Ray Konopka Introduction to the Microsoft.NET Framework for Delphi Developers.
by Shih-Chieh Kao, Rebeka Sultana, T.P. Chan Tom Konopka, Tom Cooper J. Alleman, R.S. Govindaraju
20
by Shih-Chieh Kao, Rebeka Sultana, T.P. Chan Tom Konopka, Tom Cooper J. Alleman, R.S. Govindaraju PURDUE U N I V E R S I T Y SAC MEETING SAC MEETING WETLAND PROJECTS WETLAND PROJECTS 06/07/06 06/07/06
-
Upload
whitcomb-jagger -
Category
Documents
-
view
26 -
download
1
description
SAC MEETING WETLAND PROJECTS 06/07/06. by Shih-Chieh Kao, Rebeka Sultana, T.P. Chan Tom Konopka, Tom Cooper J. Alleman, R.S. Govindaraju. P URDUE U N I V E R S I T Y. Test site. Near city of Greenfield due east of Indianapolis on I-70. Greenfield Wetland System Schematic. Effluent. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of by Shih-Chieh Kao, Rebeka Sultana, T.P. Chan Tom Konopka, Tom Cooper J. Alleman, R.S. Govindaraju
byShih-Chieh Kao, Rebeka Sultana, T.P. Chan
Tom Konopka, Tom CooperJ. Alleman, R.S. Govindaraju
PURDUE U N I V E R S I T Y
SAC MEETINGSAC MEETINGWETLAND PROJECTSWETLAND PROJECTS
06/07/0606/07/06
Test siteTest site
Near city of Greenfield
due east of Indianapolis on I-70.
W-3
M-1
ST-2 ST-1F-1
LS-3
LS-2FS
LS-1
M-2F-2
M-3
Wetland Cell(W-1)
Wetland Cell(W-2)
Biofield
AS-1AS
-4
AS
-2
AS-3
F-3
Rec
ircul
atio
nACT-1
ACT-2
NNot to scale
LS-4(To city)
LS-2
Lift station/Dosing Chamber
Automatic Sampling Station
M-4
Flume Flow meter
Effluent
Magnetic Flow meter
Weather station
V notch weir Flow meter
Flow splitter
Greenfield Wetland System SchematicGreenfield Wetland System Schematic
Treatment Performance% Removal vs. Operational Days
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Days since planting, 08/12/2003
% R
em
ov
al (
AS
1-A
S4
)
BOD TSS NH3 TSS NH3 BOD
Wetland PerformanceWetland Performance
Sampling Date
2/25/06
After 1st septic tank
At 1st
Lift
station
At 2nd
Lift
Station
Outlet
%
Rem
oval
BOD5 (mg/L)
380 235 202 142 62%
TSS (mg/L)
168 99 81 41 76%
NH4 (mg/L)
270 171 164 153 43%
Table: Wetland performanceTable: Wetland performance
20031 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21
M1M2M3M4F1 P D D D D D D D D DF2 P D D D D D D D D DF3 P D D D D D D D D D
Drinking O O OWeather P P
20041 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21
M1 P 3 3 P 3 P ? ? ? P 5 5 P P P P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OM2 P 3 3 P ? ? ? ? ? P 5 5 P ? ? P O O PM3 P 3 3 P 3 P ? ? ? P 5 5 P P P P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OM4 P 3 3 P 3 P ? ? ? P 5 5 P P P P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OF1 D D D P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OF2 D D D P O O O O O ? ? ? O O O O O O O O P P O O O O O PF3 D D D P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O P P O O O O O P P O
Drinking P P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OWeather O O P P O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
20051 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21 1 11 21
M1 O P P O O P P O O O O P P PM2 P P O O PM3 O P P O O P P O O O O P P P P O O PM4 O P P O O P P O O O O P P P P O O PF1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O P P O O O O O O O PF2F3 O P P O O O P
Drinking O O O O O O O PWeather O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O P P O O O O O O O P
M1, M2, M3, M4: Minimum Unit in Minute O: Full Data Available P: Partial Data Available ?: Questionable DataF1, F2, F3, Drink., Weather: Minimum Unit in Hour 3: 3-Min Interval 5: 5-Min Interval D: Daily Interval
Sep Oct Nov DecMay June July AugJan Feb March April
Sep Oct Nov DecMay June July Aug
Feb March April
Jan Feb March April
Sep Oct Nov DecMay June July AugJan
Credit : Shih-Chieh Kao, PhD Candidate
WETLAND DATA AVAILABILITY
Data AnalysisData Analysis
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (Days)
Flo
w (
gp
d)
F1 data
Drinking Water
June, 2004
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
100000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (Days)
Flo
w (
gp
d)
drinking water
F1 data
September, 2004Oct 22nd to Nov 22nd, 2004
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (days)
Flo
w (
gp
d)
F1 data
Drinking water
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (Days)
Flo
w (
gp
h)
F2 data
Dw data
F1 data
Data Analysis Data Analysis (Contd…)(Contd…)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (Days)
Flo
w (
gp
h)
F3 data
Dw data
October, 2004
Data Analysis Data Analysis (Contd…)(Contd…)Last 10 days in April,2004
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time(Days)
Flo
w(g
pm
)M1 data
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time(Days)
Flo
w(g
pm
)M3 data
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time(Days)
Flo
w(g
pm
)M4 data
Last 10 days in April,2004
Last 10 days in April,2004
Data Analysis Data Analysis (Contd…)(Contd…)Last 20 days in November, 2005
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (Days)
Flo
w (
gp
m)
M2 data
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time(Days)
Flo
w (
gp
m)
M2 data
Last 10 days in Oct, 2004
Hydraulic flow modelHydraulic flow model
LS-1
W-1
LS-4
LS-2
LS-3
W-2
83%
?%
?%
17%Biofield
W-3
ACTST-2
M-3
M-4
M-2
M-1
F-3
F-2
Rain
Recirculation
F-1
Greenfield city
Model InputsModel Inputs
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (Days)
Flo
w R
ate
(g
pm
), R
ain
fall
(g
pm
)
F-1 data
Rainfall
November 1 to 10, 2004
Model ResultsModel Results
5500
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (Days)
Vo
lum
e (
Cu
bic
feet)
Parallel wetlands0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (Days)
Dep
th o
f w
ater
( f
eet)
Cell 1
Cell 2
Model Results Model Results (contd…)(contd…)
600
620
640
660
680
700
720
740
760
780
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (Days)
Vo
lum
e (C
ub
ic f
eet)
Polishing wetland
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (Days)
Dep
th (
feet)
W-3
T
A
dttVV
t0
)(1
)(
Wetlands HRT η(t)
Parallel wetlandsParallel wetlands 5.48 days 0.67
Polishing wetlandsPolishing wetlands 1.1 days 0.7
Model Results Model Results (contd…)(contd…)
Volumetric efficiency:
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (Days)
Vo
lum
etr
ic e
ffic
ien
cy
Parallel Wetlands
W-3
Model ValidationModel Validation
Input Data: October 22nd to October 31st, 2004
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (days)
Flo
w R
ate
(gp
m)
F-1 Data
Rainfall
Output from F-2
Output from F-3
Model Validation Model Validation (Contd…)(Contd…)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time(days)
Flow
rat
e(gp
m)
F2-data
Simulation result
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (Days)
Flo
w R
ate
(gp
m)
F-3 data
Simulation Result
Output from M-1
Output from M-2
Model Validation Model Validation (Contd…)(Contd…)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time(days)
Flo
w R
ate
(gp
m)
M-1 data
M1-simulation result
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (Days)
Flo
w R
ate
(gp
m)
M2 data
Simulation result
Output from M-3
Output from M-4
Model Validation Model Validation (Contd…)(Contd…)
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (Days)
Flo
w R
ates
(g
pm
)
M-3 Data
Simulation Result
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (Days)
Flo
w R
ate
(g
pm
)M-4 data
Simulation Result
Items for Discussion SCADA
– Data since January 2006-who has it? How can we access it?– Training schedule & website access– Surge tank control of flow rates
PLANTS– Clyde Mason recently did some replanting…
INSTRUMENTS– Gaps in data because of equipment failure, data logger unplugged during constructions, etc.– Inherent measurement problems with instruments– Recycle pumps not working (May 22, 2006)
BIOFIELD– No samples available, except for once in the deepest well– Supply to biofield should be shut off.
DATA AVAILABILITY– Should raw data be put on website?– Or this presentation enough detail.
REPORTS– Under preparation– Any suggestions?– Will seek feedback
OTHER ?
