British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

73
I DRILLING REPORT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HEN INGRAM LAKE PROPERTY (Hen 1-4 claims, 80 units Record numbers 301509-301512 Cariboo Mining District British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS DATE RECEIVED I OCT 0 3 I995 Lat. 52" 28'54"N, Long. 121"01'38"W for DOUBLE CREEK MINING COW. Ste 1401 - 675 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B C , V6B 1N2 Tel 681-5720, Fax. 681-6937 VANCOUVER B C CANADA @ Tel(604) - 681-7976 Fax (604) - 681-7993 pJ s wr WO s- dcb - 2. i- 13- a@ m s B.J.PRICE GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS INC. ** 1 ' SUB-RECORDER i 1 RECEIVED ' I I SEP 2 7 1095 BY Bany J Price, M Sc , P Geo M.R. +# .... _-..____ $ ............... j VANCOUVER, B.C. Ste 716 - 850 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B C , Tel 604-682-4488 Fax 604-682-8728 1 1 1 I September 15,1995.

Transcript of British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

Page 1: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I DRILLING REPORT

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

HEN INGRAM LAKE PROPERTY (Hen 1-4 claims, 80 units

Record numbers 301509-301512 Cariboo Mining District

British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS

DATE RECEIVED I OCT 0 3 I995 Lat. 52" 28'54"N, Long. 121"01'38"W

for

DOUBLE CREEK MINING COW.

Ste 1401 - 675 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B C , V6B 1N2

Tel 681-5720, Fax. 681-6937 VANCOUVER B C CANADA @

Tel(604) - 681-7976 Fax (604) - 681-7993 pJ s w r W O

s - d c b

- 2. i- 13- a@ m s

B.J.PRICE GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS INC. **

1 ' SUB-RECORDER i 1 RECEIVED

' I I SEP 2 7 1095

BY

Bany J Price, M Sc , P Geo

M.R. +# ...._-..____ $............... j VANCOUVER, B.C.

Ste 716 - 850 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B C ,

Tel 604-682-4488 Fax 604-682-8728

1 1 1 I

September 15,1995.

Page 2: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

ii

DRILLING REPORT

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

j T (Hen 1-4 claims, 80 units

Record numbers 301509-301512 Cariboo Mining District

British Columbia

Lat. 52" 28' 54"N, Long. 121"01'38"W

DOUBLE CREEK MINING CORP.

SUMMARY

This Assessment Report desribes the work perf& during the 1995 drill program, and the results obtained. For a detailed geological summary, thereader is referred to a number of previous reports by F'rice, (1 986, I994), Medford, (I 989) and Bailey, (I 992, 1993). Much information and several maps for this report were derived from D.G.Bailey, with his permission. This report will enable the expiry dates to be advanced to year 2002 for all claims, subject to approval by the Mineral Titles Division.

The properly Comprises 80 claim units, and is situated between Hen Ingram Lake and Quesnel Lake approximately 30 kilometers northeast of the town of Horsefly, B.C. Horsefly is 50 kilometers east of Williams Lake, B.C., a major supply and service center.

Geology of the property and the surrounding area has been well-summarized by Bailey, (1992). Briefly, the claims lie within a northwesterly trending belt of Upper Triassic pelitic sedimentq rocks within the "Quesnellia" terrain which are host to a number of si@kant gold deposits, including Eureka Mtn. (Frasergold) and Spanish Mountain (CPW) deposits. The dark pelitic sediments are subject to regional metamorphism (greenschist facies), folding, faulting and homfelsing.

On the Hen property, strongly homfelsed Triassic black argillites, tuffs, siltstones and sandstones strike northerly and may be isoclinally folded. Dips are steep, but uniformly eastward where seen by the Writer. Gabbroic to dioritic dykes up to 30 meters wide wend northeasterly and lampmphyric dykes up to 2 meters wide also cut the metasediments. Major faults appear to be later than ,the dykes.

&ow exploration has outlined strongly homfelsed and pyritdpymhotite zones, and quartz-carbonate vein zones with sigdcant gold content. The percussion drill intercepts h m 1981 ranged !?om 0.002 opt to 0.027 opt. Selected samples of sulphide rich material h m Trench 1 have assayed up to 1.89 odton gold. (Yorston 1990). The mineralized areas have elevated levels of molybdenum, cobalt and arsenic.

Between May 28, and June 30, I 995, a drill program was completed of 6 NQ size drill holes for a total footage of 1,999 feet, (609.3 meters). Two hundred drillare samples were analysed by Acme Analytical Labs, Vancouver, B.C., for gold and 30 elements by ICP method% All results are tabulated in the Appendices. Cost of the program was $80,000.00, as shown in the accompanying Itemized cost statement.

In addition, 5 excavator trenches were dug and 18 rock samples were taken. Total excavated is roughly 103 cubic meters. At the completion of the drill program, trenches, sumps and last years trenches were all backfilled, and sites were cleaned of fallen logs using a chainsaw. Drill sites, roads and trenches were re- seeded.

Page 3: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I I I I I I I 1 I I

I 1 I I I I I I

~I

iii

The most siguficant intersections from the drill hole are as follows:

DDH FROM TO WIDTH GOLD

95- I 22.3111 23.51-11 1.2m 0.278 opt

95-2 32.3111 32.6111 0.6m 0.165 opt

95-3 30.2111 31.4111 1 . h 95-3 74.7111 76.2m 1.5 m 95-3 93m 107.2 m 14.2111 incl 103111 104.9 1.9m

95-5 17.8111 18.3111 0.5m 95-5 39.8111 52.3111 12.5111 incl. 50.7m 52.3111 I .6m

0.075 opt

0.054 opt 0.208 opt

0.621 opt. 0.0076 opt 0.099 opt

0.010 opt

In DDH 95-4, a short section, roughly IO meters wide, contained values from 210 ppm to 2132 ppm copper, averaging 0.092 % copper. More complete lists of mineralized intercepts are in the Appendix. Core logs and assay analytical sheets are also provided.

In spite of the relatively promising appearance of the mineralized trenches and the number of “anomalous” values in core, particularly the 14.2 meters (45 A) averaging 0.054 ounces per ton gold, in Hole 3, the mineralization is erratic, and it likely would be difficult with drilling or trenching to outlime an economic zone.

The mineralization, existing in strongly homfelsed sediments and volcaniw, may be the surface manifestation of a buried “pohyry” deposit. One shalt section of (weak) porphyry copper grades m u r s in Hole 95-4.

Considering the option payment due, the company has made the decision not to proceed with further exploration on this property.

respectllly submitted n

Dated Sept 15,1995.

Page 4: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I 1 I I I I I I I I I

iv

DRILLING REPORT

;y (Hen 1-4 claims, 80 units

Record numbers 301509-301512 Cariboo Mining District

British Columbia

DOUBLE CREEK MINING COW. TABLE OF CONTENTS

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 S-arY Induct ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Property and Ownership. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Mineralization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . .......................... 4 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Bibliography Certificate of Barry J.Price

APPENDICES

APPENDIX I - DRILLCOW ANALYSES, TRENCH SAMPLE ANALYSES APPENDIX I1 - FIELD AND LABORATORY METHODS APPENDIX 111- ITEMIZED COST STATEMENT

LIST OF FIGURES

Fig. I - Properly location map Fig. 2 - Location Map, Hen Ingram Lake Area Fig. 3 - Topography and claims. Fig 4. - Claim map. Fig. 5 - Regional Geology Fig. 6 - General Map of grid and drillholes Fig 7 - General map of trenches

Page 5: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

1

DRILLING REPORT

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

rn HEN ERTY (Hen 1-4 claims, 80 units

Record numbers 301509-301512 Cariboo Mining District, British Columbia

DOUBLE CREEK MINING COW.

INTRODUCTION

At the request of Greg Amor, President of Double Creek Mining Corp., I have described a drill program canied out by the company at the Hen claims, near Hen Ingram Lake, east of Horsefly, B.C. between May 30 and June 26, 1995. This Assessment Report describes the work performed and the results obtained under the supervision of D.Bailey. Ph.D., P.Eng., and Robert Yorston, B.Sc. The drill program included 6 NQ size drill holes for a total footage of 1,999 feet, (609.3 meters). Two hundred drill-core samples were analysed by Acme Analytical Labs, Vancouver, B.C., for gold and 30 elements by ICP methods. All results are tabulated in the Appendices. Cost of the program was $80,000.00, as shown in the accompanyhg itemized cost statement.

For a detailed geological summary, the reader is referred to a number of previous reports by Price, (1986 and 1994), Medford, (1989) and Bailey, (1992, 1993). Much information and several maps for this report were derived from D.G.Bailey, with his permission.

PROPERTY AND OWNERSHIP

The property comprises 80 claim units in four claims as tabulated below. The claims are held by Double Creek Mining Corporation, Ste 808 - 11 11 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6E 2J3, under option from vendors Victor Guinet and Brian Fenwick-Wilson.

PR P RTY

Claim Name Units Record No. Expiry Date

Hen 1 20 301509 July 8,2002 Hen 2 20 301510 July 8, 2002 Hen 3 20 301511 July 8,2002 Hen 4 20 301512 July 8, 2002

TOTAL 80 units SOURCE. MEMPR CLAIM INFORMATION SYSTEM

Page 6: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

0 s Lacation Map, He; Ingram Lake Are After Bailey 19!Q

SCALE t :,250,000

Page 7: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I I 'I I I I1 I I I

BRITISH COLUMBIA \v yqyy VANCOUVER \

. .

9; J; PRICE

Fig. I Property location map After Bailey,

".

Page 8: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

2

This report will enable the expiry dates to be advanced to the year noted above, subject to approval by the Mineral Titles Division.

I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I

LOCATION, ACCESS AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

The Hen property is situated between Hen Ingram Lake and Quesnel Lake approximately 30 kilometers northeast of the town of Horsefly, B.C. Horsefly is 50 kilometers east of Williams Lake, B.C., a major supply and service center. An all-weather gravel road extends to Ghost Wilderness Lodge on the south shore of Quesnel Lake, about 6 kilometers north of the claims. From this road, a rough (4-wheel drive) road allows access to the Hen claims and Hen Ingram Lake. Several old logging and mining access roads in various states of repair allow access to much of the claim block, which is covered largely by immature spruce forest. The claims are shown in Figure 3.

HISTORY

The property was initially explored as the Keno property (KE and LO claims) by Helicon Explorations Ltd. (V.Taylor) in 1964 during a regional exploration program for porphyry copper deposits. After a program of trenching, IP surveys and diamond drilling, (7 holes), no copper porphyry target was obtained, and the property was allowed to lapse. The property was re-staked in 1979 by Dallas Stanley and partners for the Stanley Resource Group, and G.A.Noel supervised a program of mapping, trench sampling and percussion drilling. V.Guinet and B.Fenwick-Wilson re-staked the claims in 1984, and the writer inspected the property and re-sampled and mapped the discovery trench in 1986. Double Creek Mining Corp. optioned the property &om V.Guinet and partners in 1992.

REGIONAL and LOCAL GEOLOGY

Geology of the property and the surrounding area has been well-summarized by Bailey, (1992). Briefly, the claims lie within a northwesterly trending belt of Upper Triassic pelitic sedimentary rocks within the "Quesnellia" terrain which are host to a number of significant gold deposits, including Eureka Mm. (Frasergold) and Spanish Mountain (CPW) deposits. The dark pelitic sediments are subject to regional metamorphism (greenschist facies), folding, faulting and hornfelsing.

On the Hen property, strongly hornfelsed Triassic black argillites, tuffs, siltstones and sandstones strike northerly and may be isoclinally folded. Dips are steep, but uniformly eastward where seen by the writer. Gabbroic to dioritic dykes up to 30 meters wide trend northeasterly and lamprophyric dykes up to 2 meters wide also cut the metasediments. Major faults appear to be later than the dykes.

MINERALIZATION

On the Hen property, previous exploration has outlined strongly homfelsed and pyritelpyrrhotite zones and quartz-carbonate vein zones with significant gold content. The percussion drill intercepts from 1981 ranged from 0.002 opt to 0.027 opt. Selected samples of sulphide rich material from Trench 1 have assayed up to 1.89 odton gold. (Yorston 1990). The mineralized areas have elevated levels of molybdenum, cobalt and arsenic.

Page 9: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I I I I I

Fig. 3 Topography and claims.

Page 10: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I I I I I I I 1 I- I 1 1 I I I I I I I

. .

A

HEN 2

Page 11: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

8

1 I I I

Fig. 5 Regional Geology After Bailey 1992

Page 12: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

3

1995 DIULLJNG PROGRAM:

Between May 30 and June 26, 1995, the writer and Robert Yorston, BSc. supervised a program of diamond drilling with a minor amount of backhoe trenching and trench-sampling. Diamond drilling of 6 NQ size holes totalling 1,999 feet or 609.3 meters was done by Backhoe trenching was done by Robert Mickle of Likely, B.C. using a Kubota "Trackhoe". Trench sampling was done by R.Yorston, V.Guinet and W.Mickle, assistant. Rock samples were analyses by Acme Analytical Laboratory, in Vancouver, B.C. AU results are tabulated in the Appendices. Cost of the program was $80,000, as shown in the accompanying Itemized cost statement.

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

A table of drill hole data follows:

DRILL HOLE LOCATION AZrmUTH INCLN, DEF'RI

95-1 985ON/IOO+l IE 065 -45 73.8 m 95-2 9750N/IOOE 060 -45 60.4 m 95-3 101+40N/101+20E 270 -45 131.1 m 95-4 10 1 +I 4N/l 00+ 16E 070 -45 115.8m 95-5 103+05N/100+06E 060 -45 114.9 m 95-6 100+00N/93+50E 062 -45 113.4 m

Trenching:

Excavating of the 5 small trenches was done by prospector R. Mickle and partner working with a Kubota "Track Hoe". This machine was also used to infill and re-contour the 1994 and 1995 trenches, and the drill sites and trenches were re-seeded. The 5 trenches were as follows:

TRENCH NO. LOCATION LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH

TRENCH 95-1 L102NB550E 9 METERS I METER 1 METER TRENCH 95-2 9330NB560E 3 METERS 1 METER 1 METER TRENCH 95-3 9800N/9600E 25METERs 2METER 1 METER TRENCH 95-4 9800N/%50E ISMETERS 2METER 1 METER TRENCH 95-5 10750N/9775E 7 METERS 1 METER 1 METER

Total excavated is roughly 103 cubic meters. The accompanying figure shows the trenches and

assays.

There were 200 drillare and 18 trench rock samples taken. Each sample was 5-10 Ib of rock taken

as grab samples or across specified widths as chip samples. Rock samples were crushed, split and pulverized

to -150 mesh size fraction and analyses in duplicate by fire assay methods followed by Atomic Absorption

Spectrophotometric analysis.

Trench samples and assays are given on the following page:

Page 13: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

4 I I I I I I I I I I I

TRENCH SAMPLE WIDTH GOLD ppb 95-1 1 60 cm 11 PPb

95-2 1 60 cm. 19 PPb

95-3 1 2 3 4 5 6

95-4 1 2 3 4 5

95-5 1 2 3 4

1.0 m 7 PPb 1.2 m 1520 ppb 1.0 m 2680 ppb 1.5 m 14260 ppb 1.5 m 550 ppb 1.5 m 85 PPb

1.4 m 98 PPb

1.5 m 36 PPb

1.0 m 28 PPb

1.2 m 210 ppb

1.7 m 1450 ppb

1.3 m 120 ppb 1.0 m 120 ppb

grab 1240 ppb .75 m 95 PPb

Assays by Acme Analytical Laboratory, Vancouver, B.C.

Trench sample notes are provided in an Appendix

‘I I I I I I I I

COST OF THE PROGRAM -

Total cost of the exploration program applicable to Assessment was $80,000.00. An itemized cost statement is provided in the Appendices. Receipts for all items are available on request to the writer.

DISCUSSION: (After notes by RYorston).

The drill sites were chosen to test some of the magnetic anomalies and some of the northwest-trending EM conductors. Hole 3 was oriented to cut the northwest-trending fracture zone exposed in Trench 1.

All drill holes encountered siltstone, argillite, sandstone, minor limestone and very minor amounts of tuffaceous material. The sediments are cut by small intrusions - mainly dykes and possibly sills. The diorite seen in holes 1 and 2 may be a larger body which could be a stock. The diorite is accompanied by strong propylitic alteration and degeneration of the chloritized amphiboles or pyroxene grains, as noted by D.Bailey.

The most significant of the minor intrusions are the mineralized dykes of feldspar porphyry. These are described as variably porphyritic, with rounded or sub-rounded white feldspars in a fine-grained siliceous

Page 14: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

5

groundmass that is usually brownish. This rock usually contains disseminated pyrrhotite and lesser amounts of chalcopyrite. The porphyry bodies may have quenched borders, and, locally, may not be recogmiable as a porphyry. It may also be soft, chloritized and un-mineralized. This type of intmsion appears to be late- stage, and cuts an earlier, fresher, intrusive phase of biotite feldspar porphyry in Holes 3 and 5.

All intrusivdsediment contacts are potentially favourable for sulphide mineralization, but the brownish porphyry is e s p e d y favourable, and the porphyry itself can also host sulphide veinlets and masses in late fracture systems. Mineralized zones also occur within the siliceous greenish siltstone at its boundary with the less-reactive argillite.

Some drill holes encountered intense silicification with associated irregular bleaching of the sediments. This type of alteration is especially prevalent in hole 4, and to a lesser extent in Hole 3. Later deformation resulted in a “crackle” brecciation, or fine micro-brecciation which is usually healed by fine black chlorite or manganese minerals.

The long section of porphyry seen in Hole 4 is probably a result of drilling down the dip of one of the porphyry dykes. Near the bottom, and below the porphyry intersection, the appearance of the core suggests that the hole should contain strong gold mineralization. Alteration, silicification, and sulphide veinlets and masses are similar or better than those of Hole 3. It may be si@cant that in Hole 3, the sulphide zone is mainly in sediments, whereas in Hole 4 the main sulphide zone is in the porphyry.

Bedding planes observed in Hole 3 indicate that the drill hole passed through a fold. The pervasive silica flooding in hole 4 destroyed most bedding characteristics, but it appears as though the main sulphide zone in both holes lies immediately to the west of a presumed fold hinge.

Argillite was intersected in Holes 3,, 4, and 5, but only Hole 6 contained long intersections of argillite and intrusives. The argillite showed large areas of discontinuous tension fractures, which were healed by pyrite and/or quartz-carbonate. This deformation may be equivalent to the crackle brecciation seen in Hole 4. Graphite exists as an alteration product of the argillite, and strong graphite and fault zones are probably responsible for the conductive geophysical anomalies in the Hole 6 area.

The magnetic anomalies drilled in Holes 2 and 4 have not been fully explained. In Hole 2, 30 centimeters of massive pyrrhotite was cored at the contact between porphyry and diorite, but larger pyrrhotite zones were encountered in other holes that showed no surface magnetic signature. The pyrrhotite is always weakly to moderately magnetic where cored. The only magnetite identified was a very minor amount in the biotite feldspar porphyry in Hole 3. The biotite appears to be secondary, and represents potassic alteration.

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I i

MINERALIZATION: (After notes by RYorston):

Sulphide mineralization intersected in drill holes 1 through 5 was predominantly pyrrhotite with much lesser amounts of chalcopyrite and pyrite. Chalcopyrite can occur alone, but is usually intimately associated with pyrrhotite. In the strong sulphide zones, it often rims the pyrrhotite, suggesting later crystallization. And possibly some replacement. Pyrite is most common as coarse secondary pyritohedrons on open fracture surfaces. However, fine grained pyrite was also rarely seen in fractures cutting the pyrrhotite.

In the feldspar porphyry, pyrrhotite and much lesser chalcopyrite commonly occur as disseminations,

Page 15: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

6

and in the tuff or sediments, they occasionally occur in 2 centimeter wide bands of disseminations conformable to bedding.

The stronger sulphide zones usually have several fractures up to 1 or 2 centimeters wide filled with sulphides. Also, some larger open spaces filled by sulphides often have sulphides branching out in dendritic patterns. Core intersections of up to 30 centimeters of massive sulphide, pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite. Rarely, arsenopyrite occurs as blebs enclosed by pyrrhotite.

Minor pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite and pyrite can occur within quartz-carbonate veinlets and brecciated zones, but these are not particularly common in Holes 1-5. Coarse sparry calcite lenses and veins to 2.5 cm. Occur rarely, and can also contain blebs of sulphides at their boundaries.

In drill hole 6, minor pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite are disseminated in some porphyry intersections, but most mineralization consists only of pyrite. Most fractures are healed by fine pyrite and by quartz carbonate. They occasionally occur together, but more commonly separately. There are at least two generations of quartz-carbonate fracture-filling.

At least part of the gold mineralization appears to have occurred with a late mineralization event, associated with pyrite and chalcopyrite. However, the rare arsenopyrite shows the strongest correlation with gold. And wherever this mineral is seen, it has been enclosed in pyrrhotite. Pyrrhotite by itself may not be particularly significant. Chloritized zones and mineralized quartz-carbonate veins are also important indicators for gold.

I I I I I I I I I I I iI I I I I I I I

INTERSECTIONS:

The most significant intersections fiom the drill hole are as follows:

DDH FROM TO WIDTE GOLD

95-1 95-2 95-3 95-3 95-3 incl 95-5 95-5 incl.

22.3111 32.3m 30.2m 74.7111 93m 103111 17.8m 39.8111 50.7m

23.5111 32.6111 3 1.4m 76.2m 107.2 m 104.9 18.3111 52.3111 52.3111

1.2m 0.3m 1.2m 1.5 m 14.2111 1.9 m 0.5m 12.5m I .6m

0.278 opt 0.165 opt 0.075 opt 0.010 opt 0.054 opt 0.208 opt 0.621 opt. 0.0076 opt 0.099 opt

InDDH 95-4, a short section, roughly 10 meters wide, contained values from 210 ppm to 2132 ppm copper, averaging 0.092 % copper. More complete lists of mineralized intercepts are in the Appendix. Core logs and assay analytical sheets are also provided.

Page 16: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

. .

,

DRILLHOLE 95-5

102 1

. . "

DRILLHOLE 95-4 I

DRILLHOLE 95-1 1

i 4

. OeA

B DRILLHOLE 95-2 @

E

..-.

r4

95-3

~ sump '0

. . .

IS = SILTSTONE, SANDSTONE I A = ARGILLITE D = DIORITE

1 Hen Ingram Lake Area, B.C.

FIGURE 6A GRID, DRILLHOLES AND INTERCEPTS

DRILLHOLES 95-1 TO 95-5

B.J.Price Geological Consultmts Inr 1995

Page 17: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

x 9dd

J . T*

I Hen Ingram Lake Area, B.C. I FIGURE 6B

GRID, DRILLHOLES AND INTERCEPTS DFULLHOLE 95-6

B.J.Price Geological Co~~sdtmts Inc. 1995

Page 18: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

-I I 1 I 1 -I I I 1 I I 1 -. 1 I I

*

~ -. . __ - . .....

. . . . . . . . . . .

. .

... ..

W . d b

- . .- ... ...... - 0 5 m

T R 9 5 - \ T A ~ ~ - L

~ ~~

. .

.... ........ . . . .. . _ _ . .. _. ....

i r4

b-

Isu p,h qe

w ,Li* :-4 m

210

3b

* S 2 8 o n

AND ASSAYS B.J.Price Geological Consultants Inc. 1995

Page 19: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

RECOMMENDATIONS

In spite of the relatively promising appearance of the mineralized trenches and the number of “anomalous” values in core, particularly the 14.2 meters (45 fi) averaging 0.054 ounces per ton gold, in Hole 3, the mineralization is erratic, and it likely would be difficult with drilling or trenching to outline an economic zone.

The mineralization, existing in strongly homfelsed sediments and volcanics, may be the surface manifestation of a buried “porphyry” deposit. One short section of (weak) porphyry copper grades occurs in Hole 95-4.

Considering the option payment due, the company has made the decision not to proceed with hrther exploration on this property.

respectiidly submitted n fD

Ban). J.Pric$, M A . , P.Geo. Consulting Geologist. Sept 15, 1995.

Page 20: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

BIBLIOGRAPHY I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Bailey, David G., (1991); Geological Evaluation of the Hen Claims, Cariboo Mining Division. Private Report for Guinet and Fenwick-Wilson dated September 1991.

MoC Philip G., (1965); Report on the Induced Polarization and Resistivity Survey on the Keno East Claim Group, Quesnel Lake Area, B.C., Assessment Report No. 683 for Chapman Wood and Griswold Ltd., dated August 4, 1965.

Jones, Harold M., (1981); Report on Rock Sampling and Percussion Drilling in Trench No. 1, BTEM Claim Group, Quesnel Lake Area, Cariboo Mining Division, 93A-6E. Assessment Report No. 9122 for Stanley Resource Group. dated April 10, 1981.

Medford, Gary A., (1989); Geological, Geochemical and Geophysical Survey of the Hen 1-5 claims, Cariboo Mining Division, NTS 93A6E and 11E. Private Report for Tulloch Resources Inc., dated January 1989.

Price, Barry J., (1986); Geological Report, Hen #1 claim (Rec No. 631 I), Horsefly Area, B.C., Mapsheet 93AdE, Cariboo Mining Division. Assessment Report for V.Guinet and B.Fenwick-Wilson, dated November 1. 1986.

Price, Barry J., (1994); Geological Geochemical and Trenching Report, Hen #1-#4 claims. , Horsefly Area, B.C., Mapsheet 93A-66 Cariboo Mining Division. Assessment Report for V.Guinet and B.Fenwick-Wilson, dated June 1994.

Trenholme, L.S., (1979); Report of Examination, BTEM claims, Quesnel Lake Area, Cariboo Mining Division, British Columbia. Private Report for Dallas Stanley dated July 16, 1979.

Yorston, R., (1990); Geological Summary Report on the Hen 1-5 claims. Private Report for V.Guinetand B.Fenwick-Wilson, dated November 1990.

Yorston, R, (1995); Geological notes on drill program on the Hen 1-4 claims. Private Report for V.Guinet and B.Fenwick-Wilson

Page 21: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

CERTIFICATE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

1. Banv James Price. M.Sc.. herebv cert ifi t b

I am an independent Consulting Geologist and Professional Geoscientist residing at 820 East 14th Street, North Vancouver B.C., with my office at 716 - 850 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C. (Telephone: 682-4488)

I graduated from University of British Columbia, Vancouver B.C., in 1965 with a Bachelors Degree in Science (B.Sc.) Honours, in the field of Geology, and received a ikrther Degree of Master of Science (M.Sc.) in Economic Geology from the same University in 1972.

I have practised my profession as a Geologist for the past 30 years since graduation, in the fields of Mining Exploration, Oil and Gas Exploration, and Geological Consulting.

I have worked in Canada, the United States of America, in Mexico, and in The Republic of Panama, - and the Republic of the Phillippines. -

I am a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada, and registered as a Professional Geoscientist (P.Geo.) in the Province of British Columbia and I am entitled to use the Seal, which has been &xed to this report. I am a member of the Society of Exploration Geologists, the Canadian Institute of Mining, and Society of Mining Engineers.

I have based this report on work done on the Hen property by R.Yorston and V.Guiiet for Double Creek Mining Corp., under my supervision in 1995 and on previous reports by Bailey, Medford, Jones and others.

I am a Director and shareholder ofDouble Creek Mining Corp. I will receive only n o d consulting fees for the preparation of this report.

I do not hold any interest, direct or indirect, in any claims within 50 kilometers of the subject property.

Dated at Vancouver B.C. this 15th day of September, 1995.

respectllly submitted I\

AC.. P.Geo. Conshting Geologist.

Page 22: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX I

ANALYSES BY ACME ANALYTICAL LABORATORY

Page 23: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I' I I I I I I I I d I I I I I I I I I

FROM m

0 4.9

12.2 16.2 17.7 20.4 22.3 23.5

25 35. I 36.4

39 40.4 41.8 44.8 50.9 53.3 55.5

57

FROM TO m m

0 3.7

15.9 17.4 31.7 32.3 32.6 33.7 35.2 40.8 43.3 45.1 48.8 50.6 51.8 53.5

ro m

4.9 12.2 16.2 17.7 20.4 22.3 23.5

25 35.1 36.4

39

41.8 44..8 50.9 53.3 55.5

57 73.8

40.4

DOUBLE CREEK MINING LTD. Hen Property

1995 DIAMOND DRILL RESULTS

DDH 95-1

WIDTH SAMPLE AU AC cu AU OPT m ppb PPm PPm OPt

WIDTH m

3.7 15.9 17.4 31.7 32.3 32.6 33.7 35.2 40.8 43.3 45. I 48.8 5G.6 51.8 53.5 60.4

4.9 NS 7.3 NS

4 1.5 2.7 NS 1.9 1.2 1.5

1.3 2.6 1.4 I .4

3 6.1 NS 2.4 2.2 NS 1.5

16.8 NS

10.1 NS

DDH 95-2 SAMPLE AU

PPb 3.7 NS

12.2 NS 1.5

14.3 NS 0.6 0.3 1.1 1.5 5.6 NS 2.5 1.8 3.7 NS 1.8 1.2 1.7 6.9 NS

Page 1

12 59

22 9540

8

140 53 13 8 4

9

31

0.278

8

27 5640

62 I 140

27 23

4 5

10

0.165 0.033

Page 24: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

FROM m

0 5.5 6.7 7.3 8.8

12.2 14.3 16.5 19.1

21 23.8 25.2 28.3 30.2 31.4 32.6 34.1 36.9

39 40.2 42.2 44.2 16.3 47.8 49.4 50.9 52.3 54.3 55.5 57.6 59.4 63.7

64 64.4 66.9 68.3 69.3 70.3 73.2 74.7 76.2 77.7 79.8 80.8

82 83.5 85.1 86.6

TO m

5.5 6.7 7.3 8.8

12.2 14.3 16.5 19.1

21 23.8 25.2 28.3 30.2 31.4 32.6 34.1 36.9

39 10.2 12.2 44.2 36.3 17.8 49.1 50.9 52.3 54.3 55.5 57.6 59.4 63.7 64

64.4 66.9 68.3 69.3 70.3 73.2 74.7 76.2 77.7 79.8 80.8

a2 83.5 85.1 86.6 88.1

DDH 95-3

WIDTH SAMPLE

5.5 NS 1.2 NS 0.6 1.5 3.4 NS 2.1 2.2 2.6 1.9 2.8 I .1 3.1 NS 1.9 1.2 1.2 1.5 2.8 NS 2. I 1.2

2 2 NS

2. I 1.5 1.6 1.5 NS 1.4

2 NS 1.2 2.1 1.8 1.3 NS 0.3 NS 0.4 2.5 1.4 NS

1 1

2.9 NS 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.1

I I .2 1.5 1.6 1.5

m

1.5

Page 2

AU AG cu AU OPT PPb PPm PPm opt

70 27

15 17 77 8

28 6

20 3 6 0

140 17

13 4 9

5 I4 19

5

5 5 9

15 76

7 4

20 350

22 9 6 5 3

15 3 5

0.075 0.004

0.010

Page 25: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

DDH 95-3 FROM

m 88. I 89.6 91.7

93 94

95.5 97.5 99. I

100.6 103

104.9 107.2 108.7 110.8 112.3 113.8 115.3 116.8 118. I 119.6 124.5 126.5 128.6

FROM m

0 3

3.7 7

8.2 10.7 12.8 15.4 17.1 18.4 19.4 20.7 22. I 23.6 26.4 27.4 30.6 32.3

34 35.4 37.2 40.5

TO m

89.6 91.7

93 94

95.5 97.5 99. I

100.6 103

104.9 107.2 108.7 110.8 112.3 113.8 115.3 116.8 118.1 119.6 124.5 126.5 128.6 131.1

TO

CONTINUED WIDTH SAMPLE AU

m ppb 1.5 6 2.1 13 1.3 9

I 110 1.5 23

2 2170 I .6 3430 1.5 1140 2.4 210 1.9 7120 2.3 260 1.5 27 2.1 19 1.5 72 1.5 7 1.5 68 1.5 37 1.3 8 1.5 7 1.9 NS

2 200 2.1 98 2.5 NS 0

DDH 95-4 WIDTH SAMPLE AU

m m 3 3 NS

3.7 0.7 NS 7 3.3

8.2 1.2 NS 10.7 2.5 12.8 2.1 15.4 2.6 17. I 1.7 18.4 1.3 19.4 1 20.7 1.3 22.1 1.4 23.6 1.5 NS 26.4 2.8 27.4 I 30.6 3.2 32.3 1.7

34 1.7 35.4 1.4 37.2 1.8 NS 40.5 3.3 42. I I .6

AG cu AU OPT PPm PPm opt

0.003 0.001 0.063 0.100 0.033 0.006 0.208 0.008

0.006 0.003

AG cu PPb PPm PPm

230

10 27 75

120 14 6 3

20

29 15 4

15 6

54

5 18

Page 3

AU OPT opt

Page 26: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

DDH 95-4 FROM

m 42.1 43.4 45.3 16.3 52. I 53.6 55.1 56.7 58.2 72.2 73.7 74.3 75.7

77 78.3 79.6 81.1 82.5 84.3 85.7 86.6 89.2 90.8 93.3

95 96.7 98.7

101.2 102.4 105.5 106.7 108.2 I10

111.5 112.8

TO m

43.4 45.3 46.3 52.1 53.6 55. I 56.7 58.2 72.2 73.7 74.3 75.7

77 78.3 79.6 81.1 82.5 84.3 85.7 86.6 89.2 90.8 93.3

95 96.7 98.7

101.2 102.4 105.5 106.7 108.2

I IO I 11.5 112.8 114.2

CONTINUED WIDTH SAMPLE AU AG cu AU OPT

m ppb PPm PPm opt 1.3 5 1.9

1 5.8 NS 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.5 14 NS

1.5 0.6 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.4 0.9 2.6 1.6 2.5 1.7 1.7 NS

2 2.5 1.2 3. I 1.2 1.5 1.8 1.5 NS 1.3 1.4

Page 4

14 9

IO 5 5 9

7 39 x5 25 I4 18 18 88

480 2:

5 82 I2 6 6

I 1 19 24 31 13 3

22

13 2

2132 210 411

1649 749 I85 Y70 516

Page 27: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I I I I I I I I I I I , I

I I I I I I

FROM m

0 2.4 5.4 6.9 8.5

11.7 14.7 16.5 17.8 18.3 19.8 22.6 23.9 25.3 29. I 30.5 31.4 32.9 34.7 36.7 39.8 41.3 42.8 44.3 45.9 47.4 48.9 50.7 52.3 53.8 55.8 57.3 58.8 61.6 64.2 64.6 67.4

69 79.6 80.5 81.5 82.8 83.5 85.2 89.3 91.3 93.4 94.7 96.2

TO m

2.4 5.4 6.9 8.5

11.7 14.7 16.5 17.8 18.3 19.8 22.6 23.9 25.3 29. I 30.5 31.4 32.9 34.7 36.7 39.8 41.3 1218 44.3 45.9 47.4 48.9 50.7 52.3 53.8 55.8 57.3 58.8 61.6 64.2 64.6 67.4

69 79.6 80.5 81.5 82.8 83.5 85.2 89.3 9;.3 93.4 94.7 96.2 97.1

DDH 95-5 WIDTH SAMPLE AU AG cu AU OPT

m PPb ppm PPm O p t 2.4 NS

3 NS 1.5 22 1.6 69 3.2 5

1.8 30 1.3 65 0.5 21300 1.5 200 2.8 NS 1.3 53 1.4 86 3.8 NS 1.4 24 0.9 NS 1.5 21 1.8 I I

2 23 3.1 NS 1.5 640 1.5 1080 1.5 1130

1.5 20 1.5 260 1.8 14 1.6 3410 1.5 60

2 6 1.5 21 1.5 37 2.8 5 2.6 5 0.4 2.8 NS 1.6 350

10.6 NS 0 9 130

I NS 1.3 12 0.7 NS 1.7 16 4.1 NS

2 60 2.1 43 1.3 9 1.5 15 1.5 24

3 NS

1.6 98

0.621 0.006

0.019 0.032 0.033 0.003 0.001 0.008 0.002 0.099

0.010

0.001

Page 5

-

Page 28: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I

DDH 95-5 FROM

m 97.7 98.7

101.3 103.5 104.5 110.6 112. I

END

FROM m

0 18.8 20.3 21.3 25.2 27.1 28.6 30.1 31.6 33.4 35.4 36.7 38.7 40.7 42.7 44.2 45.7 47.2 49.2 51.2 52.7 54.2 56.5 59.1 61.6 63.1 69.6 71.3 76.2

78 79.6

82 83.2 99.2

100.9 102.6 104.5

TO m

98.7 101.3 103.5 104.5 110.6 112.1 114.9

ro m

18.8 20.3 21.3 25.2 27. I 28.6 30.1 31.6 33.4 35.4 36.7 38.7 40.7 42.7 44.2 45.7 47.2 49.2 51.2 52.7 54.2 56.5 59.1 61.6 63.1 69.6 71.3 76.2

78 79.6

82 83.2 99.2

100.9 102.6 104.5 106.7

CONTINUED WIDTH SAMPLE AU

m PPb I 85

2.6 260 2.2 63

I 60 6.1 NS 1.5 47 2.8 NS

DDH95-6 WIDTH SAMPLE AU

m PPb 18.8 NS 1.5

I 3.9 NS 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.8

2 1.3

2 2 2

1.5 1.5 1.5

2 2

1.5 1.5 2.3 2.6 2.5 1.5 6.5 NS 1.7 4.9 NS 1.8 I .6 2.4 NS 1.2 16 NS

1.7 1.7 I .9 2.2

Page 6

-

A G cu AU OPT PPm ppm opt

6 7

6 I O 7 1 2 3 3 3 5 3 6 5 5 4 3 5 5 5 5 3 4

23

4 5

10

5 5 4 4

Page 29: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

CONTINUED FROM TO WIDTH SAMPLE AU AC cu AU OPT

m m m PPb PPm PPm opt 106.7 108.8 2. I 3 I

I I I I

I I I I

I I I I

~I

Page 7

-.

Page 30: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I* I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I

DOUBLE CREEK MINING LTD. Hen Property Best 1995 Drill Intercepts

DDH 95-1

FROM TO WIDTH SAMPLE AU AG m m m PPb PPm

22.3 23.5 1.2 9540

DDH95-2 FROM TO WIDTH FEET AU AG m m m Ppb ppm

32.3 32.6 0.3 0.984 5640 32.6 33.7 1.1 3.608 1140

32.3 33.7 1.4 4.592

DDH95-3

FROM TO WIDTH WIDTH AU AC m m m

93 94 94 95.5

95.5 97.5 97.5 99.1 99.1 100.6

100.6 103 103 104.9

104.9 107.2

93 107.2

OR

FT 1

1.5 2

1.6 1.5 2.4 1.9 2.3

14.2

PPb ppm 3.2 I10 4.8 23 6.4 2170

5.12 3430 4.8 1140

7.68 210 6.08 7120 7.36 260

0 45.44

9.4 30.08

DDH 95-4

FROM TO WIDTH WIDTH AU A C m m m FT ppb PPm

73.7 74.3 0.6 1.92 39 74.3 75.7 1.4 4.48 85 75.7 77 1.3 4.16 25

77 78.3 1.3 4.16 14 78.3 79.6 1.3 4.16 I8

73.7 78.3 4.6 14.72

CU PPm

cu PPm

CU PPm

CU ppm

AU OPT opt

0.278

AUOPT A U X W OP'

0.165 0.161871 0.033 0.119968

0.0614 0.28184

AUOPT A U X W opt

0.003 0.003208 0.001 0.001006 0.063 0.126586 0.100 0.16007 0.033 0.049876 0.006 0.0147 0.208 0.394575 0.008 0.017442

0.054 0.767464

0.079 0.745807

AUOPT C U X W opt

2132 4093.44 2 10 940.8 411 1709.76

16-19 6859.84 749 3115.84

924 13603.84

Page 31: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

FROM TO m m

39.8 41.3 42.8 u . 3 45.9 47.4 48.9 50.7

DDH95-5

WIDTH WIDTE AU AG m FT PPb ppm

41.3 1.5 4.8 640 42.8 1.5 4.8 1080 44.3 1.5 4.8 1130 45.9 1.6 5.12 98 47.4 1.5 4.8 20 48.9 1.5 4.8 260 50.7 1.8 5.76 74 52.3 1.6 5.12 3410

39.8 52.3 12.5 40

cu AUOPT A U X W ppm . opt

0.019 0.028001 0.032 0.047251 0.033 0.049439 0.003 0.004573 0.001 0.000875 0.008 0.011375 0.002 0.003885 0.099 0.159137

0.007613 0.304536

Page 32: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

W L E 1

H95-1 23.5-25.0 H95-2 33.7-35.2 1195-4 3.7-7.0 H95-4 8.2-10.7 H95-4 10.7-12.8

H95-4 12.8-15.4

Uc)S-L 17.1-18.6 m%-6 15.4-17.1 . . . - . . . . . . . . H95-4 18.4-19.4 H95-4 19.4-20.7

RE H95-4 19.4-20.7 RRE H95-4 19.4-20.7 H95-4 20.7-22.1 H95-4 23.6-26.4 H95-4 26.4-27.4

m%-4 27.4-30.6 H95-4 30.6-32.3 H95-4 32.3-34.0 H95-4 34.0-35.4 H95-4 37.2-40.5

H95-4 40.5-42.1 H95-4 42.1-43.5 RE H95-4 42.1-43.5 RRE H95-4 42.1-43.5 H95-4 43.5-45.3

H95-4 45.3-46.3 H95-4 52.1-53.6 H95-4 53.6-55.1 H95-4 55.1-56.7 H95-4 56.7-58.2

WV3-4 72.2-73.7 H95-4 73.7-74.3 ~95-4 74.3-75.7 1195-4 75.7-77.0 H95-4 TI.0-78.3

H95-4 78.3-79.6 H95-4 79.6-81.1 STAWARD CIW-R

GEOCHEnICAt ANZ&YSIS CERTIFICATE Guinat Wanaoemsnt PROJECT DOWLE CREEK File # 95-1902 Page 1

310 Y i o c l Am?, V a I m w e r BC VSY ZL9

1 143 4 68 <.3 68 23 626 5.38 4 e5 <2 c2 4% .4 c2 c2 151 1.20 .119 6 135 1.95 72 .22 22 2.12 .wI .29 <2 8 1 37 Q 49 <.3 56 18 541 6.19 27 d <2 <2 35 .6 g2 <2 180 2.04 .125 12 56 2.23 27 .27 328 2.92 .04 .19 2 62

I9 185 13 23 <.3 167 28 306 3.49 10 5 *2 2 59 .2 <2 4 73 .E1 .wS 7 86 1.53 54 .M 5 1.47 .W -26 Q 230 I9 180 19 25 .3 86 26 350 3.60 9 4 Q 3 29 .3 <2 Q 59 1.12 .094 13 58 .% 38 .18 0 .83 .06 .M Q 10 b9 3% 30 13 .6 80 42 203 3.70 18 21 <2 6 23 .3 2 U 28 2.55 .lb4 35 39 .32 44 .20 0 .26 .OS .13 2 27

Y 402 a 42 1.1 58 (13 204 2.91 90 45 <2 7 16 .4 3 2 19 1.51 .in n 25 .u .is 0 .x .M .07 2 n 13 508 16 8 .5 113 77 144 3.80 66 d <2 5 10 .2 <2 Q 15 1.05 .Om 5 20 .19 27 .14 Q .I8 .03 .07 <2 120 10 280 11 14 .3 83 39 248 3.23 26 6 Q 5 12 c.2 <2 2 58 .74 .Of2 4 54 -54 43 .18 47 .W .04 .19 2 14 5 226 21 43 .4 104 30 153 3.78 11 4 <2 3 20 .5 <2 ~2 111 .46 .079 10 85 .93 51 .17 0 .75 .OS .M 2 6 2 223 38 61 <.3 68 28 248 3.60 7 d <2 3 13 .6 <2 <2 79 .65 .OW 6 50 1.26 45 .18 Q .87 .04 .13 <2 3

3 237 3 232 6 239 4 184 7 645

3 92 2 71 5 156 7 262 3 65

16 520 4 47 5 49 5 4 8 U 191

37 64 .4 69 28 252 37 67 .4 68 29 266 19 96 .4 242 102 356 15 30 s.3 126 24 216 19 36 .4 76 22 246

3.65 10 4 <2 4 13 3.62 10 4 <2 3 13 5.57 132 4 <2 2 21 3.72 19 <5 U 3 30 3.52 5 29 <2 2 27

7 ii <.3 110 15 in 2.64 9 4 e2 2 50 3 16 s.3 151 28 493 3.56 53 4 *2 3 33 5 15 <.3 38 15 190 2.30 7 4 <2 2 29

3.46 27 -5 <2 2 34 9 12 <.3 64 39 211 Q 9 <.3 91 12 199

1 6 0 . 4 7 2 1 7 2 6 2

2.11 8 4 e2 2 32

2.79 3 <5 <z z 53 <3 23 .4 42 14 2% 2.51 11 <5 <I 35 4 22 s.3 45 17 285 2.63 15 4 ~2 4 37 4 23 <.3 43 15 281 2.56 11 4 <2 4 36

14 301 .3 107 45 218 4.53 25 d -2 5 23

.5 <2 2 79 .66 .wl

.6 ~2 ~2 79 .65 .Ow 1.0 5 2 66 2.27 .133 1.1 <2 <2 82 .b3 .091 .4 Q <2 27 2.29 .W

e.2 Q <2 61 .53 .OM .2 18 <2 70 1.11 -084 .3 s2 <2 51 1.13 .lo8 .2 <2 c2 54 1.24 .1W .2 e <2 54 1.06 .085

.5 <2 4 51 1.98 .172

.3 s2 <2 6C 1.81 .Om <.2 <2 <2 64 1.89 .On

.3 <2 e 62 1.84 .OR 2.2 Q <2 6? 1.50 .lo2

6 51 1.27 45 .17 6 50 1.26 45 .17

17 79 1-68 38 .13 10 149 1.86 107 .19 48 27 .83 31 .12

Q .87 .03 .13 Q 5 <3 .87 .03 .12 <2 4 Q 1.10 .04 .21 2 20 Q 1.32 .07 .R Q 29 Q .& .05 .OB Q 15

15 58 1.66 132 .16 3 1.18 .wI -62 Q 4 15 171 2.29 114 .19 Q 1.55 .05 .50 2 15 25 37 .76 90 .16 Q .b2 .05 .38 <2 6 29 35 .67 92 .17 Q .60 .06 .39 2 !i4 17 63 1.28 96 .18 (i .95 .06 .a 2 5

36 41 1.19 A 7 .16 12 49 1.34 55 .16 12 51 1.40 57 .18 13 50 1.36 56 .17 26 49 1.09 25 .17

Q .78 .05 .26 Q I 8 Q .86 .03 .31 3 5 Q .91 .03 .32 2 12 3 .E8 .03 .31 3 4

Q .69 .04 .OB Q 14

4 48 Q 11 <.3 53 29 452 3.07 29 e5 <2 4 23 .2 <2 <2 71 2.28 .OM 4 33 1.31 17 .18 Q .93 .04 .06 <2 9 18 180 Q 15 g.3 89 29 1124 7.27 3 d e2 <2 24 .2 Q <2 181 2.27 .lo1 5 W 3.24 22 .23 Q 2.33 .05 -11 <2 10 11 506 29 49 .3 93 28 676 4.86 3 4 <2 g2 25 .7 Q Q 104 l.% .116 6 60 1.81 54 .22 4 1.62 -05 .21 Q 5 22 271 20 61 e.3 129 33 501 5.16 2 <5 e2 *2 22 .6 <2 2 89 1.M .lo7 9 76 1.57 53 .20 Q 1.40 .05 .25 Q 5 21 102 G 18 <.3 147 36 830 7.74 21 c5 <2 <2 18 .3 ~2 ‘2 144 1.50 .W3 7 188 3.42 82 .24 <3 2.89 .04 .51 2 9

7 71 7 45 s.3 99 23 589 4.92 10 d Q Q 21 .5 Q ~2 105 1.42 .W1 13 149 2.39 36 .23 29 2.00 .05 .15 Q 7 8 2132 25 83 2.1 702 412 166 26.43 100 4 <2 2 9 .8 <2 5 15 .76 .048 2 11 .44 13 .03 Q .41 .02 .03 3 39 2 210 12 73 .3 209 133 327 5.21 166 <5 <2 2 19 .6 4 *2 53 1.43 .M7 13 138 1.90 69 .15 11 1.24 .06 .46 <2 83 2 411 8 485 <.3 303 95 477 6.36 86 e5 <2 2 13 3.8 <2 <2 56 1.01 .Ob8 30 250 2.78 55 .15 Q 1.74 .04 .39 Q 25 4 1649 14 153 1.2 367 186 178 12.81 9 6 %? 4 14 1.4 5 5 12 .84 -087 13 18 .39 36 .09 Q .30 .02 .06 2 14

3 749 13 114 .7 104 61 211 4.09 20 4 <2 2 16 1.0 <2 2 18 1.07 .127 5 29 .29 31 .16 Q .21 .02 .06 2 18 4 185 4 58 A 60 52 240 2.66 53 4 <2 4 15 .4 <2 <2 27 1.13 .lM 5 45 .64 32 .17 Q .45 .04 .07 2 18

23 58 38 127 6.6 76 32 1116 4.08 44 16 7 36 50 17.8 16 20 61 .52 .O% 43 60 .92 186 .M 27 1.89 .06 .lI 11 470

ICP - .500 CWl SMPLE IS DIGESTED WITH 3WL 3-1-2 HCL-HN03-H20 AT 95 OEG. C FOR WE HCUR AND IS DILUTED TO 10 ML WITH WATER. THIS LEACH IS PARTIAL FOR MY fE SR U P LA CR MG BA T I B U AN0 LIMITED FOR YA I: AND AL. ASSAY REUII(ENDE0 FOR R U X A Y ) CORE SUlPLES I f CU PB 7.N AS > 1%. AG > 30 PPI( L AU > lOW PPB

DATE RBCEI SI- BY...’........ e & D.TOIE, C.LEOYG, J . W G ; CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAYERS

I l I I

Page 33: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

t3UiDet HaDagemODt PROJECT DOUBLE CREEK FILE # 95-1902 Page 2

H95-4 81.1-82.5 H95-4 82.5-84.3

RE H95-4 84.3-85.7 H95-4 84.3-05.7

IW5-4 85.746.6

9 970 4 350 .8 57 120 231 2.66 169 <5 e2 4 19 2.6 <2 2 26 1.38 .076 19 39 .49 32 .12 4 .40 .05 .Ob <2 88 9 516 3 32 .9 57 53 293 1.99 75 <5 g2 6 26 .3 c2 c2 22 2.29 .Om 9 46 .52 23 .16 4 .39 .05 .05 C2 480

54 397 18 90 .5 155 105 29b 3.86 120 c5 Q 3 19 .6 Q Q 3b 1.19 .074 5 65 .89 18 .16 c1 .65 .05 .06 Q 20 56 410 15 93 .5 158 io3 330 3.97 125 <5 ~2 2 20 .a ~2 ~2 36 1.23 .on 5 a .92 1.3 .i7 4 .M .os .07 Q 22

4 170 17 60 .4 391 40 389 4.61 13 d Q c2 75 .b Q Q 76 .91 .071 5 176 3.22 100 .24 6 2.25 .a -84 Q 5

IW5-4 M.6-89.2 H95-4 89.2-90.8 H95-4 W.8-93.3 H95-4 93.3-95.0 Sll l loARD CIW-II

I S m l e twe: CORE. S a n ~ L e s kcrimins 'RE' are Rerws end 'RRE' are Reject RerW,

9 227 5 21 c.3 39 60 242 1.m M <5 Q 4 u .3 2 Q 30 i . ~ .on 12 ZT .u 3t1 .M 3 .37 -05 .07 2 K 5 96 9 28 s.3 74 19 338 2.03 17 d Q 3 26 .3 2. Q 44 1.88 .Ow 22 59 .95 37 -19 4 .a .Ob .13 c2 12 4 1R 7 15 c.3 118 27 245 3.59 9 d c2 2 60 .2 Q Q 89 .85 .OB1 10 M 1.64 123 .O 4 1.54 .ll .70 Q 6

40 94 6 8 s.3 46 22 1822.57 14 d Q 3 21 .3 2 Q 75 .70 .W7 13 Lo .% 76 .22 82 .m .06 .28 Q 6 19 60 38 123 6.6 74 30 10573.95 43 18 7 35 48 17.3 17 21 65 .51 .OW 43 57 .89 192 .09 30 1.89 .U .15 11 520

Page 34: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I; * E TI co Bc 1 53 0 -1

QEOCHBMICAL AUALYSIS CBRTIFICATE

310 WIsd Ave, V m a m r 8 C V5Y 2L9 Guinet Manaaement PROJECT D OUBLE File X 95-1939

SAMPLE#

H95-4 w.7-98.7 H95-4 98.7-101.2 H95-4 101.2-102.4 H95-4 102.4-105.5 H95-4 105.5-106.7

H95-4 106.7-108.2 .... . H95-4 108.2-110.0 H95-4 110.0-111.5 H95-4 112.8-114.3 RE H95-4 112.8-114.3

RRE H95-4 112.8-114.3 H95-5 5.4-6.9 H95-5 6.9-8.5 H95-5 8.5-11.7 H95-5 14.7-16.5

H95-5 16.5-17.8 .. . - - . -. . . . . - H95-5 17.8-18.3 H95-5 18.3-19.8 H95-5 22.6-23.9 H95-5 23.9-25.3

H95-5 29.1-30.5 RE H95-5 29.1-30.5 RRE H95-5 29.1-30.5 H95-5 31.4-32.9 H95-5 32.9-34.7

H95-5 34.7-36.7 H95-5 39.8-41.3 H95-5 41.3-42.8 H95-5 42.8-44.3 H95-5 44.3-45.9

H95-5 45.9-47.4 H95-5 47.4-48.9 H95-5 48.9-50.7 STANDARD CIMI -R

a p P ~

10 254 5 3 6 9 6 547 5 4 4 2 228

5 14 2 2016 2 111 4 9 4 9

3 12 4 219 3 156 3 210 3 233

5 161 7 715 4 232 5 76 2 47

2 8 3 2 9 3 2 6 9 6 393 3 6 3

3 49 9 1% 4 109 3 141 4 222

2 7 2 4 9 9 4 92 I9 60 -

pPpPppIPPPPpP x p P p P p p l ~ p P p P p P p P p P x x 14 49 .7 65 22 135 2.11 15 d <2 4 27 .2 3 e2 34 -90 .lo1 11 32 .3 59 30 168 2.67 29 10 e2 3 27 e.2 2 ~2 37 1.05 .lo3 10 52 .7 170 48 245 4.64 45 17 e2 4 28 .2 4 e2 53 .91 .OM 14 16 *.3 180 22 362 2.93 37 <5 Q 3 45 e.2 2 e2 82 1.37 .075 9 26 .6 114 24 86 2.76 8 6 <2 4 27 <.2 2 ~2 21 1.61 .166

4 6 -3 16 2 119 -51 16 12 <2 4 29 s.2 2 e2 13.1.81 .I21 . .- . . . . . . . . .- - ._ . . -. . . -. 19 652 2.2 165 6f 178 7.62 22 6 <I 3 ii 4;i ei e2 36 3.70 .283 53 116 .4 363 30 400 4.97 18 <5 <2 *2 36 .6 <2 <2 76 1.68 .lo1 7 10 .4 30 4 141 1.04 18 7 <2 5 28 e.2 <2 e2 34 1.32 .160 6 12 <.3 33 4 148 1.15 17 e5 <2 5 30 e.2 2 e2 38 1.49 .182

6 11 <.3 33 4 158 1.16 15 d c2 3 30 s.2 2 e2 39 1.54 -183 ~ . . .~ ~. .. . .. - . . . . . . . . .. 7 5 .3 75 2 i 1W 2.60 40 10 ii 7 18 ii Q 2 25 1.42 .228 3 5 c.3 27 42 211 1.67 94 e5 <2 3 14 e.2 e2 e2 6 .93 .120 8 26 g.3 140 25 317 4.51 12 e5 e2 3 47 <.2 5 e2 64 .88 .085 7 21 .5 76 30 204 3.95 23 20 <2 5 32 g.2 3 e2 59 .71 .129

6 10 s.3 94 29 287 3.53 68 d e2 3 20 <.2 2 3 69 .52 .lo3 9 19 6.8 140 155 132 6.99 723 9 s2 2 14 g.2 4 e2 54 .52 .071 6 12 c.3 71 54 102 2.57 156 <5 <2 3 21 <.2 <2 e2 48 .59 .120 13 42 g.3 W 40 271 3.03 88 <5 <2 2 21 <.2 2 2 38 A9 .lo4 7 17 <.3 49 10 2W 2.65 26 13 <2 4 25 <.2 <2 e2 56 .40 .083

4 14 s.3 548 38 246 3.39 17 d e 2 29 c.2 e2 e2 52 1-29 .wQ - -. - . - . . -. . . . . ~~~ .. -~ .. 4 15 *.3 602 42 276 3.64 22 <5 <i <2 31 <;i <i ~2 56 1.40 .lo7 3 15 e.3 645 45 2E2 3.62 22 <5 Q 2 30 s.2 4 G? 55 1-42 .097 13 6 .6 75 22 128 2.86 13 e5 e2 2 38 e.2 2 e2 35 1.12 .I38 7 6 <.3 41 10 224 1.91 13 <5 <2 2 26 <.2 <2 e2 34 .79 . I O 6

3 10 .3 62 10 732 2.15 18 e5 Q 2 87 <.2 2 e2 49 5.41 .I06 5 9 .7 90 71 328 3.68 314 16 <2 5 20 <.2 2 G? 91 1.31 .On 3 7 .5 44 53 202 2.39 243 <5 s2 4 16 .2 2 2 31 1.47 .lo1 5 28 .7 60 68 197 2.90 366 <5 <2 3 24 s.2 2 e2 44 .74 .114 7 38 .3 63 34 137 3.00 115 4 <2 4 28 .2 e2 <2 54 .85 .135

<3 16 s.3 36 14 175 1.68 32 6 <2 2 25 <.2 <2 <2 31 .87 .119 3 22 <.3 30 15 238 1.80 64 6 <2 <2 31 s.2 <2 <2 29 1.30 .155 3 16 <.3 42 10 200 1.33 43 d <2 2 15 <.2 <2 <2 21 1.07 .118 37 129 6.5 74 31 1096 4.12 43 16 6 35 48 17.3 17 18 60 .54 .095

pPpP

18 31 15 29 9 41 8 115 43 26

13 15 60 27 5 213 13 30 15 31

15 32 33 32 47 16 16 63 26 39

2970 39 40 26 40 23 26 15 40

16 214 17 231 15 232 21 28 18 24

13 33 50 69 40 33 63 38 31 39

21 26 37 21 21 26 41 61 -

X P P X P P .24 50 .15 4 .49 54 .16 4 .70 64 .13 4

2.00 56 .19 4 .20 14 -13 3

x x x p p

-28 .06 .07 e2 .47 .07 .09 2 .58 .06 .27 e2 1.36.06 .a e2 .21 .07 .03 2

.ll 43 .12 3 .18 .07 .07 e2 1.25 8 .08 92 .a1 .W .01 e2

.63 59 .15 4 .53 .07 .11 <2 4.16 136 .23 10 2.52 .06 1.21 2

.71 67 .16 4 .59 .08 .ll <2

.?3 66 -17 5 .. ... . .61 .08 .11 <2

.26 43 .20 176 .22 .03 .11 2

.21 15 .16 6 .20 .04 .06 e2 1.62 66 .22 23 1.63 .15 .76 3 .79 79 .21 5

1.03 R -17 Q .25 31 .08 4 .28 43 .16 Q .95 111 .16 4 1.03 167 .16 3

4.23 58 .15 24 4.60 60 .16 26 4.R 57 .15 29 .27 63 .19 3 .42 96 .18 3

1.00 78 .17 4 1.07 33 .17 Q .55 39 .18 17 .84 61 .15 3 1.02 69 .17 3

.58 61 .15 7

.68 101 .13 19

.49 47 .14 7

.95 187 .08 27

.e4 .lo .45 2

-97 .m 3 7 e2 . . . . .. .- . 3 8 . 0 3 .09 <I .39 .m .09 2 .94.09 .44 <2 1.02 .07 .56 2

1.54 .lU -24 e2 . . . . . . . .- . 1.66 .04 .26 si 1.68 .04 .26 <2 .35 .07 .13 e2 .48 .08 .26 2

.82 .07 .51 e2

.91 .02 .09 2

.42 .02 .lo 3

.87 .07 .43 <2

.97 .oa .43 2

.62 .00 .28 3

.65 .06 .26 <2

.36 .04 .W 2 1.88 .06 .14 13

ppb

11 19 24 31 13

3 22 13 2 2

2 22 69 5 30

65 21300

2w 53 86

24 18 18 27 11

23 640 lOB0 1130 98

20 260 74

540

ICP - .500 GRAM SAMPLE IS DIGESTEO UlTH 3WL 3-1-2 HCL-HNOS-H2O AT 95 DEG. C FOR ONE lMUR AN0 IS DILUTED TO 10 ML UlTH WTER. T H I S LEACH IS PARTIAL FOR MN FE SR CA P LA CR WG BA TI B U AN0 LIMITED FOR NA K AN0 AL. ASSAY RELXWENOED FOR ROCK AND CORE S W L E S I F CU P 8 ZW AS > lX, AC > 30 PPM L AU D 1wO PPB - SAMPLE TVPE: CORE SaDles Imimiw 'RE' are Rerm and 'RRE' are R e i c t Rer-

A L T - ICNITEO, AQIJA-REGIA/MI8K EXTRACT, C F l M FIYISIIED.

DATE RECEIVED! JUY 23 1995 DATE REPORT MAILED: j-&/& SIQRBD BY.@.: f7.-. C.LEfflG, J.UANC; CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAYERS

Page 35: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

8 8 8 8 T 8T co E A 53 8 60 -1

GEOCBEUICAL ZL10AtYSIS CBRTIFICATE

310 Y i o . 1 Aw, Vancouver BC 6'1 2L9 minet Manaaement PROJ LE File # 95-1789

._._

44 , ECTDOW

, , , , , ____*I ,,

SAMPLE#

H95-1 16.2-17.7 H95-1 22.3-23.5 H95-1 35.1-36.4 1195-1 36.4-39Io H95-1 39.0-40.4

H95-1 40.4-41.8 1195-1 &%.a-u.8 . . . - . . . . - . . . - H95-1 50.9-53.3 H95-1 55.5-57.0 H95-2 15.9-17.4

RE H%-2 15.9-17.4 RRE H95I2 15.9-17.4 H95-2 31.7-32.3 H95-2 32.3-32.6 H95-2 40.8-43.3

H95-2 43.3-45.1 H95-2 48.8-50.6 H95-2 50.6-51.8 H95-3 6.7-7.3 H95-3 7.3-8.8

RE H95-3 7.3-8.8 RRE H95-3 7.3-8.8 H95-3 12.2-14.3 H95-3 14.3-16.5 H95-3 16.5-19.1

H95-3 19.1-21.0

STANDARD CIAU-R

no Cu Pb Zn Ag N i pn PPlRpppappa ppa

4 59 5 21 .4 158 63 633 8 52.2 206 14 88 4 11 .4 132 8 207 8 17 .3 213 4 148 3 1 .3 35

17 132 9 13 .5 123 3 53 <3 7 s.3 14 12 8 6 9 <.3 61 4 38 9 18 .3 239 6 160 11 61 .4 110

co m 28 86 207 32 24

23 4 31 17 27

- Mn

PPI

264 105 357 218 113

136 118 157 335 466

~

F e As U Au Th S r x PPnRnPPIRnAr

4.01 49 d <2 2 23 4.13 36 7 7 7 11 1.79 458 d <2 3 50 3.44 21 <5 <2 2 84 1.90 2 <5 <2 7 14

.92 2 e5 <2 6 11 1.06 83 <5 <2 3 16 3.53 40 s5 ~2 ~2 61 4.77 16 ~5 <2 2 77

1.92 40 <5 <2 6 33

cd Sb B i V Ca P L a C r Hg Bo T i B A t No F m p p a p p a ~ % X P P P P I %pa % P P I x x c.2 <2 <2 103 2.12 .lo7 6 86 2.57 18 .18 14 2.56 .03 1.2 <2 <2 18 1.02 .099 9 17 .20 8 .12 803 .18 .04 .3 Q 2 29 2.53 .086 4 27 .57 12 .14 1855 .54 .03

<.2 <2 c2 61 1.44 .OR 9 103 2.22 56 .20 73 1.89 .06 s.2 <2 2 6 1.00 .099 21 13 .22 7 .21 26 .13 .03

. -. .... .... . .. ... . .~. . ~ . <I <2 78 1.83 .OR 4 180 2.~2 22 .i7 398 2.23 .M c.2 <2 c2 100 1.42 .130 6 199 2.79 103 .16 547 2.03 .05

I: U W x p p l ppb

.23 c2 59

.05 49540

.05 <2 140

.64 <2 53

.Iu 3 13

c.2 <2 <2 36 .91 .007 17 38 .76 32 .20 14 .68 .07 .24 <2 8 c.2 <2 7 7 .93 .081) 22 11 .24 7 .16 14 .13 .OS .05 3 4

.& e2 L 271.99.095 6 61 .79 1 . 1 2 1729 .M .04 .03 Q 9 .17 e2 37 .09 2 8

5 156 7 60 .4 113 28 465 4.75 13 <5 ~2 2 76 .5 <2 *2 108 1.42 .125 6 201 2.79 W .15 541 2.00 .05 .W <2 16 5 153 13 60 .3 W 28 456 4.63 8 <5 <2 2 72 c.2 e2 <2 105 1.37 .I26 6 196 2.73 91 .15 534 1.99 .06 .00 <2 5 3 551 6 43 .3 91 42 545 5.89 126 <5 <2 2 47 .6 <2 <2 142 1.04 .I29 4 1W 2.64 53 .19 27 2.19 .05 1.00 <2 27 2 6453 22 4 1.6 lOW 3195 142 29.14 12947 <5 5 2 10 5.6 C2 4 24 .45 .027 2 25 .74 4 .03 20 .68 .01 .21 17 5640 21 106 4 4 .3 33 13 88 1.11 33 <5 *2 7 9 .8 <2 6 17 1.10 .W7 25 12 .17 13 .17 lW1 .ll .03 .06 3 27

20 235 7 6 <.3 57 40 107 1.91 72 <5 <2 8 9 <.2 c2 e2 18 .60 .098 28 13 .16 13 .18 37 .13 .04 .06 3 23 2 240 5 17 <.3 131 31 175 3.73 13 s5 <2 c2 36 <.2 g2 ~2 72 1.83 .lo0 3 59 1.44 55 .20 59 1.84 .05 .28 <2 4 2 106 s3 15 .3 377 25 237 4.15 60 <5 <2 <2 89 <.2 <2 c2 71 1.13 .059 2 133 3.87 11 1 .16 130 3.43 .16 1.88 <2 5 47 578 <3 39 .5 83 54 112 3.14 7 9 <2 5 12 1.1 <2 <2 21 .71 .112 65 22 .31 38.11 8 .24.01 .12 4 70 5 193 6 17 .4 74 39 181 2.86 28 g5 <2 4 23 .3 e2 e2 43 .77 .120 15 32 .73 40 .12 7 .68 .05 .11 *2 27

4 186 8 15 .3 77 44 196 2.83 38 d <2 4 23 s.2 c2 ~2 43 .77 .116 15 34 .R 36 .12 6 .66 .05 .11 Q 21 4 177 6 17 .3 76 44 202 2.% 37 <5 <2 4 24 <.2 e2 <2 45 .83 .I23 15 35 .75 33 .12 5 .69 .05 .11 2 31 16 200 3 11 .3 95 38 122 2.74 15 <5 <2 4 17 .4 <2 2 51 1.07 .110 17 44 .81 40 .14 785 .52 .04 .16 3 45 12 147 8 13 .4 69 22 179 2.87 11 <5 ~2 4 25 .9 <2 <2 46 1.40 .145 36 50 1.36 36 .13 16 .76 .05 .33 <2 17 18 974 5 32 .7 84 84 142 3.89 W 6 s2 3 24 .4 e2 3 21 3.23 .I88 39 26 .36 18 .11 6 .19 .04 .OS 4 77

7 359 7 15 .5 82 36 162 3.41 14 ~5 e2 3 62 s.2 <2 <2 70 .98 .119 8 54 1.23 35 .13 7 .79 .06 .29 2 8 7 556 4 82 .6 71 48 184 2.98 49 c5 <2 4 15 1.5 ~2 <2 35 1.58 .113 16 39 .65 29 .13 3 .36 .03 .IO <2 28 9 541 10 22 .7 62 41 177 4.20 11 d <2 3 31 .4 <2 <2 62 .74 .118 11 37 .79 40 .15 3 .64 .06 .23 5 6 18 61 40 120 7.7 75 28 1049 3.62 38 19 6 36 42 17.1 17 21 59 .47 .092 36 56 .88 161 .07 32 1.66 .05 .13 11 500

ICP - .500 GRAM SAMPLE IS DIGESTED UITH 3ML 3-1-2 HCL-HY03-H20 AT 95 DEG. C FOR ONE HWR AND IS DlLUTED TO 10 HL UlTH UATER. T H I S LEACH IS PARTIAL FOR MN FE SR CA P LA CR WC BA TI B U AND LIMITED FOR YA K AND AL. ASSAY R E M E N D E D FOR ROCK AND CORE SAMPLES I F CU PB ZW AS > 1%. AG D 30 PFW P AU > 1000 PPB - W P L E TYPE: M R E AU' AWALYSlS BY ACID LEACH/M FRCU 10 611 W P L E . S a t e s kaiming 'RE' are R e r m and 'RRE' are Reiect R e m ,

DATE RECEIVED: JUN 12 19% D A m REPORT ,6/4s' SIGNED .D.TOVE, C.LEONG, J.UANG; CERTlFlED B.C. ASSAVERS

Page 36: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

H95-3 100.6-103.0 5 167 13 28 <.3 83 27 179 2.01 50 e5 <2 2 37 .3 ~2 3 21 .78 .090 25 23 .20 61 .22 3 .31 .08 .10 e2 210 H95-3 103.0-104.9 5 419 7 10 2.4 131 158 168 3.59 861 7 4 2 14 .2 <2 <2 17 .75 .155 42 18 .I7 56 .19 e3 .18 -03 .10 4 7120 H95-3 106.9-107.2 4 153 8 6 <.3 52 28 228 1.57 67 d <2 2 16 e.2 <2 <2 23 .78 .lo5 20 22 .23 90 .23 3 .25 .06 .16 2 260 H95-3 107.2-108.7 7 113 8 7 <.3 53 15 178 1.81 7 e2 2 16 .2 3 2 19 .98 .OW 30 21 .10 M .19 0 .18 .02 .14 <2 27 H95-3 108.7-110.8 30 426 8 7 .6 90 29 142 3.15 5 4 <2 2 32 <.2 e2 2 18 2.69 231 30 16 .21 60 .19 0 .16 .03 .ll c2 19

H95-3 110.8-112.3 43 609 11 8 1.1 217 105 81 9.66 26 38 <2 4 23 .2 e2 <2 16 1.95 .222 25 12 .26 21 .14 a .13 -04 .04 2 72 1495-3 112.3-ii3.a 9 125 4 5 g.3 50 18 192 1.99 10 e5 <2 2 16 e.2 <2 s2 17 1.01 .108 17 21 .19 63 .18 e3 .21 .04 .12 4 7 H95-3 113.8-115.3 43 180 10 6 .4 68 65 111 3.18 67 18 <2 2 42 e.2 <2 3 13 2.71 .lo0 9 14 .20 38 .15 e3 .ll .02 .09 <2 68

H95-3 116.8-118.1 6 184 6 16 <.3 41 22 104 1.68 2 5 <2 2 16 .3 2 <2 10 1.34 .122 24 12 .18 49 .15 159 .14 .03 .11 <2 0 H95-3 118.1-119.6 2 69 4 29 g.3 319 31 364 3.68 16 <5 <2 <2 36 .3 <2 e2 78 .W .OS9 19 150 3.41 1W .22 4 2.17 .07 1.11 <2 7

H95-3 126.5-128.5 6 569 4 17 .4 216 37 487 5.62 41 19 <2 s2 47 .5 <2 <2 80 5.88 .062 30 388 4.47 100 .23 0 2.19 .04 1.39 <2 98 I H%-3 124.5-126.5 17 435 4 23 .3 231 43 360 4.30 49 14 e2 c2 36 .3 g2 2 53 1.89 .OS5 42 172 2.21 61 .21 3 1.46 .05 .54 s2 200

STANDARD CIAU-R I 19 57 39 125 6.7 74 32 1081 3.86 42 19 7 35 50 17.7 17 20 62 .52 .092 44 61 .91 17'9 .10 27 1.87 .06 .17 10 4W

ICP - .500 GRAM SWPLE IS DIGESTED UITH 3ML 3-1-2 HCL-HWJ3-HtO AT 95 DEG. C FOR CUE HOUR A M IS DILUTED TO 10 ML UITH UATER.

ASSAY RECWENOED FOR ROCK ANU CORE SAMPLES I F W PB ZW AS > 1%. AG > 30 PPM & AU > 1000 PPB - SANPLE TYPE: CORE AU' ANALYSIS BV ACID LEACHIAA FRW 10 611 SAMPLE.

T n i s LEACH IS PLRTIAL FOR MII FE SR u P LA CR l l ~ BA TI B Y AND LIMITED FOR YA K NID AL.

7

DATE RECEIVED: JUN 16 iws DATE REPORT D.TOVE, C.LEOIG, J.WWG; CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAVERS

Page 37: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

SAMPLE#

H95-1 12.2-16.2 H95-1 20.4-22.3 H95-2 32.6-33.7 H95-2 51.8-53.5 H95-3 28.3-30.2

H95-3 30.2-31.4

H95-3 32.6-34.1 H95-3 36.9-39.0 H95-3 39.0-40.2

1195-3 31.4-32.6

RE H95-3 39.0-40.2 RRE H95-3 39.0-40.2 H95-3 40.2-42.2 H95-3 44.2-46.3 H95-3 46.3-47.8

n95-3 47.8-49.4 H95-3 50.9-52.3 H95-3 54.3-55.5 H95-3 55.5-57.6 H95-3 57.6-59.4

H95-3 64.0-64.4 H95-3 64.4-66.9 RE H95-3 64.4-66.9 RRE H95-3 64.4-66.9 H95-3 68.3-69.3

H95-3 69.3-70.3 H95-3 73.2-74.7 H95-3 74.7-76.2 H95-3 76.2-77.7 H95-3 77.7-79.8

H95-3 79.8-80.8 H95-3 80.8-82.0 H95-3 82.0-83.5 H95-3 83.5-85.1 H95-3 85.1-86.6

H95-3 86.6-88.1 STAMOAFXI CIAU-R

~4 367

5 1208 4 5w 2 192 3 203 4 1%

4 192 3 185 3 210 7234

26 620

58 1404 20 272 4 232 3 135 7 104

49 1928 11 248 1 1 248 1 1 230 8 212

3 24 2 274 13 378 3 4 4 8 2 300

2 195 3 41 5 145 8 7 9 5 149

5 69

14 164 Cr 7 e.3 45 22 77 1.01 19 d Q 6 10 s.2 2 6 18 1.00 .lo1 12 12 -14 24 .14 582 .14 .03 .M Q 12 7 139 5 33 e.3 42 20 239 2.80 8 6 <2 3 28 1.1 2 <2 R 1.51 .111 11 32 .83 32 .19 894 1.24 .05 .15 <2 22 2 325 e3 21 .4 150 110 556 6.28 507 e5 <2 <2 14 <.2 *2 e2 123 .95 .lo2 8 131 2.48 55 .16 35 2.21 .M .27 <2 1140 50 320 e3 5 .3 91 43 86 2.65 70 4 <2 8 10 .6 2 e2 41 .56 .095 30 16 .09 22 .19 11 .14 .05 .Ob e2 10

s2 29 2.5 <2 e2 55 3.69 .114 5 38 1.07 34 .14 5 .85 .M .15 Q 20 17 in .5 60

26 105 2.2 77 4 46 .8 30 4 17 .4 33 3 19 .4 38 3 13 .3 33

4 11 <.3 35 <3 12 .3 29 4 16 q.3 89 7 18 .4 52

20 59 .9 74

26 213 1.4 56 38 46 .5 90 7 27 .4 37 e3 32 .3 97 <3 8 g.3 33

11 45 1.3 117 14 181 .5 314 13 186 .5 322 1s 186 .7 309 17 67 .4 77

<3 12 s.3 30 <3 27 .3 82 26 155 .6 96 15 102 .5 66 25 92 .4 77

11 90 .3 71 -3 13 <.3 47 6 16 .3 63 .. .. .. 7 10 s.3 44 6 51 .3 39

6 46 g.3 39

29

192 34 18 19 16

16 16 18 20 35

46 30 15 17 10

51 46 48 48 35

12 42 43 19 25

21 15 16 38 23

15

464 2.89 32 <5 <2

224 2.73 323 5 U 157 1.81 31 6 e2 141 1.85 10 ~5 <2 161 1.86 5 6 <2 93 1.71 4 d <2

112 1.73 7 4 e2 W 1.77 6 4 <2 135 2.69 s2 d e2 121 2.20 5 s5 <2 255 3.86 15 5 <2

in 4.64 16 7 ~2 1792.80 6 d e2 139 2.19 2 <5 ~2 226 2.29 2 <5 ~2 127 1.62 5 d s2

218 4.49 e 9 s2 315 3.85 51 5 <2 325 4.00 58 6 <2 306 3.84 56 6 g2 132 2.32 19 <5 <2

3 25 1.4 . Q <2 35.3.82 .Ow 11 W .74 21 .10 e3 A1 .04 .M 2 E60 3 14 1.0 2 <2 23 1.28 .OS5 6 30 .39 40 .12 e3 .26 .03 .06 2 140 3 16 <.2 g2 e2 26 1.38 .124 6 31 .47 36 .13 <3 .32 .03 .09 e2 17 3 12 .7 Q <2 13 1.04 .Ow 4 23 .18 36 .14 <3 .15 .05 .OS 2 13 4 17 e.2 4 2 26 .54 .086 15 29 .44 63 .12 Cr .38 .Ob .I7 2 4

4 17 .2 3 e2 27 .56 .087 16 30 .44 63 .12 Cr .38 .Ob .17 Q 3 4 19 c.2 <2 e2 27 .61 .W2 17 27 .44 65 .14 4 .39 .Ob .17 3 5 2 24 <.2 s2 <2 u1 .65 .lo3 9 57 .66 32 .13 4 .60 .05 .19 Q 9 3 14 .4 <2 G 2 41 .61 .129 8 47 .48 32 .12 Cr .39 .M .10 e2 5 3 29 <.2 3 s2 40 2.37 .084 37 97 .88 15 .ll 3 .77 .03 .05 3 14

3 13 2.5 2 <2 30 1.41 .083 32 54 .27 22 .10 <3 .24 .02 .Ob 4 19 3 12 .5 2 Q 58 .83 .Ow 6 91 .46 22 .08 <3 .35 .03 .07 <2 5 3 26 .6 2 <2 34 .77 .164 18 38 .64 38 .10 <3 .58 .07 .21 2 5 2 21 .9 s2 <2 39 .54 .Ob5 7 74 .92 44 .ll 20 .72 .06 .23 <2 5 4 57 e.2 e2 3 20 .64 .104 15 24 .36 67 .ll e3 .42..07 .13 <2 9

c2 23 <.2 e2 e2 26 1.34 .076 12 52 .71 23 .ll 9 .6O .05 .11 3 15 c2 55 2.7 8 <2 50 .92 .076 6 129 2.46 49 .14 g3 1.69 .05 .33 Q 76 c2 55 2.9 7 <2 53 .96 .078 6 136 2.53 48 .14 5 1.74 .05 .33 <2 110 ~2 52 1.7 11 s2 19 .91 .a72 5 124 2.34 42 .13 6 1.59 .05 .30 <2 130 3 23 1.0 3 s2 15 .(u1 .167 19 27 .17 42 .lo <3 .23 .05 .07 3 7

424 3.69 63 6 <2 331 2.54 24 <5 g2 441 3.97 2 4 g2

107 1.28 15 <5 e2 3 57 <.2 <2 4 43 .49 .049 11 53 .81 67 .I5 e3 .7J -08 -31 <2 4

<2 22 1.5 3 <2 57 1.70 .125 8 72 1.13 28 .18 3 1.20 .05 .(4 <2 350 261 4.15 39 <5 ~2 <2 34 .7 <2 <2 78 1.62 .123 5 37 1.11 32 .23 3 1.70 .05 .16 <2 20

2 18 .6 6 e2 53 .92 .116 7 77 1.00 32 .18 26 .92 .05 .14 2 22 c2 37 1.2 <2 <2 90 1.26 .115 6 37 1.19 57 .22 44 1.45 .06 .19 <2 9

497 3.61 2 4 e2 123 .86 38 <5 <2 116 1.57 14 <5 s2 103 .97 84 <5 e2 103 1.25 32 <5 s2

c2 22 2.5 <2 <2 89 1.47 .121 4 27 1.10 32 2 2 12 1.40 .05 .14 e2 6 4 11 .6 3 5 26 1.01 .lo3 15 36 .39 18 .13 474 .30 -03 .06 2 5 3 17 .9 3 3 27 .72 .lo5 15 25 .27 32 .14 25 .39 .Os .08 <2 3 3 15 .3 2 6 17 2.28 .110 15 16 .26 34 .14 9 .17 .03 .08 <2 15 3 19 .7 2 <2 54 1.62 .M10 13 64 .36 42 .14 142 .38 .02 .10 <2 3

150 1.34 16 5 ~2 2 14 .5 <2 4 44 .83 .Ob7 9 38 .43 u1 .12 <3 .38 .M .13 Q 5 17 67 37 122 7.8 61 28 1040 3.66 40 17 7 38 47 17.6 16 18 57 .45 .089 37 57 A6 167 .07 28 1.80 .Ob .15 11 530

ICP - .500 GRAM SMPLE IS OlGESlED UllH Y I L 3-1-2 HCL-HN03-HN) AT 95 DEG. C FDR WE HOUR AND IS DILUTED TO 10 ML UllH UATER. THIS LEACH IS PARTIAL FOR IM FE SR CA P LA CR MG BA 11 B U AND LIMITED FOR NA K AUO AL. ASSAY REUIWEWED FOR ROCK AND CORE W L E S I F CU PB UI AS > 1%. AG > 30 PPI4 L AU > lo00 PPB - SMPLE TYPE: CORE S m l e s bea imirm 'RE' are Rerulo and 'RRE' a r e R e i r t Rerme.

W ANALYSIS BY ACID LEACH/M FRCU 10 a SMPLE.

DATE RECEIVED: JWI 12 1995 DATE REPORT IUILSD: ,6/& SIQkIED D.lDYE, C.LEOYG, J.YAY6; CERTIFIEO B.C. ASSAVERS

Page 38: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

Quinet Management PROJECT DOUBLE CREEK FILE # 95-1790

SMPLEY

H95-3 88.1-89.6

Mo Cu P b I n Ag Y i Co Mn Fe As U AU l h Er Cd Sb B i V Ca P l o C r Mg Bo T i B A 1 No K Y Au"

3 231 9 23 .4 54 16 286 3.17 9 s5 C? 2 30 1.6 Q C? 78 .M .C58 8 39 1.34 61) .14 3 1.06 .06 .57 *2 6

FmPwPwwFvFv xpplFmwpplpplpPwFvw x XwPP x p P xppn x x x w w

H95-3 89.6-91.7 H95-3 91.7-93.0 ti%-3 93.0-94.0 H95-3 94.0-95.5

H95-3 95.7-97.5 I 6 288 8 10 .8 62 44 137 2.31 U 4 e2 3 11 .4 <2 4 16 .O .122 16 16 .14 63 .14 4 .I6 .03 .10 e2 2170 u s - 3 97.5-99.1 7 313 12 15 1.7 107 Y) 103 3.56 63 6 <2 3 16 -3 <2 2 15 -59 -101 16 16 -13 M -11 3 -23 .O& -10 s2 3430

10 233 13 19 .5 52 17 226 2.74 10 4 Q 2 26 .5 Q 4 177 1.15 .OS9 5 85 1.17 45 .14 4 .87 -05 .43 s2 13 27 308 13 9 .6 83 23 181 3.22 13 4 <2 4 28 1.0 Q 3 158 1.29 .094 17 100 .88 42 .13 0 .65 .04 .35 Q 9 13 4L16 11 7 .8 53 104 137 1.83 173 4 C? 4 16 s.2 <2 5 18 1.54 .OM 10 19 .21 39 .14 J .18 .03 .09 Q 110 51 871 24 7 1.1 121 46 140 5.25 23 6 <2 4 14 2.7 Q 5 17 1.38 .095 14 16 .16 46 .13 0 .16 .03 .09 2 23

. . . . . . . . . . . . . RE H95-3 97.5-W.l H95-3 99.1-100.6 STAYOARO GIN-R

SmLe tm: CORE. S m m L n h i m im 'RE' are R erum and W E ' ore Reiect Rerum,

. . . . . - . . . . . . . . . .. - . . . .. - . . . .. - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- . . . . . - . - . . . . . . - - 7 308 11 13 1.6 110 m 116 3.67 76 <5 ~2 3 17 s.2 Q s2 15 .63 .lo5 15 16 .14 61 .12 J .24 .Os .lo 2 3680

13 293 4 7 .9 109 118 178 2.86 247 d <2 3 68 s.2 2 *2 23 .90 .082 16 28 .35 75 -13 3 .46 .06 .I7 2 1140 17 65 35 129 7.8 64 27 1044 3.711 40 18 6 28 41 18.2 15 19 56 .44 .OM 35 50 .80 166 .07 29 1.66 .06 .14 13 450

Page 39: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

Guinet Haanaaement PROJECT DOUBLE F i l e # 95-2049 . > 310 wigel Ave, V-r 8c'%%

TR95-3-1 TR95-3-2 TR95-3-3 TR95-3-4 TR95-3-5

23 2W 14 26 A 52 22 159 3.15 2 15 Q 5 13 .4 e2 Q 271 .M .041 20 73 .70 62 .24 61) .(uI -05 .26 <2 7 4 1231 3 27 .6 163 114 UK) 13.42 34 7 Q 2 21 .7 c2 Q 140 .73 .093 6 11 1.19 31 .28 Q 1.70 .03 .U Q 1520 3 486 10 18 .4 34 9 153 14.20 3 14 2 2 24 .5 Q e2 145 .57 .W1 3 135 .97 111 .33 Q 1.29 .04 .47 Q 2600 3 1014 6 8 .8 37 11 103 10.08 6 8 13 Q 16 .3 s2 5 125 -23 .Om 3 169 1.06 71 .U Q 1.08 .03 .71 e2 14260 2 220 12 42 .3 31 10 376 4.43 3 e5 e2 2 51 .4 <2 <2 215 2.04 232 12 54 1.87 61 .28 7 2.25 .03 .19 <2 550

TW5-3-6 5 231 8 M .3 32 18 261 4.41 2 d <2 2 37 <.2 Q e2 129 1.69 -176 11 43 .E4 12 -24 6 1.43 -05 .I1 Q 85 TR95-4-1 7 346 6 22 s.3 27 20 83 3.15 Q 9 Q 4 18 .4 <2 <2 166 .23 .OU 11 82 .76 126 .26 Q .93 .05 -62 Q 90

TR95-4-3 2 420 5 24 .3 244 49 193 6.06 19 e5 e2 <2 55 .5 <2 <2 105 .74 .W2 4 235 3.11 192 3 5 Q 2.37 .OE .M s2 36 TR95-4-2 3 812 4 40 <.3 221 77 1% 7.23 4 7 e2 2 25 .5 e2 e2 90 .57 .055 4 333 3.15 74 .a 2.40 .E 1 . a Q 210

RRE TR95-4-3 TR95-4-4 lR95-4-5 TR95-5-1

RE TRR-4-3 I 2 435 4 23 g.3 250 51 192 6.20 22 4 *2 Q 55 .b e2 s2 107 .74 .094 4 239 3.17 188 .35 0 2.41 .08 .Lw Q 42

2 390 3 22 c.3 250 49 186 6.08 20 <5 <2 <2 52 .2 <2 <2 103 .70 .093 4 235 3.10 187 .34 Q 2.34 .07 3 7 ~2 33 6 709 4 37 <.3 52 22 143 10.04 <2 <5 e2 3 16 .4 <2 <2 86 .21 .OS3 14 63 .52 103 -21 a .R .03 .47 e2 1450 5 670 4 15 <.3 39 22 110 4.35 <2 8 e2 5 31 .2 e2 <2 107 .20 .028 16 70 1.04 140 .27 0 1.33 .06 1.00 si? 28 2 1251 4 287 1.3 220 48 396 6.64 74 <5 <2 3 32 1.5 3 2 78 6.30 .OS7 16 95 2.42 40 .19 e3 1.56 .03 .24 '2 120

TR95-5-2

TR95-5-3 TR95-5-4 STANDARD C/AU-R

2 677 3 106 1.3 289 77 519 8.49 139 <5 Q <2 35 .7 g2 <2 89 6.20 . O S 24 212 3.84 59 .18 4 2.05 .03 .27 <2 120

4 787 4 106 1.1 237 118 0 1 8.75 185 <5 <2 2 13 1.1 <2 <2 149 .89 .076 173473.82 49 .20 Q 2.87 .04 .15 Q 95 2 28392 5 318 15.8 1238 161 539 26.11 9 0 <2 <2 76 3.6 <2 <Z 3 17.83 . O H 120 8 .14 5c.01 Q .13<.01 s.01 G? 1240

20 63 39 131 7.8 73 33 1020 4.19 40 25 7 38 51 19.0 17 16 62 .53 .OW 45 60 .94 175 .09 30 1.96 .06 .16 10 520

Page 40: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

H95-5 50.7-52.3 H95-5 52.3-53.8 H95-5 53.8-55.8 H95-5 55.8-57.3 H95-5 57.3-58.8

H95-5 58.8-61.6 H95-5 64.2-64.6 H95-5 67.4-69.0 H95-5 79.6-80.5 H95-5 81.5-82.8

H95-5 83.5-85.2 H95-5 89.3-91.3 H95-5 91 3-93.4 H95-5 93.4-94.7 ~ 9 5 - 5 94.7-96.2

H95-5 W.2-97.7 RE H95-5 96.2-97.7 RRE H95-5 96.2-97.7 H 9 5 - 5 97.7-98.7 H95-5 98.7-101.3

H95-5 101.3-103.5 H95-5 103.5-104.5 H95-5 110.6-112.1 H95-6 18.8-20.3 H95-6 20.3-21.3

H95-6 25.2-27.1 H95-6 27.1-28.6 H95-6 28.6-30.1 RE H95-6 28.6-30.1 RRE H95-6 28.6-30.1

H95-6 30.1-31.6 H95-6 31.6-33.4 H95-6 33.4-35.4 HE-6 35.4-36.7 H95-6 36.7-3.5.7

H95-6 38.7-40.7 H95-6 40.7-42.7 STANDARD CIAU-R

CEBFIPICAT

Ma Cu Pb Zn M Y i Co Ih Fe As U Au Th sr Cd sb B i V Ce P LO Cr 4 88 T i B A I YO K Y A@ P a p p l l P P P P l R n p p n F P P P ~ ~ ~ p p n p p n p P ~ F F F m ~ x X W W %PI= X W % x xpPm 9 187 9 20 1.3 106 10 196 3.06 735 5 4 6 37 5.1 7 7 26 1.96 .143 33 30 .37 33 .12 13 .35 .04 .W 6 3410 5 156 11 31 <.3 72 52 212 2.71 W c5 c2 4 37 2.5 4 4 54 .W .119 23 42 -89 06 .17 3 .M . lo .Lo 2 60 8 159 14 40 <.3 75 22 211 2.95 33 e5 Q 4 38 1.4 2 4 % .74 .096 13 57 1.02 76 .17 J .97 .11 -52 2 6

18 157 8 16 .6 49 252 143 1.98 kW 9 Q 2 29 .5 2 2 54 2.70 .OW 43 U .41 39 .13 J .33 .02 .13 Q 21 11 857 7 43 .6 49 270 128 2.55 b39 c5 c2 ~2 18 .8 2 3 27 1.15 .I70 39 34 .34 61 .13 3 .33 .03 .18 Q 37

6 182 11 24 .3 47 U 176 2.47 61 4 g2 3 24 .6 Q. 4 55 1.56 .140 14 36 .77 64 .15 J .61 .05 .32 Q 5 3 305 10 57 <.3 61 24 151 2.W 14 4 Q Q 32 .8 <2 2 29 2.26 .128 22 24 .57 48 .15 Q .43 .04 .26 Q 5 11 261 5 228 .6 70 45 131 2.54 48 d <2 3 21 2.4 c2 Q 30 1.38 .lo5 9 20 .38 39 .14 24 .34 .04 .15 Q 350 2 306 6 2V <.3 216 26 149 3.86 6 <5 <2 <2 34 1.2 <2 3 87 3.05 .Wl 1 101 2.19 54 .20 6 2.75 .03 .40 Q 130 2 219 14 34 c.3 144 32 148 3.27 4 <5 c2 ~2 26 1.0 c2 2 31 1.68 .057 3 62 1.42 98 .13 10 1.39 .04 .M <2 12

3 116 3 19 C.3 310 27 187 4.110 11 d Q Q 2b 1.0 <2 2 77 1.30 .062 2 201 3.37 117 .20 J 2.46 .05 1.54 Q 16 2 96 6 15 <.3 198 41 189 4.17 3.5 <5 <2 Q 27 1.4 <2 2 49 2.14 .055 25 175 1.71 64 .15 Q 1.06 .04 .51 Q 60 25 211 6 22 g.3 98 21 152 3.30 7 <5 <2 <2 25 .6 s2 2 49 1.69 .082 31 95 1.33 36 .17 J .92 .05 .19 Q 43 17 398 4 31 <.3 75 17 106 2.26 6 d c2 <2 33 .8 <2 2 17 2.42 .059 4 22 .61 43 .ll Q .33 -02 .11 c2 9 20 983 9 45 .3 166 48 97 5.70 10 <5 <2 <2 27 1.2 3 4 26 2.00 .076 13 45 .53 37 .13 C3 .30 .03 .10 c2 15

11 308 9 24 <.3 88 28 121 3.53 5 d Q <2 21 .6 2 Q 37 1.45 .104 28 53 .72 33 .16 J .51 .04 .13 Q 21 11 295 9 21 <.3 86 27 128 3.44 5 4 <2 ~2 20 .9 2 3 35 1.40 .lo2 28 50 .70 32 .15 J .49 .04 .13 <2 28 11 308 7 22 <.3 89 28 137 3.55 5 e5 <2 '2 25 1.1 2 4 37 1.47 .lo6 29 54 .73 34 .16 4 .51 .04 .13 ~2 29 7 167 9 18 <.3 153 24 151 3.10 29 <5 <2 <2 30 .4 <2 3 52 1.01 .083 15 89 1.68 61 .20 c3 1.26 .06 .46 <2 85 8 206 7 23 <.3 164 42 300 4.96 23 <5 <2 <2 32 1.0 2 3 73 1.33 .OS9 3 241 2.79 50 2 0 J 2.15 .05 .48 s2 260

22 345 9 9 <.3 84 31 97 3.24 13 <5 Q <2 33 .6 2 3 10 2.41 .119 33 34 .Lo 37 .17 <I .31 .05 .12 <2 83 6 600 42 135 <.3 32 14 317 2.64 4 g5 c2 c2 26 1.5 2 3 79 1.71 .109 37 14 .84 28 .17 J .95 -05 .10 Q 60 2 79 11 27 <.3 09 15 147 2.49 16 <5 c2 3 29 c.2 ~2 3 73 .79 .094 22 42 .96 82 .22 Q .98 .W .68 <2 47 2 173 9 78 <.3 43 17 338 5.02 <2 <5 <2 <2 35 1.9 s2 2 111 3.08 .087 2 37 2.18 35 .22 3 2.68 .03 .14 c2 6 15 230 13 50 g.3 49 19 195 5.26 <2 <5 c2 3 15 .7 3 4 414 1.08 .OB2 11 83 1.69 58 .26 J 1.44 .07 3 2 <2 7

5 145 5 18 c.3 62 16 178 4.24 9 d <2 2 33 .8 C2 2 202 1.11 .0?6 3 (10 1.56 08 2 0 J l.R .07 .67 <2 6 8 226 9 17 <.3 51 18 153 4.63 2 4 C2 3 172 .8 <2 4 338 .59 .065 6 97 1.49 78 .20 C3 1.77 .12 1.25 4 10 8 242 7 18 <.3 48 22 118 4.86 4 4 c2 3 94 1.0 3 3 312 .54 .069 5 84 1.51 71 .21 J 1.66 .ll 1.17 c2 7 9 242 8 17 g.3 09 22 116 4.06 6 <5 Q 3 94 .7 4 6 314 .52 .070 5 86 1.51 70 .21 c3 1.67 .I2 1.20 s2 6 8 245 10 17 c.3 48 22 113 4.86 2 <5 <2 3 94 1.1 3 3 313 .51 .070 4 82 1.51 68 2 0 4 1.65 .ll 1.18 <2 5

5 249 7 26 <.3 48 19 151 4.75 2 ~5 ~2 4 26 -6 2 2 173 .56 .OW 9 69 1.50 82 . tl J 1.47 .W .70 Q 1 16 219 9 22 s.3 49 19 164 4.58 12 <5 <2 3 24 .8 2 3 2 0 .59 .065 6 53 1.53 81 .18 Q 1.50 .08 .70 <2 2 10 261 12 22 <.3 60 23 185 5.35 3 <5 <2 4 20 .9 2 4 232 .82 .080 8 69 1.62 66 .21 c3 1.48 .07 .48 <2 3 4 231 6 37 g.3 174 32 310 5.74 11 Q ~2 <2 30 1.1 Q Q 157 1.19 -086 cl 84 2.74 39 2 0 c3 2.38 .07 .23 Q 3 1 176 8 46 c.3 35 18 301 5.38 ~2 <5 ~2 c2 30 .7 2 3 142 1.51 .130 4 1 1 1.56 28 .19 C3 2.12 .06 .19 <2 3

1 152 7 31 <.3 141 31 320 4.81 64 e5 <2 <2 73 1.2 Q 3 108 2.45 .lo6 4 61 2.28 27 .18 J 2.39 .05 .15 ~2 5 1 32 3 40 c.3 16 10 380 3.38 10 <5 c2 c2 52 .6 c2 c2 126 3.17 .145 2 4 1.29 24 .18 10 2.67 .06 .16 c2 3 19 63 41 127 6.6 73 32 1030 4.03 40 18 7 37 52 18.5 18 19 65 .52 .W2 42 55 .92 179 .08 27 1.93 .06 .16 9 540

ICP - .SO0 GFSN S I R L E IS DIGESTED Y l T H 3ML 3-1-2 HCL-HY03-H20 AT 95 DEG. C FOR ONE HOUR AND IS DILUTED TO 10 YL UlTH UATER. T H I S LEACH IS PARTIAL FOR MY FE SR U P LA CR MG BA T I B Y AND LIMITED FOR NA K AND AL. ASSAY REmmEllDED FOR RCCK AND CORE *LEE I F CU PB 2N - SMPLE TYPE: P l TD P2 l 2 X E P3 ROCK W - IGNITED, SanDles benimilw 'RE' are R p ~ n s ad 'RRE' a r d e

DATE RECEIVED: JIM 28 1995 DATE REPORT NAILED: C.LEONG, J . W G ; CERTIFIED B.C. ASSAYERS

v I

Page 41: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

Guinet Management PROJECT DOUBLE CREEK FILE # 95-2009 Page 2 QQ

H95-6 42.7-44.2 H95-6 44.2-45.7 H95-6 45.7-47.2 H95-6 47.2-69.2 H95-6 49.2-51.2

H95-6 51.2-52.7 H95-6 52.7-54.2 H95-6 54.2-56.5 H95-6 56.5-59.1 RE H95-6 56.5-59.1

RRE U95-6 56.5-59.1 H95-6 59.1-61.6 H95-6 61.6-63.1 H95-6 69.6-71.3 H95-6 76.2-78.0

H95-6 78.0-79.6 H%-6 82.0-83.2 H95-6 99.2-100.9 H%-6 100.9-102.6 H95-6 102.6-104.5

H95-6 104.5-106.7 W5-6 106.7-108.8 RE H95-6 106.7-108.8 RRE H95-6 106.7-108.8 STANDARD CIW-R

0. -"Ira

Mo cu Pb Zn Ag U i co Mn Fe lis u AU rh sr Cd Sb B i v Ca P La cr Hg Ba T i B A1 Na K M A @

3 61 0 36 g.3 22 9 489 4.15 12 <5 <2 4 33 1.3 ~2 5 161 3.09 .147 3 5 1.65 24 .19 15 2.73 .06 .15 2 6 14 189 7 28 .3 63 15 Z93 4.83 8 d c2 4 87 2.6 2 7 251 1.54 .OB9 6 M 1.92 65 .18 6 1.95 .07 .29 3 5 12 621 0 71 s.3 66 38 378 6.76 12 <5 Q 3 18 1.3 3 7 103 1.29 .137 12 u) 1.20 30 .20 0 1.43 -05 .ll <2 5 16 154 0 8 e.3 106 15 113 3.49 22 d Q 2 225 .6 <2 5 320 1.63 .OS7 5 97 1.93 97 .17 Q 1.93 .14 .E1 <2 4 18 206 5 19 4 49 14 109 3.97 7 <5 c2 3 110 .5 <2 4 360 .W .058 4 79 1.36 1111 .18 4 1.62 .17 .W <2 3

1ppmppllFPFPFmFPlw ~ F m f f r n ~ p p D F m p p l w P P F P x X P P W X p p l X P P x X XPPW

15 250 7 27 e.3 242 30 181 4.42 29 d <2 3 58 .3 4 160 5 24 g.3 180 24 338 4.31 26 6 <2 <2 36 .3

20 222 4 17 s.3 51 10 63 4.14 29 s5 '2 2 250 c.2 23 197 J 15 s.3 58 10 100 3.49 28 4 Q 2 177 c.2 23 215 7 16 g.3 61 10 104 3.74 31 <5 <2 2 189 <.2

18 330 4 132 s.3 34 6 214 2.46 <2 4 <2 3 34 .9 12 260 4 12 4 58 12 93 4.83 43 <5 <2 2 19 c.2 25 931 4 24 .3 84 13 203 3.93 6 <5 <2 2 34 <.2 9 262 8 45 <.3 165 22 11111 3.99 19 <5 <2 2 25 <.2

22 179 0 23 s.3 54 18 118 2.W 26 e5 <2 2 23 <.2 35 58 4 440 e.3 103 38 202 3.40 73 <5 <2 <2 26 1.7 16 217 <3 4 <.3 45 10 154 3.74 <2 ~5 <2 '2 35 <.2 12 501 4 34 C.3 43 28 180 5.32 8 c5 <2 2 46 .5 13 336 <3 32 g.3 44 16 154 4.32 8 <5 <2 ~2 93 .3

1 316 4 30 <.3 46 18 271 6.13 6 4 c2 <2 17 .7 18 147 6 118 4 61 18 519 3.62 28 c5 c2 4 54 1.9 18 165 <3 116 g.3 61 20 519 3.95 27 <5 <2 5 53 1.6 18 158 4 115 c.3 60 18 513 3.87 25 <5 <2 6 52 1.9 17 58 41 120 6.5 74 28 1099 3.64 39 20 7 37 50 18.0

22 200 0 16 <.3 57 10 100 3.61 27 <5 Q 2 184 s.2

Samle tm: CORE. Smles beqirninq 'RE' are Reruns and 'RRE' are Reiect Reruns.

3 314 1.16 .W 6 133 1.32 .081 5 389 .67 .063 6 339 1.35 .059 2 355 1.35 .063

3 90 2.42 58 .18 5 1.93 .12 .a5 Q 5 el 91 2.30 30 .19 Q 1.86 .05 .13 Q 5 7 71 1.24 79 .I9 3 1.39 .10 -55 <2 5 5 M 1.19 64 -18 3 1.23 .07 .42 Q 4 6 60 1.27 65 -18 4 1.30 .08 .45 <2 5

5 59 1.22 63 .17 Q 1.25 .07 .43 Q 5 2 54 1.30 30 .15 J 1.19 .OS .16 G! 3

4 341 1.29 .061 3 193 3.35 .IN9 4 307 .82 .092 6 68 1.45 32 -21 0 1.37 .06 .13 c2 4 5 366 1.15 .078 12 95 1.59 32 .20 5 1.14 .OS .13 <2 23 4 181 1.66 .078 5 124 2.40 17 .23 5 1.42 .03 .OB <2 4

5 275 1.01 .a 11 7s 1.12 86 .a 5 .m .02 .37 Q 5

5 375 .60 .ME 5 95 .94 106 .21 4 .97 .07 .a <Z 5 5 195 .m .089 11 39 1.18 m .i9 <3 1.14 .os .67 <2 5

3 275 2.07 .074 11 (18 1.80 63 .23 8 1.29 .02 .53 <2 10

3 255 1.17 .058 8 63 1.00 74 .16 4 1.01 .07 .42 <2 4

5 169 .57 .DE4 4 281 6.31 .OR 4 284 6.12 .074 3 278 6.05 .073

20 56 .42 .OS1

2 15 1.81 75 .a 0 1.71 .M .n 4 6 43 1.56 63 .16 J .98 .02 .41 Q 3 6 43 1.67 66 .17 0 1.07 .02 .45 <2 4 6 41 1.65 64 .16 4 1.05 .02 .43 <2 4

42 55 .80 186 .07 28 1.84 .06 .13 10 480

Page 42: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

J Guinet Management PROJECT DOUBLE CREEK F I L E # 95-2009

RlOI)-98+75 T M - 1 - 1 TR9S-2-1 RE TR95-2-1

2 93 13 11 <.3 32 14 181 3.28 7 4 Q 6 17 ,9 c2 4 46 .62 .181 24 41 .53 52 .U Q .65 .03 .16 Q I)o 6 130 48 51 <.3 41 12 ~W74.00 3 <S Q 3 1b 1.9 U 4 W .29 .075 12 39 1.49 57 .17 Q 1.57 .W .17 U 11 6 4R 12 26 <.3 59 57 114 4.61 19 <5 <2 4 ?9 1.2 <2 4 159 .37 .071 10 72 .51 54 .19 Q .Iu .OS -20 Q 19 6 469 12 26 <.3 57 56 103 4.56 17 6 <2 4 78 1.2 Q 4 151) .36 .Om 10 72 .SO 53 .la Q .M .OS .20 e2 I?

Page 43: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

,

Page 44: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

1 23 209 IC 26 .4 52 22 159 3.15 2 15 3 S 13 .4 Q <2 271 -38 .Os1 W 73 -70 ba .a .E .M Q 7 a

3 4% 10 18 .b 36 9 153 14 . a . 3 14 2 2 X .5 e Q 14.5 .57 -091 3 IS5 .97 1 B 1.29 -06 A7 <2 2680 + 4 1231 3 27 -6 163 114 280 13.42 36 7 U 2 21 .7 Q e (40 .73 -093 6 61 1.49 1.70 .a3 .22 Q 1520

5 231 8 38 3 32 18 241 4.41 2 4 <2 2 37 <,.? Q c2 129 1.69 .3Tb 11 (3 .a4 42 .24 6 7.43 -35 .14 G 85 7 346 6 22 <-3 27 20 83 3.15 Q 9 s2 4 18 .6 <2 <2 166 .23 .a 11 82 .?5 126 -26 4 .93 .US .62 c2 PB 2 420 I 26 - 3 244 49 193 6.W 19 d Q Q 55 .5 G? <2 105 .R -092 6 235 3.11 1P2 -35 4 2.3? .OS .a e2 36 2 435 4 23 *.3 M 51 192 6.20 22 -5 -2 U 55 .6 <2 e 807 -74 .W 4 239 3.17 188 -35 '3 2.41 .Q8 .89 Q 42

3 812 e 40 4 221 n 195 7.23 4 7 ~2 2 25 -5. <z <2 98 -57 .055 L u3 3.45 1 4 .a 42.40 .OJ 1-21 g2 21a

a+. RUE lR%-4-3 z 390 3 22 c.3 250 49 186 6.m 20 qs ~2 <2 Y .2 Q Q im .m .am A as 5.m tm .3a a 2.s .m .a7 <2

L. lR95-5-2

r m - 5 - 3 R95-5-4

! SlaNbARO UMI-I

2 677 3 I06 1.3 289 77 519 8.49 139 4 q2 =2 35 .? e 2 ~2 8?, 6.20 .054 24 212 3.84 59 .18 <3 2.05 .03 .27 ~2 120

4 *17 4 106 1.1 237 118 801 8.75 185 <5 '2 2 13 1.1 s2 169 .89 .076 17347SSZ 49 .m G 2.87 .04 .:5 <2 p.j 2 28392 I 3 1 8 15.8 1238 161 539 26.11 9 &3 + Q 76 3.6 Q 3 3 19.83 .D11 120 8 -14 5c.91 d .13<.0l q.01 C! 1240 20 63 39 131 Z.8 73 53 1020 4.19 40 25 7 38 51 19.0 1Z t6 &2 .53 .a38 45 6Q .pS 175 ,09 30 I .% .W .I6 13 520

ICP ~ .500 GRu( SARLE I S DlGESlRI UITH UB 3-1-2 IIC1-IIR(U-I20 111 95 DEt. C FOR WE H W R AND I S DILUTED 10 I O OL L j l l H WlEB. m t s LEACH IS PMTIIL: TOR )I* FE SR C A P u CR MG SA 11 B u AND LIMIIW FOR na 1: AND RL. AS&T RECWEYDED HR ROW AB) CORE WIPLCS IF CU PB ZW AS > t X , Lt . M P L E %%: RSXK S m \ e s besitmire 'RE' we R e r w snd 'I&E' arc Reject Rerms-

30 FTW 6 W > 1000 PPB W - IGNITED, &Xlh-REGlWHlBK E X l R A C l . GtIM FINISlIED.

, P DATZ RECEJlJEDI JUn 30 1995 DATE REPORT I 1 R l X B D t .D.lO?€, C.LEoIIc. J.vil6: CERllFIgD B.C. ASSAVERS

Page 45: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

2 R 13 11 <3 21 U la1 3-26 7 d Q b 17 .V Q b 46 .(u .l81 24 b l -53 32 2 2 Ci .65 .03 .16 Q 100 6 130 a 51 c.3 b1 12 60474.00 3 d Q 3 l4 1.9 Q L pd 29 -971 12 W1.W 57 .I? <3 7.57 .W .I7 Q 11 6 4?7 12 26 c.3 59 n 1lL 4-41 19 d U b 79 'l.2 Q b 1s .3? .Wl 10 72 S1 W -19 J .E2 .05 .R Q 19 4 469 12 26 s.3 57 Y lO96-56 I? c5 Q 5 ?8 1.2 Q b l% .36-1)0 10 72 .SO I) .P 4 -80 -05 20 Q 17

Page 46: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX II

CORE LOGS BY R.YORSTON, B.SC.

Page 47: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 48: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 49: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

bav0L IL C e C c '

COEIPANY: I LUti.I PROJECT M U :\ DATE: -_-- LOCATION H6CSh FLY

FROEI TO LITHOLOGY

, 0 3.7 S n . S i r \ Q >

Page 50: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I - - - - = = = = = = = = =- -

Page 51: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

DIUIOND DRILL CORB DESCRIPTIONS

LOGGED BY: HOLE NO: ~ b h 45-3 I COtIPANY: DATE: L o c . :

LENCTlI PROJECT

LOCATION BLEV: , AZIMUTH LU RECOVERY LITIIOLOCY I DESCRIPTION I S O , L p C ( ~ D L s 1 /=lL-rEan*oE.l

I

Page 52: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

DIAMOND DRILL CORE DESCRIPTIONS

LOGGED BY: HOLE NO: D ~ H 95-3 DATE: LOC. 1

CORE S I Z E LENGTH

I H - '4-

Page 53: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 54: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

HOLE NO: OOH 45-3

43.0 9 8 . 8 I

=/= 4g.g l 0 t . l E$/

Page 55: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 56: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I

PROJECT

LOCATION

~

COMPANY: Lot.: LENCTll

- DATE:

CORE S I Z E ELEV: . AZIMUTH D I P

i I HOLE NO: D D ~ \ q5 - 3 -- LOGGED BY:

Page 57: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 58: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I HOLE NO: DDtk 9 5 -4 LOGGED BY:

Page 59: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 60: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 61: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

LOGGED BY: HOLE NO: DDH 45-

DATE: CORE SIZE

COMPANY: - - LENGTH

AZIM

PROJECT

LOCATION 7

ELEV: FRON LITllOLOGY DESCRIPTION I s ~ L P H ~ K S I fiLcuATIa4 RECOVERY 7

I

I I I I ~ I I I 1-1

Page 62: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I-

-

86

Page 63: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 64: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 65: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 66: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 67: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 68: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

LOGGED BY: 1 HOLE NO: Q ~ H 45-6 I ,*1 .D. ,ne . COEPANY :

I Y ' L I I l i YV" . i 1 PROJECT 1 n..n"..*

-1 CORE SIZE I Irc.'""L'' I LOCATION

RECOVERY

F+

Page 69: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

I I I I I I I I I I I - -

Page 70: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

COWANY : LOGGED BY:

PROJECT DATE: c-CORE SIZE

HOLE NO: bbd 75-6 LOC , : LENCTll

--

Page 71: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995
Page 72: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

FIELD AND LABORATORY METHODS I I I I I

Rock samoles

These were taken as half-spl~ts of NQ s m drdlcorc or as represatatwe small chps across the stated length of the trench These vaned 6om 2-5 kg m sue, placed m plastlc bags and marked wth an appropnate number

Rock samples were assayed m dupllcate by FIR Assay method A separate split was analysed for 30 elements by ICP methods All analyses were done by Acme Analytical Laboratory, Vancouver, B C

I I

I I I I I

Page 73: British Columbia ASSESSMENT REPORTS I DATE OCT I995

~

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

APPENDIX III

ITEMIZED COST STATEMENT

Hen Claims - 1995 Work Pronram

R.Yorston, Geologist, 35 days V.Guinet, assistant, 40 days R.Mickle, Excavator operator H.Allen Diamond Drilling, and cat time Assays, Acme analytical Camp rental, V.Guinet Vehicle, 4x4 truck, V.Guiinet D.Bailey, Geol Consultant Expenses, as attached B.Price, Geological report DCM Management, 1OOh Management fee

$7,5 10.00 8,000.00 2,974.60

41,506.49 4,096.26 1.000.00 1,500.00 2,222.96 8,660.18 1,800.00 1,921.02

TOTAL $86,882.51 ** ** NOTE: Of this amount, only $80,000 was actually filed for assessment.

EXPENSES, V.GUINET

Fuel Accommodation Telephone Air Travel Materials and supplies Trucking, (excavator) Groceries Misc. Filing work,

619.06 386.80 368.72 294.93 180.43 138.30

1,357.49 114.55

4,000.00

TOTAL $8,660.18

Receipts will be supplied by Double Creek on request.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED