Building Hedge Fund Portfolios Capable of Generating ...€¦ · Capable of Generating Absolute...

Building Hedge Fund Portfolios Capable of Generating Absolute Return within Stressful Market Environments

October 20, 2011 Paul Lucek SSARIS Advisors, LLC

SSARIS Advisors, LLC • Wilton Corporate Centre • Courtside Building, Suite 2C • 187 Danbury Road • Wilton, CT 06897 Investor Relations: (203)328-7200 | Fax: (203)328-7299 | Internet: www.ssaris.com | email: [email protected]

Presented to:

2

Introduction and Firm Summary

• Majority owned by State Street Global Alliance and minority owned by SSARIS’ Executive Management

• State Street Global Alliance is a wholly owned subsidiary of State Street Corporation

• Approximately $1.7 billon* in assets under management

• Clients include pensions, endowments, institutional and other types of investors

• $2.0 trillion*† in assets under management

• The investment management division of State Street Corporation

• $21.5 trillion* in assets under custody (State Street Bank and Trust Company)

• Leading hedge fund service provider with front-to-back office administration and risk solutions

* As of December 31, 2010. All values expressed in USD unless otherwise noted. † This AUM includes the assets of the SPDR Gold Trust (approx. $58 billion as of December 31, 2010), for which State Street Global Markets, LLC, an affiliate of State Street Global Advisors, serves as the marketing agent.

3

Journal of Alternative Investments, 2004

4

Balancing Convergence & Divergence:

• Correlation is zero in normal circumstances

• Correlation turns negative in period of stress / crisis

• Opposite tail events coincide

• Combination yields more normal return distribution with less tail risk

The information contained above is for illustrative purposes only.

5

Asset Class Diversification:

Convertible Arb Distressed

Equity Hedge Equity Non-Hedge

Market Neutral Event Driven

Relative Value Arb

Fixed Income Commodities Equities Currencies

Convertible Arb Distressed

Event Driven Fixed Inc. Arbitrage Mortgage Backed Relative Value Arb

Managed Futures / Global Macro / CTAs

6

Data sources:

• Hedge Fund Indices: – Hedge Fund Research Inc. ( www.hedgefundresearch.com )

• Benchmark portfolio (50% stocks / 50% bonds) – Bloomberg

– S&P 500® Total Return Index – Merrill Lynch 5-7 Year Constant Duration US Treasury Index

• CTA returns – Bloomberg

– Barclay CTA Index – CASAM / CISDM Asset Weighted CTA Index

• Time period is 21 years ( Jan – 1990 through Dec – 2010 )

7

Benchmark 50 / 50 portfolio:

• Benchmark is: – 50% S&P 500 ® Total Return Index – 50% Merrill Lynch 5-7 Year Constant Duration US Treasury Index

8

0.1

1.0

10.0

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

valu

e of $

1 in

vest

ed (lo

garit

hmic

scal

e)

1990: First Gulf war -14.67%

1998: Asian currency crisis / Russian debt default -15.35%

2000-2002: Tech bubble -44.71%

2008: Credit crisis -50.95%

Benchmark – S&P 500® Total Return Index:

Source: Bloomberg, L.P.

9

Benchmark: Merrill Lynch 5-7 yr Gov’t Bond Index:

0.1

1.0

10.0

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

valu

e of $

1 in

vest

ed (lo

garit

hmic

scal

e)

1990: First Gulf war +4.83%

1998: Asian currency crisis / Russian debt default +3.19%

2000-2002: Tech bubble +26.68%

2008: Credit crisis +16.10%


10

Benchmark: 50%/50% S&P500® & ML Bond Index:


0.1

1.0

10.0

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

valu

e of

$1

inve

sted

(log

arith

mic

sca

le)

1990: First Gulf war -7.00%

1998: Asian currency crisis / Russian debt default -6.04%

2000-2002: Tech bubble -14.36%

2008: Credit crisis -23.49%

1994: Fed rate hike -5.97%

11

Benchmark Performance Characteristics:

• 8.22 % annualized return

• 7.85 % annualized standard deviation

• 1.05 return / risk ratio

• Maximum drawdown: -23.49 % (in 2008)

• Average drawdown: -2.60 %

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Jan – 1990 through Dec – 2010

(50%/50% S&P500 & ML Bond Index)

12

Benchmark distribution of monthly returns:

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

-10% -9

%

-8%

-7%

-6%

-5%

-4%

-3%

-2%

-1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%

Mor

e

Freq

uenc

y

Return

-0.40 skewness




Benchmark distribution of monthly returns: (50%/50% S&P500 & ML Bond Index)

13

Equity: HFRI Equity Hedge (Total) Index HFRI Equity Market Neutral Index HFRI Quantitative Directional

Emerging Markets: HFRI Emerging Markets (Total) Index

Event driven: HFRI Event-Driven (Total) Index HFRI Distressed/Restructuring Index HFRI Merger Arbitrage Index

Relative value: HFRI Relative Value (Total) Index

HFRI Fixed Income-Convertible Arbitrage Index HFRI Fixed Income-Corporate Index

FOF: HFRI Fund of Funds Composite Index

Macro: HFRI Macro (Total) Index

HFRI Macro: Systematic Diversified Index

CTA Macro: Barclay CTA Index

CASAM/CISDM Asset Weighted CTA Index

Benchmark: S&P500® TR Index / ML 5-7yr bond Index (50%/50%)

Data sources:

14

Hedge fund returns:

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

16.00%PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS


Index returns are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses. Index returns reflect all items of income, gain and loss and the reinvestment of dividends and other income.

15

Hedge fund return / risk ratio:

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50




16

Hedge fund correlations to benchmark:

-0.10

0.10

0.30

0.50

0.70

0.90




17

Hedge fund skewness of monthly returns:

-3.50-3.25-3.00-2.75-2.50-2.25-2.00-1.75-1.50-1.25-1.00-0.75-0.50-0.250.000.250.500.75




18

Benchmark 50 / 50 portfolio vs. 45 / 45 / 10:

• Benchmark is: – 50% S&P 500 ® Total Return Index – 50% Merrill Lynch 5-7 Year Constant Duration US Treasury Index

• Comparison is to: – 45% S&P 500 ® Total Return Index – 45% Merrill Lynch 5-7 Year Constant Duration US Treasury Index – 10% Hedge Fund Strategy

19

Annualized return relative to benchmark:

-0.25%

0.00%

0.25%

0.50%

0.75%




20

Reduction in standard deviation vs. benchmark:

-0.25%

0.00%

0.25%

0.50%

0.75%

1.00%PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS



21

Increase in Return / Risk ratio vs. benchmark:

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16




22

Maximum drawdown relative to benchmark:

-2.00%

-1.00%

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%




23

Average drawdown relative to benchmark:

-0.40%

-0.30%

-0.20%

-0.10%

0.00%

0.10%

0.20%

0.30%

0.40%

0.50%

0.60%

0.70%




24

Relative performance Aug-1990 to Sep-1990:

-1.50%

-1.00%

-0.50%

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

-7.00%



25

Relative performance Jan-1994 to May-1994:

-0.40%

-0.20%

0.00%

0.20%

0.40%

0.60%

0.80%

1.00%

1.20%

-5.97%



26

Relative performance Jul-1998 to Aug-1998:

-2.00%

-1.50%

-1.00%

-0.50%

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

-6.14%



27

Relative performance Apr-2000 to Sep-2002:

-2.00%

-1.00%

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

-14.36%



28

Relative Performance in 2008:

-2.00%

-1.00%

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

-13.89%



29

• Early academic foundation

• Significant positive skewness characteristcs

• Unusually good performance in period of negative benchmark performance

Why do CTAs have such beneficial effects on tail risk?

30

Early Academic Foundation - 1983

• Professor John K. Lintner of Harvard University

• “The Potential Role of Managed Commodity-Financial Futures Accounts (and/or Funds) in Portfolios of Stocks and Bonds”

– “The improvements from holding an efficiently-selected portfolio of managed

accounts or funds are so large, and the correlation between returns on the futures portfolios and those on the stock and bond portfolios are so low (sometimes even negative), that the return/risk tradeoffs provided by augmented portfolios…clearly dominate the tradeoffs available from portfolio of stocks alone or from a portfolio of stocks and bonds.”

31

Shift in skewness relative to benchmark:

-20.00%

-15.00%

-10.00%

-5.00%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%




32

Performance during benchmark’s lowest decile:

-55%-50%-45%-40%-35%-30%-25%-20%-15%-10%

-5%0%5%

10%15%20%25%




33

Managed Futures / CTA Strategies:

• Liquid (monthly, no lockups / gating)

• Transparent (managed accounts)

• Uncorrelated alpha (negatively correlated in periods of stress)

34

Building HF portfolios capable of generating absolute return within stressful market environments:

• Balance convergent and divergent investing approaches.

• Avoid mean-variance optimizations (and optimizations in general).

• Be careful of correlations that increase during crisis events.

• Consider portfolio skewness (try to minimize tail risk, coincidental drawdowns).

• There are multiple pathways to building the desired portfolio.

35

One possible portfolio:

• Equity exposure : – S&P 500 ® Index – HFRI Market Neutral Index

• Fixed Income exposure: – Merrill Lynch 5 – 7 year US Treasury Index – HFRI Relative Value Index

• Divergent exposure – CASAM / CISDM Asset Weighted CTA Index


36

One possible portfolio:

• Equity exposure : – S&P 500 ® Index 15 % – HFRI Market Neutral Index 25 %

• Fixed Income exposure: – Merrill Lynch 5 – 7 year US Treasury Index 20 % – HFRI Relative Value Index 20 %

• Divergent exposure – CASAM / CISDM Asset Weighted CTA Index 20%


37

Sample portfolio vs. benchmark:

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

valu

e of $

1 in

vest

ed

1990: First Gulf war

1998: Asian currency crisis

2000-2002: Tech bubble

2008: Credit crisis

1994: Fed rate hike

+7.76%

+5.47%

+3.86%

+22.34%

+15.09%

Benchmark Sample portfolio

Ann. return: 8.22% 8.95% Ann. Stdev.: 7.85% 3.81%

Ret./Risk ratio: 1.05 2.35

Max drawdown: -23.49% -9.94%

Avg. drawdown: -2.60% -0.53% Skewness: -0.4006 0.0135

The information contained above is for illustrative purposes only. Hypothetical returns are based upon estimates and reflect subjective judgments and assumptions. These results were achieved by means of a mathematical formula and do not reflect the effect of unforeseen economic and market factors on decision-making. The hypothetical returns are not necessarily indicative of future performance, which could differ substantially.

38

Disclaimers:

• HFRI Indexes are not investable (but HFRX history is much shorter).

• Model performance results have inherent limitations.

• The allocations presented involve substantial strategy concentrations.

Thank You

40

Important Disclosures:

Sample benchmarks sample portfolio return streams represent model performance. Model performance does not represent the profit or loss resulting from actual trades. Rather, this model performance was generated by applying different investment allocations to various indices (the “Sample Benchmark”), and then combining the Sample Benchmark with the return stream of various indexes. Model performance results have inherent limitations, such as being prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, model trading does not involve financial risk and no model trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points that can adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program that cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of model performance results and all of which can adversely affect actual trading results. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. This document is being provided per your request. No offer of any interest in any product will be made in any jurisdiction in which offer, solicitation or sale is not authorized, or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer, solicitation or sale. This document expresses the views of SSARIS Advisors, LLC only through the date of the last performance reporting period shown regarding the Strategy and the views are subject to change based on market or other conditions. The opinions expressed are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations but rather, a basis from which strategies can be built, taking into account the specific objectives of each portfolio, in terms of return, time horizon, and risk constraints, as well as diverging investment perspectives and assumptions. All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. No current or prospective client should assume that future performance will be profitable, or equal to the performance results reflected in any of the benchmarks or indices shown. All the historical benchmark and index performance results shown are provided exclusively for comparison purposes only, so as to provide general comparative information to assist an individual client or prospective client in determining whether the performance of a SSARIS Strategy meets, or continues to meet their investment objective(s). It should not be assumed that the SSARIS Strategy holdings will correspond directly, or indirectly, to the comparative benchmarks or indices shown.

Building Hedge Fund Portfolios Capable of Generating ...€¦ · Capable of Generating Absolute...

Documents

Transcript of Building Hedge Fund Portfolios Capable of Generating ...€¦ · Capable of Generating Absolute...