CAER Safety Summit CalARP Audit Trends

19
Cho Nai Cheung Accidental Release Prevention Engineer, Supervisor Hazardous Materials Programs June 14 th , 2012

description

CAER Safety Summit CalARP Audit Trends. Cho Nai Cheung Accidental Release Prevention Engineer, Supervisor Hazardous Materials Programs June 14 th , 2012. Presentation Overview. Facility Audit Trends Audit findings by Program Level Results of Safety Culture Survey - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of CAER Safety Summit CalARP Audit Trends

Cho Nai CheungAccidental Release Prevention Engineer, SupervisorHazardous Materials Programs

June 14th, 2012

Facility Audit Trends

Audit findings by Program Level

Results of Safety Culture Survey

Impact of Safety Programs

2June 14, 2012

Nox Reduction Pollution Abatement (13)

Chemical Mfg Plants (11) Water Treatment (11) Ammonia Refrigeration

(8)

Petroleum Refineries (4)

Swimming Pools (1) Hazardous Waste

Storage Facility (1)

June 14, 2012’ 3

June 14, 2012 4

Audit every three years Track previous actions in new audits Ensures and Considers “ensure” actions not the best indicator Number of ensures over time

June 14, 2012 5

June 14, 2012 6

June 14, 2012 7

June 14, 2012 8

June 14, 2012 9

June 14, 2012 10

June 14, 2012 11

◦ PHA (10% overall,13% P2,13% P3) Recommendation tracking, timely Program 3: siting, seismic revalidation, HF,

previous incidents, Program 2: revalidation, inspect equipment

◦ Operating Procedures (10%,14%.11%) COD, Program 3: S&H information/PPE,

certification Program 2: missing procedure for task,

shutdown procedure (emergency & normal), start-up

June 14, 2012 12

◦ Hazard Assessment (7% overall,11% P2, 9% P3) WCS & ARS background documentation,

parameters, OCA update

◦ Training (6%, 9%, 7%) Refresher training, Records Program 2: initial training, contractor Program 3: document training was

understood

June 14, 2012

June 14, 2012 14

◦ Operating Procedures (14%) COD, S&H information/PPE, certification

◦ CSE (13%) Review cancelled permits, permit and

conditions, rescue plan

◦ PHA (11%) Incidents reviewed, document

recommendation & tracking, seismic revalidation

◦ MOC (10%) Document training (op & maintenance), MOC for operating procedure, proper

authorization

June 14, 2012 15

◦ Inherently Safer System (21%) PHA recommendations analyzed for ISS

categories (I,P,A,P) and approach (m,s,m,s), ISS for new process and guidance

◦ Latent Conditions Checklist (13%) Sign-off, feedback, rationale for

customization, tracking of training and recommendations

◦ Operating Procedures (13%) Evaluating HF, task/gap analysis,

procedure writing training

◦ Safety Culture (11%)

Completed survey of employees No of Deficiencies:

◦ Range: 2 – 6

◦ Average: 3.3 (28%)

◦ Median: 2

June 14, 2012 16

Develop metrics (100%) Milestones in improvement plans (67%) Various requirements (33%):

◦ Evaluate work groups◦ Identification of target◦ Assessment having all required component◦ Records maintained◦ Report out to the workforce

June 14, 2012 17

June 14, 2012 18

Cho Nai CheungTelephone: (925) 335-3212

E-Mail: [email protected]

Website: http://www.cchealth.org/groups/hazmat

Jun2 14, 2012 19