BPR_notes_grp9.docx

download BPR_notes_grp9.docx

of 3

Transcript of BPR_notes_grp9.docx

  • 7/29/2019 BPR_notes_grp9.docx

    1/3

    1. Understanding current situation

    E.g.: Xerox benchmarking Case, the company benchmarks as its own target to

    achieve it, only when it knows its present situation and thus knows where it wants to

    reach. In such situations its very tasking to convince people that we are in a mess!

    2. Identification of the problem (to reengineer)

    This shows that there is a need to change

    3. Top management involvement

    As there are major changes to be taken the top management is very well to be

    involved in the process of reengineering. The act becomes top to bottom and the changes thus take place in the similar

    direction

    The reengineering is thus not just change in accounts but to realise money

    4. Recognise the situation

    E.g.: IBM throughout 90s had problems, they needed to change

    They had the branding issue similar to as the state of Bihar

    Regardless of the departments created the problems still remained

    The change of the Chief executive later brought the change to the organisationthrough reengineering

    5. The reengineering starts with the identification of the problem and recognising where the

    change has to occur for the same following has to be done

    Observe how the company was doing earlier and how is it performing now , the

    change or the shift has to be noted in account to deal with reengineering of the whole

    system and processes

    Note the effects of the inputs on the outputs visible through customers, employees,

    etc. In a jest of all the stakeholders

    6. The root cause has to be known to know the problem

    E.g.: koutons always had the problem of high inventory, the problem was identified in

    the inventory section , but the root cause was in the production department, as the

    production went on the inventory kept on increasing, it never stopped thus increasing

    the inventory

    7. There are two types of approaches for reengineering

    Big bang approach

    Evolutionary approach

  • 7/29/2019 BPR_notes_grp9.docx

    2/3

    8. Big bang approach

    It is a very radical approach for reengineering

    It is done when there is a global issue pertaining in the company

    E.g.: IBM-the entire organisation was transformed through the reengineering process

    It is traditionally based on office transformation

    They were mainly skilled to design mainframe computers The pcs market was very fragmented then

    Later RIC based machines were introduced; this was done to serve the market of

    medium sized company.

    1993 to 96 and 97 the central server was transformed to client server which had

    split applications.

    Thus IBM had to transform itself

    Then IBM was into printing, and could not recognise customers needs and track

    them which was the major market need

    One monolithic solution doesnt work for a problem; various different solutions for

    different regions are required but should be under a common guideline. Thus tailoringthe solution, keeping the basic design same

    Thus modular solutions under common framework and design to fit different

    channels; is the way to achieve success from reengineering process

    9. Steps in the big bang process

    1. contain

    the costs

    2. deliver

    customer

    service

    3.

    consistency

    4. comparethe results

    in diff.

    dept.

    5. find

    milestones

    (setup

    targets &

    methods)

  • 7/29/2019 BPR_notes_grp9.docx

    3/3

    10. Delaying customers orders can initiate market share loss

    E.g. Xerox took 6 to 7 weeks to respond to customer orders; of which the

    Japanese computers took advantage and the customers already received their

    orders through them instead of Xerox

    11. Thus the company needs to follow the global guidelines and tasks to be intact with the

    current processes and systems by proper co ordination.

    12. The success lies in the empowerment of the employees

    It is an enabler for solving complex processes and also decision making becomes

    much easier

    The biggest problem lies at the Last-Mile and we cannot ignore the customer,

    thus the responsibility and authority in the hands of the employee can stop such

    last mile issues

    Changing parameters is essential but keeping the basic principles same

    Thus bureaucracy and empowerment need to be balanced

    E.g. prices in Singapore Australia and USA is dealt in $ at the same rate there

    should be mark ups , which is to be decided by the employees themselves, thus

    standardizing the prices; making it easier to deal

    13. Part of processes which work better through benchmarking (internal & external)

    Thus seven step PDCA should be followed to achieve the same

    14. Core and sub processes-

    to satisfy customers

    customer needs change in products (cheaper though faster)

    15. central leadership is the tendency in the big bang approach

    leader has a powerful vision and drive to work but this wont work when

    culture is completely different e.g. Mahindra (auto division)

    diverse kinds of portfolios (product base) e.g. GE (20 major operating

    divisions)