CA18110 - Underground Built Heritage as catalyser for...

CA18110 - Underground Built Heritage as catalyser for Community Valorisation

First MC meetingBrussels, April 9th 2019

Underground4Value - First MC meeting Brussels, April 9th 2019

Selection of:

a. The Grant Holder Institution (Scientific Representative)

b. The FSAC rate for the Grant Holder institution

The GRANT HOLDER Candidate:

Institute of Studies on Mediterranean Societies


• Founded in 1923

• The largest public research institution in Italy.

• Highly specialized workforce of 11.000 people (over 90% employed in R&D).

• Mission:

• to perform research

• to promote innovation and competitiveness of the national industrial system

• to promote the internationalization of the national research system

• to provide technologies and solutions to emerging public and private needs

• to advice Government and other public bodies

• to contribute to the qualification of human resources.

• Distributed all over the country through institutes, departments and research areas

• The territorial distribution facilitates contacts and cooperation with local authorities, firms and communities.


• The Institute of Studies on Mediterranean Societies is a CNR Institute, and associate to the Department of “Social sciences, humanities, and cultural heritage”

• Mission:

• The regional focus on the Mediterranean countries

• Multidisciplinary analyses intersecting historical, economic, geographical and sociological models and methodologies

• Explanation of environmental, economic and social phenomena

• Projections on possible future scenarios and policy guidelines that can support targeted interventions to reduce imbalances and stimulate sustainable development in the area

• Comparative and prospective analysis of governance and institutional building processes and their functioning in the European and Euro-Mediterranean context

• Study of: territory, environment and landscape as factors of development and stability; trade flows and logistics; migration and socio-cultural phenomena.



The Challenge:• The main aim and objective of the Action is to promote Underground Built Heritage as a valuable

resource to celebrate and preserve and, when sustainable, to re-use and valorise, realising its full potential to support local communities’ development.

Research Objectives:• O1: Managing and treasuring the wide-ranging participants’ competencies

• O2: Setting up and coordinating small teams of participants for performing every year four case-studies assessments

• O3: Interacting with local communities, disseminating innovative thinking and supporting them to explore alternative social trajectories

• O4: Improving network openness by delivering presentations at regional and local conferences

Capacity Building Objectives:• O5: Providing a balanced and sustainable methodology for supporting the conservation and re-use of the UBH

• O6: Developing new skills for planners, decision-makers, promoters, and local development facilitators

• O7: Realising the potential of UBH for empowering local communities



Keywords:

• Underground Built Environment

• Heritage-Led Regeneration

• Heritage Conservation Methods

• Sustainability Transition

• Technological and Social Innovation

Areas of Expertise Relevant for the Action

• Social and economic geography Spatial development, land use, regional planning; Databases, data mining, data curation, computational modelling

• History and Archeology Preservation of cultural heritage

• Civil engineering Preservation of cultural heritage

• Environmental engineering Remote sensing



• The Action is an Expert network

• Each expert will share research experience, best-practices and ideas on UBH

• They create a repository for new research and for developing training tools, open and accessible to all parties interested to the UBH

• Platform and tools provide knowledge on main technical and organisational barriers to the UBH conservation and reuse

• Knowledge contributes at:

• Promoting continuity of use and significance to the underground historic fabric, revitalizing the public realm and developing skills for townspeople.

• Assisting local communities’ decision-making with cultural, scientific and technical support from many aspects (i.e. archaeology, geo-technics, history, urban planning, cultural anthropology, economics, architecture, cultural tourism).



Deliverables:

• D1 – Underground4value website (M1)

• D2 - Survey on approaches and experiences for the UBH conservation and re-use (M3)

• D3 - Knowledge-base first-year case-studies (M6)

• D4 - Digital platform as repository of knowledge, shared experiences and dissemination results (M6)

• D5 - Textbook of the training modules on UBH conservation, planning and re-use (M10)

• D6 - First intermediate report on case-studies’ results (M12)

• D7 - First Handbook of the Underground4value Training School (M18)

• D8 – Knowledge-base second-year case-studies (M18)

• D9 - Toolkit “Procedures and protocols for assessing the state of the UBH conservation – Classification of artificial cavities” (M24)

• D10 - Toolkit “Strategic Transition Management (STM) -tools for stimulating, developing and supporting real-life experiments (Living Labs)” (M24)

• D11 - Second intermediate report on case-studies’ results (M24)

• D12 - Toolkit “New innovative technologies for the UBH knowledge, preservation, and valorisation” (M24)

• D13 - Toolkit “UBH reuse and valorisation strategies” (M24)



• D14 - Knowledge-base third-year case-studies (M30)

• D15 – Second Handbook on the Underground4value Training School (M30)

• D16 - Third intermediate report on case-studies (M36)

• D17 - Third Handbook on the Underground4value Training School (M42)

• D18 - Knowledge-base for fourth-year case-studies (M42)

• D19 - Underground4value Handbook on the sustainable re-use of the Underground Built Heritage (M48)

• D20 - Fourth Handbook on the Underground4value Training School (M48)

• D21 - Fourth intermediate report on case-studies’ results (M48)

• D22 - Final version of the Underground4value Digital platform (M48)

• D23 - Final Report on “UBH re-use and broader heritage-led regeneration case-studies: community-based development strategies”, with main research questions and all 16 case studies assessment (M48)



Activities Months 1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15 16-18 19-21 22-24 25-27 28-30 31-33 34-36 37-39 40-42 43-45 46-48

WG1: Knowledge Base Development

1.1 Methodology and outcomes

1.2 Case-Studies

1.3 Training School

WG2: UBH conservation


2.2 Case-Studies

2.3 Training School

WG3: UBH reuse and valorisation strategies


3.2 Case-Studies

3.3 Training School

WG 4: UBH planning approaches


4.2 Case-Studies

4.3 Training School

WG 5: Dissemination and exploitation

5.1: Meetings (MC and WG)

5.2: Training School "Underground4value"

5.3: Short Term Scientific Missions (STSM)

5.4: Dissemination activities and Publications

1. First Management Committee (MC) (Bxl)

2. Second MC meeting (Naples)

3. First Training School (Naples)

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

BrusselsNaples MaltaMurcia Lubjiana

4 4 4 4

Lisbon Ankara

Iglesias (IT)

PaphosAncona

Planning Tools

Local teams &

Stakeholders



UBH Case-study Selection

MC

WG1

WG2

WG3 WG4

WG5

T1 T2

T4T3

Setting-up knowledge

base

Preparing surveys and

datasets

Defining standards

and formats

Community Empowerment

Living Lab Living

Lab

Living Lab

Living Lab

Dissemination and Conferences

STSM

Science CommunicationManager

Training Facilitators

Conservation and Monitoring

ICT tools

Developing skills

UBH Regeneration

strategies

UBH classificati

on

Co

llective learn

ing

Cases storytelling

Theoretical & practical

School Handbook

Training material

One Year scheme

STSM coordinator

Tourism, creativity,

social innovation


Experts are organised in three thematic working groups:

• Underground Built Heritage conservation and monitoring (WG2)

• Underground Built Heritage reuse and valorisation strategies (WG3)

• Underground Built Heritage planning approaches (WG4)

And in two methodological and organizational ones:

• Knowledge Base Development (WG1)

• Dissemination and exploitation strategies (WG5)


Since end November 2018, it has been launched a doodle for organizing the proposers’ participation to the Working Groups


WG1 Knowledge Base Development

Sorin HermonAlberto Ferraiuolo

Aleksandra Krstić-Furundžić

Giovanni Lombardi

Ivan Sulc

Jamal RaiynMiguel Pérez de Perceval

Natália BoticaPinar KaragozReuben GrimaRoberta Varriale

Silvana Bartoletto

Julijana BojadjievaBeata Gawryszewska

WG2 UBH conservation

Alfonso BahilloAlice Tavares Costa

Anna Maria Mascolo

Antonino Barba

Fernando Álvarez Franco

Gianluca MininGiovanni Leucci

Kerim AydinerMarco LeoMirjana DevetakovićNatália Botica

Pawel Strumillo

Robert OlbrychtSebastiano D'Amico

Zili Li

WG3 UBH reuse and valorisation

strategies

César GarcíaDunja Mahne

Ernesto Marcheggiani

George Papagiannitsis

Ina Šuklje Erjavec

Kinga KimicLaura Genovese

Oana LucaOgnen MarinaPaschalis ArvanitidisRita Occhiuto

Sanja Kovačić

Sanjin MihelićShirley Cefai

Tatiana RuchinskayaVladan JeremicZoran MilovanovicYosef Preiss



WG4 UBH planning approaches WG5 UBH Dissemination and exploitation

Artan Hysa

Carlos SmaniottoDiogo MateusEgin ZekaEvangelos AsprogerakasGabriela Maksymiuk

Giuseppe Pacekatalin kolosy

Konstantinos LalenisMihaela Negulescu

Montserrat Pallares-BarberaMuge Akkar Ercan

Nataša Pichler-MilanovičPetja Ivanova-RadovanovaPietro Elisei

Yasemin Yardımcı ÇetinAndrea Cirman

Charalampos Baniotopoulos

Christine KotarosFlorin NemtanuIvor JankovićNaci PolatPreston Perluss

Renata Salvarani Silvia Corlăteanu-Granciuc

Susana Martínez RodriguezTatjana Pivac

Tony CassarDov Winer


Each WG has a leader (selected among the MC members) and co-leader

• We could discuss about having changes in the co-leaders at the end of year 2, for improving gender balance and ECI participation

Other management roles are, as follow:

• STSM coordinator

• Science Communication manager

• ITC Conf. Grant coordinator



Grant Holder Institution’s roles are as follows:

Finance and legal representative:

• Prof. Salvatore Capasso, ISSM-CNR director

Grant Holder Manager:

• Mrs Patricia Sclafani


Action Chair: Mr. Giuseppe PaceISSM-CNR (IT)

Action Vice-Chair: Dr. Susana Martínez-Rodríguez

University of Murcia


Implementation of Scientific Committee recommendations and COST policies:

- the level of involvement of Inclusiveness Target Countries (ITCs) should be maintained and a plan should be developed and implemented to ensure the full involvement of ITC representatives in all aspects of the Action's implementation (including in Action leadership positions)

- the level of involvement of Early Career Investigators (ECIs) should be increased and a plan should be developed and implemented to ensure the full involvement of ECIs in all aspects of the Action's implementation (including in Action leadership positions)

- the gender balance should be improved and a plan should be developed and implemented to ensure gender balance in all aspects of the Action's implementation (including in Action leadership positions).



Establishment of Action Management structure:

• The establishment of the Action leadership positions must respect the COST Policies and take into consideration the Scientific Committee recommendations

• For promoting a Participatory Approach to the candidatures, the main proposer invited all MCs to candidate themselves or to suggest potential candidates to the Leadership and managing roles

• Candidates have been contacted for agreeing on the proposed role

• The proposal takes into account both needs: Scientific Committee recommendations and the pool results, that is, the willingness of the MC members

• However, changes are still possible for the benefit of the Action



WG1: Knowledge Base Development


Sorin HermonThe Cyprus Institute (CY) - ITC

Proposed LEADER for:

WG2: UBH conservation

Alfonso BahilloUniversidad de Deusto (ES)

WG3: UBH reuse and valorisation strategies

Shirley CefaiUniversity of Malta (MT) - ITC

Co-Leader:

Roberta Varriale (IT)

Co-Leader:

Pawel Strumillo (PL)

Co-Leader:

Ernesto Marcheggiani (IT)


WG4: UBH planning approaches


Carlos Smaniotto CostaUniversidade Lusófona (PT) - ITC


WG5: UBH Dissemination and exploitation

Florin Nemtanu Politehnica University of Bucharest (RO) - ITC

STSM Coordinator

Muge Akkar ErcanMiddle East Technical University (TR) - ITC

Co-Leader:

Nataša Pichler-Milanovič (SI)

Co-Leader:

Charalampos Baniotopoulos (UK)


Science CommunicatonManager


Dov WinerMAKASH – CMC Applications in Educations, Culture and Science (IL)


ITC Conference Grant coordinator

Zili Li University College Cork (IE)


Agreement on MC rules (mandate):

• The MC will follow the CSO rules.

• To streamline the daily management of the Action, the MC can mandate the Chair or the Core Group on some specific tasks. • Invitation to a meeting at least 40 days before

• in case of non-response within 14 days, cancel non answered invitations to meetings and/or sent to another participant

• Claim reimbursement within 14 days after the meeting

• Agreement on the lowering of the reimbursement caps: travel: 400 €; accommodation: 100 €; with derogation upon justification

• The reimbursement caps will be agreed again for the 2nd Grant Period (i.e. increased budget)

• Underspending: mandate to use the unspent funds up to 5000 euros

• WBP: mandate to modify without MC approval if budget below 3000 euros e.g. additional STSMs, dissemination meeting




Action implementation planninga. Development of Objective Achievement Indicators for MoU Objectives – proposal to be discussed in the MC

Objective Indicators

O1 Managing and treasuring the wide-ranging participants’ competencies N. participants involved

O2 Setting up and coordinating small teams of participants for performing every year four case-studies assessments

N. STSM

O3 Interacting with local communities, disseminating innovative thinking and supporting them to explore alternative social trajectories

N. Local Stakeholders’ involved

O4 Improving network openness by delivering presentations at regional and local conferences

N. local and regional events

O5 Providing a balanced and sustainable methodology for supporting the conservation and re-use of the UBH

N. Scientific and technicalpapers

O6 Developing new skills for planners, decision-makers, promoters, and local development facilitators

N. trainees

O7 Realising the potential of UBH for empowering local communities N. living labs activated



1st Grant Period (GP)Grant Period Goals, WG tasks and deliverables

Grant Period Goal WG Task D

Surveying participants’ experiences WG1 Elaborating and conducting a survey among participants on approaches and experiences for the UBH conservation, re-use, and planning (e-survey)

D2

Collecting experiences in a knowledge-base toolbox

WG1 Design of a UBH toolbox, and starting collection (investigation methodology, history background, bibliography, main stakeholders, problems, perspectives) -interaction with WG2, 3, and 4

D3

Making results available on the Underground4value website and the Digital platform

WG1 Production of a digital platform as repository of knowledge, shared experiences and dissemination results (data-set and interactive module, to update continuously)

D4

Managing the case-studies’ assessment WG1 Preparing a “Knowledge-base for first-year case-studies” (WG1); organizing STSMs in the 4 selected UBH sites, supported by local proposers (WG5); Collecting the small teams’ assessments (WG1)

D5

Opening the network to partnerships with local management frameworks

WG4 Pioneering socially and environmentally innovative solutions in local small meetings and stimulating a “living lab” approach in the four case-studies

D10

Promoting the Action in international and regional conferences

WG5 Scientific and technical papers, supporting ECI participation , Network members as referees for the papers



1st Grant Period (GP)Grant Period Goals, WG tasks and deliverables

Grant Period Goal WG Task D

Collecting the state-of-the-art of UBH conservation

WG2 Procedures and protocols for assessing the state of the UBH conservation –Classification of artificial cavities –New innovative technologies for the UBH knowledge, preservation, and valorization: to test on the case-studies’experiences (online toolbox)

D5

Collecting the state-of-the-art of UBH reuse

WG3 UBH reuse and valorisation strategies: to test on the case-studies’ experiences(online toolbox)

D5

Organise and manage a training school programme on UBH

WG5 ChooseTrainers; organise trainees selection; Preparing training tools and textbookManaging the training school; Publishing papers, prepared by students and tutors

D5D7

Preparing support tools for managing meetings and living labs’ start-ups with local stakeholders

WG4 Collecting state-of-the-art; Preparing support tools for STMS; Training modules for community empowerment; Drafting the toolkit

D10



1st Grant Period (GP)Activity and budget planning (Work and Budget Plan preparation)

https://e-services.cost.eu/action/grants/contract/step3/12242 ()

https://e-services.cost.eu/action/grants/contract/step3/12242



1st Grant Period (GP)

Dissemination strategy/ planning (Publications and outreach activities)

• Preparation of a Dissemination and Exploitation Plan

• International Conferences for promoting the Action

• Next WGs meeting in Ancona (tentative date: June 6-7)

• Website – science communication manager + support team for developing interactive tools

• Logo (still temporary): competition? Let’s organize a board, a make proposals

• Editorial board?

Webmaster: Ms Olga Lo Presti ISSM-CNR



1st Grant Period (GP)

International participation: vote on NNC and IPC

• One request at :

• Tunisia - Dr. Amine HAJ TAIEB

• Two of our proposers have been considered by Belgium as EU Organization, and can join us only as International Organisation:

• AEIDL, the European Association for Information on Local Development



Any Other Business (AOB)

Thank you!!!!

See you next MC meeting in Naples February 2020

CA18110 - Underground Built Heritage as catalyser for...

Documents

Transcript of CA18110 - Underground Built Heritage as catalyser for...