Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

21
NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 1 supported by reported by Facebook, Brands and TV in Germany Next10 Berlin, 10.05.2010 NEXT10 Preview

description

Preview of our study "Brands, TV & Facebook" held at Next Conference 10 in Berlin.An overview of Facebook activities of big German brands from the Top 100 TV-spenders.

Transcript of Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

Page 1: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 1

supported by reported by

Facebook, Brands and TV in Germany

Next10 Berlin, 10.05.2010

NEXT10 Preview

Page 2: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 2

supported by reported by

The typical discussion is often ideology driven.

vs.

Page 3: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 3

supported by reported by

The only thing which is important: Media usage is fundamentally changing.

&

Source: Microsoft Advertising Media Meshing 2010

73% use TV and

internet at least once per week at

the same time

49% use social

networks while watching TV

Not talking about the iChange: iPhone, iPad …

Page 4: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 4

supported by reported by

And so, the game is changing.

But the ultimate objective will always be: To create brand preference!

Source: http://www.comparethemeerkat.com/

Page 5: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 5

supported by reported by

We wanted to know:

What do the big “TV brands” actually do on Facebook (as biggest social network)?

Page 6: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 6

supported by reported by

What happens in an average week on big brands‘ Facebook pages?

Brands with official German Facebook page from the list of the top TV spender Q1/10 (excluding media brands):

1&1 Axe Bitburger BMW Burger King Coca-Cola Deutsche Telekom Dove MAN+CARE Douglas Dr. Oetker Ofenfrisch Dr. Oetker Steinofen FIAT Gillette Venus Hornbach ING-DiBa Jever KiK Lindt L‘Oréal McDonald‘s Nokia Homebase O2 Postbank Syoss Targobank Vodafone

Monday, 12.04.2010 00:00

..................................................

..................................................

..................................................

..................................................

..................................................

Sunday, 18.04.2010 23:59.

Page 7: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 7

supported by reported by

Here is what happens in an average week on big brands‘ Facebook pages!

1/3 just started in 2010

2/3 promote Facebook link on their website. 3/5 directly on their homepage. 1/4 offer to share on FB

Ø 3.578 fans/likers per brand +114 fans/likers = + 3,2%

3 admin posts 3 admin comments

94 user likes = 61% 52 user comments = 34% 8 user posts = 5%

4,3% interaction rate Interaction Rate: Proportion of all fans, which interacted with page (posts/clikes/posts/comments)/week

Page 8: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 8

supported by reported by

OK. Compared to other “TV events” there is still potential in terms of fans/likers …

Page 9: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 9

supported by reported by

But: we all know that social media/Facebook is not about reach.

So we took a closer look at what is actually happening.

And we found a very interesting pattern.

Page 10: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 10

supported by reported by

Role of Facebook: Option to be liked. Role of brand: Be present. Role of user: Be a liker.

Passive Brands No strategy

1/8 Role of Facebook: Channel for all who want to know more. Role of brand: Provide useful & interesting information. Role of user: Get and like information.

Sender Brands Push strategy

1/2

Role of Facebook: Way to get in touch. Role of brand: Listen, ask, talk, connect, interact. Role of user: Valuable/appreciated partner.

Friend Brands Interaction Strategy

1/4 Role of Facebook: Connect fans/likers. Role of brand: Give interesting input. Role of user: Make fan statements.

1/8 Host Brands Pull strategy

4 strategies how „TV brands“ use Facebook.

Page 11: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 11

supported by reported by

Role of Facebook: Option to be liked. Role of brand: Be present. Role of user: Be a liker.

Role of Facebook: Channel for all who want to know more. Role of brand: Provide useful & interesting information. Role of user: Get and like information.

Role of Facebook: Connect fans/likers. Role of brand: Give interesting input. Role of user: Make fan statements.

Role of Facebook: Way to get in touch. Role of brand: Listen, ask, talk, connect, interact. Role of user: Valuable/appreciated partner.

Interaction Rate

0,3% Interaction

Rate

3,7%

Interaction Rate

5,5% Interaction

Rate

4,3%

Passive Brands No strategy

Sender Brands Push strategy

Friend Brands Interaction Strategy

1/8 1/2

1/4 1/8 Host Brands Pull strategy

Resulting in different interaction rates.

Interaction Rate: Proportion of all fans, which interacted with page (posts/clikes/posts/comments)/week

Page 12: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 12

supported by reported by

Interaction Rate

0,3% Interaction

Rate

3,7%

Interaction Rate

5,5% Interaction

Rate

4,3%

Passive Brands No strategy

Sender Brands Push strategy

Friend Brands Interaction Strategy

1/8 1/2

1/4 1/8 Host Brands Pull strategy

Fans/Likes Growth Rate: Increase of fans/likers per week

And a different “weight” of interactions.

Lightweight

69,5% Midweight

23,0% Heavyweight

7,5%

Lightweight

43,5% Midweight

50,4% Heavyweight

6,0% Lightweight

76,2% Midweight

20,2% Heavyweight

3,6%

Page 13: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 13

supported by reported by

As attractive as brand.

Quite good due to the fact that brands do not actively focus on winning fans/likers.

Although brands‘ activity is mainly focused on gaining likers/fans, growth rate is rather moderate.

To interact in many different ways does not guarantee fan growth.

Fans/Likers Growth Rate

+4,0% Fans/Likers Growth Rate

+7,7%

Fans/Likers Growth Rate

+2,2% Fans/Likers Growth Rate

+2,0%

Passive Brands No strategy

Sender Brands Push strategy

Friend Brands Interaction Strategy

1/8 1/2

1/4 1/8 Host Brands Pull strategy

Fans/Likes Growth Rate: Increase of fans/likers per week

As well as different fans/likers growth rates.

Page 14: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 14

supported by reported by

Fans/Likers Growth Rate

+4,0% (Ø 3,2%)

Passive Brands No strategy

1/8

1/4 Nothing but the KIK

logo. Just for the Burger King

Alpha-Griller

campaign.

Interaction Rate

0,3% (Ø 4,3%)

Page 15: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 15

supported by reported by

Fans/Likers Growth Rate

+7,7% (Ø 3,2%)

Sender Brands Push strategy

1/2

Interaction Rate

3,7% (Ø 4,3%)

All about Telekom:

events, ads, corporate issues …

Targobank: All about HSV (and nothing

else)

Interaction Rate

7,8% Fans/Likers

+ 4,6%

Interaction Rate

7,2% Fans/Likers

+ 2,4%

Page 16: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 16

supported by reported by

Events

Corporate information

Product information

Competitions on website

New ad campaign

Events

Offers on website

Various sources of interesting

news

Page 17: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 17

supported by reported by

Fans/Likers Growth Rate

+2,2% (Ø 3,2%)

1/8 Host Brands Pull strategy

Pictures & movies of

BMW cars cars cars …

Bitburger competitions

Interaction Rate

5,5% (Ø 4,3%)

Interaction Rate

5,8% Fans/Likers

+ 1,4% Interaction Rate

5,4% Fans/Likers

+ 2,4%

Page 18: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 18

supported by reported by

Fans/Likers Growth Rate

+2,0% (Ø 3,2%)

Friend Brands Interaction Strategy

1/4

Interaction Rate

4,3% (Ø 4,3%)

Broad offer, a lot of input.

Clear focus on dialogue.

Questions around “Fiat Autoliebe”. Ads and

new cars.

Interaction Rate

21,3% Fans/Likers

+ 3,6%

Interaction Rate

9,6% Fans/Likers

+ 2,2%

Page 19: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 19

supported by reported by

>  Big “TV brands” are not as far behind.

>  More and more brands have an official page and some are quite professional.

>  But, there is a broad variety in stages of development.

>  To create interaction, brands need to activate. The more, the less “pull potential” a brand has.

>  Users like to like, the willingness for heavyweight interaction should not be overrated – a brand must deserve it.

>  Whatever a brand wants to do: Regular and relevant activities are of highest importance. No campaign-thinking!

>  Besides behaving as a social being, it is also worthwhile using Facebook as a channel where people have the chance to become acquainted with a brand. And brands can learn what people like. But also a more laid-back “host strategy” can be successful.

>  Overall, it is important to have an objective for Facebook activites in order to define the brand‘s own role, the role of Facebook, as well as desired likers‘ reactions – and create effect for the brand!

Key Insights.

Page 20: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 20

supported by reported by

Appendix: Fan/Likers Growth and Interaction Rate. Brand Fans/

Likers 12.03.

Fans/Likers 18.03.

Fan/Likers Growth

Fan/Likers Growth %

*Joined Facebook

Interaction Rate

ING-DiBa 366 375 9 2,5 10/2009 4,3%

Jever 285 285 0 0 04/2010 10,9%

KiK 173 173 0 0 11/2009 0%

Lindt 2.550 2.641 91 3,6 11/2009 21,3%

L‘Oréal Deutschland 272 327 55 20,2 03/2010 2,5%

McDonald‘s 6.096 6.626 530 8,7 02/2010 2,7%

Nokia Homebase 8.052 8.415 363 4,5 08/2008 6,6%

O2 4.536 4.736 200 4,4 08/2009 0,1%

Postbank 233 337 104 44,6 06/2009 5,6%

Syoss 1.494 1.623 129 8,6 03/2009 0,4%

Targobank 677 693 16 2,4 02/2010 7,2%

Axe 18.980 19.054 74 0,4 04/2009 0,7

Vodafone 9.936 10.048 112 1,1 02/2009 4,9%

Total Average 3.578 3.692 114 3,2 4,3%

Brand Fans/Likers 12.03.

Fans/Likers 18.03.

Fan/Likers Growth

Fan/Likers Growth %

*Joined Facebook

Interaction Rate

1&1 945 1.012 67 7,1 11/2009 6,5%

Bitburger 7.992 8.106 114 1,4 12/2009 5,8%

BMW 22.077 22.617 540 2,4 10/2009 5,4%

Burger King 503 510 7 1,4 08/2009 0%

Coca-Cola Deutschland 967 1.005 38 3,9 02/2009 2,8%

Deutsche Telekom 2.355 2.463 108 4,6 07/2009 7,8%

Douglas 1.993 2.285 292 14,7 12/2009 2,2%

Dove MAN+CARE 299 299 0 0 03/2010 3,0%

Dr. Oetker Ofenfrische 257 281 24 9,3 01/2010 1,1%

Dr. Oetker Steinofen Tradizionale 549 555 6 1,1 02/2010 3,1%

FIAT 536 548 12 2,2 10/2009 9,9%

Gilette Venus 89 100 11 12,4 03/2010 0%

Hornbach 805 854 49 6,1 05/2009 3,2%

Total Average 3.578 3.692 114 3,2 4,3%

Survey period 12.03.2010-18.03.10; Brands with official German Facebook page from the list of the top TV spender Q1/10 (excluding media brands) Interaction Rate: Proportion of all fans, which interacted with page (posts/clikes/posts/comments)/week

* Base: First Posting/Oldest Profile Picture

Page 21: Brands, TV and Facebook Preview Next Conference 2010 Berlin

NEXT10 Preview: Brands, TV and Facebook. 21

supported by reported by

Christiane Wenhart

[email protected]

Thank you! For all who want to know more:

Matthias Bonjer

[email protected]