BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code...
Transcript of BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code...
![Page 1: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM
Fall 2015
Course Title: Teaching Diverse Populations of Children and Youth Course Number: EDU 255 Credit: 3 semester hours Time: TTH 9:30 – 10: 50 Prerequisite: Sophomore status Completion of
English 102 Recommended
Instructor: Dr. Marlaine K. Chase Office: A356 Office Hours: As posted Phone: (O) 270 686-6415 E-mail: [email protected] (M) 812 457-4628 Catalog Description: Introduction to issues regarding elements of diversity in P–12 children and youth that affect educational performance and outcomes. Elements of diversity examined include: gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, socio-economic status, language, exceptionalities, religion, and geographical area. Current issues include: legal requirements at state and federal levels, definitions, characteristics, educational needs of identified and at-risk students, appropriate adaptations/accommodations/modifications for school environments and BRESCIA UNIVERSITY.
Field Hours Required: 20 Kentucky Field Experience Tracking System (KFETS):
The Kentucky Field Experience Tracking System (KFETS) is an online application tracking field experiences of teacher candidates enrolled in a Kentucky teacher preparation program and students who plan to enroll in a teacher preparation program in Kentucky. Candidates in Kentucky are required to complete a minimum of 200 field experience hours prior to student teaching. 16 KAR 5:040. Link to the webpage: http://www.epsb.ky.gov/teacherprep/fieldexperience.asp Candidates will make entries either after each on-site visit or weekly for the duration of the field experience associated with this course.
General Education (GER) or Major Requirement: This course does not fulfill a specific Brescia GER; however this course is a related subject, major, or professional education requirement. For candidates majoring in: Special Education, Elementary Education, Middle Grades Education, Secondary Education, Art Education P-12 and Spanish P-12 this is common course across all initial teacher certification programs. Speech Pathology/Audiology majors are also required to take this course.
![Page 2: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Text: Hallahan, Kauffman & Pullen ISBN-10: 0133744035 • ISBN-13: 9780133744033
©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version
Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M. & Pullen, P. C. (2015). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
Readings: The following are in addition to the assigned text:
Appropriate readings from Special Education Journals, Internet sources, and selected references for research project.
One book from the attached Listing of Disability-Related Literature for Book Review/Report (bibliography)
Taskstream All students enrolled in EDU course(s) or education majors must maintain a subscription to Taskstream throughout the duration of the EDU course. To enroll access the following URL: http://www.taskstream.com/pub/Enroll/Default.asp This site is where you access information on program/course requirements, signature assignments, assessments and portfolios. This course contains element(s) requiring submission through Taskstream. Beginning Fall 2015, candidates are financially responsible for obtaining their own subscription. Once the candidate has obtained the subscription, they must contact Sr. Betsy Moyer at [email protected] to inform her that they have purchased and activated their account. Signature Assignment: This is the Signature Assignment for Edu 255 to be submitted and
evaluated on Taskstream.
Compile a Research-based Resource File. The file contains 15 category folders in specific areas of diversity present in P-12 student populations. 13 category folders address each of the following federally approved categories of exceptionalities: IDD, LD, ADHD, EBD, ASD, CD, DHH, Blind/Low Vision, Low-incidence, Multiple & Severe, PD & OHI, G&T. You are to choose two (2) category folders from the following elements of diversity: Sexual Orientation, Gender, Language Differences/ESL/ELL, SES, family structures and Culture.
Each category folder must contain the following elements: federal and state regulatory definition, educational characteristics, behavioral characteristics, research (evidence)- based teaching/intervention suggestions [specific to your anticipated teaching/clinical field], services and resources at local, state, national and international levels that can be accessed by p-12 students/families/professional colleagues [must evidence ability to locate credible resources beyond those included in the text].
![Page 3: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The final product will be in the format of one (1) of the following: parent-colleague pamphlets, a Word file, a PowerPoint slide show, or a web site and may be augmented by other material. Consult with your instructor if you want to propose an alternate format. (CCR-R1, CCR-R2, CCR-R7, CCR-W2, CCR-W4, CCR-Wi6i, CCR-W7, CCR-W8)
Signature Assignment Assessment: Each of the category folders will be scored using the following rating scale: 1 Ineffective, 2 Developing, 3 Accomplished and 4 Exemplary Each of the 5 required elements within a category folder can be scored 1 to 4. Total score for each category folder can range from 5 to 20. Total score for the entire Research-based Resource File can range from a score of 75 to 300.
EDU 255 Research-based Resource File Rubric
NOTE: This is an excerpt of the rubric displaying section for one (1) category folder
Rating Scale Ineffective
value: 1.00
Developing
value: 2.00
Accomplished
value: 3.00
Exemplary
value: 4.00 Score/Level
Learners with
Intellectual &
Developmental
Disabilities
Federal/State
Regulations
No federal or state
definition
Has either federal or
state but not both Has federal and state
Notes current review,
proposed or recent
changes at federal or
state levels
Behavioral
Characteristics
Not included or
Incorrect
1-2 correct
characteristics at stated
level (Edu/Sppa)
3 correct characteristics
at stated level
(Edu/Spaa)
4 or more correct
characteristics at stated
level (Edu/Sppa)
Educational
Characteristics
Not included or
Incorrect
1-2 correct
characteristics at stated
level (Edu/Sppa)
3 correct characteristics
at stated level
(Edu/Spaa)
4 or more correct
characteristics at stated
level (Edu/Sppa)
Teaching
Instruction &
Intervention
Not included or
Incorrect or not
evidence-based (EBI)
1-2 Teaching
Instruction or
Interventions that are
evidence-based
3 Teaching
Instruction or
Interventions
that are evidence-based
4 or more Teaching
Instruction or
Interventions that are
evidence-based
Resources
Not included or
Incorrect at local, state
and national/
International area
1-2 resources correct in
each area
3 resources correct in
each area
4 or more resources
correct in each area
![Page 4: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
NOTES: In order for you to score a 4 in element 1, you must do extra research and provide notes of how you engaged in a current review and state proposed or recent changes at federal or state levels.
The entire rubric consists of 15 sections identical to this. Each of the first thirteen (13) is labeled with a specific category of disability. The last two (2) you will choose the labels from the following elements of diversity: Sexual Orientation, Gender, ESL/ELL, SES and Culture so determine which of these elements are the most interesting to you or the ones you feel will best prepare you for future students.
Disability Statement: Brescia University is committed to providing equal access to
education for all students. Reasonable accommodations are available for students with
a documented disability. If you have a documented disability and need accommodations
to participate fully in this course, please contact Mr. Dwight Ottman (Office 411 on the
fourth floor of the Science Building). All academic accommodations must be approved in
advance through his office. Please drop by or call 270-686-4281 to make an
appointment, or contact him by email at [email protected].
Academic Integrity Statement: An act of deliberate academic dishonesty, including
plagiarism, purchasing or copying another’s work and using it as your own, will not be
tolerated. (Brescia University Catalog p.44) Such acts will be reported to the Academic
Dean for disciplinary action.
Cell phone policy: To avoid distraction to the teaching and learning process and as a courtesy to all, cell phones will be turned off during class sessions. No texting allowed. A warning will be issued the first time and then a possible Discipline Alert will be issued to the Dean of Academic Affairs. Late Assignment Policy Late assignments receive a 20 points deduction for each day they are late. Assignments that are more than 3 days late will not be accepted. In addition, no assignment will be accepted after the last day of class. All assignments are to be typed and double spaced and follow APA Style Manual
(6th ed. 2nd printing) guidelines.
A Word about Attendance: Education is a collegial enterprise where we learn from one another. Teaching is a lifetime endeavor, and habits formed during your teacher preparation program will sustain you in your work. Attendance is expected and necessary for the success of the class, both for you and for the other members. Poor attendance will negatively affect your performance, lower your grade, and deprive us of your unique perspective. If a candidate isn’t committed to attending and actively engaging in class, why would one expect that candidate to be committed to good attendance and engagement once they are a teacher?
![Page 5: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Course Objectives: Readings, simulations, and reflections throughout the semester lead candidates to examine their understanding of, expand their awareness of, and develop an empathetic stance toward a variety of persons with exceptional needs and other elements of diversity that may place them at-risk or interfere with their potential success in learning. In addition, at the completion of this course, the candidate will have demonstrated both an understanding of and the ability to critically discuss at least the following topics: 1. The history of the development of legislation, litigation, services and attitudes toward
persons with exceptional needs; 2. The major issues associated with special education and their relationship to regular
education, professional organizations, and advocacy; 3. The impact of cultural and linguistic diversity (upon those who deliver and those who
receive specially designed instruction and awareness of resources in the Implementation Manual of the Program of Studies; (ESL/ELL)
4. The impact of other elements of diversity e.g. gender, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, and family structures, etc.
5. The terminology of special education and the types of educational services available;
6. The characteristics of a variety of exceptionalities and their educational and psychosocial impact upon the P-12 student, the student's peers, teachers, and family;
7. The procedures for accessing and the provision of appropriate administrative and educational services, adaptations, and advocacy for persons with exceptional needs;
8. The role of related services in special education and procedures for accessing them; 9. The goal of ensuring access to the general curriculum for all students with
exceptional needs [i.e., exploration of Kentucky’s curricular documents – Learner Goals & Academic Expectations, Program of Studies, Core Content for Assessment, Implementation Manual];
10. The exploration of strategies, intervention techniques and technologies which have been shown to be effective best practice in helping students with exceptional needs access and participate in the general curriculum.
Activities and Means of Evaluation: The learning activities employed during this course will include but are not be limited to the following: 1. Participating in class including active listening; group and individual discussion;
simulation activities; demonstration of understanding of text, digital experiences, and lecture.
2. Remaining current in your reading of the text (CCR-R1, CCR-R10). 3. Creating, implementing and participating during in-class activities that simulate a
variety of disabilities, and submission of written reflections on the experiences (CCR-R3, CCR-R7, CCR-W2, CCR-W3, CCR-W4, CCR-W6).
4. Compiling a researched-based resource file synthesizing each of the following federally approved categories of exceptionalities: IDD, LD, ADHD, EBD, ASD, CD, DHH, Blind/Low Vision, Low-incidence, Multiple & Severe, PD & OHI, G&T Each category folder must contain the following elements: regulatory definition,
![Page 6: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
educational and/or behavioral characteristics, research (evidence)-based teaching/intervention suggestions [specific to your anticipated teaching/clinical field], services and resources local, state, national and international levels for P-12 learners/families/professional colleagues [must evidence ability to locate credible resources beyond those included in the text]. The final product will be in the format of one (1) of the following: parent-colleague pamphlets, a Word file, a PowerPoint slide show, or a web site and may be augmented by other material. Consult with your instructor if you want to propose an alternate format. (CCR-R1, CCR-R2, CCR-R7, CCR-W2, CCR-W4, CCR-Wi6i, CCR-W7, CCR-W8).
5. Reading and creating a book report - review of one book in the attached Listing of Disability-Related Literature for Book Review/Report options list (CCR-R1, CCR-R2, CCR-R3, CCR-W1, CCR-W2).
6. Participation in a minimum of 20 hours of field experience over a minimum of 7 weeks and maintenance of a daily log and a descriptive and reflective field journal (CCR-W2, CCr-W4, CCR-W10).
7. Completion of chapter quizzes for Chapters 1-15. 8. Completion of two written examinations – midterm (Ch. 5-9) final (Ch.10-15). 9. Diversity Celebration sharing of impact and personal motivation.
Means of Evaluation: The candidate will be evaluated upon the following: Assignments and Products Points
Possible Points
1. Attendance, preparation for, and participation in class 100
2. Chapter quizzes (15 @ 10 pts. each) 150
3. Collaborative simulation and activities for a chapter 50
4. Resource File (Signature Assignment) 300
5. Book Report-Review 100
7. a. Field experience (log of required 20 hours) 20
b. Field experience (descriptive & reflective journal) 60
8. Exams (two at 100 points each) . . . Exam #1 100
. . . Exam #2 9.Diversity Celebration presentation
100 20
_________
Total Points Possible 1000 Grading Scale: A = 930 and above B = 840 through 929 C = 770 through 839 D = 700 through 769
F = 699 and below
![Page 7: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Evidence of Activities Designed to Address Brescia's Educational Outcomes, Educational Studies Program Conceptual Model,
and Kentucky Teacher Standards Linkage to Brescia’s Educational Outcomes: School of Education majors are expected to perform the following:
1. Brescia University graduates will demonstrate the ability to think critically,
analyze information, and communicate effectively.
2. Brescia University graduates will attain competence in and apply a field of study
in readiness for graduate school or a career in an appropriate field.
3. Brescia University graduates will possess the capacity to adapt to diverse
environments.
4. Brescia University graduates will understand and apply ethical standards in promoting justice and service to others.
Linkage to School of Education Conceptual Model
Brescia University teacher education students are challenged to become
professional educators committed to ethics, advocacy, service and lifelong learning.
Before future educators can instill these values in their students, they must gain experience in these endeavors. The following matrix identifies which of this
course’s objectives and activities could, at a minimum, provide an opportunity for such experiences:
Conceptual Model Component
Course
Objective #
Course
Activity #
Professional Educator
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Content/pedagogy
1, 3, 4, 7, 8
Ethics
1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9 4, 5
Advocacy
2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10 4,5
![Page 8: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Service
10 Field Experience
5, 6
Lifelong Learning
1-10 Remaining current
2, 4, 5
Kentucky Teacher Standards: Each pre-service teacher candidate in Kentucky is expected to demonstrate competence in the Kentucky Teacher Standards for P-12 or IECE. The following represent some of the Standards and accompanying Performance Criteria which are addressed in this course:
Linkage of Course Components to Kentucky P-12 Teacher Standards
Kentucky Teacher Standards Components
1. The Teacher Demonstrates Applied Content Knowledge The teacher demonstrates a current and sufficient academic knowledge of certified content areas to develop student knowledge and performance in those areas.
Course objectives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and Activities 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 will help prepare new teachers
2. The Teacher Designs and Plans Instruction The teacher designs/plans instruction and learning climates that develop student abilities to use communication skills, apply core concepts, become self-sufficient individuals, become responsible team members, think and solve problems, and integrate knowledge.
Course objectives 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, with field experience and related requirements help prepare new teachers
3. The Teacher Creates and Maintains Learning Climate The teacher creates a learning climate that supports the development of student abilities to use communication skills, apply core concepts, become self-sufficient individuals, become responsible team members, think and solve problems, and integrate knowledge
Course objectives 3, 5, 8; and Activities 2, 3, 6, will help prepare new teachers
4. The Teacher Implements and Manages Instruction The teacher introduces/implements/manages instruction that develops student abilities to use communication skills, apply core concepts, become self-sufficient individuals, become responsible team members, think and solve problems, and integrate knowledge.
Activities 4 (synthesis) & 6 (field participation and related activities) will help prepare new teachers
5. The Teacher Assesses and Communicates Learning Results The teacher assesses learning and communicates results to students and others with respect to student abilities to use communication skills, apply core concepts, become self-sufficient individuals, become responsible team members, think and solve problems, and integrate knowledge.
NA
![Page 9: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
6. The Teacher Demonstrates Implementation of Technology The teacher uses technology to support instruction; access and manipulate data; enhance professional growth and productivity; communicate and collaborate with colleagues, parents, and the community; and conduct research.
Course objectives 9 and 10; and Activities 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 will help prepare new teachers
7. Reflects on and Evaluates Teaching and Learning The teacher reflects on and evaluates specific teaching/learning situations and/or programs.
Activities 3 (simulations), 6, (daily log and descriptive field journal) will help prepare new teachers
8. Collaborates with Colleagues/ Parents/Others The teacher collaborates with colleagues, parents, and other agencies to design, implement, and support learning programs that develop student abilities to use communication skills, apply core concepts, become self-sufficient individuals, become responsible team members, think and solve problems, and integrate knowledge.
Course objectives 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6; and Activities 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 will help prepare new teachers
9. Evaluates Teaching and Implements Professional Development The teacher evaluates his/her overall performance with respect to modeling and teaching Kentucky's learning goals, refines the skills and processes necessary, and implements a professional development plan.
NA
10.Provides Leadership within the School/Community/Profession
NA
Linkage of Course Components to Kentucky IECE Teacher Standards:
KENTUCKY TEACHER STANDARDS Course
Objective
Course
Activity #
1 Designs/Plans Instruction
The Interdisciplinary Early Childhood Education (IECE)
educator designs and plans experiences and instruction
that support the development and learning of infants,
toddlers, preschool children, and kindergarten children,
including those with disabilities.
Course
objectives
3, 4, 5, 7, 8
Activities 3, 4
with field
experience
and related
requirements
help prepare
new teachers
![Page 10: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
2. Creates/Maintains Environments
The IECE educator creates and maintains learning
environments in a variety of settings that support the
development and learning of infants, toddlers, preschool
children, and kindergarten children, including those with
disabilities.
Course
objectives
3, 5, 8
Activities 2, 3,
6 will help
prepare new
teachers
3. Implements Instruction
The IECE educator introduces, implements, and facilitates
experiences and instruction that support development and
learning for infants, toddlers, preschool children, and
kindergarten children, including those with disabilities
Activities 4
(synthesis) &
6 (field
participation
and related
activities) will
help prepare
new teachers
4. Assesses & Communicates Learning Results
The IECE educator, in collaboration with others, assesses
the development and ongoing learning of infants, toddlers,
preschool children, and kindergarten children, including
those with disabilities, and communicates the results with
partners, including families.
NA
5. Reflects/Evaluates Professional Practices
The IECE educator reflects on and evaluates professional
practices that support the development and learning of
infants, toddlers, preschool children, and kindergarten
children, including those with disabilities.
Activities 3 (simulations), 6, (daily log and descriptive field journal) will help prepare new teachers
![Page 11: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
6. Collaborates with Colleagues/Families/Others
The IECE educator collaborates and consults with team
members including colleagues, families, primary caregivers,
agency personnel, and other service personnel to design
and implement experiences and instruction that support the
development and learning of infants, toddlers, preschool
children, and kindergarten children, including those with
disabilities
Course
objectives
1, 2, 3, 4,
and 6;
Activities 1, 3,
4, 5, 6 and 9
will help
prepare new
teachers
7. Engages in Professional Development
The IECE educator engages in self-evaluation of
professional practices and implements a professional
development plan to improve his/her performance.
NA
8. Supports Families
The IECE educator supports families through family-
centered services that promote independence and self-
determination, programs that develop student abilities to
use communication skills, apply core concepts, become
self-sufficient individuals, become responsible team
members, think and solve problems, and integrate
knowledge.
Course
objectives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8
Activities 4, 9
9 Demonstrates Implementation of Technology
The IECE educator uses technology to support instruction;
access and manipulate data; enhance professional growth
and productivity; communicate and collaborate with
colleagues, families, and community agencies; and conduct
research.
Course
objectives 9
and 10
Activities 2, 4,
5, 8, 9 will
help prepare
new teachers
10. Provides Leadership within
School/Community/Profession
The teacher provides professional leadership within the
school, community, and education profession to improve
student learning and sell-being.
NA
![Page 12: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CEC Initial Level Special Educator Preparation
CEC Initial Preparation Standard 1: Learner Development and Individual Learning Differences
1.0 Beginning special education professionals understand how exceptionalities may interact with
development and learning and use this knowledge to provide meaningful and challenging learning
experiences for individuals with exceptionalities.
Key Elements
1.1 Beginning special education professionals understand how language, culture, and family background
influence the learning of individuals with exceptionalities.
1.2 Beginning special education professionals use understanding of development and individual
differences to respond to the needs of individuals with exceptionalities.
CEC Initial Preparation Standard 2: Learning Environments
2.0 Beginning special education professionals create safe, inclusive, culturally responsive learning
environments so that individuals with exceptionalities become active and effective learners and develop
emotional well-being, positive social interactions, and self-determination.
Key Elements
2.1 Beginning special education professionals through collaboration with general educators and other
colleagues create safe, inclusive, culturally responsive learning environments to engage individuals with
exceptionalities in meaningful learning activities and social interactions.
2.2 Beginning special education professionals use motivational and instructional interventions to teach
individuals with exceptionalities how to adapt to different environments.
2.3 Beginning special education professionals know how to intervene safely and appropriately with
individuals with exceptionalities in crisis.
CEC Initial Preparation Standard 3: Curricular Content Knowledge
3.0 Beginning special education professionals use knowledge of general3 and specialized curricula4 to
individualize learning for individuals with exceptionalities.
Key Elements
3.1 Beginning special education professionals understand the central concepts, structures of the
discipline, and tools of inquiry of the content areas they teach, and can organize this knowledge,
integrate cross-disciplinary skills, and develop meaningful learning progressions for individuals with
exceptionalities.
![Page 13: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
3.2 Beginning special education professionals understand and use general and specialized content
knowledge for teaching across curricular content areas to individualize learning for individuals with
exceptionalities.
3.3 Beginning special education professionals modify general and specialized curricula to make them
accessible to individuals with exceptionalities.
CEC Initial Preparation Standard 4: Assessment
4.0 Beginning special education professionals use multiple methods of assessment and data-sources in
making educational decisions.
Key Elements
4.1 Beginning special education professionals select and use technically sound formal and informal
assessments that minimize bias.
4.2 Beginning special education professionals use knowledge of measurement principles and practices
to interpret assessment results and
guide educational decisions for individuals with exceptionalities.
4.3 Beginning special education professionals in collaboration with colleagues and families use multiple
types of assessment information in making decisions about individuals with exceptionalities.
4.4 Beginning special education professionals engage individuals with exceptionalities to work toward
quality learning and performance and provide feedback to guide them.
CEC Initial Preparation Standard 5: Instructional Planning and Strategies
5.0 Beginning special education professionals select, adapt, and use a repertoire of evidence-based
instructional strategies6 to advance learning of individuals with exceptionalities.
Key Elements
5.1 Beginning special education professionals consider an individual's abilities, interests, learning
environments, and cultural and linguistic factors in the selection, development, and adaptation of
learning experiences for individual with exceptionalities.
5.2 Beginning special education professionals use technologies to support instructional assessment,
planning, and delivery for individuals with exceptionalities.
5.3 Beginning special education professionals are familiar with augmentative and alternative
communication systems and a variety of assistive technologies to support the communication and
learning of individuals with exceptionalities.
5.4 Beginning special education professionals use strategies to enhance language development and
communication skills of individuals with exceptionalities.
![Page 14: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
5.5 Beginning special education professionals develop and implement a variety of education and
transition plans for individuals with exceptionalities across a wide range of settings and different
learning experiences in collaboration with individuals, families, and teams.
5.6 Beginning special education professionals teach to mastery and promote generalization of learning.
5.7 Beginning special education professionals teach cross-disciplinary knowledge and skills such as
critical thinking and problem solving to individuals with exceptionalities.
CEC Initial Preparation Standard 6: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice
6.0 Beginning special education professionals use foundational knowledge of the field and the their
professional Ethical Principles and Practice Standards to inform special education practice, to engage in
lifelong learning, and to advance the profession.
Key Elements
6.1 Beginning special education professionals use professional Ethical Principles and Professional
Practice Standards to guide their practice.
6.2 Beginning special education professionals understand how foundational knowledge and current
issues influence professional practice.
6.3 Beginning special education professionals understand that diversity is a part of families, cultures,
and schools, and that complex human issues can interact with the delivery of special education services.
6.4 Beginning special education professionals understand the significance of lifelong learning and
participate in professional activities and learning communities.
6.5 Beginning special education professionals advance the profession by engaging in activities such as
advocacy and mentoring.
6.6 Beginning special education professionals provide guidance and direction to paraeducators, tutors,
and volunteers.
CEC Initial Preparation Standard 7: Collaboration
7.0 Beginning special education professionals collaborate with families, other educators, related service
providers, individuals with exceptionalities, and personnel from community agencies in culturally
responsive ways to address the needs of individuals with exceptionalities across a range of learning
experiences.
Key Elements
7.1 Beginning special education professionals use the theory and elements of effective collaboration.
7.2 Beginning special education professionals serve as a collaborative resource to colleagues.
![Page 15: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
7.3 Beginning special education professionals use collaboration to promote the well-being of individuals
with exceptionalities across a wide range of settings and collaborators.
CEC Initial Level Special Educator Preparation Standards Addressed in Edu 255
Standard Indicators
1 1.0 1.1 1,2
2 2.0 2.3
3 3.0 3.3
4 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4
5 5.0 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5
6 6.1 6.2 6.3
7 7.0 7.1 7.3
CEC Standards Addressed in Chapters
Chapter 1 – 1.2, 6.2, 6.3
Chapter 2 – 3.0, 4.0, 4.2, 4.4, 5.0, 5.2, 5.5, 6.1, 6.2, 7.0
Chapter 3 – 1.1, 1.2, 2.0, 4.1, 6.2, 6.3, 7.0, 7.1
Chapter 4 – 1.1, 4.3, 5.5, 6.3, 7.0, 7.3
Chapter 5 – 1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 3.3, 4.0, 5.0, 5.5, 6.2, 7.0
Chapter 6 – 1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 3.3, 4.0, 5.0, 5.5, 6.2, 7.0
Chapter 7 – 1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 3.3, 4.0, 5.0, 5.5, 6.2, 7.0
Chapter 8 – 1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 2.3, 3.3, 4.0, 5.0, 5.5, 6.2, 7.0
Chapter 9 – 1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 3.3, 4.0, 5.0, 5.3, 5.4, 6.2, 7.0
Chapter 10 – 1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 3.3, 4.0, 5.0, 5.5, 6.2, 7.0
Chapter 11–1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 3.3, 4.0, 5.0, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 6.2, 7.0
Chapter 12 – 1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 3.3, 4.0, 5.0, 5.3, 5.4, 6.2, 7.0
Chapter 13 – 1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 3.3, 4.0, 5.0, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 6.2, 7.0
Chapter 14 – 1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 3.3, 4.0, 5.0, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 6.2, 7.0
Chapter 15 – 1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 3.3, 4.0, 5.0, 5.5, 6.2, 7.0
![Page 16: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
CEC Initial Level Gifted Educator Preparation Standards
Standard 1: Learner Development and Individual Learning Differences Beginning gifted education professionals understand the variations in learning and development in cognitive and affective areas between and among individuals with gifts and talents and apply this understanding to provide meaningful and challenging learning experiences for individuals with exceptionalities.
1.1 Beginning gifted education professionals understand how language, culture, economic status, family background, and/or area of disability can influence the learning of individuals with exceptionalities.
1.2 Beginning gifted education professionals use understanding of development and individual differences to respond to the needs of individuals with gifts and talents.
Standard 2: Learning Environments Beginning gifted education professionals create safe, inclusive, and culturally responsive learning environments so that individuals with gifts and talents become effective learners and develop social and emotional well-being.
2.1 Beginning gifted education professionals create safe, inclusive, culturally responsive learning environments that engage individuals with gifts and talents in meaningful and rigorous learning activities and social interactions.
2.2 Beginning gifted education professionals use communication and motivational and instructional interventions to facilitate understanding of subject matter and to teach individuals with gifts and talents how to adapt to different environments and develop ethical leadership skills.
2.3 Beginning gifted education professionals adjust their communication to an individual’s language proficiency and cultural and linguistic differences.
2.4 Beginning gifted education professionals demonstrate understanding of the multiple environments that are part of a continuum of services for individuals with gifts and talents, including the advantages and disadvantages of various settings.
![Page 17: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Standard 3: Curricular Content Knowledge Beginning gifted education professionals use knowledge of general1 and specialized curricula2 to advance learning for individuals with gifts and talents.
3.1 Beginning gifted education professionals understand the role of central concepts, structures of the discipline, and tools of inquiry of the content areas they teach, and use their understanding to organize knowledge, integrate cross-disciplinary skills, and develop meaningful learning progressions within and across grade levels.
3.2 Beginning gifted education professionals design appropriate learning and performance modifications for individuals with gifts and talents that enhance creativity, acceleration, depth and complexity in academic subject matter and specialized domains.
3.3 Beginning gifted education professionals use assessments to select, adapt, and create materials to differentiate instructional strategies and general and specialized curricula to challenge individuals with gifts and talents.
3.4 Beginning gifted education professionals understand that individuals with gifts and talents demonstrate a wide range of advanced knowledge and performance levels and modify the general or specialized curriculum appropriately.
Standard 4: Assessment Beginning gifted education professionals use multiple methods of assessment and data sources in making educational decisions about identification and learning.
4.1 Beginning gifted education professionals understand that some groups of individuals with gifts and talents have been underrepresented in gifted education programs and select and use technically sound formal and informal assessments that minimize bias.
4.2 Beginning gifted education professionals use knowledge of measurement principles and practices to differentiate assessments and interpret results to guide educational decisions for individuals with gifts and talents.
4.3 Beginning gifted education professionals collaborate with colleagues and families in using multiple types of assessment information to make identification and learning progress decisions and to minimize bias in assessment and decision-making.
4.4 Beginning gifted education professionals use assessment results to develop long- and short-range goals and objectives that take into consideration an individual’s abilities and needs, the learning environment, and other factors related to diversity.
4.5 Beginning gifted education professionals engage individuals with gifts and talents in assessing the quality of their own learning and performance and in setting future goals and objectives.
![Page 18: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Standard 5: Instructional Planning and Strategies Beginning gifted education professionals select, adapt, and use a repertoire of evidence-based instructional strategies3 to advance the learning of individuals with gifts and talents.
5.1 Beginning gifted education professionals know principles of evidence-based, differentiated, and accelerated practices and possess a repertoire of instructional strategies to enhance the critical and creative thinking, problem-solving, and performance skills of individuals with gifts and talents.
5.2 Beginning gifted education professionals apply appropriate technologies to support instructional assessment, planning, and delivery for individuals with gifts and talents.
5.3 Beginning gifted education professionals collaborate with families, professional colleagues, and other educators to select, adapt, and use evidence-based strategies that promote challenging learning opportunities in general and specialized curricula.
5.4 Beginning gifted education professionals emphasize the development, practice, and transfer of advanced knowledge and skills across environments throughout the lifespan leading to creative, productive careers in a multicultural society for individuals with gifts and talents.
5.5 Beginning gifted education professionals use instructional strategies that enhance the affective development of individuals with gifts and talents.
Standard 6: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice Beginning gifted education professionals use foundational knowledge of the field and professional ethical principles and Program Standards4 to inform gifted education practice, to engage in lifelong learning, and to advance the profession.
6.1 Beginning gifted education professionals use professional ethical principles and specialized program standards to guide their practice.
6.2 Beginning gifted education professionals understand how foundational knowledge, perspectives, and historical and current issues influence professional practice and the education and treatment of individuals with gifts and talents both in school and society.
6.3 Beginning gifted education professionals model respect for diversity, understanding that it is an integral part of society’s institutions and impacts learning of individuals with gifts and talents in the delivery of gifted education services.
6.4 Beginning gifted education professionals are aware of their own professional learning needs, understand the significance of lifelong learning, and participate in professional activities and learning communities.
6.5 Beginning gifted education professionals advance the profession by engaging in activities such as advocacy and mentoring.
![Page 19: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Standard 7: Collaboration Beginning gifted education professionals collaborate with families, other educators, related-service providers, individuals with gifts and talents, and personnel from community agencies in culturally responsive ways to address the needs of individuals with gifts and talents across a range of learning experiences.
7.1 Beginning gifted education professionals apply elements of effective collaboration.
7.2 Beginning gifted education professionals serve as a collaborative resource with colleagues.
7.3 Beginning gifted education professionals use collaboration to promote the well-being of individuals with gifts and talents across a wide range of settings and collaborators.
CEC Initial Level Gifted Educator Preparation Standards Addressed in Edu 255
Standard Indicators
1 1.1 1,2
2 2.2 2.4
3 3.1 3.4
4 4.1
5 5.1
6 6.1 6.2 6.3
7 7.1
![Page 20: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
PROPOSED and PROBABLE CALENDAR EDU 255 -- Teaching Diverse Populations of Children and Youth
Fall 2015
Date Class Content Due Items
Thursday Aug. 20
Introduction; Syllabus, KFETS field hours Complete Field Hour Form and turn into Mr. Britton Hibbitt in CRC.
Tuesday Aug. 25
Share RFAD/name plate motivator, participate in Alike and Different activity, orientation to Getting to Know You written assignment
Name plate/ RFAD/diversity motivator
Thursday Aug. 27
Chapter 1—Exceptionality and Special Education: Examine Field & Journal Expectation
Getting to Know You
Tuesday Sept. 1
Chapter 2—Current Practices for Meeting the Needs of Exceptional Learners
Chapter 1 Quiz
Thursday Sept. 3
Chapter 3—Multicultural and Bilingual Aspects of Special Education Chapter 4—Parents and Families
Chapter 2 Quiz Field Hour placement details complete?
Tuesday Sept. 8
Chapter 5—Learners with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Chapter 3 Quiz
Thursday Sept. 10
Chapter 5 continued Chapter 4 Quiz
Tuesday Sept. 15.
Chapter 6 --Learners with Learning Disabilities Chapter 5 Quiz
Thursday Sept. 17
Chapter 6 continued
Tuesday Sept. 22.
Chapter 7 – Learners with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Chapter 6 Quiz
Thursday Sept. 24
Chapter 7 continued
Tuesday Sept. 29.
Independent or group work session on Book Review/Repot or Research-based Resource File
Chapter 7 Quiz
Thursday Oct, 1
Chapter 8 — Learners with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders
Tuesday Oct. 6
Chapter 8 continued
![Page 21: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Date Class Content Due Items
Thursday Oct, 8
Chapter 9 – Learners with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Chapter 8 Quiz
Tuesday Oct.13
Chapter 9 continued
Thursday Oct. 15 – Monday Oct. 19
FALL BREAK
Tuesday Oct. 20
Book Report/Review presentations Chapter 9 Quiz Book report/review submitted
Thursday Oct. 22
Midterm Exam Chapters 5-9 will be included
Tuesday Oct. 27
Chapter 10 – Learners with Communication Disorders
Thursday Oct.. 29
Chapter 10 continued
Tuesday Nov. 3
Chapter 11 – Learners Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
Chapter 10 Quiz
Thursday Nov. 5
Chapter 11 continued
Tuesday Nov. 10
Chapter 12 – Learners with Blindness or Low Vision Chapter 11 Quiz
Thursday Nov. 12
Chapter 12 continued
Tuesday Nov. 17
Chapter 13, Learners with Low Incidence, Multiple, and Severe Disabilities
Chapter 12 Quiz Resource File Due
Thursday Nov. 19
Chapter 13 continued
Tues. Nov. 24
Chapter 14 – Learners with Physical Disabilities and Other Health Impairments
Chapter 13 Quiz
Wednesday, Nov, 25 –Sunday, Nov. 29
Thanksgiving Break
![Page 22: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Date Class Content Due Items
Tuesday Dec. 1
Chapter 15—Learners with Special Gifts and Talents All Field Experience hours completed and Journal Due Chapter 14 Quiz
Thursday Dec. 3
Celebration of Diversity Chapter 15 Quiz
Monday Dec. 7 –
Wednesday Dec. 9
FINALS WEEK Chapters 10-15 will be included on the Final Exam.
NOTE: Instructor retains rights to make adjustments to this proposed calendar. Input from all members of the class will be sought prior to final determination of any changes. Approved options for the assignment: Read a book and create a book review/report are listed below. If you wish to propose another option, please schedule a time to discuss with instructor before engaging in the activity.
Listing of Disability-Related Literature for Book Review/Report NOTE: Some, but not all, are located in the CRC or the BU Library. Abeel, Samantha (2000). My Thirteenth Winter. Memoirs from a young girl who was
both gifted and identified with a specific learning disability; this particular disability is called “dyscalculia” (math disability); together with difficulties with telling time and recognizing patterns.
Albom, Mitch (2003). The Five People You Meet in Heaven. A fictional account of one
man’s trip to the afterlife. Axline, Virginia M. (1964). Dibs, In Search of Self. Personal account, emotional
disturbance. Ashton-Warner, Sylvia (1963). Teacher. Personal account of teaching with Australian
and New Zealand “aborigines”. Ashton-Warner, Sylvia (1979). I Passed This Way. Personal account of her life as a
teacher with Maoris, and the development of a unique language-based curriculum. Bettelheim, Bruno (1950). Love is Not Enough. Account of a school and program for
children with emotional and/or behavioral problems (rather old).
![Page 23: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Blatt, Burton (1966). Christmas in Purgatory. Photo-journalistic essay/expose' of
institutions. [must combine with one "Part" of Souls in Extremis Blatt, Burton (1973). Souls in Extremis. Essays, mental retardation and institutions;
any three (3) "parts". Bolander, Anne & Renning, Adair (2000). I was #87. Gallaudet University Press. First
person account of young woman who is deaf and had been incorrectly diagnosed as mentally retarded (and institutionalized); some “hard things” to read, but she persevered.
Brown, Christy. Down All the Days. Personal life story of young author with cerebral
palsy -- later became the movie My Left Foot. Burch, J.M. (1988) They Cage Animals at Night. New American Library. First person
account of a boy abandoned in an orphanage and shuttled among many foster placements.
Cleaver, Eldridge. Soul on Ice. Personal account of racism. Craig, Eleanor (1973). P.S. You’re not listening. Personal account, classroom for
children with behavior disorders. Craig, Eleanor (1978). One, Two, Three - Story of Matt, a Feral Child. Personal
account, dysfunctional family leading to emotional disturbance. D'Ambrosio, Richard (1970). No Language but a Cry. Personal account, child abuse. Derksen, Wilma (1991). Have You Seen Candace? The true story of Wilma Derksen’s
thirteen year old daughter who never made it home from school. Dowling, Colette (1981). The Cinderella Complex. A theory about women’s hidden fear
of independence. Eareckson, Joni (1976). Joni. Personal account, autobiography, acquired physical
disability & resultant depression. Fedullo, Mick (1992). Light of the Feather. Personal account of an "Anglo" teaching
among the "native Americans" on the Reservations. Gibbons, Kaye (1987). Ellen Foster. The story of a girl who survives an abusive father . Gibson, William (1956). The Miracle Worker. Historical drama, dual sensory
impairment, story of Annie Sullivan and Helen Keller.
![Page 24: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Grandin, Temple (1995). Thinking in Pictures. Personal account of growing up with autism and finding success in spite of it; a journey into or through her mind.
Grandin, Temple (1986). Emergence: Labeled Autistic. A true story of living with autism. Greenberg, Joanne (Hannah Green) (1964). I Never Promised You a Rose Garden.
Fictionalized personal account, mental illness and issues of institutionalization. Greenberg, Joanne. In This Sign. A novel about deaf parents with a hearing daughter. Handler, Lowell (1998). Twist and Shout, A Touretter’s Tale. New York: Penguin
Putnam, Inc. First person account of living with (his own) Tourette ’s syndrome. Harris, Thomas A. (1967). I’m OK You’re OK. This book translates psychological
theories into easily understood language. Hayden, Torey (1994). Ghost Girl. Avon Press. Teacher’s account of a student who
has experienced incredible personal difficulties. Hocken, Sheila (1977). Emma and I. Personal account, autobiography, visual
impairment. Itard, Jean-Marc-Gaspard & Lane, Harlan. The Wild Boy of Aveyron. Itard's account of
working with Victor, the “wild boy” of Aveyron, France. Jamison, K. R. (1996). An Unquiet Mind: A Memoir of Moods and Madness. New York,
Alfred A. Knopf. Incredibly fascinating personal account of this clinical psychologist’s own lifelong struggle with manic-depressive illness (her term, as opposed to “bipolar disorder”)
Jones, Beverly & Hart, Jane (1968). Where’s Hannah? Personal account and
handbook for parents of children with severe learning disabilities. Kaufman, Barry Neil (1976). Son Rise. Personal account, child with infantile autism. Kaufman, Christmas Carol (1960). For one Moment, A boy who grew up in Nazi
Germany. Keller, Helen Adams (1954). The Story of My Life. Personal account, autobiography,
dual sensory impairment. Killilea, Marie (1952). Karen. Personal account, cerebral palsy, family issues. Lee, Joanna, & Cook, T.S. (1978). Mary Jane Harper cried last night. Novel, child
abuse. Lee, Laurel (1977). Walking Through the Fire. The true story of a woman with Hodgkin’s
disease.
![Page 25: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Lusseyran, Jacques (1987). And There Was Light. Personal account of growing up blind in France during WWII; truly unique "look" at blindness.
MacCracken, Mary (1976). Lovey, a Very Special Child. Personal account, classroom
for children with emotional and behavior disorders; environmental deprivation. Massie, Robert, & Massie, Suzanne (1973). Journey. Personal account, hemophilia. Maurice, Catherine (1993). Let Me Hear Your Voice: A Family’s Triumph Over Autism.
New York: Fawcett Columbine. First person account of a family’s struggles to identify autism and to discover and employ educational interventions with their children with autism.
McCullers, Carson (1940). The Heart is a Lonely Hunter. Novel, classic, hearing
impairment in one of the central characters. McGovern, George (1996). Terry: My Daughter’s Life and Death Struggle with
Alcoholism. George McGovern a U. S. Senator from South Dakota, tells about his daughter’s fight with alcoholism.
Nasar, Sylvia (1998). A Beautiful Mind: The Life of Mathematical Genius and Nobel
Laureate John Nash. New York: Touchstone. O’Neill, Jasmine Lee (1999). Through the Eyes of Aliens: A Book About Autistic
People. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. A first person description of autism and its characteristics and impact on a person’s life; as told by a person who is an “autistic savant with elective mutism; and also a poet and artist”
Orenstein, M. (2001). Smart But Stuck: Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities and
Imprisoned Intelligence. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press. An examination of adults with previously “undiagnosed” learning disabilities; combination of reports of telephone conversations and person-to-person interviews, together with “reflections” on the results.
Pelzer, Dave (1995). A Child Called “It”. Health Communications. A first person
account of a survivor of child abuse who was rescued by teachers. Pelzer, Dave (1997). The Lost Boy: A Foster Child’s Search for the Love of a Family.
Health Communications. A first person account of a survivor of child abuse and the foster family system.
Pelzer, Dave (1999). A Man Named Dave: A Story of Triumph & Forgiveness. NY, NY:
A Plume Book of Penguin Putnam, Inc. First person account of the adult impact of his own history of child abuse and time in the foster care system.
![Page 26: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Perske, Robert (1995). Deadly Innocence. Historical account, young immigrant with mental retardation, implicated in murder, victim of family's ignorance and society's prejudicial expectations, death row.
Quinn, Tom (1999). ADHD Eddie, Intergalactic Ladies’ Man! Dunvegan Publishing, Inc.
Written by an author diagnosed with ADHD, this is a fictionalized account of a teenager working through ADHD.
Ridley, M. (1999). Genome: The Autobiography of a Species in 23 Chapters. New
York: Perennial, an Imprint of Harper Collins Publishers. Rodis, P., Garrod, A., & Boscardin, M.L. (2001). Learning Disabilities & Life Stories.
Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Introductions and 13 autobiographical essays by persons who have learning disabilities; read at least seven of the essays.
Schmitt, A. [as told to Mary Lou Hartzler Clemens] (1994). Brilliant IDIOT: An
Autobiography of a Dyslexic. Intercourse, PA: Good Books. Personal account of growing up both as a rural Mennonite and as a young man with dyslexia.
See, Lisa (2005). Snow Flower and the Secret Fan. A fictional account of growing up in
nineteenth century China. Sellin, B. (1995). I don’t want to be inside me anymore: Messages from an Autistic
mind. New York, NY: Basic Books, A Division of Harper Collins Publishers. The facilitated communication writings of a young man with autism.
Shattuck, Roger (1994). The Forbidden Experiment: The Story of the Wild Boy of
Aveyron. Historical account and translation of Itard's work; mental retardation and hearing impairment.
Simpson, Eileen (1979). Reversals. Personal account, autobiography, "overcoming"
dyslexia. Spradley, T.S., Spradley, J.P., & Spradley, L. (1985). Deaf Like Me. Washington, D.C.:
Gallaudet University Press. A father’s description of his family’s and his daughter’s movement from an oral approach to working with deafness to a more nearly “deaf culture” approach – paints fairly grim picture of the oral approach.
Walls, Jeannette (2005). The Glass Castle. Personal account of a child of an alcoholic Willey, L.H. (1999). Pretending to be Normal – Living with Asperger’s Syndrome.
Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Personal account; describes her own coping with Asperger’s Syndrome, a “mild” or high-functioning form of autism or autism spectrum disorder.
![Page 27: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Bibliography Cartledge, G. Y., Gardner III, R. & Ford, D. Y. (2009). Diverse learners with
exceptionalities:Culturally responsive teaching in the inclusive classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Cook, B. G. & Tankersly, M.G. (2013). Research-based practices in special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Coyne, M. D., Carnine, D. W., & Kame’enui, E.J. (2010). Effective teaching strategies that
accommodate diverse learners. (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Friend, M. (2014) Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals. (4th
ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Gargiulo, R. M. & Metcalf, D. Teaching in today’s inclusive classrooms: A universal design for
learning approach. (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Hardman, M. L., Drew, C. J., & Egan, M. W. (2014). Human exceptionality: School, community,
and family. (11th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Heward, W. L. (2013). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education. (10th ed.).
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Kirk, S. A., Gallagher, J. J., & Coleman, M. R. (2015). Educating exceptional children. (14th ed.).
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Miller, S. P. (2009). Validated practices for teaching students with diverse needs and abilities.
(2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Rosenberg, M. S., Westling, D. L., & McLeskey, J. M. (2011). Special education for today’s
teachers: An introduction. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Smith, D. D., & Tyler, N. C. (2014). Introduction to contemporary special education: New
horizons. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Turnbull, A. A., Turnbull, H. R., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2016). Exceptional lives:
Special education in today’s schools (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Vaughn, S. R., Bos, C. S., & Schumm, J. S. (2013) Teaching students who are exceptional,
diverse, and at risk in the general education classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
![Page 28: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Edu 255 Rubric for Book Report -Review Assignment
RATINGS
ELEMENTS
Exemplary
(15-20)
(9-10)
Accomplished
(10-14)
(6-8)
Developing
(5-9)
(3-4)
Insufficient
(0-4)
(1-2)
Summary
___/20pts
Exemplary
Summary
consists of a
discussion on
why book was
chosen, and
brief synopsis
of major
themes, ideas
and at least 4
excerpts from
the work. It
combines new
ideas from the
book into new
sentences using
your own
words.
Accomplished
Summary
consists of a
discussion on
why book was
chosen, and
brief synopsis
of major
themes, ideas
and at least 3
excerpts from
the work. It
combines new
ideas from the
book into new
sentences using
your own
words.
Developing
Summary
consists of a
discussion on
why book was
chosen, and
brief synopsis
of major
themes, ideas
and at least 2
excerpts from
the work. It
combines new
ideas from the
book into new
sentences using
your own
words.
Insufficient
Summary is
mostly an
outline of the
book and does
not discuss why
the book was
chosen. Lacks
brief synopsis
element(s).
Lacks excerpts
or Fails to
combine new
ideas from the
book into new
sentences using
your own
words.
Quotes
___/10pts
Exemplary
5 direct quotes
are noted by
citing page
numbers e.g.
(48). Quotes
demonstrate
analysis and/or
synthesis that
enhances and/or
expands a clear
point
Accomplished
2 or 3 direct
quotes cited
appropriately
or quotes
overused.
Quotes are
integrated well
and aid in
making a clear
point.
Developing
1 or 2 direct
quotes cited
appropriately.
Quote(s) used
primarily to
satisfy element
requirement and
are not well
integrated to
make a clear
point.
Insufficient
Direct quotes
not cited
appropriately
or quotes not
cited at all.
Quotes used
primarily to
satisfy element
requirement but
not connected
to make a point.
![Page 29: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Critique
___/20pts
Exemplary
The review
provides a clear
critique
statement and
offers great
insights into the
book. The
critique is
supported with
3-5 examples
from the book.
Critique
discusses 2 of
the 4 pillars of
the SOE
Conceptual
Framework
with great detail
and depth at
analyzing or
creating level.
Accomplished
The review
provides a clear
critique
statement and
offers insights
into the book.
The critique is
supported with
only 1-3
examples from
the book.
Critique
discusses 2 of
the 4 pillars of
the SOE
Conceptual
Framework
with some detail
and depth at
applying level.
Developing
The review
provides a
critique
statement and
insights into the
book that are
not well
developed. The
critique is
supported with
only 1 example
from the book.
Critique
discusses 1- 2
of the 4 pillars
of the SOE
Conceptual
Framework
with little detail
and depth at
understanding
level.
Insufficient
The review does
not provide a
clear critique
nor insight into
the book. It
does not
provide
adequate
examples from
the book for
support.
Critique does
not discuss 2 of
the 4 pillars of
the SOE
Conceptual
Framework
with any detail
and depth at
remembering
level.
Recommen-
dation
___/20pts
Exemplary
Advanced
Accomplished
Developing
Insufficient
Exemplary
Connections to
2 professional
knowledge base
and 2
dispositions
very clearly
demonstrate
how reading
and reviewing
the book has
impacted you
with respect to
the field of
education &
students with
exceptional
needs.
Accomplished
Connections to
2 professional
knowledge base
and 2
dispositions
demonstrate
how reading
and reviewing
the book has
impacted you
with respect to
the field of
education &
students with
exceptional
needs.
Developing
Connections to
1 professional
knowledge base
and 1
disposition
weakly
demonstrate
how reading
and reviewing
the book has
impacted you
with respect to
the field of
education &
students with
exceptional
needs.
Insufficient
Connections to
1-2 professional
knowledge base
and 1- 2
dispositions are
missing or do
not demonstrate
how reading
and reviewing
the book has
impacted you
with respect to
the field of
education &
students with
exceptional
needs.
![Page 30: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Organization
___/10 pts
The main
characters are
listed and
described.
Relationships
between
characters are
clear.
The main
characters are
listed and
described.
Characters are
listed, but there
seems to be too
many or not
enough.
Description of
characters is
minimal and/or
confusing.
Characters'
names are
listed, but no
additional
information is
provided.
Excellent
Advanced tructure
Formatting For the
review has been
ollowed exactly as
guidelines stated.
Accomplished
Formatting
was followed
with only 1-2
errors
Developing
Formatting
was followed
with 2 or more
errors.
Insufficient
Format was not
followed
Mechanics
___/10pts
Exemplary
Structure of the
review flows;
easily read with
smooth
transitions from
paragraph to
paragraph and
section to
section. The
sequence of
topics is in
logical order.
Summary,
Critique and
Recommen--
dations are at
evaluating level
and clearly
identified.
Exemplary
Review has
been proofread
and revised; no
errors in
spelling,
mechanics and
or grammar
Accomplished
Structure of the
review flows
and is easily
read but some
transitions are
faulty or
missing. The
sequence is not
logical or is
mixed up in
order.
Summary,
Critique and
Recommen-
dations are at
analysis level
and are clearly
identified.
Accomplished
Review has
been proofread
and revised;
1-2 errors in
spelling,
mechanics and
or grammar
Developing
Structure of the
review lacks
flow and is not
easily read.
Transitions are
faulty or
missing. The
sequence is not
logical nor is it
cohesive.
Summary,
Critique and
Recommen-
dations included
are at applying
level and/or not
clearly
identified.
Developing
Review has
been proofread
and revised;
3 or more errors
in spelling,
mechanics and
or grammar
Insufficient
Structure is
lacking. Flow is
lacking and
transitions are
missing. The
sequence is
missing and
there is no
cohesion.
Summary,
Critique and
Recommen-
dations not
included or are
at remembering
or
understanding
level and/or not
identified.
Insufficient
Review has not
been proofread
and revised;
many errors in
spelling,
mechanics and
or grammar
![Page 31: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
APA Format
___/10pts
Exemplary
Formatting for
the review has
been followed
exactly as
presented in
sample review
provided
Summary
___/20 pts
Quotes
___/10pts
Critique
___/20pts
Recommen-
dation
___/20 pts
Organization
___/10 pts
Mechanics
___/10 pts
APA Format
___/10 pts
TOTAL
POINTS
____/100 pts
Accomplished
Formatting was
followed as
presented in
sample review
provided with
only 1-2 errors
Developing
Formatting was
followed as
presented in
sample review
provided with 3
or more errors
Insufficient
Formatting as
presented in
sample review
provided was
not followed
![Page 32: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION PROGRAM Fall 2015 · 9/11/2015 · ©2015 • Access Code Card, 640 pp Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman,](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022050221/5f669b30b65b180a311e6290/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Candidate: ____________________________________
Term/Year: Fall _______ or Spring ________
Course Instructor: _______________________________
Comments: