Budget 0506

download Budget 0506

of 124

Transcript of Budget 0506

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    1/124

    Union Budget - Analysis

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    2/124

    Should you require any clarifications on the information contained in this report,

    call CRIS INFAC at its client servicing number: 91-22-56913561/562, or e-mail us at

    [email protected]

    CRISIL Limited offers a comprehensive range of integrated product and service offerings real time news, analysed data, incisive insights and opinion, and expert advice - to enable investors,

    issuers, policy makers de-risk their business and financial decision making, take informed investment

    decisions and develop workable solutions. CRISIL Limited helps to precisely understand, measure

    and calibrate myriad risks - financial and credit risks, price and market risks, exchange and liquidity

    risks, operational, strategic and regulatory risks.

    CRISIL Limiteds Business: Ratings Advisory, Research & Information, Investment & Risk Management

    leverage the organization's core competencies in the areas of risk identification, quantification and

    assessment. CRISIL Limited has built a tremendous repertoire of skills and capabilities to tap

    the latent and diverse needs of the marketplace.

    Strategic Alliance: Standard & Poor's International Ratings LLC, consolidated with its 9.68%

    shareholding stake in CRISIL Limited, offers access to global best practices, besides enhancing

    CRISIL Limiteds high standards and international credibility. Continuous training and working together

    with Standard & Poor's has contributed significantly towards creating world-class resources within

    CRISIL Limited, while strengthening the innovative edge of CRISIL Limiteds businesses.

    People Resources: A talent base of over 300 professionals, drawn from leading management,

    engineering and other academic institutions are among the most significant business drivers. They

    have enabled CRISIL Limited to pioneer varied initiatives and develop an unparalleled multi-disciplinary

    knowledge base and understanding of the dynamics of the Indian economy, industry sectors, capital

    and financial markets and its constituents. Spread across 12 offices in 8 different locations in

    the country, the widespread geographical reach allows CRISIL Limited to penetrate deeper into

    the community of issuers, investors and clients.

    Success Factors: CRISIL Limited operates on the basic principles of analytical rigour, independence,

    objectivity, integrity and innovation. Commitment and consistent adherence to these principles across

    businesses, a young and dynamic management team, the guidance of a visionary Board of Directors

    and the support of a diversified institutional ownership have significantly contributed to CRISIL

    Limiteds success.

    About CRISIL Limited

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    3/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    i

    Foreword 1

    Economy

    Highlights 4

    Detailed economic analysis 6

    Industry

    Overall sectoral impact 18

    Overall company impact 24

    Auto ancillaries 30

    Capital goods 32

    Cars and utility vehicles 34

    Cement 36

    Chlor alkalies 38

    Cigarettes 40

    Commercial vehicles 42

    Consumer durables 44

    Cotton and cotton yarn 46

    Fertilisers 48

    Hotels 50

    Information technology 52

    Man-made fibres 54

    Non-ferrous metals 56

    Oil and gas 58

    Paints 62

    Paper 64

    Personal care and detergents 66

    Petrochemicals: Basic and polymers 68Petrochemicals: Downstream 70

    Pharmaceuticals 72

    Shipping 74

    Steel 76

    Sugar 78

    Tea and coffee 80

    Telecom cables 82

    Continued...

    Contents

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    4/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    ii

    Contents...continued

    1) All domestic prices are ex-factory prices, unless indicated otherwise.

    2) All international prices are cif prices, unless indicated otherwise.

    3) Wherever the domestic prices are ex-factory prices, the landed costs do not include CVD. Wherever the domestic prices

    are market prices, the landed costs include CVD.

    4) Landed costs, customs and excise duties for 2004-05 include the education cess of 2 per cent.

    Data notes

    Telecom equipments 84

    Telecom services 86

    Tractors 88

    Two-wheelers 90

    Tyres 92

    Diversified companies 94

    InfrastructurePower 100

    Port 102

    Roads 103

    Other infrastructure 105

    Banking and financial sector

    Banking and financial sector 108

    Capital markets

    Debt markets 112

    Equity market 117

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    5/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    1

    It was quite clear before the Budget that Mr Chidambaram would have to deal with a number of

    conflicting objectives. Increasing spending on rural development and infrastructure, in general, would

    have to be tempered by the need to adhere to the fiscal responsibility targets. Tax reforms would

    also be subject to the same constraint. The new awards by the Finance Commission would have to

    be factored into the calculation. When all of these limits were recognised, how much room would

    he actually have to manoeuvre?

    Obviously, not a lot, but as things turned out, the leeway was used with a reasonable degree of

    effectiveness. Tax reforms are something that are controlled by his ministry and are virtually certain

    to be implemented as presented in the Budget. The Budget has to be judged to a large extent by

    what has been done on this front.

    On direct taxes, there has been a significant streamlining of the personal tax regime. The anomalies

    have been ironed out, and the brackets have been re-structured. Section 88 exemptions, which gave

    a tax rebate for savings channelised into post office and public provident schemes and infrastructure

    bonds, have been eliminated. This is a very positive move, because other than the infrastructure bonds,

    these savings were not really going into any kind of capital formation. This elimination has been

    offset by a blanket exemption of Rs 100,000 on income for savings, presumably including pensionand other long-term instruments, which are more likely to be deployed in the creation of fixed assets.

    The corporate tax rate has been reduced from 35 per cent to 30 per cent, without any elimination

    of exemptions. This is clearly good news in the short term for corporate earnings, but we must remember

    that the logic of tax rate reductions is tied to the phasing out of exemptions. Given the expected

    buoyancy in earnings this year, the rate reduction should not result in a large revenue loss, if any,

    but in the event of an economic downturn, the lower rates with persistent exemptions might upset

    the fiscal calculations significantly.

    It should be reasonable to expect that the exemptions will be eliminated sooner or later and, as a

    consequence, the long-term prospect is for the effective tax rate to go up rather than down for many

    corporates. Ultimately, an optimal tax rate for a zero exemption scenario has to be worked out and

    the whole transition accomplished as smoothly as possible. Better sooner rather than later.

    There are big spending initiatives on the social and infrastructure sectors, but clearly, the committed

    resources have not kept pace with the aspirations. In fact, aggregate plan spending in this Budget

    is actually lower than was budgeted last year, although it represents a Rs 6,000 crore increase over

    the revised estimates. The slack in spending plans is, ultimately, what gives the government some

    room to keep the deficit in check.

    ForewordA delicate balance

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    6/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    2

    ForewordThe one sector that is proven to have delivered is highways. The Budget has wisely committed an

    extra Rs 2,800 crore to this programme, taking the total government spending up to Rs 9,200 crore.

    This will clearly sustain the momentum to industrial demand and employment that the programme has

    provided over the last 3-4 years. It is sensible to place one's bets on tired and tested horses.

    Overall, this is a Budget that finds the balance between fiscal and political compulsions. On many

    fronts, it relies on the efficiency of various ministries and departments to deliver. But, that has always

    been the case and is a broader problem for the government as a whole to address. The finance minister

    cannot be expected to take the entire burden of the government on his shoulders.

    Dr Subir Gokarn

    Chief Economist, CRISIL

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    7/124

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    Economy

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    8/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    4

    HighlightsGrowth

    The performance of industry and services is expected to remain buoyant during 2005-06. The indications

    of a pick-up in the investment activity augur well for the growth prospects of industry in the coming

    year, and services are expected to continue with their high growth performance. Overall, we expect

    India's GDP to grow in the range of 6.75-7.00 per cent during 2005-06.

    Inflation

    This Budget will not have much impact on inflation. Indirect taxes have been estimated to be revenue

    neutral, so the prices of inputs, especially petroleum and diesel, will not be impacted much. Also,

    the inflation scenario is far more dependent on factors such as domestic capacity utilisation and global

    commodity prices. We expect the inflation rate to be at about 5 per cent during 2005-06.

    Fiscal scenario

    This remains the area of concern. The government has not been able to meet the rolling targets of

    2005-06 presented in the last year's Budget and has put the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management

    Act (FRBM) on the back burner for the time being. In the 2005-06 Budget, the government expects

    the fiscal deficit to GDP ratio to be 4.3 per cent. Our assessment is that the revenue estimates for

    2005-06 are quite optimistic and we expect a revenue shortfall of around Rs 8,600 crore to Rs 12,400

    crore. Consequently, we expect the fiscal deficit to be 4.5-4.7 per cent of GDP against the target of

    4.3 per cent.

    Interest rates

    Driven by higher market borrowings of Rs 8,600-12,400 crore in conjunction with higher global interest

    rates, continuance of wider coverage of the service tax net, revenue from dividends and profits and

    interest cost savings, we expect the benchmark ten-year yield at 7.25 per cent by the end of March

    2006.

    Equity markets

    Armed with tax rationalisation measures and the focus on infrastructure development, the Budget is

    clearly a reform-oriented one. Lowering of corporate tax and custom tariffs will boost the earnings

    of the corporates. This, together with the exemption on savings of Rs 100,000, will help channelise

    the savings to the markets and will, thus, add a fillip to the market sentiment. We thus see the

    Budget as substantially equipped to support the strong market sentiment.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    9/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    5

    HighlightsExchange rates

    While the Budget does not directly impact the exchange rate, the introduction of a special purpose

    vehicle (SPV), which will utilise foreign exchange reserves for funding infrastructure projects, may ease

    the pressure of appreciation on the rupee if the scheme increases the demand for forex. At current

    levels, however, it will only absorb $2 billion out of the reserve of $133 billion - which is of hardly

    any significance. More importantly, the reduction in import duties will increase the demand for forex

    and ease the upward pressure. The rupee is expected to be stable around the Rs 44/$ mark during

    2005-06.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    10/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    6

    Detailed economic analysisI. Economic backdrop

    The economic setting for the making of Budget 2005-06 could not have been better. The year 2004-

    05 started with the spectre of drought, spiralling inflation and firming up of crude prices. But the

    scenario has completely changed towards the end of the year. With inflation down to 5 per cent and

    growth estimated at 6.9 per cent, the year is ending with good news on the growth and inflation

    fronts. After initial jitters, the Sensex too has zoomed, buoyed by strong growth and foreign institutional

    investor (FII) inflows. India's long-term currency rating has recently been notched up by S&P to BB+.

    Improved growth scenario

    The fears of the initial monsoon failure scaling down the overall GDP growth have been completely

    warded off by the robust performance of the industrial and services sectors, which grew at 7.8 per

    cent and 8.9 per cent, respectively, in 2004-05. Agriculture is the only sector to have witnessed growth

    deceleration. What is noteworthy is that the poor performance of agriculture had no perceptible impact

    on industrial activity, indicating a gradual insulation of industry from the vagaries of monsoons. Also,

    the high crude prices failed to dampen industrial activity. The indications of a pick-up in investment

    activity augur well for the growth prospects in the coming year. The overall GDP growth of 6.9 per

    cent over a high base of 8.5 per cent is quite commendable. Buoyed by the recent growth patterns,

    the Economic Survey notes a possible ratcheting up of the trend rate of growth of the economy,

    from around 6 per cent to about 7 per cent per year. Given that the current growth pick-up is accompanied

    by the upswing in saving and investment rates, the scenario is reminiscent of the growth performance

    during the boom phase of 1994-95 to 1996-97.

    Inflation moderates but interest rates firm

    Inflationary pressures started building up in the beginning of this year, and by July 2004 inflation

    had crossed 8 per cent. Inflation in the first 10 months of 2004-05 stood at 6.7 per cent. The price

    rise was spread across all the three major categories, namely primary articles, manufactured products

    and the fuel group. The recent downturn in inflation notwithstanding, the average inflation for 2004-

    05 is expected to be 6.5 per cent. The current bout of inflation was primarily a cost-push phenomenon

    led by a sharp upturn in petroleum and metal prices. Duty reduction and improvement in the agricultural

    scenario, supported by a favourable base effect, has tamed inflation to around 5 per cent now. The

    higher inflationary pressures translated into higher interest rates. The 10-year G-sec rates rose by 100

    basis points in the current fiscal.

    External scenario

    Both exports and imports have maintained their buoyancy during April-January 2004-05. With exports

    growing at 25 per cent and imports at 35 per cent the trade deficit widened to over $22 billion. The

    ballooning of the import bill was on account of a sharp rise in crude prices and a genuine demandfor non-oil imports stemming from a pick-up in industrial activity. The current account position is,

    however, comfortable due to a positive balance on trade in services. The foreign exchange reserves,

    at $132 billion in mid-February, can support 15.5 months of imports.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    11/124

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    12/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    8

    Detailed economic analysisBudget had pointed out a revenue shortfall of Rs 20,000 crore, which was later revised to Rs 12,000

    crore in December.

    Table 1: Fiscal marksmanship

    Fiscal

    deficit

    Revenue

    deficit

    Plan

    expenditure

    Non-plan

    expenditure

    Total

    expenditure

    Gross tax

    revenue

    Industrial

    growth

    1999-00 31 24.8 -1.1 7.2 5 2.5 6.6

    2000-01 6.8 10.1 -6.2 -3 -3.8 -2.5 5

    2001-02 21.2 27.1 6.4 -5.1 -3.4 -17.5 2.7

    2002-03 -3.1 13.1 -1.8 -2.7 -2.4 -8.3 5.8

    2003-04 -19.8 -12.5 1.1 9.8 7.4 1.1 6.9

    2004-05 1.3 11.8 -5.6 10.9 5.9 -3.7 7.9

    Note

    Figures for 2004-05 have been computed from revised estimates.

    Source: Budget 2005-06

    The deficit targets for 2005-06 have been specified a notch above what was anticipated in the FRBM,

    thereby implying some dilution of the original FRBM targets. Table 2 presents the key budgetary arithmetic

    for 2005-06.

    Table 2: Budget at a glance 2005-06 (Rs crore)

    2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 2005-06

    Actuals BE RE BE

    1. Revenue receipts 263,878 309,322 300,904 351,200

    2. Tax revenue (net to centre) 186,982 233,906 225,804 273,466

    3. Non-tax revenue 76,896 75,416 75,100 77,734

    4. Capital receipts (5+6+7) 207,490 168,507 204,887 163,144

    5. Recoveries of loans 67,265 27,100 61,565 12,000

    6. Other receipts 16,953 4,000 4,091

    7. Borrowings and other liabilities 123,272 137,407 139,231 151,144

    8. Total receipts (1+4) 471,368 477,829 505,791 514,344

    9. Non-plan expenditure 349,088 332,239 368,404 370,847

    10. On revenue account 283,502 293,650 296,396 330,530of which

    Interest payments 124,088 129,500 125,905 133,945

    12. On capital account 65,586 38,589 72,008 40,317

    13. Plan expenditure 122,280 145,590 137,387 143,497

    14. On revenue account 78,638 91,843 89,673 115,982

    15. On capital account 43,642 53,747 47,714 27,515

    16. Total expenditure 471,368 477,829 505,791 514,344

    17. Revenue expenditure 362,140 385,493 386,069 446,512

    18. Capital expenditure 109,228 92,336 119,722 67,832

    19. Revenue deficit 98,262 76,171 85,165 95,312

    As a percentage of GDP 3.6 2.5 2.7 2.7

    20. Fiscal deficit 123,272 137,407 139,231 151,144

    As a percentage of GDP 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.3

    21. Primary deficit -816 7,907 13,326 17,199

    As a percentage of GDP 0 0.3 0.4 0.5

    Source: Budget 2005-06

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    13/124

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    14/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    10

    Detailed economic analysis

    III. The revenue arithmetic

    The gross revenue targets in 2004-05 fell short of the Budget estimates by Rs 11,712 crore. Are the

    revenue targets set for 2005-06 achievable?

    Revenue targets in 2005-06

    The Budget assumes a growth of 20.9 per cent in gross revenues in 2005-06BE over a high growth

    of 20.3 per cent in 2004-05. This translates into an increase in the tax/GDP ratio to 10.5 per cent

    in 2005-06 from 9.8 per cent in 2004-05. The implicit tax buoyancy is about 1.6. Table 4 documents

    the share of major taxes in the gross tax revenues, their performance in 2004-05 and expectation in

    2005-06BE.

    Table 3b: Rolling fiscal indicators set in 2004-05

    Budget estimates

    2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

    Revenue deficit as a percentage of GDP 2.5 1.8 1.1

    Fiscal deficit as percentage of GDP 4.4 4 3.6

    Gross tax revenue as a percentage of GDP 10.2 11.1 12.1

    Total outstanding liabilities at the end of the

    year as a percentage of GDP for the year

    68.5 68.2 67.8

    Source: Medium-term fiscal policy statement, Union Budget 2004-05

    Targets for

    Table 4: Tax revenues of the central government

    Tax heads % Share

    (2004-05) 04-05/03-04 05-06BE/04-05

    Gross tax revenue 100 20.3 20.9

    Excise 32.9 11 20.7

    Corporate 27.1 30.6 33.2

    Customs 18.4 15.7 -5.5

    Income tax 16.6 23.1 30.1

    Service 4.6 79.3 23.7Other taxes 0.3 -54 2.7

    Net tax revenue (centre) 73.8 20.8 21.1

    Source: Budget 2005-06

    % Growth

    The revenue buoyancy projected in 2005-06 relies heavily on the performance of corporate and income

    tax. Significant increases of 33.2 per cent and 30.1 per cent have been budgeted in corporate and

    income tax during 2005-06. The overall revenue receipts (net to the Centre) are budgeted to grow

    by 21.1 per cent in 2005-06 as against the observed growth of 20.8 per cent in the previous year.

    No target has been set for disinvestment receipts.

    The overall tax buoyancy has improved significantly in the last 2-3 years. An important reason for

    this is the revival of industrial growth on which the tax collections of the government critically depend.

    Box 1 examines the recent shifts in tax buoyancy and its relation to the industrial growth patterns.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    15/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    11

    Detailed economic analysisBox 1: Tax buoyancy and industrial growth

    While reviewing the patterns in the overall tax buoyancy in the last couple of years, this section

    attempts to examine the relationship between the buoyancy in tax collection and the industrial

    activity. The following figure charts the changes in tax buoyancy (ratio of growth in tax collection

    to GDP growth) against industrial growth based on Index of Industrial Production (IIP). We have

    divided the period since 1993-94 into three sub periods: 1993-94 to 1996-97 (period of high growth)

    followed by 1997-98 to 2001-02 (period of downturn) and ending with another recovery phase,

    2002-03 to 2004-05.

    Figure 1: Tax buoyancy and industrial growth

    Source: CRISIL estimates

    The overall tax buoyancy moved more or less in tandem with the industrial performance. It dipped

    during the period of downturn and shot up again during the recovery period. However, the overall

    tax buoyancy hit a high of 1.5 during period III, a sharper acceleration than dictated by the

    acceleration in industrial growth. What had contributed to such an improvement in tax collection?

    As we looked into performance of specific tax groups, buoyancy in direct taxes turned out to

    be much higher than buoyancy in indirect taxes and direct tax buoyancy did not see a dip even

    during the lean phase of 1997-98 to 2001-02. However, the trend over time reveals that the performance

    of indirect taxes (consisting of customs and excise) is very closely related to industrial performance

    - buoyancy in industry tends to improve the customs and excise duty collection.

    But the relatively high growth in tax collection during the past couple of years actually came

    about because of surge in corporate tax collection. Corporate tax buoyancy has improved substantiallyduring the ongoing industrial recovery - buoyancy in corporate taxes has moved up from 1.5

    during 1997-98 to 2001-02 to 2.8 during 2002-03 to 2004-05. Income tax buoyancy, on the other

    1.2

    1.5

    0.7

    0.0

    0.3

    0.6

    0.9

    1.2

    1.5

    1.8

    93-94 to 96-97 97-98 to 01-02 02-03 to 04-05

    TaxBuoyancy

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    Indsutrialgrowth

    Tax Buoyancy Industrial Growth

    Continued...

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    16/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    12

    Detailed economic analysis...continued

    hand, does not show any linkages with the industrial performance. The income tax buoyancy was

    1.5 during the first high growth phase, went up slightly to 1.6 during the following lean phase

    and came down to 1.4 during the industrial recovery onset since 2002-03.

    Table 5: Tax buoyancy

    Indirect tax

    Income tax Custom + Excise

    1993-94 to 1996-97 1.2 1.5 1.1

    1997-98 to 2001-02 0.7 1.6 0.6

    2002-03 to 2004-05 1.5 1.4 0.9

    Source: CRISIL estimates

    1.4

    1.5

    2.8

    Tax buoyancy

    Gross tax Direct tax

    Corporate tax

    The other important factor behind the high tax buoyancy is the widening of the tax base by inclusion

    of new services into the tax net. The buoyancy in gross tax collection would fall to 1.4 during

    2002-03 to 2004-05 from 1.5, if we exclude services tax from it. Though still contributing a very

    small amount to total tax collection, the services tax elasticity with respect to services sector GDP

    stood at 6.4 during 2002-03 to 2004-05. This shows that despite the recent attempts at wideningthe tax base there is excessive reliance of the exchequer on industry.

    To sum up, there is no denying that tax collection is linked to the industrial performance, as

    the overall tax buoyancy tends to pick up during high industrial growth phase. And the ongoing

    recovery has witnessed much higher tax buoyancy than during 1993-94 to 1996-97. Part of this

    can be explained by the structural change in tax collection - though still around 4.5 per cent

    of the overall gross tax collection, services tax revenue has improved over the years (the share

    was not even 1 per cent during the mid-1990s).

    To examine the veracity of tax revenues, we link it with the implicit GDP growth for industry in the

    Budget.

    Growth assumptions

    The Budget assumes a nominal GDP growth of 13.6 per cent for 2005-06. Under the assumption of

    5.0-5.5 per cent inflation, this translates into a high real growth of over 8.0 per cent. Given the buoyancy

    in the industrial and services sector, and under the assumption of normal monsoons, this could be

    achieved. We expect real GDP growth at 6.9 per cent in 2005-06 if the monsoons are normal. Is the

    growth target set in the Budget over-optimistic?

    Neither the Budget nor the three accompanying documents provide sectoral growth patterns. It is important

    to know the sectoral estimates of GDP to take a call on the revenue buoyancy in 2005-06. Given

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    17/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    13

    Detailed economic analysisgrowth deceleration in agriculture in 2004-05, growth in agricultural GDP in 2005-06 can be assumed

    at 3 per cent. Assuming that the buoyancy in services will continue, 8.3 per cent growth is feasible.

    The industrial growth required to deliver 8 per cent real GDP growth would be around 11 per cent.

    Table 6 documents the expected shortfall in gross tax revenues under alternate assumptions of industrial

    growth. The estimates of gross tax revenues (except the revenues from the services sector) have been

    computed using the ratio of tax collections to nominal industrial GDP observed during 2003-04 and

    2004-05. The service sector revenues have been assumed at the same level as budgeted.

    If the average tax/industrial GDP observed in 2004-05 is assumed, we get a revenue shortfall of Rs

    12,439 crore and Rs 8,689 crore for industrial growth of 7 per cent and 8 per cent, respectively. The

    revenue shortfall factors in the positive revenue impact of direct tax proposals of Rs 6,000 crore.

    Assuming the expenditure targets are met, the revenue shortfall will lead to a slippage of the fiscal

    deficit from 4.3 per cent to 4.5-4.6 per cent of GDP.

    Table 6: Tax revenues and industrial growth 2005-06

    Industrialgrowth

    Industrialinflation

    Nominalindustrial

    growth

    Grosstax

    revenue

    (EST)

    Grosstax

    revenue

    (BE)

    Expectedshortfall

    7 5.5 12.5 357,586 370,025 12,439

    8 5.7 13.7 361,336 370,025 8,689

    9 6 15 365,399 370,025 4,626

    Source: CRISIL Simulations

    2005-06

    IV. Expenditure drivers

    Expenditure patterns

    A higher rise in Plan expenditure (4.45 per cent growth) vis--vis non-Plan expenditure (0.66 per cent)

    has been budgeted in 2005-06. The overall expenditure (Plan and Non-Plan) on health and education

    has gone up by more than 22 per cent and 36 per cent, respectively, in 2005-06 BE. While Plan allocations

    have increased sharply (by 38 per cent), non-Plan expenditure has gone up by only 3 per cent on

    health and education. As per the National Common Minimum Programme (NCMP), the spending on

    education and health is to be raised to at least 6 per cent and 2-3 per cent of GDP, respectively,

    over the next few years. Though the overall expenditure on health and education has increased, it

    is still less than what was promised in the NCMP.

    It was also mentioned in the NCMP that subsidies are not to be reduced but targeted better, with

    immediate effect. Defence expenditure, another important item under non-Plan expenditure, has been

    budgeted to increase by only 8 per cent.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    18/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    14

    Detailed economic analysisAs per the Twelfth Finance Commission recommendations, the share of the states in the net proceeds

    of shareable central taxes shall be 30.5 per cent during 2005-10, inclusive of additional excise duty

    in lieu of sales tax. The total outgo to the states on this account works out to Rs 6,13,112 crore

    as compared with the last Finance Commission where it was Rs 3,76,318 crore. The share of the states

    in central tax increased by only 2.9 per cent and 8.5 per cent in 2001-02 and 2002-03, respectively.

    In the present Budget, the share has increased to 21 per cent. The gross hit to the Central government

    has been estimated at Rs 26,000 crore in 2005-06.

    One important and new aspect of expenditure in the present budget is the value added tax (VAT),which has been proposed to be introduced with effect from April 1, 2005. The Central government

    has agreed to compensate the states, according to an agreed formula, (Central government will provide

    100 per cent compensation to the states in 2005-06, 75 per cent in 2006-07 and 50 per cent during

    2007- 08 for the loss, if any, on account of the introduction of VAT) in the event of any revenue

    loss. However, no provision for the same has been made in the Budget.

    The government has increased allocation for the national food for work programme, mid-day meal scheme,

    Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, etc.

    Plan outlay

    The NCMP aimed at increasing expenditure on agriculture and rural development, infrastructure, social

    sectors and employment generation. To fund the Plan outlays, there has been higher reliance on

    internal and extra budgetary resources (IEBR) than on budgetary support. At the aggregate level, the

    IEBR for the above-mentioned areas has been increased by 62 per cent as compared to a 33 per

    cent rise in the budgetary allocation to Plan outlays.

    The Plan expenditure for economic services and social services has been raised by 33 per cent and

    35 per cent, respectively. As per NCMP, the public investment in agriculture, rural infrastructure and

    irrigation will be increased. Within economic services, Plan expenditure for agriculture and allied activities,

    rural development, irrigation and flood control has been increased sharply, along with the Plan expenditure

    for industry & minerals, communication, science, technology and environment, and general economic

    services. Increased Plan expenditure in agriculture and allied activities, rural development and irrigation

    & flood control reflects the government's intention to fulfil promises made in the NCMP.

    The Plan expenditure on social services has risen by a faster rate than economic services. Plan expenditures

    for education and health have been budgeted to increase by 47 per cent and 25 per cent, respectively.

    The central Plan outlay for infrastructure has been budgeted to increase by 52 per cent. Within infrastructure,the sharpest rise of about 200 per cent has been witnessed in road transport and shipping.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    19/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    15

    Detailed economic analysis

    V. Debt sustainability

    A marginal slippage in fiscal deficit in 2004-05 is attributable to a number of factors - high industrial

    growth, rise in corporate taxes due to a surge in corporate profits, and expenditure compression (on

    the Plan account), together with a high base of national income.

    Another welcome development has been the stabilisation or relatively slow growth in the debt/GDP

    ratio in the last 2 years. The internal liabilities of the Central government increased sharply from 49.7

    per cent of GDP in 1999-2000 to 60.9 per cent of GDP in 2002-03. They remained at 61.7 per cent

    and 62.3 per cent of GDP in 2003-04 and 2004-05, respectively. For 2005-06, the internal debt/GDP

    ratio is budgeted at 61.7 per cent. The stabilisation of the internal debt ratio (albeit at a high level)

    is due to positive differential of growth rates over interest rates since 2003-04. While the average

    cost of Central government debt has come down from 10 per cent in 99-20/02-03 to 8.8 per cent in

    03-04/04-05, nominal GDP growth has gone up from 9.1 per cent to 12.3 per cent in the corresponding

    period. This, together with the low deficit on the primary account, has permitted the stabilisation of

    the internal debt/GDP ratio, which is budgeted at 61.7 per cent in 2005-06.

    The declining trend of external liabilities in relation to GDP has continued in 2004-05 and the same

    is expected in 2005-06. The stabilisation of debt/GDP, together with decreasing interest cost, has moderated

    the growth in interest burden. Interest payments have come down from 4.8 per cent of GDP in 2001-

    02 to 4 per cent in 2003-04. As a percentage of revenue receipts, they have come down from 73

    per cent to 66 per cent in the corresponding period.

    Table 7. Plan expenditure by key heads of development

    2003-04 2004-05 RE 2005-06BE 2004-05 RE 2005-06BE

    Economic services 43,426 46,704 62,152 7.55 33.08

    Agriculture and allied activities 3,519 4,775 6,361 35.69 33.21

    Rural development 11,369 8,589 11,494 -24.45 33.82

    Irrigation and flood control 271 365 524 34.69 43.56

    Energy 4,323 4,402 5,197 1.83 18.06

    Industry and Minerals 2,850 3,472 4,841 21.82 39.43

    Transport 14,701 17,020 21,614 15.77 26.99

    Communication 224 276 507 23.21 83.7

    Science, technology and environment 4,170 5,294 7,075 26.95 33.64

    General economic services 1,999 2,511 4,539 25.61 80.76

    Social services 28,021 35,404 47,665 26.35 34.63

    Education art and culture 7,839 10,106 14,820 28.92 46.65

    Health and family welfare 5,564 6,944 8,711 24.8 25.45

    Water supply, sanitation, housing and urban

    development

    6,802 7,930 9,029 16.58 13.86

    Welfare of SC/ST and other backward classes 1,128 1,250 1,490 10.82 19.2

    Labour and labour welfare 118 157 208 33.05 32.48

    Social welfare and nutrition 2,173 2,423 3,819 11.5 57.61

    Source: Budget documents

    Rs crore Growth

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    20/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    16

    Detailed economic analysisThe above positive developments, however, do not call for complacency. Although the ills associated

    with high deficits have not manifested themselves in terms of rising interest rates, inflation and pre-

    emption of private investment, now that private investment has perked up, the need to keep debt

    and deficit under check gains significance. The Economic Survey notes that in 2004-05 there has been

    a significant deceleration in investments in government securities by commercial banks following a

    pick-up in demand for credit from the commercial sector and lower market borrowings by the Central

    government. Between April 2004 and January 2005 the investments of commercial banks in Central

    and state government securities increased by 4.9 per cent as against 20.1 per cent during the corresponding

    period of the previous year. Thus, a scenario of high government borrowing can result in pre-emption

    of private investment in future. Further, high deficits and debt have reduced the ability of the government

    to spend in priority areas like infrastructure, health, education and employment guarantee.

    Without a concerted effort, the gains in terms of a relatively better fiscal situation in 2003-04 and

    2004-05 will prove to be shortlived. The FRBM Act was enacted and fiscal policy rules were notified

    to put a legislative ceiling on deficits. The FRBM targets have not been belied by the fiscal outcome

    of 2004-05. The proposed trajectory of debt suggests that government will have to generate a primary

    surplus to bring down the debt/GDP. The trajectory of primary deficit/surplus has, however, not been

    explicitly stated in the Medium Term Fiscal Policy Statement.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    21/124

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    22/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    18

    Industry Effect

    Overall sectoral impact

    Auto ancillaries Marginally positive

    The reduction in the peak customs duty from 20 per cent to 15 per cent will reduce the input costs

    of auto ancillary companies who import sub-components for use in their final products, such as MICO

    and Sona Koyo Steering Systems. The reduction in the peak duty on aluminium will marginally reduce

    the input costs of auto ancillary and casting & forging companies such as Bharat Forge and Rico

    Auto, which is likely to be passed on to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).

    The reduction in the customs duty on copper will marginally reduce the input cost of companies

    manufacturing electrical components such as wire harnesses; for e.g., Motherson Sumi. The reductionin the customs duty on lead from 15 per cent to 5 per cent will reduce the input costs of automotive

    battery manufacturing companies such as Exide and Amara Raja Batteries.

    The extension of 150 per cent deduction on in-house R&D till March 2007 will benefit companies

    such as MICO, PRICOL and Sundaram Brake Linings.

    Banking Positive

    The proposed amendment to the Banking Regulation Act, allowing banks to issue preference shares,

    is a positive, as it will provide them with another source of capital, which will help them in meeting

    obligations under Basel II.

    The proposed removal of floor and caps on SLR and CRR requirements will give more autonomy tothe Reserve Bank of India in effective management of the banking system.

    Allowing banks to appoint micro finance institutions (MFI) as banking correspondents will provide

    transaction services will help banks in increasing credit flow to small sectors and meet priority sector

    targets.

    The proposal to levy a 0.1 per cent tax on withdrawal of cash on a single day of Rs. 10,000/- or

    more will not have any significant impact.

    The amendment to the definition of `securities' under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956

    to include legal framework for trading of securitised debt will help deepen the securitisation market(asset-backed securitsation & mortgage-backed securitisation) in India. This is likely to benefit HFCs

    and NBFCs.

    The proposal to allow deduction of up to Rs 1 lakh on repayment of principal amount of housing

    loan will positively affect housing finance.

    Capital goods Neutral

    The cut in peak duty from 20 per cent to 15 per cent will translate into higher competition from

    imports. The cut in customs duty on textile machinery from 20 per cent to 10 per cent will affect

    domestic players like LMW. The budgetary allocation of Rs 11 billion for rural electrification programmes

    will benefit transformer manufacturers; however, an expected lag in implementation will not result in

    immediate benefits. The cut in customs duties on copper, aluminium and alloy steel from 15 per centto 10 per cent will have a marginal positive impact. The rise in excise duty on steel, from 12 per

    cent to 16 per cent, will not have any impact, as it is modvatable. Overall, the impact of these measures

    will be neutral on the sector.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    23/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    19

    Industry Effect

    Overall sectoral impact

    Cars and utility vehicles Marginally positive

    The reduction in peak customs duty, from 20 per cent to 15 per cent, will lower the prices of imported

    components. This reduction will bring down the prices of premium segment cars, which have higher

    import content. The cut in the customs duty on aluminium, from 15 per cent to 10 per cent, will

    marginally decrease the cost of production for cars and utility vehicle manufacturers. These measures

    will increase the margins of players, as the savings in costs will be retained.

    The extension of 150 per cent deduction, in terms of in-house R&D expenses, upto March 31, 2007,

    will benefit companies such as M&M and Tata Motors.

    Cement Marginally positive

    The cement industry is set to benefit from the government's focus on irrigation, urban infrastructure

    and roads. The cut in the customs duty on pet coke will encourage the use of alternative fuels.

    Shree Cements and Gujarat Ambuja have a headstart in the use of alternative fuels and are set to

    benefit the most. Mini-cement plants will be affected more by the hike in the excise duty on clinker.

    However, the larger players (who purchase clinker) pay a higher excise duty on cement, and hence,

    will be able to offset the increase.

    The proposal to allow deduction of up to Rs 1 lakh on repayment of principal amount of housing

    loan will boost housing demand and thereby cement consumption.

    Chlor alkalies Marginally negative

    The cut in peak customs duty rates, from 20 per cent 15 per cent, will marginally affect the caustic

    soda and soda ash industry. Although the current domestic prices of both products are at a discount

    to the landed cost, prices are expected to fall marginally.

    As a large number of caustic soda manufacturers use captive power plants, which primarily use furnace

    oil as fuel, the cut in customs duty from 20 per cent to 10 per cent on FO/LSHS will lower their

    manufacturing costs marginally.

    Overall, the impact of the above measures is marginally negative for the industry.

    Cigarettes Neutral

    An additional excise duty has been imposed on cigarettes at specific rates ranging from Rs 15 to

    Rs 180 per thousand cigarettes. The increase is unlikely to affect cigarette companies, as they will

    be able to pass on the hike to consumers.

    Commercial vehicles Neutral

    The reduction in the excise duty on tyres will reduce the operating costs of transport operators in

    terms of lower tyre prices in the replacement market. The reduction in the peak duty on aluminium

    is likely to marginally reduce the input costs for commercial vehicle OEMs. The extension of 150 per

    cent tax deduction in in-house R&D expenses till March 2007 will benefit companies such as Eicher

    Motors, Tata Motors and Ashok Leyland.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    24/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    20

    Industry Effect

    Overall sectoral impact

    Consumer durables Positive

    The expected rise in the disposable income of consumers (following the change in tax brackets and

    norms) is expected to induce consumer durable demand.

    The reduction in the customs duty on CPTs is expected to lower input costs which is likely to have

    a marginally positive impact on CTVs (particularly the flat and large-sized CTV segments). Players

    are expected to pass on a part of the cost benefits to consumers. Mirc Electronics, LG and Samsung

    will benefit owing to increased demand. AC players are expected to pass on the reduction in excise

    benefits to consumers. This will result in higher demand, as ACs have displayed significant price

    elasticity in the past.

    The reduction in the customs duty on consumer durables will have a negligible impact on the domestic

    industry.

    Cotton and cotton yarn Positive

    The CENVAT exemption route has been maintained for natural fibres, including cotton, which is a

    positive for the industry. The customs duty on specific textile machinery has been cut from 20 per

    cent to 10 per cent; this will benefit the entire cotton textile sector. The de-reservation of 30 textile

    products, including hosiery, from among 108 items, will boost the cotton knitwear sector. The textile-

    processing sector will also benefit from the 10 per cent capital subsidy. The Rs 250 billion Technology

    Upgradation Fund (TUF) scheme has been continued with an additional allocation of Rs 4.35 billion,

    which will benefit the cotton yarn industry.

    Fertilisers Marginally positive

    Although the budget contained no direct provisions relating to the fertiliser industry, the increased

    thrust on irrigation, higher farm sector credit and various other measures for the agricultural sector

    augur well for the industry. The Budget has provided an allocation of Rs 162.5 billion as the fertiliser

    subsidy for 2005-06 as against the provision of Rs 126.62 billion for 2004-05. This increase is expected

    to cover the subsidy arrears for 2004-05.

    Hotels Neutral

    No impact on the sector.

    Information technology

    Software Neutra l

    The government has introduced the National Urban Renewal Mission, to renew the infrastructure of

    seven mega cities with a population of over 1 million. The deteriorating infrastructure in most Tier

    1 and Tier 2 cities has been a cause for concern for various players within the IT and ITeS industry.

    The above initiative is expected to benefit the IT sector in the long term.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    25/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    21

    Industry Effect

    Overall sectoral impact

    Information technology

    Hardware Marginally positive

    The reduction of customs duties on all Information Technology Agreement (ITA)-bound items to zero

    per cent from the current 10 per cent, as well as the abolition of customs duties on capital goods

    and inputs required to manufacture these items will benefit assemblers, domestic hardware manufacturers

    such as HCL Infosystems, Wipro, Zenith Computers, and players such as Dell, IBM and HP.

    This benefit is, however, partially offset by the imposition of a CVD of 4 per cent on all imports

    of ITA-bound items and their inputs, which attract zero duty. Credit for the CVD is available against payment of excise duty.

    Man-made fibres Marginally negative

    The reduction in excise duty on polyester filament yarn (PFY) from 24 per cent to 16 per cent will

    be positive for the industry, as it will help revive PFY demand, which had turned uncompetitive vis-

    -vis cotton yarn. There has been no rationalisation of excise duties on other man-made fibres.

    The cut in customs duties on POY and PSF will bring down the landed costs and force domestic

    producers to lower prices to match the landed costs. The overall negative impact on margins will,

    however, be offset to some extent, as the duties on the feedstocks, PTA, DMT and MEG, have also

    been brought down to 15 per cent. The duty cut on synthetic fabrics from 20 per cent to 15 percent will lead to increase in synthetic fabric imports. The overall impact will be marginally negative

    for the industry.

    Non-ferrous metals Marginally negative

    The budget measures will have a negative impact on the non-ferrous metal (NFM) industry as the

    import duties on aluminium, copper and zinc have fallen to 10 per cent from 15 per cent. However,

    in the case of copper and zinc, the impact on margins in 2005-06 will be neutralised by the favourable

    changes in global demand-supply dynamics. However, the margins of aluminium players are expected

    to decline by 300 basis points. Hindalco will be affected the most, with overall operating margins

    expected to decline by around 270 basis points. Nalco will be the least affected, because it has a

    high share of alumina sales in its product mix.

    Oil and gas Negative

    The customs duty cut in crude oil (from 10 per cent to 5 per cent) and peak customs duty cut

    on petroleum products (20 per cent to 10 per cent) has resulted in lower tariff protection for the

    refining players (from 3.1 per cent to 2.6 per cent). The resultant lower gross refining margins will

    result in oil marketing companies (oil marketing companies - OMCs, such as IOC, BPCL and HPCL)

    seeing their operating profits take a hit of Rs 6.6 billion. The decline in customs duty on products

    will have a positive impact on MS/HSD marketing margins (Rs 24 billion) and subsidy under-recovery

    on LPG/SKO (Rs 11.3 billion). The zero excise duty on LPG (down from 8 per cent) and SKO (down

    from 12 per cent) would result in lower subsidy under-recovery for the OMCs, to the extent of Rs

    17 billion. However, the increase in excise duty on MS and HSD would have a major negative impact

    on the marketing margins on these products, as these are not likely to be passed on to the end

    consumers. We estimate that the OMCs will take a collective hit of Rs 75 billion. Overall, the three

    major integrated OMCs are estimated to take an annual hit of Rs 29.4 billion while ONGC will see

    its operating profits take a hit of Rs 1.5 billion.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    26/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    22

    Industry Effect

    Overall sectoral impact

    Other infrastructure Positive

    The Union Budget 2005-06 lays significant thrust on the overall development of infrastructure. The

    Budget proposes to set up a special purpose vehicle (SPV) to the extent of Rs 100 billion, to fund

    roads, ports, airports and tourism projects, which will be governed by the inter-institutional group.

    In addition to this, foreign exchange reserves will be used to fund infrastructure projects. The government's

    continued commitment to provide equity (Rs 140.4 billion) and debt support (Rs 35.54 billion) to public

    sector enterprises in 6 infrastructure sectors, including railways and aviation, will benefit these sectors.

    The passage of the proposed bill for regulating SEZs could boost private investment and help in

    the speedy implementation of SEZ projects.

    Paints Marginally positive

    The reduction in peak import duty would improve operating margins by about 30 basis points.

    Paper Marginally negative

    The reduction in the import duty on paper, from 20 per cent to 15 per cent, will adversely affect

    higher-end coated paper manufacturer, BILT. Other paper manufacturers are likely to be marginally affected

    owing to the reduced differential between landed costs and domestic prices.

    Personal care and detergents Positive

    The reduction in peak import duty on raw materials will benefit the industry. The magnitude of theimpact would differ across players, depending on the extent of imports. The increase in disposable

    income, following change in the direct tax structure, will aid more penetration and upgradation to more

    value-added products.

    Petrochemicals: Basic and Polymers Negative

    The customs duty on naphtha has been retained at 5 per cent, while the duties on basic petrochemicals

    and polymers have been reduced to 5 per cent and 10 per cent, respectively. Thus, the effective

    duty protection (naphtha-polymer) for integrated polymer producers (RIL, IPCL, Haldia Petrochem and

    GAIL) has come down from 10 per cent to 5 per cent. For non-integrated producers (Finolex, Chemplast

    and DCW), though the duty differential is maintained, margins will be impacted negatively, as the

    reduction of the duty on raw materials will not completely offset the impact of the duty cut on higher-priced end products. Domestic producers will also face greater competition from cheaper imports. Further,

    the reduced duty differential between naphtha and basic products (not converted into polymers and

    sold domestically, such as benzene and toluene) will also affect player margins negatively. Overall,

    the duty cuts will have a negative impact on the industry.

    Petrochemicals: Downstream Marginally negative

    The government has cut customs duty from 20 per cent to 15 per cent on downstream petrochemical

    products. However, it has also reduced customs duty on raw material (benzene, ethylene, naphtha)

    from 10 per cent to 5 per cent. Although the duty differential is maintained at 10 per cent, the reduction

    in raw material duty will not completely offset the decline in duty on higher priced end products.

    It will thus have a marginally negative impact on downstream petrochemical companies like Thirumalai

    Chemicals (phthalic anhydride), Tamilnadu Petroproducts (LAB), HOCL and Schenectady Herdillia (phenol/

    acetone), PCBL (carbon black) and Vinyl Chemicals (VAM). Domestic producers will also face higher

    competition from imports. However, end user industries like paints, plasticisers, detergent and tyre

    manufacturers are expected to benefit with reduction in duties and hence, product prices.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    27/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    23

    Industry Effect

    Overall sectoral impact

    Pharmaceuticals Marginally positive

    The government has increased its focus on healthcare by increasing the allocation from Rs 84.2 billion

    to Rs 102.8 billion under the National Rural Health Mission. The focus is on increasing the supply

    of medicines and training medical personnel. The last date to avail of 150 per cent tax deductions

    for research companies as well as 100 per cent deduction of profits of companies carrying on scientific

    research and development and approved by the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research has

    been extended to March 31, 2007. Besides, the government has announced reduction in imports duty

    on a list of nine capital goods. It has announced formation of a corpus fund of Rs 5 billion called

    the SME Growth Fund through the Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) to provideequity support for small and medium units in pharmaceuticals and biotech firms. Thus the overall impact

    has been marginally positive.

    Ports Neutral

    The budget contains no specific measures for the ports sector. The establishment of a special purpose

    vehicle to finance infrastructure projects such as ports will, however, serve to boost investments in

    the sector. The imposition of service tax on dredging services will result in a marginal increase in

    capital and operating costs for ports.

    Power Marginally positive

    The government has indicated that in 2005-06 it will provide equity support to the tune of Rs 140.40 billion and loans amounting to Rs 35.54 billion to central public sector undertakings in select sectors,

    including power. This will help companies such as NTPC, NHPC and PGCIL in their capacity augmentation

    plans. The reduction of customs duties on capital goods would primarily benefit medium and small-

    scale power projects through lower project costs.

    The government has announced a budgetary support of Rs 11 billion for 2005-06 under the Rural

    Electrification Distribution Backbone programme for installing at least one 33/11KV substation in every

    block, for electrification of 1,25,000 villages in the next 5 years. This is a positive indicator of the

    government's overall commitment to reform the sector.

    The cess of Rs 1.5 per litre on light diesel oil would increase generation costs by around 8 per

    cent for captive power plants that consume the same.

    Roads Positive

    The Union Budget 2005-06 has provided a significant fillip to the roads sector, given its higher focus

    on the infrastructure sector. The rise in allocations for the National Highway Development Programme

    (NHDP) from Rs 65.14 billion in FY05 to Rs 93.20 billion in FY06 will result in more funds for the

    programme. The focus on NHDP phase III will result in speedy implementation of the project.

    An outlay of Rs 55 billion under the National Urban Renewal Mission, a special purpose vehicle (SPV)

    to finance infrastructure projects with Rs 100 billion borrowing limit and a provision of Rs 15 billion

    for viability gap funding for infrastructure projects, will boost the roads sector.

    Shipping Neutral

    No impact on the sector.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    28/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    24

    Industry Effect

    Overall sectoral impact

    Steel Marginally negative

    The excise duty on steel products has been increased to 16 per cent from 12 per cent. The excise

    duty on steel is cenvatable for a majority of the steel consumers of flat products and will, hence,

    will be passed on. Thus the impact on margins will be neutral.

    However, the increase will be difficult to pass on in case of GP/GC steel and long products. SAIL,

    Tata Steel (for long products) and GP/GC manufacturers will be partially affected; the least impact

    will be on JISCO.

    Lower duties on stainless steel will have a neutral impact because the landed cost (after the duty

    reduction) is higher than the current domestic prices.

    One factor that will mitigate the negative impact is the reduction in the duties on coking coal (with

    more than 12 per cent ash content), refractories and ferro alloys, which will marginally lower the input

    costs for the industry.

    Sugar Positive

    The proposed financial package for the revitalisation of the sugar industry, entailing a moratorium

    of 2 years on the payment of both principal and interest, is expected to largely benefit those mills

    in Maharashtra and South India, that are in financial distress. For the stronger mills, which have availed

    of loans from the Sugar Development Fund (SDF), the reduction in the rate of interest on all outstanding

    SDF loans is viewed as a positive. The reduction in the basic customs duty on molasses and industrial

    alcohol from 15 per cent to 10 per cent is expected to be marginally negative for the industry.

    Tea and Coffee Positive

    The removal of surcharge of Re 1 per kg of tea will benefit the industry. The proposal to reframe

    the price stabilisation fund and improve replantation and rejuvenation activity will benefit the industry

    in the long term.

    Telecom cables Negative

    The abolition of the basic customs duty on jelly-filled telecom cables (15 per cent in 2004-05) and

    optical fibre cables (20 per cent in 2004-05) under the Information Technology Agreement (ITA) is

    a negative for the industry. Price realisations will decline, as competitive pressures will force Indian

    producers to lower prices to compete with cheaper imports. The reduction in the customs duty on

    raw materials like copper and optic fibre partly offsets the zero duty on finished products.

    The pressure on the margins of domestic producers is expected to increase.

    Telecom equipment Marginally negative

    The customs duty on specified finished products and the capital goods required to manufacture these

    products have been abolished; earlier a customs duty of 10-15 per cent was levied on these items.

    The change in the customs duty on finished products will have a negative impact on domestic players,

    although the abolition of duties on capital goods will mitigate the negative impact.

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    29/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    25

    Telecom services Negative

    The continuation of the exemption presently available to telecom service providers for the import of

    specified telecom network equipment and parts thereof is a positive for the sector. Zero import duty

    on mobile and fixed wireless handsets to lower entry cost for customers.

    The benefits under section 80 IA, wherein a telecom operator was entitled to 100 per cent exemption

    on taxable profit for 5 years and 30 per cent exemption for the next 5 years during the initial 15

    years from the date of commencement of commercial operations, have not been extended. This will

    reduce the return on future capital investments in the industry.

    Tractors Marginally positive

    The overall thrust of the government on the agricultural sector, in terms of irrigation, agricultural

    credit, crop insurance and schemes for the agri-marketing sector, augurs well for the long-term demand

    growth in the industry.

    The increase in the excise duty on steel from 12 per cent to 16 per cent is likely to be passed

    on by the tractor manufacturers as the excise duty on inputs is not cenvatable for tractors (since

    the agricultural tractors are exempt from excise duty).

    The imposition of a 16 per cent excise duty on road tractors (of engine capacity more than 1,800

    cc) for road trailers is not expected to impact the industry, considering its miniscule volumes when

    compared with agricultural tractors.

    Two-wheelers Marginally positive

    The reduction in personal tax rates will increase household disposable income, which is a positive

    for two-wheeler demand.

    Tyres Positive

    Customs on tyres and its raw materials - synthetic butadiene rubber, poly butadiene rubber and carbon

    black - has been reduced from 20 per cent to 15 per cent. The domestic prices of raw materials

    are aligned with landed costs, thus reducing the material costs. So the operating margins may improve

    from 7.5 per cent to 10 per cent. The customs duty cut on tyres will not intensify the import threat

    from China and South Korea, as they already enjoyed a preferential 15 per cent duty under the Bangkok

    Agreement. The abolition of the specific excise duty of 8 per cent on tyres would have a neutral

    impact, as the benefits are expected to be passed on.

    Industry Effect

    Overall sectoral impact

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    30/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    26

    Overall company impact

    Continued...

    Company Impact Industry

    ABB Ltd. Capital goods

    ACC Ltd. Cement

    Aksh Optifibre Ltd. Telecom cables

    Alfa Laval (India) Ltd. Capital goods

    Andhra Pradesh Paper Mills Ltd. Paper

    Apollo Tyres Ltd. Tyres

    Arvind Mills Ltd. Cotton textiles

    Ashok Leyland Ltd. Commercial vehicles

    Asian Hotels Ltd. Hotels

    Asian Paints India Ltd. Paints

    Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. Pharmaceuticals

    Bajaj Auto Ltd. Two wheelers

    Bajaj Hindusthan Ltd. Sugar

    Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Paper

    Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd. Sugar

    Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Sugar

    Berger Paints India Ltd. Paints

    Bharat Forge Ltd. Auto ancillaries

    Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Capital goods

    Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Oil and gas

    Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Telecom services

    Bharti Televentures Ltd. Telecom services

    Bhushan Steel & Strips Ltd. Steel

    Biocon India Ltd. PharmaceuticalsBirla Ericsson Optical Ltd. Telecom cables

    Bombay Dyeing Ltd. Diversified

    Bongaigon Petrochemicals Ltd. Oil and gas

    Carrier Aircon Ltd. Consumer durables

    Ceat Ltd. Tyres

    Century Enka Ltd. Man-made fibres

    Century Textiles Ltd. Diversified

    Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals Ltd. Fertilisers

    Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. Petrochemicals: Basic and Polymers

    Chennai Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Oil and gas

    Cipla Ltd. Pharmaceuticals

    Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd. Personal care and Detergents

    Coromandel Fertilizers Ltd. Fertilisers

    Crompton Greaves Ltd. Capital goods

    Dabur India Ltd. Personal care and Detergents

    DCW Ltd. Petrochemicals: Basic and Polymers

    D-Link(India) Ltd. Information technology

    Dr Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. Pharmaceuticals

    Eicher Motors Ltd. Commercial vehicles, Tractors

    EID Parry Ltd. Sugar

    EIH Ltd. Hotels

    Escorts Ltd. Tractors

    Essar Shipping Ltd. Shipping

    Essar Steel Ltd. Steel

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    31/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    27

    Overall company impact...continued

    continued...

    Company Impact Industry

    Finolex Cables Ltd. Telecom cables

    Finolex Industries Ltd. Petrochemicals: Basic and Polymers

    Garden Silk Mills Ltd. Man-made fibres

    Gas Authority of India Ltd. Oil and gas

    George Williamson (Assam) Ltd. Tea and Coffee

    GlaxoSmithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Pharmaceuticals

    Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. Cigarettes

    Goetze India Ltd. Auto ancillaries

    Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. Paints

    Goodricke Group Ltd. Tea and CoffeeGoodyear India Ltd. Tyres

    Grasim Industries Ltd. Diversified

    Great Eastern Shipping Co Ltd. Shipping

    GTN Textile Ltd. Cotton textiles

    Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. Chlor alkalies

    Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. Cement

    Gujarat Heavy Chemicals Ltd. Chlor alkalies

    Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Company Ltd. Fertilisers

    Gujarat State Fertilisers C ompany Ltd. Fertilisers

    Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. Petrochemicals: Basic and Polymers

    Harrisons Malayalam Ltd. Tea and Coffee

    HCL Infosystems Ltd. Information technology

    Hero Honda Motors Ltd. Two wheelers

    Himachel Futuristic Communications Ltd. Telecom equipment

    Hindalco Industries Ltd. Non-ferrous metals

    Hindustan Copper Ltd. Non-ferrous metals

    Hindustan Lever Ltd. Personal care and Detergents

    Hindustan Motors Ltd. Cars and Utility vehicles

    Hindustan Organic Chemicals Ltd. Petrochemicals: Downstream

    Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Oil and gas

    Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Non-ferrous metals

    Hitachi Home & Life Solutions (India) Ltd. Consumer durables

    Honda SIEL Cars India Ltd. Cars and Utility vehicles

    Hotel Leelaventure Ltd. Hotels

    Hutchison Max Telecom Ltd. Telecom servicesHyundai Motors India Ltd. Cars and Utility vehicles

    IBP Co. Ltd. Oil and gas

    ICI India Ltd. Paints

    India Cement Ltd. Cement

    India Glycols Ltd. Petrochemicals: Downstream

    Indian Hotels Company Ltd. Hotels

    Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. Oil and gas

    Indian Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd. Petrochemicals: Basic and Polymers

    Indian Rayon & Industries Ltd. Diversified

    Indo Gulf Fertilisers Ltd. Fertilisers

    Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Ltd. Man-made fibres

    Infosys Technologies Ltd.

    Information technologyIspat Industries Ltd. Steel

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    32/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    28

    Overall company impact...continued

    continued...

    Company Impact Industry

    ITC Ltd. Cigarettes

    ITI Ltd. Telecom equipment

    JBF Industries Ltd. Man-made fibres

    Jindal Stainless Ltd. Steel

    JISCO/JVSL Steel

    JK Industries Ltd. Tyres

    Kalyani Brakes Ltd. Auto ancillaries

    Kesoram Industries Ltd. Diversified

    Kochi Refineries Ltd. Oil and gas

    Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd. Capital goodsMadras Cements Ltd. Cement

    Madras Refineries Ltd. Oil and gas

    Mahavir Spinning Mills Ltd. Cotton textiles

    Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Cars and Utility vehicles, Tractors

    Malwa Cotton Spinning Mills Ltd. Cotton textiles

    Maruti Udyog Ltd. Cars and Utility vehicles

    Matrix Laboratories Ltd. Pharmaceuticals

    Mercator Lines Ltd. Shipping

    Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Telecom services

    MIRC Electronics Ltd. Consumer durables

    Moser Baer India Ltd. Information technology

    Motor Industries Co. Ltd. Auto ancillaries

    MRF Ltd. Tyres

    Munjal Showa Ltd. Auto ancillaries

    Nahar Exports Ltd. Cotton textiles

    National Aluminium Co. Ltd. Non-ferrous metals

    National Hydro Electric Power Corp. Ltd. Power

    National Thermal Power Corp. Ltd. Power

    Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. Pharmaceuticals

    Nirma Ltd. Personal care and Detergents

    Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. Oil and gas

    Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. Oil and gas

    Oswal Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd. Fertilisers

    PCS Technologies Ltd. Information technology

    Pfizer Ltd. PharmaceuticalsPhilips Carbon Black Ltd. Petrochemicals: Downstream

    Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Power

    Pudumjee pulp and paper Ltd. Paper

    Punjab Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. Chlor alkalies

    Punjab Tractors Ltd. Tractors

    Ranbaxy Ltd. Pharmaceuticals

    Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd. Fertilisers

    Raymond Ltd. Diversified

    Reliance Energy Ltd. Power

    Reliance Industries Ltd. Diversified

    Reliance Infocomm Ltd. Telecom services

    Sanghi Polyester Ltd.

    Man-made fibresSatyam Computer Services Ltd. Information technology

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    33/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    29

    Overall company impact...continued

    Company Impact Industry

    Schenectady Herdillia Ltd. Petrochemicals: Downstream

    Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. Paper

    Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. Shipping

    Shree Cements Ltd. Cement

    Shyam Telecom Ltd. Telecom equipment

    Sona Koyo Steering Systems Ltd. Auto ancillaries

    Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporation Ltd. Fertilisers

    Steel Authority of India Ltd. Steel

    Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Non-ferrous metals

    Sterlite Optical Technologies Ltd. Telecom cablesSundaram Fasteners Ltd. Auto ancillaries

    Supreme Petrochem Ltd. Petrochemicals: Basic and Polymers

    TAFE Ltd. Tractors

    Tamil Nadu Newsprint & Papers Ltd. Paper

    Tamil Nadu Petroproducts Ltd. Petrochemicals: Downstream

    Tata Chemicals Ltd. Diversified

    Tata Coffee Ltd. Tea and Coffee

    Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. Steel

    Tata Motors Ltd. Cars and UVs, Commercial vehicles

    Tata Power Company Ltd. Power

    Tata Tea Ltd. Tea and Coffee

    Tata Teleservices Ltd.

    Telecom servicesThirumalai Chemicals Ltd. Petrochemicals: Downstream

    TVS Motor Company Ltd. Two wheelers

    Ultratech Cement Ltd. Cement

    Videocon Appliances Ltd. Consumer durables

    Videocon International Ltd. Consumer durables

    Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Telecom services

    Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. Telecom cables

    Vintron Informatics Ltd. Information technology

    VST Industries Ltd. Cigarettes

    West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. Paper

    Whirlpool of India Ltd. Consumer durables

    Wipro Ltd. Information technology

    Wockhardt Ltd. Pharmaceuticals

    Zenith Computers Ltd. Information technology

    Zuari Industries Ltd. Fertilisers

    Source: CRIS INFAC

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    34/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    30

    Auto ancillariesDomestic growth to slow down, surge in exports to continue in 2005-06

    The auto ancillary industry is estimated to have grown by around 20 per cent in the first 9 months of 2004-05

    in terms of value of production as compared with the same period last year. The growth was led by the strong

    domestic growth posted by almost all the segments of the automobile industry and high growth in exports.

    The passenger cars and utility vehicles segment grew by 27 per cent, commercial vehicles by 30 per cent, two-

    wheelers by 14 per cent and tractors by 40 per cent in the first 9 months of 2004-05. For the full year of 2004-

    05, the auto ancillary industry is expected to grow by 18-20 per cent, while exports are seen growing by 25-30

    per cent.

    In 2005-06, the auto ancillary industry is likely to post a relatively lower growth of 12-13 per cent. The lowergrowth will be due to the reduced growth rate in almost all the automobile segments. However, exports are

    expected to continue the strong growth momentum in 2005-06 at 20-25 per cent. This will be led by the

    continued thrust on exports by domestic manufacturers as well as increase in outsourcing of components

    from India by global OEMs and Tier-I vendors.

    Operating profit margins slipped marginally in the first 9 months of 2004-05, owing to a rise in input costs; the

    margins are expected to remain under marginal pressure in 2005-06 as well, as CRIS INFAC expects average

    steel prices to remain firm in 2005-06. But net profits of players have risen, on account of higher growth in net

    sales and lower capital charges in the first 9 months of 2004-05; the net profits are expected to improve further

    in 2005-06.

    Auto ancillaries: Tariffs

    (per cent) Customs Excise

    2004-05 2005-06 2004-05 2005-06

    Parts of four-wheelers 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    Parts of two-wheelers 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    Parts of IC engines 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    IC engines 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    Transmission shafts, gears and gear boxes 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    Auto gaskets/brake linings 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    Catalytic convertors 5.1 5.1 16.3 16.3GP/GC steel 5.1 5.1 12.2 16.3

    HR steel 5.1 5.1 12.2 16.3

    Aluminium 15.3 10.2 16.3 16.3

    Copper 15.3 10.2 16.3 16.3

    Lead 15.3 5.1 16.3 16.3

    Nickel 5.1 5.1 16.3 16.3

    HR: Hot rolled; GC: Galvanised coil; GP: Galvanised plate; IC: Internal combustion

    Source: CRIS INFAC

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    35/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    31

    Auto ancillariesBudget measures marginally positive for the auto ancillary sector

    Impact factors

    A. The reduction in the peak customs duty on components will benefit companies that import sub-components

    for manufacturing their final product, such as MICO and Sona Koyo Steering Systems.

    B. The reduction in the peak customs duty on aluminium will marginally reduce the input costs of auto ancillaries

    in terms of lower prices. The cut in the peak customs duty on copper will marginally reduce the input costs of

    companies manufacturing electrical components such as wire harnesses. The reduction in the customs dutyon lead to 5 per cent will reduce the input costs of automotive battery manufacturing companies such as Exide

    and Amara Raja Batteries. The benefit of the above measures will be passed on to the original equipment

    manufacturers.

    C. The increase in the excise duty on steel will not have any impact on the costs of auto ancillary manufacturers,

    as the same is modvatable.

    D. The extension of the 150 per cent tax benefit for in-house R&D will marginally benefit auto ancillary companies

    undertaking research and development.

    Company Impact Impact factors

    Bharat Forge Ltd. D

    Goetze India Ltd. B, D

    Kalyani Brakes Ltd. B, D

    Motor Industries Co. Ltd. A, D

    Munjal Showa Ltd. A

    Sona Koyo Steering Systems Ltd A, D

    Sundaram Fasteners Ltd. A

    Source: CRIS INFAC

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    36/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    32

    Capital goodsDemand to remain robust in medium term

    The demand growth momentum in capital goods is expected to continue in 2005-06, driven by pick-up in

    industrial activity, fresh investments in sectors like power equipment, metals, oil and gas and petrochemicals

    and the continued spending thrust on infrastructure. Over the past 2 years, the demand for capital goods has

    risen due to a rise in corporate profitability, leading to greater investment activity in the industry.

    Unlike the negative growth rates seen in 2001-02, the sector grew by over 13 per cent in 2003-04 and 14 per cent

    in 2004-05, driving industrial growth. The Index of Industrial Production (IIP) averaged 2.7 per cent in 2001-02,

    6.9 per cent in 2003-04 and 8.1 per cent in the first half of 2004-05.

    This is evident in the bulging order book for companies catering to these sectors. The players' export thrust,

    to weather the downturn in domestic markets, has continued and the contribution of export revenues has been

    steadily improving. We expect this trend to continue in the medium term. There are substantial capex plans

    outlined by major players (ABB, Seimens, BHEL), due to the need to expand capacities to meet these orders

    (the asset turnover ratios reflect higher capacity utilisation levels).

    Competition in this sector is expected to intensify since the reduction, in January 2004, of peak customs duty

    to 20 per cent, which has made imports cheaper. Capital goods imports grew by 31 per cent in 2003-04 vis--vis

    24.7 per cent in 2002-03.

    The profitability of domestic manufacturers has improved over the past 2 years after having hit a low in 2001-

    02. We expect margins to be marginally affected in 2004-05 before stabilising in 2005-06 in spite of the improved

    demand outlook on account of the increased competition from imports and rise in the prices of raw materials,

    namely steel, aluminium and copper

    Capital goods: Tariffs

    (per cent) Excise

    2004-05 2005-06 2004-05 2005-06

    General machinery 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    Textile machinery 20.4 10.2 16.3 16.3

    Textile machinery (Specified items) 5.1 5.1 16.3 16.3

    Machine tools 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    CNC systems 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    Milking and dairy machinery 20.4 15.3 0.0 0.0High speed steel/alloy steel 15.3 10.2 12.2 16.3

    Steel plates 5.1 5.1 12.2 16.3

    Seamless steel tubes 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    Project imports

    Fertilisers 5.1 + 10 CVD 5.1 + 10 CVD - -

    Refining of crude petroleum 5.1 + 10 CVD 5.1 + 10 CVD - -

    Coal mining 5.1 + 10 CVD 5.1 + 10 CVD - -

    Captive power plants of 5 MW and above 20.4 + 16 CVD 15.3 + 16 CVD - -

    Power generation project 5.1 + 10 CVD 5.1 + 10 CVD - -

    (excluding captive power plants)

    Power transmission projects of 66 KV and above 5.1 + 10 CVD 5.1 + 10 CVD - -

    LNG regassification plants 5.1 + 10 CVD 5.1 + 10 CVD - -Other industrial plants or projects, including oil and gas 20.4 + 16 CVD 15.3 + 16 CVD - -

    CVD: Countervailing duty

    Note

    1) Custom duty on steel plates revised from 10 to 5 per cent in August 2004

    Source: CRIS INFAC

    Customs

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    37/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    33

    Capital goods

    Impact factors

    A. The reduction in the peak customs duty from 20 per cent to 15 per cent will result in increased competition

    from imports. This will have a marginally negative impact on domestic companies; but domestic companies

    with strong technology platforms and relationships will be able to weather increased competition to an extent.

    The reduction in the customs duty on specified textile machinery from 20 per cent to 10 per cent will have a

    negative impact on domestic textile machinery manufacturers.

    B. The reduction in customs duty from 15 per cent to 10 per cent on alloy steel, aluminium and copper will have

    a marginally positive impact on raw material prices.

    C. Increase in excise duty on iron and steel from 12 per cent to 16 per cent will not have any impact, as it will be

    modvatable.

    D. The budgetary allocation of Rs 11 billion for rural electrification programmes will benefit transformer

    manufacturers; however, with an expected lag in implementation, we do not expect immediate benefits.

    Customs duties cut on product and raw materials

    Company Impact Impact factors

    ABB Ltd. A,B,C,D

    Alfa Laval (India) Ltd. A,B,C

    Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. A,B,C,D

    Crompton Greaves Ltd. A,B,C,D

    Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd. A,B,C

    Source: CRIS INFAC

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    38/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    34

    Cars and utility vehiclesGrowth to be lower in 2005-06

    Domestic passenger car sales rose by 22 per cent, while domestic utility vehicle (UV) sales increased by 20 per

    cent in the first 9 months of 2004-05. Passenger cars and UVs are expected to grow at 17-18 per cent and 16-17

    per cent respectively in 2004-05. The strong growth in sales was due to strong growth in family incomes,

    higher aspiration levels of customers, price reductions and new models/variants launched by companies,

    lower EMIs due to stable interest rates and higher tenures. The cut in EMIs also spurred tour operators to

    replace old vehicles in their fleet.

    The growth of passenger cars is likely to be lower at 10-11 per cent in 2005-06, due to increase in prices of cars

    (owing to rise in input price), Euro III norms, and stable interest rates. The mid-size segment and compactsegment will continue to see growth, while the mini segment may see a fall in sales. Similarly, the growth in

    utility vehicles is likely to be lower, at 4-5 per cent, mainly due to expectations of stable consumer finance

    interest rates, which drove growth in the previous fiscal.

    The operating margins of car and UV manufacturers have improved marginally, owing to strong demand

    growth and higher capacity utilisation. Going forward, the operating margins are expected to increase slightly

    in 2005-06, on the back of higher realisations, due to change in product mix in favour of compact and mid-size

    segment cars. Net profits have grown substantially in the first 9 months of 2004-05, on account of higher

    volumes and lower interest cost, and are expected to improve further in 2005-06.

    Cars and utility vehicles: Tariffs

    (per cent)

    2004-05 2005-06 2004-05 2005-06

    New cars

    -CKDs 20.4 15.3 24.5 24.5

    -SKDs 61.2 61.2 24.5 24.5

    -CBUs 61.2 61.2 24.5 24.5

    Second hand cars 107.1 102.0 24.5 24.5

    Utility vehicles

    -6-12 seater1 20.4 15.3 24.5 24.5

    -12 seater and above1 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    Steel items 5.1 5.1 12.2 16.3

    Engines and engine parts 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    Other components 20.4 15.3 16.3 16.3

    CKDs: Completely knocked down units; SKDs: Semi-knocked down units;

    CBUs: Completely built units1 Excluding driver

    Source: CRIS INFAC

    Customs Excise

  • 8/3/2019 Budget 0506

    39/124

    CRIS INFAC ANALYSIS, FEBRUARY 28, 2005

    U

    N

    I

    O

    N

    B

    U

    D

    G

    E

    T

    35

    Cars and Utility vehicles

    Impact factors

    A. The cut in the import duty on used cars and utility vehicles from 105 per cent to 100 per cent will not have any

    impact on the industry.

    B. The reduction in the peak customs duty on components from 20 per cent to 15 per cent will lower the prices of

    imported components. This reduction will bring down the prices of premium segment cars, which have a

    higher import content. In addition, the cut in the customs duty on aluminium from 15 per cent to 10 per cent

    will marginally lower the cost of production of cars and utility vehicles. The above measures will have a

    positive impact on cars and utility vehicle manufacturers, as these benefits are likely to be retained by auto

    original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), thereby increasing their margins.

    C. The increase in the excise duty on steel from 12 per cent to 16 per cent and cut in the excise duty on tyres from

    24 per cent to 16 per cent will not affect OEMs, as the excise on inputs are modvatable against the excise paid

    by companies on their final product.

    D. The extension of 150 per cent deduction up to March 31, 2007 in terms of in-house R&D expenditure will

    benefit automobile OEMs.

    E. The reduction in personal tax rates will increase household disposable income, which is a positive for car

    demand.

    Cost savings for cars & UV manufacturers to improve margins

    Company Impact Impact factors

    Hindustan Motors Ltd. B, D, E

    Honda SIEL Cars India Ltd. B, D, E

    Hyundai Motors India Ltd. B, D, E

    Maruti Udyog Ltd. B, D, E

    Tata Motors Ltd. B, D,