The why, the what, the who, and the how much

| 05 -05-2015 | © 2015 Canopy 3

Large manufacturers need to answer the following question

How to:

▶ collaborate on large digital design files productively

▶ with of business partners and users spread all over the world

▶ whilst protecting the Intellectual Property?

▶ Offering an attractive workplace to existing and new talent?

Without increasing IT Spending?

Why?

| 05 -05-2015 | © 2015 Canopy 5

Firewall

What is CAD virtualisation?

DC LAN (40 GBit)

CAD Files Private VDI Cloud

“on steroids”

What

▶ The Private VDI Cloud is set up “on premise” (behind the firewall) directly connecting to the PDM system in the data center to ensure highest speed data processing, it is usable for your users and business partners with the CAD (and Cax) applications

▶ Only pixels and operator commands are streamed back-and-forth between the clients and the Private , ensuring highest security and speed

▶ CAD virtualisation maximizes the efficiency of PLM deployments

Virtual desktops “on steroids” in a private cloud to stream Interactive CAD sessions (rather than endlessly moving and copying CAD files)

PDM System

| 05 -05-2015 | © 2015 Canopy 7

No plans Proof of Technology (PoT) Pilot Rollout to Production

1-2 users < 10% of user population >> 10% users

▶ Initial ideation ▶ Proof of Technology to compare virtual performance with physical hardware

▶ Compliance with Customer’s (security etc.) rules and required connections to e.g. Teamcenter

▶ Proof the business case

▶ Rollout in waves, e.g. start with suppliers, then rollout for remote locations and finally as the refresh program of Workstations in central locations

Who is using CAD virtualization?

*n = 83 European customers in the Manufacturing Industry with more than 100 CAD users

No plans;

41%

Proof of

Technology;

33%

Pilot; 22%

Rollout; 5% Benelux &

Nordics

8%

Austria

1%

France

17%

Germany

59%

Italy

4% UK &

Ireland

11%

Fig-1: Stage of CAD virtualiation* Fig-2: location of population

| 05 -05-2015 | © 2015 Canopy 9

How…to deal with latency?

▶ under 100 ms the human brain cannot notice a delay in the response of the virtual clients; to the user feel that the system is reacting instantaneously

▶ Higher latency (< 200 ms) might be acceptable, in combination with lesser sensitive Spaceball/Mouse settings

▶ For Global coverage, the latency dictates 3 hubs (EMEA/NAM/APAC)

„100 ms“ range =Hub

| 05 -05-2015 | © 2015 Canopy 11

The hard benefits of CAD virtualisation

Status Quo CAD virtualisation

CAD Engineering Cost 54% 47%

Supply Chain Cost 41% 35%

IT Cost 5% 4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

To

tal C

osts

▶ Improve Designer utilization

▶ Performance boost ▶ Drawing reduction

▶ Eliminate BYOWorkstation

▶ Reduce „offline“ errors ▶ Rightshoring

▶ Replace Workstations w/desktops

▶ Reduce file duplication ▶ Simpliyfy CAD upgrades

Providing answers

| 05 -05-2015 | © 2015 Canopy 13

“How is CAD Virtualization different from a Terminal Server Farm?”

High Image Quality

Interactivity

High Business

impact

3D graphics

Heavy Users Many Applications

Light Users Fewer Applications

vGPU

Virtualized 3D Hardware Graphics Resources

Intense editing

--VRAM ++ VRAM MS/Office

Light client App

Data entry

vDGA

GPU PCI Passthrough

Heavy Users Native Driver

Price more important than performance

Performance more important than price

Terminal-server/classic virtual client

Virtualized CAD Environment

Task worker Productivity/ Knowledge worker

Desktop power users

Workstation users

Basic data entry/usage is central to work

Standard productivity tools are central to work

Some compute intensive apps, require 3D graphics performance

Workstation class performance for compute with dedicated graphics

| 05 -05-2015 | © 2015 Canopy 14

“How well does a virtual graphical client perform?” Technical benchmark results

Virtual client performs significantly better than physical client

| 05 -05-2015 | © 2015 Canopy 15

“How well does a virtual graphical client perform?” User Experience results

| 05 -05-2015 | © 2015 Canopy 16

„Is bandwith a major factor in the performance?“

Measured bandwidth consumption with different PCoIP Settings

PCoIP Settings

| 05 -05-2015 | © 2015 Canopy 17

How to address the ‚100 ms‘ limitiation?“

Location 3 e.g. APAC

Location 2 e.g. NAM

Central Data Center, e.g. EMEA

Location 1

WAN

(W)LAN/WAN/Internet

LAN

/Inte

rnet

Management/ Monitoring

Branch with limited users

PDM/File Server

Branch with many users or outside of the 100ms Latency region

PDM/File Server

Atos, das Atos Logo, Atos Consulting, Atos Worldgrid, Worldline, BlueKiwi, Bull, Canopy the Open Cloud Company, Yunano, Zero Email, Zero Email Certified und The Zero Email Company sind eingetragene Warenzeichen der Atos Gruppe. May 2015 © 2015 Atos.

Confidential information owned by Atos, to be used by the recipient only. This document, or any part of it, may not be reproduced, copied, circulated and/or distributed nor quoted without prior written approval from Atos.

© Confidential

For more information please contact:

Don Rekko

Global Sales Head – PLM

M+ 49 151 212 87097 don.rekko@canopy-cloud.com

Thanks