Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

17
Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X- ray diffraction and SANS Supervisor Dr A. I. Kuklin Rafał Idczak University of Wrocław JINR Summer Student Practicies 2010, Dubna

description

Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS. Supervisor Dr A. I. Kuklin. Rafał Idczak University of Wrocław. JINR Summer Student Practicies 2010, Dubna. The goal of the project at JINR Dubna summer practice. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Page 1: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

SupervisorDr A. I. Kuklin

Rafał IdczakUniversity of Wrocław

JINR Summer Student Practicies 2010, Dubna

Page 2: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

The goal of the project at JINR Dubna summer practice

1 – recalculation of angles in XPD method

2 – determination of nanodiamonds lattice parameters

3 – determination of nanodiamonds size of domains

4 – estimation of influence of sample size on resolution in SANS

5 – comparison between the SANS spectrometers with and without TOF method

Page 3: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Recalculation angles in XPD

cos

cos

sintan

L

L

2cos

tan

cossin

L

Page 4: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Recalculation for Al2O3

Page 5: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Recalculation for Al2O3

Number of peak α + β 2α

1 34.433 35.1462 37.020 37.7713 42.513 43.347

2costan

cossin

L

019.0L

Page 6: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Recalculation for nanodiamonds

Number of peak α + β 2α

1 43.017 43.897

2 74.208 75.909

3 90.059 92.331

Page 7: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Nanodiamonds size of domains

cos

FK

Scherrer equation

K – shape factor (K = 1)F – FWHMθ – Bragg angle (2θ = 2α)λ – wavelength (λ = 1.5405 Å)τ – mean size of domains

Number of peak FWHM θ τ [Å]

1 1.9828 21.729 47.919

2 2.3381 37.529 47.608

3 2.2535 45.598 55.978

Page 8: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Estimation of influence of sample size on resolution in SANS

L

d tantan

Ld

tan

tan

for , 0

d = 5 – 20 mm

L = 2 – 12 m

= 0.7 – 10 Å

12

sin4

2sin

4

Ld

Qres

Page 9: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Q resolution for λ = 0.7 Å

Page 10: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Q resolution for λ = 5 Å

Page 11: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Q resolution for λ = 10 Å

Page 12: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

YuMO - Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute of Nuclear Physics, Dubna, Russia.

1, 2, 3 – pulse reactor parts4, 6 – collimators5 – vacuum tube7 – thermostate8 – table for sample10, 11 – Vn standards12 - 14 – detectors

Page 13: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

D11 – Institute Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France

Main differences between YuMO and D11

1 – D11 has got 1 PSD detector, YuMO has got 2 detectors2 – YuMO has got Vanadium standard before detectors3 – YuMO hasn’t got neutron guide (vacuum tube)

Page 14: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Comparison of the main feature of SANS spectrometers with and without TOF

YuMO D11With TOF

↓Wavelength resolution (1%)

Without TOF↓

Wavelength resolution (5-10%)

Pulsed reactor source↓

Power of the flux 2 MW

Continuous reactor source↓

Power of the flux 50 MW

Two detectors system↓

Better dynamic Q rate (Qmax/Qmin)

Power of the flux + neutron guide + collimation

↓Better Q-range and background

Vanadium standards before detectors↓

Calibration during measurements

Additional calibration measurements needed

Page 15: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Conclusions1 – It was shown that continuous and pulsed sources have both advantages and disadvantages in characteristics of main features

2 – We obtained the mean size of domains for nanodiamonds sample is 50.5(2.7) Å.

3 – We calculated that resolution dependence of size d of the measured sample in SANS experiment is also dependent of L and .

d ↑ Qres ↓

L ↑ Qres ↑

λ ↑ Qres ↑

Page 16: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Special thanks to:

Dr A. I. Kuklin (FLNP, JINR, Dubna)

Dr S. Z. Pakuliak (BLTP JINR, Dubna)

Dr W. Chmielowski (JINR, Dubna)

Dr hab. R. Zawodny (UAM, Poznań)

Page 17: Calculation dependence of shift and size of the sample for X-ray diffraction and SANS

Thank you for attention