Breaking Ground with Alternative Delivery · Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10,...
Transcript of Breaking Ground with Alternative Delivery · Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10,...
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
BREAKING GROUND WITH ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY Matt McCarter and Mike Midkiff
October 10, 2017
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
Agenda
2
10
11-20
25
3-9What is Design-Build
What we can do…our design-build legislative authority
What makes a project a good candidate for design-build?
Questions
1
2
3
5
21-24How PFD can help4
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
What is Design-Build
An alternative project delivery method to traditional design-bid-build
Primarily a construction contract that includes:
– Design
– Utility coordination and relocation
May also include:
– Right-of-way acquisition
– Obtaining environmental permits
A single contract
– fixed price
– fixed schedule
3
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017 4
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
What is Design-Build
Question: What is the range in price for past TxDOT design-build projects?
– Answer is B:
• Smallest: US 77 at $84M • Largest: IH-35 E at $1.4B
5
US
77
–C
orp
us C
hri
sti
IH-3
5 E
-D
alla
s
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017 6
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
What is Design-Build
Question: Can advancing a project as a design-build project allow TxDOT to expend
construction funds sooner than a design-bid-build project?
– Answer is A: Yes
7
$
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
NEPA/Schematic 9 months
Procurement 15 months
Contract Execution
Design 12 months
Environmental Permits 15 months
Utility Coordination 9 months
Utility Relocation 12 months
ROW Acquisition 21 months
Construction 24 months
Design-Build Timeline
What is Design-Build
Construction funds are committed at the execution of the DB contract before
completion of Utility Coordination/Relocation, ROW acquisition and/or Environmental
Permitting
8
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6Design-Bid-Build Timeline
NEPA/Schematic 9 months
Design 12 months
Environmental Permits 15 months
Utility Coordination 9 months
Utility Relocation 12 months
ROW Acquisition 24 months
Letting 3 months
Contract Execution
Construction 30 months
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
What is Design-Build
Construction funds are committed at the execution of the DB contract before
completion of Utility Coordination/Relocation, ROW acquisition and/or Environmental
Permitting
9
Design-Build Timeline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6
NEPA/Schematic 9 months
Procurement 15 months
Contract Execution
Design 12 months
Environmental Permits 15 months
Utility Coordination 9 months
Utility Relocation 12 months
ROW Acquisition 21 months
Construction 24 months
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
What we can do…our design-build legislative authority
Texas Administrative code (TAC) Rule 9.150 refers to
Texas Transportation Code (TTC) Chapter 223.242(d-1)
Subchapter F:
– Limits 3 Design-Build projects executed per Fiscal
Year
10
CONSTRUCTION DESIGN
Total
Cost
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
What makes a project a good candidate for design-build?
Design-Build Cost
– >$150M
Project Development
– Project has not advanced beyond final schematic
Status and complexity of:
– Utility coordination and relocation
– Right of way acquisition
– Obtaining environmental permits
11
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
What makes a project a good candidate for design-build?
Complexity
– Would the project benefit from innovative design-
construction methodologies early in the
conceptual/schematic design phase?
– Would the project benefit from designer-contractor
integration to reduce coordination challenges?
Site Conditions
– How well are Site Conditions known? (geotechnical/
soil conditions, hazardous materials, utilities)
Alternative Delivery Support Tool
– Completed
– Documents that the project is eligible for Design-Build
12
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
What makes a project a good candidate for design-build?
Interview the three candidate projects
Discuss some of their characteristics
Choose the project that’s the ideal match for Design-Build
13
1 2 3
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
Project 1
14
1
Pro
ject
1
$850M
Complex
Approved EA/FONSI for ultimate improvement
Preliminary schematic for interim improvements
Significant utility relocation with interim/ultimate improvements and main lane and frontage reconstruction
ROW acquisition some acquired by TxDOT, some acquired by DB Contractor
Political completion commitment
before end of 2019
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
Pro
ject
2Project 2
15
2
$300M
Approved EA/FONSI for ultimate improvement
Preliminary schematic for interim improvements
Significant utility relocation with interim/ultimate improvements and electric/water
coordination/relocation
No additional ROW acquisition
Political completion commitment
Not complex
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
Project 3
16
3
Pro
ejc
t3
$84M
Low complexity typical construction of portions of
freeway/highway and adjacent frontage roads
EIS/ROD
Approved schematic design
No significant utility relocation typical utility coordination/relocation for portions of
freeway/highway and adjacent frontage roads
ROW acquisition for portions of freeway/highway and adjacent
frontage roads
No completion commitment
No significant permits typical permits are needed
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
What makes a project a good candidate for design-build?
Question: Which of the three candidate projects are good for design-build?
17
Project 1:
$850M
Complex
Approved EA/FONSI for ultimate improvement
Preliminary schematic for interim improvements
Significant utility relocation with interim/ultimate improvements and main lane and frontage reconstruction
ROW acquisition some acquired by TxDOT, some acquired by DB Contractor
Political completion commitment before end of 2019
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017 18
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
What makes a project a good candidate for design-build?
Question: Which of the three candidate projects are good for design-build?
19
$300M
Not complex
Approved EA/FONSI for ultimate improvement
Preliminary schematic for interim improvements
Significant utility relocation with interim/ultimate improvements and electric/ water coordination/relocation
No additional ROW acquisition
Political completion commitment
Project 2:
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017 20
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
What makes a project a good candidate for design-build?
Question: Which of the three candidate projects are good for design-build?
21
$84M
Low complexity typical construction of portions of freeway/ highway and adjacent frontage roads
EIS/ROD
Approved schematic design
No significant utility relocation typical utility coordination/relocation for portions of freeway/highway and adjacent frontage roads
ROW acquisition for portions of freeway/highway and adjacent frontage roads
No completion commitment
No significant permits typical permits are needed
Project 3:
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017 22
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
What makes a project a good candidate for design-build?
23
Would not meet current >$150M
minimum design-build cost
Project 1: Project 2: Project 3:
Answer: Projects 1 and 2 are good candidates for design-build.
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017 24
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
How PFD can help
25
Question: How many design-build projects has TxDOT developed/advanced?
– Answer is: C
• TxDOT has advanced 16 design-build projects
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
DFW Connector $1.36B
SH 99 Grand Parkway (GP) Segments (F1, F2, & G)
$1.57B
Loop 1604 $126M
CTTS - (SH 130 Seg 1-4) $1.4B
Horseshoe $805M
US 77 $84M
SH 71 Express Lanes $139M
SH 360 $340M
SH 99 GP Segments (H-I) $1.28B
Southern Gateway $606M
SH 249 $674M
IH-35E $1.36B
Loop 375 BWE (CDA-DB) $640M
SH 183 Midtown Express $1.04B
US 181 Harbor Bridge $963M
In Design & Construction CDA Statute: Chapter 223 Subchapter E IH-35E $1.36B
(CDA-DB)Loop 375 BWE (CDA-DB) $640M
SH 183 Midtown Express $1.04B
US 181 Harbor Bridge $963M
In Design & Construction Design-Build (DB) Statute: Chapter 223 Subchapter F (limited to 3 per FY )
Horseshoe $805M
(DESIGN-BUILD)
US 77 $84M
SH 71 Express Lanes $139M
SH 360 $340M
SH 99 GP Segments (H-I) $1.28B
Southern Gateway $606M
SH 249 $674M
In Operations and Maintenance (All Projects) DFW Connector $1.36B (CDA-DB)
SH 99 Grand Parkway (GP) Segments (F1, F2, & G)
$1.57B (CDA-DB)
Loop 1604 $126M (DESIGN-BUILD)
CTTS - (SH 130 Seg 1-4) $1.4B (DESIGN-BUILD)
How PFD can help
26
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
116 9
How PFD can help
27
We’re looking for bench depth as we’re building TxDOT’s five-year plan and
ten-year forecast.
810713 1815 54 16 121714
Breaking Ground With Alternative Delivery October 10, 2017
???
Questions
28
We are ready for your questions.
?