Volume 8 • Issue 3 • 1000164Chem Sci J, an open access journalISSN: 2150-3494

Research Article

Azad and Gajanan, Chem Sci J 2017, 8:3DOI: 10.4172/2150-3494.1000164

Research Article Open Access

Chemical Sciences JournalChem

ical Sciences Journal

ISSN: 2150-3494

*Corresponding authors: Azad K, Department of Applied Chemistry, School forPhysical Sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow-226 025,India, Tel: +917785881643; E-mail: kumarazad20@gmail.com

Received July 12, 2017; Accepted July 17, 2017; Published August 13, 2017

Citation: Azad K, Gajanan P (2017) Photodegradation of Methyl Orange in Aqueous Solution by the Visible Light Active Co:La:TiO2 Nanocomposite. Chem Sci J 8: 164. doi: 10.4172/2150-3494.1000164

Copyright: © 2017 Azad K, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Photodegradation of Methyl Orange in Aqueous Solution by the Visible Light Active Co:La:TiO2 NanocompositeAzad K* and Gajanan PDepartment of Applied Chemistry, School for Physical Sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

AbstractIn this study, the Co:La:TiO2 nanocomposite was prepared by the wet chemical method. Synthesized TiO2 and

Co:La:TiO2 were characterized by X-Ray Diffractometer, SEM, TEM, UV- vis, FT-IR, Band gap energy and BET. The TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 were used as photocatalyst for the degradation of Methyl Blue. The XRD pattern confirmed the presence of anatase and rutile phase in the catalyst. The particle size was estimated by the Scherrer’s and found 68 and 32 nm for TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 respectively. The particle morphology of the photocatalysts was found in nanodiamension. The surface area of the photocatalysts was found 37.52 and 106.68 m2/g for TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 respectively. The band gap energy of TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 were 3.2 and 3.0 eV. The photodegradation of Methyl Orange has been found 18% and 88% at 5 pH for TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 respectively. The photodegradation of Methyl Orange has been found 19% and 98.9% at 25 ppm concentration of dye. The photodegradation of Methyl Orange has been found 25% and 96% at 800 mg/L amount of photocatalyst and 180 min illumination of visible light. The photodegradation was following the first order kinetics.

Keywords: Photodegradation; Photocatalyst; Photocatalysis; Methylorange; Nanocomposite

IntroductionDyes are not safe aggravates that are found in modern waste water

bringing about unfriendly natural issues. A large portion of the dyes utilized as a part of the pigmentation of materials, leather, paper, ceramic production, and nourishment handling are found from azo dyes. Dyes are lost with waste water in the midst of preparing [1-5]. This speaks to a tremendous danger to human and ecological wellbeing because of the poisonous quality of azo dyes [6]. The treatment of such defilements can be proficient by heterogeneous photocatalysis in light of its capability and negligible exertion and furthermore to the way that it grants complete poisonous quality of dyes to carbon dioxide and inorganic acids [7-9].

Titanium dioxide TiO2 is a most vital nanomaterial’s which has pulled in an awesome consideration because of its novel properties. Titanium dioxide TiO2 have great merits in solar powered vitality exchanging and photocatalysis of toxic substance in environmental condition. The concoction inactivity and the non-poisonous quality of TiO2 have likewise made it a predominant photocatalyst [10-13]. Titania has a substantial band hole (3.20 eV for anatase TiO2) and along these lines, just a little part of sunlight based light can be absorbed [14]. Many endeavours have been made to sensitized titanium dioxide to the entire visible range, for example, doping with d block metals [15,16], d block metal ions [17], non-metal atoms [18] and organic materials [19]. An acquaintance of dopant permits Titania with assimilating in the visible region yet this does not really imply that the doped photocatalyst has a superior photocatalytic activity. In photocatalysis, light is consumed by an adsorbed substrate. Today, semiconductors are generally chosen as photocatalysts, on the grounds that semiconductors have a narrow band gap between the valence and conduction groups [20]. With the end goal for photocatalysis to continue, the semiconductors need to assimilated vitality equivalent to or more than its vitality crevice. When TiO2 is irradiated by UV light (400 nm or less), electron is excited to generate electron (e-) hole (h+) pairs [21]. This movement of electrons forms e-/h+ or negatively charged electron/positively charged hole pairs. The hole can oxidize donor molecules. In photogenerated catalysis the photocatalytic activity (PCA) depends on the ability of the catalyst to

create electron–hole pairs, which generate free radicals able to undergo secondary reactions [22-24].

In this study, the nanocomposites of Cobalt, Lanthanum and Titania were prepared. The prepared nanocomposites used for the photodegradation of methyl orange at different parameters i.e., pH of solution, temperature of reaction, concentration of dye, amount of photocatalyst and irradiation time. The Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters were determined for the photodegradation of methyl orange.

MethodologySynthesis of Titania by wet chemical method

In this method, both TiCl4 solution (1000 mg/l) and NaOH solution (64.5 g/l) was added drop wise to water with stirring. After the resulting solution reaches pH to 7, the slurry was filtered, and the filter cake of TiO2 was washed and redispersed in water to prepare 1 M of TiO2 slurry. Resulting TiO2 slurry and an aqueous solution of HNO3 were refluxed at 95°C for 2 h, cooled to room temperature and neutralized with 28% of aqueous ammonia. Then, it was filtered, washed and calcined at 400°C [25,26].

TiCl4+4NaOH → Ti(OH)4+4NaCl

Ti(OH)4 → TiO2+2H2O

Synthesis of Co:La:TiO2 nanocomposite

In this study, Co:La:TiO2 nanocomposites were prepared by solution

Page 2 of 9

Citation: Azad K, Gajanan P (2017) Photodegradation of Methyl Orange in Aqueous Solution by the Visible Light Active Co:La:TiO2 Nanocomposite. Chem Sci J 8: 164. doi: 10.4172/2150-3494.1000164

Volume 8 • Issue 3 • 1000164Chem Sci J, an open access journalISSN: 2150-3494

impregnation method. In this method suitable quantity of prepared TiO2 (2 g) was dispersed in alcoholic cobalt acetate 10% (w/v) and lanthanum nitrate 5% (w/v). The dispersion is agitated continuously for 4 hour at 100°C temperature. After the treatment the residue was removed through filtration and was sintered for 4 hour in presence of air at 600°C by kipping it in a silica crucible inside the muffle furnace. After sintering and slow anilling to room temperature, content was taken out from furnace and was stored in air tight bottles and was used as photocatalyst [27].

TiO2+Co(CH3COO)2+La(NO3)3 → Co:La:TiO2

Characterization

The prepared samples were subjected to x-ray diffraction analysis on Powder X-Ray Diffractometer. The observed X-Ray diffractogram of samples were analyzed further to estimate average grain size in the sample by Scherrer’s calculation. Since the absorption of light by photocatalyst is the most crucial step in any photocatalysed reaction, and is decided primarily by the band gap energy of catalyst. The morphology and size of the Titania particles were determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

ResultsPhase identification by X-Ray diffraction analysis

The obtained X-Ray diffraction patterns of Titania and Co:La:TiO2 are shown in Figures 1a and 1b. The observed pattern of peaks, when compared with the standard JCPDS database, suggested that, in prepared TiO2 sample, major peaks at 2θ=25.5° 37.2, 48.3, and 54.5, which can be indexed to the (101), (004), (200), and (211) facet of anatase TiO2. While major peaks at 2θ=26.9° and 28.2° demonstrate the presence of rutile phase which can be indexed to the (110), (121), individually. In case of Co:La:TiO2 sample, the observed XRD pattern indicates not only a change in the peak intensity, compared to TiO2, but even the absence of some originally observed TiO2 peaks [28]. This is, probably, due to the change in the crystallinity and grain fragmentation, when the samples were wet impregnated by cobalt and Lanthanum.

Determination of average size of crystal in samples: The Scherrer’s calculations were attempted to know the average size of crystal in the samples [28]. Although, Scherrer’s calculations are only approximate in nature, but definitely provide a first-hand idea of the average size of the crystal in the samples, which may be quite accurate, provided the size of crystal is below 100 nm. The results of Scherrer’s calculations are presented in Table 1. The crystal size was found in the nm range.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The morphology of the samples was investigated by scanning

electron microscopy and it resumes the most interesting outcomes. Figure 2 clearly show that both the prepared samples are obtained in nanometric dimension. The size of Co:La:TiO2 was 160 nm whereas 200 nm for TiO2. This is due to the impregnation of metal ions in Titania [29].

Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)

TEM images were clearly displayed the morphology and particle size of neat TiO2 and Cobalt and lanthanum doped TiO2. From the Figure 3 we find that Cobalt and lanthanum doped modified TiO2 change the size of neat TiO2 significantly, as shown in Figure 3a and 3b. The sizes of both modified and neat TiO2 are mono disperse about 100-200 nm. Moreover, the crystal lattice line can be clearly found in the TEM images. The aggregations of both kinds of particles are caused by high surface energy; however, the agglomeration of the modified one is alleviated obviously compared with that of the neat [30].

Surface area analysis (BET)

Figure 4 demonstrated the BET and adsorption and desorption plot for the TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2. Figure 4 showed adsorption-desorption of nitrogen and with the help of nitrogen adsorption to determine the surface area, pore volume and average pore size of the TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 photocatalyst. The surface parameters of TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 was shown in Table 2. The TiO2 modified by Cobalt and Lanthanum are fragmentation to some extent during heat treatment,

25 30 35 40 45 50 55 600

50

100

150

200

R(121)

Inte

nsity

(a.u

)

2θ

A(1 0 1)

A(0 0 4)

A(2 0 0)

A(1 0 5) R

(110)

A-AnataseR-Rutile

(a)

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 600

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2θ

Inte

nsity

(a.u

.)

(b)101 A

110 A 004 R 200 A121 R105 A

A- AnataseR- Rutile

Figure 1: Observed XRD pattern (A) TiO2 (B) Co:La:TiO2.

Figure 2: SEM image of the (A) TiO2 (B) Co:La:TiO2.

Figure 3: TEM image of the (a) TiO2 (b) Co:La:TiO2.

Sample Surface area (m2/g) Pore volume (cm3/g) Pore radius (nm)TiO2 37. 52 10.132 1.21

Co:La:TiO2 106.68 9.5124 1.64

Table 2: The specific surface area, pore volume and pore radius of the TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2.

Sample Crystal SizeTiO2 68

Co:La:TiO2 32

Table 1: Average size of crystal in the samples of TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2.

Page 3 of 9

Citation: Azad K, Gajanan P (2017) Photodegradation of Methyl Orange in Aqueous Solution by the Visible Light Active Co:La:TiO2 Nanocomposite. Chem Sci J 8: 164. doi: 10.4172/2150-3494.1000164

Volume 8 • Issue 3 • 1000164Chem Sci J, an open access journalISSN: 2150-3494

leading to a marked increment of the BET surface areas and the average pore radius size and diminishing of the pore volume [31,32].

Band gap energy determination

The band gap of samples was calculated by extrapolation of the (αhv)2 versus hv plots, where α is the absorption coefficient and hv is the photon energy, hv=(1239/λ) eV. The value of hv extrapolated to α=0 gives an absorption energy, which corresponds to a band gap (Eg). Figure 5 yields an Eg value of 3.2 eV for TiO2 and 3.0 for Co:La:TiO2 [33]. The slight decrease in band gap energy in case of Co:La:TiO2, is due to formation of sub-band level between valence band and conduction band caused impregnation of Co+2 and La+3 in TiO2 host.

Adsorption study

A control experiment was first carried out under two conditions, vis (i) dye+UV (no TiO2) (ii) TiO2+dye in dark without any irradiation (Figure 6). It can be seen that under dark conditions, after 20 min the amount of catalyst adsorbed becomes constant i.e., equilibrium adsorption is achieved. The reaction of methyl orange in presence of TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 nanocomposites and UV irradiation is an example of heterogeneous catalysis. Rate laws in such reactions seldom follow proper law models and hence are inherently more difficult to formulate from the data. It has been widely accepted that heterogeneous catalytic reactions can be analyzed with the help of Langmuir Hinshelwood (LH) Model [34,35], with the following assumptions being satisfied, (i) there are limited number of adsorption sites on the catalyst and its surface is homogeneous, (ii) only one molecule can be adsorbed on one site and

monolayer formation occurs (iii) the absorption reaction is reversible in nature, and (iv) The adsorbed molecules do not react amongst themselves [36-38]. According to LH Model, following steps take place in the kinetics mechanism [39-43] (Adsorption of dye onto the catalyst surface). There are three steps of adsorption, Surface reaction,

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.400.0000.0050.0100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.045

P/Po

P/V

a (P

-Po)

BET plot of TiO2

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0

05

10152025303540

TiO2

Adsorption Desorption

V α /

cm-3

(STP

) g-1

p/p0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

P/Po

P/V

a (P

-Po)

BET plot of Co:La:TiO2

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.00

102030405060708090

100110

Adsorption Desorption

p/p0

V α /

cm-3

(STP

) g-1

Co:La:TiO2

Figure 4: BET and Adsorption desorption plot for TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2.

1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5

100

200

300

400

500

600

(αhυ)2

Energy (hυ)

3.20 eV

TiO2(a)

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0

200

400

600

800

(αhυ)2

Energy (hυ)

3.0 eV

Co:La:TiO2(b)

Figure 5: Band gap energy of (a) TiO2 (b) Co:La:TiO2.

Page 4 of 9

Citation: Azad K, Gajanan P (2017) Photodegradation of Methyl Orange in Aqueous Solution by the Visible Light Active Co:La:TiO2 Nanocomposite. Chem Sci J 8: 164. doi: 10.4172/2150-3494.1000164

Volume 8 • Issue 3 • 1000164Chem Sci J, an open access journalISSN: 2150-3494

Desorption of products from the surface.

Step 1:- D (Dye)+C (catalyst) ↔ D.C

Step 2:- D.C ↔ E.C+ Other products

Step 3:- E.C ↔ E+C

Photo-degradation of dyes

The photodegradation of Methyl Orange has been studied in the presence of TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2. The dye solution prepared in water and alcohol 10:1 (V/V) ratio. The definite amount (100-800 mg/L) of photocatalyst was dispersed in the dye solution. The dispersion was irradiated under visible light, although kept under agitation. After different time interval and different temperature the photocatalyst was separated from dispersion. The remaining concentration of dye in the dispersion mixture was determined spectrophotometrically. The photodegradation of Methyl Orange is showing in Figures 7-9.

Effect of temperature: The affected the temperature on photocatalysis reaction has not concerned enough interest. However, in this research, photodegradation of Methyl Orange has a vast effect of temperature. The photodegradation efficiency can be increased about 2-3 times if the temperature increased from 30°C to 40°C Because the solar energy include UV light, which can be used to activate the photocatalytic course, which is increase the temperature of photocatalytic system. The experiments showed that Methyl Orange were photodegraded in presence of photocatalyst and Visible light. The Methyl Orange was efficiently degraded shown in Figure 7. In presence of the Co:La:TiO2 at 40°C, 88% photodegradation was observed and 30°C 76% photodegradation observed. The obvious decrease of concentration of dye shows that the Co:La:TiO2 can serve as an effective photocatalyst as compared with pure TiO2 but in the blank experiment only 0.2% photodegradation observed due to the light radiation which causes the thermal action on the dye [44]. Co and La ions have low band gap energy than the pure Titania. Therefore the band gap energy of Co:La:TiO2 was reduce and capable to absorb the visible light radiation.

Effect of concentration of dye: The effect of concentration (from 25 ppm to 100 ppm) of dye was studied on the photodegradation of

dye. The photodegradation of methyl orange is given in Figure 8a. the photodegradation of methyl orange were found maximum 19% and 98.9% at 25 ppm concentration, for TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 respectively. The rate of photodegradation of Methyl Orange was found to decrease with the gradual increase in concentration. This is due to the hindrance created in the path of light by the number of dye molecules, therefore the number of photons penetrating in the dye solution is reduced, and hence catalyst surface is not received complete photons. Thus the formation of the reactive ●OH and O2

– radicals is reduced. Thus the optimum concentration of dye should be maintained in the photocatalytic reaction, where maximum efficiency of photodegradation can be found [45].

Effect of time on photocatalytic degradation of dye: In presence of TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2, the photodegradation of methyl Orange has been studied at different irradiation time. The photocatalytic degradation of methyl Orange was increased with increase of irradiation time. In case of Co:La:TiO2, The photodegradation was found 98% at 180 min irradiation of visible light but in case of pure titania only 18% photodegradation was observed. In case of blank experiment, there was no major change observed. The effect of irradiation time on photodegradation of methyl Orange is showing in Figure 8b. This is because of the dye molecule interaction with the surface of photocatalyst and the time of illumination increases, the interaction increased. Consequently the photodegradation efficiency of photocatalyst was increased [46].

Effect of pH of solution: The effect of pH (from 2 to 9) on photodegradation of methyl orange was determined. The pH of the solution was adjusting with H2SO4 and NaOH, while kept at constant amounts of photocatalyst 800 mg/ L and concentration of dye solutions (Figure 8c). The observed photodegradation was found low photodegradation rates at acidic ranges of pH. Although at pH 5 photodegradation was found maximum. This informed that less acidic situation are favourable towards the construction of the reactive intermediates that is hydroxyl radicals is extensively improved, which further help in enhancing the reaction rate. Alternatively in highly acidic conditions for the creation of reactive intermediates is comparatively less favourable and hence less spontaneous [47,48].

Effect of photocatalyst amount: The effect of photocatalyst amount has been studied by applying the different amount (100 ppm

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Visible light TiO2 Co:La:TiO2

C t/C

o

Time (min)

(a)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

0

1

2

3

4

5

6 25 ppm 50 ppm 75 ppm 100 ppm

% A

dsor

ptio

n

Time (min)

(b)

Figure 6: (a) Change in concentration under dark with TiO2, Co:La:TiO2 and in UV light (b) under dark with Co:La:TiO2 at different concentrations.

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200

0

20

40

60

80

100 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

Reaction Time (min)

% D

egra

datio

n Ef

ficie

ncy

Figure 7: % degradation of Methyl Orange with initial concentration 50 ppm (a) without photocatalyst (b) TiO2 at 30°C (c) TiO2 at 40°C (d) Co:La:TiO2 at 30°C (e) Co:La:TiO2 at 40°C.

Page 5 of 9

Citation: Azad K, Gajanan P (2017) Photodegradation of Methyl Orange in Aqueous Solution by the Visible Light Active Co:La:TiO2 Nanocomposite. Chem Sci J 8: 164. doi: 10.4172/2150-3494.1000164

Volume 8 • Issue 3 • 1000164Chem Sci J, an open access journalISSN: 2150-3494

25 50 75 1000

20

40

60

80

100 TiO2 Co:La:TiO2

% P

hoto

degr

adat

ion

Concentration of dye (ppm)

(a)

30 60 90 120 150 180

0

20

40

60

80

100 TiO2

Co:La:TiO2 Blank

Irradiation Time (min)

% P

hoto

degr

adat

ion

(b)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

102030405060708090

TiO2 Co:La:TiO2

% P

hoto

degr

adat

ion

pH of solution

(c)

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 9000

20

40

60

80

100

TiO2

Co:La:TiO2

% P

hoto

degr

adat

ion

Dose of Photocatalyst (mg/L

(d)

Figure 8: Photodegradation of Methyl Orange by recyclable photocatalyst TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2.

to 800 ppm) of the photocatalyst. The photodegradation rate was found to increase by increasing the amount of photocatalyst. It is clear from the results shown in Figure 8d, the photodegradation increased rapidly with increase of amount of Co:La:TiO2. This is due to the fact that introduction of Co2+ and La3+ into TiO2 the band gap energy decreased up to 3.0 eV which enhance the photocatalytic activity [49].

Effect of photocatalyst: It is clear from the results shown in Figure 8 that both TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 are efficient photocatalyst for the photodegradation of Methyl Orange dye. Though Co:La:TiO2 shows the good photocatalytic activity than pure TiO2 for the degradation of Methyl Orange dye. The major photodegradation of methyl orange was observed in 3 hour irradiation time, in the presence of Co:La:TiO2 [50]. This is due to the doping of La3+ and Co2+ ions in TiO2, the band gap energy decreased, due to the formation of sub-band by the La3+ and Co2+ ions. Therefore the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 was enhanced by the doping of La3+ and Co2+ into TiO2.

Recyclability of photocatalystThe photocatalyst and Methyl Orange mixture was agitated,

illuminated with visible light and after desired time, the mixture was centrifuge to remove the photocatalyst. The obtained photocatalyst was washed three times with distilled water and kept in oven for 24 h at 60°C and reused for the photodegradation of methyl orange. The photodegradation of Methyl Orange by the recyclized Photocatalyst are showing in Figure 9. The result shows that the recyclized photocatalyst efficiency is slightly decreased probably due to the loss of some active sites and decrease of collection efficiency of photon [51].

Lowering of electron-hole recombination

Photoluminescence spectra have been used to examine the mobility of the charge carriers to the surface as well as the recombination

process involved by the electron-hole pairs in semiconductor particles. PL emission results from the radiative recombination of excited electrons and holes. In other words, it is a critical necessity of a good photocatalyst to have minimum electron-hole recombination. To study the recombination of charge carriers, PL studies of synthesized materials have been undertaken. PL emission intensity is directly related to recombination of excited electrons and holes. Figure 10 shows the photoluminescence spectra of synthesized photocatalysts. In the PL spectra the intensity of TiO2 is higher than Co:La:TiO2 indicating rate of recombination of e-- h+ is higher in TiO2 than that of Co:La:TiO2. The weak PL intensity of Co:La:TiO2 may arise due to the impregnation of La3+ and Co2+ in Titania lattice, which for sub band level in band gap region of TiO2. This delays the electrons- holes recombination process and hence utilized in the redox, reaction leading to improved photocatalytic activity [52].

Hydroxyl radical formation

As hydroxyl radical performs the key role for the decomposition of the organic pollutants, it is necessary to investigate the amount of hydroxyl radicals produced by each photocatalyst. In this study terephthalic acid (TA) has been used as a probe reagent to evaluate ●OH radical present in the photoreaction pathway. Figures 11 and 12 shows the PL spectra of TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 recorded Methyl Orange solution in presence of 10-3M Terephthalic solution. OH radical attack Terephthalic, forming 2- hydroxyl terephthalic acid (TAOH) which gives a fluorescence signal at 426 nm. The fluorescent intensity is linearly related to the number of hydroxyl radicals formed by the photocatalysts. Higher the generation of hydroxyl radical, more will be yield of TAOH and hence more intense will be the fluorescence peak. The spectra show that the intensity of peak indicating in presence of Co:La:TiO2 higher generation of more number of hydroxyl radicals compared to TiO2 [53].

Page 6 of 9

Citation: Azad K, Gajanan P (2017) Photodegradation of Methyl Orange in Aqueous Solution by the Visible Light Active Co:La:TiO2 Nanocomposite. Chem Sci J 8: 164. doi: 10.4172/2150-3494.1000164

Volume 8 • Issue 3 • 1000164Chem Sci J, an open access journalISSN: 2150-3494

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1800

102030405060708090

100110

TiO2 Recyclized TiO2 Co:La:TiO2 Recyclized Co:La:TiO2

% D

egra

datio

n Ef

ficie

ncy

Irradiation Time (min)Figure 9: Photodegradation of Methyl Orange by recyclable photocatalyst TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2.

620 630 640 650 660 670 680 690 700 7100

50100150200250300350400 TiO2

Co:La:TiO2

PL In

tens

ity

Wavelength (nm)Figure 10: Photolumiscence Spectra of (a) TiO2 (b) Co:La:TiO2.

360 400 440 480 520 560 6000

4080

120160200240280320360400

TiO2 Co:La:TiO2

PL In

tens

ity (a

.u)

Wavelength (nm)Figure 11: PL spectra of photocatalysed Methyl Orange solution in presence of terephthalic acid (0.001M) (a) TiO2 (b) Co:La:TiO2.

Mechanism of photooxidation process

TiO2+ hυ → e cb+h+v [1]

Formation of superoxide radical anion

O2+e cb → O2- [2]

Neutralization of OH- group into OH by the hole

(H2O ⇔ H++OH-)ads+h+vb → ●OH+H+ [3]

It is recommended that the hydroxyl radical (●OH) and superoxide radical anions (O2

.-) are the primary oxidizing species in the photocatalytic oxidation processes [50]. These oxidative reactions would results in the degradation of the pollutants as shown in the following equations 4-5;

Oxidation of the organic pollutants via successive attack by OH radicals

R+●OH → R+H2O [4]

or by direct reaction with holes

R+h+ → R+ → CO2+H2O+NH3 [5]

Kinetic study

The pseudo-first-order rate constant (k, min-1) for the photodegradation reaction of Methyl Orange was determined through the following relation where, k can be calculated from the plot of ln(Co/Ct) against time (t), Co and Ct denote the initial concentration and reaction concentration, respectively.

ln Co/Ct=k1t [6]

In addition, the linear feature of plots of ln(Co/Ct) versus time (Figure 13) indicates that this photocatalytic degradation reactions follow the pseudo-first-order rate law [54,55]. The rate constant of the photocatalysis at 30°C is 0.04260 to 0.0234 min-1. The effect of temperature and concentration are showing in Table 3.

Thermodynamic parameter study

In this section an attempt has been made to calculate different activation parameters. For this the reaction has been studied at two different temperatures and with the help of observed rate/rate constant, the energy of activation (∆E*), specific rate constant (kr), entropy of activation (∆S*), enthalpy of activation (∆H*), free energy of activation (∆G*) and Arrhenius frequency factor (A) have been computed for different reactions (shown in Table 4) [56].

The activation parameters have been calculated with the help of following equations:

∆E*=value of slope × 2.303R

log A=Log kr (at 35°C)+Ea /2.303 RT

∆S*=2.303 R (log A-13)

∆G*=Ea-T ∆ S*

∆H*=∆G*+T ∆ S*

The calculated values of various activation parameters for different redox systems are as Table 4.

ConclusionPrepared nanocomposites of Co:La:TiO2 were characterized by

100 ppm 50 ppmk (min-1) R2 k (min-1) R2 k (min-1) R2 k (min-1) R2

Sample 30°C 40°C 30°C 40°CTiO2 0.006 0.969 0.011 0.999 0.005 0.955 0.009 0.986

Co:La:TiO2 0.008 0.988 0.015 0.998 0.007 0.990 0.012 0.998

Table 3: The effect of concentration and temperature on rate constant.

Page 7 of 9

Citation: Azad K, Gajanan P (2017) Photodegradation of Methyl Orange in Aqueous Solution by the Visible Light Active Co:La:TiO2 Nanocomposite. Chem Sci J 8: 164. doi: 10.4172/2150-3494.1000164

Volume 8 • Issue 3 • 1000164Chem Sci J, an open access journalISSN: 2150-3494

X-Ray Diffractometer, SEM, TEM, UV- Vis, FT-IR, Band gap energy and BET. The TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 were used as photocatalyst for the degradation of Methyl Orange. The particle size was estimated by the Scherrer’s calculation and found 68 and 32 nm for TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2

respectively. The surface area of the photocatalysts were found 37.52 and 106.68 m2/g for TiO2 and Co:La.TiO2 respectively. The band gap energy of TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 were 3.2 and 3.0 eV. The photodegradation of Methyl Orange has been found 98.9% at 25 ppm concentration of dye,

S. No Metal Oxide Conditions ∆DE* and ∆H* (kjmol-1) Kr (min1) × 10-3 ∆S* × 10-3 (kjmol-1K-1) ∆G* (kjmol-1) × 102

1TiO2, 30°C,

24.07 5.26 -69.765 18.23100 ppm

2TiO2, 40°C,

30.23 6.61 -69.463 27.8100 ppm

3Co:La:TiO2, 30°C,

35.33 7.72 -69.154 20.75100 ppm

4Co:La:TiO2, 40°C,

48.23 10.54 -68.535 27.42100 ppm

5TiO2, 30°C,

23.78 5.2 -69.94 20.9850 ppm

6TiO2, 40°C,

34.23 7.48 -69.217 27.6950 ppm

7Co:La:TiO2, 30°C,

33.13 7.24 -69.282 20.7850 ppm

8Co:La:TiO2, 40°C,

50.48 11.03 -68.445 27.3850 ppm

Table 4: Thermodynamic parameters for the photocatalytic degradation of Methyl Orange (MB) dye (50 ppm and 100 ppm) and TiO2 and Co:La:TiO2 (800 mg/L) under Visible light at 30°C and 40°C temperature.

Figure 12: Mechanism of free radical formation in the photocatalysis.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2000.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0

(a) (b) (c) (d)

ln C

o/C t

Time (min)

( I )

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2000.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.02.2

(a) (b) (c) (d)

ln C

o/C t

Reaction Time (min)

( II )

Figure 13: The straight line relationship between the ln (Co/Ct) and irradiation time (a) TiO2 at 30°C (b) TiO2 at 40°C (c) Co:La:TiO2 at 30°C (d) Co:La:TiO2 at 40°C for methyl orange (I) 50 ppm (II) 100 ppm.

Page 8 of 9

Citation: Azad K, Gajanan P (2017) Photodegradation of Methyl Orange in Aqueous Solution by the Visible Light Active Co:La:TiO2 Nanocomposite. Chem Sci J 8: 164. doi: 10.4172/2150-3494.1000164

Volume 8 • Issue 3 • 1000164Chem Sci J, an open access journalISSN: 2150-3494

88% at 5 pH, 96% at 800 mg/L amount of photocatalyst and 98.5% at 180 min illumination of visible light in presence of Co:La:TiO2 whereas in case of TiO2 about 20% photodegradation was observed. Hence the prepared Co:La:TiO2 nanocomposite is the efficient and superior photocatalyst than the neat TiO2. The photodegradation was following the first order kinetics.

Acknowledgements

We thanks for financial assistance to UGC, Government of India is acknowledged. The authors also acknowledge the support provided by the Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, India.

References

1. Mahmoud MA, Poncheri A, Badr Y (2009) Photocatalytic degradation of Methyl Orange dye. South African J Science 105: 299-303.

2. Sauer T, Neto GC, Jose HJ, Moreira RF (2002) Kinetics of photocatalytic degradation of reactive dyes in a TiO2 slurry reactor. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 149: 147-154.

3. Kavitha SK, Palanisamy PN (2011) Photocatalytic and sonophotocatalytic degradation of reactive red 120 using dye sensitized TiO2 under visible light. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering 3: 1-6.

4. Lee H, Park YK, Kim SJ, Kim BH, Jung SC (2015) Titanium dioxide modification with cobalt oxide nanoparticles for photocatalysis. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 32: 259-263.

5. Makwana MN, Christopher JT, Robert IG, McMillan PF (2016) Pilot plant scale continuous hydrothemal synthesis of nano- titania; effect of size on photocatalytic activity. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 42: 131-137.

6. Liu S, Jaffrezic N, Guillard C (2008) Size effects in liquid-phase photo-oxidation of phenol using nanometer-sized TiO2 catalysts. Appl Surf Sci 255: 2704-2709.

7. Gnanaprakasam A, Sivakumar VM, Sivayogavalli PL, Murugan MT (2015) Characterization of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles and their applications in photocatalytic degradation of azodyes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 121: 121-125

8. Wang DN, Tafen JP (2009) Origin of photocatalytic activity of Nitrogen-doped TiO2 nanobelts. J Am Chem Soc 131: 12290-12297.

9. Hariprasad N, Anju SG, Yesodharan EP, Suguna Y (2013) Sunlight induced removal of Rhodamine B fromwater through semiconductor photocatalysis: effects of adsorption, reaction conditions and additives. Research Journal of Material Science 1: 19-17.

10. Zhang Z, Brown Z, Goodall JBM, Weng X, Thompson K, et al. (2009) Direct continuous hydrothermal synthesis of high surface area nanosized titania. J Alloys and Compounds 476: 451-456

11. Kumar SG, Devi LG (2011) Review on Modified TiO2 Photocatalysis under UV/Visible Light: Selected Results and Related Mechanisms on Interfacial Charge Carrier Transfer Dynamics. J Phys Chem A 115: 13211-13241

12. Jia H, Zheng Z, Zhao H, Zhang L, Zou Z (2009) Non aqueous sol–gel synthesis and growth mechanism of single crystalline TiO2 nanorods with high photocatalytic activity. Materials Research Bulletin 44: 1312-1316.

13. Silva CG, Wang W, Faria JL (2006) Photocatalytic and photochemical degradation of mono-, di- and tri-azo dyes in aqueous solution under UV irradiation. J Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 181: 314-324.

14. Epling AG, Lin C (2002) Photoassisted bleaching of dyes utilizing TiO2 and visible light. Chemosphere 46: 561-570.

15. Sökmen M, Özkan A (2002) Decolourising textile wastewater with modified Titania: the effects of inorganic anions on the photocatalysis. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 147: 77-81.

16. Badr Y, Abd El-Wahed MG, Mahmoud MA (2008) Photocatalytic degradation of Methyl Orange dye by silica nanoparticles. J Hazardous Materials 154: 245-253.

17. Akyol A, Bayramoglu M (2008) The degradation of an azo dye in a batch slurry photocatalytic reactor. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 47: 2150-2156.

18. Gupta AK, Pal A, Sahoo C (2006) Photocatalytic degradation of a mixture of Crystal Violet (Basic Violet 3) and Methyl Orange dye in aqueous suspensions using Ag+ doped TiO2. Dyes and Pigments 69: 224-232.

19. Zakarya SA, Kassim A, Lim HN, Anwar NS (2010) Synthesis of titanium dioxide microstructures via sucrose ester microemulsion-mediated hydrothermal method. Sains Malaysiana 39: 975-979.

20. Rohit B, Madhulika S, Bahadur D (2013) Visible light-driven nanocomposites (BiVO4/CuCr2O4) for efficient degradation of organic dye. Dalton Trans 42: 6736-6744.

21. Selvam K, Muruganandham M, Muthuvel I, Swaminathan M (2007) The influence of inorganic oxidants and metal ions on semiconductor sensitized photodegradation of 4-fluorophenol. J Chem Eng 128: 51-57.

22. Ufana R, Ashraf SM (2011) Semi-conducting poly (1-naphthylamine) nanotubes: a pH independent adsorbent of sulphonate dyes. Chem Eng J 174: 546-555.

23. Zhao D, Sheng G, Chen C, Wang X (2012) Enhanced photocatalytic degradation in methylene Orange under visible irradiation on grapheme@TiO2 dyade structure. Appl Catal B: Environ 111: 303-308.

24. Tanaka K, Padermpole K, Hisanaga T (2000) Photocatalytic degradation of commercial azo dyes. Wat Res 34: 327-333.

25. Zhu Y, Xu S, Yi D (2010) Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange using polythiophene/ titanium dioxide composites. Reactive & Functional Polymers 70: 282-287.

26. Tang WZ, An H (1995) UV/TiO2 photocatalytic oxidation of commercial dyes in aqueous solution. Chemosphere 31: 4171-4183.

27. Wang X, Chen G, Zhang J (2013) Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Cu2O/PANI Composite Photocatalysts with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity and Stability. Catal Commun 31: 57-61.

28. Cullity BD, Stock SR (2001) Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, Third Edition, and New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Newyork.

29. Zhao J, Chen C, Ma W (2005) Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants under visible light irradiation. Topics in Catalysis. 35: 269-278.

30. Wang DS, Zhang J, Luo QZ, Li XY, Duan YD (2009) Characterization and photocatalytic activity of poly(3-hexylthiophene)-modifiedTiO2 for degradation of methyl orange under visible light. J Hazard Mater 169: 546-550.

31. Salem MA, Al-Ghonemiy AF, Zaki AB (2009) Photocatalytic degradation of Allura red and Quinoline yellow with Polyaniline/TiO2 Nanocomposite. Appl Catal B: Environ 91: 59-66

32. Reddy KM, Manorama SV, Reddy AR (2002) Bandgap studies on anatase titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Materials Chemistry and Physics 78: 239-245.

33. Langmuir I (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc 40: 1361-1403.

34. Nomanbhay SM, Palanisamy K (2004) Removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater using chitosan coated oil palm shell charcoal. Electron J Biotechnol 8: 43-53.

35. Mahmood T, Din SU, Naeem A, Mustafa S, Waseem M, et al. (2012) Adsorption of arsenate from aqueous solution on binary mixed oxide of iron and silicon. Chem Eng J 192: 90-98.

36. Gong R, Zhu S, Zhang D, Chen J, Ni S, et al. (2008) Adsorption behavior of cationic dyes on citric acid esterifying wheat straw: kinetic and thermodynamic profile. Desalination 230: 220-228.

37. Goel NK, Kumar V, Misra N, Varshney L (2015) Cellulose based cationic adsorbent fabricated via radiation grafting process for treatment of dyes waste water. Carbohydrate Polymers 132: 444-451.

38. Wijannarong S, Aroonsrimorakot S, Thavipoke P, Kumsopa C, Sangjan S (2013) Removal of Reactive Dyes from Textile Dyeing Industrial Effluent by Ozonation Process. APCBEE Procedia 5: 279-282.

39. Gu L, Wang J, Qi R, Wang X, Xu P, et al. (2012) A novel incorporating style of polyaniline/TiO2 composites as effective visible Photocatalysts. J Molec Catal A: Chem. 357: 19-25.

40. Vinodopal K, Wynkoop DE, Kamate PV (1996) Environmental photochemistry on semiconductor surfaces: photosensitized degradation of a textile azo dye, Acid Orange 7, on TiO2 particles using visible light. Environ Sci Technol 30: 1660.

41. Saquib M, Muneer M (2003) TiO2 photocatalytic degradation of a triphenyl methane dye (gentian violet), in aqueous suspensions. Dyes and Pigments 56: 37.

Page 9 of 9

Citation: Azad K, Gajanan P (2017) Photodegradation of Methyl Orange in Aqueous Solution by the Visible Light Active Co:La:TiO2 Nanocomposite. Chem Sci J 8: 164. doi: 10.4172/2150-3494.1000164

Volume 8 • Issue 3 • 1000164Chem Sci J, an open access journalISSN: 2150-3494

42. Tanaka K, Padermpole K, Hisanaga T (2000) Photocatalytic degradation ofcommercial azo dyes. Water Res 34: 327.

43. Hu C, Yu JC, Hao Z, Wong PK (2003) Effect of acidity and inorganic ionson the photocatalytic degradation of different azo dyes. Applied catalysis B:Environmental 46: 35.

44. Konstantinou IK, Albanis TA (2004) TiO2 assisted photocatalytic degradationof azo dyes in aqueous solution:kinetic and mechanistic investigations. Applied catalysis B: Environmental 49: 1-14.

45. Wang B, Wu F, Li P, Deng N (2007) UV-light induced photodegradation of bisphenolin water: kinetics and influencing factors. React kinet catal Lett 92: 3-9.

46. Neamtu M, Siminiceanu I, Yediber A, Kettrup A (2002) Kinetics of decolorization and mineralization of reactive azo dyes in aqueous solution by UV/H2O2oxidation. Dyes and Pigments 53: 93-99.

47. Baran E, Yazici B (2016) Effect of different nano-structured Ag doped TiO2-NTs fabricated by electrodeposition on the electrocatalytic hydrogen production.International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41: 2498-2511.

48. Sun Q, Xu Y (2009) Sensitization of TiO2 with Aluminum Phthalocyanine:Factors Influencing the Efficiency for Chlorophenol Degradation in Water under Visible Light. J Phys Chem C 113: 12387-12394.

49. Wang S (2008) A comparative study of Fenton and Fenton-like reaction kinetics in decolourization of wastewater. Dyes and Pigments 76: 714-720.

50. Guettaı N, Amar HA (2005) Photocatalytic oxidation of methyl orange in presence of titanium dioxide in aqueous suspension. Part II: Kinetics study.Desalination 185: 439-448.

51. Chen D, Ray AK (1999) Photocatalytic kinetics of phenol and its derivativesover UV irradiated TiO2. Appl Catal B: Environ 23: 143-157.

52. Gupta VK, Jain R, Siddiqui MN, Saleh TA, Agarwal S, et al. (2010) Equilibriumand thermodynamic studies on the adsorption of the dye Rhodamine-B ontomustard cake and activated carbon. J Chem Eng Data 55: 5225-5229.

53. Pradhan GK, Padhi D, Parida K (2013) Fabrication of α-Fe2O3 Nanorod/RGO composite: A novel hybrid photocatalyst for phenol degradation. Appl MaterInterfaces 5: 9101-9110

54. Vinuth M, Naik HSB, Vinoda BM, Pradeepa SM, Arun KG, et al. (2016) RapidRemoval of Hazardous Rose Bengal Dye Using Fe(III)–Montmorillonite as anEffective Adsorbent in Aqueous Solution. J Environ Anal Toxicol 6: 355.

55. Chen D, Ray AK (1998) Photodegradation kinetics of 4-nitrophenol in TiO2suspension. Water research 32: 3223-3234.

56. Galvan D, Orives JR, Coppo RL, Silva ET, Angilelli KG, et al. (2013)Determination of the Kinetics and Thermodynamics Parameters of BiodieselOxidation Reaction Obtained from an Optimized Mixture of Vegetable Oil andAnimal Fat. Energy Fuels 27: 6866-6871.