Book Reviews :

of 8 /8
Book Reviews : A Quick Review of What You Should Do By Dr. Jennifer L. Bowie for Writing for Academic Publication

Embed Size (px)


Book Reviews :. A Quick Review of What You Should Do. By Dr. Jennifer L. Bowie for Writing for Academic Publication. What is a Book Review?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Book Reviews :

Page 1: Book Reviews :

Book Reviews :A Quick Review of What You Should Do

By Dr. Jennifer L. Bowie forWriting for Academic Publication

Page 2: Book Reviews :

What is a Book Review?

“[S]ignificant indicators of scholarly communication… [can be use to] trace the flow of information within and across disciplines” (Lindholm-Roomantschuk, quoted in North 1194)

“[S]mall change of academic writing” (North 349) “[S]econd class citizens” of academic publishing (Riley and

Spreitzer, quoted in Hartley 1194) “At its best, a book review is both informative and

evaluative…” (MLA Style, quoted by North 350) A mediation between author and reader with the review

writer playing both roles (Gardiner 620) Should include “’responsibility,’ ‘construction,’ and ‘self-

consciousness’” (Gardiner 622) “[T]houghtful, regardless of tone” (Cortada 35)

Page 3: Book Reviews :

What Should it Include?

According to North (pg 1205):• An early paragraph discussing what book is about and

putting the book in context• Audience information:

Who you think the best audience is How well it meet the needs of the intended audience and (if

different) the audience you think it best for May also include audience uses (good for introductory

graduate class along with…) • Critique of content and argument• Supported academic references as needed (and if

common for your journal)• Discussion of strengths and limitations• If appropriate, note how well text is supported by visuals• Information on format, length, price, and value

Page 4: Book Reviews :

How can I Make it Strong?

Include both positive and negative information and be specific

Consider the readers and the writer(s) Be straightforward and lively Take the review beyond +/- and “draw conclusions of

broad significance” (Hartley 1200) Provide fresh angles on the text (Hartley 1200) If your views changed because of the book indicate this

(Hartley 1200) Apply Haraway’s “engaged criticism” and not just

“automatic praise” (Haraway, quoted in Davis 602) Recognize the diversity of views within the disciple (Davis

604) “Tell it as you see it, yes, but frame it especially carefully”

(Davis 605)

Page 5: Book Reviews :

What Should I Avoid? From Cortada:

• Describing what the book should be, not what it is• Reviewing a book on a subject you know little about• Reviewing a book without actually reading or understanding it • Using the book review as a platform for your own issues, not the issue

of the author/book• Not telling the reader what the book is about and how it fits into the

larger context From North:

• Only including content and not including critique• Not discussing the argument of the book• Using the review to show your superiority

From Belcher• Covering everything• Using too many quotes (favor shorter quotes and paraphrasing, but try

to put most of it in your own words) Reviewing the book when you have some level of attachment or

dislike for the author or are strongly against the arguments of the book

Page 6: Book Reviews :

What General Format I Should Use?

This may change on your journal, so do check out the reviews in the journal first and chose an exemplar or two. You may also find an organization that would better for you.

Introduction/Overview• General topic• Point of view• Overview of audience• Information about the author (if appropriate)• Context of book

Summary of the book• Basis of book• General organization of book• Topic of each chapter/section

Critique• Strengths and weaknesses (Belcher suggests one paragraph each)• Errors & accuracy

Conclusion• Overall assessment/critique of strengths, weaknesses, errors, and accuracy• Evaluation of how it responds to audience needs• Statement & discussion of recommendation (or non recommendation) of book

Page 7: Book Reviews :


Page 8: Book Reviews :


Belcher, Wendy. “Writing the Academic Book Review.” accessed 3/14/07

Cortada, J. W. (1998). Five ways to be a terrible book reviewer.Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 30.1: 34–37.

Davis, Natalie Zemon. "On Reviewing. Feminist Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3. (Autumn, 1988), pp. 602-606.

Gardiner, Linda. "Remember the Reader." Feminist Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3. (Autumn, 1988), pp. 617-622.

Hartley, James. "Reading and Writing Book Reviews Across the Disciplines." JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 57(9):1194–1207, 2006

North, Stephen M. "On Book Reviews in Rhetoric and Composition." Rhetoric Review, Vol. 10, No. 2. (Spring, 1992), pp. 348-363.