Build an enterprise social collaboration strategy
-
Upload
info-tech-research-group -
Category
Technology
-
view
7.996 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Build an enterprise social collaboration strategy
Build an Enterprise Social Collaboration Strategy
Practical IT Research that Drives Measurable Results
Introduction
Employees are already avid users of social media for communicating with friends and family; however, most firms are unsure of how (or even if) social tools should be added to internal collaboration platforms.
Managers must recognize that social tools are powerful enablers of knowledge-sharing and productivity in the “age of the team.” Teams require tools that enable them to self-assemble resources and knowledge
needed to do their jobs: managers must support a strategy that effectively leverages social collaboration tools for employee interaction, as well as traditional collaboration tools.
Understand social
collaboration and how it builds team
effectiveness.
Develop a strategy for
enabling social collaboration patterns with technology.
Understand the major vendors
and feature sets for social tools.
Foster a culture that encourages the use of social
collaboration tools.
This solution set will help you:
Info-Tech Research Group 2
This research is ideal for:
IT and business managers creating an enterprise social collaboration
strategy.
Team leaders interested in designing collaboration solutions.
IT professionals implementing social collaboration tools for employees.
This research is not about:Using social media for interacting
with customers. See this solution set.
Customer collaboration or interaction strategy in general.
See this solution set.
Evaluating collaboration vendors.See this solution set.
XXX
3
CollaborationGoes Social1
Map Tools to Collaboration
Patterns2
Overview of Social Tool
Vendors3
4Build a
Collaborative Culture
Executive Summary Collaboration is essential for knowledge workers. Social tools use the
friend-of-a-friend model to drive superior knowledge sharing and team productivity.
Embrace the social revolution and enable your employees with the tools they need to get their jobs done. Knowledge-based networks are here to stay. Collaboration solutions are created by understanding tools (both traditional and social) and matching them to the appropriate collaboration patterns.
There’s a broad range of collaboration tools, with a variety of enterprise use cases.
Collaboration patterns are either synchronous or asynchronous, co-located or distributed.
Social tools are now being offered by virtually all incumbent collaboration suite vendors.
The market is segmented between suite and pure-play social vendors.
However, Info-Tech predicts that consolidation will occur and the distinction between traditional and social tool will rapidly vanish.
End-user adoption is essential for realizing the value of collaboration tools. Help foster a culture that encourages the use of tools for E2E collaboration.
Bring a strong executive sponsor onboard, run a pilot project and find social collaboration evangelists in the organization.
Social collaboration is here to stay. Don’t be a barrier: enable it!
• Social collaboration uses tools based on the “friend-of-a-friend” (FoaF) model to facilitate knowledge sharing and enable team productivity. This occurs via peer-2-peer connections established between employees (as needed to do their jobs).
• Some managers are skeptical of the value of social collaboration tools, especially based upon biases concerning external social collaboration tools like Facebook or Twitter. Managers who fail to embrace social tools will be seen as barriers to effective team work.
• However, new tools that use the FoaF model within the enterprise are not a passing fad; vendors are already adding social tools to their collaboration platforms.
• Incorporating social tools into the broader collaboration strategy enables employees to be more productive and to effectively share knowledge and expertise.
Info-Tech Research Group 4
Social collaboration uses the friend-of-a-friend model.
Employees are linked to a knowledge-sharing network through peer-2-peer connections.
Enterprise Collaboration Strategy:Traditional
Collaboration Tools
Social Collaboration
ToolsA holistic collaboration strategy employs a mix of
both traditional tools and social tools.
Social collaboration leverages tools with a social dimension (i.e. friend-of-a-friend) to drive superior knowledge sharing and productivity. Social tools are a key ingredient of
a comprehensive enterprise collaboration strategy… not a substitute for one.
Info-Tech
Insight
Entry Point #1: Social tools are entering your organization through a host of enterprise applications… whether you’re ready for them or not.
• Social tools such as activity feeds and social tagging are now appearing across several different application classes – not just those designed exclusively for collaboration (i.e. SharePoint 2010).
• For example, a number of CRM vendors now provide social functionality alongside their customer interaction products. Popular SaaS CRM vendor Salesforce.com recently released a collaboration client called Chatter. In SaaS applications, you automatically get new features when you accept a new version.
• Managers must be cognizant of the social tools that are entering their organizations without formal strategy.
• In many instances, developing a strategy for social tools is less about actively acquiring the tools, and more about understanding the tools that are already entering the organization by means of existing applications.
With Chatter, I can quickly see all the things that are important to me.-Manager, Qualcomm Inc.
“
“
Info-Tech Research Group 5
Social tools are appearing everywhere: Salesforce.com’s Chatter product is an example
of a CRM vendor with a social tool offering.
Source: Salesforce.com
Social tools are permeating the organization through a variety of applications (like CRM) with or without management’s explicit approval. Savvy managers will match
tools to collaboration patterns.
Info-Tech
Insight
Entry Point #2: Have you added social tools to your strategic plan without knowing it? If you plan to adopt SharePoint 2010, you did!
• A recent survey by Info-Tech Research Group indicates that over 80% of organizations currently using SharePoint plan to upgrade to SharePoint 2010 over the next two years.
• This has very important implications for enterprise collaboration, because SharePoint 2010 includes a number of new social tools. Social functionality in SharePoint 2010 cannot be divorced from its content management features.
• The collaboration aspect of SharePoint 2010 (dubbed SharePoint Communities) integrates several new social features into SharePoint’s existing document and content management capabilities. Some notable social tools include:
– Employee profile pages– Employee activity feeds– Social tagging– Knowledge-sharing wikis
If your organization is one of the many that intends to adopt SP2010, you need to integrate
social tools into your formal enterprise collaboration strategy as part of SP2010
implementation.
Info-Tech Research Group 6
Source: Info-Tech Research Group
Whether through one of many enterprise applications (CRM, ERP, HR, ECM, BI) or through MS SharePoint, social collaboration tools will enter your organization. The question is not should you adopt these tools but how you should apply them. This
solution set will help you do just that.
BottomLine
Section 1: Collaboration Goes Social
Collaboration Goes Social
Collaboration, both synchronous and
asynchronous, is inherently a social exercise. Empower your employees with the tools they
need to maintain social connections in the form of
knowledge-sharing networks.
• Social channels can be used both internally and externally. The four overarching collaboration patterns are E2E, C2C, B2C, and B2B.
• Effective collaboration is essential for knowledge-intensive organizations where teams are the primary creators of value. Knowledge-based networks are replacing hierarchies.
• Collaboration is going social as vendors add social tools to their more traditional content management offerings. Pair traditional and social tools for maximum effectiveness.
• Social tools allow employees to connect with one another in a self-organizing manner which enables the most efficient form of knowledge-sharing for short and long-term goals.
Map Tools to Collaboration Patterns
Overview of Social Tool Vendors
41 2 3
Collaboration Goes Social
Info-Tech Research Group 7
Build a Collaborative Culture
Collaboration strategy comes in four flavors: each has a unique enterprise use case, from internal collaboration to external
marketing.
Defined:C2C = consumers interacting with one another for personal and professional purposes. C2C collaboration is uniquely a social activity.
Enterprise Use:Understanding how consumers use social networks to connect with one another is key for business use.
Consumer to Consumer
(C2C)
Business to Consumer
(B2C)
Business to Business
(B2B)
Defined:B2C = businesses using social channels to market, sell, and service directly to end consumers.
Enterprise Use:Social media is a powerful channel for consumer marketing – use social media to drive awareness and build brand equity.
Defined:B2B = businesses using social channels to market to other organizations.
Enterprise Use:Social media can be used to promote products and support sales and customer service initiatives. B2B social networks, like LinkedIn, are valuable account management tools.
Employee to Employee
(E2E)
Internal Interaction:
This solution set.
Defined:E2E = internal employees using tools for team-based collaboration.
Enterprise Use:Social tools are especially valuable for sharing knowledge and best practices, as well as enabling greater team productivity.
Info-Tech Research Group 8
External, Customer-Facing Interaction:See Info-Tech’s comprehensive solution set on
Leveraging Social Media for Customer Interaction.
75%90%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Today By mid-2011
75% of organizations surveyed have a collaboration solution deployed, with a further 15% indicating that they will deploy
one within the next 6 months.
Nearly all organizations are empowering their teams with tools for collaboration: don’t get left behind!
• Usage of collaboration platforms is growing, indicating that enterprise collaboration is here to stay.
• Collaboration platforms serve both teams and communities:
Teams are organized around common objectives. For example, a cross-functional product launch team.
Communities are organized around common interests. For example, a community of marketing professionals in the organization.
• Teams have very specific requirements, which can be mapped to the features that a collaboration solution delivers. Communities have fewer defined requirements, but allow for ongoing knowledge sharing.
• If your organization has not already deployed collaboration tools, consider how they can be used for your teams and communities.
Info-Tech Research Group 9
People are very excited to be empowered with the ability to publish content and to manage the content on their own, rather than having to go through a single point of contact.-IT Director, Healthcare Industry
“ “
Source: Info-Tech Research GroupN = 159
Enterprise collaboration is a fact-of-life for knowledge-based organizations. If you have a teamwork-intensive environment and have not already done so, now is the time to
deploy collaboration tools.
BottomLine
Distributed teams are a driving force behind new collaboration tools: ensure your teams have the
collaboration tools they need.Traditionally, team collaboration needs were met by phone, e-mail, and in-person (face-to-face)
communication. However, the need for new collaboration tools has steadily increased with the rise of distributed teams. Distributed teams include workers from multiple geographical locations,
remote employees, and “road warriors.”
Info-Tech Research Group 10
16%
16%
28%
20%
25%
27%
32%
35%
25%
42%
31%
44%
41%
46%
46%
47%
31%
22%
16%
21%
20%
21%
15%
12%
27%
21%
25%
15%
14%
6%
7%
6%
Reduce email storage
Locating internal expertise
Reduce travel costs
Reduce cycle time
Innovation
Reduce duplication of effort/content
Capture and retain knowledge
Support of distributed teams
Support of distributed teams is the most common and most achievable goal
Fully achieved Partially achieved Did not achieve Was not a goal
The majority of organizations are using collaboration platforms to support distributed
teams. Changing workforce dynamics have made collaboration platforms indispensible for
reaching this goal.
All employees in the office: collaboration platforms not
necessary.
E-mail, phone, and in-person were the ways to collaborate.
TodayTeams are more likely to
be distributed.Virtual team spaces are required.
Employees are
leveraging the strength of their peers
through a wide variety
of media.Com
mu
nic
ati
on
Work
ing
S
tyle
Yesterday Today
Communication models are rapidly changing as employees adopt new
working styles.
Source: Info-Tech Research GroupN = 168
Employee-to-employee collaboration is going social:embrace the “social revolution” to boost team
effectiveness.• Social collaboration is a natural outgrowth of
existing solutions. By definition, collaboration is an inherently social activity. Leveraging the FoaF model in an enterprise context allows for more meaningful and effective collaboration solutions.
• Collaboration platforms are undergoing a rapid transformation. The majority of vendors now offer comprehensive social collaboration tools that complement their more traditional feature sets.
• Social collaboration tools borrow from functionality seen in consumer social media: for example, employee activity feeds are a step up from syndication services like RSS and resemble popular microblogging services like Twitter.
• Despite their resemblance to consumer social media, the value proposition for enterprise social tools is distinct from their consumer counterparts.
• Focus on enabling collaboration through content management and real-time communication, through organizational hierarchies.
• Features typically include instant and e-mail messaging, file shares, Intranet sites, and Intranet search. A minority of organizations added E2E web conferencing.
• Focus on enabling collaboration through knowledge and expertise sharing via self-generated networks of connections.
• Features typically include employee profiles (with expertise searching), microblogging, and collaborative wikis, with an overlay of activity feeds generated by everything and subscribable to by anyone.
Traditional Collaboration:
Social Collaboration:
Info-Tech Research Group 11
Don’t be biased by bad experiences with external public social services, like Facebook or Twitter. Value delivery is not about the tools alone but is about the collaboration
patterns being enabled with the tools. E2E collaboration patterns are not the same as B2C, C2C, or B2B collaboration patterns!
Info-Tech
Insight
Organizational hierarchies are becoming obsolete for enabling teams to do their jobs. Leverage knowledge-based networks instead.
• Historically, organizations have relied on a hierarchical model for getting things done, using roles and the relationships between them as a template for employee interaction. Organizational relationships were rigidly structured according to specific task-based needs, with an up and down linear flow of information.
• The hierarchical model is under increasing scrutiny, especially in organizations that rely on capturing, retaining, and transforming knowledge. In order to stay competitive, knowledge-intensive firms are replacing rigid hierarchies with flexible networks.
• Knowledge-based networks rely on the friend-of-a-friend model to allow individuals and teams to locate and tap knowledge anywhere in the organization. These networks are far more effective at disseminating valuable knowledge than hierarchies.
• Social collaboration tools facilitate the formation and use of both permanent and ad hoc knowledge networks.
Info-Tech Research Group 12
• Formal• Centralized• Bureaucratic• Focus on command
and control• Well-defined,
sometimes mandated, linear flow of information
Yesterday: Hierarchies
• Informal• Distributed• Flexible• Built by employees• Focus on leveraging
knowledge and expertise
• Free flow of information
Today: Networks
Knowledge-based networks are superior to hierarchies for allowing teams to perform effectively. Social collaboration tools enable these networks by connecting employees
and teams in disparate parts of the organization.
Info-Tech
Insight
Social tools are a powerful new means for enabling employee-to-employee collaboration and team
interaction.• External social media services are extremely valuable
for interacting with external customers and stakeholders.
• By contrast, internal social tools are highly effective for enabling employee-to-employee collaboration and team interaction.
• The value proposition of social tools centers on knowledge sharing and team productivity:
– Knowledge sharing refers to the transfer of information and expertise between individuals, according to connections they establish, not forced by an organizational hierarchy. Social tools allow organizations to easily capture and retain knowledge. They also provide employees with rapid access to subject matter experts anywhere in the organization.
– Productivity is enhanced by allowing team members to quickly and accurately tap into a stream of information about what is occurring and has occurred in other projects and teams, throughout the organization, without management intervention.
Info-Tech Research Group 13
Social collaboration tools drive business value through robust knowledge sharing and
enhanced productivity.We’ve seen a real decrease in the time it takes users to connect with experts in our organization and share knowledge.-IT Manager, Professional Services Firm
“
“
The social revolution means superior knowledge sharing and better team productivity through employee-built networks, rather than being restricted by organizational
hierarchies.
Info-Tech
Insight
Pair social collaboration tools with traditional collaboration tools in order to realize the greatest business value.
Newer social tools have emerged as the “information publish and subscribe layer” in the collaboration stack. This layer used to provide only limited information available from process documentation and role-
based organizational charts, if those existed at all. Now, the employee/team information publish and subscribe layer links employees throughout the organization to one another. Traditional channels like
instant messaging facilitate the actual execution of team interaction.
Info-Tech Research Group 14
Layer 1: Employee/Team
Interaction
Low
High
Source: Info-Tech Research Group; N = 56
Traditional Tool Impact on
Enabling Social Collaboration =
76%
Social Tool Impact on Enabling
Social Collaboration =
24%
*Each bar represents a statistical estimate of the impact each tool has on enabling social collaboration
Layer 2: Employee/Team
Information Publish and Subscribe
There is no standalone “social” collaboration strategy. Rather, traditional and social collaboration tools should be used in tandem to maximize their effectiveness.
Info-Tech
Insight
There is a social collaboration tool to meetyour organization’s needs.
• There are a wide variety of collaboration tools available for use, from traditional methods like phone and e-mail to newer social methods such as microblogging and activity feeds.
• Social tools don’t alter the underlying goals of employee-to-employee collaboration. They also don’t require a complete rethink of collaboration patterns. Instead, they expand the toolbox, providing new ways for team members to interact with one another.
• Traditional tools are focused on content management and communication; social tools rely on the friend-of-a-friend model for linking employees with one another.
• The choice of collaboration tool depends largely on the collaboration patterns present in your organization. Mapping tools to collaboration patterns will be discussed more extensively in the next section.
• We’ll revisit and define specific collaboration tools in Section 2.
Info-Tech Research Group 15
Social Traditional
Social tools add new possibilities for employee-to-employee collaboration. In most cases, social tools complement rather than supplant traditional collaboration
offerings.
Info-Tech
Insight
Collaboration tools offer an abundance of business benefits and
hard cost reductions.
• In addition to the benefits of better knowledge sharing and team productivity, tools also reduce a number of “hard costs” associated with employee interaction.
• Travel and lodging costs for face-to-face interaction of remote teams can become extremely expensive. Creating virtual team spaces with the aid of collaboration tools means that firms can substantially cut down on travel and travel-related expenses. Instant messaging and web/video conferencing are highly effective collaboration methods that eliminate the need for costly in-person meetings.
• Newer collaboration tools also cut down on traditional telecommunication costs. A conversation carried out with remote team members over instant messaging is substantially less costly than a similar conversation carried out over long-distance telephone.
• While hard cost reductions provided by collaboration tools are valuable, most firms report that ongoing business benefits are more important than cost reduction. For example, a survey by Info-Tech found that respondents ranked “knowledge capture” and “innovation” higher than “reduced travel costs” as the driving force behind their collaboration strategy (refer to the chart on slide 10 for the results of this survey).
Info-Tech Research Group 16
• Social collaboration tools create business value by enhancing overall team dynamics. Specifically, they facilitate better knowledge and expertise sharing and increase team productivity.
• Knowledge and expertise sharing refers to the exchange of ideas and expertise between individuals. Social tools enable employees to both publish information valuable to others as well as subscribe to others’ information and activity feeds. Searchable employee profile pages, discussion forums, and internal wikis allow teams to readily leverage subject matter experts anywhere in the organization.
• Social tools enhance team productivity by keeping team members in the loop at all times. Activity feeds let employees keep up-to-date with what their colleagues are doing. Instant messaging and web conferencing allow for real-time communication between team members.
Our collaboration platform has resulted in consistent, up-to-date information across all team members. - IT Manager, Information Industry
Business Benefits Hard Cost Reductions
“ “
Business benefit scenarios: social tools enable knowledge sharing and boost productivity at mid-sized companies.
Info-Tech Research Group 17
A mid-sized consulting firm with global operations implements two social tools: searchable employee profiles and a knowledge sharing wiki. During a client engagement, a junior consultant uses the wiki: after researching the topic at hand, he is able to find an SME working in another country. Leveraging her knowledge as an additional resource, the project re-uses existing organizational knowledge and is completed above and beyond client expectations, leading to repeat business.
Social Tools: Better Knowledge Sharing
As a result of using social tools to successfully tap knowledge resources, the client commissioned another project from the
firm – at a profit of over $100k.
A software design company implements employee activity feeds and social tagging. The project coordinator uses the feeds to syndicate daily updates on project development. Employees who have subscribed to her feed also receive articles that have been tagged with information relevant to the project. Team members have a better idea of what is expected, in addition to receiving timely information that allows them to do their job faster. As a result, the project is completed ahead of schedule and with additional peer review.
Social Tools: Improved Productivity
Decreasing the cycle time of projects means the company is able to gain an average of one month more selling time for new products: average monthly revenue per product is
$68k.
Knowledge sharing from social tools means big gains
for business.
Social tools can lead to big productivity boosts
throughout the organization.
Cost reduction scenarios: collaboration tools cut down travel costs and reduce the amount of money spent on
telephony.
Info-Tech Research Group 18
A manufacturing design company with multiple sites brings social tools like activity feeds and wikis into the organization. As a result of the social tool roll-out, remote teams no longer need to meet face-to-face as frequently. With total travel costing $1,100 per team member per visit, and with 50 employees making an average of 4 trips a year, a 50% reduction in the need to travel saves the firm well over $100, 000 a year.
Social Tools: Reduced Travel Costs
By dramatically reducing the number of trips employees had to take to have “face-to-face brain dump sessions,” the
firm added $110k to the bottom line!
A social collaboration client that includes activity feeds and real-time instant messaging is deployed at a legal firm. As more conversations now take place over existing network infrastructure, long-distance calls between offices are reduced by 33%. With an average of 9,000 hours of long distance per year, at a cost of $0.10 a minute, the firm is poised to save close to $18, 000 a year.
Social Tools: Reduced Telecom Costs
Implementing collaboration tools that took advantage of existing infrastructure and reduced the amount of time
knowledge workers spent manning the phones saved this firm $18k a year!
Using collaboration tools reduces face-to-face
meetings, slashing line items like airfare.
Collaboration tools cut down the time your employees spend on the phone – and
the phone bill.
Section 2: Map Tools to Collaboration Patterns
Map Tools to Collaboration
Patterns
Don’t design around tools. Design solutions around common and repeatable
collaboration patterns with those collaboration tools
needed to enable teams and employees to get their jobs
done.
• The majority of organizations are employing collaboration platforms to enable E2E communication. However, mapping collaboration services to organizational roles and hierarchies is a dead-end strategy. Instead, create collaboration solutions by mapping tools to patterns.
• Designing around collaboration patterns will ensure both traditional and social collaboration tools fall into place properly.
• There are a wide variety of collaboration tools, from traditional content management tools to new social tools like employee activity feeds and microblogging.
• Collaboration patterns can be either synchronous or asynchronous, co-located or distributed.
Map Tools to Collaboration Patterns
Overview of Social Tool Vendors
41 2 3
Collaboration Goes Social
Info-Tech Research Group 19
Build a Collaborative Culture
Map collaboration tools to collaboration patterns.• Collaboration solutions are created by
matching the right tool with the appropriate pattern.
• Collaboration tools: tools are the technological means that enable employee-to-employee collaboration, both directly and around business artifacts like documents. There are a variety of tools available, both traditional and social. Think of traditional versus social merely as a way to differentiate between some tool attributes, but not as a design point.
• Collaboration patterns: patterns are recurring events and interactions that dictate the manner in which collaboration takes place. There are many patterns, but some are more common than others. Three of the most common high-level employee collaboration patterns are meetings, content creation, and content consumption. Patterns can be synchronous or asynchronous.
• Pattern matching is the process of orchestrating collaboration patterns with collaboration tools to produce a specific collaboration solution.
Info-Tech Research Group 20
The Fundamental Collaboration Equation:
The solution to enabling team collaboration is combining the right collaboration tool with the
applicable collaboration pattern.
Collaboration Pattern
Collaboration Tool
Collaboration Solution
Three Overarching Collaboration Patterns:
Employee-to-Employee collaboration typically takes place in three contexts: meetings, content
creation, and content consumption. We’ll examine each in turn.
Meetings Content Creation
Content Consumptio
n
Design collaboration solutions around common and repeatable collaboration patterns, not around tools. This will combine the right tools for the job and make the distinction of traditional versus social irrelevant. It also creates a library of solutions that business
analysts can implement for a variety of use cases.
BottomLine
Step 1: Understand the tools.
Socia
l C
ollab
ora
tion
Tools
Trad
ition
al C
olla
bora
tion
Tools
Telephone
Document Mgmt.
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conf.
Video Conf.
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Micro-
Blogging
Employee Profiles
Activity Feeds
Social Tagging/
Bookmarks
Employee Generated
Videos
Collaboration Tools
Info-Tech Research Group 21
Telephone and e-mail: the mainstays of enterprise collaboration.
Info-Tech Research Group 22
• Real-time channel that enables detection of mood through voice tone, making it a good collaboration tool for high-priority and urgent communications.
• Voice-based communications require both parties to be available simultaneously, which can create scheduling headaches. Attempting to “talk through” document edits and content creation can also be more cumbersome than other tools.
• IP telephony services are replacing traditional telephony services in the enterprise as a result of the value derived from voice and data integration.
Voice (Telephony)
• Asynchronous rich text messaging; it can also serve as a document container. The enterprise value of e-mail as a standalone collaboration tool has become so great that it is considered critical enterprise infrastructure.
• Allows knowledge workers to shift attention to non-urgent issues to off-peak periods, allowing for improved productivity.
• E-mail is a poor collaboration channel for urgent issues. The number of e-mail response cycles required to resolve an issue can easily cost more in productivity than using a real- time collaboration channel (i.e. telephone or IM).
Voice-based communications (particularly IP telephony) is highly effective for high-priority discussions. E-mail is best suited for non-critical situations where employees
can prioritize and address e-mails at their convenience.
Info-Tech
Insight
Content management and discussion forums: useful repositories.
Info-Tech Research Group 23
Content management solutions are considerably more effective than e-mail for bringing an orderly flow to document-based collaboration. Discussion forums allow
users to pose questions to their peers (and for others to see these discussions), serving as an efficient means for knowledge sharing.
Info-Tech
Insight
• Content management encompasses document repositories, library and version control, and shared workspaces.
• Content management solutions are more effective than e-mail for document-based collaboration; they impose order on what can be an otherwise chaotic process (for example, endless back-and-forth revisions are nullified by version control).
• Content management tools also archive material for all users to see, creating knowledge transparency rather than the “closed loop” of e-mail between only a few employees. This allows information to be easily repurposed for future projects.
Content Management
• Non-real-time message threads, posted in a central location.
• Extremely popular for customer service and support, as well as internal collaboration among employees (for example, frequently asked questions forums that allow employees to pose questions to their peers).
• Frequently integrate other collaboration tools, such as e-mail, text chat, voice, and presence detection.
Discussion Forums
Real-time communication tools permit on-demand collaboration.
Info-Tech Research Group 24
• Originally developed as real-time text chat with presence detection. IM clients evolved to add voice, video, file transfer, and even SMS.
• Current value to the enterprise is still from presence detection and from deflecting telephony toll charges by using quick text chats instead of long distance phone calls. However, instant messaging requires users to be present at the same time.
• A collection of real-time collaboration services including video, voice, application/document sharing, and chat.
• High enterprise value for virtual meetings, distance learning, marketing, and sales.
• Will replace the IM client as the point of aggregation for real-time collaboration services in the enterprise.
• Real-time collaboration, usually including voice, that allows people to see each other, creating a richer experience.
• Often overrated as a collaboration tool on the basis of detecting body language, especially when collaboration centers on documents and applications, not people.
• Often underrated as a field service tool for remote inspection, especially when large products cannot be shipped to a repair facility where specialists are located.
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencing
Videoconferencing
IM and web/video conferencing are indispensable for connecting teams to one another in real time.
Info-Tech
Insight
Wikis and social tagging help diffuse organizational knowledge.
Info-Tech Research Group 25
Internal wikis can be invaluable stores of knowledge for the organization. Social tagging allows users to find, categorize, and share information from a variety of
sources.
Info-Tech
Insight
• Wikis enable collaborative authoring of enterprise content, as opposed to forcing traditional editorial workflows on content authoring.
• Wikis excel at rapid maintenance of team-based enterprise content, such as service and support knowledge bases. However, the collaborative authoring model can be restricted to designated authors, rather than allowing all enterprise users to edit all content. This is a common misconception of wikis prevalent in the enterprise.
• Wikis are disrupting the traditional content management market since they often can be used as substitute products for more expensive content management and knowledge management products.
Internal Wikis
• Collaborative tagging allows users to assign keywords to content that are meaningful to them, rather than forcing them to use a predetermined taxonomy.
• Taxonomies are process-centric, while collaborative tags are user-centric. They are not mutually exclusive and can be employed to complement each other.
• Collaborative tags are usually presented and shared among users as “tag clouds,” where the most popular tags are represented in larger size text and the least popular tags are represented in small text.
• Emerging enterprise uses for tag clouds are intranet content tagging, customer and account tags in sales force automation, and user generated tags for customer service and help desk content.
Social Tagging
Employee profiles and activity feeds keep teams in the loop.
Info-Tech Research Group 26
Employee profiles are a potent method for allowing rapid access to sources of expertise anywhere in the organization. Activity feeds make it easy for team members
to track the project-based activities of those in their networks.
Info-Tech
Insight
• Employee profiles serve as a one-stop shop for relevant user-supplied information about an employee’s expertise, experience and interests.
• Typically, an employee profile consists of basic information such as education and employment background, department and current projects. It may also include a list of relevant knowledge and skills, past projects, interests and hobbies.
• Social collaboration tools provide the ability to include employee profiles when searching. This results in discovering employee expertise from a variety of inputs (as opposed to an explicit HR skills database).
• For example, a team member looking for a SME in a particular topic can run a profile search to quickly match them with an expert in the organization.
Employee Profiles
• Activity feeds syndicate a variety of information about employee and process activities to subscribers of the feed (usually team members and other interested coworkers).
• Content that appears in employee activity feeds may be deliberately generated by the user (for example, “status updates”) or may be created automatically by enterprise applications (for example, a workforce management solution announcing via an employee’s feed that he or she is on vacation).
• In keeping with the FoaF model, employees can also “follow” the feeds of their coworkers, receiving a real-time stream of the activities of their teammates.
Activity Feeds
Blogging and microblogging services rapidly push out information.
Info-Tech Research Group 27
Internal blogging services are an excellent tool for posting department and team-level updates and announcements. Internal microblogging services can rapidly disseminate
information to everyone in the organization following the microblog.
Info-Tech
Insight
• Blogs are pages where users upload content (typically written content, but sometimes images and video as well). Most blogs take the form of journal entries, where individuals or groups post information (facts, opinions, announcements).
• Internal blogs are not publicly available on the Internet. Rather, they’re used by individuals and teams in the organization to share information and keep others apprised of recent developments. Blogs can be maintained by a single individual (i.e. an employee sharing findings) or by a larger group (for example, a departmental blog).
Internal Blogging
• Microblogs bear a strong resemblance to full-scale blogs, except they are typically much shorter. While a blog entry might be several hundred words, microblogs are typically limited to a short blurb – for example, 140 characters.
• Microblogs can be used for internal collaboration as a means of quickly publishing team updates and interesting work. For example, a team might use a microblog to publish the findings of a latest study; the posting can then be seen by others in the company who are following the microblog.
Internal Microblogging
Same Place, Same Time
Different Place, Same Time
Same Place, Different Time
Different Place,Different Time
Collocated Distributed
Location
Step 2: Define your collaboration patterns.
Info-Tech Research Group 28
Synch
ronous
Tim
eA
synch
ronous
The best model to use when defining collaboration patterns is to compare the domains of time and location first. Does everyone have to be in the same place? Do activities have to take place at the same time? Choose one of four combinations as a starting point and then refine the pattern further according to specific needs, like meetings,
content creation, or content consumption.
The most basic form of collaboration: face-to-face interaction. Includes document sharing, note-taking, decision making, voting, etc.
Same Place, Same Time
Real-time communication between different locations: telephone, IM, web conferencing (video, audio, app sharing), decision making, note-taking, voting, etc.
Different Place,
Same Time
Delayed interaction that can be serial or parallel, often occurring between F2F meetings. Includes e-mail, discussion groups, content management like team spaces, wiki, blogs.
Same Place, Different
Time
Same pattern as above but no real-time. All decision-making continues in an asynchronous manner. Voting works well here too, since no real-time meetings.
Different Place,
Different Time
The Meeting Pattern: Bringing people together is critical for a smooth-functioning knowledge organization.
Info-Tech Research Group 29
• Meetings are scheduled interactions among people to achieve specific goals. They can consist of person-to-person collaboration or also involve collaborating around one or more business artifacts, such as documents, drawings, presentations, etc. Participants can be in the same location or in a different location.
• Many different meeting types can exist with an organization:
– Team Meetings– Department Meetings– Training Sessions– 1-on-1 Meetings – Client Meetings
• The key requirements of meeting patterns are:– Note taking (whiteboard, personal)– Decision making/voting– Document/application sharing– Action (follow-up) item tracking– Shared document library– Audio (unless collocated)– Video (unless collocated)– Vertical industry or compliance
requirementsWeb Conferencing Screenshot. Source: Adobe Systems, Inc.
Physical Meeting
(i.e. face-to-face)
Virtual Meeting
(mediated by technology)
There are two types of meetings:
The Publishing Pattern: Employee-generated content is king.
• One of the hallmarks of Web 2.0 is the lowering and removal of barriers to internal content creation. This enables efficient content creation by employees instead of relying on older, centralized content publishing paradigms only. Modern social collaboration tools enable employees and teams to create their own syndication feeds from what they create.
• New social technologies like blogs, micro-blogs, and wikis make it easy for employees to become internal publishers, ensuring information is fresher and more up to date.
• Employee generated video is one of the fastest growing forms of employee-generated internal content, enabled by high quality laptop cameras and microphones becoming a commodity hardware feature.
• Process-driven publishing is not dead, but process is no longer a barrier.
Info-Tech Research Group 30
Socialtext Signals is a popular microblogging application that employees
can use to quickly generate content:
Source: Socialtext
Web 2.0 technologies have socialized content by enabling employee-generated content production and publishing. This doesn’t replace process-oriented publishing, but
rather enables employees to publish less formal and fresher content updates in shorter time frames. As a result, the time-value of information is greatly increased.
Info-Tech
Insight
The Consumption Pattern: Finding knowledge and expertise is a required activity for every team.
• Finding information and expertise within the enterprise that may be useful to other employees and teams used to be painful and less than productive. This inefficient method relied on:
– Project managers remaining apprised of what each other’s projects were, with or without a formal PMO.
– Managers remaining apprised of every other activity going on in the department, trying to connect complementary efforts.
– Gurus and subject matter experts (SMEs) being exposed to the rest of the enterprise as experts in their areas via arcane HR employee profiles which were chronically in need of updating.
– Intranet search engines that got turned on and never touched afterwards, configured to be everything to everyone and ending up being useless to everyone.
• Now that common employee and team activities are exposed socially as “feeds,” the same social collaboration tools enable employees to create their own list of which feeds to regularly monitor and enable searching of feeds, documents, and employee profiles (expertise).
Info-Tech Research Group 31
Salesforce.com’s Chatter enables subscriptions to employee, document, and CRM activity with content and employee
profile search capability.
Source: Salesforce.com
Publish and subscribe, manifested as feeds and subscriptions, are the Yin and Yang of social collaboration. Their ease of use and their popularity in consumer tools, such as Facebook, have finally solved the age old knowledge management design conundrum, “How can we enable knowledge and expertise sharing if we cannot get employees to
contribute to the KM system?” Answer: Make it social, instead of a dry and academic experience.
Info-Tech
Insight
Step 3: Instrument the pattern with tools.
Info-Tech Research Group 32
Recall:The Fundamental Collaboration
Equation:
The next few slides will go through a couple of
examples of combining specific collaboration
patterns with the collaboration tools required
to support the pattern’s collaboration requirements.
These will create collaboration solutions.
Collaboration Pattern
Collaboration Tool
Collaboration Solution
Department meetings can serve as an illustrative example of creating a collaboration solution through
pattern matching.
Info-Tech Research Group 33
• Employees will be located in different places.
• Content will be shared among attendees.
• Notes, past and present, must be accessible to employees at all times.
• Department highlights are shared with other departments.
• Voice communication is required, video is not.
• Step 3A – Define the pattern.
• Generic collaboration pattern: meeting.
• Specific collaboration pattern: department meeting at a mid-sized biotechnology company.
• Explanation: the research and development department at a biotech company is having its monthly meeting. Although most employees are geographically co-located, there are two branch offices and several remote employees who also need to be kept in the loop.
• After defining the pattern, it’s important to enumerate the requirements for this meeting. Managers created the list on the right as the minimum requirements needed for the meeting.
Requirements for this meeting:
After requirements have been drafted, match the collaboration technologies to each individual requirement.
Info-Tech Research Group 34
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: The best technology to connect employees located in different
places is web conferencing. Web conferencing usually
enables application and screen sharing, white boarding, chat, and usually IP-based voice and
video.
Requirement:Employees will be located in
different places.
Step 3B: Instrument the Pattern with Technology,Requirement by Requirement
Requirements matching con’t.
Info-Tech Research Group 35
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Web conferencing is the most
effective technology for sharing content live during a meeting. Participants can view shared
workspaces and presentations in real time (without having to worry about being on the right slide, as would happen with an
e-mailed document).
Requirement:Content will be shared
among attendees.
Requirements matching con’t.
Info-Tech Research Group 36
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Uploading minutes and
documents from past meetings to a content management platform (i.e. SharePoint)
allows users rapid access to the files they need. Version control and permissions prevent users from making unauthorized or
haphazard changes.
Requirement:Notes, past and present, must be accessible to employees at
all times.
Requirements matching con’t.
Info-Tech Research Group 37
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Internal blogging and uploaded
video of the meeting allows other departments (i.e.
marketing or sales) to learn about developments that
occurred during the meeting at their leisure. Video summaries
are also popular for inter-department and project
updates. Remember, video can be a talking head but it can also be a series of slides or
images with a spoken soundtrack.
Requirement:Department highlights are
shared with other departments.
Requirements matching con’t.
Info-Tech Research Group 38
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Telephony and web-based
conferencing both satisfy the requirement for voice
communication, through PSTN and VoIP respectively.
Depending on the protocol and client, it’s possible that IM could also be used (some
instant messaging services also support voice and even video).
Requirement:Voice communication is required, video is not.
Step 3C: Put it all together to create the solution.
Info-Tech Research Group 39
Department Meeting Pattern (fairly traditional, not uniquely social)
• Employees will be located in different places.
• Content will be shared among attendees.
• Notes, past and present, must be accessible to employees at all times.
• Department highlights are shared with other departments.
• Voice communication is required, video is not.
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Collaboration Solution for Department Meetings
Summary: Map tools to collaboration patterns.
Info-Tech Research Group 40
Recommendations:• IT business analysts should create a
library of the most common collaboration patterns in their organization and inventory collaboration tools.
• If a gap exists between pattern requirements and tools, procurement may be required. See Info-Tech’s solution set, Select the Right Collaboration Platform.• Don’t forget about the new
features and tools your organization will be gaining automatically if SharePoint 2010 is on your roadmap!
• Use collaboration pattern matching, on an ongoing basis, to design solutions to satisfy business unit requests. Pattern matching is an especially useful methodology for IT groups responsible for managing collaboration platforms on a permanent basis, such as MS SharePoint. You can’t just turn end users loose on SharePoint. SharePoint sites require solutions design just like any other collaborative applications.
Collaboration Pattern
Collaboration Tool
Collaboration Solution
See Appendix A for an additional collaboration pattern matching
exercise, combining both traditional and social collaboration
tools into a single collaboration solution.
Section 3: Overview of Social Tool Vendors
Overview of Social Tool Vendors
Powerful social tool sets are now being offered by the majority of vendors, both pure-play collaboration
vendors and integrated with enterprise applications (CRM, ERP, ECM, BI). Awareness of
vendor capabilities and social product roadmaps has
become as important as new product selection.
• Enterprise collaboration vendors are continuing to add social collaboration tools to their platforms; this trend is virtually universal. The market can be segmented into suite and pure-play social vendors.
• The enterprise social collaboration market is now mature with Microsoft consolidating its social collaboration strategy in SharePoint 2010. A majority of organizations will have deployed social collaboration tools to employees by the end of 2011.
• Enterprise application vendors (CRM, ERP, ECM, BI, etc.) are also adding social collaboration services to their platforms, to support the four major categories of collaboration patterns (B2B, B2C, C2C, E2E) as needed.
Map Tools to Collaboration Patterns
Overview of Social Tool Vendors
41 2 3
Collaboration Goes Social
Info-Tech Research Group 41
Build a Collaborative Culture
The collaboration market is split between suite and pure-play vendors.
Collaboration Suite Vendors:
Collaboration suite vendors offer comprehensive collaboration platforms that include both
traditional features (i.e. content management) and social tools.
Pure-Play Social Vendors:
Pure play social vendors provide tools that center predominantly
on the social aspects of collaboration (i.e. activity feeds,
microblogging, etc.) Social Workplace
Pulse
Lotus Connections
At this time, the market is split. Within 3 to 5 years, social tools will be subsumed with generic collaboration platforms. Pure-plays will diminish.
Info-Tech
Prediction
Info-Tech Research Group 42
Vendor Overview
Info-Tech Research Group 43
Vendor/Product Highlighted Features
Microsoft SharePoint 2010 • Employee profiles, microblogging, and activity feeds. Real-time collaboration capabilities via integration with Microsoft Lync. Content management and library services standard.
Jive • Collaboration suite that often competes with SharePoint.• Profiles, blogs, wikis, feeds, etc.
Drupal • More collaboration platform than suite. • Profiles, blogs, wikis, feeds, etc.
Lotus Quickr • Collaboration suite focused on team spaces.
Socialtext • Enterprise microblogging (Socialtext Signals), wikis.• Searchable profiles and activity feeds. • Integration with enterprise applications such as SharePoint.
Salesforce.com Chatter • Profiles, groups, feeds, real-time chat. • Integration with Salesforce. com CRM.• Analytics and dashboards.• Licensed users can extend invites to customers for free, enabling E2E,
B2B, and B2C collaboration with a single product.
OpenText Social Workplace • Profiles, blogs, wikis, feeds, etc.• Compelling user interface based on many familiar smartphone
metaphors.
Lotus Connections • Focus on social software rather than traditional functionality.• Includes profiles, blogs, wikis, feeds, etc.
Elgg • Open source social networking engine, focused on activity stream plug-ins.
NewsGator • Suite of social tools, heavily integrated with Microsoft SharePoint.
Cisco Pulse • Explicit focus on serving as a tool for rapidly locating expertise within the organization.
Info-Tech Research Group 44
• Now there are many competitors in this market, fueled by the rise of Web 2.0 collaboration paradigms.
• The defining difference between new vendors and established ones is the starting point. Established vendors built their platforms from a content management perspective; new vendors have built theirs with collaboration as the priority.
• Established vendors have recently bridged the collaboration and content management gap, making it increasingly difficult for organizations to buy the right product.
• To complicate the selection process further, many niche vendors have SharePoint connectors that deliver more advanced collaboration features so that organizations can continue to leverage their current SharePoint environment for content management.
• For more information on vendor selection, see Info-Tech’s solution set, Select the Right Collaboration Platform.
SharePoint continues to dominate – though there are a variety of other collaboration platforms available.
N=159
Just a few years ago, selection of a standard collaboration platform was easy: Microsoft or IBM. Microsoft continues to maintain
the vast market share, holding a comfortable 71% of surveyed
organizations using a collaboration solution.
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
(MOSS)45%
Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services
(WSS)26%
IBM Lotus Quickr6%
Open Text3%
Drupal2%
Jive1%
EMC1%
Other16%
Microsoft continues to maintain a vast amount of the market share – holding a comfortable 71% share of the organizations Info-Tech
recently surveyed who were using a collaboration solution.
N=159
Microsoft’s dominant market share in the collaboration arena, coupled with the social features in SP2010, means that
social tools are poised for an enterprise breakaway.
Collaboration heavyweight SharePoint 2010 introduces a multitude of new social collaboration features.
Info-Tech Research Group 45
Microsoft SharePoint remains the dominant collaboration platform. Alongside its traditional content management capabilities, SharePoint 2010 includes a number of
robust social features. Its widespread adoption will be a sweeping victory in the social revolution.
SharePoint Communities is the social feature toolset of SharePoint
2010.
Employee Activity Feed
Employee Profile Page
Microblog status update
Source: Microsoft
Microsoft Lync complements SharePoint’s social features with tools for real-time enterprise communication.
Info-Tech Research Group 46
Microsoft Lync has officially replaced Office Communications Server as Microsoft’s real-time communication client. Updated features beyond typical instant messaging and presence support include live employee profile searches and integration with
SP2010 social features.
Lync integrates with SharePoint 2010 to bring presence notifications
directly to employee profile pages in SP.
Global search finds not just names, but also mines employee profiles for relevant skills and experience, then allows an instant connection to the
individual.
Source: Microsoft
Vendors will continue to add social tool capabilities. The distinction between social & traditional collaboration will vanish
asthe market converges..
• For now, organizations will be confronted with a choice between collaboration suites or pure-play social vendors. However, Info-Tech predicts that the market will rapidly converge.
• The outlook over the next five years will see traditional and social tools merge almost seamlessly. The distinction between traditional and social collaboration will become blurred at the product level but will become different types of platform services.
• Social tools will also proliferate inside the enterprise from a variety of different vendors, as CRM and ERP vendors offer collaboration functionality alongside their core product offerings.
• The upcoming market convergence doesn’t mean organizations should hold off on adoption of social tools. It means that managers should be aware of vendor viability: all things being equal, vendors that have both traditional and social offerings will likely possess more long-term viability. Many pure-play social vendors will live on through acquisition by traditional vendors.
Info-Tech Research Group 47
As social collaboration tools become more commonplace and are integrated further with content management and communication technologies, vendors will no longer make a distinction between “old” and “new,” “traditional” and “social” collaboration
platforms.
Info-Tech
Insight
Traditional Tools
Social Tools
Market Convergence
Enterprise Collaboration: 5-Year Outlook
Section 4: Build a Collaborative Culture
Build a Collaborative Culture
Bring executives and end users on board to build a
culture that supports collaboration excellence.
• End-user adoption of collaboration solutions is essential for realizing a return on investment from social tools. Many organizations are not seeing adequate tool adoption.
• Mid-to-large organizations are poised to see the greatest benefits from adoption of social collaboration tools.
• Don’t let your perceptions on external social media negatively bias your stance on enterprise tools.
• Bring senior management onboard to help drive home the message that collaboration is a necessity. Manage the “value perception gap” between managers and employees.
• Go forward with a proof-of-concept roll-out to prove business value and to build buzz around full-scale deployment.
Map Tools to Collaboration Patterns
Overview of Social Tool Vendors
41 2 3
Collaboration Goes Social
Info-Tech Research Group 48
Build a Collaborative Culture
Not seeing uptake of tools in your organization?Build a collaborative culture that will drive end-user
adoption.• Many organizations are not seeing high usage of
existing collaboration tools. It’s dangerous to assume that just because tools are deployed, they’ll automatically be used by end users.
• A tool that sits on the shelf is of no business value. Like most other technology-based solutions, end users need to put collaboration tools to use in order for the organization to see a positive ROI.
• Organizations that did see higher usage were putting strategic intent behind their solutions and were more likely to deploy the solutions for teams, rather than communities.
• Help create a collaborative culture at your organization that will enable effective collaboration tool use.
• To draft a collaboration business plan, use Info-Tech’s Social Collaboration Business Plan Template.
Info-Tech Research Group 49
High Usage6%
Moderate Usage48%
Minimal Usage44%
No Usage2%
Only 6% of organizations are reporting high usage with their collaboration solutions
Our issue isn’t the application itself, but rather that we aren’t getting the usage. We put it in and hoped that it would grow organically – but that didn’t happen. - IT VP, Manufacturing
“
”Adoption of collaboration solutions by end users is essential for realizing business
value. Conducting a readiness assessment and drafting a collaboration business plan are the first steps in building a collaborative culture.
Info-Tech
Insight
N = 168
Use Info-Tech’s Readiness Assessment & Social Collaboration Business Plan to kick-start your initiatives.
Info-Tech Research Group 50
Readiness Tool Collaboration Business Plan
This readiness assessment tool provides IT managers with an objective assessment of
the current state of their organization's collaboration environment and offers recommendations for improvement.
Documenting your social collaboration and E2E interaction strategy into a business plan
is a crucial step in planning a social tool implementation. This template builds on the results from the social collaboration maturity
and readiness assessment tool to help you build a living social collaboration business
plan for the enterprise.
Small enterprises beware! Medium to large organizations can be more effective at social collaboration.
Eff
ecti
ven
ess
High
Low
N = 124; Source: Info-Tech Research Group
Social Tools
Larger organizations tend to be more distributed and have a larger number of employees and ongoing projects at any given time. These factors alone present far greater barriers to maintaining
awareness of other employees’ and teams’ activities, which presents a perfect fit for social collaboration tools.
• The larger the organization, the more immediate the benefits will be from all collaboration technologies.
• Small organizations need to choose their collaboration goals carefully. If everyone already knows everyone else and activity updates can be performed by essentially yelling over the cubicle, then investments in collaboration technology may not produce the expected benefits.
• Don’t buy into every vendor claim of benefits if you’re a co-located, small organization.
Info-Tech Research Group 51
*Note: Small organizations were defined as organizations with fewer than 25 IT employees. Medium organizations were defined as organizations with 26 to 250 IT employees. Large/enterprise organizations were defined as organizations with greater than 250 IT employees.
*Note: Only the tools that were found to be statistically significant are included in the graph
In a smaller organization like ours, we don’t really realize a lot of value from some of the tools when we can collaborate face-to-face. But I can see how [social tools] would be of tremendous benefit to a larger company. - IT Manager, Religious Organization
“
”
Info-Tech Research Group 52
• Most IT managers know they need collaboration (or already have a tool like SharePoint), but they are not really sure what they are going to use it for.
• Determine where collaboration will create value and how it will occur prior to selecting the technology.
• Collect specific requirements and document the collaboration strategy/business plan.
Planning steps matter.
• Evaluating integration requirements against vendor capabilities is a critical planning step as it will impact overall usage.
• RFPs ensure the right product is being evaluated for specific needs.
• Vendor demos allow you to evaluate the look and feel of the products, while also forcing the vendors to prove that their tool can do what is says it can do.
Vendor selection process matters.
Organizations in the top quartile for achievement of collaboration goals took 30% more planning & selection steps than those in the
bottom.
Important Planning Steps
•Gather user requirements•Solicit business requirements•Create a written collaboration strategy/business plan
Important Vendor Selection Steps
•Evaluate integration requirements•Conduct RFPs•Have vendors demo their products
Expect to spend 50% of the total implementation work effort on the planning and vendor selection phase.
Info-Tech
Insight
Don’t let lack of experience with consumer social media negatively impact your use of social tools for employee-to-employee
collaboration.• Organizations vary significantly with respect to
their use of external social media for customer and stakeholder interaction.
• Some organizations are enthusiastic users of social media for sales, marketing and customer service, while others are skeptical of the benefits of adding a new channel to their customer interaction strategy.
• Regardless of your organization’s experiences with consumer social media, it’s important to realize that enterprise social tools have a value proposition that’s distinct from consumer social media.
• Many organizations prohibit employee usage of social media in the workplace. However, enterprise social tools are not for “personal” use; they facilitate team-based objectives.
Info-Tech Research Group 53
Info-Tech’s research indicates that organizations that used social media for external customer interaction were actually more likely to report that internal collaboration tools were effective, demonstrating
that there is a correlation between success with external and success with internal social collaboration
tools.
Ove
rall
Effec
tive
ness
of S
ocia
l Too
lsD
iscu
ssio
n Fo
rum
sEm
ploy
ee-
Gen
erat
ed
Vid
eos
Rea
l-Tim
e Vid
eo
Con
fere
ncin
g Web
Con
fere
ncin g
N = 124; Source: Info-Tech Research
Group
Social Tools
Eff
ecti
ven
ess
High
Low
14%
20%
14%
12%
10%
Some managers may be skeptical of enterprise social tools due to their superficial resemblance to consumer social media. However, social tools are inward-facing and designed to strengthen team-based collaboration. The enterprise use case is unique.
Info-Tech
Insight
Senior management sets the tone for enterprise collaboration.
Encourage them to send the right messages.• If teamwork is the engine of your production,
then reward it and discourage people from insisting on working alone. Cite the company’s investment in collaboration technology as proof of its commitment to teamwork.
• Let employees know that a certain amount of personal dialog using company social tools is OK. After all, valuable employee connections are just as often made based upon personal activities outside of work as they are based on joint interests in work projects. As long as standards of conduct are met, there should not be a problem.
• Senior management needs to use social technologies themselves and let employees know that they understand the difference between enterprise social collaboration and personal social collaboration (e. g. Facebook).
Info-Tech Research Group 54
So it really can hinge on whether or not the executives openly support this or not. I think that gaining that initial buy-in and support is essential.-IT Manager, Not-For-Profit
“ “
Senior management needs to show commitment to collaboration solutions. Find an executive
sponsor in the business who can help lead the way.
Info-Tech’s research actually shows that employees think management understands social collaboration better than management thinks it understands social collaboration. Learn to use the tools as management and earn your employees’ trust implied by this
“value perception gap”.
Info-Tech
Insight
The Value Perception Gap: Employees perceive higher interest than management in social collaboration tools.
IT planners need to be aware of and address any gap in value perception among IT and Business management. Otherwise, this gap will present a barrier to adoption of social collaboration tools
within the enterprise. Help managers understand the value that social tools deliver and that they are already entering the organization through upgrades to existing collaboration platforms,
especially SharePoint, and through a multitude of other enterprise apps, like CRM. It’s better to tame the beast than ignore it as it breaks down your door.
Leve
l of
Inte
rest
High
Low
Shown Interest in Using Social Collaboration Tools
*Note: The overall interest in using social collaboration tools was calculated by taking the average of the interest shown by employees and management
Employees consisted of team members, leads and supervisorsManagement consisted of managers and directors
N = 73; Source: Info-Tech Research Group
Employees perceived that both management and themselves had the same amount of interest in social collaboration tools
Management on the other hand perceived much lower interest in social collaboration tools than employees for both employees and themselves (management).
Overall, there was a 35% difference in employee and management perceptions
There was a 27% difference in employee and management perceptions of employee interest
There was a 42% difference in employee and management perceptions of management interest
Info-Tech Research Group 55
Value Perception Gap
Don’t design proof-of-concept projects around younger projects simply because they have a greater affinity for social collaboration.
• Implementing social tools will be easier with younger employees. Adoption of external social media is highest by the “Generation Y”. These users are generally the most familiar and comfortable with the kinds of functionality offered by social collaboration tools.
• Younger, mobile staff can be successfully leveraged as evangelists for social tools, but they aren’t always good at articulating the value in business terminology. Embrace their willingness to adopt social tools and help them talk about it in business terms.
• However, success with social collaboration requires that a critical mass of social content is published before value is perceived in the act of consuming the information through social connections. Choose proof-of-concept projects (POC) based upon the potential for rapid employee-generated content, not age group. For example, shorter term project cycles generate the most information in the shortest amount of time and these project teams make good early adopters of social tools. On the other hand, projects that won’t be completed for one or two years make horrible POCs for social tools.
Info-Tech Research Group 56
We work mostly with older nurses that are not very well versed in technology as a whole. With that being said, however, those that are using it are very happy with it. They see great value in the ability to meet and discuss virtually without
the need to necessarily attend conferences or host onsite meetings and so forth.
-IT Manager, Medical Devices Industry
“ “
Young employees do embrace social collaboration as just business-as-usual. They even make employment decisions based upon how advanced a company’s social strategy is. But they are not the employees you need to “prove” the concept to in projects designed to be proofs of concept. To be successful, balance your inclusion of younger employees in POCs with those employees and teams expected to produce the most useful social
content in the shortest amount of time.
Info-Tech
Insight
Time
Conte
nt
POC project duration must be balanced withreaching a critical mass of socially-generated content.
High
High
Low
Low
Social CollaborationPOC
Sweet Spot
Too long fora useful POC
Too long fora useful POC
Not enough content to test social sharing
Case Study (Slide 1/2): Collaborative tools drive world-class business performance at FONA International.
Firm: FONA InternationalIndustry: Applied Food Science
Social Collaboration Solution: SocialtextApprox. Cost of Solution: $20 000
We were attracted to Socialtext because it offered a lot of the social tools we were looking for, but it didn’t require the same kind of infrastructure upgrades and additional staff that a larger-scale platform like SharePoint would’ve required.-Steve on Vendor Selection
“
“
• FONA International creates and manufactures flavors for many of the largest food, beverage, nutraceutical and pharmaceutical companies in the world.
• As a knowledge-intensive organization, senior management and IT recognized the benefits of increasing knowledge sharing and productivity through social tools.
• In 2008, the organization rolled out a pilot project using a mix of traditional and social tools (content management paired with employee wikis). The project was a resounding success.
• In 2009, FONA selected Socialtext for its full-scale social collaboration platform roll-out. Socialtext was selected on the basis of its strong social toolset and minimal infrastructure investment requirements.
• In mid-2009, Socialtext was distributed throughout the organization. In order to increase adoption, end users who would serve as effective evangelists for social tools were identified and given additional training and resources.
We were able to get the backing of senior management for the pilot with 37 Signal’s Base Camp product. After that went smoothly, we started looking at solutions for a full-scale rollout of social tools to the rest of the company.-Steve Brewer, IT Director, FONA Int’l
“ “
Info-Tech Research Group 57
Case Study (Slide 2/2): FONA International Con’t.
One mistake that a lot of organizations make is creating walled gardens within their collaboration solutions. Team pages, wikis, and content management sites need to be as open and transparent as possible – they shouldn’t reflect organizational and departmental boundaries. Anyone should be able to access shared knowledge.-Steve on common mistakes
“
“
• After the roll out, social tools took off – tools that have been particularly popular (and effective) for increasing collaboration are internal wikis and Socialtext Signals (an employee activity feed/microblogging service).
• Many teams that embraced collaborative tools are considered the highest performing.
• In order to realize value from tools, they were mapped to collaboration patterns and embedded in the organization’s workflows.
• Social tools helped create value at FONA by capturing knowledge “in the flow” (while getting work done) – i.e. by retaining knowledge generated by employee workflows, rather than “above of the flow” (intentional extra work) - which requires employees to set aside time to catalog their knowledge and activities.
Decreased time in connecting subject-matter experts to one another.
Increased capture, retention and dissemination of knowledge.
Decreased project management and collaboration costs by centralizing team pages (rather than flurries of e-mails calls).
Some business benefits identified at FONA:
Use a proof-of-concept project with executive support to prove the value of social tools to the organization. Leverage power users to serve as evangelists for social tools. A large part of the underlying value of social tools comes from their ability to capture
knowledge in a way that fits naturally with team workflows – updating blogs , wikis or activity feeds feels more natural than “out of the flow” work such as writing formal
Q&A manuals or knowledge guides.
Info-Tech
Insight
Info-Tech Research Group 58
59
Conclusion
Employees are adopting social tools for effectively interacting with others in their personal lives at an astounding rate.
Tools that enable the same type of peer to peer network building among employees are enterprise-ready, but most enterprise collaboration strategies are not ready.
Vendors of collaboration platforms and enterprise applications (CRM, RP, etc.) are rapidly adding social collaboration tools to their products.
The majority of Info-Tech’s clients plan to upgrade to MS SharePoint 2010 within two years. MS SharePoint 2010 is tightly integrated around social tools and will force companies into social collaboration, whether they are ready or not.
Organizational hierarchies are valuable for resource management but are not sufficient as a framework for employee-to-employee (E2E) interaction.
Enabling employees and teams to form direct (peer) connections to other employees and teams, based upon knowledge and expertise shortens cycle times, improves knowledge reuse and builds long-lasting relationships between employees across organizational boundaries.
Social collaboration tools, used in conjunction with traditional collaboration tools, enable employees to share (syndicate) their expertise and activities and enable them to follow (subscribe to) the activities of other employees whose work activities are complimentary.
Understand what value social collaboration tools add to traditional collaboration in order to build or update the organization’s collaboration strategy.
Design collaboration strategy around common and repeatable employee collaboration patterns, not tools, to produce collaboration solutions that effectively blend social and traditional collaboration.
Review the current collaboration product market segmentation to make sound upgrade and/or procurement decisions from among the options of collaboration platform vendors, especially MS SharePoint 2010; pure-play social collaboration vendors; and enterprise application vendors (CRM, ERP, etc.).
Encourage a culture of collaboration across the organization to effectively implement collaboration solutions that include social collaboration.
Info-Tech Research Group
60
Related Research
1. Select the Right Collaboration Platform
2. Leverage Social Media for Enhanced Customer Interaction
3. Evaluate SharePoint for Enterprise Content Management
4. New SharePoint 2010: Now One Stop for Collaboration and Content
5. Collaboration Strategy At-a-Glance
Info-Tech Research Group
Need Additional Support?Info-Tech goes beyond research: Speak directly to an analyst and/or engage on-site
consulting services to help your team achieve results.Trigger Point: Understanding Social Media & Collaboration
Understanding the Impact of Social Media on Internal and
External Collaboration
Reviewing Existing Collaboration Business Processes
Our Advisory & Consulting Services
Establishment of a common understanding of the impact of social
media on internal and external collaboration across the organization
Review of the existing business processes; identification of areas that
can benefit from investment in internal and external collaboration
tools
Trigger Point: Developing a Strategy for Social Media & Collaboration
Reviewing Existing Collaboration Technologies
Defining Functional and Technology Requirements
Our Advisory & Consulting Services
Assessment of the existing information architecture, with
emphasis on collaboration technologies
Definition of functional (business/end user) and technology requirements
Trigger Point: Comparing Collaboration Vendor Offerings
Reviewing the Vendor Landscape for Collaboration Tools
Developing the Business Case, Selecting and Procuring the
Collaboration Solution
Our Advisory & Consulting Services
Preliminary vendor short-listing of targeted solutions based on established functional and technology requirements
Business case development, Request for Proposal (RFP) development and
vendor response evaluation
Email our Advisory Team to find out how we have helped other clients and get your Collaboration initiative started today!
Appendix A: Collaboration Pattern Matching Exercise 2:Team Interaction
Teams can serve as an illustrative example of creating a collaboration solution through pattern matching.
Info-Tech Research Group 63
• Step 3A – Define the pattern.
• Generic collaboration pattern: team content generation.
• Specific collaboration pattern: team content generation on a custom consulting project.
• Explanation: a large consulting firm with a high percentage of distributed workers must complete a number of deliverables for an important client.
• After defining the pattern, it’s important to enumerate the requirements for team workflows. Managers created the list on the right as the minimum requirements needed for ongoing team interaction and content creation.
Requirements for this meeting:• Team members will be located in
different places.
• All content, especially project research, must be available to all team members at all times and library services (version control, check-in check-out) are required.
• Similar previous projects and subject matter experts must be located.
• Project highlights are shared with other projects.
• Video communication is required.
• Document sharing and white boarding (i.e. brainstorming) is required during team meetings.
• A record of decisions made is required, especially if made asynchronously in email.
• Project Team member online status and ability to chat required.
• Team members required to keep abreast of other team member activities.
After requirements have been drafted, match the collaboration technologies to each individual requirement.
Info-Tech Research Group 64
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Telephone, e-mail and instant
messaging can quickly connect disparate team members with one another. Telephone and IM
are best for urgent matters, while e-mail can be used for
non-urgent interaction.
Requirement:Employees will be located in
different places.
Requirements matching con’t.
Info-Tech Research Group 65
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Content management platforms allow teams to create effective
document workflows.
Requirement:All content, especially project research, must be available to all team members at all times and library services (version control, check-in, check-out)
are required.
Requirements matching con’t.
Info-Tech Research Group 66
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Searchable profiles and activity
feeds allow employees to quickly track-down sources of
expertise anywhere in the organization.
Requirement:Similar previous projects and
subject matter experts must be located.
Requirements matching con’t.
Info-Tech Research Group 67
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Blogs can be used to allow
other projects and departments to find out what’s going on with
another team or division.
Requirement:Project highlights are shared
with other projects.
Requirements matching con’t.
Info-Tech Research Group 68
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Video communication is enabled by various video
conferencing solutions, ranging from a built-in laptop Webcam
to full-scale telepresence.
Requirement:Video communication is
required.
Requirements matching con’t.
Info-Tech Research Group 69
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Web conferencing creates
virtual team spaces, complete with live white boarding
capabilities.
Requirement:Document sharing and white boarding (brainstorming) is
required during team meetings.
Requirements matching con’t.
Info-Tech Research Group 70
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Internal wikis are highly effective for storing and
recording decision points. Discussion forums are still
useful for this purpose, but are not as efficient as the team-
authoring capabilities afforded by wikis.
Requirement:A record of decisions made is required, especially if made
asynchronously in email.
Requirements matching con’t.
Info-Tech Research Group 71
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Instant messaging offers
presence detection as well as rich text, multimedia and file sharing capabilities that meet
online chat requirements.
Requirement:Project Team member online
status and ability to chat required.
Requirements matching con’t.
Info-Tech Research Group 72
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
Videos
Telephone
Content Management
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Rationale: Employee activity feeds are
indispensible for allowing team members to see the “in the
flow” activities of their peers.
Requirement:Team members required to keep abreast of other team
member activities.
Telephone
Content Manageme
nt
Discussion Forums
Instant Messaging
Web Conferencin
g
Video Conferencin
g
Put it all together.
Info-Tech Research Group 73
Project Team Pattern (both traditional and social)
• Team members will be located in different places.
• All content, especially project research, must be available to all team members at all times and library services (version control, check-in check-out) are required.
• Similar previous projects and subject matter experts must be located.
• Project highlights are shared with other projects.
• Video communication is required.
• Document sharing and white boarding (brainstorming) is required during team meetings.
• A record of decisions made is required, especially if made asynchronously in email.
• Project Team member online status and ability to chat required.
• Team members required to keep abreast of other team member activities.
Wikis
Internal Blogging
Internal Microbloggi
ng
Employee Profiles
Employee Activity Feeds
Social Tagging
Employee-Generated
VideosCollaboration Solution for Project Teams
Appendix B: Collaboration Defined
Effective collaboration is a necessity for knowledge workers: enabling employee-to-employee collaboration is
critical.
• Collaboration refers to an ongoing process where two or more individuals work together to achieve mutually shared goals.
• Employees must be able to collaborate with one another in order to brainstorm, share ideas and complete projects.
• Collaboration occurs in virtually every organization and industry, but it is particularly important in knowledge-driven organizations where the majority of the value is generated by cross-functional teams.
• Knowledge workers must have an effective medium through which to share their insights with internal (and external) stakeholders. A breakdown in collaboration can have disastrous consequences.
Info-Tech Research Group 75
Sr.Mgmt.
Knowledge Workers
Process Workers
Improving collaboration amongst knowledge
workers (i.e. IT, finance, marketing) is essential for
having high-performing teams.
Teams generate the majority of the value in knowledge-driven organizations. Increasing team productivity and knowledge sharing through superior collaboration
increases the overall output and competitiveness of the organization.
BottomLine
Superior collaboration means more effective employees.
• The value proposition of collaboration platforms is all about enabling teams to be more effective and efficient.
• The design point for any collaboration solution should be based on enabling team productivity and knowledge-sharing.
• Collaboration gains mean business gains: knowledge-based organizations can benefit tremendously from improved team dynamics brought about by superior collaboration.
• The necessity of effective collaboration is often highlighted by what happens when it doesn’t work: most managers have experienced firsthand the frustration that ensues when “communication breakdowns” prevent teams from being able to complete projects on time or to specification.
Info-Tech Research Group 76
We need to put information in a central place where it can be accessed for generations.-Director, Consulting Firm
“
“ Team members
communicate frequently and productively with one another.
Team members can quickly locate sources of knowledge and expertise within the team and the broader organization.
Team members rarely connect with one another: there is little coordination within the team.
Lack of communication means each team member has no idea what their teammates are doing.
Project goals are ill-defined.
Strong Team Collaboration:
Weak Team Collaboration:
Ineffective and cumbersome collaboration drains team productive; in extreme cases, it can cause the downfall of entire projects. Organizations that find ways to improve
employee-to-employee collaboration realize superior team dynamics.
BottomLine
Appendix C: An Overview of External Social Interaction Channels
Consumer-to-Consumer (C2C): Social media is rapidly becoming the dominant communication medium for many
consumers.• Consumer adoption of social media is moving
at a breakneck speed. According to Web ranking service Alexa.com, Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter all place in the Top 10 most visited Websites (on a global basis!).
• Consumers use social networks to keep in touch with their personal and professional networks. Social networking services like Facebook are geared predominantly for interaction with friends and family, while sites like LinkedIn are oriented towards keeping up-to-date with professional contacts.
• While social media was initially popular with a younger audience, there is now a strong adoption trend among consumers of all ages and demographic backgrounds.
• Consumers have shown a keen willingness to discuss brands and products over social media. It’s “word of mouth” on steroids.
Info-Tech Research Group 78
Related ResearchSee Info-Tech’s solution set, Leverage Social Media for Enhanced Customer Interaction to gain a better
understanding of how social media is being used by consumers to interact with their personal and professional networks.
*Source: Nielson Online
Business-to-Consumer (B2C): Social media is an indispensible channel for building brands that resonate
with consumers.• Businesses must go where their customers
go. Consumers are flocking to social media, so organizations that subscribe to the B2C model are flocking with them.
• Despite the hype, social media does not require a radical overhaul of your customer interaction strategy. It’s simply a new channel that can be leveraged (along with traditional channels) for marketing, sales, and service.
• A survey conducted by Info-Tech found that building positive brand image and increasing mindshare were the two social media objectives that managers reported were most successful.
• Consumer conversations taking place in the cloud can influence brands for good or ill. Have a strategy in place to monitor and respond to customer conversations about your brand.
Info-Tech Research Group 79
Related ResearchSee Info-Tech’s solution set, Leverage Social Media for Enhanced Customer Interaction for best practices
and case studies on successfully using social media for customer relationship management in a B2C environment.
Social media is a new channel that taps directly into the “customer cloud”, providing unrivalled
exposure for marketing and sales purposes.
Business-to-Business (B2B): Organizations are effectively using social media for B2B sales, marketing
and support.• While building brand equity using social
media can be more difficult for organizations engaged in B2B rather than B2C selling, maintaining a presence on social networking services is still extremely cost effective. Building a business profile page on Facebook requires no monetary investment beyond the time it takes staff to set up the page.
• Some B2B enterprises are using LinkedIn to conduct customer prospecting. Promising leads can be easily researched on LinkedIn prior to cold calling or other direct selling initiatives.
• Organizations that sell B2B are also employing microblogging services like Twitter to keep their clients apprised of new product developments and service updates.
Info-Tech Research Group 80
Related ResearchSee Info-Tech’s solution set, Leverage Social Media for Enhanced Customer Interaction to gain a better
understanding of how social media is being used by consumers to interact with their personal and professional networks.
Increased Revenue: Social media is an additional channel for organizations to provide product and service information to prospective clients. A higher conversion ratio translates into more revenue.
Customer Acquisition: Social media can be exploited for lead generation, particularly by leveraging the FOAF model in B2B scenarios. Many CRM Vendors are linking platforms like LinkedIn and Facebook to sales automation software to enable sales to leverage referrals through their business and personal networks.
Customer Insights: Organizational buying behaviors and patterns can be gathered by monitoring social media sites and then used to design sales delivery models.
1
2
3
Top 3 Opportunities for B2B:
Social Media Services
CRM Suites withSocial Media
Social Channel Aggregators
Info-Tech Research Group 81
CRM vendors are rapidly adding social tools to their suites, mostly for enhanced customer interactions across marketing, sales and service.
However, Salesforce.com is now focusing its “Chatter” social tool on B2C, B2B and E2E collaboration patterns. Chatter enables social collaboration between the organization and its customers as well as exclusively among employees, such as collaboration among the sales force.
As a result, as with all things IT, purchasing social collaboration tools from a single vendor may not be possible, to satisfy every collaboration pattern in the organization.
For more about Social CRM, see the Info-Tech Solution Set, Leverage Social Media for Enhanced Customer Interaction.
Social CRM Vendor
Landscape:
Social CRM Vendors: not true collaboration vendors - but adding tools fast.
Appendix D: Social Collaboration Survey Results
Appendix E: Survey Results – Respondent Demographics