipateintheprocessthatleadstodecisionsaboutcare? %Always 59.7 Usually 20.1 Some7mes 7.8 Never 12.4
Haveyourchild’sdoctorsorotherhealthcareprovidersworkedwithyouandthischildtocreateawrigenplantomeetthechild’shealthgoalsandneeds? %Yes 66.6 No 21.3 Donotknow 12.1
Families Are Partners: Provider Survey
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 36
29.3%31.6%
21.3%
4.0% 2.9%
10.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
FamilieswouldbenefitfromCountyCCSprogramsbeingrequiredtoconvenefamily
advisorycommigees
StronglyAgree SomewhatAgree Neutral
SomewhatDisagree StronglyDisagree Don’tKnow/NotSure
Case Management: Family Survey
Hasyourchild/familybeenassignedacasemanager?
%
Yes 46.8 No 20.6 Donotknow 22.9 Missing 9.7 Ifcasemanagerassigned,how
sa7sfiedhaveyoubeeninthepast12monthswithhowyourcasemanagerhelpsyourchildconnectwithservices?
%
Always 71.4
Usually 21.7
Some7mes 5.9
Never 1.0
Ifcasemanagerassigned,whatagency?Checkallthatapply.
%
CountyCCS 73.7 HealthPlan 6.2 RegionalCenter 19.6 CCSSpecialCareCenter 18.9 Other 6.9 Missing 1.9
Sa/sfac/on with CCS and Health Plan: Family Survey
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 38
Overall,howsa7sfiedareyouwiththeCCSprogramonascaleof0(notatall)to10(very)?
%
0to5 4.8 6to8 24.6 9 10.8 10 59.8
Whatisyouroverallsa7sfac7onwiththeservicesthatyourHealthPlanprovidesforyourchild?
%
0to5 6.5
6to8 24.7
9 12.6
10 56.2
Goal 2: Medical Home
MedicalHome-amedicalhomecanbeaphysician'soffice,ahospitaloutpa7entclinic,acommunityhealthcenterorschool-basedclinic,aslongasitprovidestheservicesthatcons7tutecomprehensivecare–con7nuousaccesstomedicalcare;referraltopediatricmedicalsubspecial7esandsurgicalspecialists;andinterac7onwithchildcare,earlychildhoodeduca7onprogramsandschoolstoensurethatthespecialneedsofthechildandfamilyareaddressed(AmericanAcademyofPediatrics)
hgps://mchb.hrsa.gov/research/strategic_defini7ons.asp
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 39
Medical Home: What We Heard • InconsistentMedicalHomesforCYSHCN
• SpecialtycarecenterscanbeMedicalHomesinsomecases
• Fundinglimita7onspreventMedicalHomecapacityofsomeproviders
• LocalCCSAdministratorsknowmanydoctorsaretrying,butnotalwayssuccessful
• MedicalHomecapacityvariesbygeography
• EMR&EHRarenotalwaysbuilttoaccommodatetheMedicalHomeconcept
AccessIssues
• Lackofpaneledprimarycareprovidersandspecialistsinruralareas
• LongdrivestoSpecialCareCentersforthoseinruralareas
• Somefamiliesexperienceagreatdealoftroubleanddelaysingepngappointmentswithspecialists
• Lackofpaneledmentalhealthproviders
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 40
Medical Home: What We Heard DurableMedicalEquipment
• DelaysingepngDMEandsomeequipmentunavailablebecausecosttovendorlessthanreimbursement
• LackofDMEor7melyDMEleadingtohospitalscoveringcostssochildcanbedischargedordelaysindischarge
• Vendorshaveahard7megepngreimbursedthroughCCS=delays&fewerwillingvendorsasaresult
Communica;onbetweenProviders
• Needforbegercommunica7onbetweenprimaryandspecialtycareprovidersandotherswhoservechild
Workforce/CapacityIssues
• Manybarrierstophysicianpar7cipa7oninCCS–delaysinpayments,complexpaperwork,challengesdealingwithMedi-CalManagedcareplans
• Reduc7onsofstaffatthestateleveltoadministerCCSandprovideleadership,enforcestandards,panelphysicians
• Budgetcutsandlossoftrainedstaffatthelocallevel
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 41
Medical Home: What We Heard
• “Difficul7eswithMedicalHomeisthatsomepediatriciansarereallyafraidofourpa7ents—ifourpa7entsareimmunosuppressedthatscaresclinicpediatriciansinthearea.Wedon’thavealistoftheonesthatwilltakethemanddowell,andwedon’tknowwhichoneswillworkwithourpa7ents,andwealsodon’tknowwhatinsurancethegoodonestake.Pa7entsinthefartherflungcommuni7eshaveaharder7me…”–ProviderSurvey
• “Ithinktheanswervarieswiththegeographicregionyouaretalkingabout.Weareaverypediatrician-richcommunitybecauseofthehospitalsthatwehave—havefedpediatriciansintothecommunitythathavestayed.Wearepregyluckyinthatthepediatriciansinourcommunityarepregygoodatprovidingcarecoordina7on,becauseourkidsarelow-incomeandthepayisn’tverygood,andtheprivateMDscan’ttaketoomanykidswithMedi-CalsoFQHCscoverthegapsbecausetheyarenotscaredofthelowreimbursementrate.”–AdministratorSurvey
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 42
Medical Home: Na/onal Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH)
43.2% 42.2%
56.8% 57.8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
US California
%ofCSHCN,ages0through17,whohaveamedicalhomethatmeetsthemedicalhome
criteria(2016+2017)
CareMEETSmedicalhomecriteria CaredoesNOTmeetmedicalhomecriteria
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 43
Medical Home: Provider Survey*
What would your prac/ce need to become a medical home for CCS clients? % Addi7onalresources(e.g.financialreimbursements,morestaff) 46.9 Nothing,IhaveeverythingIneedtobeamedicalhomeforCCSclients 9.9 Nothing,thereareotherreasonsformynotprovidingamedicalhomeforCCSclients 6.2 Don'tknow/Notsure 29.6
• 48.8% Consider their practice to be a medical home for CYSHCN based on AAP definition of medical home
• 28.0% Do not • 23.2% Don't know/not sure
AreyoucurrentlypartofaHealthPlanthatissuppor7ngyourprac7cetobecomeamedicalhome?
• 21.3%Yes • 32.0% No• 46.7% Notsure/Don’tknow
*Note: For medical home questions, survey results include only physicians and nurses
Ra7ngofimportanceofthefollowingresourcesthatcouldenableyourprac7cetobeaprimarymedicalhomeforCCSclients
5-VeryImportant
Electronicmedicalrecordsystemthatlinksprimarycarewithpediatricsubspecialtyproviders 57.8%
Abilitytomakeinformalconsultsandcontactswithsubspecialtyproviders(email,phoneconsulta7on,and/ortelemedicine) 56.3%
Reimbursementforlongerofficevisits 61.9%
Supportstaffforcasemanagement/carecoordina7on 70.3%
Adequatereimbursementforcarecoordina7onandcasemanagementservices 64.1%
Readilyavailabletreatmentguidelinesforpa7entswithspecificdiagnoses/condi7ons(e.g.,neurofibromatosis,seizuredisorders) 40.6% Readilyavailablecommunitylevelresources(e.g.,RegionalCenter,FamilyVoices)formypa7entsandtheirfamiliestomeettheirsocial,psychosocial,andhomehealthneeds 50.8%
Availabilityofsubspecialtypediatricprovidersinmynetwork 66.7%
Directmechanismforcommunica7onandinterac7ngwiththechild’sschool 31.3%
Medical Home: Provider Survey
Accessing Health Care: Family Survey
IsthereaplacethatthischildUSUALLYgoeswhentheyaresickandyouoranothercaregiverneedsadviceabouthisorher
health?
%
Yes 66.9No 18.8Donotknow 5.5Missing 8.9
Duringthepast12months,howmany7mesdidyourchildseeadoctor,nurse,orotherhealthcareprofessionalforsick-childcare,
well-childcheck-ups,physicalexams,hospitaliza7onsorotherkind(s)ofmedical
care?
%
0 2.9 1 9.1 2-3 32.6 5-7 17.2 8+ 28.5 Missing 9.7
Duringthepast12months,howmany7mesdidyourchildvisitahospital
emergencyroom?
%
0 49.2 1 19.1 2 9.7 3 5.3 4+ 7.0 Missing 9.8
Diagnoses Diagnoses TotalMildMod Sev
Agen7ondeficitdisorderoragen7ondeficithyperac7vedisorder(ADDorADHD)
10.235.0 43.421.7
Allergies 25.246.8 36.916.3
Anxietyproblems 15.039.3 43.217.4
Arthri7sorjointproblems 11.127.5 45.327.1
Asthma 15.051.2 34.314.5
Au7sm,Asperger’sdisorder,pervasivedevelopmentaldisorder(PDD),orau7smspectrumdisorder(ASD)
8.335.3 32.132.6
Behavioralorconductproblems 13.133.0 45.421.6
Blindnessorimpairedvision 23.141.7 34.723.6
Bloodproblemsotherthanhemophiliaorsicklecellanemia
4.239.4 25.535.1
Brokenbones 6.946.1 27.926.0
Cancer,tumors 5.327.4 30.841.9
Cerebralpalsy 18.831.3 38.730.0
Hasadoctororotherhealthcareproviderevertoldyouthatyourchildhadorhasanyofthecondi7onsinthelistbelow?Ifyes,doesthechildcurrentlyhavethecondi7on,andis/wasthatcondi7onmild,moderate,orsevere?(checkallthatapply)
NumberofCondi7ons
%Any
1 31.72 17.33 11.94 9.55 7.66-7 10.58+ 11.7
Diagnoses (cont.)
Diagnoses Total MildMod Sev
Clezlip/clezpalate 3.638.838.822.5
Congenitalheartdisease 9.839.630.430.0
Cys7cfibrosis 1.144.028.028.0
Diabetes 8.221.548.629.8
Depression 7.349.137.313.7
Dentalproblems 15.342.240.717.1
Developmentaldelay 29.531.932.136.0
Downsyndrome 2.634.529.336.2
Epilepsyorseizuredisorder 13.933.436.430.2Gene7cdisorder 11.819.130.550.4Headinjury,concussion,ortrauma7cbraininjury
7.527.131.941.0
Hearingloss 16.425.142.432.5Heartproblems 13.243.231.225.7Hemophilia 0.855.616.727.8HIVorAIDS 0.475.012.512.5Infec7ousdisease 1.747.428.923.7
Hasadoctororotherhealthcareproviderevertoldyouthatyourchildhadorhasanyofthecondi7onsinthelistbelow?Ifyes,doesthechildcurrentlyhavethecondi7on,andis/wasthatcondi7onmild,moderate,orsevere?(checkallthatapply)
Diagnoses (cont.)
Diagnoses Total Mild Mod Sev
Intellectualdisability 17.4 28.2 31.840.1
Intes7nalorgastrointes7nalproblem 17.3 27.3 44.528.1
Kidneydiseaseorotherkidneyproblems
7.4 29.7 41.828.5
Liverproblems 2.3 40.0 36.024.0
Lungdisease 5.7 29.1 37.833.1
Mentalhealthproblem(Otherthandepression)
5.0 31.3 39.329.5
Migraineorfrequentheadaches 9.1 43.1 40.116.8
Musculardystrophy 3.0 20.9 31.347.8
Sicklecellanemia(traitordisease) 0.9 40.0 25.035.0
Spinalbifida 2.8 24.6 34.441.0
Spinalcordinjury 1.6 41.7 22.236.1
Hasadoctororotherhealthcareproviderevertoldyouthatyourchildhadorhasanyofthecondi7onsinthelistbelow?Ifyes,doesthechildcurrentlyhavethecondi7on,andis/wasthatcondi7onmild,moderate,orsevere?(checkallthatapply)
Access to Specialty Care: Family Survey
Specialistsaredoctorslikesurgeons,heartdoctors,allergydoctors,skin
doctors,andotherdoctorswhofocusononeareaofhealthcare.Howmany
differentspecialistdoctorshasyourchildseeninthelast12months?
%
0 10.91 35.92 26.53 15.54+ 11.2
Howmany7mesdidyourchildseeaspecialist(s)inthelastyear?
%
0 7.61 18.92 20.23 12.34 10.65+ 30.4
Inthelast12months,howozenwasyourchildabletoseeaspecialistwhenneeded?
%
Always 74.2 Usually 19.2 Some7mes 5.5 Never 1.1
Inthelast12months,howozenwasyourchildabletoseeaspecialistina
quickand7melymanner?
%
Always 59.8 Usually 26.2 Some7mes 11.2 Never 2.8
Access to Specialty Care: Family Survey
• Whattype(s)ofspecialist(s)wereyouNOTabletoseeinaquickand7melymannertable
• 19.2%offamiliesreportnotbeingabletoseeatleastonetypeofspecialistinaquickand7melymanner
Specialist % Allergy/Immunology 4.6 Cardiology 9.3 Dermatology 5.5 DevelopmentalMedicine 5.0 Endocrinology 9.5 Gastroenterology 14.8 GeneralSurgery 3.0 Gene7cs 7.5 Gynecology 1.1 Hematology 2.4 Nephrology 3.5 Neurology 23.0 Neurosurgery 10.5 NewbornMedicine 1.2 Nutri7on 4.0 Ophthalmology 16.3 Otolaryngology 10.5 Plas7cSurgery 2.4 Psychiatry 5.0 Pulmonology 8.4 Rheumatology 1.4 SportsMed/Orthopedics 10.4 Urology 4.7
Access Issues: Data from the California Specialty Care Collabora/ve (CSCC)
Averagepa7entwait7meforthefollowingspecial7esthatexceeded15businessdaysforthe3rdnextavailableini7alappointment
Specialty DaysOrthopedics 16Hematology/Oncology 16Infec7ousDisease 16Gastroenterology 20Urology 22Endocrinology 23Plas7cSurgery 23Otolaryngology 25Rehabilita7onMedicine
26
Psychiatry 31Pulmonary 31Pallia7veCare 30Rheumatology 32PainServices 33Nephrology 44Neurology 41Ophthalmology 45Metabolic 54MedicalGene7cs 73
Subspecialty MonthsGeneralSurgery 14MedicalGene7cs 14Allergy 14Behavioral/Developmental 14Otolaryngology 15Rehabilita7on 15Pallia7veCare 16PulmonaryMedicine 18Neurology 18OrthopedicSurgery 21Metabolic 23Ophthamology 22CardiothoracicSurgery 24Dermatology 24
Average length of time CSCC members have been recruiting for certain subspecialties that exceed one year
Service Needs and Care Received Duringthepast12monthswasthereany7mewhenyourchildneededthefollowingservices:
%Receivedcare(%)
Total AllSome None
Communica7onaidsordevices 5.1 80.6 8.6 10.8
Dentalcheckup/teethcleaning 19.3 88.0 7.6 4.4
Durablemedicalequipment 13.3 85.9 7.7 6.4
Eyeglassesorvisioncare 13.8 87.0 8.5 4.5
Hearingaidsorhearingcare 4.8 83.3 9.8 6.8
Homehealthcare 5.4 82.4 8.1 9.5
Hospitaliza7on(in-pa7entstay) 10.5 90.6 6.6 2.8
Mental/behavioralhealthcare 6.2 84.1 7.6 8.2
Medica7ons 19.3 89.0 7.2 3.8
Otherdentalcare 3.7 77.5 9.8 12.7
Painmanagement 14.2 86.1 9.5 4.4
Physical/occupa7onaltherapy 11.3 33.4 36.4 30.2
Specialtycare 12.6 87.8 9.0 3.2
Speechtherapy 10.1 85.8 9.8 4.4 Substanceabusetreatment/counsel
0.1 50.0 0.0 50.0
Well-childcheck-up 18.3 90.6 7.0 2.4
X-rays 12.6 91.0 6.4 2.6
AnyServicesNeeded
%
1 16.7
2 15.8
3 14.7
4 14.1
5-6 19.4
7+ 19.4
Access to Care: Challenges in Rural Coun/es • “Difficultyaccessinglocalservices-withtheruralnatureofourcounty,ourchildrenandfamiliesmusttravelanywherefrom4-6hourstoaccessspecialtymedicalservices.Becauseofthis,ouragendancetoappointmentsisdifficultanditcanbehardtomaintainserviceswithoutregularappointments.Ourfamiliesknowtheimportanceofagendingregularappointments,butsimplycannotmakethemduetodistance,weather,inabilitytotake7meoffwork,andhavingmul7pleotherchildrenwithsomealsohavingspecialmedicalneeds”–CCSAdministrators’Survey
• Providers,CCSAdministrators,andMedi-CalManagedCareHealthplansallrecognizedgeographyasabarrieringecngaccesstocare.Duringafocusgroupques7onaboutDME,oneproviderstated:
“…wedopickupalotofkidsthathavechronicinfec7onsinremotecoun7es,wedon’tsend[those]kidshomesome7mesbecausetheywon’tbeabletogetwhattheyneedoutthere—wecan’tfindanyoneouttherethatcandothedressingchangesorgethome
care.”
Access to Care: Administra/ve Issues
FromCCSAdministratorsSurvey:
• Vastinequalitybetweenindependentanddependentcoun7esinregardto7melinessofauthoriza7onsandopeningcases
• Improvedprocessing7meneededforcasesrequiringISCDreview
• “Begercommunica7onfromISCDregardingeligibility,annualrenewals,andeligibilityfornewreferrals.Wearenotreceivingreturnedemails.”
• “Expiringannualrenewalswithoutacontactpersontotalkto.Wehavehadthreerecentlythatexpiredwithoutcontactfromthestatethoughwesubmigeddocumentsthreemonthsaheadof7me.”
Access to Care: Workforce Issues
• “ThecurrentsupplyofpediatricsubspecialistsisinadequatetomeetthecurrentandfuturehealthneedsofchildreninCalifornia”–CaliforniaSpecialtyCareCoali7on
• 70%ofProvidersagreethattheMedi-Calprovidernetworkpresentschallengesintermsoftheavailabilityandcapacityofprimaryandspecialtycareproviders-ProviderSurvey
• Ofthe44respondentstotheCCSAdministratorssurvey,100%statedthattherearechallengesintheirprogram’scapacitytoperform,including:
◦ Difficultyhiringandretainingstaff(physicalandoccupa7onaltherapists,nursecasemanagers,publichealthnurses,clericalstaff)
◦ StatecapacitytoapproveSARsina7melyfashionfordependentcoun7es
◦ Uncertaintyifalloca7ontoCountyCCSprogramsforWCMcoun7eswillbeadequatetocoverminimumstaffingstandards
◦ Unan7cipatedandunfundedworkloadinWCMCountyCCSprograms
Access to Care: Workforce Issues (cont.)
“Thereisunan7cipated/unfundedworkloadremainingatthecoun7esthatwasnotplannedaspartofWCM,suchasAMRs[annualmedicalreviews]takingmuchlongerthantheState-allocated12minutes,sincetheHealthPlansarenotabletoprovidemedicalrecordsneededforAMR.Coun7esarealsochasingtheMedi-CalchurnasclientsfallonandoffofMedi-Cal.Inter-countyTransfersaresignificantlymorecomplex,withdifficultyobtainingrecordsfromtheHealthPlan.Complexi7esofstraddlingcommunica7onwiththeHealthPlans,useofSFTPforconstantPHIdatatransfer,weekly,monthly,quarterlymee7ngswiththeHealthPlanstotroubleshootandproblemsolveimplementa7onandtransi7onissues.”Impactsofaccessissues• 81%ofProvidersagreethatincreasingaccesstospecialtycare(81%)andprimarycare(73.3%)forchildrenwithCCScondi7onswillhelpdecreaseERvisitsandhospitaliza7on
Barriers to providing high quality care to CCS clients (0 = Not a barrier, 5 = significant barrier): Provider Survey
StatecapacitytoconductfacilityassessmentsLackofelectronicrecords
Other,ratehereanddescribebelowStatecapacitytoenforceCCSregula7ons
DelayinpaymentsforservicesprovidedtoCCSStatecapacitytopromptlyprocessapplica7onsforCCSreimbursementratesforcareofCCS-covered
Primarycarephysician’sabilitytoaccesselectronicDelayinauthoriza7onsfromCCS
HealthPlanrequirementstouseoutsidelabs/Amountanddifficultyofpaperworktocomplete
Medi-CalreimbursementratesforcareofDelayinauthoriza7onsfromPrivateHealthPlansAmountanddifficultyofpaperworktocompleteDelayinauthoriza7onsfromMedi-CalManaged
Communica7onchallengeswithsharingComplexityofcareandamountof7meneededto
WorkingwithMedi-CalManagedCareHealthAmountofresourcesneededtocoordinate
Transporta7onissues,e.g.,familiesgepngtoAmountofaccessibleandavailableresources(e.g.
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Communica/on between Providers: What We Heard
• “Ithinkweneedmuchbegercommunica7on—reallygreatifthekidisinclinic—notincliniccommunica7onisspogy.We’vehadissueswherepulmonologyisconcernedaboutscoliosisbutnottalkingtotheorthodocandthekidisscheduledforsurgeryandthepulmodocisn’tsigningoffonit.Thereareotherexampleswherewedon’tknowhowtointervene.Communica7onneedstobeimproved”–ProviderFocusGroup
FamilyFocusGroups:◦ Familiesfeelthatprovidersarelimitedintheirabilitytocommunicatewitheachotherandthisleavesparentsasthego-between.
◦ Themeofparentsbeingafraidtoshareinfowithproviders(e.g.,gepngprivatetherapyservices)sinceservicesmaybetakenaway
Communica/on with Others Serving CCS Popula/on: Provider Survey
35.5%
53.7%
22.7%
23.1%
50.9%
10.1%
10.5%
40.8%
39.4%
44.8%
52.1%
21.0%
32.5%
31.6%
17.8%
4.6%
20.4%
16.0%
13.8%
30.8%
34.5%
1.8%
1.1%
8.7%
6.5%
7.2%
22.5%
16.4%
4.1%
1.1%
3.5%
2.4%
7.2%
4.1%
7.0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
PrimaryCareProviders
OtherSpecialtyCareProviders,includingSpecialCareCenters
RegionalCenters
Schools
CCSMedicalTherapyProgram(MTP)
MentalHealthProviders
Community-BasedOrganiza7ons
RegularlyCommunicate Some7mesCommunicateBasedonNeedsRarelyCommunicate NeverCommunicateDon’tKnow/NotSure
Barriers to Provider Communica/on: Provider Survey
27.6%
21.8%
13.9%
30.9%
24.1%
18.5%
31.6%
41.2%
49.1%
5.9%
6.5%
13.9%
4.0%
6.5%
4.6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
TimeConstraints
LackofSharedElectronicMedicalRecords(EMR)
HealthInsurancePortabilityandAccountabilityAct(HIPAA)Concerns
[ConsentForms]
Don'tKnow/NotSure Never Some7mes Usually Always
Access to Mental and Behavioral Health Care: Provider Survey
8.4%
10.0%
8.6%
18.2%
15.0%
13.0%
18.9%
16.4%
18.0%
45.5%
29.3%
33.1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
CCSchildrenhaveadequateaccesstomentalandbehavioralhealthcare.
Non-CCSCYSHCNwithprivateinsurancehaveadequateaccesstomentaland
behavioralhealthcare.
CYSHCNwithMedi-CalManagedCareHealthPlanshaveadequateaccesstomentalandbehavioralhealthcare.
StronglyDisagree SomewhatDisagree SomewhatAgree StronglyAgree
51.1%
45.7%
64%
Mental Health and Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) Screening: Provider Survey
11.6%
15.9%
11.6%
15.9%
33.3%
39.1%
23.2%
29.0%
23.2%
23.2%
31.9%
29.0%
13.0%
5.8%
13.0%
8.7%
18.8%
15.9%
20.3%
17.4%
0% 10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Useascreeningtooltoiden7fyneedsrelatedtotheSDOHforyourCCSpa7ents?
Useascreeningtooltoiden7fyneedsrelatedtomentalandbehavioralhealthfor
yourCCSpa7ents?
Useascreeningtooltoiden7fyneedsrelatedtoSDOHforyournon-CCSCYSHCN
pa7ents?
Useascreeningtooltoiden7fyneedsrelatedtomentalandbehavioralhealthfor
yournon-CCSCYSHCNpa7ents?
Always Usually Some7mes Never Don'tKnow/NotSure
*Note:Surveyresultsonlyincludenursesandphysicians
Reasons for Not Screening for Mental Health or SDOH
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 64
28.8%
11.9%
30.5%
32.2%
10.2%
15.3%
18.6%
20.3%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Notapplicable-CYSHCNarerou7nelyscreenedformentalandbehavioralhealth
Notawareofreferralsourcestobeabletoaddresstheseneeds
Notenough7metodoscreening
Notenoughstafftodoscreening
Noreimbursement
Notfamiliarwithscreeningtools
ScreeningtoolnotbuiltintoEMR
Notmyrole/job
*Note:Surveyresultsonlyincludenursesandphysicians
Access to DME and Medical Supplies: What We Heard
• “Someoftheratesaregoodandsomearebad,can’tgetavendortopayforcertainthingsunlesswepairthemalltogether.Forexample,ahelmetishardtogetfromavendorunlessthechildisgepngawheelchair,andawalker,thenthey’llthrowthehelmetin—theydon’twanttodoallthatpaperworkforjustahelmet.”–Providerfocusgroup
• “ThereareanincreasingnumberofDMEitemsthatwecannolongerobtainduetothefactthattheMedi-Calreimbursementfortheitemislessthanthevendorscost.AlsoaproblemisthefactthatlargecompaniesarebuyingoutthesmallerDMEcompanies.TheselargercompanieshaveincreasedtheturnaroundforobtainingDMEdrama7cally.Thisisagreatfrustra7onforstaffandCCSMTUfamilies.”-Providerfocusgroup
• “Mostoftheprogramsseemtobeworkingwell.TheguidelinesareconstantlychangingforCCS,andtheydon’tinformyou.Iwenttocollege,butevenformeitisconfusing.ThebiggestissuethatIhadisthatalotofthetreatmentsarenotconsistent—therewasaperiodof7mewhenmydaughterdidnotgetanytherapy(5yearsold,cerebralpalsy)andIwasgivenalloftheexcusesinthebook.Onethingisthattheyonlyallowyoutogetonenecessarymedicalequipmentandthenareonlygrantedonewhenthechildisac7velyabletouseit,forexampleagaittrainer.IhadtogettheregionalcenterinvolvedaskingformedicalequipmentthatCCSwouldnotgrantus(alightgatetrainer).Intherapy—theygiveherallkindsofequipmenttouseandthentheytelltheparentstoduplicateitathome,butCCSwon’tgivethemmorethanonepieceofequipment—howareparentssupposedtoduplicatetherapyathomesothatshedoesn’tlosewhatshehasgained.Singlemother,hasnobodyelsetohelp.Otherchildrenw/privateinsurancearesurpassingmydaughterandwelostayearbecauseofCCS.Alotofthe“prescrip7ons”theygranthavetobesignedoffbyanMDandtherearealwaysdelaysduetothis.Longwaitbetweenprescrip7onandadministra7on,MDssome7mesdon’treturnauthoriza7onsdon’tcarryover,havetogobacktothenewMDforanewauthoriza7on.”
Access to DME and Medical Supplies: What We Heard
ACCESS to DME- How ogen issues related to DME present problems for your pa/ents: Provider Survey
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
ToofewDMEproviderswillingtoworkwithMedi-Calduetolowreimbursementrates
ToofewDMEproviderswillingtoworkwithMedi-Calduetodelaysinpayment
DMEprovidersrefusingtoprovidecertainkindsofequipmentduetolowreimbursementratesforthat
ClientdischargesbeingdelayedduetoissuesinobtainingDME
HospitalsorfamilieshavingtopurchaseDMEsothatclientscanbedischargedina7melymanner
Clientsmissingschool/parentsmissingworkduetodelaysingepngorrepairingneededDME
DMEprovidersrefusingtorepairormaintainequipmentthattheywerenotauthorizedtoprovide
Don'tKnow/NotSure NeveraProblem RarelyaProblemOccasionallyaProblem FrequentlyaProblem
70%
63.9%
45.8%
59.9%
71.8%
Medical Home Administra7veProcessingTimes
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 68Source: CMSNet 2014 & 2018
2DaysorLess 3daysto1wkWithin1week
Within2weeks
Referralun7lfirstSARauth.
2014 8.6%(4071) 30%(13999) 39% 65%
2018 5.9%(15406) 11.7%(30492) 17.6% 28.8%
SARrequesttofirstauth.
2014 40.2%(185816) 25%(117038) 65% 79%
2018 16.9%(18889) 17.6%(19590) 34.5% 51.5%
HHASARtoAuth.2014 40.6%(1205) 33%(983) 74% 86%
2018 25.1%(1198) 29.3%(1397) 54.4% 68.5%
WheelchairSARtoauth.
2014 37.6%(1074) 21%(604) 58% 73%
2018 25.9%(970) 18.9%(604) 44.8% 58.7%
MCHB Outcome #3: Insurance Coverage
FamiliesofCSHCNhaveadequateprivateand/orpublicinsurancetopayfortheservicestheyneed.
69
Adequacy of Insurance: NSCH 2016/17
26.6%
36.0%
73.4%
64.0%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
CA
US
InsuranceISadequateforchild'shealthneeds(CSHCN)
InsuranceisNOTadequateforchild'shealthneeds
Insurance Coverage: Administrator Survey
• “CreateanaidcodethatpendstheMedi-CalforCCSeligibleclientsratherthandroppingtheMedi-Califpendedsothatfolksdonotexperiencealapseincare”
• “StoptheCHURN[childrenfallingonandoffMedi-CalandCCS].Thisleadstopoorcasemanagementandfragmentedservices”
• “ImprovetheMedi-CalChurn,considerextendingtheCCSeligibilityto6months,notmonthly”
• “Require[Medi-CalManagedCarePlan]tokeeptheirchildrenfor30-60dayswhentheyfalloffof[Medi-CalManagedCarePlan]buts7llhavefeeforserviceMedi-Cal.”
• “Difficultywiththemanagedcarecoveringhealthcareneedswhilewai7ngforCCSeligibility”
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 71
Insurance Coverage: Family Survey
Childcoveredbyanyofthefollowingtypesofinsurance(check
allthatapply) %
Medi-Cal 90.9
Private 13.5
Donotknow 0.2
Uninsured 0.1
Doesyourchild’shealthinsuranceallowyourchildtoseethehealthcareproviders
thatyourchildneeds? % Always 74.5 Usually 18.6 Some7mes 4.2 Never 0.6 Notapplicable 1.2 Missing 0.7
Insurance Coverage: Family Survey
• Duringthelast12months,didyourchildneedanyservicesthattheirinsurancedidnotcover?Pleasecheckallthatapply:◦ 17.8%(609)checkedatleastoneservice
Service %
Communica7onaidsordevices 7.2
Dentalcheckup/teethcleaning 14.3
Durablemedicalequipment 20.0
Eyeglassesorvisioncare 17.9
Hearingaidsorhearingcare 5.4
Homehealthcare 3.6
Hospitaliza7on(in-pa7entstay) 4.1
Mental/behavioralhealthcare 5.1
Medica7ons 26.8
Otherdentalcare 12.3
Painmanagement 2.0
Physical/occupa7onaltherapy 11.7
Specialtycare 8.7
Speechtherapy 10.8
Substanceabusetreatment/counsel 0.2
Well-childcheck-up 4.6
X-rays 2.6
MCHB Outcome #4: Screening and Prevalence
Childrenarescreenedearlyandcon7nuouslyforspecialhealthcareneeds
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 74
High-Risk Infant Follow-Up Program (HRIF)
California’sHighRiskInfantFollow-up(HRIF)Program,runbyCCS,overseesoutpa7entfollow-upofinfantsrequiringaddi7onaldevelopmentalcareazerdischargefromtheNICUthroughlocalHRIFclinics.
HRIFclinicsprovidefollow-upcaretoallinfantsbornbefore32weeksofgesta7on,orwithabirthweightlessthanorequalto1500grams,aswellinfantswitharangeofneurologicand/orcardiovascularriskfactors.
◦ Infantswhohavespent7meintheNICUareozenathigherriskforbehavioral,neurological,developmental,orgrowthchallengeslaterinchildhood.
◦ HRIFclinicsensurethattheseinfantsgrowasexpectedazerdischargeandmeetdevelopmentalmilestones.
◦ HRIFclinicsprovidethreeormoreassessmentvisitswithCCS-paneledproviderswhofollowtheinfantoverthefirstthreeyearsoflifeandiden7fyexis7ngandnewissuesastheyarise.
HRIFisrelatedtheMCHBGoalofEarly&Con;nuousScreeningbecauseitismeanttoprovideearlyscreeninganddetec7onofaspecialhealthcareneedtoahighriskpopula7on.
HRIF: Data on Loss to Follow-Up • Tanget.al.(2018)surveyedhigh-riskinfantfollow-upprogramsinCalifornia,56(82%)respondedtothesurvey◦ Thefirstvisitno-showratebetween10and30%wases7matedby44%ofprogramswithhigherno-showratesforsubsequentvisits.
◦ Commonstrategiestoremindfamiliesofappointmentswerephonecallsandmailings.
◦ Mostprograms(54%)didnothaveastrategytohelpfamilieswholiveddistanttothehigh-riskinfantfollow-upclinic.
• Hintzet.al(2019)didastudytodeterminehowtopreventLosstoFollow-Up(LTFU),whichcanbedetrimentaltofamiliesandchildren,especiallyverylowbirthweight(VLBW)infants.Theyhavedeterminedthat:◦ Outofthe80%ofVLBWinfantsreferredtoHRIFin2010-2011,74%hadatleast1HIRFvisitw/in12months
◦ Iden7fiedreasonsforlosstofollow-upincluded:Parentrefused(6%),familymoved(5%),insuranceauthoriza7ondenied(3%),unabletocontact(14%),otherhighriskfollow-up(3%),otherreason(8%)
◦ BUTthemajority(48%)ofthereasonsforLTFUwereunknown
HRIF: Data on Loss to Follow-Up (cont.)
Hintzetal.(2019)alsofound:◦ Higherodds(morelikelytoagend)forfirstHRIFvisitagendancewasassociatedwith:◦ oldermaternalage◦ Lowerbirthweight◦ privateinsurance◦ historyofsevereintracranialhemorrhage◦ 2parentsasprimarycaregivers◦ HRIFprogramvolume◦ Lowerbirthrates
◦ Lowerodds(lesslikelytoagend)forfirstHRIFvisitagendancewasassociatedwith:◦ maternalraceAfricanAmericanorblack◦ greaterdistancetoHRIFprogram
HRIF: Needs and Ongoing Efforts
Needsbasedonresearchfindings:◦ Iden7fyfamilychallengesinaccessandresourceriskfactorsduringinfanthospitaliza7onintheNICU
◦ Providefamiliesenhancededuca7onaboutbenefitsofHRIF◦ CreatecomprehensiveNICU-to-hometransi7onapproaches
HRIFprogramisworkingto:◦ Begercharacterizefamily&caregiverbarrierstoHRIFvisits◦ Begerunderstandwhatprogram-levelresourcesareneededandwhattheprocesschallengesare
◦ Iden7fyopportuni7esforinterven7onandstrategiesthatneedtobetailoredtoHRIFprogramsandregionalneeds
Screening of Medi-Cal Children
• Preven7veservicesincludeEarlyCon7nuousorDevelopmentalScreening
• “Anannualaverageof2.4millionchildrenwhowereenrolledinMedi-caloverthepastfiveyearshavenotreceivedallofthepreven7vehealthservicesthattheStatehascommigedtothem.”-Source:CaliforniaStateAuditReport2019
• Between2013and2018,anaverageof2.4millionchildreneachyearenrolledinMedi-Caldidnotreceiveallrequiredpreven7veservices,accordingtothefindings-Source:CaliforniaStateAuditReport2019
Developmental Screening: NSCH
31.10%
22.20%
68.90%
77.80%
46.90%
29.70%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
US California
%ofchildren,ages9through35months,whoreceivedadevelopmentalscreeningusingaparent-completedscreening
toolinthepastyear(16;17)
Goal:Con7nuousScreening
ParentCompleted
ParentdidNOTcomplete
ParentofCSHCNcompleted
ParentofCSHCNNOTcompleted
Well-Child Visits ProviderSurvey:Over95%ofprovidersfeelthattheannualwell-childvisitforCYSCHNisveryimportant(N=66)AreCYSHCNreceivingwell-childvisits?(N=70)◦ Yes,mostappeartobehavingthese
visits 50.0%◦ Yes,butonlysomeappeartobe
havingthesevisits 24.2%◦ No,itappearsthatmostarenot
havingthesevisits 9.1%◦ Idon’tknowwhethertheyarehaving
thesevisits 16.7%
Whoisprovidingthesevisits:(open-ended)◦ AlmostallreportedPrimaryCare
Providers
Duringthepast12months,howmany7mesdidyourchildreceiveawell-child
check-up,whichisageneralcheck-up,whentheywere
NOTsickorinjured?
%
0 8.8 1 16.8 2 15.8 3+ 15.0 Missing 10.2
*Note – reporting data only for physicians and nurses
FamilySurvey:
MCHB Outcomes #5: Organiza/on of Services
Community-basedservicesforchildrenandyouthwithspecialhealthcareneedsareorganizedsofamiliescanusethemeasily.
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 82
MCHB Outcomes #5: Organiza/on of Services
15.7% 17.9%
84.3% 82.1%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Na7onwide California
Percentofchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds(CSHCN),ages0through17,whoreceivecareinawell-
func7oningsystem(2016/17)
Receivecareinawell-func7oningsystemDonotreceivecareinawell-func7oningsystem
CAranked36thcomparedtootherstates
Organiza/on of Services: What We Heard • “AbouthalfoftheCCSpa7entsareextremelysocioeconomicallychallengedwithparentsthatstruggleeitherwithfinances,language,orcomprehensionofthecondi7on.Simplethingssuchasgotolabandgetblooddrawn,makingappointments,followingmedica7oninstruc7onsarechallengingforthem.Manydonothavetransporta7ontocometoclinic.We'reluckythatourins7tu7onprovidescasemanagersthathelpsuswithpaperworkrelatedtocoverage,buttheycan'thelpthepostdischargeexecu7onbythefamilies.Havingsomeonefromthehealthplanthatknowsthecareplanandhelpthefamilyadheretoitwouldbeextremelyhelpful.Thepossibilityoftransportassistanceisalsoextremelyhelpful.”–CCSProviderSurvey
• “Weneedtoknowwhatservicesandmedica7onsarecoveredbyCCSclearlyandbycountyastheformulariesaredifferent.Weneedtoknowwhichdiabetessuppliesarecoveredandwhichbrandsarecovered.Weneedthisinforma7oneasilyaccessibletoprovidersandpharmacistssothecorrectmedica7oncanbeprovided.Familieshavedelaysingepngprescrip7onsorglucoseteststripsandourstaffspendssignificantamountsof7mesor7ngthisout.Coun7eschangewhattheywillcoverandanditseemsprovidersarethelasttoknow.WewouldappreciatealistfromeachcountysenttoprovidersorupontheCCSwebsitelis7ngwhatiscoveredandchangestocoverage.”–CCSProviderSurvey
Organiza/on of Services: What We Heard
• “My18yearoldgrandchild(Iamhisguardian/conservatorfor15+yearsandhavecaredforhimsincebirth)hasbeenreceivingCCSbenefitssincehewasaninfant.IhonestlycansayIdon'tknowwhatIwouldhavedonebackthenwithoutthem.HehasatwinwiththesamemusclediseaseandisalsoaCCSclient.Theirpar7culardiseaseisknownasoneofthemostunderdiagnoseddiseasesduetothecomplexityofsymptoms.Itisgene7cwitheachgenera7onpresen7ngmoresevereun7lfinallyababywiththemostsevereformisdiagnosed.WearesogratefultohaveourCCSmanagerwhounderstandsmygrandsons'needsandhelpsuskeepourteamofdoctorsthatcareforthem.Andnowwiththenewdxofleukemia,itisevenmoreimportantthaneverthatwekeepreceivingourauthoriza7onsina7melymanner.ItmeanssomuchtohaveaspecializedgroupatCCSthattrulyunderstandscomplexdiseasesandknowstheimportanceofkeepingontopofthekidsneeds.Wehaveneverhadadelayinacallbackorauthoriza7onever,andwhenyouhaveaseriouslyillchild,thatmeansalot.WearealsogratefultotheLucilePackardChildren’sHospitalandMedicaldoctorsthatacceptMedi-Cal/CCS.”–CCSFamilySurvey
Organiza/on of Services: What we heard
• “Mynursecasemanageralwaysreachesouttomeandtomywifewhatweneededtodo.Forexample,whotocall,andwhatstuffweneededsothatCCScanauthorizeservices.Mynursecasemanageralsokeptusupdatedofwhatisgoingonsoweknowwhattoexpect.”–CCSFamilySurvey
• “Alotofitisbegercommunica7on.Evensendingout,whatrightsareinCCS,understandingofhowprogramworks.Ididn'tevenknowhowmychildqualified.Itwasatrauma7c7mewhenIsignedthepaperworkandImust'vesigneditnotrealizing.I'msuresomeonetoldmebecauseIwascaughtupinlife.”–CCSFamilySurvey
Organiza/on of Services - WCM: What We Heard
• “OurHealthPlanalsosubcontractstransporta7on,pharmacy,andradiology,andthereisalotoffragmenta7onbecausethefamilyneedstocallthesedifferentcompaniesinordertoaccesstheservices.Wehearfromfamiliesthattheyneedtomakemul7plephonecalls—whereasinthepastwecouldmakesurethattheygetwhattheyneed.Notallfamiliesareequippedtodothis.”–CCSAdministratorFocusgroup
• “Theprovidersthatknewitbefore,knewaboutauthoriza7on.InMedi-CalManagedCareitisactuallyfragmentedandtheywantaseparateauthoriza7on—providersfeelliketheyhavetoaskforeverything.Whenwedoauthoriza7ons,theseauthoriza7onstendtoencompassthatdiagnosis—soitisabroaderauthoriza7onoffofaspecificdiagnosis.Now,withWholeChildModeltheyareaddingaddi7onalstepsandcomplica7ons.”-CCSAdministratorFocusgroup
• “Thereisnobodydoingoversight,we’veactuallybeentoldwhenweaskcasemanagementques7ons,wearetold‘well,that’snotyourbusiness.’Clientsdon’tknowwhotocallattheHealthPlan—theyhavetotelltheirstorytofourdifferentpeopleinfourdifferentdepartments.”-CCSAdministratorFocusgroup
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 87
Organiza/on of Services - WCM: What We Heard
• “Ineverhadaproblemwiththediapersbefore,theywouldcomeallofthe7meandon7meandthenwestartedtono7cethattheyweren’tshowingup.WhenJunecame,Icalledtofindoutandtheysaidthatsheneededtogetaprescrip7onfromthevendor.WhenIcalledthevendortheysaidthatduetothechangestheywerenotcontractedwith[healthplan],andthenIcalledCCSandtheysaidthatthevendorshouldbecontractedandexpectedmetocallandfigureoutwhotheyarecontractedwith.Thenfinally,Igotalistforthreeplacesin[countyname],andtheyallsaidwas“wedon’tknowwhytheykeepreferringyouhere,wedon’tofferthoseservices.”ThenIfinallycalledshieldandtheywereexplainingshedidn’tqualifyfordrugs.Ihadtogobacktotheoriginalvendortogetthelistofwhattheysentherinthepast,hadtogototheMDtogetanauthoriza7on.WhydoIhavetokeepaskingforsomethingthattheyknowmydaughterhasalife;meneedfor?”–CCS/CYSHCNFamilyFocusGroup
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 88
Organiza/on of Services -WCM: What We Heard
• “Itwasverygoodaboutthat[tellinguswhatcondi7onswereeligible],butitisn’tanymore.Thewholechildmodel—peoplearestrugglingbecausetheyareCCSeligible,butnotallowedtouseCCSfee-for-service.Halfofthemhaven’tevenreaditat[redactednameofhealthplan]andcannotinterpretit.Pregymuchdidn’ttellusanythingun7lithappened.ItisdifficultnowbecausewearereallyCCSclients,butwecan’tuseit.[Healthplan]iss7llfiguringouthowtofititintotheirsystem.”–CCS/CYSCHNFocusGroup
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 89
Health Plans: Family Survey
Doyouneedmoreinforma7onabout: %
CCS 26.1 Medi-Cal 23.5 PrivateInsurance 2.0 Donotknow 2.3 Mychildisnotinsured 0.1 Idonotneedmoreinforma7on 55.0
Doyouknowwhomtocalltogetanswersaboutyourchild’scareor
insurance(forexampleifservicesaredeniedandyouwanttoaskwhy)?
%
Yes 69.5 No 10.5 Notsure 9.2 Notapplicable 1.2 Missing 9.6
Doyouknowhowtofileagrievanceorcomplaintabout
yourchild’shealthcare?
%
Yes 41.9 No 30.3 Notsure 14.5 Notapplicable 3.2 Missing 10.0
IfyestoQ28,haveyoueverfiledacomplaint?
%
Yes 38.9 No 18.1 Notsure 10.0 Notapplicable 2.1 Missing 0.5
Interpreta/on Services: Family Survey
IsEnglishtheprimarylanguagespokeninyourhome? %
Yes 70.0No 29.5
Howozendoyouneedaninterpretertohelpyouspeakwithdoctorsandnurses? %
Always 39.8Usually 11.8Some7mes 18.3Never 8.7
Howozenareinterpreta7onservices
available?(forthosewhoalways,usuallyorsome7mesneedan
interpreter) %Always 69.1Usually 17.3Some7mes 11.3Never 0.8
Coordina/on of Services: Family Survey Howozenareyourchild’sservicescoordinatedinawaythatmakesthemeasytouse?
%
Always 53%Usually 29%Some7mes 14%Never 4%
Howozenisiteasytocoordinatetherapy(physicaltherapy,occupa7onaltherapy)foryourchildintheschoolsepng?
%
Always 49% Usually 21% Some7mes 10% Never 7% Donotknow 12%
Impact on Families: Family Survey
Howmanyhoursperweekdoyouorotherfamilymembersspendarrangingorcoordina7ngcare?
%
0to5 65.0 6to10 14.1 11to15 5.1 16to20 2.4 20+ 13.4
Howmanyhoursperweekdoyouorotherfamilymembersspendprovidingcareforyourchild’smedicalcondi7onathomeforyourchild?
%
0to10 50.8 10to20 10.4 20to30 6.8 30to40 4.1 40to50 3.6 50to60 2.2 60to70 2.1 70+ 20.0
Haveyouorotherfamilymembersevercutdownonhoursorhadtoleaveajobbecauseofyourchild’shealth?
%
Yes 54.0No 43.3Donotknow 2.6
Case Management/Care Planning: Family Survey Inaddi7ontoyourselfandyourfamily,whohelpstoarrangeorcoordinatecareforyourchild?(checkallthatapply)
%
NurseCaseManager 12.3 HealthPlan 8.6 RegionalCenter 15.3 SpecialCareClinic/Center 14.1 CountyCCSCaseManager 20.9 Childsschool 4.6 Nobodyhelps 34.5 DontKnow/NotSure 7.9
Duringthepast12months,haveyoufeltthatyoucouldhaveusedextrahelpgepng,sepnguporcoordina7ngyourchild’scareamongthedifferenthealthcareprovidersor
services?
%
Always 11.8 Usually 7.0 Some7mes 17.8 Never 43.1 Notapplicable 7.3 Missing 13.4
Hasahealthcareproviderorcasemanagerhelplinkedyouwithsupport(e.g.familysupportgroups,parent
mentors,onlinesupportgroups,etc.)?
%
Yes 32.8
No 30.5
Donotknow 26.1
Ifyoufeelthatmoresocialand/oremo7onalsupportwouldhelpyouoryourfamilycope,whatkindofsocialand/or
emo7onalsupportwouldyoulikeforyouoryourfamily?Pleasecheckallthatapply:
%
Onlineortelephonesupportgroup 18.2 Inpersonsupportgroup 22.8 Parentmentororparentpartner 11.2 NotApplicable–noaddi7onalsupportneeded
42.1
Family Need for other Services – Family survey
• 10.8%offamiliesneededatleastoneoftheservicesbelow.
Receivedcare(%)Always Usually Some Never
Respite Care 36.2 31.3 14.1 21.7 32.8Genetic Counseling 16.3 51.7 5.6 14.6 28.1Mental Health Care, Emotional Support or Counseling
37.5 37.6 12.7 24.9 24.9
Legal Issues 10.6 27.6 10.3 24.1 37.9Housing Issues 12.6 27.5 13.0 20.3 39.1Accessing Food Assistance and Other Government Benefits17.4 56.8 8.4 21.1 13.7Other 4.0 40.9 18.2 27.3 13.6
During the past 12 months was there any time when you or other family members
needed the following services and did not receive them?:
Ofthosewithanyneed,%
needingservice
Organiza/on of Services: CCS Standards and Enforcement
25.7%
5.51%
22.0%
29.2%
10.2%
21.0%
29.2%
10.2%
21.0%
7.6%
25.2%
13.3%
6.3%
33.9%
15.2%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Regularfacilitysitevisitsareanimportantpartofmonitoringandenforcingregula7ons/Numbered
Legers.
ThestateCCSprogramhasadequatecapacity(i.e.staff,clinicalexper7se,
funding)toconductperiodicfacilitysitevisitstomonitorandenforceregula7ons/NumberedLegers.
Facilitysitevisitsareconductedbyamul7disciplinaryteamofstatestaffandconsultantswhoareexpertsintheir
fields.
StronglyDisagree SomewhatDisagree Neutral SomewhatAgree StronglyAgree
Organiza/on of Services: Standards and Enforcement
CCSAdministratorSurvey:Comprehensivecarecoordina7onandoversightfromStateofcarecoordina7on[forWCMHealthPlans]FullydefineandimplementCaseManagementbytheHealthPlansDefine,create,andimplementstandardsforMedicalHomes.AllCCSclientstohaveanappropriatemedicalhome.FinalizetheInter-CountyTransferNumberedlegerImprovingthetransferprocessbetweencoun7es-crea7ngastandardprotocolforallcoun7estobeonthesamepageProvidePDN(privatedutynurse)PolicyorNumberedleger
Extending CCS Eligibility: Provider Survey
44.8%
14.5%
40.7%
Yes No Don’tKnow/NotSure
0%10%20%30%40%50%
Should eligibility for certain CCS conditions (e.g. hemophilia or
cystic fibrosis) be extended to 65 years old, at which time Medicare
would be available?
N = 145
WhichCCScondi7onsshouldbeextendedto65yearsold?(ProviderSurvey,open-ended,N=68)Themesandquotes:• Congenitallyacquiredcondi7onsthatarechronicandwilllastintoadulthood,e.g.,cerebralpalsy,musculardystrophy,spinabifida
• “Allcongenitaldiseases.Toodifficultfindingadultproviderswhoarefamiliarwithchildhoodcondi7ons.Adultprovidersdonothavetheinfrastructuretocoordinatecare”
• “Metabolic/gene7ccondi7onssuchasPKU,Fagyacidoxida7ondefects,ureacycledefect,etc...Therearenoadultphysicianstrainedinmetabolic/gene7cdisorders.”
Care Coordina/on: Survey Results
Whatdifferences,ifany,arethereinthecoordina7onofhealthcareforCCSversusnon-CCSCYSHCN?(ProviderSurvey,open-endedques7on)
Keythemesandquotes:
• CCSpa7entshavegreaterneedandcomplexityofmedical,therapy,financial,andmentalhealthissues.
• “Coordina7onofcareisbegerforCCSpa7ents,andsupportservicesfornon-CCSpa7entsareprovidedbymyteambutareNOTreimbursedbyanyone!Itbecomesessen7allyFREEcare(RN,SocWkr,e.g.),whichisnotsustainableforlargenumbersofpa7ents.”
• “CCSpa7entsrequireanextralayerofpaperworkandcoordina7onthatcommercialpa7entsdon'thave.”
• CCSCYSHCNreceivemorespecializedcasemanagement.
• “CCSprovidessomecarecoordina7oncentrallywhichishelpful.Fragmentedresponsibility(CCSandhealthplan)leadstoaddi7onalworkinseekingauthoriza7ons,denials,etc.”
Care Coordina/on: Provider survey
WhoPaysforcoordina7on?(N=125) %
CCS 29.6Medi-CalManagedCareHealthPlan 12.4Privateinsurance 7.1Philanthropy 2.9
Noonepaysforit,wejustdoitbecauseitisneeded 13.6Don’tknow/NotSure 30.2Other(pleasespecify) 4.1
Howimportantisitforyou(oryourprac7ce)toprovidecare
coordina7onforCYSHCN?(N=127)%
VeryImportant 70.1
Important 11.8
SomewhatImportant 3.2
NotImportant 3.9
Don'tKnow/NotSure 11.0
Telehealth Survey Results
Barrierstoprovidingtelehealth:(open-ended,N=95)Themesandquotes:• Reimbursementforstaffandresourcesneeded
• Lackofpa7entaccesstoneededtechnology
• Uptodateandsecure(HIPPACompliant)programs,portals,andelectronicdevices
• “Very7meconsumingwhenusinganinterpreter”
• “Youcan'tdoaphysicalexam”
*Note:Surveyresultsonlyincludenursesandphysicians
40.9%
23.9%
16.9%
18.3%
Yes,Idoprovidetelehealth
Yes,Iwouldbewillingto
No,Idon'tprovide
Don’tKnow/NotSure
0% 5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%
Do you currently provide telehealth services or would you be willing to provide telehealth services to CCS
clients?
Telehealth Survey Results
Whatstepsshouldbetakentoreducebarrierstoprovidingtelehealthservices?(open-ended,N=72)Themesandquotes:• Improvingreimbursement• Fundingforsecuretechnologyneededtoprovidetelehealth• “Elimina7ngtherequirementthatthetelehealthservicesbeprovidedatahealthcarecenter.Wouldn'titbegreattoconducttelehealthvisitsusingapa7ent'shome???”
• “Havingacityorcountybasedloca7onapa7entcouldgoforatelehealthvisitiftheydonothaveaccesstotheappropriateequipmentorreliableinternetconnec7on”
• “EncouragingALLfamiliestosignupforMyChartatthe7meofallnewappointmentsandatthenextavailableappointmentwhentheyhaven'tsignedupyet.”
• “Getuptodatephonenumbersateveryencounter”
Medi-Cal Provider Network: Provider Survey
34.3%
35.5%
12.1%
1.8%
4.8% 11.5%
TheMedi-Calprovidernetworkpresentschallengesintermsoftheavailabilityandcapacityofprimaryandspecialtycare
providers.
StronglyAgree SomewhatAgree Neutral
SomewhatDisagree StronglyDisagree Don’tKnow/NotSure
69.8%ofProvidersagree
MCHB Core Outcome #6: Transi/on to Adulthood
Youthwithspecialhealthcareneedsreceivetheservicesnecessarytomaketransi7onstoallaspectsofadultlife,includingadulthealthcare,work,andindependence.
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 104
Transi/on to Adulthood: What We Heard
ProviderFocusGroups:
• VeryhardtofindaprovidertoseeCCSclientsastheyageout,especiallywithMedi-Calinsurance
• Lackoftransi7onplanning• Lackofadultspecialistswithexper7seincondi7onsorigina7nginchildhood
FamilyFocusGroups:◦ Manyfamiliesinfocusgroupsdidnothavechildrenthatwereattheageoftransi7onyet;iftheywereabove14,mosthadn’tbeenspokentoaboutit,butmanywereconcernedwhatitwouldmeanfortheirCYSHCN
◦ Someparentsjusthandledthetransi7onthemselves,somewiththehelpofcountycasemanagers
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 105
Transi/on to Adulthood: What We Heard
• “TheotherissuethatwefacedisthatPCPsinthecommunitywereafraidtotakeoncomplexkidsasadults.”–CCSAdministratorsfocusgroup
• “Wearetryingtopartnerwithprovidersinoutlyingcoun7esthatmayonlyseeoneHIVtransi7onspecialhealthcareneedskid,andtheymayonlycallthemonceandiftheydon’tshowup,theysaythatis‘toobad’becausetheyareadultsandtheycantakecareofthemselves.We’vehadseveralpa7entsdieinthelasttenyearsbecauseofthis,becausetheyhavehad10-12regimensintheirlife7meandtheMDsdon’thavethecapacityorthesupportgroupstodealwiththe‘bornwithHIV’popula7on,theydon’tfitintothebehavioralhealthsupportgroupsforthis.”–CCSProviderFocusGroup
• “Forpediatricandadultworlditisdayandnight.Weno7cedwhentheytransi7onitishardtofindaproviderthatunderstandsthecomplexi7esoftheirdisease,wehavealotofkidsbouncingbackandaskingtobeseenbyusazertransi7on.Needasmoothertransi7on.”
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 106
Transi/on to Adulthood: What We Heard
FamilyFocusGroupParent:
“Forus,itwentsmooth.Wewerenotabletofindanadultproviderthough;IpickupwhereMedi-Calleavesoff.IfoundthePCPforher,thepediatriciangavethreerecommenda7onsandnoneofthemwouldtakeherbecauseofherneed.Theequipmentthattheygaveusazertransi7onwasgoodqualityenoughandwehaven’t
hadaneedforDME.ThiswasbeforeWholeChildModel,ourcasemanagermadesurethatwehadevery
bitofequipmentweneededwhensheagedout.”
Transi/on to Adulthood: What We Heard
Providerssuggested…• Pediatricproviders/specialistsseeCYSHCNintoadulthood
• Telehealth
• MorefamilyengagementfromCCS
• Morecollabora7on&partnershipbetweenpediatric&adultproviders
• Providersneedtostartdiscussingtransi7onatage14
• Outsidefundingforspecializedtransi7onprograms(whichsomehavealready)
“Wehavesicklecell[transi7on]bootcampswithdonatedmoney.Westartkidsat13.Theseexistalloverthecountry;Idon’tknowhowsuccessfultheyare.”
Transi/on to Adulthood: Family Survey
Havedoctorsorotherhealthcareproviderstalkedwithyourchildabouthowtheir
healthcareneedswillbemetwhenyourchildturns21?
%
Yes 36.7 No 48.5 Donotknow 11.5 Missing 3.2
Isyourchild14yearsorolder? %Yes 27.1 No 62.5 Missing 10.4
Ifyes,wereyouabletofindanadultdoctororprovider?
%
Yes 59.4No 12.1Donotknow 26.6Missing 1.9
Haveanyofthefollowingpeopleororganiza7onshelpedyourchildfindanadultmedical
provider?Checkallthatapply:
%
CCS 22.2 HealthPlan 13.8 OurPediatrician 13.5 Noneoftheabove 47.2
Strategies to improve Transi/on: Provider Survey
86.9%
86.1%
86.1%
7.6%
8.3%
10.4%
2.1%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.5%
4.9%
3.5%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
Amul7disciplinarytransi7onteamincludingaLicensedClinicalSocialWorker,Nurse,CaseManager,SpecialtyCareProvider,PrimaryCarePhysician,MedicalTherapy
Assistanceinfindinganewprimarycareprovider
Assistanceinfindinganewspecialtycareprovider
YouthwhohaveagedoutofCCSandhaveMedi-Calwouldbenefitfromhaving:
Don'tKnow/NotSure StronglyDisagree SomewhatDisagree
SomewhatAgree StronglyAgree
Poten/al Priori/es
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 111
Families are Partners: Poten/al Priori/es • Careneedstobemorepa7ent-centered,drivenbypa7entexperiences
• Increasestaffthatareresponsibleforcarecoordina7on• Increasecasemanagementstaff• Createprotocolsorregula7onsmanda7ngthatfamiliesareinvolvedindecisionmakingabouttheirchild
• Createmoreopportuni7esforfamiliestoreceivecommunica7onandeduca7onfromMedi-CalManagedCare
• CreatenewmaterialstoeducateandcommunicatetheCCSsystemtofamiliesinlanguagethatwillmakesensetothem,withinputfromfamiliesandCYSHCN
• IncreaseCCSsocialworkerstafftoaddressthesocialneedsoffamilies• Improvewebsitetobeeasierforfamiliestonavigate• Getridof“milestones”asameasureofachild’sdevelopment,itisn’tinclusiveofallDXs
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 112
Medical Home: Possible Priori/es • Increasesupport(funding)forprimarycareforCYSHCN,specificallyforMedicalHomeprograms
• DevelopMedicalHomecriteriaandstandardstopromoteclarityandunderstandingacrossorganiza7ons
• Provideaddi7onalprovidereduca7ononhowtoworkwithCYSHCN• IncreasenumberofCCSprovidersANDmentalhealthprovidersthatcanserveCYSHCNbyprovidingaddi7onalfundingandincen7ves(i.e.loanforgiveness)
• IntegratementalandbehavioralhealthprogramstoCCSservicesavailabletoCYSHCNANDtheirfamilies,iftheyalreadyexist,increasethemviafunding
• ClarifytheroleofMTUsbothfortradi7onalCCSandWholeChildModelcoun7es
• AllowWCMfamiliestos7llseeCCS-PaneledprovidersfromoutsideoftheHealthPlans
• EnsurethatfamiliesinWCMcoun7esarebeingreferredtoMTUs
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 113
Medical Home: Possible Priori/es (cont.) • DevelopprotocolstoensurethatfamiliesareabletoduplicatePTathome
• Re-evaluatetheprocessforDMEauthoriza7onsothatvendorsstopfavoringprivatelyinsuredindividuals
• Incorporateprotocolsorregula7onsthataddressthesocialdeterminantsofhealthandadversechildhoodexperienceintotheCCSprogram
• Returncasemanagementtothewaythatitwasundertradi7onalCCS(evenifHealthPlansareimplemen7ngit)
• Financiallyincen7vizeins7tu7onsandprac7cestohavesocialservices
• Developprotocolsorregula7onsforscreeningCYSHCNANDtheirfamiliesformentalandbehavioralhealthissues
• DetermineifWCMchildrenarereceivingthesamelevelofbenefitsastradi7onalCCSchildren,andifnot,findawaytoprovidethesamelevelofcare
Medical Home: Possible Priori/es (con.t)
• Developregula7onsfortelehealthsothatitcanstarttobemoreavailabletoCYSHCNandtheirfamilies
• Streamlineprocesssoproviderscanseeifmedica7onorsupplyiscoveredbyCCS(similartowhatisdoneforprivateinsuranceplans)
• ImprovetechnologicalresourceslikeeSARS,Pa7entPortalandProviderPortal,UpdateMTUonlineProgramandmakewebbasedandhostedbystatesoalldocumenta7onforCCSMTPclientscanbeuniversalallowingsmothertransferorcasesbetweencoun7es
• DevelopaprocessforimprovedelectronicrecordsharingamongCCSproviders
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 115
Early and Con/nuous Screening: Poten/al Priori/es
• MandatethatallCYSHCNandfamilieswillbescreenedandappropriatelyreferredtomentalhealthservices
• Reducelosstofollow-upforinfants/childrenreferredtotheHighRiskInfantFollow-upProgram(HRIF)
• EnsureCCSchildrenarereceivingyearlywell-childvisitsanddevelopmentalscreening
• Improveproac7veiden7fica7onofcasesforMTUservices
• ImproveCCSreferralspar7cularlyinWholeChildModelcoun7es
Insurance Coverage: Possible Priori/es • ExtendCCScoveragepastage21• ExpandmedicalcriteriaorchangeittobemoreinclusiveofmoreCYSHCNcondi7ons(doesnotaddressemergentcondi7onsthatdon’tqualify)
• IncreasereimbursementratesforMedi-Calproviders
• IncreasereimbursementratesforvendorsthatprovideDMEtoCCSCYSHCN
• EnsurethatMedi-Calcoverscareun7lCCSeligibilityisdetermined• Medi-CalManagedCareHealthPlansneedtoallowsecondarydiagnosesinordertomi7gatedelaysincare
• Financialcriteriaistoolow,itneedstobeincreased,ideallywithconsidera7onofloca7onandfamilysize.
• Increasefundingforaddressingsocialneeds
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 117
Transi/on to Adulthood: Poten/al Priori/es
• Bolsterandimprovetransi7onresources
• IncreaseCCSsocialworkerstafftoaddresstransi7ontoadultcare
• DevelopaplantofindadultprovidersthatworkwithSHCNpa7entssothattheycanbeusedaresourceduringtransi7on
• ExtendCCSbeyond21• Transi7onprepara7onwithotherCYSHCNshouldbebuiltintospecialtycare
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 118
Organiza/on of Services: Poten/al Priori/es
• MandatethatallCYSHCNandfamilieswillbescreenedandappropriatelyreferredtomentalhealthservices
• Reducelosstofollow-upforinfants/childrenreferredtotheHighRiskInfantFollow-upProgram(HRIF)
• EnsureCCSchildrenarereceivingyearlywell-childvisits
• Improveproac7veiden7fica7onofcasesforMTUservices
• ImproveCCSreferralspar7cularlyinWholeChildModelcoun7es
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 119
Breakout Group: Assign Task Instruc/ons
• Selectrecordertoenterinfointothelaptop
• Selectrecordertowriteonposterpaper• Selectpresentertoreportbackforthegroup
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 120
Breakout Groups: Mission
• Reviewdrazlistofproblems/issuesand◦ Addproblems/issuesifmissing◦ Deleteproblems/issuesifredundant,ornotneeded◦ Rewordlistedproblems/issuesintopriori7es/goals
GOAL:Manageablelistofpriori7esforstakeholderstorank
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 121
Next Steps: Ranking/Scoring Priori/es
• Listofpriori7eswillbeenteredintoonlinesurveyorStakeholderswillbeemailedPriori7za7onspreadsheettocomplete
• Stakeholderswillrateeachpriorityusingthe6priori7za7oncriteriadevelopedwithStakeholderworkgroup
• Criterionweightswillbeapplied,usingtheweightthemostStakeholdersselectedforeachcriteria
• Finalscoresforlistofpriori7eswillbesharedwithStakeholders
• DHCS/ISCDwillmakethefinaldetermina7onofthepriori7estobeaddressed
Next Steps: Developing Ac/on Plans
• Addi7onalanalysesofdatafortoppriorityareas• Inclusionandsharingofaddi7onalrelevantdata• Con7nuedinvolvementofstakeholdersandstateandlocalCCSstaffinthedevelopmentofac7onplans
• Establishperformancemeasurestoevaluateimplementa7onofac7onplans
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 123
References • CaliforniaSpecialtyCareCoali7onSurvey,2019
• CaliforniaStateAuditor(2019).MillionsofChildreninMedi-CalAreNotReceivingPreventa#veHealthServices.CaliforniaStateAuditorReport2018-111.hgps://www.auditor.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/2018-111.pdf
• ChildandAdolescentHealthMeasurementIni7a7ve.2016-2017Na7onalSurveyofChildren’sHealth(NSCH)dataquery.DataResourceCenterforChildandAdolescentHealthsupportedbyCoopera7veAgreementU59MC27866fromtheU.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices,HealthResourcesandServicesAdministra7on’sMaternalandChildHealthBureau(HRSAMCHB).Retrieved[mm/dd/yy]fromwww.childhealthdata.org.
• HealthResourcesandServicesAdministra7on(HRSA),MaternalandChildHealthBureau(MCHB).ChildrenwithSpecialHealthCareNeeds.hgps://mchb.hrsa.gov/maternal-child-health-topics/children-and-youth-special-health-needs
• Hintz,S.R.,Gould,J.B.,Benneg,M.V.,Lu,T.,Gray,E.E.,Jocson,M.A.,...&Lee,H.C.(2019).FactorsAssociatedwithSuccessfulFirstHigh-RiskInfantClinicVisitforVeryLowBirthWeightInfantsinCalifornia.TheJournalofpediatrics.
• Tang,B.,Lee,H.C.,Gray,E.E.,Gould,J.B.&Hintz,S.R.(2019).Programma7candAdministra7veBarrierstoHigh-RiskInfantFollow-UpCare.AmericanJournalofPerinatology.
Thank you for your par/cipa/on!
UCSFFAMILYHEALTHOUTCOMESPROJECT 125
Thank You