By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial &...
-
Upload
marco-duckett -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial &...
![Page 1: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Improvement of Comfort for Flat-Footed People
By Semaj RashadIEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design
Dr. B. KattelDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering
Morgan State UniversityFall 2011
![Page 2: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
AgendaObjectivesMethodologyBackground and IntroductionProblem DefinitionMaterialsResults and DiscussionConclusionReferences
![Page 3: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ObjectivesRecognize and see the concepts of applied
ergonomics studies in an experiment.Recognize and see the concepts of a Body
Part Discomfort Survey in an experiment.To practice anthropometric body
measurement investigationsTo practice the general systems approach to
ergonomics
![Page 4: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MethodologyStatic Anthropometry
Foot LengthScientific Management Adaptation
Does a problem exist?Analysis of ProblemSearch for Possible SolutionsEvaluate AlternativesRecommend SolutionImplement solution
![Page 5: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
BackgroundAnthropometry – body dimensions and
measurementsStatic Anthropometry- body measured
without motion. Foot Length – Distance from the back of the
heel to tip of longest toe (parallel to the long axis of the foot)
Bio-mechanical Approach – determine forces exerted on musculoskeletal system
Flat-footed or fallen arches - low arch or no arch at all
![Page 6: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
IntroductionEach foot is an
intricate structure:26 bones33 joints107 ligaments19 muscles2 arches31 tendons7,000 nerve endings125,000 sweat glands
Arch provides elastic, springy connection between the forefoot and the hindfoot.
This relationship ensures that most of the forces incurred during weight bearing can be dissipated before reaching the long bones of the leg and thigh.
![Page 7: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
IntroductionWithout support problems can develop with
lower body: knees, hips and lower backThe biomechanical theory is that the arch-
support orthotic will provide biomechanical support to the foundation of the body (the feet) will improve lower-extremity and whole-body
alignment/biomechanics.
![Page 8: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Problem DefinitionSubject A and B, both with
fallen arches or flat feet, experience periodic pain in their feet, mostly located around the archThey have been
recommended by doctors to try shoe inserts or insoles
This study seeks to find the shoe insert that is the most comfortable solution
![Page 9: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
MaterialsCompared 5 arch support orthotic (shoe
insert) brandsArch Pro-TecBirkenstock Arch SupportsDr. Rosenberg’s Instant ArchesSorbothane Ultra Orthotic ArchShock Doctor – Ultra 2 Insole
3 types of shoes used per user
![Page 10: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Procedure1. Wear each shoe with each arch-support
orthotic for 1 full day2. Rate the comfort of the arch-support
orthotic On a scale from 1-5 (1: very uncomfortable –
5: very comfortable) Provide comments
3. Answer follow-up questions about the experience with each arch-support orthotic
![Page 11: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
User AUser A Profile Male, 24, 5’5”, 150
lbs., Shoe size = 9 men’s
![Page 12: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Shoes worn for User AShoes:•dress shoe•sneaker (high top)•sneaker (low top)
![Page 13: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
User BUser B Profile:Female, 24, 5’4”, 130 lbs.Shoe size = 8.5 women’s
![Page 14: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Shoes worn for User B
![Page 15: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Arch Support Orthotics TestedArch Pro Tec Birkenstock
![Page 16: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Arch Support Orthotics TestedDr. Rosenberg Sorbothane
![Page 17: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Arch Support Orthotics TestedShock Doctor
![Page 18: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Comfort Ratings Table
Raw Data of Comfort Ratings (on a scale of 1-5) Taken during months of October – November User performed numerous day-to-day tasks including walking,
working, sitting, etc. with the various arch support orthotics
![Page 19: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Comfort Ratings Graph
![Page 20: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Statistical Analysis
Most favorable based on Combined Average Ratings:1. Sorbothane2. Shock Doctor3. Dr. Rosenberg4. Birkenstock5. Arch Pro-Tec
![Page 21: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Sample Survey Responses From UsersUser B on Arch Pro-Tec (wearing black boots)
They felt tight around my arch, but I don’t feel like it improved anything.
User A on Birkenstock (wearing dress shoes)mild comfort, felt tight in the shoe (not enough room)
User B on Dr. Rosenberg’s (wearing black boots)I could feel them under my arch which felt akward and made
my foot hurt after a while. I had to remove them before the end of the day
User A on Sorbothane (wearing black low top sneakers)Eomfortable, barely noticed they were there…no discomfort at
any period of the day.
User B on Shock Doctor (sneakers)Entire foot felt great…I recommend only wearing in sneakers
![Page 22: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Conclusions and RecommendationsBased on the surveys and experimental analysis Sorbothane
Ultra Orthotic Arches are recommended for users with fallen arches or flat feet.Received the highest average comfort ratings for various types
of shoes Applicable to various industries:
Manufacturing where one may be standing for an extended period U.S. Army where walking for an extended period of time has kept flat
footed individuals out in some cases
![Page 23: By Semaj Rashad IEGR 360: Ergonomics and Workplace Design Dr. B. Kattel Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering Morgan State University Fall 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070306/551805c255034637138b458e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
References Flat Feet - NHS Choices. (n.d.). NHS Choices. Retrieved November 28, 2011, from
http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/flatfeet/Pages/Introduction.aspx Flat Feet - Symptoms. (2010, April 2). NHS Choices. Retrieved November 28, 2011,
from http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/flatfeet/Pages/Symptomspage.aspx Foot Facts. (2008). Synergy Massaging Insoles. Retrieved November 28, 2011, from
http://www.synergymedicalproducts.com/Facts.html Franco, A. H. (n.d.). Pes Cavus and Pes Planus : Analyses and Treatment. Journal of
American Physical Therapy Association. Retrieved November 28, 2011, from http://www.physther.net/content/67/5/688.full.pdf+html
Kavros, S. J., Van Straaten, M. G., Coleman Wood, K. A., & Kaufman, K. R. (2011, March 16). Forefoot plantar pressure reduction of off-the-shelf rocker bottom provisional footwear. Clinical Biomechanics. Retrieved November 28, 2011, from http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy-um.researchport.umd.edu/science?_ob=MiamiImageURL
Kelaher, D., Mirka, G. A., & Dudziak, K. Q. (2000). Effects of semi-rigid arch-support orthotics: an investigation with potential ergonomic implications. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 515-522.
Nigg, B. M., Nurse, M. A., & Stefanyshyn, D. J. (1999). Shoe inserts and orthotics for sport and physical activities : Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Medicine Science in Sports Exercise. Retrieved November 28, 2011, from http://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/Fulltext/1999/07001/Shoe_inserts_and_orthotics_for_sport_and_physical.3.aspx