Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0%...

53
February 11, 2015 Governor Rick Snyder, CPA Lt. Governor Brian Calley Budget Director John Roberts Michigan Growing Stronger

Transcript of Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0%...

Page 1: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

February 11, 2015Governor Rick Snyder, CPALt. Governor Brian Calley

Budget Director John Roberts

MichiganGrowing Stronger

Page 2: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Michigan Economy Coming Back Strong• More than 300,000 new private sector jobs since December 2010• Unemployment lowest since 2002; lowest unemployed since 2001• Home sales and values on the rise

2

Page 3: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Creating More and Better Jobs

3

Change in Michigan Wage and Salary Employment from Previous Year (thousands of jobs)

Note: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  2014‐2017 estimates are 1/16/15 Consensus Forecast.  1/20/15.     

Avg.

Consensus Forecast

‐112.7‐76.8 ‐71.0

‐16.9 ‐9.3

‐63.2 ‐58.7‐105.7

‐291.6

‐7.2

88.5 81.5 71.228.0

54.0 54.0 51.0

Page 4: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Dropping Unemployment Rate

4

0%

4%

8%

12%

16%

Jan-08

Jul-08

Jan-09

Jul-09

Jan-10

Jul-10

Jan-11

Jul-11

Jan-12

Jul-12

Jan-13

Jul-13

Jan-14

Jul-14

5.6% Dec 14

6.3% Dec 14

Source:  MI Bureau of Labor Market Information and  U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1/9/2015)

14.2%Aug 09

10.0%Oct 09

Michigan

U.S.

Page 5: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

5

Rising Personal Incomes

Michigan Personal Income Year‐Over‐Year % Change

Note: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.  2014‐2017 estimates are 1/16/15 Consensus Forecast.  1/20/15.      Consensus Forecast

1.1% 0.6%

2.8%3.4%

2.6% 2.6% 2.6%1.6%

‐4.4%

2.3%

5.9%

3.9%

1.4%

4.2% 4.3% 4.4% 4.3%

Page 6: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

6

• Identify special challenges• Pay our debts• Manage our expenses

o Tightening our belto Regular expenseso Proper maintenanceo Needed improvements

• Save for the future• Return any extra resources

Budget Responsibly Like a Family

Page 7: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

7

• Changes in revenue estimateso Legacy tax credits

• May ballot proposal

Two Major Budget Challenges

Page 8: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

8

• Huge awards made in last decade; impact thru 2032• Clear lack of transparency on benefits and timing• Replaced with transparent program in 2011• Action steps: 

o Better visibilityo Understanding long‐term impact

Legacy Tax Credits

Page 9: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

6.7%($591.7)

4.4%($407.6)

8.5%($813.6)

‐4.3%(‐$384.8)

‐3.1%(‐$297.8)

‐4.8%(‐$465.2)

3.8%($431.1) 2.5%

($274.2) 1.1%($122.0)

0.7%($82.7)

0.3%($41.1)

0.3%($30.7)

‐8.0%

‐6.0%

‐4.0%

‐2.0%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

‐‐‐‐‐ 25.1% 50.9% 57.4% 98.1% 80.8%

($171.0) ($476.6) (‐$173.3) (‐$251.8) (‐$350.9)

General FundSchool Aid Fund

GF & SAF Revenue Estimate Error Rates($ in millions)

Negative = Actual < Estimate When Budget Enacted (FY15 & FY16:  Jan ‘15 Est. < May ‘14 Est.)Positive = Actual > Estimate When Budget Enacted (FY15 & FY16:  Jan ‘15 Est. > May ‘14 Est.)

% of Error Due to MBT

Page 10: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

10

MEGA vs Business Development Program

MEGA BDP• Averaged $1.8 billion in awards each year 

from 2008‐2010• Impact on General Fund very difficult to 

forecast• Funded via “credit card” to be paid in 

future years• Variable effectiveness: in certain years far 

fewer jobs realized than forecasted• $14,310 per job1 (job creation)• $74,661 per job1 (retention)

• Averaged less than $100 million in awards each year from 2012‐2014 

• Impact on General Fund known with certainty

• Funded via “checkbook”; appropriated and paid for up front

• Strong effectiveness: approximately 100% of jobs forecasted are realized

• $6,818 per job2 (job creation)

1. Present value at a 2% discount rate. Data set contains all MEGA liabilities from 2010‐2031.2. Data set contains all approved MBDP deals from FY2011‐FY15 (as of January 5, 2015).

Page 11: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Paying Our Debts• 2011 Reforms

o MPSERSo SERS

• Payment plans in place• Better for:

o Our kidso Our retireeso All of us

11

Page 12: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Reforms Result in Savings

12

* When reforms passed in 2011 (SERS) and 2012 (MPSERS)

More than $20B reduction in liabilities

Page 13: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

• Savings from reforms equals $644M or $475 per K‐12 student in FY 16

• FY 16 funding recommendation is $815M or $600 per   K‐12 student 

• These two actions translate into $1.46B or $1,075 per K‐12 student in MPSERS districts in FY 16

Reforms Result in Savings

13

Page 14: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

14

Paying for Our Legacy Costs – Schools

Page 15: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

15

Paying for Our Legacy Costs – Corrections

Page 16: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

16

More Efficient Government

2015 as of Jan. 3, 2015

• State workforce down more than 15,000 since 2001

Page 17: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Saving for a Rainy Day

17

$1,264

$994

$145

$0$81

$2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2

$365

$506

$386

$498

$611

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

Millions

Fiscal Year

The Budget Stabilization Fund (BSF) Peaked at $1.3 Billion in FY 2000, but Had to be Rebuilt. FY16 Deposit of $95M One‐time and $17.5 Million Ongoing.

Page 18: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

18

FY15 and FY16 Budget Recommendations

Page 19: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

19

Solving the Shortfall

Page 20: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

20

2015 Executive Order• Protects:

o Students K‐12 Higher education Community colleges

o Revenue sharing

Page 21: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

21

FY 2015 State Agency Reductions$ in millions

Community Health$51 25%

Technology, Management and 

Budget$36.8 18%

Corrections$23.7 11%

Human Services$23.5 11%

State Police$23.3 11%

Strategic Fund$22 11%

Treasury$11.1 5%

Education$9.6 5%

Quality of Life agencies

$6 3%

Other$0.3 

less than 1%

Total Agency Reductions: $207.3M

Page 22: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

221.8%

‐7.4%2.7%

‐51.0%‐0.1%

‐9.8%0.0%

‐2.2%‐18.1%

‐2.0%‐39.6%

3.5%‐2.1%

172.7%‐1.7%

0.0%‐13.5%

‐3.4%‐3.1%

‐7.6%‐3.7%‐3.7%

‐7.7%

Treasury OperationsTreasury ‐ Michigan Strategic Fund

Treasury ‐ Debt ServiceTransportation

Technology, Management and BudgetState Police

State Building AuthorityState

Natural ResourcesMilitary and Veterans Affairs

Licensing and Regulatory AffairsLegislatureJudiciary

Insurance and Financial ServicesHuman ServicesExecutive Office

Environmental QualityEducation

CorrectionsCommunity Health

Civil RightsAttorney General

Agriculture and Rural Development

State Agency GF Spending Down 6.5% from 2015

Total Agency increases = $11.2 millionTotal Agency increases = $11.2 million

Total Agency decreases = ‐$572.6 millionTotal Agency decreases = ‐$572.6 million

Page 23: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

23

2016 Strategic Investments• Education

o Pre to 3• Skilled trades• Public safety• Health and human services

Page 24: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Continuing Education as a Priority

24

$10.7B+   $1.2B$11.9B

* Does not include federal funding, adult education funding or preschool funding

Page 25: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Education: Focus on Student Growth• Foundation allowance: $108M ($75 per‐pupil)• At risk funding increase: $100M• Distressed district rehabilitation: $75M• Technology infrastructure grants: $25M• Third grade reading initiative: $25M

25

Page 26: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Building Blocks for Success: Pre to 3

26

• Previous early childhood investments are paying off• Additional investments to do more

o Create commission outside of state governmento Home visitso Parental involvemento Diagnostic testingo Teacher trainingo Measure for success

Page 27: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Strengthening Higher Education

27

• Community collegeso Operations: $4.3M, 1.4 percent increaseo MPSERS: $17.2M increaseo Adult part‐time student grants: $6M

• Universities/student financial aido Operations: $28M, 2 percent increaseo MPSERS: $2.7M increaseo Tuition restraint at 2.8 percent

Page 28: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Prioritizing Skilled Trades• FY16 Investments: $35.6M, including:

o Career and Technical Education Early/Middle College programs: $17.8M

o Skilled Trades: $10M increase; $20M totalo Student outreach, career planning and dual enrollment 

enhancements: $4.3M• Existing related programs: $47.6M

Total investment: $83M

28

Page 29: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Prioritizing Public Safety

29

• $7.7M to train 75 MSP troopers• $1M to train 10 motor carrier officers• $3.4M to resolve sexual assault cases

o $1.7M to process DNAo $1.7M for prosecution

• $500,000 to help prevent                                              sexual assaults on campuses

• $1.5M related to drug policy                                    initiative 

Page 30: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Improving Access to Health and Human Services

30

• Expand Healthy Kids Dental program to three remaining counties based on age (0–8 year olds): $21.8Mo Will cover an additional 210,000 children in Wayne, Oakland 

and Kent countieso Total coverage: 822,000 Michigan children

• Adult dental: $23Mo Increases access to dental care for all existing adult Medicaid 

recipients, pending timely rebid• Mental Health Commission recommendation for residential 

treatment for youth: $1.9M

Page 31: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

• Enrollment in Healthy Michigan Plan (HMP) has exceeded projections in both FY14 and FY15

• Currently, 536,000 Michigan residents have health coverage through HMPo Helping 1 out of 20 Michiganderso Nearly 350,000 primary and preventive care visits

• Since April 2014 Michigan providers have received an additional $1.4B in federal Medicaid reimbursement

Ensuring A Healthier Michigan

31

Page 32: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Supporting Our Local Communities

32

• Constitutional revenue sharing: $23.8M increase• Ongoing statutory funding for eligible municipalities that 

meet accountability/transparency requirements• County revenue sharing and incentive programs, added two 

counties: $3.5M increase

Page 33: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Tackling the Tough Choices

33

• Health Insurance Claims Assessment (HICA) is a tax on paid health insurance claims made by third party administrators, health insurance carriers and self‐insured entitieso Medicare and Medicaid fee‐for‐service are exempt

• HICA was enacted to ensure federal match dollars for Medicaid and was designed to produce $400M in revenue

• HICA is not producing the needed revenue to guarantee our full Medicaid match, requiring action on our part

• To ensure receipt of all federal dollars, the recommendation moves HICA from 0.75 percent to 1.3 percent

Page 34: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

34

• Technologyo $70M in IT Investment Fund Portfolioo Includes $7M to strengthen cybersecurity efforts

• State infrastructure: $31M for building maintenanceo More than $108M GF has been invested over the last three 

years for state agency facilities and the Capitol complex

Efficient State Government Saving Taxpayer Dollars

Page 35: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Investing in Cybersecurity

35

• The cyber threat is realo Over 730,000 attacks per day

• Problem is only getting worse o Multiple states falling victim to large data breaches o Attacks increasing on a daily basis

• $7M increase recommended to proactively protect our computer systems, networks, and sensitive citizen data

Page 36: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Investing in Infrastructure

36

• Replaced collapsed roof

• Capitol dome restoration

• HVAC upgrades• Fire suppression, 

smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors in hospital patient rooms

• Upgrades at various armories

Page 37: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Years of neglect has created a transportation safety crisis

37

Page 38: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

OF BRIDGES ARE IN NEED OF REPAIR, IMPROVEMENT OR REPLACEMENT

27%

Page 39: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

48%

48% of major roads in Michigan's largest cities are in poor or mediocre condition

Page 40: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

The Costs

40

Page 41: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

MEDICALCOSTS

PRODUCTIVITYCOSTS

WORKPLACECOSTS

TRAVELDELAYS

INSURANCECOSTS

LEGALCOSTS

$ 8.1 Billion

$

The Cost of Crashes

Page 42: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

42

• Michiganders pay $2.5 Billion per year in vehicle operation costs ‐ $357 per driver

• Roadway conditions are a significant factor in approximately 1/3 of traffic fatalities

The Cost of Bad Roads

Page 43: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

43

• Brutal Michigan winters• Poor approach to repair• Industry and heavy trucks• Lack of investment

How Things Got So Bad

Page 44: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

MN$315

IL$235

OH$235 WI

$231 IN$187 MI

$174

Highway Investment Per Capita

Page 45: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

4

Trunkline Pavement Condition Forecast

Based on Current Investment, 2015‐2027

Percent Good or Fair Condition

90%

70%

50%

30%

Statewide

National

Regional

Local

2015                 2017                    2019                  2021                  2023                  2025           2027   

Page 46: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

46

• Increasingly dangerous conditions• Massive cost of road reconstruction

Cost of Doing Nothing

Page 47: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

• Fixes Michigan’s crumbling roads• Protects schools and local government• Provides tax relief for low income residents• Competitive fuel prices

47

Ballot Proposal Impact

Page 48: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Sales Taxes Replenish Schools and Local Governments

All State Fuel Taxes Usedfor Transportation Purposes

+ $1.3 BFor Transportation

+ $300 MFor Schools

+ $94 MFor Local Governments

Page 49: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

6604

2249

49

1079

2938

Miles of Reconstruction

MilesRehabilitation

Ballot Proposal Impact

Reconstruction and Rehabilitation2015‐2027

ProposalCurrent

Page 50: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Ballot Proposal Impact on Debt Service

2015‐2027

CurrentPlanUnderProposal

$200 M

$100 M

$02015                                                                                       2027

Page 51: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

51

Video

Page 52: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Accelerating the Comeback

52

• Ongoingo Transportation: Comprehensive funding solutiono Healthy Kids Dental o Education K‐12: School retirement system   Universities/Community Colleges/Skilled Trades

o Public safety o Local government funding

• One‐timeo Grow reserves

Ballot proposal

Expanding to three remaining counties

Funding retirement obligations Increased 

investment

Added funding for new counties

Growing to more than $600M

Running another recruit school

Page 53: Budget Presentation Final - Print [Read-Only]...22 1.8% ‐7.4% 2.7% ‐51.0% ‐0.1% ‐9.8% 0.0% ‐2.2% ‐18.1% ‐2.0% ‐39.6% 3.5% ‐2.1% 172.7% ‐1.7% 0.0% ‐13.5% ‐3.4%

Questions?

Thank you.

53