c 2009 Paola Rodr¶‡guez - University of...
Transcript of c 2009 Paola Rodr¶‡guez - University of...
HIGH VELOCITY OUTFLOWS IN QUASARS
By
PAOLA RODRIGUEZ
A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOLOF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OFDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
2009
1
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I was told long time ago that “es de buen nacido ser agradecido”. Como mi madre me
educo muy bien, no puedo evitar intentar incluir a todos aquellos que me han ayudado y
que son parte importante de esta tesis. I am happy to say that I could not have done this
without the help of many great people that I have had the pleasure and luck of meeting
during these last six years. I hope my memory does not fail me here. To start, I would
like to thank Ramon Garcıa Lopez, because without his encouragement and help I would
have not applied to the UF Alumni Fellowship and become the first Spanish graduate
student in the UF-IAC exchange program. Once I arrived, Rafael Guzman and who later
became my adviser, Fred Hamann, were an incredible help to make the transition easier.
For all her help, for always being there, and for being a super mom to all the international
kids, I would like to thank Debra Anderson and everybody I met at the UF International
Center. All of you are amazing! Those first moments in Gainesville were not easy . . .
and as the song says, I would not have done it without (more than) a little help from
my friends, and especially I would like to thank Ana, Eric, Ily, Katherine, Bruno, Pimol,
Alister and Balsa for making it much more fun. Margaret: thank you so much for your
friendship, for being always “my rock”, for all the drinks and the laughs. Those parties
were always crazy and Sundays would not have been so bright without brunch! I would
like to thank Ashley for being herself all the time, for the laughs, the help and the jacket!
I am going to randomly ask people in my future office to start screaming when I miss
you, Sun. Thanks go to her and Audra for all those night outs and talks. I would like to
thank my partners in crime, Leah, Dan C. and Dan B. for being an amazing group (and
a great release when I needed to complain about my adviser). I would like to thank my
roommate, one of my best friends, and my partner in ball games at 2am in the third floor
corridor, Curtis, for always being there and for his never ending kindness. I would like to
thank Suvrath and Maren for all the advice and Julian for being such a good person (and
not forcing me to try marmite ever again!). A mi hermanito Miguel solo le puedo decir
4
“feo, gracias por todo!! que la distancia solo nos mantenga mas cerca”. A toda la “Spanish
troupe” (Nestor, Jorge, Izaskun y Enrique) por esas comidas de 5 horas y por las risas
(al final, Izaskun nunca aparco el coche delante de mi casita del downtown . . .). Dave
and Knicole arrived at the end to make my last year hilarious and much more difficult
to leave . . . Keep on rocking! I also have an American brother, Justin: thank you so
much for being a companion until the early hours of the morning and for all those laughs
(although I still want to kill you for not telling me Amy was pregnant until her 6th month
of pregnancy . . .). Thanks go to Dimitri for the late night talks, for the cookies and for
the all the reading (you are amazing). To Elizabeth, my wonderful girlfriend, for being the
least complicated relationship I have ever been into. I wish you all had arrived earlier! To
Nancy, for accepting the mess I had made in my office and to her and PC for being my
officemates when nobody else was there. To all my other officemates during these years
for accepting me whenever I was stressed and for laughing while working. Thanks go to
Craig (Go Gators!) for being such an IDL machine and for all the beer . . . I would also
like to thank Anthony Gonzalez for letting me annoy him every time I wanted, for all
his advice and for the use of his laptop when mine crashed two months before I finished
my dissertation. I especially remembered what he said when I got offered a post-doctoral
position and it was official that I was leaving “Oh wow, it seems like yesterday when you
arrived and complained about everything . . .” I would like to thank those who became
my other American family, Ben and Leah, and very especially Joanne, for their friendship
and encouragement. Also, my thanks go to all the wonderful professors that have taught
me so much about this wonderful world of physics and astronomy, and to Catherine
for keeping me updated with what I had to do, especially when I had lost control of
everything . . . And finally to the friends I found at the very end of my experience in
Gainesville: all the latin crowd, and especially Cynna and Leila, let’s toast for the shared
moments we will have in the future!
5
Sin embargo, mi aventura empezo mucho antes. Me gustarıa dar las gracias a mis
profesores Nestor Rodrıguez e Irene Puerto por ser una inspiracion para mi, por despertar
mi espıritu crıtico y mi amor por la fısica. Tambien me gustarıa dar las gracias a mis
amigos de casa y a los que ya estan repartidos por el mundo. A mi mejor amiga, Noa,
por todas esas llamadas y mailes cuando la desesperacion de estar tan lejos se hacıa
insoportable y por mantener el cordon unido para que pareciera que nunca me habıa ido
del todo, gracias de todo corazon. A ella y a Carlos, Rocıo, Marta, Gema, Bea y Ana por
las risas y por compartir los cambios en nuestras vidas aunque estuvieramos lejos, por las
comidas paralelas, por esas tarjetas manufacturadas estupendas, y por esas celebraciones
conjuntas que nos echamos, sois los mejores amigos que podrıa tener. A Eduardo, por
convertirse en una de las personas mas importantes en mi vida y nunca dejar de serlo.
Aunque seguimos sin encontrarnos a este o al otro lado del charco, siempre espero verte
pronto! La antesala de esta tesis, mis dos anos en Canarias, ya me presento un monton
de gente estupenda que afortunadamente continua en mi vida. Raquel, gracias por ser la
mejor companera de aventuras en la distancia. No se que habrıa hecho sin nuestras charlas
diarias. Gracias a Susi, Vane, Merche, Ana, David, Panete, y en especial a Carlos, por
todas esas risas ciberneticas que han hecho, y hacen, que los dıas de trabajo sean mucho
mas amenos (y sigo pensando sin embargo que Notting Hill es una basura . . .!!) Gracias a
todos ellos he aprendido que la distancia es, en verdad, relativa.
I would like to thank my committee, Stephen Eikenberry, James Fry, Vicki Sarajedini
and Jonathan Tan, and especially Michael Crenshaw, for their endless patience, their
multiple comments and questions. Without any doubt, the maximum contributor to make
this dissertation possible is my adviser, Fred Hamann. Fred, I would like to thank you
for so many things I would need another whole acknowledgements section just for it. You
have taught me everything I know about quasar outflows, and have been a mentor and
a friend. You are also one of the people I respect more in this field. I also would like to
thank you for all the good (and not so good) shared moments, because life happens while
6
you are working on and writing the dissertation . . . Thank you so much for everything,
from the beginning, when my English was so bad we needed to play pictionary to be
able to have a meeting, to the last moments, when we would help each other in the panic
crises. Also, I would like to thank you (really!) for your many, many, (many!) comments.
I am sure I will know when you are the referee of one of my papers . . . And just so you
know, leaving your office for the very last time as one of your graduate students was a very
emotional moment.
Fortunately, people in my field are very cool, choose very cool places to have
workshops, and I have had the pleasure of meeting many of them. I would like to thank
Michael Crenshaw, George Chartas, Doron Chelouche, Michael Eracleous, Paul Green,
Jason X. Prochaska, and Daniel Proga, Joe Shields for many helpful discussions and
becoming collaborators. I would also like to thank the support of the KPNO and MDM
observatories scientists and staff. In particular, I would like to send our thanks to John
Thorsten, Steven Magee, and Robert Barr for solving the mystery of the “rare gas”
spectral lines at the MDM observatory, and Doug Williams, Hal Haldebel, Jin Hutchinson,
Karen Butler, Dianne Harmer, Gene McDougall, and Kristin Reetz especially, for their
help during telescope “crises” at the 2.1 m. And many thanks go to my future boss, Jane
Charlton, for waiting for me all these last months that took to finish my dissertation.
De vuelta en casa, gracias a toda mi familia, por aun sin entender que me pasara el
tiempo “mirando estrellitas” nunca dejaron de darme su amor y apoyo desde la distancia,
y en especial a mis “papis”: Arturo, Anıbal y Luis, por ejercer de figura paterna, cada
uno a su estilo y a su forma. Gracias por esas multitudinarias comidas organizadas en
el ultimo momento, por esas charlas acerca de la vida, de la ciencia y lo que la carrera
significaba y por los constantes chequeos para ver que seguıa bien y con los pies en el
suelo. A mi abuela Elisa que se fue mientras empezaba esta tesis pero sigue presente, y a
mi abuela Amelia, por que podamos compartir muchos mas momentos.
7
Y gracias a Alejandro (Ale! Ale! Ale!), porque despues de haber cruzado el charco
tantas veces hay momentos que una ya no sabe de donde es, y por fin encontre “casa”
cuando te conocı. Gracias por tener siempre la mirada perfecta y la palabra precisa. Soy
la mas afortunada (the luckiest) por recibir ese amor tan bonito que llego cuando menos
me lo esperaba. Gracias por esa felicidad contagiosa que me das, que provoca la carcajada
diaria, y por bancarme cuando la pierdo. Te amo guachi!!
Y por supuesto, a mi mami, porque sin ti no estarıa aquı. Gracias por poner mi
educacion por delante de todo y por tu guıa constante, y especialmente por tu apoyo
incondicional cuando me iba cada vez mas lejos. Estamos tan lejos y tan cerca a la vez, no
crees? Gracias por ser la mejor mami del mundo. Con cuatro anos te decıa que te querıa
de aquı a la luna (ida y vuelta, no te vayas a creer . . .) Despues aprendı que te querıa de
aquı a Pluton (ya no es un planeta, vale, pero la distancia es la misma.) Con el tiempo
he aprendido no solo que el universo era mucho mas grande y que se expande, sino que el
amor que se tiene por una madre es mucho mas grande tambien y crece en la distancia y
hoy puedo decir: “Mami, te quiero de aquı a los quasares!!!”
8
TABLE OF CONTENTS
page
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1.1 Quasars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161.2 Quasar Outflows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181.3 Variability of Outflows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221.4 Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2 HIGH VELOCITY OUTFLOW IN QUASAR PG0935+417 . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252.2 Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262.3 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
2.3.1 Line Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282.3.2 Continuum Normalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302.3.3 Line Measurements and Physical Quantities . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
2.4 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392.4.1 Ionization and Total Column Density of the Outflow . . . . . . . . . 392.4.2 Nature of the Absorber, Variability and Kinematics . . . . . . . . . 412.4.3 Origin of the Outflow, Timescales and Causes for Variability . . . . 43
2.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
3 AN INVENTORY OF C IV MINI-BALS AND OUTFLOW LINES IN SDSSQUASARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483.2 Quasar Sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493.3 Identification and Measurements of C iv Absorption Lines . . . . . . . . . 503.4 Mini-BALs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 593.5 Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
3.5.1 Statistics of Mini-BALs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 663.5.2 Relation between Mini-BALs and BALs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 713.5.3 Relation between Mini-BALs and AALs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 743.5.4 Relation between C iv Mini-BALs and Mg ii Absorption . . . . . . 773.5.5 Relation between C iv Mini-BALs and Radio Properties . . . . . . . 79
9
3.6 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823.7 Summary and Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
4 VARIABILITY IN QUASAR OUTFLOWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934.2 Sample Selection and Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934.3 Data Reduction and Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 944.4 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
4.4.1 Characterizing the Variability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1144.4.2 Variability Fractions and Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1154.4.3 Comparisons to Previous Work on BALs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
4.5 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1244.5.1 Summary of Main Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1244.5.2 Physical Properties of the Absorbers and Variability Causes . . . . . 124
4.5.2.1 Change of the ionization state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1254.5.2.2 Motion of the absorber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
APPENDIX: ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
A.1 J083104+532500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131A.2 J092849+504930 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131A.3 J093857+412821 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132A.4 J102907+651024 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132A.5 J103859+484049 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132A.6 J144105+045454 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133A.7 J163651+313147 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
10
LIST OF TABLES
Table page
2-1 Observation logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2-2 Results of the profile fitting of C iv, Nv, and Ovi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
2-3 Upper limits on lines not detected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3-1 List of mini-BALs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
3-2 List of BALs from SDSS that were not fit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
3-3 Number x 100 of mini-BALs per quasar. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
3-4 Fractions of quasars with mini-BALs (700<FWHM<3000 km s−1). . . . . . . . 70
3-5 Numbers of AALQSOs and non-AALQSOs that include a mini-BAL . . . . . . . 76
4-1 Journal of observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
4-2 Absorption lines properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
11
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure page
2-1 Optical spectrum obtained at Lick observatory in 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2-2 Ultraviolet spectrum from the HST archive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2-3 HST normalized spectra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
2-4 Normalization of the Lick 1996 spectrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
2-5 Normalization of the HST spectrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
2-6 Line fitting to C iv in the 1996 Lick spectrum, Ovi and Nv . . . . . . . . . . . 36
2-7 Upper limits to absorption lines for C iii, N iii, and Pv . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
2-8 Variability in the high velocity C iv λλ1548,1551 feature over a period of tenyears . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
3-1 Distribution of all the absorption systems measured in FWHM-velocity space . . 53
3-2 Examples of different fits and their comment-codes in Table 3-1 . . . . . . . . . 55
3-3 Examples of mini-BALs in quasars with BI=0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
3-4 Examples of mini-BALs in quasars with BI>0 km s−1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
3-5 Distribution of FWHM vs REWλ1548 of the part of the FWHM–REW space ofthe C iv absorption lines measured . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
3-6 Distribution in FWHM of the C iv absorption lines measured with FWHM≥700 km s−1 in intervals of 500 km s−1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
3-7 Number of mini-BALs (700<FWHM<3000 km s−1) per quasar in velocity space 67
3-8 Number of mini-BALs with 600<FWHM<3000 km s−1, 900<FWHM<3000 kms−1, and 700<FWHM<2000 km s−1, per quasar in velocity space . . . . . . . . 68
3-9 Fractions of quasars with at least one mini-BAL outflowing at velocity ”< v”and at a velocity from 25000 km s−1 to v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
3-10 Percentages of quasars with at least one mini-BAL outflowing at velocities upto v = 25000 km s−1 or from v > 25000 to 60000 km s−1 and quasars with BIsin different ranges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
3-11 Percentages of absorption lines with FWHM>3000 km s−1 per quasar per 5000km s−1 bin in velocity space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
3-12 Number of mini-BALs outflowing at v > 5000 km s−1 per AALQSO and pernon-AALQSO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
12
3-13 Examples of Mg ii outflowing with C iv . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
3-14 FWHM–velocity–(radio properties) space of C iv absorption lines with 500 <FWHM < 5000 km/s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
3-15 Radio loudness versus Balnicity Index of the quasars with absorption in Figure3-14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
4-1 SDSS spectra plotted over KPNO or MDM spectra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
4-2 Fractional change of REW as a function of ∆t (in the quasars’ restframe) of themini-BALs and marginal NALs targeted in this study (Table 4-2). . . . . . . . . 116
4-3 Distribution of absorption features in FWHM (black) and the number of themthat varied (red/filled) in 250 km s−1 bins. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116
4-4 Distribution of absorption features in depth (black) and the number of themthat varied (red/filled) in 0.05 bins. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
4-5 Distribution of absorption features in velocity (black) and the number of themthat varied (red/filled) in 5000 km s−1 bins. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
4-6 Fractional change of REW versus average REW of all the absorption lines inour sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
4-7 Fractional change of REW versus depth of all the absorption lines in our sample 120
4-8 Fractional change of REW distribution with velocity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
4-9 Change in the (depth) - (velocity width at the continuum level) space of theabsorption. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
4-10 Change in (depth) - (velocity) space of the absorption. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
A-1 Normalized SDSS spectra (black) and KPNO spectra (red/grey) . . . . . . . . . 133
13
Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Schoolof the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of theRequirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
HIGH VELOCITY OUTFLOWS IN QUASARS
By
Paola Rodrıguez
May 2009
Chair: Fred HamannMajor: Astronomy
Outflows are a fundamental part of quasars: they bring first-hand physical information
about the quasar environments, they are common (and maybe ubiquitous) and they might
be key to connecting the AGN with their host galaxies.
Nonetheless, many aspects of these outflows are poorly understood. For example,
we still do not understand the acceleration mechanisms that drive the flows off of the
accretion disks to speeds reaching 0.1c – 0.2c. I present new measurements and analyses
of one of the most extreme cases: the high velocity outflow (v ≈ 51000 km s−1 ) observed
in the spectra of PG0935+417 (zem ≈ 1.97). We use a combination of ground-based
(Lick observatory and Sloan Digital Sky Survey - SDSS) and space-based (Hubble Space
Telescope) spectra to measure the absorption in C iv λ1549 and, for the first time, Ovi
λ1034 and Nv λ1240 in the same outflow. The absence of lower ionization lines indicates
that the flow is highly ionized with an ionization parameter of log U ≈ -1.1. The resolved
Ovi indicates that the lines are moderetely saturated with the absorber covering just
∼80% of the background emission source. We estimate the total column density to be
NH ∼> 3.0 x 1019 cm−2, which is small enough to be compatible with radiation pressure
mechanisms accelerating this outflow.
I also contribute to the study of outflows by surveying a realm of parameter space
that has been sparsely studied before: mini-broad absorption lines (mini-BALs) and
high velocities (v ∼> 10000 km s−1). My goals are to 1) quantitatively define the range of
14
outflow lines in quasar spectra, 2) examine their detection frequencies and distributions
in velocity, strength and FWHM, 3) look for relationships between the various absorption
line types and basic quasar properties, and 4) identify individual outflow lines candidates
for follow-up studies. To do so, I compile a comprehensive catalog of C iv absorption lines
in the ∼ 2200 brightest SDSS quasars at 1.8≤ z ≤3.5, and select those with FWHM >
700 km s−1 to be unlikely due to intervening material. I obtain a fraction of quasars with
mini-BALs of 11.4%±0.9%. Although the mini-BAL phenomenon is strongly related to the
more previously studied Broad Absorption Lines (BALs) present in BALQSOs, I still find
mini-BALs in 5.1%±0.7% of non-BALQSOs. I find no correlation between the presence of
associated absorbers or radio loudness and the occurance of mini-BALs. By adding results
from other outflow studies, I estimate a total percentage of quasars with outflows to be ∼>41 - 77%.
Finally, in order to characterize better the structural and physical properties of
these outflows, I carried out a monitoring program over a range of ∆t = 0.9 - 3.3 years
in the quasar rest frame by using facilities at the Kitt Peak National Observatory and
MDM Observatory. By comparing our new spectra with archival spectra (SDSS), I find
that ∼ 50% of quasars with mini-BAL and BALs at high velocity varied between just
two observations. I find that variability sometimes occurs in complex ways; however,
all the variable lines vary in intensity and not in velocity. Thus I find no evidence for
acceleration/deceleration in the outflow. I also do not find any correlations between the
variability and Rest Equivalent Width (REW), Full Width Half Minumum (FWHM) or
depth of the absorption feature, except for the fact that none of the narrower systems
varied. A significant fraction of the non-variable narrower systems are probably unrelated
to quasar outflows.
15
CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION
1.1 Quasars
Only a century ago, a large fraction of the astronomy community believed that the
universe did not extend beyond our galaxy, the Milky Way, and that the many observed
“spiral nebulae” belonged to it. In the 1920s, Edwin Hubble introduced the notion that
these spiral nebula were in fact other galaxies, like our own, located much farther away
(Hubble 1926). Based on spectroscopic observations of many spiral nebulae taken by Vesto
Slipher (Slipher 1915), who reported larger redshifts (z) than expected for most of them,
Hubble proposed his famous law, which states that the redshift in the light coming from
what, nowadays, are agreed to be distant galaxies is proportional to their distance. Their
relatively similar brightness to closer objects is a consequence of their large luminosities
and their distances. Nowadays, some of the most luminous and most distant objects in the
universe are known as “Quasars”.
The term “Quasar” was introduced by astrophysicist Hong-Yee Chiu in 1964, as
a shorter version of the commonly used term ‘quasi-stellar radio sources’, since they
were discovered by their radio brightness. Many of these sources were compiled in the
third Cambridge Catalogs 3C and 3CR (Edge et al. 1959; Bennett 1962), and their
nature was a mystery at that time. While being the brightest radio sources in the sky,
interferometry studies discovered that these sources, with counterparts of star-like
appearance on optical photographs, had very small angular sizes (less than 1 arcsec),
invoking very high temperatures (∼ 107 K), and thus non-thermal radiation. Also, the
optical counterparts were abnormally blue in the ultraviolet and showed large variability
(for example, 3C 48 showed a variation of 0.4 mag over 1 year - Matthews & Sandage
1963). The spectra of these sources were also anomalous relative to typical stars, whose
spectra are a combination of a thermal (blackbody) continuum and a superposition of
many absorption lines. Instead, quasar spectra contained a non-thermal continuum with
16
many unidentified broad emission lines. It was not until the 1960s that Schmidt (1963)
and Oke (1963), using observations of the optical counterpart of 3C 273, which were
obtained at the 200-inch Hale Telescope on Mount Palomar (Hazard et al. 1963), realized
that these ”strange elements” were actually spectral lines of the Balmer series of hydrogen
redshifted by 0.158. This redshift was among the largest measured to date. Soon, several
groups at different observatories (Palomar, Kitt Peak, Lick, and Keck) discovered more
counterparts of these radio sources. Today, we know that not all quasars are bright in
radio wavelengths and the redshift range of quasars has expanded to z ≈ 6 (Fan et al.
2001).
Quasars are the brightest end (at visible wavelengths, luminosities ≈ 1044 - 1048
L¯) of a more general class of objects called Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN), in contrast
to non-active or normal galaxies (such as the the Milky Way). In fact, the term AGN
refers to ‘the existence of energetic phenomena in the nuclei, or central regions, of galaxies
which cannot be attributed clearly and directly to star’ (Peterson 1997). AGN are
compact objects that reside in the central regions of galaxies. As it was soon suggested by
Zel’Dovich & Novikov (1964), the only way to reconcile such great energy outputs with
small angular sizes is by invoking the existence of a super-massive black hole (SMBH)
located in the center of these powerful engines and surrounded by an accretion disk
of material spiraling inward which is fueling the quasar. Energy is produced when the
gravitational infall of this material causes it to heat to high temperatures in a dissipative
accretion disk. This accretion disk is believed to generate most of the continuum energy.
However, part of the material abandons the disk and it is expelled outside of the inner
region, sometimes at very high velocities (up to 0.2 the speed of light). This material is
commonly known as “outflows” in contrast to the relativistic jets that are observed in
radio emission.
17
1.2 Quasar Outflows
Outflows are fundamental constituents of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN). First, they
are commonly detected. Absorption lines that are blue-shifted with respect to the host
galaxy identify ejected matter and have been detected so far in at least 30% to 40% of
(optically selected) quasars and approximately 50% of Seyfert 1 galaxies (e.g., Crenshaw
et al. 1999; Reichard et al. 2003; Hamann & Sabra 2004; Trump et al. 2006; Nestor et al.
2008; Dunn et al. 2008; Ganguly & Brotherton 2008). Moreover, the outflows themselves
might be ubiquitous in AGN if, as expected, the absorbing gas subtends only part of
the sky as seen from the central continuum source. There are possible physical reasons
why outflows might, in fact, be always present. For example, the correlation between the
black hole masses (MBH) and the masses of the host galaxies (Mbulge - Gebhardt et al.
2000; Merritt & Ferrarese 2001) implies a connection between the inner AGN and its
surrounding host galaxy. This co-evolution between the SMBHs and their host galaxies
could be partly explained due to the “cosmological feedback” provided by outflows.
This AGN “feedback” could also be responsible for other observable properties of galaxy
formation (Elvis 2006), such as limiting the upper mass of galaxies (Croton et al. 2005)
whose growth cannot be stunted by reduced cooling and supernovae feedback (Thoul
& Weinberg 1995). The AGN feedback could also regulate star formation in the host
galaxies (Silk & Rees 1998; Di Matteo et al. 2005), and distribute metal rich gas to the
intergalactic medium. Also, outflows might be necessary for super-massive black hole
(SMBH) growth because, in order to preserve the conservation of angular momentum, the
accretion process fueling the AGN might require a counterpart of expelled material.
Outflows are observed as absorption lines in quasar spectra, predominantly due to
the resonance lines C iv λλ1548, 1550, Si iv λλ1394, 1403, Nv λλ1239, 1243 and Mg ii
λλ2796, 2803 in the UV/optical wavelength range. Broad Absorption Lines (BALs), which
show typical widths of several thousands of km s−1, are one of the most commonly studied
classes of quasar outflow lines (Weymann et al. 1981; Turnshek 1984; Weymann et al.
18
1991; Reichard et al. 2003; Trump et al. 2006). However, not every quasar absorption
line identifies ejected material. Narrow Absorption Lines (NALs; i.e., Foltz et al. 1986;
Aldcroft et al. 1994; Vestergaard 2003), with widths less than a few hundred km s−1, have,
on the contrary, several possible origins. Quasar light can intercept intergalactic material
not physically related to the quasars, producing narrow absorption that is denoted
”intervening”. However, some of the NALs that lie within 5000 km s−1 of the emission
redshift (called Associated Absorption Lines, or AALs - Weymann et al. 1979; Foltz et al.
1986; Anderson et al. 1987) are likely to be inherent to the quasar or its surrounding host
galaxy. This can be inferred from their larger frequencies per unit velocity as the velocity
offset between the quasar and the absorption system decreases (Weymann et al. 1979;
Nestor et al. 2008). Also, some NALs appearing at redshifts much lower than the systemic
emission redshift (zabs ¿ zem) have been found to lie close to the quasar/host galaxy and
are therefore outflowing at high velocities (Misawa et al. 2007a). Absorption lines with
intermediate widths, called ”mini-BALs”, have been found at a variety of velocities but
only in a handful of quasars to date (i.e., Turnshek 1988; Jannuzi et al. 1996; Hamann
et al. 1997c; Churchill et al. 1999; Yuan et al. 2002; Narayanan et al. 2004; Misawa et al.
2007b). Most mini-BALs are believed to be outflows because they show some of the
typical outflow signatures, such as variability (Narayanan et al. 2004; Misawa et al. 2007b)
and“smoot” profiles at high resolution, which suggests that they are not blends of many
NALs (Barlow & Sargent 1997; Hamann et al. 1997b). The study of outflows thus requires
including the three absorption lines that represent ejected material: BALs, mini-BALs and
outflowing NALs.
Whether these outflows, which are observed as different types of absorption lines,
are a different manifestation of the same physical process or a completely different
phenomenon remains unknown. As unification theories dictate, the geometry and flow
structure of these outflows might be directly related to their observed frequency. Although
several geometrical models have been proposed (e.g., Elvis 2000; Ganguly et al. 2001), so
19
far the diversity of quasar outflows and the lack of a complete account of the frequency
of every different outflow class have made this task quite difficult and have resulted in
disparities between these models. For example, in the Elvis (2000) model, NALs are the
observation of the same streams that produce the BALs but viewed at inclination angles
closer to the accretion disk plane, thus intersecting a narrower portion of the outflowing
stream. In the Ganguly et al. (2001) picture, NALs are clumps of gas viewed at smaller
inclination angles than BAL quasars (nearer the disk’s polar axis).
Another aspect that remains unsettled is what acceleration mechanism(s) is/are
driving these outflows. Several mechanisms and dynamical models have been proposed
to explain their origin and how they are ejected from the inner quasar region: radiation
pressure alone (Arav et al. 1994; Murray et al. 1995; Proga et al. 2000) or combined
with magnetic forces (de Kool & Begelman 1995; Everett 2005; Proga & Kallman 2004).
Summaries of the dynamical models are given by de Kool (1997) and Crenshaw et al.
(2003). Radiation pressure seems to play an important role as it explains the observed
relation between the AGN luminosity and the terminal velocity of the outflow (Laor &
Brandt 2002). However, outflows with large mass loss rates, large ionization parameters,
and/or high velocities can pose problems for radiative acceleration (Hamann & Sabra
2004; Crenshaw & Kraemer 2007). In any case, better characterization of every outflow
type is needed in order to develop a coherent picture.
Broad absorption lines have been studied in a systematic manner. Previous surveys of
broad absorption in quasars (e.g., Reichard et al. 2003; Trump et al. 2006) have focused on
classifying them based on integrated measurements of the total broad absorption present
in their spectra: i.e., Balnicity Index (BI - Weymann et al. 1991) and Absorption Index
(AI - Hall et al. 2002 ; Trump et al. 2006). The Balnicity Index is defined as:
BI =
∫ 25000
3000
[1− f(v)/0.9]Cdv, (1–1)
20
where f(v) is the normalized flux as a function of velocity displacement from the emission
redshift zem, and C is a parameter initially set to 0 and reset to 1 whenever the quantity
in brackets has been continuously positive over an interval of 2000 km s−1, a value
arbitrarily chosen to avoid narrow absorption. The lower limit of the integral (v = 3000
km s−1) was set to avoid counting associated absorption. BALQSOs are defined to have BI
> 0.
In the same fashion, Hall et al. (2002) defined AI to be a less restrictive measurement
of any kind of intrinsic absorption, not only BALs, and attempted to exclude intervening
absorption lines. Hall et al. (2002) proposed a definition, that was reviewed in Trump
et al. (2006):
AI =
∫ 29000
0
[1− f(v)]C ′dv, (1–2)
with the same definition for f(v) but with a C ′ that, also initially set to 0, becomes 1 in
continuous troughs that exceed the minimum depth (10%) and the minimum width (1000
km s−1). Note that BI and AI are different in their integral ranges and that zero velocity
in BI and AI is defined by using the average wavelengths of the doublet and the longest
wavelength line of the doublet, respectively. Both parameters, though, lose the information
regarding velocity (v), width and strength of the absorber(s) that can help to characterize
better the outflows, such as the energy content necessary to compute the feedback they
provide. Moreover, these studies have been confined to velocities up to ∼25000[/29000]
km s−1 due to the possible presence of Si iv absorption intertwined with C iv absorption
beyond the Si iv emission line. Outflows at higher velocities have only been found in a few
cases (Jannuzi et al. 1996; Hamann et al. 1997c; Misawa et al. 2007b) and, because they
do not contribute towards the value of BI and AI, they could not be included in previous
systematic accounts. A systematic account is necessary in order to characterize these
extreme high velocity outflows further.
21
1.3 Variability of Outflows
Variability is a fundamental characteristic of quasars. Quasars are variable in every
waveband, in the continuum, in the broad emission lines and in the absorption lines.
Quasar continua are known to vary on a variety of timescales, from days to years. Changes
occurring on scales of days to weeks can be explained by relativistic beaming effects
(e.g., Bregman et al. 1990; Fan & Lin 2000) and long-term changes (tens of years) could
be caused by several causes, such as, instabilities in the accretion disk (e.g., Rees 1984;
Siemiginowska & Elvis 1997). These changes in the photo-ionizing continuum might
modify the outflow ionization, changing the ionic populations of the absorber. We observe
this variability in the quasar absorption lines that are caused by outflowing material.
However, variability can also be explained by motion of the absorber(s). For example,
if the absorbing gas partially uncovers the line-of-sight to the background source, part
of the emission light previously absorbed is able to pass through. These possibilities can
be tested based on the variability timescales, since ionization changes cannot happen
on timescales shorter than the recombination times and the motion of the absorbers is
controlled by their velocities. Moreover, their variability can help to understand better
their evolution, both structural and dynamical, geometry, locations of absorbing gas, basic
physical conditions, cloud structure, sizes, possible instabilities, etc., which could be used
to ultimately test and constrain the developing theoretical models (i.e., Murray et al. 1995;
Proga et al. 2000).
Broad absorption lines (BALs) have been the subject of several comprehensive studies
of variability (i.e., Barlow 1993 and references therein; and more recently, Lundgren
et al. 2007; Gibson et al. 2008; Capellupo & Hamann 2009). These works have found
that BALs tend to vary in a complex manner on multi-year timescales, and the changes
are hypothesized to be due to the variable photo-ionizing continuum or to motion of the
absorbers.
22
Intrinsic Narrow Absorption Lines (NALs), which are physically related to the quasar
(in contrast to cosmologically intervening absorption), have also been found to vary
(i.e., Wise et al. 2004; Narayanan et al. 2004; Misawa et al. 2005). In the case of NALs,
variability not only provides a better characterization of the absorption as in the case of
BALs, but it is one of the commonly used criteria to discriminate between outflowing and
intervening absorbers (Barlow & Sargent 1997; Hamann et al. 1997c). Mini-BALs, which
are absorption lines with intermediate widths between NALs and BALs, also clearly form
in outflows based on their broad profiles. Misawa et al. (2005) and later Misawa et al.
(2007b) carried out the analysis of a complex mini-BAL in the quasar HS 1603+3820,
which also varied. However, the variability of mini-BALs has only been previously studied
in a handful of cases (Narayanan et al. 2004; Misawa et al. 2005).
1.4 Goals
The general goal of this thesis is to better characterize the frequency and physical
properties of quasar outflows and, in particular, those outflowing at high velocities (0.1c
– 0.2c). I start by introducing in Chapter 2 the case study of the quasar PG0935+417
(zem ≈ 1.97), which has a high velocity outflow at ∼51000 km s−1. I present new
measurements and analyses of the ionization and physical properties of this outflow. I
use a combination of ground-based (Lick observatory and Sloan Digital Sky Survey -
SDSS) and space-based (Hubble Space Telescope) spectra to measure the absorption in
C iv λ1549 and, for the first time, Ovi λ1034 and Nv λ1240 in the same outflow.
In Chapter 3, I present a comprehensive catalog of C iv absorption lines in the ∼2200
brightest SDSS quasars at 1.8≤ z ≤3.5, and select those with FWHM > 700 km s−1
to be outflow lines (unlikely to form in intervening material). The goals of compiling a
comprehensive catalog of absorption lines are to 1) quantitatively define the range of
outflow lines in quasar spectra, 2) examine their detection frequencies and distributions
in velocity, strength and FWHM, 3) look for relationships between the various absorption
line types and basic quasar properties, and 4) identify individual outflow line candidates
23
for follow-up studies, such as the analyses carried out in Chapter 2, or variability studies,
which I present in Chapter 4.
Finally, in order to characterize better the structural and physical properties of
these outflows, I carried out a monitoring program over a range of ∆t = 0.9 -3.3 years in
the quasar rest frame, using facilities at the Kitt Peak National Observatory and MDM
Observatory. I include the first results of this monitoring program in Chapter 4.
24
CHAPTER 2HIGH VELOCITY OUTFLOW IN QUASAR PG0935+417
2.1 Introduction
Hamann et al. (1997a) reported the presence of an intrinsic C ivλλ 1548,1551
mini-BAL system (FWHM of the whole profile ≈ 1500 km s−1) at a zabs ≈1.50 in the
spectrum of the non-BALQSO (zero Balnicity Index - Weymann et al. 1991) PG0935+417.
This bright quasar (V = 16.2) has an emission-line redshift of zem=1.966 (Hewitt
& Burbidge 1993); thus this C iv absorption feature is outflowing at a blue-shifted
velocity of ∼ 52000 km s−1 (zabs ≈1.50) relative to the quasar emission lines. Moreover,
high-resolution Keck observations of this quasar confirmed that the miniBAL remained
“smooth”, and did not break up in many narrow lines, at a resolution of 7 km s−1
(Hamann et al. 1997a).
The velocity of the PG0935+417 mini-BAL was the second highest flow speed
found at that date in a non-BALQSO. Jannuzi et al. (1996)’s discovery of C iv, Nv and
Ovi outflowing at 56000 km s−1 in another luminous quasar, PG2302+029, was the
highest. Although Jannuzi et al. (1996) speculated that the broad-ish absorption lines in
PG2302+029, with full widths at half minimum (FWHMs) between 3000 and 5000 km s−1,
might be cosmologically intervening instead of intrinsic to the quasar (for example, due to
warm intra-cluster gas, see Jannuzi et al. 1996), more recent observations have shown that
the mini-BALs in this quasar have variable strengths (over a couple of years timescale, see
Jannuzi 2009), implying that they form in a dense and dynamic quasar outflow.
Variability has also been found in the high velocity mini-BAL in PG0935+417.
Narayanan et al. (2004) reported a study of the absorption feature variability over a
time range of ∼ 2 years in the quasar rest-frame. Using spectra obtained at the Lick
Observatory (see Figure 4 in Narayanan et al. 2004), they confirmed the intrinsic nature of
this outflow, which seem to vary most dramatically in rest-frame timescales of ∼ 1 year.
25
In this chapter we present measurements of Ovi λλ1032, 1038 and Nv λλ1239, 1243
in the same outflow as the C iv reported by Hamann et al. (1997a), using Hubble Space
Telescope (HST) spectra available in their archives. We include a search of other ions in
the same outflow to place limits on the degree of ionization and total column density in
this outflow. We also expand the variability study of the mini-BAL in PG0935+417 by
using more recent archival spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS - 2003) and
spectra we obtained at the Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO -2007), which expands
the original rest-frame measurement interval from 2 to almost 5 years.
Two other C iv narrow absorption systems are present in the Lick spectra: a system
of narrow “associated” absorption lines (AALs at v < 5000 km s−1 - Foltz et al. 1986) at
zabs ≈1.94, and one non-associated at zabs ≈ 1.47. We defer discussion of the AAL system
to a future paper (Hamann 2009) that includes higher resolution spectroscopy.
2.2 Data
Table 2-1 summarizes the PG0935+417 data used in this study. We analyzed spectra
previously obtained during four observing runs (from 1993 to 1999) using the KAST
spectrograph at the 3.0 m telescope at the University of California Observatories (UCO)
Lick Observatory, with the wavelength coverage and resolutions (near those wavelengths of
interest) shown in Table 2-1. See Narayanan et al. (2004) for more information on these
observations and data reductions. We verified the wavelength calibrations of these data
using spectra with resolution R = λ/∆λ ≈ 34000 (∼ 0.13 A or ∼ 9 km s−1) obtained
with HIRES at the 10.0 m telescope of the W. H. Keck observatory on January 1998
(Hamann et al. 2008). Comparison to intervening lines (3964.02 A, 3997.09 A and 4400.50
A) in the Keck spectra suggested the shift of the Lick spectra to match these narrow
absorption lines. The Keck spectra wavelengths had been already shifted to vacuum in the
heliocentric frame.
To look for the presence of other lines at the same redshift as the C iv mini-BAL,
we examined archival Hubble Space Telescope spectra obtained with the Faint Object
26
Table 2-1. Observation logs
Observatory Date λ Range (A) Exposure time (s) Resolution
Lick 1993 Mar1 3250-5350 1200 8001
Lick 1996 Mar 3250-4600 2700 1300
Lick 1997 Feb 3250-6000 2700 1300
Lick 1999 Jan 3250-6000 3000 1300
HST (FOS) 1994 Oct 2270-3270 2046 1300
HST (FOS) 1995 Nov 2270-3270 8910 1300
SDSS 2003 Jan 3800-9200 2250 2000KPNO Jan 2007 3600-6200 9000 1300
1 Date and resolution were incorrect in Narayanan et al. (2004).
Spectrograph (FOS) using the G270H grating and a 0.′′3 aperture on 1994 October 7 and
1995 November 13. Four exposures in 1995 and one in 1994 provided total exposure times
of 8910 and 2046 s, respectively. These spectra have a resolution R = 1300 (230 km s−1)
and were obtained from the Space Telescope Science Institute archives already reduced
and calibrated. We verified the wavelengths using Galactic absorption lines (Fe ii λ2383
and Mg ii λ2796, λ2804), which we assumed to be at their laboratory wavelengths. We did
not make further corrections for the motion of HST or the Earth around the Sun, but we
note that these adjustments would be small compared to the resolution of the spectra and
they would not affect any of the results discussed in this study. We found no discernable
variability in the lines of interest between HST observations, and thus we averaged all of
the HST spectra together to improve the signal-to-noise ratio.
Finally, we examined more recent spectra to extend the time baseline and monitor
the variability of the C iv mini-BAL absorption line. Archival spectra were obtained
from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) with resolution R ∼ 2000 (150 km s−1;
Adelman-McCarthy et al. 2008). We also obtained more recent spectra with the GoldCam
spectrometer at the 2.1 m telescope at the Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO) with
resolution R ∼ 1300 (150 km s−1) in 2007.
27
The KPNO data were reduced and spectra were extracted using packages from the
Image Reduction and Analysis Facility (IRAF) and our own software (coded in IDL).
HeNeAr lamps were used for the wavelength calibrations and quartz lamps were used for
the flat-fields, both located inside the spectrograph. We used the overscan to subtract
the intrinsic noise of the CCD. A one dimension response function was sufficient to create
an appropriate flat. The data were flux calibrated using KPNO standards. We did not
perform absolute flux calibrations. For more information see Chapter 4.
The HST data were not taken simultaneously with the Lick data (see Table 2-1).
The HST data do not vary significantly (beyond the noise) between the 1994 and 1995
observations, thus both spectra were combined. However, the closest in time Lick spectra
(1993 and 1996) are indeed variable between 1993 and 1996 (see §2.4.2). In this chapter,
we discuss primarily measurements of the C iv feature in the Lick 1996 spectrum because
it is the closest in time and because of its absorption-line shape similarities with the
absorption in the 1997 and 1999 spectra.
See Table 2-1 for more information on these data and §2.4.2 for further discussion on
the variability.
2.3 Analysis
2.3.1 Line Identification
Figure 2-1 shows the 1996 optical spectrum of PG0935+417, where we have marked
several absorption systems. The C iv absorption feature is more complex than was
originally reported. Besides the C iv mini-BAL at an observed wavelength of ∼ 3860
A (zabs ≈ 1.50) previously reported in Hamann et al. (1997a) and Narayanan et al.
(2004), we found another C iv absorption system at an observed wavelength of ∼ 3920
A (zabs ≈ 1.53). We also found two narrow C iv absorption systems and although we are
not studying these systems in this work, we looked for the presence of other lines at those
redshifts that could be blended with the lines of interest at zabs ≈ 1.50 (see below).
28
Figure 2-2 shows the combined HST spectrum where we have marked the locations
of lines typically found in BALs (Hamann 1998; Arav et al. 2001). The strong absorption
feature at an observed wavelength of ∼ 2885 A is an unrelated Damped Lyα line at zabs =
1.37. The Lyman limit at ∼ 2240 A (Figure 2-2) corresponds to the narrow absorption
system at zabs ≈ 1.47. There is no significant Lyman limit absorption related to the
mini-BAL outflow system at zabs ≈ 1.50.
We detect for the first time Ovi λλ1032,1038 and Nv λλ1239,1243 mini-BALs
in the HST spectra at similar velocities as the C iv mini-BAL reported by Hamann
et al. (1997a). We searched for other ions at the same redshift: Lyα λ1216, Lyβ λ1026,
O i λλ989,1302, C i λλ945,1277, C ii λ1036, C iii λ977, N ii λ1084, N iii λ990, Si ii
λλλ1190,1193,1260, Si iii λ1207, Si iv λλ1394,1403, S iv λ1063, Pv λλ1118,1128, and
Svi λλ 933,946. No other detections are surely confirmed, partly due to the difficulty that
the Lyα forest imposes, and partly due to the coincidence in wavelength with other ions of
the other systems mentioned above. We find that C iii at zabs ≈ 1.50 is located at a very
similar wavelength compared to N iii at zabs ≈ 1.47. Nonetheless, in several cases (C iii,
N iii, Pv, Si iv Lyα and Lyβ) we place upper limits for the absorption measurements (see
§2.3.3).
Figure 2-3 shows the C iv mini-BAL (Lick 1996 spectrum - dot-dashed line)
over-plotted over the Nv and Ovi absorption (HST spectrum - solid line), on a velocity
scale relative to the quasar emission redshift. Although the presence of the Lyα forest
contaminates both the Ovi and Nv absorption features, the right separation of the Ovi
doublet and the strong absorption in both ions at the velocity of the C iv mini-BAL
suggests the certainty of the detection. The Nv doublet is not clearly detected, but the
strength and overall appearance of the absorption at the predicted location suggests that
most of this feature is the mini-BAL system.
29
Figure 2-1. Optical spectrum obtained at Lick observatory in 1996. Prominent broademission lines are labeled across the top. Tick marks indicated the location ofthe each line of the doublet absorption lines. The C iv mini-BALs lie at anobserved wavelength of ∼ 3860 A (zabs ≈ 1.50) and ∼ 3920 A (zabs ≈ 1.53).We have marked the location of Si iv and C ii in the same outflow, althoughwe do not confirm their detection. Besides that system, we have labeled anassociated system at zabs = 1.94 and another system at zabs = 1.47, which areused to study the certainty of detections of other ions in the absorption systemof interest that could be confused with ions in these systems.
2.3.2 Continuum Normalization
To facilitate measurements of the absorption lines, we normalized the Lick, HST,
KPNO and SDSS spectra. In Figure 2-4 we show the normalization of the Lick 1996
spectrum. First, we fit a power law to the continuum (fλ ∝ λ−0.8), constrained in three
narrow wavelength bands free of emission or absorption (1272-1276 A, 1434-1443 A,
and 1449-1455 A, in the restframe of the quasar). Second, we fit single Gaussians to the
30
Figure 2-2. Ultraviolet spectrum from the HST archive (1994 and 1995 spectra combined).Prominent broad emission lines are labeled across the top. Tick marks indicatethe location of expected lines in the zabs ≈ 1.50 outflow. The strong absorptionfeature at observed wavelength ∼ 2870 A is an unrelated Damped Lyα atzabs ∼1.37. The strong Lyman Limit (LL) at a observed wavelength ∼ 2250 Acorresponds to the also unrelated absorption system at zabs ∼ 1.47
emission lines around the C iv absorption (Si ii λ1263A, O i λ1305A, C ii λ1335A, and
Si iv+O iv] λ1400A). The location of this pseudo-continuum is particularly uncertain in
the region ∼1280-1350 A in the rest frame due to the several parameters that take part
in the fitting of the weaker emission lines (Si ii, O i and C ii). We constrained our fits to
these emission lines to be redshifted by ∼ 300 km s−1 with respect to the redshift of the
stronger Si iv+O iv] feature, for which the best single-gaussian fit occurs at zem = 1.94.
This redshift agrees well with the value zem = 1.966 reported by Tytler and Fan (1992),
based on lower ionization lines (Mg ii and Lyα). We also constrained the Full Width
31
Figure 2-3. HST spectra after normalization, showing the high-velocity mini-BALs for Oviand Nv (solid lines), with over-plotted C iv from the normalized Lickspectrum (dotted-dashed lines), shown in velocity scaled relative to theemission redshift. The HST spectrum includes many lines unrelated to themini-BALs (Lyα forest). Vertical lines show where we expected to find thelines in the Ovi and Nv doublets. In the case of Nv, although strongabsorption is presence, the doublet seems to be blended with Lyα forest lines.
at Half Maxima (FWHM) of O i and C ii to be roughly 60% of the Si iv+O iv] FWHM
based on spectra of quasar composites (Craig Warner, private communication). An extra
Gaussian was used to fit the red wing of the Lyα+Nv λ1240 A blend. The final result is
plotted in Figure 2-4.
32
Figure 2-4. Normalization of the Lick 1996 spectrum. The solid straight line under thespectrum represents a fit to the continuum with a power law. Dashed linesrepresent our fit to Gaussians for the following emission lines: Lyα (rightslope), Si ii, O i, C ii, and Si iv) around the C iv mini-BAL, marked with anhorizontal line. Because the absorption feature at an observed λ ∼ 3920 A isreal absorption it was excluded in the emission fitting.
Figure 2-5 shows our fits to the continuum and emission lines in the HST spectra
around the Nv (left) and Ovi (right) absorbers. The Lyα forest makes it difficult to
define a continuum normalization around the Ovi and Nv absorption lines. In order to
exclude the numerous intervening absorption lines in the Lyα forest, we fit the continua
locally around the absorption of interest and constrained the fits using only very narrow
ranges in wavelength (indicated by the solid lines above the spectra). In the case of the
continuum around Ovi, we fitted the local continuum with a second order polynomial.
Our approach is very conservative and might result in a suppressed continuum, which
might imply that our measurements of the Ovi strengths (§2.3.3) are underestimated.
In the case of the continuum around Nv (top panel of Fig.2-5) because of the
presence of an Ovi λλ1032,1038 broad emission line, we fit a straight line to the
continuum and added a Gaussian to represent the Ovi in emission. The location and
33
shape of this Gaussian is based on our own judgement on selecting the constraining
narrow wavelength ranges to be fitted. We decided to take a conservative approach and
fit a weak Gaussian that, once removed, might result in some remaining emission. We
centered the Ovi emission Gaussian at a redshift zem ≈ 1.92. This redshift is consistent
with the decrement of emission redshifts at higher ionizations, comparing to the other
redshifts (1.966 and 1.939) based on lower ionization lines (Mg ii and Si iv, respectively),
mentioned before.
Similar local continua were normalized around the absorption of C iii, N iii, Si iv, Pv,
Lyα, and Lyβ.
2.3.3 Line Measurements and Physical Quantities
To extract quantitative information from the mini-BALs and broader absorbers, we
needed to fit the lines detected in the outflow. We assumed the line strengths are given by
Iv = Io(1− Cf ) + CfIoe−τv (2–1)
where Io is the intensity of the normalized continuum, Cf is the line-of-sight coverage
fraction (0 ≤ Cf ≤ 1), a measurement of the coverage of the emission source by the
absorber, and τv is the optical depth (Hamann & Ferland 1999). For simplicity due to the
medium resolution of the spectra, we have assumed that the Cf has only one value over
the whole profile. We also have assumed that the optical depths are Gaussians defined as
τv = τoe− v2
b2 (2–2)
where τo is the optical depth at the center of the line, v is the velocity and b is the
Doppler parameter. When doublet resonance lines such as C iv, Nv and Ovi are not
saturated, their oscillator strengths dictate different line strengths because the true optical
depth ratio is 2:1 for all of them.
Figure 2-6 shows the fits performed over C iv Nv, and Ovi. Thick lines represent
the final fit, which is a combination of three features (A, B, and C). We corrected for
34
Figure 2-5. Normalization of the HST spectrum (two epochs combined) around the Nvλλ1239,1243 absorption line (∼1035-1065 A, in the quasar restframe) - top -and around the Ovi λλ1032,1038 absorption line (∼ 860-890 A) - bottom.Solid lines above each spectrum represent the range chosen for the polynomialfit, which is represented by dotted lines. The continuum at the left of Nv(top) also shows a Ovi broad emission line, represented as a single Gaussianand extacted from the spectrum.
instrumental broadening Gaussian deconvolution. This has a small effect on only the
narrowest system A. Features A and B were detected in the C iv absorption and are
present in Ovi and Nv as well, while a C component of the absorption seems to
be present in Ovi and Nv, but not in C iv. Because C iv lies in a region free from
contamination with Lyα lines, we used, as a first approximation for the fits of the features
35
Figure 2-6. Line fitting to C iv in the 1996 Lick spectrum (top), Ovi (middle) and Nv(bottom). Thick lines represent the results of the combination of the threecomponents of the absorption (A, B, and C - dotted lines). A coverage fractionof Cf = 0.8 was used for every component of every ion. The C iv narrowabsorption feature at bluer wavelengths than the C iv Lick absorption is theunrelated system at zabs ≈ 1.47.
36
A and B in Ovi and Nv, the redshift and FWHM of the features A and B in C iv.
In particular, we fit feature B in C iv and used it as a template in Ovi and Nv, only
allowing for changes in τo. However, another broader component (C) seems to be present
both in Ovi and Nv, while it is apparently non-existent in C iv. We used the parameters
resulting from the Ovi fit of the feature A and C to construct the Nv fit because of
the presence of many Lyα lines blended with the Nv absorption did not allow us to
perform an actual fit, especially over the A feature. Note that the features A, B and C are
defined for convenience only for the the HST and Lick 1996 data sets. The multi-epoch
observations across C iv show that the character of the absorption changes significantly.
In particular, A, B and C lose their identity altogether in the later SDSS and KPNO
spectra as we will discuss later while describing their variability. The variability and
absorbers kinematics will be discussed in section §2.4.2.
Figure 2-6 shows that the two strong narrow components of Ovi seem to be present
in a ∼1:1 depth ratio, characteristic of saturated profiles, although saturation is not
occurring at zero flux. Since the profiles are resolved (FWHM > 150 km s−1), this
indicates partial coverage of the background emission source (i.e., the emission source is
not completely covered by the outflow in our line of sight, Hamann & Ferland 1999). We
obtain a value of Cf ' 0.8 for Ovi. Since feature A in Ovi is the only feature and ion
where we can distinguish both lines in the doublet, we used this value for all the other
ions, although we are aware of other studies where it has been found that Cf may vary
from ion to ion (Hamann et al. 1997c) and that the C iv, in particular, could have any
value from 1 to 0.4 since it was not observed simultaneously with the HST data. We also
include measurements based on Cf = 1 in Tables 2-2 and 2-3 for comparison.
Table 2-2 includes the results for Cf (v) = 1 and 0.8. Values for the Rest Equivalent
Width (REW) are derived by integrating over the fitted profile, combining all of the
components that are present (thick solid lines in Figure 2-6). The errors in REW are
derived by varying the continuum to the highest and lowest possible continuum based
37
on visual inspection. This yields conservative large ±2.5σ limits on the REW. Table 2-2
lists the 1σ errors based on this scheme. Absorption redshifts (zabs) and thus velocities
are derived from the centroid of the fits to the individual doublet components. Values of
FWHM were measured over the fit to the shorter wavelength line in each doublet. For
the fits of component A we use different Doppler parameters b for C iv than for Ovi and
Nv, as required by the data. For component B we use the values obtained in the C iv
fit for the other two ions, and for component C, apparently not present in C iv, we use
the value for Ovi for Nv as well. Column densities (Nion) are derived by integrating the
fitting profiles using the lower oscillation strength line in each doublet; oscillator strengths
were obtained from Verner et al. (1994). Because the absorption in Ovi and Nv is highly
contaminated with the Lyα forest, we considered that all the values of Nion and τo for
these ions should be upper limits, except for the Ovi A component, that seems to be
clearly present, and it is indicated with a sign “∼>” because in the case of saturation any
value of τ greater than 2.8 would be viable. However, we point out that these results and
upper limits for Ovi might be underestimated, because of our conservative approach to
the continuum fit across the line (cf. Figs 2-2 and 2-5). Errors in column densities listed in
Table 2-2 were derived in the same manner as for the REWs.
Table 2-2. Results of the profile fitting of C iv, Nv, and Ovi.
Cf=1 Cf=0.8ion REW comp v FWHM Nion τo FWHM Nion τo
(A) (km/s) (km/s) (1015 cm−2) (km/s) (1015 cm−2)
C iv 3.63+0.14−0.16 A 51260 1180 0.547+0.011
−0.012 0.18 1180 0.719+0.016−0.017 0.25
B 46820 1580a 0.090+0.007−0.010 0.03 1580a 0.115+0.008
−0.013 0.04
Nv <5.2 A 51320 660b < 0.6 < 0.24 680b < 0.8 < 0.33B 46820 1580a < 0.2 < 0.03 1580a < 0.2 < 0.04C 50860 2500c < 1.1 < 0.11 2540c < 1.6 < 0.16
Ovi 7.6+0.4−0.3 A 51320 720b 2.41+0.15
−0.15 0.7 780b∼> 8.2 ∼> 2.8
B 46820 1600a < 2.26 < 0.16 1600a < 0.72 < 0.08C 50860 2510c < 0.63 0.07 2540c < 2.8 < 0.2
a, b and c locked together (see text).
We performed exactly the same procedure for the C iv absorption in the other Lick
spectra (1993, 1997 and 1999). Results in 1997 and 1999 are very similar to 1996, except
for the lack of a clearly present component B, although, as we mentioned before, features
38
A, B and C lose their identity as time evolves. Variability will be discussed further in
§2.4.2.
As noted above (see section 2.3.1), we do not clearly detect absorption in C iii,
N iii, Pv, Si iv, Lyα or Lyβ, at the redshift of the C iv, Nv and Ovi absorbers. All of
these features lie in the Lyα forest and in every case there is some absorption present.
Therefore, we outlined absorption profiles for component A in the blue-shifted wavelengths
of these ions to place upper limits on the column densities and set limits on the absorber
ionization. We use the same zabs and b parameters as in Ovi (for lines found in the HST
spectra) and C iv (for the lines in the Lick spectra) for the A component and increase
the strength of the line (τ) until it was obviously much stronger than the data at the
wavelengths of interest. Figure 2-7 shows examples of these upper limits and Table 2-3
includes the results.
Table 2-3. Upper limits on lines not detected
Cf=0.8ion REW (A) Nion (1015 cm−2)C iii < 1.3 < 0.36N iii < 0.4 < 0.55Pv < 0.5 < 0.09Si iv < 1.7 < 0.17Lyα < 1.6 < 0.5Lyβ < 0.8 < 1.57
We can also place an upper limit for the edge at the Lyman limit in this system
(which is definitely not very strong - see Figure 2-2). The small decline of the continuum
corresponds to an optical depth τLL ∼< 0.2.
2.4 Discussion
2.4.1 Ionization and Total Column Density of the Outflow
To study the physical properties of these clouds we analyze their degree of ionization,
which is quantified by the ionization parameter, U , the dimensionless ratio of
hydrogen-ionizing photon to hydrogen space densities at the illuminated face of the
cloud. We constrain its value from different approaches.
39
Figure 2-7. Upper limits to absorption lines for C iii (top left), N iii (top right) and Pv(bottom) based on component A only in C iv in the 1996 Lick spectrum.
Hamann & Ferland (1999) presented results of theoretical ratios of column densities
for different ions calculated by CLOUDY photoionization simulations in photoionized
clouds that are optically thin in the Lyman continuum. We used these results (as shown in
their Figure 10) to estimate U from the theoretical ratios of column densities for different
ions of the same element (such as C iii and C iv) and for different elements (such as C iv
and Ovi), assuming solar abundances (Grevesse & Sauval 1998).
We estimated U to be log U ∼> -1.1 for both components A or B, from the ratio
between N(C iv) and N(Ovi), using Cf = 0.8 (where N(Ovi) is a lower limit - see section
§2.3.3 for comments on column densities). We also calculated a limit on U from the ratio
of column densities of component A in C iv and C iii, N(C iv)/N(C iii) ∼> 2, from which
we obtain another lower limit of log U ≥ −2.2, which is less restrictive than the previous
40
one. Obtaining such a high ionization, we do not expect to find many low ionization lines.
From the remaining of this discussion we will use the value of log U ∼> -1.1.
If the metalicity (O/H) is solar and the ionization maximizes the amount of Ovi,
such that N(Ovi)/N(O)≈ 0.4 at log U = -1.0 (see Figure 10 from Hamann & Ferland
1999), we can estimate a total column density (NH) as follows:
NH =N(H)
N(O)
N(O)
N(OV I)N(OV I) (2–3)
which yields the value NH ∼> 3.0 x 1019 cm−2 (using only component A). This value is a
lower limit both because N(Ovi) is a lower limit (Table 2-2) and because the actual ratio
N(Ovi)/N(O) might be smaller. Super-solar metallicities, as reported in high redshift
quasars (Dietrich et al. 2003), might decrease this NH limit by factors of a few.
The upper limit on the Lyα column density (see Table 2-3) can be used to derive a
lower limit on U : log U ∼> -0.6. The absence of a Lyman edge is consistent with this limit.
The value of log U ∼> -0.6 is somewhat larger than the Ovi result of log U ∼ -1.1. This
higher ionization in Equation 2–3 would also lead to a larger NH limit, which could be
mitigated somewhat by higher metallicities. However, it appears overall that our estimates
of log U ∼> -1.1 and NH ∼> 3.0 x 10 19 cm−2 are firm lower limits and are consistent with
the non-detections of other low to moderate ionizations lines such as C iii and Si iv.
2.4.2 Nature of the Absorber, Variability and Kinematics
Strong C iv and Ovi absorption are clearly present at zabs ≈ 1.50, and they appear
to be accompanied by strong (but blended) Nv absorption. The high-velocity absorption
profiles are complex and highly variable. Multi-epoch observations across the C iv feature
(see also Narayanan et al. 2004 and below in this section) show variable absorption across
a velocity interval of at least 45000 to 54300 km s−1 relative to the emission redshift
derived from low ionization lines (zem = 1.966). In the 1996 spectrum we identify distinct
mini-BALs in C iv that we labeled A and B (Figure 2-6). However, these features evolve
and lose their identities altogether in subsequent observations. Although the velocity
41
centroid and deepest part of the C iv trough shifts between observations, there is no clear
evidence for acceleration or deceleration in the outflow.
A comparison of the C iv and Ovi lines in 1994/1995(HST)–1996(Lick) also suggests
further that the absorber has an ionization dependence. In particular, the Ovi absorption
includes a broad feature (component C with FWHM ∼ 2500 km s−1) that is not present
in C iv and the narrow component (A) is considerably narrower in Ovi (FWHM ∼ 750
km s−1) than it is in C iv (FWHM ∼ 1200 km s−1). These differences might be affected
by the line variabilities since the spectra were taken at different observation times (∼1.5 month separation in the quasar time restframe). However, we note that the Ovi
absorption did not change significantly between the two HST observations in 1994 and
1995, and the C iv line measured from 1993 to 1996 had a consistently broader component
A and no very broad component C.
The C iv (measured in the 1996 spectrum), and maybe the Ovi and Nv lines
also have absorption at lower velocities (component B in Figure 2-6), better matched
by absorption profiles with v ∼ 47000 km s−1 (zabs ∼ 1.53). The later evolution of this
feature (see Figure 2-8) suggests that it might be real absorption. Note again that the Nv
absorption profile is severely contaminated by Lyα forest lines, but its overall appearance
is consistent with the Ovi mini-BALs.
Our best estimate for the Coverage Fraction is Cf = 0.8. This value was derived from
the mild saturation of the component A in the Ovi ion, as the data suggests. None of
the other components in Ovi and in the other ions allowed for a determination of the Cf
because both components of the doublet are blended together or with Lyα forest lines.
There is still some uncertainty in this result due to possible blending with Lyα forest lines.
However, the features we attribute to Ovi have the correct doublet separation, nearly the
same FWHMs and they appear at essentially the same redshift as component A measured
in C iv. The Ovi absorption occurs at wavelengths away from the broad emission lines
and therefore the absorber must partially cover the quasar continuum source.
42
Repeat observations of the C iv line show that all of these absorption components
are highly variable (see Figure 4 in Narayanan et al. 2004). More recent data (provided
by the Sloan Digital Survey Sky Survey - SDSS- and observed at the Kitt Peak National
Observatory - KPNO) shows that the variability has continued. Figure 2-8 compares the
Lick spectra in 1996, used in the analysis in this work, to the newer SDSS spectrum
obtained in 2003 and KPNO spectrum obtained in Jan 2007. The most dramatic
variability occurs between 1999 and 2003. The SDSS 2003 spectrum shows that the
absorption profile identified as A in the 1996 spectrum in Figure 2-6 has almost completely
disappeared and the absorption identified as B has increased in strength and width. The
complexity of the absorption profile in 2003 and 2007 suggests that A and B absorptions
are intertwined and thus it does not have a clear meaning to use them to identify the
profiles in the spectra beyond 1999. Between 2003 and 2007, the absorption remains
quite similar in strength, and we would like to note only a change in the maximum depth,
which shifts from v ∼ 47000 km s−1 in the 2003 spectrum to v ∼ 49000 km s−1 in the
2007 one. Similar shifts in the centroid velocity were reported between the previous Lick
observations in Narayanan et al. (2004).
2.4.3 Origin of the Outflow, Timescales and Causes for Variability
The combined properties of broad smooth absorption troughs, line variability on
time scales ≤ 1 yr in the quasar rest frame, and extremely small clouds implied by partial
covering of the quasar continuum source strongly suggest that the high velocity absorption
forms in an outflow very near the quasar (see also Hamann et al. 1997c and Hamann
& Simon 2009). The variability times, in particular, provide direct constraints on the
absorber location. If the flow is photoionized and the line changes are caused by changes
in the ionizing flux, then the recombination time sets an approximate lower limit on the
outflow gas density (see Hamann et al. 1995 and Hamann et al. 1997c). The smallest
variability time we measure in C iv, ∼ 1 yr in the quasar rest frame, corresponds to a
minimum electron density nH ∼> 1.1 x 105 cm−3. This, in turn, yields a maximum distance
43
Figure 2-8. Variability in the high velocity C iv λλ1548,1551 feature (∼3850-3900 A inobserved wavelengths) over a period of ten years. Emission+continuum aroundhas been divided by a linear fit to show only variations in absorption, althoughthere may be some remaining emission in the region around of the C ivmini-BAL. The absorption feature in the SDSS spectrum may seem weakerthan the other two spectra. However, the component outflowing at a slightlylower v (∼ 47000 km s−1, ∼ 3920 A in observed wavelength) seems stronger inthe SDSS spectrum.
between the absorber and the quasar emission source because the ionization parameter
scales like U ∝ LnH r2 , where L is the quasar luminosity, nH ∼ ne is the absorber density,
and r is the radial distance. We estimate L ∼ 67 x 1046 erg s−1 for PG0935 and thus
derive r ∼< 1.1 kpc using log U ∼> -1.1 and nH ∼> 1.1 x 105 cm−3 in Equation 6 in Hamann
& Simon (2009). This result clearly rules out absorption by high velocity clouds far away
from the quasar or in the outer host galaxy.
44
However, the complex velocity-dependent variations that we observe might be difficult
to explain by simple changes in the ionizing flux. The line changes could also be caused by
clouds moving across our lines of sight to the continuum sources (see also Hamann et al.
2008). In that case, the transverse velocities (perpendicular to our sightlines) must be
large enough to cross a significant portion of the far-UV emission source in a variability
time. Specifically, the smallest observed variability time, ∼ 1 yr, and the continuum region
diameter, ∼0.003 pc at 1550 A, require transverse velocities vtr ∼> 2900 km s−1. These
velocities are similar to disk rotation speeds beyond the radius of the C iv BEL region
RCIV (vtr ∼ 3000 km s−1), and therefore this scenario is plausible.
We cannot establish whether the outflow was launched in an inner or outer region
compared to the Broad Emission Line Region (BELR). However, during these (at least)
4.7 years, the outflow has travelled over a region larger than the size of the BELR; thus
even if launched inner to it, the ouflow should be outside of it at the present time. We
estimate the RCIV to be ∼ 5 x 1017 cm from a bolometric luminosity Lbol ∼ 67 x 1046
erg s−1) derived from the observed flux at restframe 1450 A(Lλ(1450A) = 7 x 10−12 erg
s−1 cm−2), using a cosmology with Ho = 71 km s−1 Mpc, ΩM = 0.27, ΩΛ = 0.73 and
a standard bolometric correction factor of L ≈ 3.4λLλ(1450A). Because the velocity
seems to have remained constant, we can derive a flow time to travel the RBELR of
tf ∼ RCIV/v ∼ 3.5 years, shorter than the restframe timescale during which this outflow
has remained present.
The parameters obtained for the flow are consistent with radiative acceleration.
We can use the approach described in Hamann (1998), who derives the launch radius
by integrating the motion equation for a radiative pressure driven wind from an initial
“launch” radius to infinity with a certain terminal velocity. We obtain a launch radius in
this case of Rlaunch ≈ 70 pc for PG0935+417. Note that the equation in Hamann (1998)
requires the use of a fraction of the spectral energy distribution absorbed or scattered in
the wind. We have assumed fL ≈ 1 because it is the typical value for BAL flows (Hamann
45
1998). However, this parameter may be smaller for winds with narrower lines such as the
mini-BAL in PG0935+417. If instead of absorbing 10% of the radiation the outflow only
absorbs 5%, the launch radius would decrease by ∼50%. These results are consistent with
radiation pressure powering this outflow.
Is PG0935+417 special? In spite of its extreme speed, as long as fL is not too
small, the flow can be launched within 70 pc of the continuum source and accelerated by
radiation pressure. However, the actual physical processes that could produce a flow like
this are not understood. Observationally, we know that flows with speeds v > 50000 km
s−1 are rare - much rarer than flows with v < 25000 km s−1, for example (see Chapter 3).
As it seems, we do not need to invoke a very small radius to launch this outflow. Then, if
it is easy to launch these high velocity outflows, they should be a common phenomenon in
quasars. However, as reported in Chapter 3 we find outflows at v > 25000 km s−1 in 2.5%
of optically selected quasars. The luminosity in PG0935+417 is not close to the Eddington
Luminosity (LEdd). Since MBH ∼ 3 x 1010 M¯, we obtain a L/LEdd ∼ 0.2. Therefore, more
than a special particularity of this individual quasar, we conclude that, considering that
the statistical sample in Chapter 3 is observed from every angle, the “angle of sight” of
these high velocity absorbers must be narrow to only appear in 2.5% of the cases.
X-ray observations are needed to constrain better the total absorbing column and
examine the relationship of this high-speed outflow to the stronger but generally lower
velocity BALs.
2.5 Conclusion
Energetic outflows are common phenomena in AGNs that could help us understand
the mechanisms that power the central regions of these luminous engines. Outflows
are observed in the spectra of quasars as blueshifted absorption lines. I present new
measurements and analyses of these absorption lines in the spectra of the quasar
PG0935+417 (zem ≈ 1.966). This quasar shows a high velocity C iv mini-Broad
Absorption Line (mini-BAL) outflowing at ∼51000 km s−1. We detect, using Lick
46
observatory, Hubble Space Telescope, and Sloan Digital Sky Survey spectra, absorption in
C iv λλ1548,1551 (already reported in Hamann et al. 1997a and Narayanan et al. 2004)
and, for the first time in this outflow, in Nv λλ1240 and Ovi λλ1034 in this mini-BAL
system. The absence of lower ionization lines indicates that the flow is highly ionized
with an ionization parameter log U ∼> -1.1. The resolved Ovi indicates that the lines are
moderately saturated with the absorber covering just ∼80% of the background continuum
source. We estimate the total column density to be NH ∼> 3.0 x 1019 cm−2, which is small
enough to be compatible with radiation pressure mechanisms accelerating this outflow.
47
CHAPTER 3AN INVENTORY OF C iv MINI-BALS AND OUTFLOW LINES IN SDSS QUASARS
3.1 Introduction
A first step towards comprehending better the nature of quasar outflows requires
a complete inventory, without pre-selections based on BI, AI, FWHM or velocity. To
compile such a catalog, we initiated a program to produce a complete catalog of all
C iv λλ1548,1551 absorption lines in optically selected quasars from the Sloan Digital
Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 4 (DR4). We examined the 2200 brightest quasars at
redshifts z ∼ 2 that, due to the SDSS wavelength coverage, allowed us to identify and
measure every available C iv λλ1548,1551 absorption line in the SDSS quasar spectra.
In Nestor et al. (2008), we presented a statistical study on the C iv outflows observed
as narrow absorption lines (FWHM < 600 km s−1) to exclude the more obvious outflow
lines. In Nestor et al. (2008) we concluded that a significant number of narrow absorption
lines (≥43%±6%), in the velocity range 750 km s−1 ∼< v ∼< 12000 km s−1 and with Rest
Equivalent in the C ivλ1548 line (REWλ1548)>0.3 A, are quasar outflows. In the present
work we study the C iv absorption lines detected as broader absorption (FWHM ≥ 600
km s−1) with the goal of identifying individual outflow absorbers and characterizing their
frequency. Due to the SDSS resolution, blends of intervening narrow lines, could appear
as broader absorption lines. Thus, it is necessary to set a threshold to discard these
intervening absorption lines. In Section 3.4 we explain how we select a high-confidence
zone of the FWHM space where we have excluded the intervening absorption.
Our analysis emphasizes the mini-BALs because they are the least studied class to
date. However, the goal of this chapter is to characterize outflows in a more general way,
as we include BALs in this analysis as well. The information regarding v, width, and
strength allows us to study whether different classes of absorption lines are more or less
frequent at different velocities, and whether or not they coexist in the same line of sight.
Also, we study the frequency of outflows at high velocities (v ∼> 25000 km s−1), up to Lyα,
48
which is probably the bluest-possible detection of C iv at these redshifts because the Lyα
forest likely produces ambiguous C iv identification in the shortward of the Lyα emission
line.
This chapter starts by introducing the sample we used (§3.2) and how the catalog
of C iv outflows was developed (§3.3). In §3.4 we introduce a working definition for
mini-BALs and in §3.5 we discuss their frequency of occurance in quasar spectra and
their relation to the frequency of other types of absorption features (BALs, AALs, Mg ii),
and the quasar radio properties. Finally, we summarize the main results of this work and
discuss some implications for the overall study of quasar outflows (§3.6).
3.2 Quasar Sample
We examined 2210 quasar spectra from the SDSS Data Release 4 (DR4). The
data span a wavelength range of 3820 A (with resolution R = 1800) to 9200 A (with
R = 2100). In order to study the incidence of high velocity C iv λλ1548,1550 absorption
outflowing with at least v ∼ 30000 km s−1 in quasar rest frame velocity space, we
selected quasars with quasar redshift zem ≥ 1.8. To study the distribution of narrow
C iv absorbers near the quasars (Nestor et al. 2008) we needed accurate measures of the
quasar redshifts. SDSS quasar redshifts are calculated using automated algorithms. To
determine more accurate velocity zero-points by using the Mg ii λλ2796,2803 emission
lines, which required a maximum SDSS quasar redshift of 2.25, we examined the ∼1000
brightest quasar spectra (with the highest median S/N in the r-band, ≥17.9) with 1.8
≤ zem ≤ 2.25. We supplemented this sample for two different reasons. First, to study
the incidence of absorption lines at relatively low quasar-frame velocity (results reported
in Nestor et al. 2008), we added 500 quasar spectra with 1.6≤ zem ≤ 1.8 (r-band S/N
≥18.7). Second, to study the incidence of absorption lines at very high velocity (v ≥ 30000
km s−1 and up to 60000 km s−1), we supplemented the sample with 700 quasar spectra
with zem ≥ 2.14 (r-band S/N≥17.1). Precise zero-point velocity determinations are not a
concern when studying these high-velocity absorption lines. Although accurate velocity
49
zero-points are not crucial for the analysis carried out in this chapter, we benefited from
the zem measurements from Nestor et al. (2008) when available.
Visual inspection revealed that some objects were misidentified stars; those were
rejected, resulting in 2200 spectra with zem ≥ 1.6 that comprised our final sample.
3.3 Identification and Measurements of C iv Absorption Lines
With the goal of producing the first systematic account of C ivλλ1548,1550 outflows
in quasar spectra, we identified and measured every C iv doublet in every quasar spectrum
in the sample described in §3.2.
We fit pseudo-continua using a cubic spline function for the underlying continuum
and one or more Gaussians for the broad emission lines to each quasar spectrum, and
flagged C iv absorption candidates in a manner identical to that described in Nestor et al.
(2005), but using updated versions of the software, adjusted to suit the C iv doublet
(Nestor et al. 2008). Each continuum fit and detected candidate was visually inspected. In
order to avoid “fitting-out” smooth broad absorption and missing very shallow absorption,
and to check that the software was identifying good power law continua, we inspected the
region covered from Lyα1216 A to ∼1700 A. We verified the production of a good local
continuum around absorption lines, marked whenever it was uncertain, and eliminated
redundant and spurious detections; the continuum fitting sometimes produced probable
false-positive broad absorption lines, and we marked as questionable cases those where the
presence of absorption was ambiguous. The blended Lyα+Nv λλ1239,1243 emission lines
sometimes presented problems for the continuum-fitting software. To avoid potential errors
we excluded these regions (v ∼> 60000 km s−1) from the analysis. In the case of narrow
absorption lines where both components of the doublet are resolved and distinguishable,
the software requires the correct doublet separation of ∆v ∼500 km s−1. In the case of
broad absorption lines (where individual lines of the doublet are not distinguishable), we
let the software select every absorption trough and verified that the C iv identification was
correct, excluding any ambiguous cases. For example, the sometimes present gap between
50
the doublet Si ivλλ1394,1403 and the doublet O iv]λλ1397,1400 emission lines (v ∼30000 km s−1) could be mistaken for absorption, and therefore we excluded absorption
candidates from this region unless they were wide or strong enough to not likely be
explained by separation between the emission lines, cases that we marked down also as
questionable. In a similar way, we rejected or marked as questionable those candidates at
v ∼ 40000–50000 km s−1 due to the sometimes present combination of O iλ1305A and
C iiλ1335A emission lines, although their effect is less pronunced than for Si iv+O iv],
since O i and C ii are not always present. Also, we excluded cases where C iv could
be identified as Si iv. C iv is the most common ion in the region searched, but Si iv
sometimes is present whenever C iv is at the same zabs. We let the software select every
absorption trough and, in the case of broad absorption, we excluded the cases that could
be identified as Si iv. All these exclusions could partly account for the scarcity of detected
absorption lines in certain velocity ranges.
In our sample we found 26 BALs that were strong enough to make continuum
determination and absorption measurement too complicated – we flagged them as BALs
but did not determine their continua or fit any absorption lines.
We then fit every detected C iv absorption line to measure their width (FWHM),
radial velocity centroid (v) and REW. Gaussian line profiles were satisfactory for our
purposes since they produce good measurements of those parameters. Therefore, we
designed IDL software that fit a Gaussian line profile pair, using a Levenberg-Marquardt
least-squares fit, to the C iv doublet absorption lines. Each C iv doublet line was
constrained to have the same FWHM and v, the correct C iv doublet separation
(∆v ∼500 km s−1), and a λ1548.2 : λ1550.77 intensity ratio constrained to the range
1:1 to 2:1 within the noise. In most cases, the Gaussian profile resulted in an excellent fit;
we noted cases where the absorption profile shape deviated from the Gaussian fit such that
the measurements of FWHM and REW were not completely accurate.
51
Most of the detected doublets were narrow enough that the individual lines of
the doublet were not blended with each other, and were not blended with transitions
from absorption at other redshifts. In some cases, the C iv doublets blended with the
intervening doublet Mg ii λλ2796,2803. Thus, we added a tool in the software to fit the
Mg ii doublet simultaneously with the C iv doublet and remove it from the C iv fit. In
the rare case of blending with other ions, we allowed the software to skip the other ion
line. However, the relatively large incidence of C iv absorption, especially at zabs ∼ zem,
occasionally leads to multiple systems blending together. Then, we allowed the software
to fit multiple pairs of Gaussians to the absorption profiles. In some cases, this blending
caused an ambiguity in the number of doublet pairs to use in the fitting. In all cases,
we used the minimum number of doublet pairs “necessary” to reproduce the observed
number of components. Also, we relied, when available, on the presence of other ions with
the same ionization (Si iv, Nv, etc.) at the same redshift to help determine the correct
number of C iv absorption lines within the blends. In the case of narrow components,
“necessary” meant that both lines of the doublet needed to be clearly present. We fit
broad absorption lines blended together with several Gaussians whenever the trough
shape strongly suggested multiple components. To analyze possible de-blending issues, we
included a comment about the cases that we split into several absorption lines but could
be part of blended systems.
This procedure resulted in the measurement of 5321 C iv absorption lines. Figure 3-1
shows the velocity distribution of all C iv absorption. The lower plot shows the number
of quasars contributing to each velocity, which starts to decrease beyond v ∼16000 km
s−1. The large number of narrow absorption lines is mostly due to intervening systems,
but the fraction of intrinsic NALs is significant (e.g., Nestor et al. 2008). The deficit of
absorption at velocities ∼30000 km s−1 and ∼40000-50000 km s−1 is partly due to the
fewer spectra available at those velocity ranges and the aforementioned presence of the
52
Si iv+O iv]λ1400 emission line and the sometimes present combination of O iλ1305A and
C iiλ1335A emission lines, respectively.
Figure 3-1. Top: Distribution of all the absorption systems measured in FWHM-velocityspace (crosses). We have included the cases marked down as questionable aswell (circles). Most of these cases fall around emission line regions, since it isdifficult to decide whether a system is real absorption when it lies between twoclose emission lines. The presence of the Si iv+O iv]λ1400 emission line affectsthe detectability of systems and produces a probably artificial reduction ofC iv absorption at velocities of ∼30000 km s−1. Similar effects, although lessnotorious since they are less abundant, are produced by the O iλ1305A andC iiλ1335A emission lines at ∼40000-50000 km s−1. Bottom: Number ofquasars covering each velocity range. Note that the y-axis ranges upward from500 quasars. Every quasar spectrum covers up to 16000 km s−1, but only halfof them cover up to 60000 km s−1.
Table 3-1 lists the measurement results for every C iv absorption line with FWHM
≥ 600 km s−1. We performed this initial cutoff with the goal of studying outflow systems
and knowing that narrower ones have an uncertain origin. We carried out a statistical
53
study of the absorption lines with FWHM < 600 km s−1 in Nestor et al. (2008). Table
3-1 includes measurements of REW (for C ivλ1548 and C ivλ1550 doublet lines, called
REWλ1548 and REWλ1550 respectively), FWHM, v and zabs as well as magnitude r, zem, BI
and AI, introduced in Chapter 1 and explained in the paragraphs below. Table 3-1 also
includes a column with comments for cases where 1) the C iv absorption identification
is questionable (“q”), 2) the correct location of the continuum fit might be questionable
but the C iv absorption is definitely present (“c”), 3) the Gaussian fitting results in a
poor fit (“f”) and therefore measurements of FWHM and REW are approximate, and 4)
deblending could cause double-counting of absorption (“b”). Figure 3-2 includes examples
of absorption marked with some of these comments.
We also looked for strong Lyα absorption lines at the same redshift as the C iv lines,
which is characteristic of Damped Lyα and Lyman limit systems, at the same redshift
of every C iv absorption line analyzed. Our purpose is merely to exclude them from the
analysis of this chapter since they are not likely to be part of quasar outflows. The 11
cases we found were, however, included in Table 3-1 for future reference. They are labeled
as “d”, when a strong Lyα absorption line was present, or “d2” when the Lyα was present
but not very strong, or zabs ∼< 2.15 so we were not able to inspect the corresponding Lyα
absorption line region, but some other low ionization ions at the same zabs as C iv were
present (Mg ii λλ2796, 2804 and Al ii λ1671, some or all of the iron lines Fe ii λ1608,
2344, 2374, 2383, 2587, 2600 and sometimes Si ii λ1527), which pose some risk of being
a Damped Lyα or Lyman limit system. Cases where only Mg ii or Al iii were present
but no other low ionization ions were detected, and thus the C iv absorption is unlikely
to be part of a Damped Lyα or Lyman limit system, were included in the analysis and
commented in Table 3-1 with the designations “Mg ii” and/or “Al iii”.
Besides the individual absorption characteristics, Table 3-1 includes also some
characteristics of the overall quasar spectra: zem, BI and AI. For zem we include the SDSS
and Nestor et al. (2008) values, when available. We computed measurements for the BI
54
Figure 3-2. Examples of different fits and their comment-codes in Table 3-1. ‘c’ is acandidate where the Continuum fit is debatable but the C iv absorption isreal. ‘f’ is a poor fit that might result in bad measurements of FWHM andREW. ‘b’ is an absorption line that has been deblended and could beconsidered part of a blend with absorption in the proximity.
and AI for each quasar, using the definitions included in the introduction of this chapter.
We allowed for three consecutive instances of noise spikes before resetting the value of C
to 0. When the spectral velocity coverage did not reach 25000(/29000) km s−1, then the
value of BI(/AI) is a lower limit, and the value of BI(/AI) is followed by a “*” in Table
3-1. Note that the zero velocity in BI is defined using the average wavelengths of the
C iv doublet, while in AI it is defined using the longest wavelength line of the doublet:
1550.77 A. We do not include a formal error to either BI or AI because the uncertainties
are dominated by the determination of the continuum. The measurements of BI and AI
depend to a large extent on the continuum placement, and normal differences are expected
55
between our method that uses a cubic spline function, versus those that used templates
derived from composites.
Table 3-2 lists the 26 BALs for which continua were not normalized and therefore we
did not perform any C iv absorption line detection and fitting. They were classified as
BALQSOs with BI larger than 2000 km s−1.
56
Tab
le3-
1.Lis
tof
min
i-B
ALs
Qua
sar
rz e
mz e
mB
IA
Iz a
bs
vFW
HM
RE
Wλ1548
RE
Wλ1550
com
men
t(m
ag)
(Mgii)
(km
s−1)
(km
s−1)
(km
s−1)
(km
s−1)
(A)
(A)
J000
103.
85-1
0463
0.31
18.3
72.
082.
070
769
2.05
2086
1072
2.08
92.
093
J001
710.
86+
1355
56.5
217
.90
1.81
1.81
00
1.82
-113
764
30.
317
0.15
9q
J002
127.
88+
0104
20.2
018
.64
1.82
1.82
454
984
1.79
4170
1698
4.03
04.
037
J002
342.
98+
0102
43.0
018
.44
1.64
1.64
54*
497*
1.57
8063
1958
2.37
71.
194
J002
710.
06-0
9443
5.37
18.2
62.
072.
0882
216
542.
0349
2715
274.
877
4.88
6J0
0350
3.76
+00
1641
.70
17.9
82.
67...
.0
272.
5780
4217
151.
114
0.56
0J0
0461
3.54
+01
0425
.74
18.0
32.
15...
.41
4276
371.
9718
254
2275
2.54
42.
548
c,b
J004
613.
54+
0104
25.7
418
.03
2.15
....
4142
7637
2.01
1373
938
8810
.647
10.6
65c,
bJ0
0461
3.54
+01
0425
.74
18.0
32.
15...
.41
4276
372.
1230
2730
139.
986
8.90
2c,
fJ0
0540
8.46
-094
638.
1517
.78
2.13
2.12
973
1512
2.06
6059
2628
5.35
85.
367
cJ0
0541
9.99
+00
2728
.01
18.3
12.
52...
.11
761
52.
3217
706
1900
1.01
31.
017
cJ0
0541
9.99
+00
2728
.01
18.3
12.
52...
.11
761
52.
4191
3228
452.
453
1.23
5c
J005
951.
67-0
8442
3.88
18.2
22.
142.
150
1011
2.13
1954
828
2.94
52.
884
J011
605.
97+
1334
02.1
718
.32
2.01
2.01
972
2833
1.81
2073
727
244.
496
4.53
5J0
1160
5.97
+13
3402
.17
18.3
22.
012.
0197
228
331.
9916
9918
595.
441
5.45
0c
J012
231.
91+
1339
40.8
418
.24
3.06
....
4667
5356
2.89
1346
039
887.
056
7.39
5b
J012
231.
91+
1339
40.8
418
.24
3.06
....
4667
5356
2.92
1077
820
713.
758
3.76
4b
J012
231.
91+
1339
40.8
418
.24
3.06
....
4667
5356
2.97
6820
774
2.09
51.
294
cJ0
1223
1.91
+13
3940
.84
18.2
43.
06...
.46
6753
562.
9956
7479
72.
246
2.25
0c
J014
809.
65-0
0101
7.84
17.9
52.
162.
170
01.
6948
085
2529
1.13
21.
137
cJ0
2002
2.02
-084
512.
1018
.75
1.94
....
3036
3707
1.86
8693
6072
14.4
317.
237
cJ0
2060
8.63
-080
224.
4718
.84
1.87
1.88
00
1.54
3819
444
685.
765
5.94
5J0
2084
5.54
+00
2236
.07
17.0
81.
891.
900
01.
6823
774
1550
0.61
00.
434
J021
119.
13-0
7572
2.51
17.7
61.
881.
8840
1369
1.80
8625
1876
2.43
01.
217
cJ0
2174
0.97
-085
447.
8218
.21
2.57
....
5031
572.
5424
3933
6012
.554
6.33
7c,
fJ0
2181
8.14
-092
153.
4918
.22
1.88
1.88
1375
2965
1.77
1164
021
412.
485
1.24
5b
J021
818.
14-0
9215
3.49
18.2
21.
881.
8813
7529
651.
7994
2014
491.
525
0.76
4b
57
Tab
le3-
1.C
onti
nued
Qua
sar
rz e
mz e
mB
IA
Iz a
bs
vFW
HM
RE
Wλ1548
RE
Wλ1550
com
men
t(m
ag)
(Mgii)
(km
s−1)
(km
s−1)
(km
s−1)
(km
s−1)
(A)
(A)
J021
818.
14-0
9215
3.49
18.2
21.
881.
8813
7529
651.
8444
8131
236.
966
7.10
7f
J022
036.
27-0
8124
2.90
18.1
82.
00...
.17
9025
111.
8911
208
3036
7.68
87.
701
J022
844.
09+
0002
17.0
818
.22
2.72
....
1463
2057
2.60
9725
3852
8.41
14.
213
cJ0
2422
1.87
+00
4912
.68
18.2
02.
062.
0631
322
721.
8917
411
2300
3.45
93.
473
J024
221.
87+
0049
12.6
818
.20
2.06
2.06
313
2272
2.04
1501
1055
3.68
63.
692
d2J0
2430
4.69
+00
0005
.49
18.4
12.
002.
0052
511
931.
9548
5311
433.
489
3.49
5J0
2493
3.42
-083
454.
4418
.60
2.49
....
1943
82.
4170
0716
462.
448
1.22
7J0
3150
4.51
+00
1237
.38
18.4
21.
781.
7714
207
1.72
5464
837
0.63
30.
634
J031
828.
91-0
0152
3.15
18.0
91.
981.
9990
487
1.63
3850
722
071.
151
1.00
8J0
3182
8.91
-001
523.
1518
.09
1.98
1.99
9048
71.
8514
326
2353
2.89
11.
453
J032
118.
21-0
1053
9.92
18.3
82.
41...
.16
6125
322.
3194
6069
006.
940
6.95
2c
J032
701.
44-0
0220
7.15
18.9
32.
30...
.25
987
12.
1811
135
2914
3.99
22.
008
J033
623.
77-0
6494
7.99
17.7
81.
611.
610*
583*
1.59
2632
2801
2.14
62.
182
J073
300.
91+
3158
23.9
918
.86
3.02
....
3058
6425
2.71
2394
881
3412
.620
6.35
6c,
bJ0
7330
0.91
+31
5823
.99
18.8
63.
02...
.30
5864
252.
7818
371
938
1.19
41.
196
c,b
J073
300.
91+
3158
23.9
918
.86
3.02
....
3058
6425
2.89
9841
2455
7.20
13.
607
dJ0
7330
0.91
+31
5823
.99
18.8
63.
02...
.30
5864
252.
9553
7916
936.
055
3.03
3J0
7334
6.05
+42
1848
.39
17.8
21.
711.
710
944*
1.71
369
1618
4.86
44.
873
c,f
J074
014.
81+
3316
25.8
718
.21
1.87
....
3750
4444
1.71
1705
550
566.
911
6.92
4b
J074
014.
81+
3316
25.8
718
.21
1.87
....
3750
4444
1.74
1412
514
841.
954
1.95
8b
J074
014.
81+
3316
25.8
718
.21
1.87
....
3750
4444
1.76
1096
623
034.
668
2.33
8b
Com
men
tco
des:
‘*’lo
wer
limit
ofB
Ior
AI
valu
ebe
caus
esp
ectr
alco
vera
geen
dsbe
fore
2500
0or
2900
0km
s−1,re
spec
tive
ly,‘q
’qu
esti
onab
leca
se,
‘c’co
ntin
uum
,‘f’th
em
easu
rem
ents
ofFW
HM
and
RE
Wλ1548
and
RE
Wλ1550
mig
htbe
slig
htly
off,‘b
’th
eab
sorp
tion
line
coul
dbe
long
toa
blen
d
ofab
sorp
tion
lines
,‘d
’D
ampe
dLyα
syst
em,‘d
2’po
ssib
leD
ampe
dLyα
syst
em.
58
Table 3-2. List of BALs from SDSS that were not fitQuasar r zem
(mag)J004527.69+143816.19 17.47 1.99J020006.31-003709.91 18.56 2.14J031856.62-060037.67 17.83 1.93J081213.94+431715.99 18.36 1.74J083817.01+295526.56 18.24 2.04J093552.98+495314.31 17.01 1.93J100711.82+053208.92 16.43 2.14J101740.32+401722.32 18.54 2.17J102850.32+511053.11 18.10 2.42J114340.96+520303.35 17.62 1.82J120653.40+492919.29 18.17 1.84J122410.61+101031.12 18.59 1.91J123659.93+460018.27 18.29 1.67J125941.54+633239.34 18.21 1.98J131927.57+445656.55 17.88 2.98J133428.06-012349.01 17.62 1.88J135246.37+423923.59 17.88 2.04J140421.16+633540.60 18.07 2.22J141354.36+044653.61 17.97 1.89J145432.62-015641.22 17.91 1.71J150332.18+364118.05 18.19 3.26J151636.78+002940.51 17.87 2.25J164152.30+305851.72 18.41 2.00J164508.65+442440.31 17.85 1.87J172341.09+555340.57 18.51 2.11J234711.46-103742.43 17.53 1.80
3.4 Mini-BALs
Mini-BALs are the intermediate class between NALs and BALs. Figure 3-3 shows
examples of mini-BALs with a wide range of FWHMs and velocities in non-BALQSOs
(BI=0) and Figure 3-4 displays examples of mini-BALs in BALQSOs. Figure 3-1
illustrated that there is a continuous distribution of absorption lines in widths and
velocities in the studied sample of quasars. The goal of this work is the study of absorbers
that are part of quasar outflows and, to do so, it is necessary to separate the outflows
from intervening systems. As mentioned in Chapter 1, NALs can have several origins:
outflows or intervening absorption, and unfortunately, intervening and outflowing NALs
can present similar appearances and no substantial differences appear between their
distributions (Misawa et al. 2007a), not being able to be distinguished with one time
observation at the SDSS resolution. Only high resolution (Misawa et al. 2007a), variability
59
Figure 3-3. Examples of mini-BALs (underlined by horizontal lines to guide the eye) inquasars with BI=0. The spectra are shifted to their restframe wavelengths.Prominent broad emission lines are labeled accross the top in the upperpanels. Values of FWHM and v (in km s−1) are included at the left bottomcorner of every panel. As seen, mini-BALs show a broad range of velocitiesand widths.
60
Figure 3-4. Examples of mini-BALs (underlined by horizontal lines to guide the eye) inquasars with BI>0 km s−1 (left bottom corner of each plot). Values of FWHMand v (in km s−1) refer to the only mini-BAL in the spectrum or to the onewith the highest v. Note that the mini-BALs can be found by themselves or incombination with BALs, AALs, or other mini-BALs. See Figure 3-3.
61
studies (Narayanan et al. 2004) or statistical approaches (Richards et al. 1999; Richards
et al. 2001; Nestor et al. 2008) can separate them. Due to this limitation, we limit our
study of outflows to mini-BALs and BALs, not being able to include outflowing NALs.
However, gas from clusters of galaxies can produce multiple NALs, which, at the SDSS
resolution, could be confused for a mini-BAL. Therefore, we need a working definition
for mini-BALs that excludes this intervening absorption as well. In this Section we set
an arbitrary threshold as a working definition for mini-BALs, but in §3.5.1 we show how
different values would not affect any of the important conclusions of this study.
We place a conservative lower limit of FWHM > 700 km s−1 for the working
definition of mini-BALs. Studies of rich clusters of galaxies (e.g., Girardi et al. 1998
for galaxies at redshift z < 0.5, Venemans et al. 2007 at larger redshifts), show velocity
dispersions up to ∼1000-1200 km s−1 for the most massive clusters (e.g., Coma and
Coma-like clusters). However, clustering of C iv intervening narrow systems occurs up to
velocities of 600 km s−1 in the rest frame of the absorption (Figure 11 in Sargent et al.
1988), presenting a sharp edge at that velocity and remaining flat beyond that. Also, these
systems would be weak, since intervening absorption lines are very narrow. Although NAL
studies such as Vestergaard (2003) set restrictions on REW to distinguish intervening from
intrinsic systems, we decided not to place any cutoff in REW because that will eliminate
some possibly good candidates. Figure 3-5 shows the distribution, in the FWHM–REW
space, of some of the C iv absorption lines we measured. Any REW typical cut-offs for
NALs (REW>0.3, 0.5 or 1 A) remove absorption lines with FWHM ∼1000-2000 km s−1
that are very likely to be outflows. Therefore, we expect that some intervening systems
might be contaminating our sample but, due to the reasons mentioned above, the effect
should be minimal.
Damped Lyα and Lyman limit systems show, when present, C iv narrow profiles
(FWHM ∼< 400 km s−1 - Prochaska 1999; Wolfe & Prochaska 2000) and the cases we
found with FWHM ≥ 600 km s−1 that might belong to these categories (marked as “d”
62
and “d2” in Table 3-1) are very likely part of blends of narrow lines where we could not
distinguish individual components. Note that, as previously mentioned, we did not include
them in the analysis.
Figure 3-5. Distribution of FWHM vs REWλ1548 of the part of the FWHM-REW space ofthe C iv absorption lines measured. There is a partial correlation betweenFWHM and REW, but any lower limit placed on REW, to eliminate possibleintervening absorption, would exclude broad systems that are very likely to beejected material from the quasar. Therefore, no lower limit for REW was set.
Figure 3-6 shows the distribution of absorption lines with FWHM > 700 km s−1
in 500 km s−1 intervals. The vertical lines in the center of every bar represent the 1 σ
uncertainty from Poisson statistics for the number of absorption lines at that particular
FWHM range.
We also chose an upper limit for FWHM to separate BALs from mini-BALs when
studying their frequency. BALs are most commonly parameterized based on their
Balnicity Index (BI - Weymann et al. 1991, which was introduced in this thesis in
Chapter 1), and not on FWHM. However, as we described there, this definition cannot
be computed beyond v > 25000 km s−1 and thus it cannot quantify systems in that v
63
Figure 3-6. Distribution in FWHM of the C iv absorption lines measured with FWHM≥700 km s−1 in intervals of 500 km s−1. Errors are shown as vertical lines in thecenter of every bar and represent the 1 σ uncertainty from Poisson statisticsfor the number of absorption lines at each particular FWHM range.
region relevant to our study. We selected an upper limit of 3000 km s−1 for the FWHM of
mini-BALs and analyzed them based on BI in the following Section.
In summary, we use a working definition for mini-BALs as absorption features with a
700 < FWHM < 3000 km s−1, and study their frequency and relationship to other classes
of absorbers in the following ection. This working definition is just a fiducial starting
point and in the following Section we also consider what effect would the selection of other
FWHM ranges have on the statistics of mini-BALs.
3.5 Statistics
In this Chapter we will use the following subsamples to maximize the number of
quasars we can use in each analysis:
• Sample A: includes every quasar we were able to measure (2174 quasars).
64
• Sample B: includes every quasar we examined, including those we could not measure(2200 quasars). This sample represents the combination of sample A and the 26BALQSOs with continua that we were not able to fit.
• Sample A2: subset of sample A that includes only quasars with zem ∼> 1.68, whichspectral coverage includes v at least up to 25000 km s−1, allowing for an accuratedefinition of BI (1983 quasars). This sample leaves out the cases with “*” in themeasurement of BI in table 3-1.
• Sample B2: subset of sample B that addresses the same issue as sample A2 (resultingin 2008 quasars). Of the 26 BALQSOs we excluded from the continua and absorptionfitting, 25 cover the region up to 25000 km s−1.
The percentages we include in this study are observed raw fractions of quasars and
not the true fractions of quasars. Our sample of quasars is not complete because we
selected only the brightest ones. Among the brightest SDSS quasars, the fractions of
quasars we present are likely close to true fractions. SDSS quasars are selected using
an i-band magnitude limit, which does not present a problem for quasars with zem ∼<3.5, where all the quasars in our sample lie. The fractions of BALQSOs would be the
most affected since the absorption alters the determination of “true” magnitudes.
Reichard et al. (2003) presented an analysis of the corrections that are applicable in
the case of obtaining the true fraction of BALQSOs. Corrections for color-dependent
selection effects as a function of redshift modified their fraction of High Ionization
BALQSOs (HiBALQSOs) from an uncorrected 14.0%±1.0% to a dust reddening corrected
13.4%±1.2% and dust reddening and extinction corrected 15.9%±1.4%. Note that their
analysis on the dust extinction is an estimation. All these corrections are likely to be
similar or smaller for the fractions of mini-BALs.
We estimate that the sample of C iv absorption has a detection threshold of
REWλ1458 ∼0.2 A for systems with FWHM ∼ 500 km s −1, REWλ1458 ∼0.3 A for
systems with FWHM ∼ 900 km s −1 and REWλ1458 ∼0.4 A for systems with FWHM
∼ 1200 km s−1, although detection threshold depends on the S/N of the spectrum in
question. Most of the candidates close to those limits are marked as questionable (“q”) in
Table 3-1.
65
3.5.1 Statistics of Mini-BALs
We have found 340 C iv mini-BALs, as defined in the previous Section, outflowing at
velocities up to 60000 km s−1, in 237 optically selected quasars with 1.6≤ zem ≤3.5 out
of the total of 2174 spectra we analyzed (sample A). We find mini-BALs in 11.4%±0.9%
quasars of the sample. No previous work has attempted to find the fraction of quasars
with mini-BALs in their spectra. Hall et al. (2002) and most recently Trump et al. (2006)
have computed AI, a more inclusive definition of the BI (see Chapter 1), over SDSS quasar
spectra, however it is an integral measurement that cannot completely characterize the
absorption.
In Figures 3-3 and 3-4 we showed that sometimes there are more than one mini-BAL
per quasar. Consequently, we present the results of (a) the number of mini-BALs per
quasar, which allows counting several mini-BALs in one quasar spectrum (Figures 3-7 and
3-8) and (b) the fraction of quasars with at least one mini-BAL at a velocity < v, which
counts only the highest-velocity mini-BAL per quasar spectrum (Figure 3-9).
Figure 3-7 shows the number of C iv mini-BALs per quasar in a particular velocity
range (per 5000 km s−1). Because not every spectrum in our sample of quasars covers
the entire velocity range (see Figure 3-1), we normalized each velocity bin by the
number of quasars available at every range. To include a quasar and a mini-BAL in
a velocity range it must cover at least 95% of that velocity bin. The three different
colors/symbols represent the number of mini-BALs per quasar in 1) all quasars from
sample A (black/squares), 2) quasars with BI < 1000 from sample B (red/diamonds), and
3) quasars with BI =0 from sample B (green/circles). The errors (vertical bars) represent
the 1 σ uncertainty from Poisson statistics for the number of systems per v interval. The
bins beyond 30000 km s−1 are in bins of width 10000 km s−1 in order to increase the
number of systems per bin and thus decrease the error bars. However, these bins still
represent the number of mini-BALs per 5000 km s−1 and therefore, are quantitatively
comparable to the others in the plot. From Figure 3-7 we can read, for example, that there
66
are 0.020±0.003 mini-BALs per quasar (2.0±0.3 per hundred of quasars) with a velocity
between 20000 and 25000 km s−1, and 0.007±0.002 mini-BALs per non-BALQSO in the
same velocity range.
Figure 3-7. Number of mini-BALs (700<FWHM<3000 km s−1) per quasar in velocityspace. The three different symbols show the mini-BALs in spectra from sampleA (black/squares), the mini-BALs in spectra with BI < 1000 from sample B(red/diamonds) and the mini-BALs in spectra with with BI = 0 from sampleB (green/circles). The horizontal width of each histogram segment indicatesthe size of the velocity bins. The vertical bars are the 1 σ uncertainties basedon counting statistics for the number of systems in that bin. The horizontallocation of each error bar marks the average velocity of all the mini-BALs inthat bin. Beyond 30000 km s−1 the bins have widths of 10000 km s−1 but stillrepresent the number of mini-BALs per 5000 km s−1.
Figure 3-8 shows the same results as in Figure 3-7 if we select other FWHM
restrictions to define what constitutes a mini-BAL. The results do not change significantly
and the shape of the distributions of the number of mini-BALs per quasar with velocity
is approximately equivalent. We selected: a) 600 < FWHM < 3000 km s−1 to show the
effects of being less cautious in the limit between intervening and outflowing absorbers, b)
900 < FWHM < 3000 km s−1 to display the effects of being more cautious in that limit,
67
and c) 700 < FWHM < 2000 km s−1 to illustrate the effects of excluding systems that are
more likely to contribute towards the value of BI (the “C” parameter in the BI definition
(see Chapter 1) starts counting when absorption troughs become wider than 2000 km s−1).
Figure 3-8. Number of mini-BALs with 600<FWHM<3000 km s−1, 900<FWHM<3000km s−1, and 700<FWHM<2000 km s−1, per quasar in velocity space. SeeFigure 3-7 for more information.
Table 3-3 includes some of the results for the number of mini-BALs per hundred of
quasars (as in Figures 3-7 and 3-8 although multiplied by 100) in several velocity ranges:
all, low velocity (from -5000 to 25000 km s−1), and high velocity (from 25000 to 60000 km
s−1). The errors, as in Fig. 3-7 and 3-8, are 1 σ uncertainties from Poission statistics for
68
Table 3-3. Number x 100 of mini-BALs per quasar.
velocity range (km/s) sample BI 700-3000 600-3000 900-3000 700-2000-5000-60000 A (1983) all 15.5±0.8 16.4±0.9 14.2±0.8 10.9±0.7
“ A2 (1888) <1000 10.5±0.7 11.8±0.8 9.5±0.7 7.5±0.6“ A2 (1783) 0 5.4±0.5 6.4±0.6 4.8±0.5 4.0±0.5
-5000-25000 A (1983) all 12.9±0.8 13.6±0.8 11.8±0.7 9.3±0.7” A2 (1888) <1000 8.2±0.7 9.4±0.7 7.4±0.6 6.2±0.6” A2 (1783) 0 3.4±0.4 4.2±0.5 2.8±0.4 2.9±0.4
25000-60000 A (1983) all 2.5±0.4 2.5±0.4 2.2±0.3 1.4±0.3” A2 (1888) <1000 2.1±0.3 2.2±0.4 2.0±0.3 1.2±0.3” A2 (1783) 0 1.8±0.3 1.9±0.3 1.8±0.3 1.0±0.2
the number of systems in that v interval. For example, Table 3-3 includes that there are
15.5±0.8 mini-BALs at any v per hundred sample quasars.
Figure 3-9 shows the fraction of quasars with at least one mini-BAL. It includes a)
the fraction of quasars that have at least one mini-BAL at velocity “< v” (upper plots)
and b) the fraction of quasars with at least one mini-BAL outflowing at a velocity from
25000 km s−1 to v (lower plots). In these cases we have used only the basic working
definition for mini-BALs (700 < FWHM < 3000 km s−1). The color coding represents
the same three samples of all quasars, BI < 1000, and BI = 0, as in Figure 3-7. Dotted
lines represent the errors. Only quasars that cover up to 95% of each velocity range are
included. These fractions of quasars are not monotonically increasing functions because
the number of quasars in the samples diminishes after ∼17000 km s−1.
Table 3-4 summarizes some of the results of the fraction of quasars with mini-BALs
for the basic working definition (700 < FWHM < 3000 km s−1) at several velocity
ranges from Figure 3-9. For example, we find that there are 11.4%±0.9% quasars with a
mini-BAL at any v. If we only select quasars with BI=0, there are 5.1% of them that show
a mini-BAL at any velocity. As expected, the results are smaller than in Table 3-3 because
we are counting only one mini-BAL per quasar spectrum. Doing so avoids the problem of
double-counting and deblending stated in §3.3.
Overall, Figures 3-7–3-9 and accompanying Tables 3-3–3-4 show that there is a
significant number of mini-BALs in our sample of quasars, independent of the FWHM
69
Figure 3-9. Fractions of quasars with at least one mini-BAL outflowing at velocity ”< v”(upper plots) and at a velocity from 25000 km s−1 to v (lower plots). SeeFigure 3-7 for more information on the color coding.
Table 3-4. Fractions of quasars with mini-BALs (700<FWHM<3000 km s−1).
velocity range (km/s) sample BI %-5000-60000 A (1983) all 11.4±0.9
“ A2 (1888) <1000 9.2±0.9“ A2 (1783) 0 5.1±0.7
-5000-25000 A (1983) all 9.9±0.7“ A2 (1888) <1000 7.0±0.6“ A2 (1783) 0 3.3±0.4
25000-60000 A (1983) all 2.6±0.5“ A2 (1888) <1000 2.3±0.4“ A2 (1783) 0 2.1±0.4
range used to select them. We have found that there are 15.5±0.8 mini-BALs per every
hundred sample quasars, and that 11.4%±0.9% of quasars have a mini-BAL outflowing at
any v. We have shown their distribution in velocities, where it can be seen that they cover
up to 60000 km s−1, the limit of this study. Although the majority of mini-BALs lie in
the velocity region 0-25000 km s−1, there is a significant number of mini-BALs outflowing
at higher velocities. There is a strong connection between the mini-BAL and the BAL
70
phenomenon and we will discuss the percentages of mini-BALs in quasars with different
values of BI in §3.5.2.
3.5.2 Relation between Mini-BALs and BALs
In this section we explore how frequently mini-BALs appear in BALQSOs versus
in non-BALQSOs. BALQSOs are defined as those with BI>0 and non-BALQSOs as
those with BI = 0 (see Chapter 1). Our study finds an observed fraction of 10.7%±0.7%
BALQSOs out of the quasars in sample B, whereas 5.7%±0.5% have BI > 1000, and
4.2%±0.4% have BI > 2000. We estimate that all of the 26 unanalyzed BALQSOs have BI
> 2000. Previous studies also based on SDSS samples and BI measurements find similar
percentages. Reichard et al. (2003) found an observed fraction of 14.0%±1.0% BALQSOs
out of a sample of 3814 quasars with 1.7 ≤ zem ≤ 4.2. Trump et al. (2006), improving the
continuum fitting technique and enlarging the sample to 16883 quasars with 1.7 ≤ zem ≤4.38, reported a BALQSO observed fraction of 10.4%±0.2%. Besides the differences
in redshift coverage with our sample, both works rely on the use of templates to place
the continuum, while we fit pseudo-continua with a spline function for the underlying
continuum and Gaussians for the broad emission lines. Nonetheless, the value obtained by
Trump et al. (2006) and ours coincide within the error.
As Figures 3-3, 3-4 and 3-7-3-9 illustrate, mini-BALs are present in both BALQSOs
and non-BALQSOs. In Figure 3-7 we showed the number of mini-BALs in all quasars,
quasars with BI<1000 and quasars with BI=0. Because we find more than one mini-BAL
in some quasar spectra we also present separately the fraction of quasars with, at least, a
mini-BAL at velocity < v.
Figure 3-10 summarizes some of our results on the fraction of quasars with at least
one mini-BAL at a velocity < v from Figure 3-9 and Table 3-9, and compares them to
the fraction of BALQSOs with different values of BI. Figure 3-10, in the same fashion
as Figure 3-9, includes the fraction of quasars with three different cutoffs of BI: any BI,
BI<1000 and BI=0. All of the percentages of fractions of quasars with mini-BALs are
71
Figure 3-10. Left panel: The plot shows the percentages of different types of quasars (all,quasars with BI<1000 and non-BALQSOs) with at least one mini-BALoutflowing at velocities up to v = 25000 km s−1 or from v > 25000 to 60000km s−1. Right panel: Percentages of quasars with BIs in different ranges.The total fraction of BALQSOs we find is 10.7%±0.7%.
derived from sample A2, except the percentage of mini-BALs in all quasars (any BI), that
is derived from sample A. For the BALs, all of these percentages are derived from sample
B2 since we need good values of BI. Figure 3-10 shows the percentage of quasars with
a mini-BAL split in two velocity ranges: at speeds v <25000 km s−1 and v >25000 km
s−1. Note again that, in fair comparison, the BI definition only integrates absorption with
velocities up to 25000 km s−1 and so we have separated the mini-BALs into those with
lower and higher velocities.
Our working definition of mini-BALs does not include absorption lines with FWHM
> 3000 km s−1 because at v < 25000 km s−1 they highly contribute to the value of BI
and are considered BALs if the absorption trough is deep enough. However, the BI only
72
Figure 3-11. Percentages of absorption lines with FWHM>3000 km s−1 per quasar per5000 km s−1 bin in velocity space. See Fig. 3-7 for information on what thedifferent symbols represent. The arrows indicate that these values are lowerlimits since we are not including the 26 BALQSOs that we did not analyze.
covers up to 25000 km s−1 and thus absorption lines with FWHM > 3000 km s−1 at
higher velocities belong to an ‘absorption limbo’: they do not count towards BI and are
not included in the mini-BAL working definition. Figure 3-11 shows the distribution with
velocity of absorption lines with FWHM > 3000 km s−1 per quasar. There are 0.8±0.2%
absorption lines with FWHM > 3000 km s−1 per non-BALQSO outflowing at v > 25000
km s−1. We use sample A for the ‘all’ cases and sample A2 for the cases with BI<1000
and BI=0; note that the number of absorption lines in all quasars do not include the
non-measured BALQSOs, which is symbolized by the arrows in that result.
Mini-BALs are not just part of BAL absorption troughs, and they represent a part
of the FWHM–velocity space of quasar outflows that has barely been studied before.
There are 0.155±0.008 mini-BALs at any velocity per quasar and 0.054±0.005 mini-BALs
outflowing at any velocity per nonBALQSO. We find that the difference between the
number of mini-BALs per quasar in all quasars versus in non-BALQSOs is larger at
73
lower velocities (0.129±0.008 in all quasars versus 0.034±0.004 in non-BALQSOs), while
mini-BALs with v > 25000 km s−1 are more common in non-BALQSOs (0.025%±0.004%
in all quasars versus 0.018%±0.003% in non-BALQSOs). This trend suggests that the
presence of absorption at low velocities tends to not be accompanied by high-velocity
absorption; in other words, that the probability of finding a mini-BAL at v > 25000 km
s−1 is independent of the presence of BALs at lower velocities. However, we must note
that we might be underestimating the presence of C iv at high velocities in spectra where
C iv is also present at low velocities because of the possible confusion with Si iv. Also,
because we find more than one mini-BAL in some quasar spectra, we have presented
separately the fraction of quasars with, at least, a mini-BAL at velocity < v. We find
that 11.4%±0.9% quasars have at least one mini-BAL at any velocity, noting that almost
half of them, 5.1%±0.7%, are non-BALQSOs. The majority of quasars with a mini-BAL
outflowing at v ≥ 25000 km s−1 are non-BALQSOs (2.1%±0.4% in non-BALQSOs versus
2.6±0.5% in all quasars).
3.5.3 Relation between Mini-BALs and AALs
In this section we explore whether there is a connection between the presence of
mini-BALs and associated absorption lines (AALs - see Chapter 1). Figures 3-3 and 3-4
show several examples of quasar spectra where both mini-BALs and AALs are present.
We now specify what we would consider AALQSOs. First of all, we exclude
BALQSOs from consideration. The non-BALQSOs (1783 quasars with BI = 0) are
selected from sample A2 because an accurate limit on BI is necessary. Associated
absorption systems are usually defined as those that have velocities up to 5000 km s−1
relative to the systemic redshift (Foltz et al. 1986); we use this value as an upper limit
for their velocity. Because the statistical error in the determination of the zero velocity is
based on the SDSS systemic redshift, we include systems down to -1000 km s−1. Following
Vestergaard (2003), Nestor et al. (2008) and Fox et al. (2008), we exclude weak AALs
74
because they are more likely to be intervening. We use a cutoff of REWλ1548 ≥ 0.3.
Finally, we did not restrict the value of FWHM.
Of the quasars in sample A2 that are non-BALQSOs (1783), 26.2%±1.2% are
AALQSOs set by the above criteria: non-BALQSO with at least one absorption line at
-1000< v <5000 km s−1 and REWλ1548 ≥0.3. Note that in Nestor et al. (2008) we reported
a fraction of 25% AALQSOs, but in Nestor et al. (2008) we included only absorption with
FWHM < 600 km s−1, and in the current analysis we have not set any restrictions in
FWHM. Vestergaard (2003) reported a fraction of 27% AALQSOs, but their restrictions
in v and REW were slightly different.1 Vestergaard (2003) also includes the fractions of
AALQSOs with other REW constraints (e.g., 25% with REW ≥ 1 A).
Nestor et al. (2008) carried out a statistical analysis which found an excess (larger
than 60%) of, very likely, outflowing narrow absorption, among associated absorption,
with velocities between 1800 and 4400 km s−1 blueshifted relative to the quasar systemic
velocity. We use this range as well since it seems to include systems that are more likely to
be outflowing AALs than the velocity cutoff mentioned above.
Figure 3-12 shows the normalized distribution in velocity of the number of mini-BALs
with v > 5000 km s−1 in AALQSOs and non-AALQSOs in different velocity bins, in the
same fashion as explained for Figure 3-7 in §3.5.1. It includes the results for both velocity
cutoffs to select AALQSOs: -1000 < v < 5000 km s−1 and 1800 < v < 4400 km s−1.
The lack of mini-BALs in both AALQSOs and non-AALQSOs with v < 5000 km s−1
is a consequence of our decision to exclude those cases in this study so they cannot be
double-counted as mini-BAL and AAL. However, the absence of mini-BALs with v >
40000 km s−1 in AALQSOs is possibly real.
In Table 3-5 we include the number of AALQSOs and non-AALQSOs based on the
two sets of constraints described above and the number of them that includes a mini-BAL
1 |v| ≤ 5000 km s−1 and total REW of the C iv doublet ≥ 0.5 A.
75
Figure 3-12. Number of mini-BALs outflowing at v > 5000 km s−1 per AALQSO (solidblack line/ open square) and non-AALQSO (dashed red line/ filled diamond)where AALQSOs are selected as non-BALQSOs that include absorption lineswith REW ≥ 0.3 and left panel: velocities from -1000 to 5000 km s−1, andright panel: velocities from 1800 to 4400 km s−1.
outflowing at v > 5000 km s−1, as shown in Figure 3-12. We include values for several
velocity ranges. The errors are 1 σ Poisson statistics.
Table 3-5. Numbers of AALQSOs and non-AALQSOs (both BI = 0) that include amini-BAL.
velocity range (km/s) sample % of quasars with Mini-BALs-1000< v <5000 km s−1 AALQSOs (468) 4.3±1.0-1000< v <5000 km s−1 non-AALQSOs (1315) 3.3±0.51800< v <4400 km s−1 AALQSOs (185) 6.0±1.8
There are 66 non-BALQSOs with a mini-BAL outflowing at v > 5000 km s−1 and
21 of them are in AALQSOs. The fraction of quasars with mini-BALs that are also
AALQSOs (32%±7%) is slightly larger than the percentage of AALQSOs in the total
sample of non-BALQSOs (26.0%±1.2%), but this difference is not significant because it
lies within the errors.
As Figure 3-12 and Table 3-5 show, although the total percentages of mini-BALs
in AALQSOs and in non-AALQSOs are similar (within the errors) when computed
over the whole velocity space, their velocity distributions differ. In particular, there are
76
not mini-BALs in AALQSOs outflowing at velocities larger than 40000 km s−1. If we
consider only AALs in the velocity range 1800 < v < 4400 km s−1 we find a slightly larger
percentage of AALQSOs with mini-BALs.
3.5.4 Relation between C iv Mini-BALs and Mg ii Absorption
We visually inspected every quasar with C iv absorption broader than 500 km s−1
and every quasar with associated absorption to search for Mg ii λλ2796,2804 absorption
at similar velocities. The samples searched were construed to have zem < 2.25 so Mg ii
lies within the spectral wavelength range and 1) C iv absorption with FWHM > 500
km s−1 (271 quasars, subset of sample B) and/or 2) associated absorption as defined in
section §3.5.3 (343 quasars, subset of sample A2). Also, out of sample of 271 quasars that
presented absorption with FWHM > 500 km s−1, we created another subset that includes
only quasars with mini-BALs (175 quasars). We did not perform continuum fitting across
the Mg ii wavelengths. Assessing the presence of Mg ii absorption at the same velocities
as C iv became a difficult task due to the presence of Fe ii lines in the shortward of the
Mg ii emission line, which makes it difficult to decide whether there is absorption or there
are two emission lines side by side, producing a false absorption effect. Note that we are
not including either the “d” or “d2” in Table 3-1 since they are Damped Lyα systems or
likely to be them, respectively.
Figure 3-13 shows some examples of cases where we find Mg ii absorption at the
same v as C iv. All of the Mg ii systems we find in this search are either 1) BALs, where
the Mg ii was broad but narrower and weaker than C iv, or 2) associated lines, where
in most cases the Mg ii absorption appeared strong. In the cases where a C iv BAL is
accompanied by Mg ii, this absorber was sometimes outflowing at lower velocities than the
C iv absorber, which has been previously reported (i.e., Weymann et al. 1991; Voit et al.
1993).
We do not find any Mg ii absorption accompanying C iv mini-BALs in the 175 quasar
spectra analyzed. Since we have not normalized the continuum around the Mg ii emission
77
Figure 3-13. Examples of Mg ii (lower panels) outflowing with C iv (upper panels).Vertical dashed lines are situated approximately where the left side of theMg ii doublet would fall to guide the eye. Left panels: C iv BAL with itscorresponding Mg ii mini-BAL. Because Mg ii absorption in outflows seem tobe weaker than their relative C iv ones, only in strong broad BALs we areable to detect obvious Mg ii mini-BALs in the same outflow. Right panels:3 different systems (from left to right): a) a C iv mini-BAL with nocorrespondent Mg ii b) a very likely Damped Lα system with strong MgIIabsorption (among other low ionization lines) and weak C iv, and c) strongassociated C iv absorption with very weak Mg ii.
78
line region, we cannot completely discard the existence of Mg ii absorption together with
C iv mini-BALs. However, if present, Mg ii would be very weak. Whenever strong C iv
BALs are accompanied by Mg ii, the latter is always weaker (see Figure 3-13), which
is also reported in Voit et al. (1993). This tendency suggests that, if present, the Mg ii
absorption at the same v as C iv mini-BALs might be even weaker and difficult to detect
without a proper continuum fitting.
We find that 9.0%±1.5% of C iv AALs with zem <2.25 also present Mg ii (37 out of
410). We obtained approximately the same percentage (9%±2%, 15 out of 160) selecting
only those quasars with 1800< v <4400 km s−1 (see §3.5.3). C iv BALQSOs included
Mg ii absorption in their spectra in 7.0%±1.9% of cases (13 out of 187). As mentioned
above, the estimated fraction of quasars with C iv mini-BALs that present Mg ii is 0% (0
out of 175).
3.5.5 Relation between C iv Mini-BALs and Radio Properties
In this section we study the radio properties of quasars with absorption broader
than 500 km s−1. Originally BALQSOs were thought to be radio quiet objects (Stocke
et al. 1992 - hereafter S92; de Kool 1993). However, since then, many cases of radio-loud
BALQSOs have been found (e.g., Brotherton et al. 1998; Becker et al. 2000; Menou et al.
2001; Brotherton et al. 2005; McGreer et al. 2006). In order to investigate possible trends
between quasars with outflows and their radio properties we have cross-correlated our
sample of quasars with the Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty cm survey (FIRST;
Becker et al. 1995). Out of the initial 2200 quasars (sample B), 259 of these are FIRST
detected (FIRST detection threshold is 1mJy), having a matching radio source within 10”,
1758 were non-detected, while the remainder were not covered by FIRST. All of the 2017
quasar detections except for 14 lie within 2” of the SDSS position, and whenever there
were several matches for one source, we selected the closest one to the SDSS coordinates.
79
In order to define whether the FIRST detected quasars are radio-loud or radio-quiet,
we use the parameter R∗ (Sramek & Weedman 1980) that is a relative measurement of the
radio flux at 5 Ghz versus the optical flux at 2500 A:
log R∗ = log f(5GHz)− log f(2500A). (3–1)
The radio flux at 5 GHz can be defined in terms of the FIRST peak flux Sν (in
mJy/beam), the frequency ν (1.4 GHz), the radio spectral slope αrad, which we assumed
to be 0.3 for every quasar following Sramek & Weedman (1980), and the SDSS systemic
redshift zem. We use the formula introduced in Sramek & Weedman (1980):
log f(5GHz) = −29.0 + log(Sν) + αrad log[5/ν]− (1 + αrad) log(1 + zem). (3–2)
In order to define the optical flux at 2500 A, we do not consider appropriate the use
of the filter-B magnitude (centered at 4361 A) for our sample, since the majority of the
quasars in our sample have a redshift zem ∼ 2. This redshift places the C iv emission line
at ∼ 4650 A, contaminating the B-magnitude value with absorption and emission. Instead
we derived log f(2500 A) from the SDSS r-magnitudes (centered at 6122 A):
log f(2500A) = −22.83− 0.4rc, (3–3)
where rc is the r SDSS magnitude corrected from Galactic extinction2 , and a spectral
index, αopt, of -1 (fν ∝ ν−αopt) is used.
Stocke et al. (1992) divided radio-loud and radio-quiet QSOs at zem ≈ 2 as having
log R∗ larger or smaller than unity, respectively, and we use the same criteria. Figure 3-14
shows the distribution of radio sources among the absorbers with FWHM > 500 km s−1
2 using extinctions from http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/DUST.
80
Figure 3-14. FWHM–velocity–(radio properties) space of C iv absorption lines with 500 <FWHM < 5000 km/s. FIRST detections are shown as circles. Clear circlesare absorption in radio-loud quasars and filled circles in radio-quiet quasars.The radius of the circles is proportional to
√log R∗. Crosses represent the
FIRST non-detections, which include 16 SDSS sources that the FIRSTcatalog did not cover. No trend between FWHM, velocity and radioproperties is apparent.
in FWHM–velocity space (for sample A). The crosses represent FIRST non-detections.
Circles represent FIRST detections: filled circles are radio-quiet detections and clear
circles are radio-loud. The radii of the circles are proportional to√
log R∗. Some of
the radio-quiet sources could be called “radio-moderate” (Becker et al. 1997), since the
majority of them have values of log R∗ between 0.3-0.9. As we show in Figure 3-15, all
of the FIRST non-detections, if detected, will be radio quiet. The velocity and FWHM
distributions of C iv absorption in radio-loud quasars seem similar to the distributions of
81
C iv absorption in radio-quiet sources, and we do not find any significant trend, with the
exception of finding that the strongest radio-loud sources in our sample (log R∗ ≥ 2) are
all non-BALQSOs with associated and low velocity systems (within v < 7000 km s−1 from
the systemic velocity).
Figure 3-15 shows radio-loudness (log R∗) versus quasar Balnicity Index for the
quasars in the same sample as those in Figure 3-14. Symbols have same meaning as in
Figure 3-14 except for the arrows that represent upper limits for sources that FIRST
covered but were not detected (the top of the arrow is placed at the upper limit of the
log R∗ value, derived from a Sν =0.9 mJy/beam, a little bit below the FIRST detection
limit of 1 mJy). Inspection of Figure 3-15 suggests gaps of radio loudness for certain
Balnicity Indexes: none of the quasars with BI between 200 and 1400 are radio-loud (0 out
of 58), while 12% (6 out of 50) of the quasars with 0 < BI < 200 and 12% (7 out of 59) of
the quasars with 1400 < BI < 4200 are. Another gap appears beyond a BI of 4200 (0 out
of 16).
We find that out of the 2017 quasars in this study covered by FIRST, 8.9%±0.7%
are radio-loud. Of the quasars with absorption lines with FWHM ≥ 500 km s−1 in
sample B, there are 7.5%±1.5% radio-loud sources. Of these ones, whereas 8%±2%
of the non-BALQSOs are radio-loud, 6.8%±1.8 of BALQSOs are radio-loud. In the
case of quasars with mini-BALs, we also find that 7.4%±1.8% of them are radio-loud,
approximately the same percentage as those from BALQSOs and quasars with mini-BALs
combined (7.1%±1.5%).
3.6 Discussion
We have performed the first complete inventory of all C iv absorption lines in a
sample of 2200 bright SDSS quasars at redshifts 1.6 ≤ zem ≤ 3.5. Our main goals are to
1) examine the velocity distribution of the absorption lines relative to the quasar systemic
redshift (see also Nestor et al. 2008), and 2) identify individual outflow lines and candidate
outflow lines for statistical analysis and follow-up studies. We are particularly interested
82
Figure 3-15. Radio loudness versus Balnicity Index of the quasars with absorption inFigure 3-14. FIRST detections are shown as circles. Clear circles representabsorption in radio-loud quasars and filled circles in radio-quiet quasars. Theradius of the circles is proportional to
√log R∗. Arrows represent the FIRST
non-detections where the top of the arrow is placed at the upper limit(Sν =0.9 mJy/beam). Crosses at the bottom of the Figure are the 16 SDSSsources that the FIRST catalog did not cover.
in outflow features that are underrepresented in previous work, namely, mini-BALs and
high velocity systems with v > 25000 km s−1. All this information can be supplemented
by previous results based on integrated absorption measurements, such as BI and AI.
Our quasar sample selects the brightest objects, and therefore it is not complete.
We have selected several subsamples to maximize the statistical results of the different
studies we have carried out (see §3.5). The results we derive are observed raw fractions
of quasars and not the true fractions of quasars, because we have not performed dust
reddening or extinction corrections. Reichard et al. (2003) analyzes these effects for a
sample of BALQSOs, which are expected to be the most affected by absorption extinction.
83
Their corrections modify the raw fraction of BALQSOs by less than 2%. Note that for
SDSS quasars with zem ∼< 3.5, as every quasar in our sample, these fractions do not need
to be corrected by the absorption trough since SDSS quasars are selected using the i-band
magnitude limit.
We present, for the first time, the number of mini-BALs expected per quasar
spectrum. We have attempted to exclude intervening absorption that, at the SDSS
resolution, could appear similar to mini-BALs. To do so, we introduce a working definition
that selects mini-BALs as absorption lines with FWHMs larger than 700 km s−1. By using
a FWHM cutoff of 700 - 3000 km s−1, we find that there are 15.5±0.8 mini-BALs per
hundred quasars. We have also reported the frequency of absorption with other possible
FWHM selections, which resulted in similar results. We have presented their distribution
in velocity (Fig. 3-7 and 3-8) in all quasars, non-BALQSOs and quasars with BI < 1000
km s−1. Because some quasar spectra include more than one mini-BAL, and in order to
avoid double-counting, we also have computed the fraction of quasars with at least one
mini-BAL at any velocity, finding that 11.4%±0.9% of quasars have at least one mini-BAL
at any velocity.
The mini-BAL phenomenon is strongly related to BALQSOs. Approximately 7% of
the quasars in sample A2 are BALQSOs that also include a mini-BAL at v < 25000 km
s−1. Our quasar sample includes 10.7%±0.7% BALQSOs, which are defined to have BI >
0. Other studies based also on SDSS quasar samples find similar percentages: Trump et al.
(2006) finds 10.4%±0.2% BALQSOs, and Reichard et al. (2003) reports a raw fraction of
14.0%±1.0%. Previous studies in other samples of optically selected quasars also reported
fractions similar to these values; i.e., Hewett & Foltz (2003) reported a non-corrected
fraction of 15%±3% BALQSOs in the Large Bright Quasar Survey (LBQS), however this
result is not directly comparable to ours since they take into account, not only BI, but
also the probability of a quasar of being a BALQSO (P ). Using their number of BALQSOs
within the range 1.5 ≤ zem ≤ 3.0 and magnitude interval 16.50-18.85, they obtain a
84
fraction of 10.7%±1.7%. From the perspective of computing the total fraction of quasars
with any kind of outflows, the percentage of BALQSOs with mini-BALs is included in the
above fraction of BALQSOs and therefore we will not include it hereafter.
Mini-BALs are also part of two regions of the outflow parameter space that have
been sparsely surveyed before: non-BALQSOs and high velocity systems. We have found
that mini-BALs are present, at any velocity, in 5.1%±0.7% of non-BALQSOs. If we select
only those that are found at v < 25000 km s−1, we still find mini-BALs in 3.4%±0.4% of
non-BALQSOs. At larger velocities (25000 km s−1 < v ∼< 0.2c), 2.5%±0.4% of the quasars
of any type, not only BALQSOs, show at least one mini-BAL. Most of the mini-BALs
at these velocities appear in non-BALQSOs. The study of these high velocity outflows is
necessary because it may help to constrain the acceleration mechanisms that have been
proposed to drive them outside of the SMBH environment.
Mini-BALs are not the only type of absorption barely studied in previous surveys.
We also have found broad absorption that has not been included in any of the previous
categories. Traditionally BALQSO definitions based on BI measured over the C iv
short-ward wavelength range have been limited to a velocity of 25000 km s−1 in order
to avoid confusing it with Si iv absorption, and no other comprehensive studies have
been carried out beyond this velocity. Consequently, we also investigated the frequency
of absorption lines with FWHM > 3000 km s−1. Figure 3-11 shows the distribution in
velocity of these absorption lines, which at v > 25000 km s−1 are present in 0.8%±0.2% of
non-BALQSOs. Mini-BALs are therefore more common at very high velocities than wider
absorption lines, but both mini-BALs and broader absorption seem to reach the maximum
terminal velocities of this study (∼ 0.2c). Excluding those that include also mini-BALs
in their spectra, there are 0.4%±0.2% non-BALQSOs with these broad absorbers, and
together with the fraction of mini-BALs, we obtain a fraction of ∼ 5.5% non-BALQSOs
with outflows. This fraction can be added to the fraction of BALQSOs resulting in a
85
fraction of ∼ 16% quasars with mini-BALs and broad absorption, which are presumably
quasar outflows.
The frequency of AALQSOs in our sample is 26.2%±1.2% of the non-BALQSOs.
In Nestor et al. (2008) we reported the AALQSO frequency when including only the
absorption lines with FWHM < 600 km s−1 (25%). These fractions are comparable to
results of other quasar studies at similar redshifts (Vestergaard 2003 - 27%±5%, Misawa
et al. 2007a - 23%), and even with quasars at lower redshifts (Ganguly et al. 2001, found
25%±6% from 59 quasars at zem < 1), although these comparisons between different
samples are non-trivial because of the heterogenous definitions of what AALs are. Our
analysis of AALs was derived from the sample of non-BALQSOs, and is thus independent
of the frequency of BALs. We have not found a solid relationship between the presence of
mini-BALs in either AALQSOs or in non-AALQSOs. Mini-BALs outflowing at v > 5000
km s−1 appear in 5% of AALQSOs, whereas they are present in 3% of non-AALQSOs.
However, the distribution in velocity of the mini-BALs in AALQSOs seems to be more
concentrated than in non-AALQSOs, as we do not find mini-BALs with v > 40000 km
s−1 in AALQSOs, although mini-BALs occur at those velocities in non-AALQSOs. The
fraction of quasars with AALs that have not been included in the previous fractions (i.e.,
those which not include a mini-BAL or BAL at any velocity) is 25%. Although it is known
that most AALs are part of the host galaxy-AGN environment, it is unclear whether
AALs are ejected material or already part of the host galaxy. In Nestor et al. (2008) we
reported an excess of narrow absorption lines blue-shifted with respect to the quasar
systemic velocity, and therefore likely to be intrinsic to the quasar outflow phenomenon.
Wise et al. (2004) reported that ≥ 20% of a sample of 19 C iv AALs are intrinsic to
the quasar central engine based on time-variability studies and Misawa et al. (2007a)
obtained a larger fraction (∼ 33%) based on partial coverage of a sample of 37 quasars.
Assuming that all the AALQSOs in our study include outflowing AALs, we can add it to
the outflows tally, obtaining ∼ 41% quasars with outflows.
86
Besides AALs, several studies have found that higher velocity NALs might also be
part of outflows. Richards et al. (1999) and Richards et al. (2001) found large fractions
(36%) of non-intervening narrow absorption lines at v ∼ 5000 - 55000 km s−1 based
on correlations with quasar intrinsic radio properties of their sample. By studying
high-velocity NALs on a one-on-one basis, Misawa et al. (2007a) reported that 10-17%
of non-associated C iv NAL systems with v ∼ 5000 - 70000 km s−1 show partial coverage,
characteristic of non-intervening absorption. Note that both percentages are not in conflict
since partial coverage is a signature but not a requirement of quasar outflowing nature,
and therefore the result reported by Misawa et al. (2007a) might be included in the
Richards et al. (1999) percentage. As noticed in Ganguly & Brotherton (2008), this is not
the fraction of quasars hosting these outflows but the fraction of intrinsic systems in the
sample. The total fraction of quasars with outflows, obtained from adding the percentages
above, is 41-77%, which we express as a range because of the possibility that quasars in
the study reported in Richards et al. (1999) show more than one C iv system and also
the possibility of overlapping with some of other the classes we described above. Ganguly
& Brotherton (2008) presented a review of recent surveys of quasar absorption lines, and
reached a fraction of 57%-80% quasars with outflows. They used a corrected fraction of
quasars with BALs (Hewett & Foltz 2003) and did not consider a possible total overlap
between AALQSOs and quasars with mini-BALs or high velocity absorbers.
Our analysis includes also the study of low ionization lines at the same zabs as the
C iv absorption. Weymann et al. (1991) observed that ∼10% of C iv BALQSOs are
accompanied by “obvious Mg ii and/or Al iii absorption trough”, which were determined
by visual inspection of the spectra. Using an adapted version of BI for the Mg ii emission
line region, Trump et al. (2006) reported that 0.55%±0.04% of the SDSS quasars at
0.5≤ zem ≤2.15 show Mg ii absorption. Selecting only those classified as C iv BALQSOs
where Mg ii is within the spectral coverage, they obtain that 7.4%±0.5% of BALQSOs
present Mg ii absorption. We have studied the presence of Mg ii by visual inspection
87
of the spectra of subsamples of quasars with zem ≤2.25 and with 1) C iv absorption
broader than 500 km s−1 (which includes BALQSOs) and 2) AALs. We report that
7.0%±1.9% of the C iv BALQSOs in our sample B are accompanied by Mg ii absorption
and 9.0%±1.5% of the C iv AALQSOs include Mg ii in their spectra at approximately
the same velocity as the C iv AAL. However, we do not find any case of C iv mini-BALs
where there is a positive detection of Mg ii at similar velocities. Note, however, that
because we have not fit the continuum and there are Fe ii emission lines in the short-ward
of the Mg ii emission line, it is not possible to conclude that there is a lack of Mg ii
accompanying the C iv mini-BALs. Nonetheless, if present, this absorption would be very
weak. We were expecting the Mg ii absorption to be weaker than the C iv mini-BALs
since previous studies show that, in C iv BALQSOs, Mg ii appears to be weaker than the
C iv absorption (Voit et al. 1993).
We also study the radio properties of all the quasars in our sample (sample B),
and find that 8.9%±0.7% of the ones detected by FIRST are radio-loud, as defined to
have log R∗ ≥ 1. Quasars with mini-BALs and BALs show a slightly smaller fraction
of radio-loud sources (7.4%±1.8% and 6.8%±1.8%, respectively), which may not
be a significant difference. Whereas we do not find any correlations between quasar
radio-loudness and the FWHM or v of the absorption, or with the BI of the quasars,
we report that the strongest radio-sources in our sample (log R∗ > 2) are all quasars
with associated absorption or low v absorption (v < 7000 km s−1). This result agrees
with Richards et al. (2001), where it was reported that the population of quasars with
AALs tend to show larger values of RV (defined similarly to R∗ although using 20 cm
measurements instead of 5 GHz).
In summary, with the goal of computing the fraction of quasars with outflows, we
have reached a total fraction of ∼ 16% quasars with outflows with FWHM > 700 km s−1,
which is the result of adding the fraction of BALQSOs (10.7%±0.7%), non-BALQSOs
with mini-BALs (5.1±0.7%), and non-BALQSOs without mini-BALs and with absorption
88
with FWHM > 3000 km s−1 (0.4%±0.2%); the three latter fractions are mutually
exclusive. If we consider that AALs are part of outflows as well, the total fraction of
quasars with outflows would be 41%, and including the outflowing NALs the final fraction
is ∼< 41-77%.
There is an alternative approach to the calculation of the fraction of quasars with
outflows that consists on the use of the AI measurement, which we also computed for
every quasar (see Table 3-1). There is one consideration to be careful with: because the
computation of AI starts at v = 0, it does not exclude clusters of AALs, Damped Lyα
and similar systems in the host galaxy, and thus it may represent just an upper limit of
the outflow count. Trump et al. (2006), using this parameter, found a raw fraction of
26% quasars with AI > 0. We find that 28% of the quasars in our study have AI > 0.
Mini-BALs, BALs and AALs are present in ∼23% of quasars with AI = 0 (1393 quasars),
resulting in ∼< 51–87% of total quasars presenting C iv outflows. The range represents
without and with narrow absorbers at high velocities (36% - Richards et al. 1999), and
it is an upper limit because we are not aware of the AI of the quasars in the sample of
Richards et al. (1999) and, again, the fraction in Richards et al. (1999) indicates the
number of absorption lines that might be intrinsic, not the fraction of quasars with this
absorption. However, the definition of AI (see §3.3) does not include most of the narrow
absorption, since a C ′ of 1000 was chosen to avoid problems with the continuum fitting,
noise and variable resolution. By using a C ′ = 500, we find that 54% quasars have AI >
0, resulting in a total of ∼< 70-100% of quasars with outflows. If we use the lower limit for
our mini-BAL working definition and impose C ′ to be 700, we find that 42% quasars have
AI > 0, obtaining a total of ∼< 61-97% quasars with outflows. We would like to note again
that we are presenting observed fractions of quasars with outflows and that true fractions
of quasar outflows are expected to be larger (Reichard et al. 2003; Hewett & Foltz 2003).
More work needs to be done to find these fractions.
89
Knowing the fraction of quasars with outflows sets a valuable constraint for
understanding the structure of the absorbing regions (Crenshaw et al. 2003). Assuming
that all quasars eject outflows and that the observed differences in their spectra are only
viewpoint dependent, as unification theories state, the fractions of quasars with each type
of outflow are proportional to the opening angles of the outflows as seen from the central
continuum source. We have found that ∼41-77% of the observed quasars in our sample
include absorption in their spectra that is very likely due to quasar outflows. Resolution of
the SDSS spectra does not allow for accurate measurements of the covering factor in the
line of sight and therefore it is not possible to derive a global covering factor as described
in Crenshaw et al. (2003). However, we can compare the relative fractions of different
absorber types. NALs seem to represent the more frequent class of absorption lines in
quasars (≤ 36% at v > 5000 km s−1; ∼ 26% at v < 5000 km s−1). Quasars present BALs
and mini-BALs with similar frequencies (∼ 10% for both), and there is an overlap of ∼7%
of BALQSOs that also present mini-BALs at v < 25000 km s−1. Further study needs to be
carried out to understand the relationship between NALs and mini-BALs.
An alternative explanation suggests that outflows occur during a phase of the quasar
lifetime. Vestergaard (2003) mentions that ‘at least for low-ionization BAL quasars,
there is evidence that the BAL phenomenon may also be a temporary phase in the early
evolution of the quasar (or soon after its re-ignition; e.g., Canalizo & Stockton 2001;
Canalizo & Stockton 2002)’. Radio activity has been suggested to be associated with the
first stages of the quasar life (assuming that more dusty environments are younger; Baker
et al. 2002). Based on radio properties of our sample, the lack of correlations between
absorption properties and the radio loudness of the quasars discourages the interpretation
that more massive or higher velocity outflows are seen at the onset of the radio activity.
AALQSOs are the strongest radio loudness in our sample, suggesting a link between the
radio activity and large presence of absorbing gas, similar to the products of mergers
(Baker et al. 2002).
90
Different types of observed absorption could happen at different stages as well.
However, because we observe several types of outflows (NALs, mini-BALs, BALs, AALs)
in the same line of sight at a certain time they are not completely exclusive events in
different phases of the life of the quasar. The most plausible scenario is that both effects,
geometry and evolution, are combined to determine the observed properties. Variability
studies and studies on quasars at other redshifts will help to construct a better picture of
the quasar outflow phenomena.
The outflow phenomenon is not exclusive of quasars. To date, Seyfert galaxies were
believed to be the AGN class that present outflows more frequently and quasar outflows
were present in smaller percentages. Previous studies (Crenshaw et al. 1999; Dunn et al.
2008) estimate that ∼ 50% of Seyfert Galaxies show outflows (mostly AALs, maybe
some mini-BALs, but almost no BALs. We have found a percentage of ∼ 41-77%. As
we have seen, the complexity and variety of them might have previously resulted in an
underestimation since narrow, mini-BALs and high velocity absorbers have been missed in
previous systematic studies.
3.7 Summary and Conclusions
With the goal of studying the diversity of outflow lines in quasar spectra, we compile
a comprehensive catalog of C iv absorption lines in the 2200 brightest Sloan Digital
Sky Survey quasars with 1.6 ≤ zem ≤3.5. We select those with FWHM > 700 km s−1
to be unlikely due to intervening material. Our analysis emphasizes absorption lines
that have been sparsely surveyed before: mini-broad absorption lines (mini-BALs) and
high velocity systems. We obtained a probability of finding a mini-BAL per hundred
quasars of 15.5±0.8, and a fraction of quasars with mini-BALs of 11.4%±0.9%. Although
the mini-BAL is strongly related to the more studied Broad Absorption Lines (BALs),
we still find mini-BALs in 5.1%±0.7% of non-BALQSOs (BI = 0). Furthermore, we
report that mini-BALs outflowing at v > 25000 km s−1 are present in 2.5%±0.4% of the
quasars of our sample, covering a part of the FWHM-v space not surveyed before. We
91
find no correlation between the presence of associated absorbers or radio loudness and the
occurance of mini-BALs. Finally, we discuss the total account of quasars where outflows
are observed, obtaining a fraction of 41-77% quasars.
Mini-BALs pose a unique challenge for outflow models because they can have large
outflow velocities, v, with small velocity dispersions, FWHM. BALs and mini-BALs might
represent an evolutionary sequence, a single outflow structure viewed at different angles,
or some combination of these scenarios. In either case, the detection frequencies reported
here provide important constraints on the relative lifetimes or opening angles of the
different outflow types.
92
CHAPTER 4VARIABILITY IN QUASAR OUTFLOWS
4.1 Introduction
The present work has the dual goal of 1) better characterizing the variability of
mini-BAL absorption systems, and 2) confirming the outflow nature of narrow absorption
and other ambiguous systems. To do so, we initiated a program to monitor a selection of
quasars with C iv λλ1548,1550 NAL and mini-BALs from the sample of ∼ 2000 bright
optically selected quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, that we described in Chapter
3. Our program overall examines a nearly unexplored part of the outflow parameter space:
high flow velocities (up to 0.2c) with low internal velocity dispersions ∆v. This large
sample allows us to select spectra that includes C iv absorption lines with a wide variety
of widths and velocity shifts to search for trends between the absorber properties and
the variability timescales and strengths. We present the sample selection and a journal of
the observations in §4.2. Section 4.3 discusses the data reduction and line measurements.
In §4.4 we classify and describe the variable systems. Finally, in §4.5 we summarize the
results and discuss what might be producing the variability based on our findings.
4.2 Sample Selection and Observations
The goal of our project is to detect and characterize variability in C iv NAL and
mini-BALs by comparing Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) observations (carried out at
the 2.5 m telescope at Apache Point Observatory, in the optical) with new observations
we have carried out at telescopes with similar size and instruments with similar resolution
to the one used by the SDSS. We selected quasars from the sample defined in Chapter
3 that have either i) a C iv mini-BAL or ii) a narrower C iv system that is resolved in
the SDSS spectra (R ∼ 2000) and therefore might also have an outflow origin. We chose
absorption systems to cover a wide range in FWHM and velocity shift. The same spectra
often include additional C iv NALs that we use to extend the range of FWHMs we study
down the SDSS resolution limit. We do not include any strong BALs in the present study.
93
This is an ongoing program that includes monitoring of some of these quasars. Here
we present 2-epoch results based on the SDSS and one more recent spectrum obtained by
us.
Table 4-1 describes the journal of the observations and also includes the emission
redshifts (zem) which are taken from SDSS. Twenty six quasars were observed during
three observing runs: two with the GoldCam spectrometer at the 2.1 m telescope at Kitt
Peak NOAO facilities (hereafter KPNO observations) during the Spring of 2006 (April 28
- May 3) and Fall of 2006 (January 12 - 17), and one with the Boller and Chivens CCD
spectrograph (CCDS) at the MDM 2.4 m (hereafter MDM observations) in the Fall of
2005 (Dec 1 - Dec 2). For the KPNO observations we used a 2′′ slit width and the #26
(new) grating to provide resolution R ∼ 1300 (∼230 km/s) across observed wavelengths
from roughly 3700 A to 6100 A, to cover blue-shifted C iv absorption for all the quasars
in our sample. The MDM observations were taken with a 1′′ slit width and a resolution
R ∼ 1200 (∼250 km/s) and several wavelength ranges were used due to the narrower
coverage that the CCDS spectrograph provides (∼1600 A). We would like to note that
these resolutions are sufficient to resolve the C iv doublet with velocity separation 500 km
s−1, providing an acceptable match to the blue SDSS spectral resolution of R ∼ 2000.
All the quasars are strictly non-BALQSOs (as defined in Weymann et al. 1991
as those that have Balnicity Index BI = 0), except for J021119-075722 (BI = 40
km s−1), J083104+532500 (BI = 327 km s−1), J090924+000211 (BI = 277 km s−1),
J142246+352836 (BI = 29 km s−1), J151312+451033 (BI = 349 km s−1), and J231324+003444
(BI = 2 km s−1). These values of BI were measured from the SDSS spectra in Chapter 3.
We include these “marginal” BALQSOs in our study because they allow us to the study
the connection between BALs and narrower absorption features.
4.3 Data Reduction and Measurements
The KPNO and MDM data were reduced and spectra were extracted using packages
from the Image Reduction and Analysis Facility (IRAF) and our own software (coded
94
Table 4-1. Journal of observations
OBSERVATION DATE (UT)OBJECT zem SDSS New
J020845+002236 1.88544 20000925 KPNO 20070115J021119-075722 1.87689 20010911 KPNO 20070117J025928-001959 2.00129 20000930 MDM 20051201J083104+532500 2.06453 20001205 KPNO 20070116J085417+532735 2.41821 20001222 MDM 20051201J090152+334413 2.02595 20031215 MDM 20051202J090924+000211 1.86498 20010120 KPNO 20070116J092849+504930 2.34743 20011209 KPNO 20070117J093857+412821 1.93549 20030131 KPNO 20070115J094646+392719 2.20722 20030311 KPNO 20070116J102907+651024 2.16149 20010121 KPNO 20060504J103112+380717 1.89302 20031229 KPNO 20070115J103859+484049 2.16255 20020321 KPNO 20070117J132801+573113 2.05695 20030430 KPNO 20070117J133141+410158 1.93173 20040327 KPNO 20060502J133246+542608 2.02486 20030326 KPNO 20060430J141644+441557 1.92075 20040409 KPNO 20060501J142246+352836 2.10499 20040519 KPNO 20060504J144105+045454 2.06405 20010421 KPNO 20060429J151312+451033 2.00974 20030323 KPNO 20060502J154601+382009 2.19027 20040611 KPNO 20060501J161511+314728 2.09459 20040521 KPNO 20060430J162746+463339 1.91550 20020413 KPNO 20060429J163651+313147 1.83810 20030525 KPNO 20060504J171748+275532 1.92905 20020606 KPNO 20060430J231324+003444 2.08406 20000929 MDM 20051201
Information such as slit widths, wavelength coverages and resolution can be found in thetext. Emission redshifts are taken from SDSS.
in IDL). For the spectra obtained at KPNO, we used HeNeAr lamps for the wavelength
calibrations and quartz lamps for the flat-fields, both located inside the spectrograph. We
used the overscan to substract the bias level of the CCD. One dimension response function
was sufficient to create an appropriate flat. The data were flux calibrated using same-night
observations of KPNO standard stars. We did not perform absolute flux calibrations due
to time and weather constraints. The MDM spectra were reduced and extracted in a
similar manner, with the exception of the use of a combination of HgNe, NeAr and ‘rare
gas’ lamps for the wavelength calibrations. Also, bias frames showed some structure and
therefore both overscan and bias were substracted from every frame.
SDSS spectra were shifted whenever necessary by using sky lines (primarily [O i]
λ5577.338) in order to have the best wavelength correspondence between KPNO, MDM
95
and SDSS spectra. A maximum shift of 2 A has been applied and all the spectra were
shifted in the same direction, modifying the v measurents by ≤ 130 km s−1. Very accurate
v measurements are not necessary for our study and therefore we still take advantage of
the SDSS zem.
Figure 4-1 includes every observed quasar. SDSS spectra (black) are plotted over
the KPNO/MDM spectra (red). We transformed the spectra to rest wavelengths using
the SDSS zem. Some of the spectra are plotted after they underwent a 3- or 5-pixel wide
boxcar function smoothing to improve the display and facilitate comparisons between the
two spectra.
All of the spectra were normalized to unity in the continuum by a least-squares linear
fit to wavelength regions where absorption or emission were not present. This simple
normalization was sufficient to match the SDSS, MDM and KPNO spectra in the majority
of cases and throughout most of the spectral coverage of interest. However, bluewards of
4000 A (observed wavelength), the SDSS spectra sometimes deviate from the KPNO or
MDM data due to poor signal-to-noise or possibly, poor flux calibrations (J020845-002236
and J141644+441557). We do not consider those deviations to be due to variability, and
no further corrections were carried out since those deviations do not affect the absorption
features of interest here.
Following Lundgren et al. (2007), Figure 4-1 also includes values for the upper and
lower rest frame velocity boundaries of the absorption profiles in the SDSS spectrum (vmin
and vmax - dashed vertical lines in each plot). These velocities were determined by visual
inspection of each spectrum and defined as the location where the flux densities abandon
the level of the continuum.
Table 4-2 lists the results of our measurements of v, FWHM and REW on the
absorption lines. In order to extract normalized measurements of Rest Equivalent Width
(REW) and Full Width Half Minimum (FWHM), we fit a local pseudo-continuum
(continuum and emission lines) around the absorption lines by using first or second order
96
polynomial functions and Gaussians (POLYFIT in IDL and Gatorplot). Complex cases
among the present data are discussed in the Appendix.
We fit the absorption lines with one or more Gaussians, as needed, to obtain
an accurate measure of the REW. The 1σ errors in the REW listed in Table 4-2 are
dominated by the continuum placement. To estimate these errors, we manually shifted the
continuun up and down and re-measured the REW in both situations. These manual shifts
are based on visual inspection and measurements of the root-mean-square (rms) noise
in the continuum adjacent to the absorption features. The errors are our best estimates
at 1σ. We then measured the FWHM and the centroid velocities, v, directly from the
observed profiles1 . To be consistent in our measurements of NALs and mini-BALs, we
do not correct the measured FWHMs of the C iv doublet separation (∼ 500 km s−1), and
we measured FWHMs for resolved NAL doublets as if they were a single feature. Thus
the minimum FWHM we measure (for unresolved lines) is the doublet separation plus
spectral resolution, roughly 700 km s−1. Finally, we derive a dimensionless “Depth” for
every feature from the REW divided by the FWHM.
Table 4-2 lists the measurements of FWHM and v for the SDSS data only, except
for the cases where the SDSS spectra did not include any absorption but the new spectra
did, for which we list the new FWHM and v measurement. Table 4-2 also lists the REWs
for both the SDSS (REWSDSS) and the newer KPNO or MDM data (REWnew). In Table
4-2 we also include a measurement of the fractional change in the equivalent widths,
RE ≡ ∆REW/ < REW >, where ∆REW = |REWnew - REWSDSS| and < REW > is the
average value between the two epochs. As noted in Lundgren et al. (2007), these fractional
changes can be “deceptively small”. For example, features whose strengths changed
dramatically (by factors of several or more) must still have RE ≤ 2. A combination of the
1 Note that these FWHMs differ from the ones in Chapter 3, where we reportedFWHMs based on fits to the individual doublet members.
97
analysis of this parameter and visual inspection helps to discriminate between variable and
non-variable absorption and to describe better the variability when present, as we explain
in the following section.
In two instances, absorption, which was not present in the SDSS spectra, has clearly
appeared in the new observation (the absorption at λ ∼ 1395 A in J102907+651024 and
the absorption at λ ∼ 1445 A in J163651+313147, Figure 4-1). We have not included in
our list of absorption features any other differences between the SDSS and the new epoch
spectra because in every case these differences could be attributed to changes in emission
lines, variations within the noise, or they location at the edge of the spectrum, where the
flux calibration is more uncertain.
98
Figure 4-1. SDSS spectra (black) plotted over KPNO or MDM spectra (red). The spectrahave been normalized by linear fits. Dashed vertical lines indicate vmin andvmax of the mini-BALs and marginal NALs in the original spectra (SDSS) thatwe specifically targeted for this study.
99
Tab
le4-
2.A
bsor
ptio
nlin
espr
oper
ties
OB
JEC
T∆
t obs
vFW
HM
RE
WS
DS
SR
EW
new
∆R
EW
/<R
EW
>va
riab
?co
mpl
ex?
(yrs
)(k
ms−
1)
(km
s−1)
(A)
(A)
J020
845+
0022
363.
345
2228
016
400.
8+0.3
−0.3
0.6+
0.2
−0.3
0.3+
0.3
−0.3
nono
J021
119-
0757
222.
851
8260
1780
3.5+
0.6
−0.6
4.5+
0.7
−0.7
0.25
+0.1
5−
0.1
5no
noJ0
2592
8-00
1959
2.58
341
120
820
0.9+
0.2
−0.1
21.
5+0.3
−0.2
0.50
+0.1
9−
0.1
9no
noJ0
8310
4+53
2300
2.96
292
2026
405.
9+0.6
−0.5
16.3
+1.0
−1.0
0.94
+0.0
7−
0.0
7ye
sye
sJ0
8541
7+53
2735
2.04
416
480
3340
2.2+
0.4
−0.4
0.76
+0.1
7−
0.1
81.
0+0.2
−0.2
yes?
noJ0
9015
2+33
4413
0.97
010
680
1180
1.37
+0.1
8−
0.2
00.
8+0.2
−0.2
0.52
+0.1
6−
0.1
6ye
s?∗
yes
J090
924+
0002
113.
211
2088
019
805.
3+0.7
−0.3
3.7+
0.4
−0.4
0.36
+0.1
1−
0.1
1ye
sno
J092
849+
5049
302.
176
3954
021
203.
2+0.6
−0.4
<0.
4>
1.6
yes
no30
800
1810
1.1+
0.3
−0.3
<0.
2>
1.4
yes
noJ0
9385
7+41
2821
2.04
444
940
5940
3.9+
0.4
−0.6
3.3+
0.4
−0.6
0.17
+0.1
0−
0.1
0no
noJ0
9464
6+39
2719
1.74
538
780
2540
5.1+
0.5
−0.4
1.2+
0.3
−0.2
1.24
+0.1
4−
0.1
3ye
sno
J102
907+
6510
242.
444
3884
011
000.
87+
0.1
0−
0.1
00.
78+
0.0
4−
0.0
40.
11+
0.0
8−
0.0
8no
no31
440
760
<0.
20.
38+
0.0
4−
0.0
5>
0.6
yes
noJ1
0311
2+38
0717
1.60
922
200
1020
0.96
+0.1
8−
0.1
93.
9+0.4
−0.4
1.21
+0.1
3−
0.1
3ye
sye
s?J1
0385
9+48
4049
2.23
232
560
1720
3.6+
0.4
−1.4
0.58
+0.1
5−
0.1
61.
4+0.2
−0.3
yes
yes
2666
018
004.
8+0.4
−0.4
2.8+
0.4
−0.4
0.53
+0.1
0−
0.1
0ye
sye
sJ1
3280
1+57
3113
1.80
741
760
2920
5.9+
0.7
−0.8
7.2+
0.6
−0.7
0.20
+0.0
9−
0.0
9no
noJ1
3314
1+41
0158
1.08
635
880
900
2.75
+0.1
1−
0.1
22.
61+
0.1
1−
0.1
20.
05+
0.0
4−
0.0
4no
noJ1
3324
6+54
2608
1.52
940
520
900
1.96
+0.1
8−
0.1
81.
83+
0.1
4−
0.1
40.
07+
0.0
8−
0.0
8no
noJ1
4164
4+44
1557
1.07
321
540
2120
1.74
+0.1
4−
0.2
0<
0.5
>1.
1ye
sye
s?J1
4224
6+35
2836
0.93
118
120
2920
5.0+
0.3
−0.3
3.1+
0.2
−0.3
0.47
+0.0
6−
0.0
6ye
sye
s?14
140
980
0.31
+0.0
4−
0.0
5<
0.25
>0.
2ye
sno
J144
105+
0454
542.
433
5528
038
605.
2+1.0
−0.6
1.1+
0.3
−0.2
1.3+
0.2
−0.2
yes
yes
4668
018
801.
4+0.4
−0.3
1.5+
0.4
−0.3
0.07
+0.2
−0.2
nono
2078
010
900.
70+
0.1
7−
0.1
20.
47+
0.1
2−
0.0
90.
4+0.2
−0.2
nono
J151
312+
4510
331.
547
2516
018
601.
4+0.2
−0.2
3.8+
0.2
−0.2
0.92
+0.0
7−
0.0
7ye
sye
s19
700
3740
4.8+
0.3
−0.3
6.2+
0.4
−0.4
0.25
+0.0
6−
0.0
6ye
sye
s
112
Tab
le4-
2.C
onti
nued
OB
JEC
T∆
t obs
vFW
HM
RE
WS
DS
SR
EW
new
∆R
EW
/<R
EW
>va
riab
?co
mpl
ex?
(yrs
)(k
ms−
1)
(km
s−1)
(A)
(A)
J154
601+
3820
090.
862
5508
096
00.
96+
0.1
3−
0.1
40.
68+
0.1
2−
0.0
90.
34+
0.1
4−
0.1
4no
noJ1
6151
1+31
4728
0.92
733
140
4260
5.4+
0.6
−0.6
4.8+
0.4
−0.4
0.12
+0.0
9−
0.0
9no
no21
920
1040
2.0+
0.2
−0.2
2.3+
0.3
−0.3
0.14
+0.1
1−
0.1
1no
no17
780
1080
3.0+
0.2
−0.2
3.2+
0.2
−0.3
0.06
+0.0
6−
0.0
6no
noJ1
6274
6+46
3339
2.11
135
420
560
0.71
+0.1
1−
0.0
90.
62+
0.0
9−
0.0
90.
14+
0.1
3−
0.1
3no
noJ1
6365
1+31
3147
1.60
120
880
2020
<0.
11.
0+0.3
−0.2
>1.
6ye
sno
5300
820
1.59
+0.1
5−
0.1
31.
38+
0.1
2−
0.1
00.
14+
0.0
8−
0.0
8no
noJ1
7174
8+27
5532
2.02
141
980
920
3.2+
0.2
−0.2
3.0+
0.2
−0.2
0.06
+0.0
6−
0.0
6no
noJ2
3132
4+00
3444
2.48
242
720
640
0.30
+0.0
5−
0.0
60.
30+
0.0
6−
0.0
70.
00+
0.1
6−
0.1
6no
no24
800
3000
4.8+
0.3
−0.3
5.9+
0.3
−0.3
0.21
+0.0
5−
0.0
5ye
sye
s11
240
1180
3.51
+0.1
3−
0.1
44.
10+
0.1
3−
0.1
40.
16+
0.0
3−
0.0
3no
no80
6013
001.
43+
0.1
0−
0.1
01.
68+
0.1
1−
0.1
10.
16+
0.0
6−
0.0
6no
no
All
FW
HM
and
vm
easu
rem
ents
are
from
the
SDSS
data
,un
less
abso
rpti
onw
asno
tpr
esen
tin
the
SDSS
spec
tra.
Exp
lana
tion
sfo
rth
ela
st
two
colu
mns
are
foun
din
Sect
ion
4.4.
1.∗
We
extr
apol
ate
over
the
wav
elen
gth
rang
e13
52-1
357
Ain
the
calc
ulat
ion
for
bein
gun
relia
ble.
113
4.4 Analysis
4.4.1 Characterizing the Variability
The last two columns in Table 4-2 give our classifications regarding the variability
of the absorption systems between the two observations (SDSS and KPNO/MDM).
We detect variability mainly by visual inspection by comparing spectra from the two
epochs, e.g., Figure 4-1. In order to quantify this variability and provide another tool
to discriminate variable from non-variable absorption, we also refer to the fractional
change in the integrated line strengths: ∆REW/<REW>, or RE. In most cases, strong
variability corresponds to large changes in RE (Table 4-2). Note that RE alone is not a
reliable measure of the variability in general because outflow lines can vary in complicated
ways that are not measured by RE. For example, the lines might shift in velocity, vary
over only part of the profile, or strengthen and weaken simultaneously in different parts of
the profile, resulting in RE ≈ 0. Table 4-2 lists our final assessments of the variability in
each system. The classification “yes” means this system was clearly variable; “no” means
it is not variable beyond our measurement uncertainties, and “yes?” means the systems
appears to be weakly variable but better data are needed to confirm this result. Most of
the clearly variable cases have RE ≥ 0.5, while the clearly non-variable ones have RE ≤0.2. In the analysis of the variability below, we will consider only the clearly variable
systems (marked with a “yes” in Table 4-2).
The last column in Table 4-2 provides an indicator of complex variability, which
we define as significant changes in the absorption profile or centroid velocity. Simple
(non-complex) systems changed strength without modifying their absorption shape. A
typical case of simple variability is the absorption present in J090924+000211 (Figure 4-1).
Although the strength of the line has decreased from one observation to the other, the
shape of the profile has barely changed and the centroid velocity remains almost constant.
An example of complex variability can be seen in J083104+532500 (Figure 4-1). The
complex evolution of these absorption profiles results in different centroids and velocities
114
from the original observation to the new one, although as we describe in Section 4.4.2,
the velocity changes are never larger than ∼ 500 km s−1. The last column in Table 4-2
tabulates our classification of complex systems.
Table 4-2 lists all the mini-BALs and marginal NALs initially targeted for this
study, plus two new mini-BALs (in J102907+651024 and J163651+313147) that appeared
between the two observations. In these spectra, we also visually inspected narrower NALs
not specifically targeted and not included in Table 4-2. These NALs are distributed across
the full range of velocity shifts. None of these narrow features varied.
We find that mini-BALs and narrow absorption lines vary at any ∆t over the
timescales we study. We are studying long-term variability (∆t ranges from 0.8 to 3.4
years). Figure 4-2 displays the fractional change of REW versus time variability for all of
the studied cases. We do not find any significant patterns with time within the timescales
covered and at any given ∆t it is equally likely to find variable as well as non-variable
systems. Our study complements the previous work on BALs by emphasizing mini-BALs
and NALs.
4.4.2 Variability Fractions and Trends
We find a subsample of 19 absorption features that we consider variable cases, out of
the 39 ones we have analyzed. These represent a variability of 49% out of all the studied
C iv absorption lines in our sample. Some quasars present more than one absorption line,
and thus we find that the rate of quasars with at least one variable C iv absorption line
is higher (57%). Considering only the targeted mini-BALs and broader absorbers at high
velocity, 52% of the targeted absorption features varied.
Because the quasars have been observed at different time intervals, and because
different quasars might have different timescales to produce observable absorption changes,
these percentages are lower limits, and more absorption features are expected to change in
longer times.
115
Figure 4-2. Fractional change of REW as a function of ∆t (in the quasars’ restframe) ofthe mini-BALs and marginal NALs targeted in this study (Table 4-2).
Figure 4-3. Distribution of absorption features in FWHM (black) and the number of themthat varied (red/filled) in 250 km s−1 bins.
116
Figures 4-3 to 4-5 show the number of systems that varied versus their FWHM, depth
and v of the absorption. Figure 4-3 displays the distribution in FWHM, as tabulated
in Table 4-2, of the number of cases that varied (red/filled) versus the total number of
absorption features included in our study in 500 km s−1 bins. As we mentioned earlier,
our goal is two-fold; one objective is to confirm, through variability, the intrinsic nature
of the narrowest systems in our sample which might or might not be outflows. As Figure
4-3 shows, the majority of systems with 500 < FWHM < 1000 km s−1 remains invariable,
and absorption lines are more prone to vary if they have FWHM > 1500 km s−1. The
Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test probability that the FWHM in both distributions (all
cases and only variable cases) are drawn from the same population is 0.17. However, if
we select only those systems with FWHM > 1500 km s−1, the KS probability is 0.9993,
which implies consistency between the two populations. For the systems with FWHM
< 1500 km s−1, the difference between the two populations (all cases and only variable
cases) is larger than 3 σ, which suggests that they are drawn from different populations.
We have confirmed the outflow nature of two cases with 500 < FWHM < 1000 km s−1
that have varied (lowest velocity absorption lines in the spectra of J102907+651024 and
J142246+352836, Figure 4-1).
Figure 4-4 presents the distribution of C iv absorbers versus their depth for the full
sample (black) and those cases that varied (red line/filled). There is no obvious trend in
the variability versus line depth. The KS test probability of both populations (the depths
of only variable cases and all cases) being drawn from the same distribution is 0.9995,
which suggests consistency between the two populations.
The second goal of this work is to characterize the variability of confirmed outflows,
excluding intervening material. Figure 4-5 shows the total number of studied outflows
at each velocity (black) and the number of outflows that varied (red/filled) in velocity
bins of 5000 km s−1. We have included only those absorption features that are very likely
outflows: all of the cases with FWHM > 1000 km s−1 and those narrower absorption lines
117
Figure 4-4. Distribution of absorption features in depth (black) and the number of themthat varied (red/filled) in 0.05 bins.
Figure 4-5. Distribution of absorption features in velocity (black) and the number of themthat varied (red/filled) in 5000 km s−1 bins.
118
that also varied. C iv absorption with FWHM > 1000 km s−1 is unlikely to be part of
intervening material (Chapter 32 ). We do not find any significant trend with velocity. The
KS test probability that the v for the variable cases and all cases are drawn from the same
population is 0.63, which suggests consistency between the two populations.
Figure 4-6. Fractional change of REW versus average REW of all the absorption lines inour sample
In Figure 4-6 we represent the absolute fractional change of REW versus averaged
REW for comparison with Lundgren et al. (2007). We find that only features with
<REW> < 4 A (approx. 900 km s−1) show absolute fractional changes in REW larger
than 1, values which are within the errors.
2 In Chapter 3 we used a lower limit of FWHM ≥ 700 km s−1 for the higher oscillationstrength individual line of the C iv doublet while in this work we are using a characteristicFWHM for the whole doublet profile
119
Figure 4-7. Fractional change of REW versus depth of all the absorption lines in oursample
Figure 4-7 is similar to Figure 4-6, but we plot depth instead of <REW>. As we find
in Figure 4-6, there are not absorption features with ∆REW/<REW> larger than 1 for a
certain value of depth (depth ∼> 0.5).
The large variety of velocities of the absorption features in our sample allows us to
search for trends of this property with variability. Figure 4-8 displays the fractional change
of REW versus velocity. This figure shows that both variable and non-variable absorption
features are observed at every velocity. There is not a narrow range of velocity where the
largest ∆EW/<EW> occur.
Figures 4-9 and 4-10 display velocity and velocity width (defined as vmax−vmin) versus
depth for the cases we have found to vary. In Figure 4-9, the arrows connect vwidth and
depth in the SDSS data to the values of those quantities in the second observation. Figure
4-9 shows that in the large majority of variable cases, changes in depth and in velocity
width occur in the same direction, i.e., whenever the depth increases/decreases, the vwidth
increases/decreases as well, respectively. Absorption features in quasars J103112+380717
120
Figure 4-8. Fractional change of REW distribution with velocity.
Figure 4-9. Change in the (depth) - (velocity width at the continuum level) space of theabsorption.
and J094646+392719 in Figure 4-1 are examples of this phenomenon. In these cases, as
121
the absorption feature increases in strength, it also widens at the base of the absorption
(continuum level), thereby covering a larger range of absorbed velocities.
Figure 4-10. Change in (depth) - (velocity) space of the absorption.
We do not find significant changes in the velocity of the absorption in any of the
variable cases. In every studied case, variability occurs primarly in strength. There are
no cases showing clear displacement of the absorption feature as ‘a whole’, as reported
in Gabel et al. (2003) (shown in their Figure 2), where a feature seems to decelerate by
∼ 100 km s−1 in 1.8 years. Figure 4-10 shows how the v is very steady in variable cases.
Slight variations in velocity are mostly caused by the complexity of some absorption
profiles, which complicates the determination of the centroid and thus the central velocity,
as we described in §4.4.1.
If several absorption features were present in one quasar spectrum and one of
these features varied, then the others either did not vary or they varied in the same
direction (increase/decrease if the original increase/decrease). For example, in the case of
J151312+451033 (Figure 4-1), the absorption at ∼ 1415 A increases significantly while the
absorption centered at ∼ 1500 A did not suffer such a dramatic change.
122
Our program does not select a random large collection of quasars to study the
appearance of absorption lines that can only be studied by serendipity (Hamann et al.
2008). However, sometimes new absorption lines appear in the spectra of quasars which
were included in the sample because of other absorption features. That is the case of
absorption features in the spectra of J102907+651024 and J163651+313147 (Figure 4-1).
4.4.3 Comparisons to Previous Work on BALs
The mini-BAL and BAL phenonemon are clearly not independent, as we have seen
that mini-BALs can become BALs in timescales of years in the quasar restframe.
Lundgren et al. (2007), and previously Barlow (1993), reported that the largest
variability occurs in the absorption features with relatively small equivalent widths. Figure
2 of Lundgren et al. (2007) demonstrated that only features with <EW> smaller than
1000 km s−1 show values of the ∆EW/<EW> larger than 1. We find similar results,
obtaining that only features with <REW> < 4 A (approx. 900 km s−1) show absolute
fractional changes in REW larger than 1, within the errors. Notice that Figure 2 in
Lundgren et al. (2007) shows a larger range in EW because their study focuses on BALs.
The large variety of velocities of the absorption features in our sample allow us to
search for trends of this property with variability. Figure 4-8 displays the fractional change
of REW versus velocity. This figure shows that both variable and non-variable absorption
features are observed at every velocity, as we showed in Figure 4-5 for only outflows.
There is not a narrow range of velocity where the largest ∆EW/<EW> occur. Lundgren
et al. (2007) report that large changes in REW occur only for velocities exceeding 12000
km s−1. However, they do not cover velocities above 25000 km s−1 and they have a strong
emphasis on BALs. In our sample of mini-BALs up to v ∼ 60000 km s−1, we find that
the distribution is very homogenous in velocity, but the largest fractional changes in REW
occur at v > 20000 km s−1.
123
4.5 Discussion
We have presented results from a 2-epoch observational study of 26 quasars selected
for having either mini-BALs or weak BALs (certain outflow lines) or marginal/broad
NALs (candidate outflow lines). Our main goals are to characterize the variability
properties of the outflow features and test the possible outflow origin of the candidate
NALs and other NALs present in the spectra. We are particularly interested in mini-BALs
and other narrow outflow features in order to establish a comparison to previous work on
variability in BALs (Barlow 1993; Lundgren et al. 2007; Gibson et al. 2008).
4.5.1 Summary of Main Results
• We find that 49% out of the 39 studied C iv absorption lines in our sample vary overa range of ∆tobs = 0.9 - 3.3 years in the quasar rest frame. Out of the 26 studiedquasars, this represents a percentage of 57% quasars that include at least one variableabsorption feature. Considering only the targeted mini-BALs and broader absorbersat high velocity, 52% of the targeted absorption features varied.
• We find that 58% of the variable cases show complex variability.
• The variability occurs at all studied velocities (from 5000 to 60000 km s−1) and wedo not conclusively find any trend between the fractional change of the absorption(∆REW/<REW>) and v.
• We do not find any trends with REW or depth, except that there is not variability ofthe absorption features with largest depths, which occur in narrow systems.
• Except for the case of J144105+045454, none of the studied variable featuresshow shifts in velocity larger than 1000 km s−1. Although the centroid velocitiesgenerally shift between observations in the complex cases, there is no clear evidencefor acceleration or deceleration of gas in the flow
• None of the narrow systems with FHWM < 700 kms −1 varied in our data. Thisproperty might suggest that very strong narrow absorption tends to be intervening.
• The mini-BAL and BAL phenomenon are clearly not independent, as we have seenthat mini-BALs can become BALs in timescales of years in the quasar restframe.
4.5.2 Physical Properties of the Absorbers and Variability Causes
In this section we discuss how the results above help to place constraints on the
absorber physical properties and the causes of the observed variability. Previous studies on
124
this matter, i.e., Misawa et al. (2005) and Narayanan et al. (2004), describe the possible
causes of mini-BAL variability.
4.5.2.1 Change of the ionization state
Changes in the ionizing continuum flux can cause changes in the ionization state of
the outflow absorbers, leading to changes in the absorption line strengths. Weak outflow
lines like NALs and mini-BALs might be more susceptible to this effect than BALs if the
former are generally less saturated.
We are not able to determine whether variations in the level of the continuum
ionization are the cause of the C iv absorption variability mainly because of three issues.
First, we cannot measure the continuum flux because we do not have absolute flux
calibrations for the KPNO and MDM spectra. Moreover, this information would still
not measure the ionizing flux in the UV/soft X-ray continuum. Second, we only have
information regarding one ionic species (C iv) and we cannot determine the ionization
of the outflows. Third, there might be a delay between the time the continuum reaches
the absorber and the absorber variations (recombination time). We have carried out such
a study for J093857+412821, which has been described in Chapter 2. Barlow (1993),
Lundgren et al. (2007) and Gibson et al. (2008) found no correlations between the
continuum flux level and the absorption changes.
If we assume that the variability is caused by the ionization changes, then we can
place limits on the minimum electron density (ne) and the maximum distance from the
continuum source. To do so, we need to resort to some assumptions: the changes in the
continuum are small, the gas is in ionization equilibrium, C iv is the dominant ionization
species of C , and that the temperature of the gas is T ∼ 20000 K (Hamann et al. 1997a;
Narayanan et al. 2004).
Using Eq. (1) in Narayanan et al. (2004), our observed variability times provide upper
limits on the recombination times. We have found that the C iv absorption varies in a
wide range of variability times. Most importantly, we have not found an observed time
125
after which every outflowing C iv absorber varies. Variability times are included in Table
4-2 and have been discussed further in §4.4.1. Assuming a typical variability timescale
of 2.0 years, we can derive a minimum electron density ne ∼> 5700 cm−3. The shortest
observed variability timescale (0.97 yrs) will result in ne ∼> 11600 cm−3.
These electron densities allow us to derive the maximum distance between the
absorbing clouds and the continuum source by assuming the gas is in photoionization
equilibrium with an ionization parameter and continuum shape (Narayanan et al. (2004)
eq. [2]). For this, we also need to assume that the absorbing clouds are not “shielded”
from the continuum emission source. Thus, the gas is receiving the whole flux of ionizing
photons scaled by 1/R2. By using a typical luminosity for the quasars in our sample
(Lbol ∼ 5 x 1046 erg s−1), and an ionizing parameter U ≈ 0.02 (optimal for C iv), we
obtain a maximum distance between the absorbers and the source of the ionization
continuum of ≤ 2 kpc.
We find that sometimes in the same spectrum absorption at some velocity varies
significantly while absorption in the same spectrum at another velocity remains almost
constant (description in §4.4.2). If variability is due to changes in the ionizing continuum,
both absorbers should be affected by the ionization changes in the same manner, unless
they are either 1) at different distances (e.g., the invariable absorption is produced by an
absorber(s) that must be located at a distance r > 2 kpc from the continuum, while the
variable is related to an absorber which must be closer), or 2) the invariable absorption
is saturated. None of the mini-BAL or narrow lines in spectra of our quasar sample
goes black, which means that if they are saturated, the absorbers must be only partially
covering the emission source.
We have found absorption that remains constant over long timescales (> 3 years) in
the quasar restframe. If the ionizing continuum has varied during this time, and assuming
we have not randomly caught it at the same stage at both observations, the lack of
126
variation in the absorption troughs might indicate that the absorber(s) is(are) too tenuous
to respond on continuum variation timescales.
4.5.2.2 Motion of the absorber
Variability can also be caused by transverse bulk motion of the absorber. Variability
timescales in this case correspond to crossing time of the absorber(s) across the emitting
background source (which would produce variations in the covering factors of the gas).
The background sources could be the Broad Emission Line Region (BELR) and/or
the continuum source ( Ganguly et al. 1999). Typical sizes for the BELR of the quasars
in our sample are derived from the empirical relation between them and the quasar
luminosity (Vestergaard 2002), obtaining ∼ 3pc. The continuum source size that is
producing most of the continuum can be estimated to be 5RS = 10GMBH/c2 (Misawa
et al. 2005), where RS and MBH are the Schwarzschild radius and the black hole mass,
respectively. We derive MBH from the relation between FWHM of the C iv emission line
and the luminosity at 1450 A, (Warner et al. 2003). Typical values for MBH in the quasars
of our sample are 109-1010 M¯. Therefore, we obtain typical radial sizes of the continuum
source to be ∼ 0.0005 - 0.005 pc.
By assuming a simple geometry, we can obtain lower limits for the transverse velocity
vtr of the absorber in the cases where the absorption has appeared/disappeared. Imagine a
homogenous background source as a square of side 2r, and another square outflow passing
across it. In order to show variability in the absorption, the absorber should travel a
transverse distance Cf × 2r, where Cf is the covering factor. For example, in the case
of the absorption at a rest wavelength of ∼ 1440 A in the spectrum of J141644+441557
(Figure 4-1), the absorption is present in the SDSS spectrum but it has disappeared in the
KPNO one. We have an upper limit for the variability time, given by the time difference
between the two observations: ∼ 1 yr. Because the depth of the normalized absorption
indicates that Cf is ≥ 0.15 (15% of the emitting source), the distance that the absorber
(assuming sharp edges) needs to travel in order to abandon the line of sight is ∼ 5 × 1012
127
- 5 × 1015 cm (0.00015 - 0.0015 pc). In 1 year, this distance can be travelled by absorbers
moving at transverse speeds of vtr > 150 - 1500 km s−1. These values are comparable to
the disk rotation speeds just beyond RCIV, vtr ∼ 3000 km s−1. However, in order to cross
the same area of the BLR (radius ∼ 3 pc), we would need speeds larger than the speed of
light, as was obtained for the outflow in HS 1603+3820 studied in Misawa et al. (2005).
Therefore, we conclude that the absorber covers primarily the UV continuum source and,
maybe, only a small part of the BLR (Misawa et al. 2005).
128
CHAPTER 5SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Outflows are a fundamental part of quasars: they bring first-hand physical information
about the quasar environments, they are common (and maybe ubiquitous) and they might
be key to connect the AGN with their host galaxies. However, many aspects of these
outflows (e.g., acceleration mechanisms, geometry, evolution) are poorly understood.
I present new measurements and analyses of these absorption lines in the spectra
of the quasar PG0935+417 (zem ≈ 1.966). This quasar shows a high velocity C iv
mini-Broad Absorption Line (mini-BAL) outflowing at ∼51000 km s−1. We detect,
using Lick observatory, Hubble Space Telescope, and Sloan Digital Sky Survey spectra,
absorption in C iv λλ1548,1551 (already reported in Hamann et al. 1997a and Narayanan
et al. 2004) and, for the first time in this outflow, absorption in Nv λλ1240 and Ovi
λλ1034 in this mini-BAL system. The absence of lower ionization lines indicates that
the flow is highly ionized with an ionization parameter log U ∼> -1.1. The resolved Ovi
indicates that the lines are moderately saturated with the absorber, covering just ∼80% of
the background continuum source. We estimate the total column density to be NH ∼> 3.0
x 1019 cm−2, which is small enough to be compatible with radiation pressure mechanisms
accelerating this outflow.
I also have contributed to the study of outflows by focusing in a realm of the
parameter space that has been sparsely surveyed before: mini-broad absorption lines
(mini-BALs) and high velocities outflows (v ∼> 10000 km s−1). My goals are to 1)
quantitatively define the range of outflow lines in quasar spectra, 2) examine their
detection frequencies and distributions in velocity, strength and FWHM, 3) look for
relationships between the various absorption line types and basic quasar properties, and
4) identify individual outflow line candidates for follow-up studies. To do so, I compile a
comprehensive catalog of C iv absorption lines in the ∼ 2000 brightest SDSS quasars at
1.8≤ z ≤3.5, and select those with FWHM > 700 km s−1 to be unlikely due to intervening
129
material. I obtain a fraction of quasars with mini-BALs of 11.4%±0.9%. Although
the mini-BAL phenomenon is strongly related to the more previously studied Broad
Absorption Lines (BALs) present in BALQSOs, we still find mini-BALs in 5.1%±0.7%
of non-BALQSOs. I find no correlation between the presence of associated absorbers or
radio loudness and the occurance of mini-BALs. By adding results from other outflow
studies to my results, I estimate a total percentage of quasars with outflows to be ∼41–77%. Mini-BALs pose a unique challenge for outflow models because they can have
large outflow velocities, v, with small velocity dispersions, FWHM. BALs and mini-BALs
might represent an evolutionary sequence, a single outflow structure viewed at different
angles, or some combination of these scenarios. In either case, the detection frequencies
reported here provide important constraints on the relative lifetimes or opening angles of
the different outflow types.
Finally, to characterize better the structural and physical properties of these outflows,
I carried out a monitoring program over a range of ∆t = 0.9 -3.3 years in the quasar rest
frame, using facilities at the Kitt Peak National Observatory and MDM Observatory. By
comparing our new spectra with archival spectra (SDSS) I find that ∼ 50% of quasars
with mini-BAL and BALs at high velocity varied between just two observations. I find
that variability sometimes occurs in complex ways. All the observed variations occur in
intensity and not in velocity. Thus I find no evidence for acceleration/deceleration in the
outflow. I also do not find any correlations between the variability and Rest Equivalent
Width (REW), Full Width Half Minimum (FWHM) or depth of the absorption feature,
except for the fact that most of the narrowest systems did not vary. A significant fraction
of the non-variable narrower systems are probably unrelated to quasar outflows.
130
APPENDIX: ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS
A.1 J083104+532500
The original marginal complex mini-BAL/BAL (FWHM = 2640 km s−1) in this
quasar (BI = 327 km s−1) has increased its strength in both the C iv and the Si iv
absorption. The absorption in the SDSS spectrum was composed of three different
structures: two strong narrow lines (FWHM of the individual lines ∼< 500 km s−1)
superposed on a weaker wider absorption feature. The new absorption profile retains
some of the two troughs but it is impossible to know which of the original three absorption
lines has gotten stronger. The presence of several narrow (FWHM ∼ 600 km s−1) Si iv
absorption lines also suggests that the C iv absorption should be still be composed of
several components. There is very likely an effect of partial covering. We support this
idea for two reasons. First, the doublet ratio of the Si iv doublet line at λ 1350-1360 A
does not show the expected 2:1 ratio in optical depth, which it should if not saturated.
Second, the optical depth in C iv should be at least 5 times larger than Si iv if the Si/C
abundance is roughly solar and Si iv and C iv are the optimal ions present (Hamann et al.
1997c; Hamann & Ferland 1999; Hamann et al. 2008). Partial coverage is commonly found
in NALs (i.e., Hamann et al. 1997c; Ganguly et al. 1999; Arav et al. 2001; Hamann &
Sabra 2004), and in BALs (Arav et al. 1999).
A.2 J092849+504930
The absorber at λ ∼ 1395 A was not originally in our sample of mini and broad
absorption lines in quasars (Chapter 3 because of the possibility of being attributed to
the separation between the Si iv and the O iv emission lines and not to ‘real’ absorption.
However, we include it in this work because its variation between the two epochs (Figure
4-1) seems not to be due to changes in the emission lines, especially since the C iv
emission line and the rest of the Si iv+O iv do not vary.
131
A.3 J093857+412821
We have been monitoring this quasar due to its very variable absorption at ∼ 50000
km s−1. For more information go to Chapter 2.
A.4 J102907+651024
This quasar was observed because of its other absorption lines. However, an
absorption line has seemed to have appeared at λ ∼ 1395 A. Although narrow, its
width (FWHM = 760 km s−1) makes it unlikely to be caused by other ions. The fact that
the C iv emission line wis increasing in strength while keeping its shape suggests that the
trough in the Si iv+O iv emission line is not caused by a decrease in the intensity of this
complex emission lines, and therefore we have included the line as an absorption feature.
A.5 J103859+484049
The SDSS spectrum shows an almost flat pseudo-continuum (continuum + emission
lines) in the region where the Si iv emission lines is supposed to be. The strength of the
C iv emission line and the fact that it does not change between the two observations,
suggests that the C iv absorption in the spectral range λ ∼1380 - 1420 A is strong enough
to be absorbing both the continuum and the emission line. In order to determine the
correct normalized strength of the absorption in both spectra, we fitted a Gaussian to
the KPNO spectrum by outlining it through the highest intensity regions in the range
λ ∼1380 - 1420 A. This method results in a conservative measurement of the strengths
of all the absorption in that region, since the emission could be stronger than we predict.
Si iv absorption lines are present in the same outflow.
Si iv absorption lines are present in the same outflow. Visual inspection of that region
suggests that at least the absorber at zabs ∼ 1.89 (C iv at λ∼ 1415 A) is accompanied
by Si iv absorption at λ∼ 1275 A. The strength of the Si iv doublet, which should
be at least 5 times weaker than C iv if the Si/C abundance is roughly solar and the
optimal ions are Si iv and C iv, suggests that C iv must be saturated because of an effect
132
of partial covering, as it happened in J083104+532500 (above) and the SDSS quasar
J105400+034801 (Hamann et al. 2008).
A.6 J144105+045454
Figure A-1. Normalized SDSS spectra (black) and KPNO spectra (red/grey)
This quasar is an example of what we define as complex absorption variability. The
absorption is present in the spectral region λ∼ 1270 - 1335 A. The presence of Si iiλ1260
and O iλ1302 emission lines intertwined with the absorption forced us to fit Gaussians
to these emission features before measuring. We fit one Gaussian per emission line of
the KPNO spectrum, where the O i emission line is more noticeable. We used this fit to
normalize both SDSS and KPNO spectra, assuming that the emission line has not varied
between both observations. Figure A-1 shows both normalized spectra. Assuming that
there are two distinctive absorption troughs (one at λ∼ 1270 - 1305 A and other at λ∼1305 - 1330 A), both absorption features might have redshifted its centrod (produced
by acceleration). However, further study is necessary because of the complexity of the
variability of this absorption profile.
133
A.7 J163651+313147
As in the case of J102907+651024, this quasar was observed at KPNO because of its
narrow absorption lines. However, a mini-BAL has seemed to have appeared at λ ∼ 1445
A. This absorption line seems far enough from the Si iv emission line to not be attributed
to ‘real’ absorption. Notice, however, the difference between the Si iv emission lines in
both spectra.
134
REFERENCES
Adelman-McCarthy, J. K. and Agueros, M. A. and Allam, S. S. and Allende Prieto, C.and Anderson, K. S. J. and Anderson, S. F. and Annis, J. and Bahcall, N. A. andBailer-Jones, C. A. L. and Baldry, I. K., et al. 2008, ApJS, 175, 297
Aldcroft, T. L., Bechtold, J., & Elvis, M. 1994, ApJS, 93, 1
Anderson, S. F., Weymann, R. J., Foltz, C. B., & Chaffee, F. H., Jr. 1987, AJ, 94, 278
Arav, N., Becker, R. H., Laurent-Muehleisen, S. A., Gregg, M. D., White, R. L.,Brotherton, M. S., & de Kool, M. 1999, ApJ, 524, 566
Arav, N., de Kool, M., Korista, K. T., Crenshaw, D. M., van Breugel, W., Brotherton, M.,Green, R. F., Pettini, M., Wills, B., de Vries, W., Becker, B., Brandt, W. N., Green, P.,Junkkarinen, V. T., Koratkar, A., Laor, A., Laurent-Muehleisen, S. A., Mathur, S., &Murray, N. 2001, ApJ, 561, 118
Arav, N., Li, Z.-Y., & Begelman, M. C. 1994, ApJ, 432, 62
Baker, J. C., Hunstead, R. W., Athreya, R. M., Barthel, P. D., de Silva, E., Lehnert,M. D., & Saunders, R. D. E. 2002, ApJ, 568, 592
Barlow, T. A. 1993, Ph.D. thesis, AA(California Univ.)
Barlow, T. A., & Sargent, W. L. W. 1997, AJ, 113, 136
Becker, R. H., Gregg, M. D., Hook, I. M., McMahon, R. G., White, R. L., & Helfand,D. J. 1997, ApJ, 479, L93
Becker, R. H., White, R. L., Gregg, M. D., Brotherton, M. S., Laurent-Muehleisen, S. A.,& Arav, N. 2000, ApJ, 538, 72
Becker, R. H., White, R. L., & Helfand, D. J. 1995, ApJ, 450, 559
Bennett, A. S. 1962, MmRAS, 68, 163
Bregman, J. N., Glassgold, A. E., Huggins, P. J., Neugebauer, G., Soifer, B. T., Matthews,K., Elias, J. H., Webb, J. R., Pollock, J. T., Leacock, R. J., Smith, A. G., Aller,H. D., Aller, M. F., Hughes, P. A., Maccagni, D., Garilli, B., Giommi, P., Miller, J. S.,Stephens, S., Balonek, T. J., Dent, W. A., Kinsel, W., Wisniewski, W. Z., Williams,P. M., Brand, P. W. J. L., & Ku, W. H.-M. 1990, ApJ, 352, 574
Brotherton, M. S., Laurent-Muehleisen, S. A., Becker, R. H., Gregg, M. D., Telis, G.,White, R. L., & Shang, Z. 2005, AJ, 130, 2006
Brotherton, M. S., van Breugel, W., Smith, R. J., Boyle, B. J., Shanks, T., Croom, S. M.,Miller, L., & Becker, R. H. 1998, ApJ, 505, L7
Canalizo, G., & Stockton, A. 2001, ApJ, 555, 719
135
Canalizo, G., & Stockton, A. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific ConferenceSeries, 255, Mass Outflow in Active Galactic Nuclei: New Perspectives, ed. D. M.Crenshaw, S. B. Kraemer, & I. M. George, 195
Capellupo, D., & Hamann, F. 2009, ApJ(in prep.)
Churchill, C. W., Schneider, D. P., Schmidt, M., & Gunn, J. E. 1999, AJ, 117, 2573
Crenshaw, D. M., & Kraemer, S. B. 2007, ApJ, 659, 250
Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., Boggess, A., Maran, S. P., Mushotzky, R. F., & Wu,C.-C. 1999, ApJ, 516, 750
Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., & George, I. M. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 117
Croton, D. J., Farrar, G. R., Norberg, P., Colless, M., Peacock, J. A., Baldry, I. K.,Baugh, C. M., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Bridges, T., Cannon, R., Cole, S., Collins, C.,Couch, W., Dalton, G., De Propris, R., Driver, S. P., Efstathiou, G., Ellis, R. S., Frenk,C. S., Glazebrook, K., Jackson, C., Lahav, O., Lewis, I., Lumsden, S., Maddox, S.,Madgwick, D., Peterson, B. A., Sutherland, W., & Taylor, K. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1155
de Kool, M. 1993, MNRAS, 265, L17
de Kool, M. 1997, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 128, MassEjection from Active Galactic Nuclei, ed. N. Arav, I. Shlosman, & R. J. Weymann, 233
de Kool, M., & Begelman, M. C. 1995, ApJ, 455, 448
Di Matteo, T., Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. 2005, Nature, 433, 604
Dietrich, M., Hamann, F., Shields, J. C., Constantin, A., Heidt, J., Jager, K., Vestergaard,M., & Wagner, S. J. 2003, ApJ, 589, 722
Dunn, J. P., Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., & Trippe, M. L. 2008, AJ, 136, 1201
Edge, D. O., Shakeshaft, J. R., McAdam, W. B., Baldwin, J. E., & Archer, S. 1959,MmRAS, 68, 37
Elvis, M. 2000, ApJ, 545, 63
Elvis, M. 2006, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana, 77, 573
Everett, J. E. 2005, ApJ, 631, 689
Fan, J. H., & Lin, R. G. 2000, ApJ, 537, 101
136
Fan, X., Narayanan, V. K., Lupton, R. H., Strauss, M. A., Knapp, G. R., Becker, R. H.,White, R. L., Pentericci, L., Leggett, S. K., Haiman, Z., Gunn, J. E., Ivezic, Z.,Schneider, D. P., Anderson, S. F., Brinkmann, J., Bahcall, N. A., Connolly, A. J.,Csabai, I., Doi, M., Fukugita, M., Geballe, T., Grebel, E. K., Harbeck, D., Hennessy, G.,Lamb, D. Q., Miknaitis, G., Munn, J. A., Nichol, R., Okamura, S., Pier, J. R., Prada,F., Richards, G. T., Szalay, A., & York, D. G. 2001, AJ, 122, 2833
Foltz, C. B., Weymann, R. J., Peterson, B. M., Sun, L., Malkan, M. A., & Chaffee, F. H.,Jr. 1986, ApJ, 307, 504
Fox, A. J., Bergeron, J., & Petitjean, P. 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 806
Gabel, J. R., Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., Brandt, W. N., George, I. M., Hamann,F. W., Kaiser, M. E., Kaspi, S., Kriss, G. A., Mathur, S., Mushotzky, R. F., Nandra, K.,Netzer, H., Peterson, B. M., Shields, J. C., Turner, T. J., & Zheng, W. 2003, ApJ, 583,178
Ganguly, R., Bond, N. A., Charlton, J. C., Eracleous, M., Brandt, W. N., & Churchill,C. W. 2001, ApJ, 549, 133
Ganguly, R., & Brotherton, M. S. 2008, ApJ, 672, 102
Ganguly, R., Eracleous, M., Charlton, J. C., & Churchill, C. W. 1999, AJ, 117, 2594
Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green,R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. R., Magorrian, J., Pinkney, J.,Richstone, D., & Tremaine, S. 2000, ApJ, 539, L13
Gibson, R. R., Brandt, W. N., Schneider, D. P., & Gallagher, S. C. 2008, ApJ, 675, 985
Girardi, M., Borgani, S., Giuricin, G., Mardirossian, F., & Mezzetti, M. 1998, ApJ, 506, 45
Grevesse, N., & Sauval, A. J. 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161
Hall, P. B., Anderson, S. F., Strauss, M. A., York, D. G., Richards, G. T., Fan, X., Knapp,G. R., Schneider, D. P., Vanden Berk, D. E., Geballe, T. R., Bauer, A. E., Becker,R. H., Davis, M., Rix, H.-W., Nichol, R. C., Bahcall, N. A., Brinkmann, J., Brunner, R.,Connolly, A. J., Csabai, I., Doi, M., Fukugita, M., Gunn, J. E., Haiman, Z., Harvanek,M., Heckman, T. M., Hennessy, G. S., Inada, N., Ivezic, Z., Johnston, D., Kleinman, S.,Krolik, J. H., Krzesinski, J., Kunszt, P. Z., Lamb, D. Q., Long, D. C., Lupton, R. H.,Miknaitis, G., Munn, J. A., Narayanan, V. K., Neilsen, E., Newman, P. R., Nitta, A.,Okamura, S., Pentericci, L., Pier, J. R., Schlegel, D. J., Snedden, S., Szalay, A. S.,Thakar, A. R., Tsvetanov, Z., White, R. L., & Zheng, W. 2002, ApJS, 141, 267
Hamann, F. 1998, ApJ, 500, 798
Hamann, F. 2009, ApJ(in prep.)
137
Hamann, F., Barlow, T., Cohen, R. D., Junkkarinen, V., & Burbidge, E. M. 1997a, inAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 128, Mass Ejection from ActiveGalactic Nuclei, ed. N. Arav, I. Shlosman, & R. J. Weymann, 19
Hamann, F., Barlow, T. A., Beaver, E. A., Burbidge, E. M., Cohen, R. D., Junkkarinen,V., & Lyons, R. 1995, ApJ, 443, 606
Hamann, F., Barlow, T. A., Cohen, R. D., Junkkarinen, V., & Burbidge, E. M. 1997b, inAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 128, Mass Ejection from ActiveGalactic Nuclei, ed. N. Arav, I. Shlosman, & R. J. Weymann, 187
Hamann, F., Barlow, T. A., Junkkarinen, V., & Burbidge, E. M. 1997c, ApJ, 478, 80
Hamann, F., & Ferland, G. 1999, ARA&A, 37, 487
Hamann, F., Kaplan, K. F., Hidalgo, P. R., Prochaska, J. X., & Herbert-Fort, S. 2008,MNRAS, 391, L39
Hamann, F., & Sabra, B. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series,311, AGN Physics with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, ed. G. T. Richards & P. B. Hall,203
Hamann, F., & Simon, l. 2009, ApJ(in prep.)
Hazard, C., Mackey, M. B., & Shimmins, A. J. 1963, Nature, 197, 1037
Hewett, P. C., & Foltz, C. B. 2003, AJ, 125, 1784
Hewitt, A., & Burbidge, G. 1993, ApJS, 87, 451
Hubble, E. P. 1926, ApJ, 64, 321
Jannuzi, B. T. 2009, ApJ(in prep.)
Jannuzi, B. T., Hartig, G. F., Kirhakos, S., Sargent, W. L. W., Turnshek, D. A.,Weymann, R. J., Bahcall, J. N., Bergeron, J., Boksenberg, A., Savage, B. D., Schneider,D. P., & Wolfe, A. M. 1996, ApJ, 470, L11
Laor, A., & Brandt, W. N. 2002, ApJ, 569, 641
Lundgren, B. F., Wilhite, B. C., Brunner, R. J., Hall, P. B., Schneider, D. P., York, D. G.,Vanden Berk, D. E., & Brinkmann, J. 2007, ApJ, 656, 73
Matthews, T. A., & Sandage, A. R. 1963, ApJ, 138, 30
McGreer, I. D., Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J., & White, R. L. 2006, ApJ, 652, 157
138
Menou, K., Vanden Berk, D. E., Ivezic, Z., Kim, R. S. J., Knapp, G. R., Richards, G. T.,Strateva, I., Fan, X., Gunn, J. E., Hall, P. B., Heckman, T., Krolik, J., Lupton, R. H.,Schneider, D. P., York, D. G., Anderson, S. F., Bahcall, N. A., Brinkmann, J., Brunner,R., Csabai, I., Fukugita, M., Hennessy, G. S., Kunszt, P. Z., Lamb, D. Q., Munn, J. A.,Nichol, R. C., & Szokoly, G. P. 2001, ApJ, 561, 645
Merritt, D., & Ferrarese, L. 2001, ApJ, 547, 140
Misawa, T., Charlton, J. C., Eracleous, M., Ganguly, R., Tytler, D., Kirkman, D., Suzuki,N., & Lubin, D. 2007a, ApJS, 171, 1
Misawa, T., Eracleous, M., Charlton, J. C., & Kashikawa, N. 2007b, ApJ, 660, 152
Misawa, T., Eracleous, M., Charlton, J. C., & Tajitsu, A. 2005, ApJ, 629, 115
Murray, N., Chiang, J., Grossman, S. A., & Voit, G. M. 1995, ApJ, 451, 498
Narayanan, D., Hamann, F., Barlow, T., Burbidge, E. M., Cohen, R. D., Junkkarinen, V.,& Lyons, R. 2004, ApJ, 601, 715
Nestor, D., Hamann, F., & Hidalgo, P. R. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 2055
Nestor, D. B., Turnshek, D. A., & Rao, S. M. 2005, ApJ, 628, 637
Oke, J. B. 1963, Nature, 197, 1040
Peterson, B. M. 1997, An Introduction to Active Galactic Nuclei (An introduction toactive galactic nuclei, Publisher: Cambridge, New York Cambridge University Press,1997 Physical description xvi, 238 p. ISBN 0521473489)
Prochaska, J. X. 1999, ApJ, 511, L71
Proga, D., & Kallman, T. R. 2004, ApJ, 616, 688
Proga, D., Stone, J. M., & Kallman, T. R. 2000, ApJ, 543, 686
Rees, M. J. 1984, ARA&A, 22, 471
Reichard, T. A., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., Schneider, D. P., Vanden Berk, D. E., Fan,X., York, D. G., Knapp, G. R., & Brinkmann, J. 2003, AJ, 126, 2594
Richards, G. T., Laurent-Muehleisen, S. A., Becker, R. H., & York, D. G. 2001, ApJ, 547,635
Richards, G. T., York, D. G., Yanny, B., Kollgaard, R. I., Laurent-Muehleisen, S. A., &vanden Berk, D. E. 1999, ApJ, 513, 576
Sargent, W. L. W., Boksenberg, A., & Steidel, C. C. 1988, ApJS, 68, 539
Schmidt, M. 1963, Nature, 197, 1040
139
Siemiginowska, A., & Elvis, M. 1997, ApJ, 482, L9
Silk, J., & Rees, M. J. 1998, A&A, 331, L1
Slipher, V. M. 1915, Popular Astronomy, 23, 21
Sramek, R. A., & Weedman, D. W. 1980, ApJ, 238, 435
Stocke, J. T., Morris, S. L., Weymann, R. J., & Foltz, C. B. 1992, ApJ, 396, 487
Thoul, A. A., & Weinberg, D. H. 1995, ApJ, 442, 480
Trump, J. R., Hall, P. B., Reichard, T. A., Richards, G. T., Schneider, D. P., VandenBerk, D. E., Knapp, G. R., Anderson, S. F., Fan, X., Brinkman, J., Kleinman, S. J., &Nitta, A. 2006, ApJS, 165, 1
Turnshek, D. A. 1984, ApJ, 280, 51
Turnshek, D. A. 1988, in Proceedings of the QSO Absorption Line Meeting, ed. J. C.Blades, D. A. Turnshek, & C. A. Norman, 17
Venemans, B. P., Rottgering, H. J. A., Miley, G. K., van Breugel, W. J. M., de Breuck, C.,Kurk, J. D., Pentericci, L., Stanford, S. A., Overzier, R. A., Croft, S., & Ford, H. 2007,A&A, 461, 823
Verner, D. A., Barthel, P. D., & Tytler, D. 1994, A&AS, 108, 287
Vestergaard, M. 2002, ApJ, 571, 733
Vestergaard, M. 2003, ApJ, 599, 116
Voit, G. M., Weymann, R. J., & Korista, K. T. 1993, ApJ, 413, 95
Warner, C., Hamann, F., & Dietrich, M. 2003, ApJ, 596, 72
Weymann, R. J., Carswell, R. F., & Smith, M. G. 1981, ARA&A, 19, 41
Weymann, R. J., Morris, S. L., Foltz, C. B., & Hewett, P. C. 1991, ApJ, 373, 23
Weymann, R. J., Williams, R. E., Peterson, B. M., & Turnshek, D. A. 1979, ApJ, 234, 33
Wise, J. H., Eracleous, M., Charlton, J. C., & Ganguly, R. 2004, ApJ, 613, 129
Wolfe, A. M., & Prochaska, J. X. 2000, ApJ, 545, 591
Yuan, Q., Green, R. F., Brotherton, M., Tripp, T. M., Kaiser, M. E., & Kriss, G. A. 2002,ApJ, 575, 687
Zel’Dovich, Y. B., & Novikov, I. D. 1964, Soviet Physics Doklady, 9, 246
140