Building Common Ground on Climate Change:A process in the Twin Cities Area Transportation Study (TwinCATS)

Gautam Mani, Transportation Planner, SWMPC

OutlineGrant processFirst public meeting and challengesLessons learned and second public

meetingFinal Report Emerging tools and next steps

Community Selection & Contact Meeting

Community Conversations 1 & 2

Stakeholder Interviews

Audit Tool Completion

Final Meeting

Process

Sept.

‘12

Feb./May

‘13

Jun. ‘13

Jun. ‘13Aug. ‘13

Part of a National network of regional centers focused on climate change adaptation

Climatologists, social scientists, outreach specialists

GLISA funded MSU project team to work with two Michigan communities for one year

Why the TwinCATS Area ?Coastal Location

Strong Tourism and Agricultural Sectors

Potential Vulnerability to Major Precipitation Events

Gauging Public Attitudes: Meeting #1

Wide-Ranging Opinions Expressed“One of the greatest risks is that planners will

overreact, over-regulate and infringe on industrial liberties.”

“Our time as a species is almost over, as feedback loops wreak havoc with everything we depend on- water, air, soils, stability, etc.”

“An opportunity for increased localism and better cooperation between individuals, along with better health outcomes.”

Lessons learned Better establish what TwinCATS/SWMPC do

and the role that climate change plays (Read: Take control of process).

More time needed for members of the public to engage with substantive

Address personal attacks by “disarming with data”

Preparation for the Second Meeting

Land UseWater & Public Health

Food & Agricultu

re

Tourism &

Economy

Preparation for Second MeetingAgriculture/Food Concerns

Best Practices: What Municipal Governments Can Do With Your Support

Transportation Considerations

Drought Tree species that require an abundance of moisture could be replaced in urban forests with species that are drought-resistant. Replace monocultures with polycultures (multiple species instead of one) along streets and arterial corridors to counteract tree deaths from drought

Correct tree placement reduces street maintenance costs by reducing repair (surface destabilization from roots) and clean-up costs (leaves, fruits, and branches) associated with inappropriately-placed species

Availability/Access to Food Identify areas within the region that could be used for additional Farmers Markets and seek out additional community, municipal, and regional collaborators, as well as local markets and growers. This way, food supply is less likely to be interrupted during extreme events

Temporary road closures, detours, and short-term conversion of parking areas to market areas; smaller local shipments to local markets rather than large semi-truck loads from major distribution centers

Amend ordinances and plans, as well as economic development funding practices to allow food production within urban areas

May lead municipalities to install porous pavement that captures run-off before sediment, fertilizer, and pesticides end up in storm and/or sanitary sewers

Photo source: Don Campbell/ Herald Palladium Staff 2013

Geneva Township. Photo Source: FOX17 News.

Meeting #2: Framing the Issue

Meeting #2: Framing the Issue

Meeting #2: Framing the Issue

Change inMean

Temperature (°F)

from 1951-1980 to

1981-2010

Annual 0.9

Winter 1.9

Spring 1.1

Summer 0.6

Fall 0.2

Meeting #2: Framing the Issue

Change in Mean Total Precipitation

(%) from1951-1980 to 1981-

2010

Annual 8.0

Winter 7.5

Spring 3.6

Summer 4.8

Fall 17.1

Meeting #2: Prioritizing Issues and Actions

Meeting #2: Prioritizing Issues and Actions

Meeting #2: Prioritizing Issues and Actions

Top 5 Best Practices

# Best PracticeSupport Category

1 Maintain diversity of native of crops/trees 15 Agriculture/Food

2Enhance: pedestrian environment; non-motorized paths; access to marinas

10 Tourism/Economy

3 Critical habitat: identify, acquire, protect 10 Public Health/Water

4 Promote public transit 8 Tourism/Economy

5 Utilize water resources more efficiently 7 Public Health/Water

Additional Resources in Final Report

Next Steps for the MPOOverlay vulnerable areas map layers with other features (i.e. schools, planned transit fixed routes, development footprint)

Perform feasibility analysis for transportation best practices

Develop project evaluation criteria (i.e. provisions for particularly vulnerable populations, floodplain development rationale, etc.)

Emerging Tools

http://graham.umich.edu/glaac/great-lakes-atlas

Emerging Tools

http://www.resilientmonroe.org/

Emerging ToolsInfrastructure Scenario Scenario Scenario

Located in the Floodplain1?

Flooding expected due to

100-year, 24-hour storm2?

Flooding expected due to storm event 50% greater than

column 23

Sewage Treatment Plant

Power gridDrinking Water Reservoirs/Tanks

Significant Roadways (e.g., evacuation)

Railways/evacuation routes

Petroleum/chemical storage facilities

Total Check Marks (infrastructure)

http://www.seagrant.umn.edu/newsletter/2013/01/getting_real_about_climate_change.html

Thank you! Questions?

Gautam Manimanig@swmpc.org 269-925-1137 x 24