Building Innovative Curriculum

download Building Innovative Curriculum

of 17

  • date post

  • Category


  • view

  • download


Embed Size (px)


Workshop session on "How Schools Build Innovative Curriculum" from the Independent Curriculum Group conference, "Re-Imagining High School," October 27, 2009 at Beaver Country Day School in Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.

Transcript of Building Innovative Curriculum

  • 1. Building Innovative Curriculum How Schools Create Conditions forREALProgram Improvement Peter Gow Emily JonesDeb Merriam Director of College Counseling Director Academic Dean Beaver Country Day Putney School Francis W. Parker School Charter Essential School ICG Boston 2009

2. Traditional Sources of Curriculum

  • Favored textbooks
  • State or professional organization standards
  • Expectations sussed out of standardized tests
  • Predecessors
  • Brainwaves and instant insights
  • Independent schools notorious for textbook-driven curriculum, lack of specific faculty training in curriculum and assessment design

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 3. The Question

  • How can schools can develop a culture of curriculum development that includes the entire faculty, and how can a shared vision inspire everyone in the community?

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 4. Past Reasons for Curricular Change

  • Evolution of textbooks
  • Hot topics and enthusiasms of the momentespecially in humanities
  • Understood changes in standardized testing expectations (AP, Achievements, SAT)
  • Sometimes, perceived pressure from families and marketplace
  • New blood

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 5. Curriculum Since the 1980s

  • Informed by new understandings of development, intelligence and cognition (Gardner, Sternberg, a host of others)
  • Builds on foundational work of Piaget, Erikson, Bruner, Kohlberg, Perkins et al.
  • Assessment-driven, intentionally designed (backwards design); debt to Sizer and Coalition
  • Understanding-based: Wiggins (Understanding by Design), Project Zero (Teaching for Understanding)
  • Project-based, problem-based, authentic, experiential, multigenre

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 6. Institutional Pre-conditions

  • A sense of needpreferably a desire to move forward educationally
  • A culture of professional respect
  • A truly shared understanding of institutional mission, values, and aims
  • Ideally a professional development program already keyed to this understanding

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 7. Needed: An Over-arching Idea (along with the school mission, of course)

  • Change must be developed under a single comprehensible rubric: 21 st -century learning, UbD, TfU, Coalition principles
  • Idea must compel faculty, either as goal or means (stimulating/engaging for them, keep desks full, teach the kids you want to be teaching, itll be betteror even easier)
  • Idea must be accessible to families and students, as well

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 8. Steps to Change

  • Develop professional culture based on shared purposes and shared understandings of how children learn
  • Create conditions that maximize faculty interaction and conversation around professional and pedagogical matters
  • Create climate of mutual trust between aims of institution (administration and governors) and role of faculty in achieving these aims
  • Acknowledge that change is hard

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 9. Needed: Resources

  • Leadershipcredible, respected, acknowledged
  • Timefor learning, collaboration, piloting, evaluation, conversation
  • Materialscollaborative tools, texts
  • Expertisein-house or consulting
  • Permissionto try things that dont work as well as planned or hoped for (but not permission to opt out)
  • Timefor listening and reflecting
  • Accountability structures

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 10. Link curriculum vision to school mission

  • What are your schools goals?
    • Social justice?
    • Environmental sustainability?
    • Competence in problem solving?
    • College admissions?
    • Individual expression?
  • What are your underlying premises about learning?

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 11. Premise 1:Institutional and personal tolerance of ambiguity is necessary for curriculum growth and modeling this is good for students.

  • Levels of tolerance of ambiguity are correlated with
      • Creativity
      • Psychological resilience
      • Intercultural competence

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 12. Premise 2: Executive Function is a key component of learning, and can be learned.

  • Major functions:
  • Planning for the future and strategic thinking
  • The ability to inhibit or delay responding
  • Initiating behavior
  • Shifting between activities flexibly
  • Skills:
      • Plan
      • Sequence
      • Prioritize
      • Organize
      • Initiate
      • Inhibit
      • Pace
      • Shift
      • Self-monitor
      • Control emotion
      • Complete

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 13.

  • Premise 3:

The tradition of separating the study of humanity (the social sciences and humanities) from the study of the rest of the world (the natural sciences) is at least partly to blame for our inability to think intelligently about how we live on the planet. The greatest enterprise of the mind has always been and always will be the attempted linkage of the sciences and the humanities.E.O. Wilson October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 14.

  • How is it all going to come out ???

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 15. Project based learning

  • Allows for interdisciplinary (non-disciplinary) learning
  • Teaches and assesses executive function
  • Requires, and models, tolerance of ambiguity
  • There is no discipline in the world so severe as the discipline of experience subjected to the tests of intelligent development and direction
  • ~ John Dewey

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 16. October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum 17. Questions for groups

  • What's one example of curriculum you've designed that in your mind really hits the mark?
  • What conditions or structures were in place to support this happening?
  • Finally, what is one thing you want the other groups (teachers/dept heads/admins) here to know about your group?

October 27, 2009 ICG--Innovative Curriculum