Brooklyn Eagle 1891, 1864, 1894 v. Barack Obama

8/9/2019 Brooklyn Eagle 1891, 1864, 1894 v. Barack Obama

1/15

Brooklyn Eagle Dec 20, 1891; Page: 17

The writer above implies that a condition of naturalization or intent of

permanence by immigration to the USA upon the parents of the child applies as

to whether we will call a child born on US soil simply a citizen by Law, or a natural

born citizen by both Law and Birth. In the late 1800s, the use of the phrase

foreign born was often used dually to imply immigrants who had naturalized to

the United States with the right to votehence, by Law were US Citizens.


2/15


3/15


4/15


5/15


6/15


7/15


8/15

The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, November 16, 1864, Page 2, Column 1


9/15

Understood in the context of this period of US History, and how that the

Eagle called those naturalizing from other countries, but having naturalized

and joined the body politic of the United States legally, regularly calling

them as foreigners alsoby understanding this double usage of the day,

we can then understand the abbreviated passages by the Eagle in thecontext by which those at the Eagle had presented that context to its

readers. All in all, the Eagle was a snapshot in time as to the attitudes and

understandings (including opinions) of the Constitution and US Law in its

day. Thus, as the December 20, 1891 article states, so it is understood,

that if a foreign father begets a child here in the United States, and has no

intention of staying, and is only visiting as either a tourist or as a transient

alien such as being a studentthen the child is NOT a United States

natural born citizen, but merely a citizen of multi-national legiences

which happened to include the United States as one of those legiences.

The natural born status places the emphasis on birth to parents, with the

Law of the Nations focusing on the seed of that which was plantedlike a

breadfruit tree seedling not native to the US or Mexico being planted there

by a merchant sailor recently from Tahiti, or such a locale. It is only when

the tree reproduces in the soil, that it becomes native. If the seed is the

father, and the soil is the mother (allegorically), then only when the seedling

grows and reproduces in the new country will those breadfruit trees become

natural born by adjoining itself to a new native soil in the same way that

an immigrating citizen father joins a body politic and makes his child a sonof the soil of the new country. Since Barack Obamas father never joined

the body politic of the United States as a citizen, never voted in our election,

was not subject to our income taxes, nor swore legience to the United

States, it was if he had never been planted here, but merely passed

through with the same unattachment as a shipped good or commodity

passing through. That good or commodity would not thus be stated to have

originated in the USA, but merely passed through much like a tourist.

Then, in the case of Barack, that as long as his mother was married to a

foreigner, instead of being single when she had him, there was a temporary

(albeit retrievable) transference of her citizenship to the State or Nation of

her new husband. Thus, even if she divorced, her children are ensured the

nationality of the father as pre-eminent over that of the mother (cf. Montana

v. Kennedy, 1961).


10/15


11/15


12/15


13/15


14/15


15/15

Again, the child follows the legiences of the father for his natural born

status. Barack Hussein Obama I never naturalized to the US, but retained

his Kenyan and British Commonwealth citizen status.

And even if though born in the legience of another nation than that

of his father, the child of Barack Hussein Obama I (in the person of

Barack Hussein Obama II) does NOT become a natural born citizen is

a nation alien to the citizenship of his fatherhe merely becomes a

dual citizen, whose citizenship is inclusive of that foreign birth.

Hence, Barack Obama is Constitutionally unqualified and

Constitutionally unfit for the Presidency of the United States of

America. - - Brianroy

Brooklyn Eagle 1891, 1864, 1894 v. Barack Obama

Documents

Transcript of Brooklyn Eagle 1891, 1864, 1894 v. Barack Obama