Bridging the Gap between idealized and realistic numerical river plume simulations
description
Transcript of Bridging the Gap between idealized and realistic numerical river plume simulations
Bridging the Gap between idealized and realistic numerical river plume
simulations
Robert HetlandTexas A&M University
Feedback between idealized and realistic modeling
Idealiz
ed
modelin
g
Realis
tic
mod
elin
g
Numerical consistency
Physical consistency
Metrics(Depends on user
requirements)
Transition to operational models
• What are the requirements of the model end-user?– A metric that embodies this requirement.
• How do you quantify good model performance?– Skill assessment measures model’s ability to
reproduce the desired metric.
Metric - Fresh water flux
• Broad, integrative metric for buoyancy flow as a whole.
• Depends on definition of reference salinity.
• Also interested in the nature of the fresh water flux (e.g., what kind of water carries the fresh water?)
Model skill - ‘Synoptic skill’
Anatomy of a river plume
• Assume that the plume may be divided into dynamically distinct regions:– Near field where advection of
momentum is important.– Far field where wind forcing and the
earth’s rotation are the dominant physics.
Dynamically definedplume regions - cross section
Dynamically definedplume regions - cross section
Plume structure - Day 8.3 (mean flow, no wind)
Surface salinity Fresh water thickness
Mixing and the Froude # Max. vertical salt flux Froude number
Dynamically definedplume regions - cross section
Plume structure
Upwelling Downwelling DownwellingUpwelling
Surface salinity Fresh water thickness
Vertical salt flux - with windupwelling downwelling No wind
Integrated vertical salt fluxWind/no wind comparison
Wind
No wind
Surface salinity - wind vs. none
QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Gulf o
f M
ain
eSea s
urf
ace
salin
ity
Hetl
and &
Sig
nell
Fresh water flux EMCC
Fresh water flux WMCC
Model skill of buoyancy driven coastal current transport
EMCC WMCC
33 hr 7 day 33 hr 7 day
Along-shore currents -0.41 0.01 -0.87 -0.74
Cross-shore currents -1.06 -0.46 -0.51 0.57
Surface salinity -0.47 -0.36 0.83 0.98
Fresh water flux 0.52 0.86 0.03 0.66
Realistic model conclusions
• While the model does not have high skill at point-by-point comparisons, the model is good at simulating the large ‘whole plume’ scale.
• The model resolution is not high enough to resolve the estuary/near field regime, but still simulates the fresh water transport correctly.
Wind forcing must reduce the sensitivity to the source
Fresh water (salinity class)Q
f = 1
000
m3 s
-1
max= 0.1 m2 s-2Q
f = 3
000
m3 s
-1
max= 0.2 m2 s-2
Future direction
• Idealized modeling:– How does wind control the plume salinity
and spatial dimensions?– How do other types forcing (background
flow, pulsing discharge) influence water mass modification by the wind.
• Realistic modeling: – What are reasonable ranges in parameter
space?– What is required to resolve the small-scale
features of the plume?