BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World...

16
BusRT – BRT Modeling software September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF Montassar DRAIEF - - SYSTRA SYSTRA

Transcript of BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World...

Page 1: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRTBRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT

Montassar DRAIEF Montassar DRAIEF -- SYSTRASYSTRA

Page 2: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

Content

– Identification of 2 types of BRT

– BRT cases : success, limits and future• CURITIBA• BOGOTA

– BRT Limits of capacity• Modeling - Theoretical example• Comparison BRT / MRT

– Conclusion

Page 3: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

High capacity BRT

– Success of BOGOTA and CURITIBA – High capacity similar to MRT

• Large right of way : 2x2 or 2x1 lanes• Hierarchy of PT network (BRT + feeders)• High quality of service• Different services (Express, Direct, Normal) • Modern buses• Adapted stations (ticketing on stations)• 2 to 3 modules per station• ITS

2 TYPES OF BRT

Page 4: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

2 TYPES OF BRTUrban BRT (2*1 lane)

– Huge success in Europe and mainly in FRANCE (Bus à Haut Niveau de Service)

– Transformation of normal bus lines into BRT (segregated right of way)

– Capacity similar to LRT and Tramways– Focus on the urban integration– Improving the quality of service (speed, regularity)– Modern Busway (guidance, ITS…)

Page 5: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

CURITIBAComplete Network using only buses

Different types of corridors:- Express corridors 72km- Feeders 270 km- Inter-district corridors 185km- Normal bus lines 573km

Different types of services- Bi-articulated 20km/h- Direct 30km/h- Conventional: 18km/h

Express corridorsInter-districtFeeders

Urban transfer terminal

Metropolitan transfer terminalEarly stage of planning

High capacities with Buses (270 p/bus)

Cost effectiveness (3 million US$/km)

Page 6: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

SourceTransmilenio SA

Traffic patterns - CURITIBA

NORTH 23 v/h

WEST 14 v/h

BOQUEIRÃO 41 v/h

EAST 35 v/h

SOUTH 67 v/h

LINHA DIRETA

TRAFFIC PATTERNS

LEGENDBIARTICULADO

Page 7: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

Sypply PT - Demand PT

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000

1800000

2000000

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Years

Pass

enge

rs /

day

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

PT S

uppl

y

Passengers per dayPT supply in km

Traffic patterns - CURITIBA

Page 8: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

Transmilenio

38 000 ppdpharound 240 bus pdph

(Main section)

SourceTransmilenio SA

BOGOTA

Page 9: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

– Identification of the saturation level – Main section• Commercial speed• Journey time

– Identification of the saturation level – 160 p/bus• Commercial speed• Journey time

40000 ppdph– Identification of the saturation level – 160 p/bus

• Commercial speed• Journey time

Modeling - BOGOTA

Commercial speed / Capacity

Com

mer

cial

spe

ed (k

m/h

)

Capacity (ppdph)16000 32000 48000 64000

Average speedOmnibus speedExpress speed

Journey duration / Capacity

Jour

ney

dura

tion

(in s

)

Capacity (ppdph)16000 32000 48000 64000

Average journey duration

Express journey duration

Omnibus journey duration

48000 ppdph

Page 10: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

Future projects - BOGOTA

Page 11: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

BRT modeling - Limits of capacity

2 lanes everywhere

2 lanes in station

1 lane everywhere

Page 12: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

Commercial speed (km/h)

05

1015202530354045

75 90 105

120

135

150

170

185

200

220

235

255

270

295

310

330

355

375 Flow (buspdph)

1 lane2 lanes only in stations2 lanes

1 lane everywhere : 150 buspdph 15000 ppdph 24000 ppdph

2 lanes in station : 300 buspdph 30000 ppdph 48000 ppdph

2 lanes everywhere : 300 buspdph 30000 ppdph 48000 ppdph

1 lane everywhere : 150 buspdph 15000 ppdph 24000 ppdph

2 lanes in station : 300 buspdph 30000 ppdph 48000 ppdph

2 lanes everywhere : 300 buspdph 30000 ppdph 48000 ppdph

BRT - Limits of capacity~2 km/h

100 p/bus 160 p/bus

MRT

Capacity (ppdph)

Page 13: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

BRT / MRT

Page 14: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

Operation costs including depreciation ($/seat.km)

0

0,01

0,02

0,03

0,04

0,05

0,06

0,07

0,08

0,09

0,1

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000Capacity pphpd

BRT in Developed countries

MRT/LRT in Developed countries

BRT in Developing countries

MRT/LRT in Developing countries

BRT / MRT

Page 15: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

BRT / MRT

LowHighFlexibilityEasyDifficultNetwork imp.

Easy if undergroundDifficultUrban integrationDifficultEasyImplementationLow occupancyHigh occupancyLand use> 40 M$/km3 to 14 M$/kmInvestments costsGoodLowRegularityUp to 70000 ppdph< 40000 ppdphCapacity> 30 km/h20 to 30 km/hCommercial speed

MRTBRT

Page 16: BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT - World Banksiteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291... · September 2006 BRT PERFORMANCES vs. MRT Montassar DRAIEF - SYSTRA. ... 1970 1975

BusRT – BRT Modeling softwareSeptember 2006

– BRT relevance in developing countries:• 10000 ppdph single track• 20000 to 30000 ppdph double track

– Mode relevance: Diagnosis & planning• Significant number of criteria• Uniqueness of each city

– BRT Evolution: Long term planning• Metro project (CURITIBA)• BRT Network (BOGOTA)

Conclusion