Body Composition Assessment

41
Body Composition Assessment A description of assessment methods.

description

Body Composition Assessment. A description of assessment methods. Body Composition. The relative % of body weight that is fat and fat-free tissue. Why measure body comp?. Health Implications there is an ideal % fat for health reasons (prevent onset of diabetes, CHD, BP, etc…) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Body Composition Assessment

Page 1: Body Composition Assessment

Body Composition Assessment

A description of assessment methods.

Page 2: Body Composition Assessment

Body Composition

The relative % of body weight that is fat and fat-free tissue

Page 3: Body Composition Assessment

Why measure body comp?

Health Implications– there is an ideal % fat for health reasons

(prevent onset of diabetes, CHD, BP, etc…) Make BW recommendations

– can use % fat values to determine an ideal BW

– how much fat to lose versus how much muscle to gain

Page 4: Body Composition Assessment

Height - Weight Tables

Body composition is a better indicator of fitness than body weight/height. Standard height-weight tables do not provide accurate estimates of what you should weigh because they do not take into account the composition of the weight. A subject can be overweight according to these tables yet have very little body fat.

Page 5: Body Composition Assessment

For example:

Body Builder:– 5’5”– 200 pounds– overweight according to height/weight

tables– 4% body fat– ALL MUSCLE!!!

Page 6: Body Composition Assessment

Fat Mass vs. Fat-free Mass

Two Component Model Fat-free mass is composed of all of the

body's nonfat tissue including bone, muscle, organs, and connective tissue. Fat mass includes all the body’s fat along with essential fat.

Page 7: Body Composition Assessment

Essential Fat

All fat is not bad!! We need fat for padding of organs,

insulation, energy source There is a minimum amount that we need

to function daily = essential fat Gender specific

– males ~ 3%– females ~ 7%

Page 8: Body Composition Assessment

Essential Fat

Why the differences?– A male at 7% is like a female at 17%– Women are more complicated!!– Women have babies, menstrual cycles,

etc… and need more fat for the survival of the species

Page 9: Body Composition Assessment

Methods

1. Under Water Weighing (Hydrodensitometry)

2. Bioelectrical Impedance (BIA) 3. Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry

(DEXA) 4. Near-Infrared Interactance (NIR)

Page 10: Body Composition Assessment

Methods

Anthropometric Measures (anthro=body; metric=measuresbody measurements)

5. Skinfolds 6. Circumference (WHR) 7. Diameters (body typing) 8. Height (BMI) 9. Others…..??

Page 11: Body Composition Assessment

Hydrodensitometry

Used to be considered the most accurate (up for debate now that DEXA is used)

+2.5% if done with experienced subjects

Page 12: Body Composition Assessment

UWW

Fat Component - Fat (adipose)+Neural+Essential Fat– density of 0.9 g/ml

Fat-Free Component - muscle+bones+ tendons+organs– density of 1.10 g/ml

Page 13: Body Composition Assessment

UWW

Water Density ~ 1.0 g/ml (temperature of the water affects the density)

Thus, if more fat will float (fat is less dense than water)

If more muscle will sink (muscle is more dense than water)

Page 14: Body Composition Assessment

Procedures

1. Wear light clothing (swimsuit) 2. Use bathroom prior to weighing 3. Calibrate scale 4. Weight the chair or seat and

equipment 5. Measure water temp 6. Remove all air from clothing

Page 15: Body Composition Assessment

Procedures

7. Sit in seat 8. Submerge 9. Blow all air out of lungs and remain still 10. 3-10 trials; average of the highest

three 11. Subtract weight of apparatus from

average UWW

Page 16: Body Composition Assessment

Equations

% fat = 457÷BD - 4142 %fat = 495÷BD - 450

Page 17: Body Composition Assessment

Sources of Error

Not getting all air out Reading scale wrong Are not using the correct equation Estimation of RV

Page 18: Body Composition Assessment

BIA

Based on the premise that fat-free tissue is a better conductor of an electrical current (contains water and electrolytes) than fat tissue

The resistance to current flow is inversely related to FFM

Page 19: Body Composition Assessment

BIA

Abstain from eating or drinking for 4 hours prior

No exercise 12 hours prior No alcohol 48 hours prior No diuretics (caffeine) prior to

assessment

Page 20: Body Composition Assessment

Advantages

Non-invasive Safe Easy to administer Accurate on some populations Field technique

Page 21: Body Composition Assessment

Disadvantage

The accuracy has been questioned:– Skinfolds 2.4 % error– BIA 5% error– Visual 3.1% error

Race cannot be entered into the machine Children distribute water differently than

adults

Page 22: Body Composition Assessment

NIR

Based on the premise that the degree of infrared light absorption is related to the composition of the substance through which light passes

Fat and Fat-Free Mass absorb and reflect light differently

Page 23: Body Composition Assessment

Advantages

Non-invasive Safe Easy to administer Field technique

Page 24: Body Composition Assessment

Disadvantages

Cost? Is it worth it? Few Age/Gender Specific Equations Accurate?

– Futrex 5000 3.1-4.2%– Futrex 5000A 6.3%– Futrex 1000 4.8-6.3%– Sum 3 2.4-3.6– BIA 5.0-7.1%

Page 25: Body Composition Assessment

Skinfolds

Measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue at specific anatomical sites

BD or %fat is obtained with the use of equations (either population specific or generalized)

Page 26: Body Composition Assessment

SF Procedures

Take all measurements on the right side of the body

Identify and mark site Grasp skin and fat between thumb and

index finger 1cm above marked site Continue grasping at the site while

taking the measurement

Page 27: Body Composition Assessment

SF Procedures

Take at least 2-3 non-consecutive measurements - if values vary by +2mm take additional measurements

No measurements directly after exercise

Page 28: Body Composition Assessment

Sites

Chest Subscapular Midaxillary Suprailiac Abdominal Triceps Biceps Thigh Calf

Page 29: Body Composition Assessment

Equations

Jackson’s 3-site– Males - BD=1.10938-

0.0008267(sum3)+0.0000016(sum3)2-0.0002574(age)

– chest, abdomen, thigh– Females - BD=1.0994921-

0.0009929(sum3)+0.0000023(sum3)2-0.0001392(age)

– triceps, suprailiac, thigh

Page 30: Body Composition Assessment

Skinfolds

Use text table 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.9

Page 31: Body Composition Assessment

Circumferences

1. Waist to Hip Ratio 2. Determination of Body Comp

Page 32: Body Composition Assessment

Waist to Hip Ratio

Indication of the pattern of body fat distribution

Indicator of the health risks of obesity– excess trunk fat - increased risk of

hypertension, type 2 diabetes, high cholesterol, CAD, premature death

Page 33: Body Composition Assessment

Measurements

Made with a tape measure Waist - at the level of the umbilicus Hips - biggest part of the gluteals

Page 34: Body Composition Assessment

Waist to Hip Ratio

Risks increase with increasing ratios Men

– Very low risk <.95– Low risk .96-.99– High risk >1.00

Page 35: Body Composition Assessment

Waist to Hip Ratio

Risks increase with increasing ratios Women

– Very low risk <.80– Low risk .81-.84– High risk >.85

Page 36: Body Composition Assessment

Determination of Body Comp

Figure 4.5 and Table 4.4, 4.9

Page 37: Body Composition Assessment

Body Mass Index (BMI)

Ratio of a person’s weight (kg) to the height squared (m2)

Used to categorize people with respect to their degree of obesity

Not used to determine % fat Table 4.7 and Table 4.8

Page 38: Body Composition Assessment

BMI

<20 - underweight 20-25 kg/m2 - acceptable 25-29.9 kg/m2 - overweight >30.0 - obesity

Page 39: Body Composition Assessment

Calculations for Optimal BW

1. Determine % fat 2. Calculate Fat Weight

– BW * %fat ÷ 100 3. Calculate Fat-Free Weight

– BW - FW 4. Calculate Desirable Weight

– FFW ÷ (1- (desired %fat ÷ 100))

Page 40: Body Composition Assessment

Calculations

5. Calculate amount of weight that needs to be lost– BW - Desirable Weight

6. Calculate kcal deficit– 3500 kcal per pound of weight needed to be lost

7. Assuming loss of 1 pound (3500 kcals) per week, calculate # weeks to reach goal

Page 41: Body Composition Assessment

Assignment

Lab 4B