C HAPTER 7
description
Transcript of C HAPTER 7
CHAPTER 7
ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Ideas for the Chapter
Variety of methodologies that may be employed at different design stages will be discussed in this chapter :
Section A : Tier 1 Environmental Performance Tools
Section B : Tier 2 Environmental Performance Tools
Introduction to Tier 3 Environmental Performance Tools.
Environmental Performance Evaluation (EPE) – Goals
An internal management process that provides information to facilitate management decisions regarding an
organization’s environmental performance
Supported by ISO 14001 – Environmental management systems – Specifications with guidance for use, 1996, 2003.
By means of the tool ISO/TC 207/SC 4 - develops international guidance on EPE, and,
ISO 14031 – Environmental management – Environmental performance evaluation – Guidelines, 1999
ISO/TR 14032 – Environmental management - Examples of EPE, 1999
The EPE in context of the ISO 14000 Series: Environmental Management
NEW ITEM: ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION( TR 14063)
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
ISO 14001/ 4 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION 14030 SERIES
LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT 14040
SÉRIES
ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING 14010 SERIES
(19011)DESIGN FOR
ENVIRONMENT TR 14062
ENVIROMENTAL LABELLING 14020
SERIES
FOCUS: Organizations FOCUS: Product
Objectives and Benefits of an EPE Program
• Better understanding of an organization’s impacts on the environment,
• Providing a basis for benchmarking management, operational and environmental performance,
• Identifying opportunities for improving efficiency of energy and resource usage,
• Determining whether environmental objectives and targets are being met,
• Demonstrating compliance with regulations,• Determining proper allocation of resources,• Increasing the awareness of employees, and,• Improving community and customer relations
EPE Indicators
Environmental performance indicators
(EPIs)- Management performance indicators (MPIs): policy, people, planning activities, practice, procedures, decisions and actions in the organization
- Operational performance indicators (OPIs): inputs, the supply of inputs, the design, installation, operation and maintenance of the physical facilities and equipment, outputs and their delivery
Environmental condition indicators (ECIs)
Provide information about the local, regional, national or global condition of the environment
INTEREST: Help an organization to better understand the actual impact or potential impact of its environmental aspects and assist in the planning and implementation of the EPE
Plan-Do-Check-Act Model: ISO 14031
Plan-Do-Check-Act Model: ISO 14031....
PlanObjective: Selection of
indicators based on- significant environmental
aspects- Environmental
performance criteria (internal and regulatory)
- Views of interested parties (business plan)
Indicators: ECI, EPI, MPI and OPI (see table for examples)
Do – assessing performance- Collecting data -regulations,
operating permits, EMS procedures and records, reports government agencies (production, process, monitoring), environmental budgets, chemical inventories, storage tanks and spill records.
- Converting data to information
- Evaluating the information- Communicating the results
Examples of performance indicators and metrics1
OPI MPI ECIRaw material used per unit of product (Kg/unit)
Environmental costs or budget ($/yr)
Contaminant concentration in ambient air (µg/m3)
Energy used annually per unit of product (MJ/1000 L product)
Percentage of environmental targets achieved (%)
Frequency of photochemical smog events (#/yr)
Energy conserved (MJ) Number employees trained (% # trained/to be trained)
Contaminant concentration in ground- or surface water (mg/L)
Number of emergency events or unplanned shutdowns (#/yr)
Number of audit findings (#) Change in groundwater level (m)
Average fuel consumption of vehicle fleet (L/100 Km)
Time spent to correct audit findings (person-hr)
Contaminant concentration in surface soil (mg/Kg)
Hazardous waste generated per unit of product (Kg/unit)
Time spent responding to environmental incidents (person-hr/yr)
Concentration of a contaminant in the tissue of a specific local specie (µg/Kg)
Emissions of specific pollutants to air (Ton CO2/yr)
Number of complaints from public or employees (#/yr)
Population of an specific species within a defined area (#/m2)
Wastewater discharged per unit of product (1000 L/unit)
Number of suppliers contacted about environ. mngment. (#/yr)
Fish deaths in a specific watercourse (#/yr)
Air emissions were exceeded (days/yr)
Management levels with specific environ responsabilities (#)
Employee blood lead levels (µg/100 mL)
Plan-Do-Check-Act Model: ISO 14031....
Check and Act – reviewing and improving performance
Objective: To identify opportunities for improving environmental performance including
- Program cost and benefit- Progress towards meeting
environmental performance targets
- How appropriate are the environmental performance criteria and indicators
- Data quality and collection methods
Case study1
Implementation of EPE at Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Ltd., New Delhi, India, 2001Problem: the dairy was monitoring liquid fuel and electric power consumption together with the volume of wastewater processed in the effluent treatment systemEPE strategy: all parameters were normalized using the volume of milk processedResults: the dairy increased the amount of milk processed per unit of electrical power (23%) an diesel fuel consumed (38%) and reductions of wastewater generated (20%)
Case Study: Mother Dairy Company - EPIs
Objective Program Performance Indicators Indicator Type
Well water conservation
Rain water harvesting Static well water level
Well water analysis
ECI
ECI
Water use reduction Water audit Well water used per volume of milk processed (L water/L milk)
OPI
Wastewater treatment efficiency
Microbiological analysis of sludge
Use of improved microculture
Effluent processed (L)
Energy consumed (MJ/L effluent)
OPI
OPI
Employee training and awareness
Environmental awareness training
# Employees trained MPI
Green horticulture On and off-site gardening
Biosludge composting by vermiculture
# Plantings
Quantity of compost produced (Kg)
OPI
OPI
Example of EPE’s application: Measuring Environmental Performance of Industry (MEPI)
Project in Europe
MEPI’s Objective: the improvement of internal and external transparency about the effects on the environment and responses to mitigate them
MEPI’s Tools: Environmental Performance Indicators – physical, business and environmental impact
MEPI’s Focus: materials and energy use and waste emissions at the level of plant and firm
Tools (indicators) in the MEPI Project
Business activity
Physical indicators
Business management
indicators
Impact indicators
Value added (Sales – Cost of materials)
Sales
Operating profit
Number of employees
Energy and water inputs
Waste generation
CO2, SO2, Nox and VOC’s emissions to air
COD/BOD, N, P, heavy metals emissions to water
Certifications ISO 14001 and/or EMAS (yes / no)
Disclosure of environmental investments (yes / no)
Number of non-compliance events reported
Emissions of ozone depleting substances to air
MEPI’s indicators include: generic (Table) and sector - specific
Most significant variables influencing environmental performance in the Paper, Fertiliser and Electricity
Industry in European Countries
Sector Waste emissiones
Air emissions
Water emissions Water consumption
Energy consumption
Paper
N=270
Total solid waste(53)
Recycled waste(71)
CO2 (63)
SO2 (44)
COD (107)
N (91)
P (54)
Total water consumption (120)
Total energy input (39)
Fertiliser
N=91
Total solid waste (10)
SO2 (13)
NOx (15)
COD (9); N (20); P (12); Heavy metals (17)
Total water consumption (26)
Total energy input (26)
Electricity
N=184
Total solid waste (75)
CO2 (118)
NOx (134)
SO2 (135)
No variables selected due to missing values
Total fuel (16; total oil (78); Renewables (20); Total energy (10)
Numbers in parenthesis indicate available cases of the total (n)
Environmental Performance Tools
Section A
Tier 1
Environmental Performance Main Tools
• Economic Criteria
• Environmental Criteria (Persistence and Bioaccumulation)
• Toxicity Criteria and Weighting
• Evaluating Alternative Synthetic Pathways
• Input and Output Structures Known
• Chemical Structures are Known
• Many Alternative Pathways Exist
Design Synthesis Steps
Economic Criteria
Estimate the cost of raw materials versus the value and/or cost of byproducts and products.
The cost of the various options can be estimated by:
This is more of a qualitative analysis because it does not take into account other potential costs associated with the production of the given substance (i.e. higher temperatures require more energy, etc).
ii tcoefficientricStoichiomeCostCost *
Environmental Criteria
• It only takes into account the substances’ Persistent, Toxic and Bioaccumulating properties.
• Persistence and Bioaccumulation are easily estimated and a table shows rating index values on the following slide.
Rating Index (RI)
PersistenceRapid >60% degradation over 1 week RI = 0
Moderate >30% degradation over 28 days RI = 1
Slow <30% degradation over 28 days RI = 2
Very slow <30% degradation over more than 28 days RI = 3
BioaccumulationHigh Potential 8.0 > log Kow > 4.3 or BCF > 1000 RI = 3
Moderate Potential 4.3 > log Kow > 3.5 or 1000 > BCF > 250 RI = 2
Low Potential 3.5 > log Kow or 250 > BCF RI = 1
Source : Green Engineering text, Allen and Shonnard, pp. 204
Toxicity Evaluations Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) :
– Definition : Airborne concentration limit for individual exposures
in a workplace environment.
– Established by : ACGIH -http://www.acgih.org
Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) : – Definition : similar to TLV ; represents the legal implications in
defining workplace conditions.
– Established by : OSHA -http://www.osha.gov/
Recommended Exposure Limits (RELs) :– Definition : more current then PELs ; solely based on toxicity
research.
– Established by : NIOSH -http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/homepage.html
One Toxicity Index can be calculated using :
)(1
TLVIndextalEnvironmen
Toxicity Index
Source : Green Engineering, Allen and Shonnard, pp 205.
Toxicity Weighting
Taking into account ingestion pathways :- Inhalation Reference Concentration
- Oral Ingestion Slope Factor
- Unit Risk
- IRIS database is one source of data : http://www.epa.gov/ngispgm3/iris/subst/index.html
The toxic weighting factor (Ftox) represents the “weight” to be given to each substance to make possible the comparison of the discharges.
The toxic weighting factor is defined as the inverse of the most stringent water quality criterion for each substance (MSCi):
Ftox i = 1/MSCi
MSCi = min (CTACi, CCOAi)
This is a dimensionless number, and represents the toxic potential to be assigned to a given pollutant to evaluate its relative importance in the discharges.
Source: http://www.slv2000.qc.ca/plan_action/phase1/chimiotox_a.pdf
Evaluating Alternative
• A general Composite Index of the overall input-output structure can be established with the substance’s PBT properties and can also rely on the emission rates.
Synthetic Pathways
• Methods of applying Weighting Factors : 1) Toxicity as Weighting Factor.
2) US EPA Toxicity Approach.
3) Using PBT Weighting Factors.
Environmental Performance Tools
Section BTier 2
Tier 2 :Environmental Performance Tools
• Environmental Release Assessment• Release Quantification Methods• Modeled Release Estimates• Release Characterization and Documentation• Assessing Environmental Performance
Topics covered in this section:
• Preliminary Process Flowsheets.
• Basic Knowledge of Unit Operations.
• Rough Estimate of Unit Operation Sizing.
Design Synthesis Steps
Basic information needed
Environmental Release Assessment
Environment includes : - Water - Air - Land
Releases may include : Spilling - Leaking - Pumping
Pouring - Emitting - Emptying
Discharging - Injecting - Escaping
Leaching - Dumping into the environment
Disposing into the environment
Necessary Knowledge about Releases
Release Assessment Components
Determine best method for quantifying the
release rate of each WES
Obtain/Diagram A processFlowsheet
Determine data/infoneeded to use the
methods determined
Identify Purposeand Need for
Release Assessment
Identify and ListWaste and Emission
Streams (WESs)
Document release assessment; include characterization of
estimate uncertainties
Quantify chemical’s release rates +
frequencies + the media in which it is released
Collect data + info to fill in the gaps
Determine Additional
WESs
Process Analysis When analyzing flowsheets, account for missing
releases that include : – Fugitive Emissions (which include leaks).– Venting of Equipment (including breathing and
displacement losses).– Periodic Equipment Cleaning (frequent and infrequent).– Transport Container Residuals (including drums, totes,
tank trucks, rail cars and barges).– Incomplete Separations (including destilation, gravity
phase separation and filtration).
• Determining the manner in which substances are released is crucial in assessing environmental impacts
• Releases can also occur on and off site, including : - Air : include primary and secondary emissions.
- Water : transfers into streams or water bodies.
- Underground Injection : generally into wells.
- Land : within the boundaries of the facility.
Process Analysis... continues
There are different dispersion patterns to high-stack (over 75 meters), medium-stack (25 meters–75 meters) and low-stack sources (less than 25 meters).
High-stack sources are synonymous with modern power plants; medium-stack sources with large industrial plants, district heating plants, and suboptimal power utilities; and low-stack, or low-level, sources with small industrial and commercial users, transport, and the domestic sector.
Air: Primary EmissionsStacks Emissions
Source: http://lnweb18.worldbank.org/SAR/sa.nsf/Attachments/FFCh2/$File/FFCh2.pdf
Air: Secondary EmissionsFugitive Emissions
The sources of fugitive emissions are categorized as (1) industrial processes, operations, activities, or materials that emit particulate or chemical pollutants or (2) activities or operations that create fugitive dust.
Particulates that become airborne by wind and/or human activity are also referred to as fugitive dust.
Source: http://www.seattle.battelle.org/forscom/Hot_Air/Fugitive.htm
Release Quantification Methods
1. Measured release data for the chemical or indirectly measured release data using mass balance or stoichiometric ratios.
2. Release data for a surrogate chemical with similar release-affecting properties and used in the same (or very similar) process. Surrogate data may be measured, indirectly measured, modeled or some combination of these.
Some emission factors would be considered to be surrogate data.
3. Modeled release estimates :
a. Mathematically modeled (eg) release estimates for the chemical or by analogy to a surrogate chemical.
b. Rule of thumb release estimates, or those being developed using engineering judgement.
• Usually only applicable for actual processes
• For a continuous process :
• Can also be estimated using the chemical’s weight fraction and the mass flowrate of the release stream
Measured Release Data for the Chemical
streamreleaseavgstreamreleaseavg Qrelease **
• By using surrogate chemical data, it should be ensured that there exist similarities in some physical/chemical properties of the chemicals, unit ops and their operating conditions and quantities of chemical throughput.
Release Data for a Surrogate Chemical
- Usually only used for Air Emissions.
- Many databases exist containing these factors.
Emission Factors
A. Average Marginal CO2 Emissions Factors for Electricity Generation by EPA Region (2000):
Source: http://www.epa.gov/appdstar/pdf/brochure.pdf
B. CO2 Emission Factors by Fuel Type per Unit Volume, Mass, and Energy:
Source: http://www.epa.gov/appdstar/pdf/brochure.pdf
Equation for Rate of Emission :
Where :
mvoc is the mass fraction of the VOC in the stream or process unit,
EFav is the average emissions factor ascribed to the stream or process unit (kg emitted/103kg throughput),
M is the mass flow rate through the unit (mass/time). See tables with lists of various factors examples.
Emissions from Process Units and Fugitive Sources
MEFmE avvoc
Losses of Residuals from Cleaning of Drums and Tanks
– Nature of the cleaning process should be considered
– Capacities.
– Shapes.
– Materials of construction of the vessels to be cleaned.
– Cleaning schedule.
– The residual quantity of the chemical in the vessels.
– The type and amount of solvent used (aq. Vs. Organic).
– Solubility/miscibility of the chemical in the solvent.
– If applicable, treatment of wastewater containing the chemical.
• Utility use is extensive in causing environmental impact. • Emission estimation equations :
Where:ED is the energy demand of a process unit (energy demand/unit/yr).EF is the emission factor for the fuel type (kg/volume of fuel combusted).FV is the fuel value (energy/volume fuel combusted).BE is the boiler efficiency (unitless; 0.75-0.9 typical values).
Secondary Emissions from Utility Sources
11 )())()(()//( BEFVEFEDyruntikgE
Where:
ED is the electricity demand of a process unit (energy demand/unit/yr).EF is the emission factor for the fuel type (kg/volume of fuel combusted).ME is the efficiency of the device.
1))()(()//( MEEFEDyrunitkgE
Modeled Release Estimates
• Process design software account for some releases, but not all. The following slides will introduce information that allows the calculation of the missed releases :- Loading transport containers
- Evaporative losses from static liquid pools
- Storage tank working and breathing loss.
• Quantity of evaporative losses from a loading container is a function of :- Physical and chemical characteristics of the previous
cargo- Method of unloading the previous cargo- Operations to transport the empty carrier to a loading
terminal- Method of loading the new cargo- Physical and chemical characteristics of the new cargo
Loading Transport Containers
- Evaporation Rate :
Where : G is the generation rate (lb/hr),M is the molecular weight (lb/lb mole),P is the vapor pressure (in Hg),A is the area (ft2),
Dab is the diffusion coefficient (ft2/s of a through b is air),
Vz is the air velocity (ft/min),T is the temperature (K),Δz is the pool lenght along flow direction (ft).
Evaporative Losses from Static Liquid Pools
5.011 )(32.13 zvDTAPMG zab
- Diffusion Coefficient
Where the units are :
Dab (cm2/s), M (g/gmole),
Pt (atm), T (K).
133.05.0119.15 )29(1009.4 tPMMTD
• Two types of losses exist : - Working Losses (originating from the raising
and lowering of the liquid level in the tank as a result of raw material utilization and production of product)
- Standing Losses (originating from daily temperature and ambient pressure fluctuations)
Storage Tank Working and Breathing Loss
Release Characterization and Documentation
The uncertainty depends on how well we know the process, how well we understand the estimation method and its data and parameters, and how well the method and parametersseem to match up with those expected for the actual process.
HIGH EFFICIENCY GENERATIONOF HYDROGEN FUELS USING NUCLEAR POWER
• A thermochemical water-splitting cycle is a set of chemical reactions that sum to the decomposition of water into hydrogen.
“The objective of this work is to define an economically feasible concept for the production of hydrogen, by nuclear
means, using an advanced high temperature nuclear reactor as the energy source.”
• The Sulfur-Iodine cycle, an example of a pure thermochemical water-splitting cycle.
Source: web.gat.com/hydrogen/images/pdf%20files/ brown_si_cycle.pdf
Section 1 – Chemical recycle and acid generation
Section 2 – Sulfuric acid concentration and decomposition
Section 3 – Hydrogen iodide concentration and decomposition
Assessing Environmental Performance
Two types of overall assessments can be used :
1. Evaluates the treatablility or costs of treatment of the waste streams.
2. Evaluates a set of environmental performance indicators :
a. Energy consumed from all sources within the manufacturing or delivery process per unit of manufactured output.
b. Total mass of materials used directly in the product, minus the mass of the product, per unit of manufactured output.
c. Water consumption per unit of manufactured output.
d. Emissions of targetted pollutants per unit of manufactured output.
e. Total pollutantsper unit of manufactured output.
Environmental Performance Tools
IntroductionTier 3
Introduction to Tier 3 Environmental Performance Tools
• Design synthesis steps.- Detailed process flowsheets.
- Equipment specifications.
- Energy specifications.
• Limited design alternatives to screen.
• More is known, therefore all knowledge should be incorporated into the evaluation.