Burger’s Daughter This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create...
-
Upload
phebe-mcdaniel -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
7
Transcript of Burger’s Daughter This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create...
Overview
This is a story of a woman named Rosa Burger born in South Africa
She is the daughter of two white, anti-apartheid activists both of whom are arrested for their activism and communism
Both of Rosa’s parents die, her father dies while he is in prison
Overview con’t
There was an expectation that Rosa would follow in her parent’s foot steps
Rosa was uncertain of the direction of her life
She tries to travel, study law etc but she is on “a list” that restricts her movements and opportunities
Her brother drowns in the pool and her adopted black brother, Baasie, disappears
Overview con’t
Rosa eventually gets a passport and travels to Europe
While in London she is re-united with her adopted brother Baasie
She eventually returns to South Africa and is arrested in 1977 because she is on “the list”
Strangers in Their Own Country
“A ‘place’; somewhere to belong, but also something that establishes one’s lot and sets aside much to which one doesn’t belong.” (149)
‘house’/’home’ vs. ‘place’: the language suggests the barriers that exist between the white activists and the black South Africans
Strangers con’t
Even the white activists, who are under surveillance by their own country, are still more at home
Black South African boxers have to fight as foreigners against white South Africans– “he has to fight as a stranger in his own
country, a foreigner, he’s a ‘Zulu’ or a ‘Msutu’, not a South African like the white.” (152)
– This concept can be applied to black South Africans in general
Strangers con’t
“the physical divide of clean streets become rutted roads and city centres become veld dumped with twisted metal and perpetual autumn of blowing paper” (149)
The fundamental division between white and black South Africans prevents white activists from truly understanding the hardships that the blacks face
Strangers con’t
Rosa, of her understanding of the way of life in these neighbourhoods, says, “I used to know, or think I knew” (150)– She is beginning to re-evaluate and
question her understanding of life as a black South African – the understanding she thought she had because of her connection to their community via her white activist parents
“White Liberalism” vs. Black Nationalism:Orde Greer defines white liberalism:
“white liberalism will sacrifice the long odds on attaining social justice and settle for letting blacks into the exploiting class. The ‘enlightened’ government crowd will sacrifice the long odds on maintaining complete white supremacy and settle for propping up a black middle class whose class interests run counter to a black revolution.” (156)
Black Nationalism
Duma Dhladhla:He does not want help from whites:
“we don’t need their solutions.” (163)
“All collaboration with whites has always ended in exploitation of blacks”
• Eg. Black police
A Race Struggle or a Class Struggle:Duma Dhladhla:– Lumps all whites together and all
blacks together– “It’s not a class struggle for blacks,
it’s a race struggle” (163)– It is all whites’ intention to exploit
blacks, even if they don’t know it
Race Struggle con’t
Rosa’s activist parents were communists and were convinced that oppression was the result of class conflict– “in that house where I grew up there
was no guilt because it was believed it was a ruling class and not a colour that whiles assumed responsibility. It wasn’t something bleached into the flesh” (161)
Race Struggle con’t
However, there is a contradiction here because her family was of a higher social class, yet they did not feel guilty as members of the ruling class
Rosa – The Trouble with Activism
Gordimer provides detailed background on Lionel’s work for the anti-apartheid movement
A legacy for Rosa to be a leader of the movement?
The refusal of the savior complexRosa’s relationship with the
activist movement
The Trouble with Activism con’t
Her resistance to the conflation of her father as a martyr of the movement
Unavoidable celebration of Lionel Burger’s life, no matter where Rosa travels
“…whatever you whites touch, it’s a takeover” (321)’
The Trouble with Activism con’t
Gordimer shows the problems of activism for the sake of the disenfranchised. Do white voices overpower the black population advocating for their own rights?
Rosa’s Relationship with Men
The nature of Rosa’s relationship with various men reflect an important theme in the book
Theme: the struggle between the public and the private self, between social vs. personal needs
Noel De Witt
An associate of her father’s that she had to pretend to be engaged to so that he could pass along information to her father through her
Rosa’s duty as a daughter helping out her father’s cause, to play her role, vs. the real feelings she had for Noel
Noel De Witt con’t
“I did…what was expected. I was not a fake. Once a month I sat as they had sent me to take their messages and receive his, a female presented to him with the smiling mouth, the gazing yet evasive eyes, the breasts drooping a little as she hunched forward, a flower standing for what lies in her lap.” (68)
Conrad
One of the “hangers-on” of the Burger household who eventually becomes one of Rosa’s lovers, part one of the book addresses him
Not affiliated with any politics, very egocentric, fascinated with what went on in the Burger household, contrasts Rosa’s family always living for their cause, for their revolution, with hi own upbringing, living for himself alone
Conrad con’t
He says to her, “I have the impression you’ve grown up entirely through other people. What they told you was appropriate to feel and do. How did you begin to know yourself? You go through the motions…what’s expected of you.” (46)
Conrad’s self-centeredness is juxtaposed with the expectations that Rosa is supposed to fulfill
Marcus “the Swede”
Another of Rosa’s lovers, who comes to South Africa because he wanted to make a film about Lionel Burger
Rosa has a physical relationship with him, no emotion involved
Marcus con’t
“Perhaps, from his safety, from his welfare state where left-wing views did not imply any endangering action, being the lover of Lionel Burger’s daughter for a month or two was the nearest he would ever get to the barricades. I don’t mind. What else was I?” (64
Rosa feels that in her relationship with him, she is also fulfilling a role, as Marcus’ outlet for rebellion, as a way of getting closer to Lionel Burger
Bernard Chabalier
Rosa’s final lover, whom she actually falls in love with and who urges her to go into permanent exile in France so they can be together.
He tells her, “There’s plenty you can do, Rosa. In Paris, in London, for that matter. Enough for a lifetime. If you must….I want to say to you, you can’t enter someone else’s cause or salvation…” (297)
Bernard con’tAgain, Rosa cannot give into her
personal desire to be with Bernard, cannot fully separate herself from her duties to her country
Also, it is important that Bernard is already married. Rosa says, “There’s nothing more private and personal than the life of a mistress, is there? Outwardly, no one even knows we are responsible to each other. Bernard Chabalier’s mistress isn’t Lionel Burger’s daughter…” (304)
Style
What were your impressions after reading the excerpt?
Were you confused by the dialogue?
Were you able to get a sense of what was going on?
Response to Gordimer’s Literary StyleChallengingConfusingFrustratingDisturbingSlowed the pace of reading
Why did She Choose This Style?
Why did I choose this book? What did I expect?
I wanted to read about the anti-apartheid movement
I expected it to be about– Protests– Violence & confrontation(al)– I expected the author and/or the
subjects to be black
Style
Two most striking features:
1. How Gordimer writes conversation– No quotations makes the dialogue
between characters confusing– Difficult to distinguish between
dialogue, narration & thoughts
2. Internalization of individual perspective
Reason for Style Choice
Main character Rosa is drifting with no anchor to community
Looking for her own place as an individual, separate from the identity of her parents
Uncertain of her loyalties and what direction she wants her life to take
Reason for Style ChoiceThe dialogue gives the reader
impression of floating in & out of conversation
She is present but not truly part of any conversation
Reflects her life, she is not truly loyal to any doctrine despite expectations
Without routes because of the death of her parents and loss of her adopted brother, Baasie
Growing up in the shadow of her father, the hero
Overall Effect
SubtleGordimer brings racial conflict & the
anti-apartheid movement to a personal level
Book does not deal with the public exhibit of protests, riots or abuse
Details the personal effect of racism & the examination of Rosa’s life illuminates the political movement of anti-apartheid
Racism
Subtle effects of race issues hidden around every corner in imagery & events–Man tries to pick her pocket in France– Drives by location of her house– The sound of gravel crunching– Rosa’s trip to Europe– Donkey being mercilessly whipped
Loyalty & BetrayalLoyalty & Betrayal are themes found
throughout the novelActivists make excuses for her lack of
loyalty to the causeFriend’s who were loyal to her father and
went to prisonFather was acquitted and felt betrayedFather could have been Prime Minister if
he hadn’t been a traitorRosa’s struggle with commitment to
“family” and community
Black NationalismThe debate over black athletes in South
Africa: should they strive to join white leagues or form their own?– Serves as an analogy for blacks in South
African society in generalShould blacks strive for equality with
whites or for the black nationalist ideals of black pride and independence?
Should blacks liberate themselves or should they accept the help of white activists? Do they require the help of white activists?