Bluestone Phase 2 Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen ... · Miscellaneous Paper EL-94-2 February 1994...

Miscellaneous Paper EL-94-2February 1994

AD-A277 688US Army Corpsof EngineersWaterways ExperimentStation

Bluestone Phase 2 Temperature andDissolved Oxygen Modeling Study

by Dorothy H. Tillman, Thomas M. ColeEnvironmental Laboratory

DTICS ELECTE DAPRO0 5 1994

Approved For Public Release; Distribution Is Unlimited

9410230

94 4 4 113 MrI Q M UA L '-c1TD 3

Prepared for U.S. Army Engineer District, Huntington

The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising,publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade namesdoes not constitute an official endorsement or appro. A of the useof such commercial products.

OPP FWNION RCYCLD PA•

Miscellaneous Paper EL-94-2February 1994

Bluestone Phase 2 Temperature andDissolved Oxygen Modeling Study

by Dorothy H. Tillman, Thomas M. Cole

Environmental Laboratory

U.S. Army Corps of EngineersWaterways Experiment Station3909 Halls Ferry RoadVicksburg, MS 39180-6199

Accesion For

NTIS CRA&IDTIC TABUnannouncedJustification .................

By .....-......................Dist. ibution I

Availability Codes

Avail and I orDist SpecialFinal report

Approvd for PWic relleae; dbtbton Is urdimi•d

DTIC QUALITY IN3PECETED Z

Prepared for U.S. Army Engineer District, Huntington502 8th StreetHuntington, WV 25701-2070

US Army Corpsof EngineersWaterways Experiment N

WATERWAYS IX MI TTO

"EMOAORMhEVN LABORATORY

WaeMyUxMimn tunCaaolgI-ublalnDt

TilimanC Dorothy H.ENMAI etNn RESARC 2 eprtr n sle x genMdln= Suy/bDoYRothy H.T LmABORAThOmaR .ClY rpae o .. Am Egne itit

117RTMRV p. &A ARM 28cmNG(INeEaeERppe; L94IncludesWAY biblioraphi refernces1.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8 Therma polltio ofrRrlks t.-Ws igna-BusOnLADe 2

Water~ ~~~~~~~~VKMIIG qu~y-Ws igna-BusoeLk ahmtclmodels. 3.1"9

EnierWaterways Experiment Sta ~ ataoion) E-94-2.l~nDt

TA7 p.: l4 ;2 cm.EL-9 (icelnou apr 2-4

Contents

Preface ............................................ v

Conversion Factors, Non-SI to SI Units of Measurement ............. vi

1- Introduction ........................................... I

Background ........................................... IStudy Objective ........................................ 1General Modeling Approach ................................ 2Site Description ........................................ 2

2- Model Description ...................................... 5

M odel Discussion ....................................... 5Data Requirements ...................................... 7

3-CE-QUAL-W2 Calibration/Verification ........................ 8

Calibration/Verification Data Sources ......................... 8Calibration ............................................ 9Verification .... ...................................... 22Sensitivity Analyses .................................... 24

4--Scenario Results ....................................... 25

5-Summary and Conclusions ................................ 27

References ............................................. 28

Appendix A: CE-QUAL-W2 Control Data Files ................... Al

Appendix B: Sensitivity Analysis Results ....................... BI

Appendix C: Scenario Results ............................... CI

SF 298

List of Figures

Figure 1. Bluestone Lake .................................. 3

Figure 2. Elevation-volume curve ............................ 9

iII

Figure 3. Predicted versus observed WSEL for 1981 .............. 10

Figure 4. Final calibration results for DO and temperature .......... 11

Figure 5. Final verification results for DO and temperature .......... 16

Figure 6. Predicted versus observed WSEL for 1983 .............. 23

iv

Preface

The report herein presents results of a modeling study on Bluestone Reser-voir, WV. The model (CE-QUAL-W2) was used to determine the effects ofincreased pool elevation and hydropower retrofitting on in-pool and releasetemperature and dissolved oxygen. This report was prepared in the Environ-mental Laboratory (EL), U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station(WES), Vicksburg, MS. The study was sponsored by the U.S. Army EngineerDistrict, Huntington, and was funded under the Military InterdepartmentalPurchase Request No. E8593HW01 dated 27 October 1992.

The Principal Investigators of this study were Ms. Dorothy H. Tillman andMr. Thomas M. Cole of the Water Quality and Contaminant Modeling Branch(WQCMB), Environmental Processes and Effects Division (EPED), EL. Thisreport was prepared by Ms. Tillman and Mr. Cole under the direct supervisionof Dr. Mark Dortch, Chief, WQCMB, and under the general supervision ofMr. Donald L. Robey, Chief, EPED, and Dr. John Harrison, Director, EL.Technical reviews by Drs. Dortch and Barry Bunch, WQCMB, are gratefullyacknowledged.

At the time of publication of this report, Director of WES wasDr. Robert W. Whalin. Commander was COL Brnce K. Howard, EN.

This report should be cited as follows:

Tillman, D. H., and Cole, T. M. (1994). "Bluestone Phase 2temperature and dissolved oxygen modeling study," MiscellaneousPaper EL-94-2, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways ExperimentStation, Vicksburg, MS.

V

Conversion Factors, Non-SI toSI Units of Measurement

Non-SI units of measurement used in this report can be converted to SI unitsas follows:

Mulmply By To Obtain

acnm 4,046.873 Square meters

cubic fe 0.02831685 cubic metr

feet 0.3048 MenrOM

miles (U.S. stutut) 1.609347 kilomewers

square mils 2.569998 squam kilometem

vi

1 Introduction

Background

The U.S. Army Engineer District, Huntington, is presently consideringraising the pool at Bluestone reservoir 11 ft1 and adding conventional, base-load hydropower. Through the Water Operations Technical Support (WOTS)program, the Huntington District contacted the U.S. Army Engineer WaterwaysExperiment Station (WES) Environmental Laboratory for recommendations onevaluating effects to water quality if the proposed modifications were made.

Personnel from WES met with the Huntington District and discussedevaluation of future water quality conditions at Bluestone Lake, WV. Recom-mendations were made on the approach to determine effects of project modifi-cations and included three phases: (a) apply the SELECT model (Daviset al. 1987) to evaluate potential dissolved oxygen (DO) of release water withhydropower assuming no change in in-pool conditions, (b) apply the time-varying, two-dimensional (laterally averaged) hydrodynamic and water qualitymodel, CE-QUAL-W2, to evaluate potential changes in in-pool and releasetemperature and DO assuming a gross water column oxygen demand for DO,and (c) apply CE-QUAL-W2 with all water quality state variables activated tomore accurately define potential changes in future in-pool and release DOinstead of having to make broad assumptions about the depletion rate.

Phase 1 of the Bluestone Water Quality Study was completed by personnelat the Huntington District with guidance from the WES Hydraulics Laboratory.The WES Environmental Laboratory conducted Phase 2 as requested by theHuntington District. Results from Phase 2 are presented in this report.

Study Objective

The Environmental Laboratory assisted the Huntington District byconducting the Phase 2 numerical modeling of temperature and DO in

SA table of factors for converting non-SI units of measurement to SI units is presented onpage vi.

Chpr 1 Iniroducion

Bluestone Lake, WV. Model results from CE-QUAL-W2 scenario runs wereused to evaluate potential changes in in-pool and release temperature and DOby raising the pool I 1 ft and adding hydropower to the project.

General Modeling Approach

This study involved applying the two-dimensional Oaterally averaged)hydrodynamic and water quality model, CE-QUAL-W2, to Bluestone Lake fortemperature and DO only. DO was modeled in a simplified manner using agross water column oxygen demand (WCOD) and a sediment oxygen demand(SOD). This approach results in more uncertainty for DO predictions. TheDO rate parameters were adjusted to match 2 years (a wet year,1983, and dryyear, 1981) of observed data. The assumption in this approach is that thechange in pool will not affect the WCOD and SOD rates. This assumption cannot be confirmed without proceeding to the recommended third phase. Thebenefit of this study was to have more confidence and greater resolution (interms of time discretization and accuracy of release DO results) than the firstphase study recommended by WES in determining impacts. Sensitivity analy-ses were also run by adjusting the SOD and WCOD rates in the calibrationand verification control data sets to see which parameter had a greater effecton DO.

After calibration/verification, two scenario runs were made: (a) raising thepool 11 ft and (b) raising the pool 11 ft and adding hydropower. Comparisonswere made between calibration/verification results and scenario results for bothyears to determine impacts to temperature and DO on in-pool and releaseconcentrations.

Site Description

Bluestone Dam has impounded the New River near Hinton, WV (Figure 1),since December 1949. It was constructed for various purposes, including floodcontrol, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. Two major tributariesdrain into Bluestone Lake, New River and Bluestone River, for a total drainagearea of 4,565 square miles. At normal summer pool (1,410 ft from 1 Aprilthrough 29 November), the surface area of 2,039 acres is created with a back-water of 10.8 miles. At normal winter pool (1,406 ft from 1 Decemberthrough 29 March), the surface area of 1,800 acres is created with a backwaterof 9.5 miles. The maximum pool elevation for flood control is 1,520 ft andcreates a backwater of 36 miles. A mean hydraulic retention time of 6 days isestimated using the 1985 growing season discharge of 3,183 cfs.

Bluestone Dam is a concrete gravity dam structure having an overallheight of 165 ft with the top elevation at 1,535 ft and bottom elevation at1,369 ft. Maximum depth of the reservoir is approximately 60 ft for normalsummer pool. Discharge is through 16 gated sluices that each measure

2 Chaptr I Introducton

Owl) BLUESTONE F/C39-C

K~~~~lEAG 1(11 (:. 1NE 8ORI

NIII ?ACC 1360.0

* ZLGAER 1527.3 1360...0URAI

BL MONROEDCO

PICESEICI ARTA INLRPOTI

CENTNCON RO

PICNIC~PPETE (M. CAPNGAEAGE ISIOI~LKBOAT~~~~ ~1 LANLN U.S CAPIGORANDARYac n il

INUMEROUSZERO R1CRATIO 3AIIIS

Chapt20 11489.76io

5 ft 8 in. wide by 10 ft high, and the center line of the openings are at elevation 1,394 ft.Penstocks have been installed for future installation of hydropower with the center line ofintakes at elevation 1,383 ft Discharge from Bluestone Lake ranges from approximately 1,000to 40,000 cfs.

4 Chapter 1 Inroducion

2 Model Description

Model Discussion

CE-QUAL-W2 is a two-dimensional model that predicts vertical and longi-tudinal variations in hydrodynamics, temperature, and constituents in a waterbody through time. The model is based upon the Generalized Longitudinal-Vertical Hydrodynamics and Transport (GLVHT) model of rivers, reservoirs,and estuaries (Buchak and Edinger 1984). Earlier versions were known as theLaterally Averaged Reservoir Model (LARM) (Buchak and Edinger 1982).Development of the GLVHT model has been ongoing since 1975 by WES andJ. E. Edinger and Associates of Wayne, PA. The GLVHT has been previouslyused to simulate temperature distributions and circulation patterns in waterbodies and has been applied to a variety of systems (Buchak and Edinger1984). The main modifications to the GLVHT model resulting in CE-QUAL-W2 were the inclusion of the algorithms to simulate water quality constituents.

CE-QUAL-W2 is based upon a finite difference solution of the laterallyaveraged equations of fluid motion including the following: (a) the free watersurface, (b) hydrostatic pressure, (c) horizontal momentum, (d) continuity,(e) constituent transport, and (f) an equation of state relating density and con-stituents including temperature and solids concentrations (dissolved andsuspended). By solving for the water surface elevation implicitly, the restric-five Courant surface gravity wave criterion is removed, allowing simulation ofreasonable time frames for field applications, such as entire stratificationcycles. An explicit scheme is then used to transport heat and chemical/biological constituents. The model has the capability of including head orflow boundary conditions, branches, multiple withdrawals, and other featuresthat allow its application to a variety of situations.

Basic features of CE-QUAL-W2 are summarized below:

a. Two-dimensional (laterally averaged) simulations of temperatures, con-stituents, and flow fields.

b. Hydrodynamic computations influenced by variable water densitycaused by temperature and dissolved and suspended solids.

ChWW 2 MOd• Dfmipm 5

c. Simulation of the interactions of numerous biologicai/chemical factorsinfluencing water quality.

d. Allowance for multiple inflow loadings and withdrawals from tributar-ies, point and nonpoint sources, precipitation, branch inflows, and out-flows from a dam.

e. Allowance for multiple branches.

f. Allowance for ice cover computations.

g. Allowance for variable time steps.

h. Allowance for flow or head boundary conditions, making it applicablefor reservoir or estuarine modeling.

i. Simulation of circulation patterns.

j. Restart capability.

k. Inclusion of evaporation in water balance.

L Heat transfer computations.

m. Variety of output options.

n. Selective withdrawal capabilities.

CE-QUAL-W2 conceptualizes the reservoir as a grid consisting of a seriesof vertical columns (segments) and horizontal rows (layers), with the numberof cells equal to the number of segments times the number of rows. The basicparameters used to define the grid are the longitudinal spacing (Ax, in meters)and the vertical spacing (h, in meters). The vertical spacing and the longitudi-nal spacing may vary spatially. Each cell also has an associated width thatrepresents an average value.

CE-QUAL-W2 currently simulates 20 water quality constituents in additionto temperature and circulation patterns. Many of the constituents arm simulatedsimply to include their effects upon other constituents of interest. The constit-uents are separated into four levels of complexity, permitting flexibility inmodel application. The first level (Table 1) includes materials that are conser-vative, noninteractive, or do not affect other materials in the first level. Thesecond level (Table 1) allows the user to simulate the interactive dynamics ofoxygen-phytoplankton-nutrients. The third level (Table 1) allows simulation ofpH and carbonate species, and the fourth level allows simulation of total iron,which is important during anoxic conditions. The model calculates in-poolwater volumes, surface elevations, densities, vertical and longitudinal veloci-ties, temperatures, and constituent concentrations as well as downstreamrelease concentrations.

6 Chapter 2 Model Descripipon

Table 1

Water Quality Constituent Levels

Level I

Conservatie racer Coliform bacteria

Inorganic suspended solids Total dissolved solids or salinity

Labil. dissolved organic matter Ammonia-nitrogen

Refractoy dissolved organic matter Nitrat-nitrogen

Phy•p•mIkn Dissolved oxygen

Detitus Organic sediments

Phosphatphosphorus

Levels

Dissolved inorganic carbon Carbon dioxide

Alkalinity Bicarbonates

pH Carbonates

STotal i ron

Data Requirements

CE-QUAL-W2 requires a database that includes in-pool initial conditions,reservoir geometry, physical coefficients, biological and chemical reactionrates, and time sequences of hydrometeorological and inflowing water qualityquantities. Observed release water quality data is also needed to evaluate pre-dicted release conditions. Calibration/verification is highly dependent on theavailability of in-pool water quality constituent concentrations at several loca-tions within the reservoir.

Chapter 2 Model Description 7

3 CE-QUAL-W2CalibrationNerification

CalibrationNerification Data Sources

The model was calibrated and verified for a dry and wet water year (1981and 1983, respectively). The different data types necessary to calibrate andverify CE-QUAL-W2 for the Bluestone system were as follows:

a. In-pool temperature and DO data for various stations in Bluestone

Lake.

b. Release data.

c. Bathymetry data.

d. Tributary inflow rates and constituent concentrations.

e. Meteorological data.

f. Water surface elevation data.

g. Dam outlet specifications.

h. Reservoir elevation-area-capacity table.

The Huntington District provided the observed in-pool, release, water surfaceelevations, and calculated inflow data for the 2 study years. The HuntingtonDistrict also provided the sediment range survey data used in calculating thereservoir geometry, elevation-volume curve, and the plans from the proposedhydropower study. Inflow temperature data were obtained from CD ROM forthe U.S. Geological Survey station New River at Glen Lyn, VA (stationnumber 03176500). Meteorological data were obtained from the U.S. AirForce Environmental Technical Applications Center in Asheville, NC, for theRoanoke, VA, and Beckley, WV, first-order meteorological stations. Datafrom the Roanoke station were used for calibration and verification because theBeckley station was missing data for the year selected for verification.

8 Chapter 3 CE-QUAL-W2 CalibraionNeufticatn

Observed in-pool data were available on a monthly basis for both year.During 1981 (calibration), observed data were available for the months ofApril through September. Consequently, the calibration period was limited tothese months. Likewise for verification, observed data were available only forthe months of May through October, which limited the simulation period tothese months.

Calibration

Before actual calibration of temperature and DO could be conducted, thewater balance of Bluestone Lake had to be accomplished. Adjustments to thebathymetry data and the elevation of the bottom datum were made to correctwater imbalances in the system. These parameters were adjusted until thepredicted elevations and volumes satisfactorily matched the elevation-area-capacity data provided by the Huntington District (Figure 2). An elevation-volume relationship was also developed from the data that predicted the water

4E7 _____________ _

11 - ELEVATION VOLUME CURVE /3E7 PREDICTED VOLUME /

i2E7

0>' 1E7

GED

416 418 420 422 424 428 428 430ELEVATION (M)

Figure 2. Elevation-volume curve

surface elevations (WSEL) based on initial reservoir volume, inflows, andoutflows of Bluestone Lake! This relationship was used to check for erroneousvalues in the inflow and outflow data. Based on the volume change resultingfrom the values of inflows and outflows being used, the predicted WSEL for1981 did not match what had been observed. The predicted WSEL variedmore than 30 ft for some days where the measured data showed very littlechange. After consultation with personnel at the Huntington District, it wassuggested that inflows calculated by the Huntington District be used instead ofthe U.S. Geological Survey data since the Glen Lyn station had problemsduring the 1980s. Once the calculated inflow data were used, predicted WSEL

Chapter 3 CE-OUAL-W2 CalibraonNerification 9

were well within the 0.5-m error considered acceptable (Environmental Labora-tory and Hydraulics Laboratory 1986). In fact, the predicted WSEL werealmost a perfect overlay of the observed values (Figure 3) excluding minorerrors (i.e., less than 0.1 m for short periods).

---- OBSERVED WSEL---- 3- PREDICTED WSEL

430.3

430.2A

430.1

S430.0

429.9

429.8

429.7

429.6180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270

JULIAN DAY

Figure 3. Predicted versus observed WSEL for 1981

Satisfactory results for hydraulic calibration allowed initiation of waterquality calibration. Temperature was calibrated first, since DO is temperaturedependent. During temperature calibration, adjustments were made to theChezy coefficient and wind sheltering coefficient (Appendix A). They wereinitially set to values recommended in the user's manual (Environmental Labo-ratory and Hydraulics Laboratory 1986). Adjusting these parameters improvedtemperature predictions. However, only after restricting the lower limit ofselective withdrawal to elevation 1,387 fk, was the thermocline predicted cor-rectly. Bluestone temperature profiles show more stratification than would beexpected from a reservoir having such a short retention time (approximately6 days at the most). For instance, hypolimnetic temperatures would have beenexpected to increase as the summer progressed. However, the observed datashowed very small changes in hypolimnetic temperatures throughout the sum-mer, especially in 1983 (see Figures 4 and 5). It is unclear why restriction ofselective withdrawal was necessary, but it was originally believed that a cofferdam was in place upstream of the dam. After checking with District person-nel, it was found out that this was not the case. Other reasons for having torestrict the selective withdrawal may be that sedimentation has occurred nearthe dam since the last sediment range survey or groundwater seepage is

10 Chapter 3 CE-QUAL-W2 CalbraionNrf#ication

Observed x

,, ,1 ,1 j, 4 8i9A 2a, f, 19,_o0 - 0

"40 a 9 t9 a a6 a48 8 9 a a2 0

4 -0 a

9 0 a.4 ýý 1-

8,4 8- 84

-. -.5 -s

0136 9a13 0369833 9 it aM MugI DO. ME V OM~gi 4

Observed xJuly 2,9 A 1 JtJy2 IA IM

3 0 0

I 4

-5 L5 -0

-m °,-.. - ,,.

I• n7g' DO, n l' DOmgr 4

Jul 28,% iU A*Jf 2 l A J2 n1 1

* oj-m -m -5.,4 -,8 -(

, l , ,. 0 6 [9I .o_

DO. ngV 1 re.mg' DC

4 4 4 s000w000w3

Figure 4. Final calibration results for DO and temperature (predicted versusobserved) (Sheet I of 5)

Chapter 3 CE-OUAL-W2 CahbratonNrificatn 11

cimimie

24 2241= 21% /m

-s mmbv -C -aesum- uram,-

-s 209 -mf~~ -mmis

02x0m1040 033A110 0 a111m00TmPers2v -c 2nparmumu -C T=Verowu -C

A* 2% mm0r kW

0-.0e 0-

--1 -9 1 5

-15 - as0 2 0 1 1 4 0 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 3L3 0J

Augut 519M W1 5 4y19M8 August 25.819o 0

4'2 -a 3 0 I2 O. 2gDo-g. mg

Fi9r 4.(het2)f5-2Cape 3m C-3 ULW abaio~rfct

Compied

August 2516M August MI=h August 25,lM

4

XX II

-.5 -5 -32

-s -5 0 t sa3a 2

August 2& 196 August M~ 1961 August M5 1I6

o 1 0 0

-0 r. .. J -.

-4 5 -0-s -u 4 s03 3 349I

DO.mgrI' Dmgv m mg V

Observed x

August254 I= August M96 August251M8

4(-03 -3

August 25, 1961 August 25 1961 August 25. 1961000

Figure 4. (Sheet 3 of 5)

ChapWs 3 CE-QUAL-W2 Cadibration/Vefritfiion 13

COWmF

kAugud 919M6 AngumL 256flM AimuuL25, 196

M-TOW -5

-5 -0 -5

Tampmvbxm OC DO.~w mg Vp~u DO Cgr

I -ttw

23 M- SIlbr2.MSqmbr2,1

-0 -5 4

*UU0 8 6 a35 0 3 6 aa'hpezcnV K O,mg IDO. mgr

Steber 23.19M1 Sqimber 23, 19M1 Sq~ambe 23% 1961

4 1 4 9 a a a

DO, mgrVMm ' DO.ngr Img 1`

Figure a 4. ,90 Sqiamb 4318 ofu~e 5),9

14 Ch pe 3J C -U L IW abao ~ rfcto

C(IuWYd -

2:%mb M018 SqMAb 018 SqAn~ 0 19M1

*6 I, 0

-6 4

eass~~~s 03 3 0030340M ~mg 1 O a 2wpinb~ IC

S.t~23. 19M1 SO~zz 23,19M1 Septembe M0198

A so 0 0

2merbi -C 1~ai 4 I-5 -m -M

-45 -13 -8

C--

Is Is 01 a0sS

'4 J*3310 0w0 0 330 w0w0 032 0340I!Pw;pip , oC T~puubx -C %mperoba -C

Fiur 4. (Set5f5

94wft 94EOA-2Clbrwefcbn1

Obw-ve x

JuAM==96 JuMM. A 86 me Um96

-s-3 -3

In mg r D% mg Dugr'mWSr

4 1 -4 4

-0 .4 -0

(Thwved x

JuneJUMI ~ 83 ~16 ime 2z 19M

-5 -3 -3I

0 0340 0533 040 033140%=PwmbiuV -C 2mpmwmu ~C 2nuputatr, -C

June 2Z M aim W 1963 Aune 2Z 19M

V 0 a 0 w00

obevd (See 1 of 5)

14848- Chpe CE-QULW /airtonefc

Observe x

A* 21 Oj 2, I=A0 261

.0 -04 4

-. b* I A 2 -98 A* 2 19M

"to o 8 4 o, i, ,ir4

*"o00

8 3 0, 0 A A

-. -5 -s

Observd x

,* 20 ,• 0 , 2D. 'B-3 -3

Fiur-. (See 2 2of25

Chpr3C-MULW -13a'o~eil~ 17

Ju 2O4UI= A* 2.UgOA* Jr2D.1983

-a a

I~~JjI


Chapiui 3 CE-OUAL-W2 CalibrationNefrafiaion 1

abmwwed x1•

August . 1M8 August 3,12I= August M 19830

0

a 24 I4 aa Sa

DO . g4 .I' D

-00 A'

.4u -u -5

0 3 0 1 z 35 0 3 R. J5u 0 i19s5,m r' DO, mg V M mg r

August 3.IM August ,. M August 19=3

*0|• 1 0 0 53 ]

-a 4-30

-- --

-0 -4 -n

-- --

JOae 10W4 Os20W 0 m 0330 a

Atugust3 fAugust Z BW August % 518

1. -a -3- s -m

0 n 1 4 1o M 100A3

Fiur . (Shee 3ao-.

Chapter 3 C -QULW aibrto~rfct

Coupdad -Ohm-rmd x

August 17.196 &Mpgst 17,LM August 17,9 -M

4 -3 -3

6~ 9 2- 2-a. a9-. -ml -u-. -u -I,

xx•, ml r" l~,ma r' mx g r'

Auustt A. 193 August 7. 1903 August 17. 1983

4 -3 -

-5 -. 13 -s-. -n

0 a 4 O a a 0 3 0 93215 0a 3 9 2 aIxmg 14 DO,mg " ,mg V'

Ob~served x

August 17, 1M6 August 17, 19M August 17, 1M6S0 *

-- 3 -

Sn I 24 ) I*S 2nmtm-Cavn-, -Ia

August 17.M3 August 17,1963 August 17. 19S

- -r• -3-a - -4a

03m304w 05590 3040 003 00'bnp~~~uz* "Czptts, oC 1matr,"


Ch~sp 3 CE-QUAL-W2 CalibratioNerificatin 1

Obseved z

Sqztmbw 2% I= September 1983 SWqmbe 2Z 198

-s-0 -3-s-4 -13

=OMgt' MMS Mg17

8.ptenbe 2 196w Ssjtuzab.w 1903 Sqtunzber 2Z 193

4 -3

.4 9 4 -x9-

-n

64 24 a2-.a i

Compute-

-3 43-30

a aI 0

200Chate 3 -OA82Glbrto~rtcto

cooling the hypolimnetic waters. District personnel may want to investigatethis further.

Temperature and DO profile results for calibration are shown in Figure 4.Ten observed temperature and DO profile data stations were available in 1981for comparison to predicted temperature and DO profiles. Table 2 lists theobserved in-pool stations and the location of each in relation to BluestoneDam. In Figure 4, DO and temperature profiles are presented for eachobserved Julian day. DO profiles are plotted first beginning with the mostupstream station proceeding in the downstream direction with the temperatureprofiles for the same day plotted next in the same order. For example, inFigure 4, the first observed Julian day is 28 July 81, and the order of theDO profile stations is 1BLN20014, IBLN20013, IBLN20012, 1BLN20011,1BLN20010, IBLN20009, 1BLN20003, 1BLN20008, IBLN20007, andIBLN20002. The temperature profiles for that day follow in the same order.

Table 2Observed Profile Stations

DistnceSaton No. from Dam, mites Segment No. 11l11 196ow

1BLN20002 0.25 31 X X

1BLN20007 1.00 29 X

1BLN20008 2.00 28 X X

1BLN20003 2.90 26 X X

1BLN20009 4.00 25 X

1BLN20010 5.00 22 X X

1BLN20011 6.00 20 X

1BLN20012 7.00 18 X X

1BLN20013 8.00 17 X

1BLN20014 9.00 15 X X

' X indicates which stations were available for that year.

Calibration temperature profile predictions for all stations compared favor-ably with the observed data. Initially, inflow temperature boundary conditionswere set to the observed Glen Lyn station temperature values. Because thisstation was approximately 15 miles upstream of the modeled boundary seg-ment, the most upstream temperatures were being overpredicted. To improvethe upstream temperature predictions, inflow temperature boundary conditionswere set to observed values at the most upstream station (IBLN20014). Thesevalues were more realistic to use as boundary conditions and helped toimprove temperature predictions in the upper reaches.

Chapter 3 CE-QUAL-W2 CalibrationNerification 21

Although DO was modeled in a simplified manner, calibration results com-pared favorably with observed data (Figure 4). Since there were no observedinflow DO data available at the Glen Lyn station, DO boundary conditionswere initially assumed to be saturated. Using saturated DO boundary condi-tions resulted in overprediction of the most upstream DO. DO boundary con-ditions were then set to the observed values at the most upstream station(IBLN20014). Initial DO predictions in the upper reaches were improved,which improved DO predictions in the downstream reaches as well.

Further calibration of DO required adjustments to the SOD and WCODrates. Initially, they were set to values recommended in the CE-QUAL-W2user's manual (Environmental Laboratory and Hydraulics Laboratory 1986).The SOD and WCOD rates were not varied longitudinally, but were set thesame for all segments. After adjusting the SOD and WCOD parameters, DOprofiles were improved at some stations, but were worse at others. Since thereare many factors (i.e., inflow, allochthonous inputs, algal photosynthesis andrespiration, and wind) influencing DO concentrations throughout a reservoir(Cole and Hannan 1990), it was decided that SOD and WCOD rates should bevaried longitudinally. DO profile predictions were then significantly improvedthroughout the reservoir. Final SOD and WCOD rates are shown inAppendix A.

Many of the disparities between predicted DO and observed (especially inthe epilimnion on 25 July 1981 and 25 August 1981, at stations IBLN20002,IBLN20007, IBLN20008, and 1BLN20003) were attributed to algal produc-tion, which was not simulated by CE-QUAL-W2 during this phase of thestudy. Since DO was supersaturated, the higher DO values observed in theepilimnion could not be predicted without the inclusion of algae as a modeledconstituent.

Assessment of model performance for release conditions was conducted bycomparing predicted release conditions to observed conditions at a station500 ft downstream of the dam. Release temperature for both years comparedfavorably with predicted values; however, predicted release DO was consider-ably lower than observed values. This was probably due in part to reaerationand the inability to predict the higher DO values in the epilimnion caused byalgal production.

Verification

During verification, inflow temperature and DO boundary conditions wereset using the same procedure for calibration. All other parameters (e.g., Chezycoefficient and wind sheltering coefficient) were also set the same as duringcalibration (Appendix A). This included having to restrict selective withdrawalat the same elevation to correctly predict the thermocline. If restricting theselective withdrawal had only been necessary for 1 year, then doing this wouldhave been suspect; but having to do this for both years indicated that some-thing is influencing the temperature profiles in this region of the reservoir.

22 Chapter 3 CE-QUAL-W2 CafibrabaonVerificat

Although not conclusive, this would indicate that if the withdrawal zone wasnot being restricted, anoxia would not be so prevalent in this zone. Conse-quently, the system would be flushed out with such a short residence time.

Results for verification am shown in Figure 5. Six observed temperatureand DO profile data stations were available in 1983 for comparison of predict-ed values (Figure 5). Verification results are plotted the same as calibration.Each set of plots has, for each observed Julian day, DO profiles plotted firstbeginning with the most upstream station proceeding in the downstream direc-tion with the temperature profiles plotted next in the same order. For example,in Figure 5, for the first observed Julian day, the order of the DO profilestations is lBLN20014, lBLN20012, IBLN20010, IBLN20003, IBLN20008,and 1BLN20002. The temperature profiles for the same day follow.

An acceptable water balance was obtained for verification. The predictedWSEL was well within 0.5 m tolerance considered acceptable (Figure 6).

- OBSERVED WSEL 1430.4 PREDICTED WSEL

430.3

430.2

430.1p

430.0 1429.9

429.8

429.7

49 40 160 180 200 220 240 260 280

JULIAN DAY

Figure 6. Predicted versus observed WSEL for 1983

Verification temperature and DO profile predictions for all stations also com-pared favorably with the observed data (Figure 5). As in the case of calibra-tion, many of the disparities between predicted and observed DO in theepilimnion (i.e., on 3 August 1983, at stations IBLN20002, lBLN20008,1BLN20003, and lBLN20010) were attributed to algal production. Sincesources of DO other than reaeration were not being modeled, the higher DOvalues observed in the epilinmion could not be predicted. On 22 September1983, DO predictions (Figure 5) indicate overturn has occurred for most of thereservoir except at station lBLN20002; however, this was not indicated by

Chapter 3 CE-QUAL-W2 CalibralionNerdfication 23

observed profile data. The exact date of overturn is difficult to predict becauseof limitations in meteorological data (i.e., met stations may be quite a distancefrom the project). As a result, predicted overturn is often a few days off fromobserved.

Sensitivity Analyses

Sensitivity analyses were performed on the SOD and WCOD rates to assessthe uncertainty of these parameters on results and conclusions. SOD andWCOD rates were increased and decreased 50 percent using the calibration/verification control data files. Comparisons were made between calibration/verification results (Figures 4 and 5) and results from the sensitivity analyses(Figures Bl-B8).

Increasing and decreasing the SOD rate for both years (Figures BI and B2for 1981 and Figures B5 and B6 for 1983) showed very little change in thepredicted DO when compared with calibration/verification results. This wasalso seen in the release DO results (Figures B9 and B 10). The SOD resultsoverlay the calibration and verification results. Since the SOD only affects theDO concentrations at the sediment-water interface, these results are reasonable.

Adjustments to WCOD rates for both years affected DO more than adjust-ments to the SOD rates as demonstrated in Figures B3 and B4 for 1981, andFigures B7 and B8 for 1983. When WCOD rates were increased for bothyears, the DO values in the entire water column were decreased vertically aswell as longitudinally. Increasing WCOD rates caused release DO values to beless than calibration/verification release (Figures B9 and B10). When WCODrates were decreased (Figures B4 and B8) for both years, DO values in theentire water column were increased vertically and longitudinally. This causedthe release DO values to be higher in comparison to calibration/verificationrelease results (Figures B9 and B10).

Results from the sensitivity analyses showed that DO in the model is mostsensitive to values specified for WCOD.

24 Chapter 3 CE-QUAL-W2 CalibrationNerification

4 Scenario Results

Changes in in-pool and release conditions were assessed by comparingscenario results to calibration and verification results. Two proposed modifica-tions to the Bluestone project were simulated. Scenario 1 (Figure Cl) con-sisted of raising the pool 11 ft. Scenario 2 consisted of raising the pool 11 ftas well as adding hydropower (Figure C2). For all runs, no reaeration throughthe sluice gates or penstocks was assumed to occur. In Scenario 1, the dis-charge, location, and dimensions of the intake structure were assumed to be thesame as in calibration/verification runs. In Scenario 2, the discharge remainedthe same as the other runs, but the location and dimensions of the intake struc-ture were changed to conform with the proposed project plans for Bluestonehydropower. Selective withdrawal remained restricted during the scenario runssince calibration/verification rins indicated this was necessary to simulate thesystem. If selective withdrawal was not being restricted, Scenario 2 resultsmay be slightly different since the penstock location is deeper in the reservoirthan the sluice gates. This should cause DO release concentrations to be lowerthan calibration/verification results.

Comparisons of release temperature and DO between calibration (1981),Scenario 1, and Scenario 2 are presented in Figure C3. Differences betweencalibration release results and Scenario I and Scenario 2 release results areshown in Figure C4. In Figure C4, differences were calculated as calibrationtemperature or DO minus Scenario I temperature or DO (represented by thedotted line), and as calibration temperature or DO minus Scenario 2 tempera-ture or DO (represented by the dashed line). Similar comparison plots anddifference plots for the verification year (1983) are shown in Figures C5and C6, respectively.

Temperature profile results from Scenario 1 for both years (Figure Cl)demonstrate that raising the pool 11 ft causes the thermocline to be shifteddeeper in the reservoir. This causes the release temperatures for both years tobe, on the average, cooler than calibration/verification results until aroundJulian day 220 (Figures C4 and C6). Although the thermocline is deeper inthe reservoir than during calibration and verification, with the higher pool, it isat a higher elevation in relation to the outlet resulting in cooler water beingwithdrawn. After Julian day 220, temperature releases were, on the average,wanner (maximum difference 1.1 °Q than calibration/verification results. This

25Chapter 4 Scsnario Resulb

was especially true for the dry year (1981). Comparison of releasetemperatures in Figures C3 and CS shows that adding hydropower had verylittle effect on release temperature results. The mean release temperltures forthe calibration, Scenario 1, and Scenario 2 simulations using 1981 input datawere 24.92, 25.01, and 25.03 OC, respectively, and the mean release tempera-tures for the verification, Scenario 1, and Scenario 2 simulations using 1983input data were 25.02, 24.86, and 24.84 OC, respectively.

DO profiles for both years (Figure Cl) for Scenario I show that because ofthe deeper thermocline, higher DO values occur deeper in the reservoir. Thisis also seen in Scenario 2 results (Figure C2). Differences in DO resultsshown in Figures C4 and C6 indicate that, on the average, lower DO values(maximum diffebree approximately 5 mg/U for 1981 and 3 mg/I for 1983)were released for both scenarios in comparison with calibration/verificationreleases. The mean release DO concentrations for calibration, Scenario 1, andScenario 2 simulations for 1981 were 5.43, 4.82, and 4.87 mg/U, respectively,and the mean release DO concentrations for verification, Scenario 1, and Sce-nario 2 simulations for 1983 were 5.88, 5.42, and 5.42 mg/U respectively.Lower DO values were due to more of the hypolinmetic DO being availablefor withdrawal. The greatest DO difference between the two scenarios (Fig-ures C4 and C6) occurs between Julian day 255 and day 265 for both years.This difference may have resulted from the timing of overturn and the differ-ence in the withdrawal zone caused by the different intake locations anddimensions.

26 Chapter 4 Scenario Results

5 Summary and Conclusions

CE-QUAL-W2 was applied to Bluestone Lake, WV, to evaluate impacts toin-pool and release temperature and DO. The model was calibrated and veri-fied for a dry and wet year (1981 and 1983, respectively). After calibration/verification, sensitivity analyses were performed on the SOD and WCOD rates.Two scenario runs were simulated looking at (a) raising the pool I 1 ft and(b) raising the pool I I ft and adding hydropower.

Raising the pool 11 ft and adding hydropower caused changes in bothin-pool and release temperature and DO when compared with calibration andverification results. From the two scenarios simulated, the following conclu-sions were derived:

a. Temperature profiles for most stations (especially stations closer to thedam) showed deeper thermoclines resulting in higher DO values deeperin the reservoir. Release temperatures increased as much as 1.1 *C.Most of the higher release temperatures occurred during the latter halfof the simulation for both years. Average release temperatures for thesimulation period were similar in value between calibration/verificationand the scenario results.

b. The average decrease in DO releases was approximately 0.6 mg/U forboth years. Decreases in release DO occurred throughout the simula-tion period.

c. The addition of hydropower (Scenario 2 Figure C2) did not signifi-candy affect temperature and DO results when compared with Sce-nario I results (Figure Cl). Selective withdrawal was restricted forthese runs since this was necessary to calibrate and verify the model.Late in the study, Scenario 2 was rerun for both years with selectivewithdrawal not being restricted. In these runs, temperature profileresults for both years showed very little thermal stratification. In addi-tion, DO profile concentrations were also higher and deeper in thereservoir, and the mean release DO concentrations were about the sameas Scenario 2 results. The plots from these runs have not been includedin the report, but can be obtained upon request.

Chptsr 5 Summwy nd Condusions 27

References

Buchak, E. M., and Edinger, J. E. (1982). "User's guide for LARM2: Alongitudinal-vertical, time varying hydrodynamic reservoir model," Instruc-tion Report E-82-3, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,Vicksburg, MS.

• (1984). "Generalized longitudinal-vertical hydrodynamics andtransport: Development, programming and applications," ContractNo. DACW 39-84-M-1636, prepared for U.S. Army Engineer WaterwaysExperiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.

Cole, T. M., and Hamman, H. H. (1990). "Dissolved oxygen dynamics," Rese-rvoir limnology ecological perspectives. Kent W. Thornton, Bruce L.Kimmel, and Forrest E. Payne, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

Davis, J. E., Holland, J. P., Schneider, M. L., and Wilhelms, S. C. (1987)."SELECT: A numerical, one-dimensional model for selective withdrawal,"Instructional Report E-87-2, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways ExperimentStation, Vicksburg, MS.

Environmental and Hydraulics Laboratories. (1986). "CE-QUAL-W2: Anumerical two-dimensional, laterally averaged model of hydrodynamics andwater quality-, User's manual," Instruction Report E-86-5, U.S. ArmyEngineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg. MS.

28 e no

Appendix ACE-QUAL-W2 Control DataFiles

Applndx A CE-OUAL-W2 Control Data Files Al

Bluestone Reservoir Control File for CE-QUAL-W2

TITLE C .............................. TITLE ....... ...............................Bluestone Reservoir calibration - run 24Adjusted inflow temperatures & DO concentrationsHyd - CHEZY - 50.0, WSC - 0.7, KBSW - 28, dltf - 0.5WQ - SOD - variable, WCOD - variable

TIME CON THSTRT TREND YEAR180.85 265.85 1981

DLT CON NDT NINDLT1 1.0

DLT DATE DLTD DLTD DLTD DLTD DLTD DLTD DLTD DLTD DLTr0.0

DLT MAX DLTKAX DLTKAX DLTMAX DLTMAX DLTNAX DLTMAX DLTMAX DLTKAX DLTKAX3600.0

DLT FEN DLTF DLTF DLTF DLTF DLTF DLTF DLTF DLTF DLTF0.50

SURFACE XT DATUM15 417.3

BRANCH G US DS USS DHS PHIOBr 1 2 31 0 0 3.142Br 2 34 37 0 29 3.142

LOCATION LAT LONG37.6 80.9

INIT CND IT2 IICETH WTYPE-1.0 0.0 FRESH

CALCULAT VBC NBC PQC PQTC EVC PRCOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF

INTERPOL INFIC TRIC DTRIC HDIC OUTIC WDIC METICON OFF OFF OFF ON OFF ON

DEAD SEA WINDC QINC QOUTC HEATCON ON ON ON

ICE COVER ICEC SLICE SWTEX ALBEDO HWI BETAI GAMDAI ICEMIN ICET2OFF DETAIL TERM 0.25 10.0 0.6 0.07 0.05 4.0

TRANSPORT SLTRC THETAQUICKEST 0 .00

WSC NUMB NWSC1

WSC DATE WSCD WSCD WSCD WSCD WSCD WSCD WSCD WSCD WSCD0.000

WSC COEF WSC WSC WSC WSC WSC WSC WSC WSC WSC0.70

A2 Appendx A CE-QuaI-W2 Control Data FiRes

ITO COEF AX IDX AZMIN DZNIN DZMAX CHEZY1.0 1.0 1.42-6 1.4E-7 1000.0 50.0

SEL WITH Swc SWC SWC SWC SWC SVC SWC SUC SWCON OFF

N STRUC NSTR NTSR USTR NSTR NSTR N5TR NSTR NSTR NSTR1 1

K BOTTOM 118W 138W K35W KBSW KBSW KBSW KBSW KBSW K35W28

SIMK TYPE SINK SINK SINK SINK SINK SINK SINK SINK SINKDr 1 LINEBr 2

B STRC s8T ZSTR ESTR 35TR E8TR ZSTR 35TR ESTR ESTRDr 1 426.5Dr 2

W STRUC WSTR WSTR WSTR WSTR WSTR WSTR WSTR ISTR WSTRDr 1 240.65Br 2

N OUTLEPT NOUT ROUT ROUT NOUT ROUT ROUT NOUT ROUT ROUT

0 LAYER ROUT ROUT ROUT ROUT ROUT ROUT ROUT KOUT ROUTBr 1Dr 2

N WORWAL NWO0

W SEGMNT IWO IWO IWO IWO IND IND IWD IWO IWO0

V LAYER IWO KWD IWO KWD KWD KWD KWO KWO KilO0

N TRISS NTR0

TRID 8KG ITR ITR ITR ITH ITR ITR ITH ITR ITR29

DST TRID DTRC DTRC OTRC DTRC OTRC DTRC DTRC OTRC DTRCOFF OFF

SNAPSHOT FORK UPRNC WPRNC TPHNCLONG OFF OFF ON

BURtT SEG- IDES? IPRS? IPRSF IPRSF IPRSF IDES? IPRS? IPRS? IPRSY2 5 10 15 20 25 30 31 35

36 37

LONG BEG IPRLF IPRLp IpRLp IPHI,? IpHy IPHI. IpRLp. IpRLF IPEL2 4 6 8 10 12 15 17 18

20 22 25 26 28 29 30 31

Appendx A CE-OUAL-W2 Control Data FilesA

SNP PUNT SNPC NSNPON 4

SNP DATE SNPD SNPD SNPD SNPD SNPD SNPD SNPD SNPD SNPD180.65 208.35 236.85 265.85

SHIP n=E SNPIP? SNIPF SNPF SNPF SNIPF SNIP? SNPF SNIP? SNPF100.0 2.0 2.0 100.0

PR? PLOT PRFC NIPUF NIPRFON 4 10

PUP DATE PUFO PRFD PUFD PRFD PR.FD PUFD PRFD PRFD PRFD180.85 208.85 236.85 265.85

PUF n=E PUF PUFF PUFPF PUFF PUFF PUFF PUFF PUFF PRFF100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

PUP SEG IPUFP IPRF IPRF IPRF IPAtF IPRF IPRF IPRP IPRF15 17 18 20 22 25 26 28 2931

TSR PLOT TSRC NTSRON 1

TSR DATE TSRD TSRD TSRD TSRD TSRD TSRD TSRD TSRD TSRD181.5

TSR FUEQ TSUF TSRF TSR? TSR? TSR? TSR? TSR? TSRF TSRF0.*25

VPL PLO0T VPLC NVPLOFF 4

VPL DAT! VPLD VPWD VPLD VPLD VPLD VpLD V!PLD VPLD VPLD181.85 209.85 237.85 266.85

VPL FUEQ VPLF VPLFP VPLF VPLF VPLF VPLF VPLF VPLF VPLF100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CPL PLOT CPLC NCPLOFF I.

CPL DAT! CPLD CPLD CPLD CPLD CPLD CPLD CPLD CPLD CPLD212.*208

CPL FUM CPLF CPLP CPLF CPLF CPLF CPLF CPLF CPLF CPLF1.0

RESTART USOC NUBO SItsCOFF 1 OFF

USO DATE MSOD UBOD USOD RSOD RSOD RSOD RSOD RSOD RSOD267.85

RSO FREQ UBOF USOF USOF RSOF RSO? RSOF USOF RSOF RSOF100.0

CST COMP CC0NPC LINIC SDC FUEQUKON OFF ON 1

A4 Appenclix A CE4>uaI-W2 Contol Data Files

CST ACT ACC ACC ACC ACC ACC ACC ACC ACC ACC

OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF

OFF OFF ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF

OFF OFF

CST ICON CIC CIC CIC CIC CIC cI c C CIC

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 -2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

CST PRNT CPRNC CPRNC CPRNC CPRNC CPRNC CPRNC CPRNC CPRNC CPRNCOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF

OFF OFF ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF

OFF OFF

CIN CON INACC INACC INACC INACC INACC INACC INACC INACC INACCON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF

OFF OFF ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF

CTR CON TRACC TRACC TRACC TRACC TRACC TRACC TRACC TRACC TRACCOFF OFF OFF ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF

CDT CON DTACC DTACC DTACC DTACC DTACC DTACC DTACC DTACC DTACCOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF

CPR CON PRACC PRACC PRACC PRACC PRACC PRACC PRACC PRACC PRACCOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF

EX COEF EXH20 EXINOR EXORG BETA0.45 0.01 0.3 0.45

COLIFORM COLQ10 COLDK1.04 1.4

S SOLIDS SSETL2.0

ALEAE AGROW AMORT AEXCR ARESP ASETL ASATUR ArADET1.5 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.14 50.0 0.80

Alr RATE AGTI AGT2 AMT3 AGT4 AGK1 AGK2 AGK3 AGK410.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 0.1 0.98 0.98 0.1

DISS ORG LABDK LRFDK REFDK0.12 0.001 0.001

DETRITUS DETDK DSETL0.08 0.35

ORG RATE ONTI ONT2 OKI OMK24.0 20.0 0.1 0.98

Appendx A CE.QUAL-W2 Control Data Files A5

SEDIMENT SEDDK0.10

S DEMAND SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD0.050 0.050 0.050 0.10 0.150 0.20 0.250 0.250 0.2500.250 0.30 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.300.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.200.150 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.150 0.150

0.10 0.050

hCOD TEMP TUCOD1.0147

NC DEMAND WCOD WCOD WCOD WCOD WCOD WCOD WCOD WCOD WCOD0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.700.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.500.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.300.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.300.30 0.30

CDOD BOD TBOD RBOD0.25 1.0147 1.85

PHOSPHOR PO4REL PARTP ARSP0.015 1.2 0.009

AMMONIA NH3REL NH3DK PARTN AHSN0.08 0.12 1.0 0.014

N13 RATE NH3T1 NH3T2 NH3K1 NH3K25.0 20.0 0.1 0.98

NITRATE NO3DK0.12

N103 RATE NO3T1 N03T2 NO3K1 N03K25.0 20.0 0.1 0.98

SED C02 C02REL0.1

IRON FEREL FESETL0.5 2.0

STOICHKtT 02NH3 O2ORG O2RESP O2ALG BIOP BION BlOC4.57 1.4 1.1 1.4 0.011 0.08 0.45

02 LIMIT O2LIN0.00

BTH FILE ............................... BTHFN. ....................................bth. npt

VPR FILE ............................... VPRFN ..................... ....... ......vpr. npt

LPR FILE ............................... LPRFN ....................................lpr.inpt

RSI FILE ............................... RSIFN ....................................

A6 Appen•ix A CE-Qual-W2 Control Data Files

rsi. npt

E FILE ............................... * ....................................net. npt

QO D FILE ............................... QWDFN ....................................not used

0QIN FILE ............................... QINFN ..............................Br 1 qin brl.nptDr I qini_.br2 .npt

TIN FILE ............................... TINFN ....................................Br 1 tinbrl.nptBr 1 tin br2.npt

CIN FILE .....I..E.................... CINFN ....................................Br 1 cin.brlnptBr 1 cinbr2.npt

QOT FILE ............................... QOTFN ....................................Br 1 qot brl.nptBr 1 qotbr2. npt

QTR FILE ............................... QTRFN .....................................Tr 1 qtrtrl.npt

TTR FILE ................................TTRPII....................................Tr 1 ttr trl.npt

CTR FILE ............................... CTRFN. ....................................Tr 1 ctr trl.npt

QDT FILE ............................... QDTFN ....................................Br 1 not usedBr 1 not used

TDT FILE ............................... TTDTFN ....................................Br 1 not usedBr 1 not used

CDT FILE ............................... CDTFN ....................................Br 1 not usedBr I not used

PRE FILE ............................... PREFN ....................................Br I not usedBr 1 not used

TPR FILE ............................... TPRFN ....................................Br 1 not usedBr 1 not used

CPR FILE ..................... CPRFN ....................................Dr 1 not usedBr 1 not used

BUN FILE. .............................. EUHFN ....................................Br 1 not usedBr 1 not used

Appendx A CE-OUAL-W2 Control Data Files A7

T FI LE ............................... FIHZZ N ....................................-r 1 not used

ar 1 not used

CU Il ............................... CUU.F ....................................ar 1 not usedor I not used

M FILE ............................... FDHZN ....................................ar 1 not usedDr 1 not used

TOM FIZE ............................... TDHFN ....................................Dr 1 not usedBr I not used

COI FILE ............................... CDHFN ....................................Dr 1 not usedBr 1 not used

SNP FILE ............................... SNPFN ....................................snprun28 .opt

TSR FZLE ............................... TSRFN ....................................ttrrun28.opt

PRP FZLE.................................. PRFF ....................................prfrun28, opt

VPL FILE ............................... VPLFN ....................................vpl.opt

CPL FILZ ............................... CPLFN....................................cpl. opt

A8 Appendx A CE-QuaI-W2 Control Data Files

Bluestone Reservoir Control File for CE-QUAL-W2

TITLE C .............................. TITLE .....................................Bluestone Reservoir 1983 verification - run 25Adjusted water surface, inflow temperatures, & DO concentrationsHyd - CIEZY - 50.0, WSC - 0.7, KBSW - 28, dltf - 0.9WQ - SOD - variable, WCOD - variable

TIME CON THSTRT TxEND YEAR158.8 264.85 1983

DLT CON EDT MINDLT1 1.0

DLT DATE DLTD DLTD DLTD DLTD DLTD DLTD DLTD DLTD DLTD0.0

DLT MAX DLTNAX DLTRAX DLTMAX DLTMAX DLTMAX DLTMAX DLTKAX DLTMAX DLTMAX3600.0

DLT FRN DLTF DLTF DLTF DLTF DLTF DLTF DLTF DLTF DLTF0.90

SURFACE ET DATUM15 417.30

BRANCH G US DS UHS DHS PHI0Br 1 2 31 0 0 3.142Br 2 34 37 0 29 3.142

LOCATION LAT LONG37.6 60.9

INIT CND IT2 IICETH WTYPE-1.0 0.0 FRESH

CALCULAT VBC NBC PQC PQTC EVC PRCOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF

INTERPOL INFIC TRIC DTRIC HDIC OUTIC WDIC METICON OFF OFF OFF ON OFF ON

DEAD SEA WINDC QINC QOUTC HEATCON ON ON ON

ICE COVER ICEC SLICE SLITEX ALBEDO HWI BETAI GANKAI ICEMIN ICET2OFF DETAIL TERM 0.25 10.0 0.6 0.07 0.05 4.0

TRANSPORT SLTRC THETAQUICKEST 0.00

WSC NUMB NWSC1

WSC DATE WSCD WSCD WSCD WSCD WSCD WSCD WSCD WSCD WSCD0.000

WSC COEF WSC WSC WSC WSC WSC WSC WSC WSC WSC0.70

Appendx A CE-OUAL-W2 Control Data Files A9

HYD CON? AX IDX AZNIN DZMIN DZNAX CHEZY1.0 1.0 1.4E-6 1.4E-7 1000.0 50.0

SEL WITH Svc SWC SWC SUC SWC SUC SWC SWC SWC0ON OFF

N STRUC NSTR NTSR NSTR NSTR NSTR NSTR 145TR NSTR NSTR1 1

K BOTTOM 158W 158W 158W KBSW 158W 158W 15SW 158W 158W28

SINK TYPE SINK SINK SINK SINK SINK SINK SINK SINK SINKBr 1 LINZDr 2

N STRUC ESTR ESTR ESTR ESTR ESTR ESTR ESTR E8TR E8TRBr 1 426.5Br 2

W STRUC 115TH 15TH WSTR WSTR WSTR WSTR WSTP WSTR 115TRDr 1 240.85Br 2

N OUTLET ROUT ROUT ROUT NOUT NOUT NOUT NOUT NOUT NOUT

0 LAYER KOUT lOUT KOUT KOUT KOUT KOUT KOUT ROUT ROUTBr 1Br 2

N WDRWAL NWD0

W1 SEGNNT IND IND IWD IWD IWD IND IWD IWD IND0

W LAYER KWD IND KWD KUD KWD KWD KWD KWD KWD0

N TRZ58 14TR0

THIS SEG ITH ITR ITR ITR ITR ITR ITR ITR ITR29

DST THIS DTRC DTRC DTRC OTRC DTRC DTRC DTRC DTRC DTRCOFF OFF

SNAPSHOT FORM UPRNC WPRNC TPP.NCLONG OFF OFF ON

SHRT SEG IPRSF IPRSF IPRSF IPRSF IPHSF I11SF IPRSF IPRSF IPRSF2 5 10 15 20 25 30 31 35

36 37

LONG SEG IPRLF IPRL? IPRLF IPRLF IPRLF IPRLF IPHLF IPRL? IPRLF2 4 6 8 10 12 15 17 18

20 22 25 26 28 29 30 31

A10 Appendx A CE-OuaI-W2 Control Data Files

SUP PRMT SNPC NSNPON 7

SNP DATE SUMD SNP SUMD SUMD SNPD SUMD SUMD SNPD SNPD

144.60 158.80 172.80 200.60 214.80 228.80 264.80 284.80

SUP FRZQ SNPF SNPF SNPF SNPF SNPF SNPF SNPF SKPF SNPF100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

PR? PLOT PRFC NPRF NI PRPON 7 6

PEP DATE PRFD PRFD PRYD PRFD PRFD PRFD PRFD PRFD PRYD155.8 172.8 200.8 214.8 228.8 264.8 284.8

PR? FREQ PR?? PEP? PRFF PRP? PRFF PRFF PR?? PR?? PRFF100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

PEP SEG IPRP IPEP IPRP IPRP IPEP IPRP IPRP IPRP IPRP15 18 22 26 28 31

TSR PLOT TSRC NTSRON 1

TSR DATE TSED TSED TSRD TSRD TSRD TSRD TSRD TEED TSED144.5

TSR 1REQ TSR? TSEP TSRF TSRP TSR? TSR? TSR? TSR? TSR?0.*25

VPL PLOT VPLc WVPLOFF 7

VPL DATE VPLD VPLD VPWD VPLD VPLD VPWD VPLD VPLD VPLD144.5 158.5 172.5 200.5 214.5 228.5 264.5 284.5

VPL FREQ VPLF VPLF VPLF VPLF VPLF VPLF VPLF VPLF VPLF100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

CPL PLOT CPLc NCPLOFF 1

CPL DATE CPLD CPLD CPLD CPLD CPLD CPLD CPLD CPLD CPLD212 .208

CPL FREQ CPLF CPLF CPLF CPLF CPLF CPLF CPLF CPLF CPLF1.0

RESTART RSOC NESO RSIC01? 1 OFF

RSO, DATE ESOD ESOD ESOD RSOD RSOD ESOD RSOD RSOD RSOD172.5

REQ FREQ ESOF ESOF RSOF RSOF RSOF RSOF ESOF RSOF RSOF100.0

CST COMP CCOKPC LINC SDC FREQUKON OFF ON 1

Appendlx A CE-QUAL-W2 Control Data FilesAl

CST ACT ACC ACC ACC ACC ACC ACC ACC ACC ACCOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF

CST ICON CIC CIC CIC CIC CIC CIC CIC CIC CIC0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0

CST PRNT CPRNC CPRNC CPRNC CPRNC CPRNC CPRNC CPRKC CPRNC CPRNCOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF

CIN CON INACC INACC INACC INACC INACC INACC xNACC INACC INACCOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF

CTR CON TRACC TRACC TRACC TRACC TRACC TRACC TRACC TRACC TRACCOFF OFF OFF ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF

CDT CON DTACC DTACC DTACC DTACC DTACC DTACC DTACC DTACC DTACCOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF

CPR CON PRACC PRACC PRACC PRACC PRACC PRACC PRACC PRACC PRACCOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFFOFF OFF

EX COEF EXH20 EXINOR EXORG BETA0.45 0.01 0.3 0.45

COLIFOIK COLQIO COLDK1.04 1.4

S SOLIDS SSETL2.0

ALGAE AGROW APORT AEXCR ARESP ASETL ASATUR ALWDET1.5 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.14 50.0 0.80

ALG RATE AGT1 AGT2 AGT3 AGT4 AGKI AGK2 AGK3 AGK410.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 0.1 0.98 0.98 0.1

DISS ORG LhBDK LRFDK REFDK0.12 0.001 0.001

DETRITUS DETDK DSETL0.08 0.35

ORG RATE ONTI1 ONT2 ONKi ONK24.0 20.0 0.1 0.98

SEDIMENT SEDDK

A12 Appendix A CE-Qual-W2 Control Data Files

0.10

S DEMAN1D SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD0.050 0.050 0.050 0.10 0.150 0.20 0.250 0.250 0.2500.250 0.30 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.300.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.200.150 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.150 0.1500.10 0.050

WCOD TEWP TWCOD1.0147

WC DDIAND WCOD WCOD WCOD WCOD WCOD WCOD WCOD WCOD WCOD0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.700.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.500.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.300.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.300.30 0.30

COOD ]UOD TBOD RBOD0.25 1.0147 1.85

PHOSPHOR PO4REL PARTP AHSP0.015 1.2 0.009

AIMMONIA NH3RZL 1H3DK PARTN AHSN0.08 0.12 1.0 0.014

NH3 RATE NH3T1 NH3T2 NH3K1 NH31K25.0 20.0 0.1 0.98

NITRATE NO3DK0.12

N03 RATE NO3T1 N03T2 NO3K1 N03K25.0 20.0 0.1 0.98

BED C02 C02REL0.1

IRON FEREL FESETL0.5 2.0

STOICHNT 02NH3 O2ORG O2RESP 02AIG BIOP BION BIOC4.57 1.4 1.1 1.4 0.011 0.08 0.45

02 LIMIT O2LI10.00

TH FILE. ............................... sTHFN .. ....................................bth. npt

VPR FILE ............................... VPRFN ....................................vpr. npt

LPR FILE ............................... LPRFN ....................................lpr. npt

SI FILE ............................... RSIFN ....................................ra . npt

Appendx A CE-QUAL-W2 Control Data Files A13

NET FILE ............................... ETFN ....................................not. npt

QWD FILE ............................... QWDFN ....................................not used

QIN FILE ............................... QINFN ....................................Br 1 qin brl.nptBr 2 qin br2.npt

TIN FILE .. ............................ TINFN ....................................Dr 1 tin br1.nptBr 2 tinbr2.npt

CIN FILE ............................... CINFN ....................................Br 1 cin brl.nptBr 2 cinrbr2.npt

GOT FIZL....E........................... QOTTF ...................................Br 1 qot brl.nptBr 2 qoitbr2 .npt

QTR FILE ............................... QTRFN ....................................Tr 1 qtr trl.npt

TTR FILE ............................... TTRFN ....................................Tr I ttr trl.npt

CTR FILE ............................... CTRFN ....................................Tr 1 ctr trl.npt

QDT FILE ............................... QDTFN ....................................Br I not usedBr 2 not used

TDT FILE ............................... TDTFN ....................................Br I not usedBr 2 not used

CDT FILE ............................... CDTFN ....................................Br 1 not usedDr 2 not used

PRE FILE ............................... PREFN ....................................Br 1 not usedDr 2 not used

TPR FILE................................ TPRFN ....................................Br 1 not usedBr 2 not used

CPR FILE ............................... CPRFN ....................................Dr I not usedBr 2 not used

EUH FILE ............................... EUHFN ....................................Br I not usedBr 2 not used

A14 Appendx A CE-Qual-W2 Control Data Files

UH FIL ............................... TUHFN ....................................3r 1 not usedDr 2 not used

CU FILE ............................... CUHFN ....................................Or 1 not usedDr 2 not used

EIDI FILE ............................... XDHFN ....................................Dr 1 not usedDr 2 not used

TDU FILE ............................... TDHFN ....................................Br 1 not usedDr 2 not used

CDR FILE ............................... CDHFN ....................................Dr 1 not usedDr 2 not used

SNP FILE ............................... SNPFN ....................................snprun29 .opt

TSR FILE ............................... TSRFN ....................................tsrrun29, opt

PUP FILE ................................... PR ....................................prrun29 .opt

VPL FILE ............................... VPLFN ....................................vpl. opt

CPL FILE ............................... CPLFN ....................................cpi. opt

Appendx A CE-QUAL-W2 Control Data Files A15

Appendix BSensitivity Analysis Results

Appenx B Sonty Analysis Rsuft BI

Obsrvd x

l* % I= Jul 28MA*2,I

34 9 94

-4 4 -9

15 aU -4 1~D06t Dmg V DO.mg V

Observed x.

-4 M- -4

04 3t I-

-5 -2% --5

""16 -L -IS

DM-rI' o-8 M * TW '- -0 -0

.4 -O -41

DO. m• DO" • 1C DO g'•

Figure B1. Sons"tvt analysis results from increasing SOD parameter 50 per-cent for 1981 (Sheet I of 5)

B2 Ap,,ndix B Senstiit Analysis Results

OMP~a-

* * 20 09 *2.lo

.- 03 -3-u -J-A -A.

S so540 03s5s3w40 0 3 40

~p.~i*r C hperstum -C Dzmpmbtan-C

Ju 2M 19M1 X* 21981 J%* 2% 19M1

ISa* 0 0

-6usu -5 -s md,%-

-5 -AU -U-

Obseved x

4 -3 I -3 1

0334 01033 0 361332

hng~ut, 25. MMl Avust m Jl August 25. 19M0 ~00

a--a

aa IL--- -_03693 40ai 0 3 6 15 0 369352

Figure Bi. (Sheet 2 of5)

APPendx B Sorsilivily Analyis RuiW B

August 2A~ 198 August 25.1981 August 25, I98o 0 o

- . 8 -9 a a

DOmmg r DO. ma V mwg"

August M~ 1981 August 256 1981 August 25. 19M1* 0

Observed x

4 I 1 A M IM Au 2 I M

-3 -3 -*3

00 a0 40 0wI

August219M August251M August 25of U-12:-5-4 -16

B40

0n A S0 sD 4 050• A040 a D 030 40

hrnemtr ~ 2 mpastumu C leuvesurem OC

B5 4 -5eci estviyA ayi e~t

Obseved x

Augus 2.1981 August25618 I= AguL1981

P S 0-41 .4

2442-4 J j. 3-5 -5 IsS a1

-m -wU .

hiut2% 196 Saotb 23. 19M1 Sqptembw 23, 1961o 0

0- 6 aIli 349J

033304 @36035 DO.mg5

SWpuber M8,19M Sq~mber M8,19M1 Sqtenber Z& 19M1o ~0 a

-5-5 -8

-g -4g -16

DO. max I'g DOmg r

Fgr .(Sh~emet 4316 ofeme 5)15 qane ~18

opmd Br iowil rdsi lssB

Sn I= 255,1 1981 Septm1ber 23 1M8

0 -04

-m-4 -5

-04

-5 4 -aI

* 303M3so40 0310294w0 010339011upm; OC IbmpffUte -C %mpershor -C

CMiUWd-(Rawved x

2%nb M518 Saoubu 2% 198 Septeber UM98* 0 j0

- I OI2v ku - ne u I C

2124

.-5 -56 -J5 -58 -5

010380 W40 @3808043D0 0 1010D8D40

el 1 wo 0c2I~tmo ~ pbm-

Fiur Ell. (See 5 of5

B6~~~ ApnlxBSsitifyAayi ett

Oubweed x

A* 2%1 0 * 21 IM0 1%1

DO wS D06 xp MA Mgjl* 2% 1Ma •za, 25. I=J*, 19foa

24 2�-

1~-34

--. --u -3-I5 --. -II

- My 21 M A* 2B 19 A* 0 1 i1133

* 00

S-4 4J-.4

--2

•-5 -u -s•

-0 -u' -.

0 3 0 9 2 0 A M 0 9 0

D 4 m -1 -!

-Is -m• -a

Figure B2. Sensitivity analysis results from decreasing SOD parameter 50 per-cent for 1981 (Sheet I of 5)

Appe~x 13 Serwilte Analpir Reuut B7

CQowvad x

* 0

9 14

-5 -0 M 04 3 04 aw0

-5 -. -m

* 0 0

J8-- -G -

o A 0u04 0 53100DM40 a 3334 12i'hnpsaub^ -C 2mpmtmus6 C DO.mguuhre,

-3n

o 04 -n

04 9-.9a1536 1 2-

DO, mgnrI' mkpamgv DO, mg r

AiurgB. Shet 25 1o6 5)ut~16 Ags ,16

B8 Apenh B onsdvit Am sis ea:

Obsoed x

DO., mg Dr m

Amgut 25.19M6 Augus 2, IOM6 August25. 19Mo0 a0

644 -.

0 a a3a

-m -- -1 3

August M 6 Augut A 1 Augut 2, M11

o 0

4 (--s--

-. -3 -3

-, -m

- - 'c ,m,,,,bjm,..-c 2mmkwr,. "c

August 25.O19 August 25~1L98L August25, IMI64 2-. 2-

02031a40 0333w40 05w1w0 w00hnpsutau "I=C hznpsIK mkmr IC hnpmmture oC

I: I

Figure B2. (Sheet 3 of 5)

Appendx B Sensitivity Analysis Result B9

Auut 5 19M1 Augs 25, M8 AugIust 25 1961

-. E- -4

Auut2 1981 SqA~ambe 23.19M1 Saptami*e 19M

* A 04apmb -4 DO zn ID0ln

Conpfted-

Obsuard x

SaAb?23,128 sectmb 25, 19M Septmber 23, 1M6

aI a If 0 a9n0

D% Mogr DO, mg 14 DO, mg 1'

Sqe r23. 1981 Sqbember 23,19M1 September 23. 1951* I 0

-12

D% ng r, D% mgI VO mg V


BlO Appencix B Sensibvity Analysi Resolts

September 23,98 Mqb ~ 91so~ 25, 1961

.4 - -5

DO, wgr D)O, wgr1'menl-

Stm 23. 1951 September 23,1901 September 2.19M1

I -3

* .0

* 19 31O040 0331040300 0 10 M31 4014a.~~" 1Tzpauubire. -C Iampawmm -C

(bowwad x

23,abe M818 Sqotinb a8 M98 sqat 23, 1961

8-.34 2 2.. J

-0 -5-

03to01so40 03310wso40 0103340IknpeauIm C Umpen~m~ -C 2mpwabnm IC

September 23. 196 September 2&.19O1 September 23, 19M1I 84

0103100 0331040 01 004MbjblreN *C ¶hnpaihrc ~ 'C ~ zpwubnA -C


Appendx B Sensitiviy Analysis Results l

A2*8 2%1 1 July 28, M AJu*28.1IM

o 0 0-34 4-3

-JI4

A.4 ... 2-. A

i~~- .4-4x••-

•4 -u -4

-u -.S -i6

DO,u m I' DO,n g r' IDO, mg"

Jub2vL 19M1 A*28 1981J Ab2M 1951

4 -4

-m-s -st

-M -g t-mWtb,--C2pfbmo

0 8 I 9 e16 0 8 8 9 fl8 It20 l4S9B1, f

502O, p n f2811981 Ju(See Io951

B12 -, B i-5 -o -,0

Figure 633. Sensitivity analysis results from increasing WCOD parameter50 percent for 1981 (Sheet 1 of 5)

612 Appendix B Sensitivity Analysis Results

Observd x

J* AM I= A* 01 o *2,

-8 ... &.o 4 v bm-

4 g -3 -

24 2~~-46 1 2s'

--I -ml -u-If .- -m

bipebO C ohpmw sth~u~r~A

A* 2B =I uy 0 II 25 1M

0 0

-s-. -sI

w3340 0 to 03 U 0104 0 iOnpmtuzw IC 2Iperstwm • DO mg V

; mrved x

August 25, I kiusy25. 951 August 2.19M1o ~00

.-0 -3 -a

-45 -Z -Z9

-5 -u -I 3* O 1031409054 03611519 "

M E Ag,, 1C DO, mg 1I

0 0 0


Appendix B Sensitivity Anayis Results B13

Obmseve x

August25, M6 August 2,1f IM ugust 25.

• o ,-84 (1 -1 )4

-- -f -3

nO, m-l". o -6 ' l. •I,-na 0 0 5 6 0 Rio$Q0

DOmgr Xngr' mc mgr4

August 25 191 ugu 25, 19M1 Augut 25 I=o ) 0 a 0 I t

-6-3 -a

-. 80

-Z -S

•: -.3

2-. 6-. 2-.• •J..• stn

-4-4 -4

,-04.-

, 04D10 40 a a as40hzzpuizir -C 2npftatume -C %psvmure -C

Auut 5 1961 August M 1961B August 2k M9

0 x 0 w0 0a


B14Appendix B Sefsi~vity Analysis Results

Cmuted-Obsrvd x

hAwst 25, U&hAugust.25, 96L AmLig 25,

-. -M -.

-3c - mffm -m2qwbf%-

August 256 1981 3Vun. Z& 198 Sqtanber 2 19M1

m 1 2: a 50 l

-m -m -u-

Observed x

Sqber 23, I=8 Sadbe 23,19M September 2: 19M1

-m-3 0-3 j

0M aI -m 9 50369i

DOmgJ' DO,magIr DO, mg r

SqAamber 231M0 Sqkeznber 23.1981 Septaiber 1981o S 0

-3 1 -2 -

-46 -0 -15

-0 _ -Ia-I0 3 6 9 A 1 0 0iz 1 0 3 6 9 n

DOmgr M m r Ig


Appendx B Sensmiity Analysis Pmulis B15

* a' 0

4 -4

-. -I -6

Sqtmw Zw w6 101 0 1961a

4mam -a 2ualu 4

8... 0

-4 - -4

-M-0 -0

*0 w34 03140 05A033m0'k~~~pu=Pmw SCInauueC 7mnaqxreum oc

B16.64enfi Jest~t Anaysi Reut

0 Jul,* 2 , lIM Jul 2 .lIM

A*i 24 I=

S 41 -4 J

4

.4 .- .-.

=48 -s -5-i s -i

-1 .

- Mgr' g OM-g' DM MI'

-m~e -

J* 2% N~ A*2018 A=

-4 1,4 4 -

-im - 5

-

- - -

DO, mg Dmgr1 4

, Jui y 2o 61e Ju~i f • l 8 Ju 2#• fl 8

- 4 4 j

4

-s -2% ,-5A*

-U -M -4m

0 8 iJ I Ii 60 8 I lt ti0

8 I B

Fiu, B4 S " y 4r fro di 4CO n rau0 9ercerd for 1981 (Sheet 11of5

,-18 -Bit -AB-5 ,45

-i U

0 U=40 @I 0 4 i

5-5 50i4 0i

Figure 614. Sensitivty analysis resutts from decreasing WCOD parameter

50 percent for 1981 (Sheet 1 of 5)

Appendix B Se nsitivi ty Analysis Results

B 17

CoquswvmiObserved x

"July 281I•M 2 h 1981 ,y 21, 1961* ~00

4 4 - ,GL I

•-8 -3 -

-.4 _6

•-18 t , --3 I-5I

63 JD M0 40 a AD 0s40 400 8U

*~A 25.98 U 1961 A*~ 2% 1981

-.

-46 - --

-3 pvw -3 -3~sj C mwtm-

Observed x

Jul1981 My t21IM August2 = .1.0 0 0

Du I" ).m I- IO • "

-6- 3-

Fiur B. (Sheet2 of 5

B182

A ex-1 -t

0 a0a w a 0 0 504m0 016 12235ThnPeutifr. -C mmpezutzn mC In ~g V

amugut 25,1961l August 25, 1951 August 25. 1980 0 0

-6 .3

-12 -12 -12

0 536 11 05 - 3 9 a

DO. mg I' Do. m VDO m


BIB Appencix B Sensitivity Analysis Results

Obmved x

AauVIt 256 196 August 25 1961 August 25, 1961o0 0x

-4- 3

-. a5 9-35a 925

m mzg 14 DOXmgr mOmg14

h 4 t 5191August 21% 1981rm = August W4 198

o 0

-42- -n -

0 3 49 21503 0569 21 0 36a935DO ngr DO. ingr1' mO ngr

Obseved x

Angust25%1961 August M MO August25Z69I=

-.3 -3 .

0 v3m a40 0 10330400 0 30 NM40

bxx--a% TC Tmpmture, C bpmtbur, -C

&agut m518 A=ugust 2m,196 Augustm am.96

6-a --GsI 1 --

-5-18 -wa01o010 100 0 10 M W040 05M1W1W40


Appenclx B Sensitivity Analysis ROsultsB1

Obsred x

Augut25. 1Q& A M I gu 25 Mt2 IM!

0 0

- 1 1

*c Umpertum -C 2p_ ai -C

44 -O

-IE -I-5-5 -tua 00 40 -. l 4 9 1 0 - 6 5 a

easasoos DO. m IO.agYhpt23, 19M Sqeunb 23. 1981 Septmbe 2:% 19M

-0 0

94 1 9 n a

4 16 - 4 (I 0 -8 x/x

-1. -5 -5

0 3 -43A150 4 9L s03 89a

1DO, 2x " DlO, mgr l",ma1"

Figure B4. (Sheet 4 of 51

B20 Appendix B Sensitity Analyss Results

Observed x

SqWAnb~2,91S~w 25.I s I=8 Septmnb 23. 101

sY I

-m- -0

=amnbe 23,86 S*.bu 2& I=8 Sq*mnbur M 1981

N a- a:-5 -a -6

*0 30 S040 0 0 31040 010 m3D504%mipmbn% -C %mftauhn -C Ihmpmxbnr. -C

Observed x

&Vmanbe 23,198 satbs m318 Steymaber M3 18M0 0 - 0

-3.

* 33 0 40 0330 I 040 01V0330 40kMzpmftmu, C ¶knpmbir, -C 12mpmwmr. C

Sq~an I= 23191 qtba 2& 19M &-$ember 231M6

0 0

a a-6

-5 -n

* 310 MW40 @3350 w40 010305 104


Appenclx B Sensitivity Analysis Results B21

Obseved x

JLn ., 1963 June P. 186 June LP, 1880 0

-4 -- 38 -

4 2-. �-

a a. aaa

June 2. 19w June 2z 1963 Amne 2Z, 183DO. mg. I'W w O.m'0: -

-4

40 -0

W, 16 JuM Iz 19o Ame 1863

*-1 .4 0-

-4 =41 -8

w= ..0 -0,-it -13 -It

Figure B35. Sensitivt analysis results from increasing SOD parameter 50 per-cent for 1983 (Sheet 1 of 5)

B22 Appendlix 8 Sensitivity Analysis Results

Observed x

July246 MyA*8D I 1uly h2m.1983*0 0.

rag - mrm - g

-* M. I= A

in6-3 056333 li 0 6 133 i

DO. mg rD6 i DO, mgr

Ju* m016 Im a 20. 1= A*~ 2D. 196o 0 0

4 -3-4

-s -3

x163 030a 1 016,33

July20. 1963 A* 2. IS Jt* 2D1983* 0 30

2-4 1 2-. -.

-3-4 -6

0 30 03D40 0 10 031040 01031040ahzpaatumn 'C 'hmpsmtw. -C hpauatume -C

Fiur B. (See-2of5

Ap1end I8A ios~tyAayssR}u 2

Observd x

-0-

August 3.1883 August 3. I=6 Augut M3.I=

0 4

S-4 --0 e

m -- -

-B --u --

*se~~bsmve xssseo~

-- DO ' ' "gr 'Mil IX i g'

Ags , IM A ugust5 h3, 1M8 August M 1M6 0

4 -. 4-

0-4

-O -3

-0 -9 -1-

0 A s0 9I m a6

August %I=0 August 3. 1M8 August M 1983

]9

* A j 0 A 0 3

..4 -, -424 1 -4 24

-,g -B5 -(-24 -me -1 8

,Angu• 3,.983 Auus 3.0 Auus 3.1983

* E 0

B2 Ape.• OSesi4it Ajlsi Rsut

Obseved x

August V7.98 August 17V98 August V,1M.90 0

-4 3-3

84 x -4 24

.4 -m -

-4B . -U

@1 a 15 656a 35 030122it

August 1 7,18 Auguspt V7.193 August 17.1983

o s ~ no 0,,o seo

- --

g -9-' -41

-0 -s

-U II .4 i -Ia

,-0 -0 _0

=.I .-1 -1

5.. *II ,1 III 2 2-.II

Figure -5. (-3 4 9 5C -mpute -B

August 1ZY 196 August V7.98 August 1V,19U3o0

0t

-5 -Is -52pbu,-

-15 -1 1

o w0500 03103w40 03303040'hnpezutui -C 1kmapersw -C I!pmsuxe, -C


Appendix 8 Sensitivity pAna4ys Pesutdts B25

Observe x

1963w2? I Sqmjgbw 2Z 196 Sep 1p9I

-5-3 -3

-L -. -A.

DOmg r mna D r

8qtnb o196 Sqtsmbe 2Z 1903 3qt~b 2z 19

4L -a L L L-

DOmgr' Dogr' mOmgl'

Obwverd x

-55 _J5

0333040a010; 3040 0 1030 0¶hnpumur -C bizperebm*C 2npwdmur% -C

Sq*taber 2Z96 Sqjtuzw Z 1963

112-41 -56-M L -Is

toS 10101400 0 U03304I=nPffmi'm -C 1mwarmbami -C

Figure B5. (Sheet 501f 5)

B26 Appenclix B Sensitivity Analysis Results

* •S•II a Itm * Ia i• s L

84 2' 1-. 2- . 1 m

-. -s -3

- --. - r

- 31 335 06 133 - 11

"18 , , , , , .' = I gr'

* Ii0 0

-nner 1L4 3 -1-4

2.4 8-. 2

Jue2P, IM June 2z 198 Ame2 zz i11 '1!-. -3 -3

-a -J -5

Figure=V B6. Sestiiy nyirsltrom derasin SOD parmeter50 pe-

ame 2o 1983 Junee 1 of June 2 1M* 0S0

-5 -. -S3

bnpmberixi -C TnPersham -C TpuM4 -C

Fiur B.enitJu y ne lsi reut 1rom deneasn SO 1903amete 50 198-

cent fo93 (Shee 1 of 5)

Figureli B6 Sensitivity analysis enls reBt2rmdcraigSDpraee70pr

Observd x

July 20. 9mA*mIA*2.1* i 0

-5~ --A-

-s -. -

o 0 0

DM -g -5MI m

-. -u -.

o j0 04

1 -4

-5-a -4-u-0 -0

* 0m 00

Fiur B. (See 2- of 5

B28 Appenclix B Sensitivity Analysis Restit

Observd x

* 0 0

S41 1 0 .30-4

-m -u5 --sJ- -10

m ~mg 14 D~D. mg DOmgr'

August a. mme hI4Ui 3. I=6 August 3.1983

- -a4 1

.4 a4 -u 309nA0

-5 -3 -Ia-

Observed x

August IM August 3. IWI August 3,18

-00

0 0uu 40 a 03D03SO40 0 31050 40i~ptre, *'C 2mopenabuz'I 2C 1erotume -C

Figure B6.I (Sheet 3. of 5)stM

-B22

Apponcix B Seonsitivity Analysis ResultsB2

9-.

Auguat . m7 18 Augus 17.13 August V. SW0

-0 -0

0 34 9a a3 6569 5 0 3 a932DOMgr' mlaigr MOmar

Obftwvs x

August 17. 198 August V,~ I= AUgust 17, IM3

-41

-3-a "L- -mb amure, -C Sm "uC %xmvuesw -C

August A N98 Amagut V. I=o haUst r?. 19m

-5 -08-

6300

APPenclx 8 Sensitivity Analysis ls~ufts

Oburwmd x

Sgptmnbw 2p 196 Saptnbr 2P 196 soo 196=

1 9 2 0 11 a0aa

in9Is935 05693 09A93sDOmgr'DO Y17

mm*nh Smt1903 2 19M3 so 19I=

-3 -30

-m -E -s-0 -0 -4*

95693go54 03A 09N14 0309 40

Sqtanba ZZ 1963 Sqemnbe 2Z 1963SMn~~16

-is5 -ES-i

* i


Appenclix B Sensitivity Anajysis ResultsB3

(Rawo ed x

jAm 2Z 19M June M 196M June LM96

o 0 0

4o I-I -3--

• -8. -0 l9 a a a II iS I) atJO8 9 a 35

DO, mg•r D" mn r4 DO, mg r

June 2 1983 Jue 2 1983 June z I98o 0 1

-a

0 3 49 2 1 0 369 1215 0 36 93a3DO.mIg D).zl" DM mglV

Observed xJune 2 1963 June = 1983 June 2 1963

* 0-0

"4 Ij "-

49 -3 "

0 D03D30 0soM33340 I;AM*-PWAI -C -C

Fiur B7. Senstvy anlyi resuts fro incesing C ODI paamte

ue for 1983 Juneet .198 J1 o 51983

B / /-5 -m2 -.

Figure B7. Sensitivity analysis results from increasing WOOD parameter

50 percent for 1983 (Sheet 1 of 5)

B,•Appendix BSensitmivity Anaiysi RssuI•

Observed z

-4 -3 -3

1 0 . 0 #

-5

-U a- a6 2aa3 a 92

Dogr' DoMSr' DOmgr

Juy2D. I= A 20 6 19e3 Ju 206 19M8

0 0-

-5-4 -4

0 w i 80 )1

Figure 27. (See 201 5)

Appeix BSenitivty Aalyis Rsult B0

QOw'mmd x

Aug~ust 19BS August ;93.Im UI=~~1

0- a a 9-

ru In+ r' ":DO mAugust3,UM8 ALguut 3, I= August 3. I=

1 -0

U- a- a , 59 1540ai-15 -5

°Df• . r'

0 30 0 so so OD 40 a ID Q so O 0

Aug~ust IMl August 3,1903 August %I=6

6 -- 3-

"94 1

B4Ffoppendx o 03Ub0io

Fiur gB. uShet 3.10 ofut 5)0 ugs 316

B34Apedi6 ef 4tyAalssReut

IQzmpIadObserved x

August. 1, -M August V7,198 August. 1V,19M3-0 .0 0

-. -6 -4-. -0 -4

_mgr - Omg1

"Auust 1z. 19m August L7.19M August V. 19M

4 -1 -0240

-1 -U -4

D-l m I ' x -ib' g ' 4 l

-00 4

O $ 0 P in is 0 3 6 9 nI 15 a a 0 9 I2 aIDmm r* l•mm l" mO mg 1"

SAnut 17, 1MAgs MAgs 17, I

.4 -- 3

4-

-5-45 r1-is

00 0 w 0 01 00 040Ikaebr OC anpswumw NCmb -C

&uVOL 17. m93 August r7, I98 Augut r 198I

-4 4 -4

.- 1 - -3. j

-* iow , o joI I o -1 I Im


Apponcd8x Sety AnaBi P Rmus B35

Observed x

A I= *atioe 4I Sep 2ZI

24 s- a2.a 4! I

-m -m V-Dsm 7

2zan~ 1963 Seltombor M 196 S~ane 2Z963

0 3/DO. 4 g V DO2o VD.In.-

-5m~o -

Ob~served x

SqtAnber 2? 19M Seqimber 2P 1963 Sqtmbw 2Z 1M8

-3 -3 -13

2mvpum -C lupmbnpt 2=pswtum.-C

Sq~anbu V. 11=3 Sqtwnbtr M 1963

-5 -

-5m~ -m


636 Appendlx B Sensitivity Analysis Results

(Oberoed x

Jm. 2• l Ju~ne :•, 1983 Jima 2• 1983

* I 0 -tI .4 i ,J I I --G

1 :

-.. '-ui' ' t -18,a"4ilo 3i 0160 t13 15 036 e033]i

DznIDOzgI 4, Kx •,g1"

JAme •, 193 June 2P. 1983 ,une 22,1983

9o a 90

• 4 -40

a. 4 -. -21 50 a4 9 2 30-. 0

-- 13 -1

-6,4 - -.3

9-. I 2 ' --1 2 l -.1

- I Im -18qw~ C nesm-

0 ig so 3D 40 0 102 3040 a w m au

Tniazq=bn -C 2Mmpaatu OC pawiputue -C

Figure B8. Sensitivity analysis results from decreasing WCOD parameter50 percent for 1983 (Sheet 1 of 5)

B37A x dmV -w

July I= A* OD,1903 Ju~y 1X 96

-m-3 -03

-10 -uL -Im n2Dcomg 7' ag

Jo 2, I=6 Jxy M. 1983 A*v 20619133

04-3 _a

DO, mg 14 DO. mg Do, mg

Observed x

July 2(Xl6 I= * 0.19O3 A* D1983

0 -0 a -

-5-15 -35

JDA 80 40 03A1s08D40 0310 030 40

Ju* 206 I Ju*y2D. 1MA* Jg2D.1983

-5-4

-5-46-1 -Z0

01010304 0N1000 0334'hnperaw -C Tipecintwe. C Trnpastume IC


BU8 Appenclx 8 Sensitivity Anahysis Resutst

amplat .31O6 August 3, I=S August 3,9I=o a 0

-u e -aLU- -0

0O.nr DoRDr 4 wt 69nAr 91

Augustg0 Aagut3BSgust %A aw 63U

0 -a 4

-S-4 -4

-0 -. -100 w 0 a useu 0 a0 0a ww

I m1C 6c DO. fawm -C

August310 I=,10 AugutaB Wtut3,19I=

-5 g -4

-4 -1 -A

- I W

* w a 0 0 0os 0 wo ao

Figure B8. (Sheoo 3 of 5)

Appendx B Sons~itly Aralysis Plsut B39

Observe x

August 17,1983 August L7.18L3 August V7,0I=

-5 -- 0

2-.o 2-. . 2,-,•. . .

It 0 i0 a 0 8 A a 32 amumm m mssre m mg r0

"AWout 17. Amgust L7. 1M3 August 17. 198mo

04 - -8

,,4-0 -0

ro j 0 0 F g

4 3 022 ugus 17 2M Auus (7 3Agut1,

-m -, -4-5 -. -4

o m 4 0 0 0 a 0 asmuabzip~bzr, ' ~ ipbn~ C hPW*uvu, -C

August A 19 August U, 1 August 1Z. 19o-: I jj-1 -0 ,-4w

0 0A0 4 0 040'mpffabmr. -C 2inputWm -C ITinmdutum -C


Appendx B Sensitivity Analysis Result

Observe x

2,b I= 1S63 qeber 2P, 1903 September 12. I=

* I Ii 0 .• a J-4 - . -6

84 2.4 2_-.

)1

-O -is 1 -u O1I5 . 135 0"5603511 !0,36935

mgrV DO. mgr VKD.mg r

en 1= September 2Z 1963 2Z 12

Fgr8-. (See 5of5

B yB

-5 -s -s ! 3a9ni 03691

DO. mgr DO, mg V DO, mg t

Observed x

2Zm~e 1M6 September 2Z 1963 Septeber 2Z I=6

-5-3 -3

-5 elu -is -ismv%-

-~~b 2? 1963 Stepbsber M 1963

111

o3330a 010o1w3040


Appenix B Sensitivity Analyis RestlsB4

BLUESTONE 1981

CALIBRATION RESULTSS......... INCREASED WCOD 507.

S...Decreased WCOD 507.---..... INCREASED SOD 50Z

8 .. DECREASED SOD 507.

S 3 :

180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270JDAY

Figure 69. Comparison plot of sensitivity analysis results and calibrationresults

BLUESTONE 1983

CALIBRATION RESULTS.................... INCREASED WCOD 50%

Decreased WCOD 50%-------------------- INCREASED SOD 50%

>~5

0

S8*

03

CC 2

0

I I ' l I 1 I I

150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270

JDAY

Figure 810. Comparison plot of sensitivity analysis results and verificationresults

6342 Appenchx B Sensitivity Analysis Results

Appendix CScenario Results

Appendx C Scnaro Resuls C1

Soil -d Il'Observd x

A* M lo0*2. M2=a 0-

i 8 4 9 It0aa69a

5 -u-

-mB -u -

0 3 is

EM M Mg I' Mg r

4 • -e 4 • /l --0 I x¢l

-M -me ---m -u6 -.

DO, ug r D06 mgI' DO. mgl 4'

Ji 28, 19M A* 2a1981 J28,A lo61

0- 0 10 s 0a0

DO -6j 1--4eei C ~ xh,.-

Figure C1. Scenario 1 results from increasing pool 11 It for 1981 and 1983

(Sheet I of 10)

C2 Appendlix C Scenario Resufts

Observd x

* 2IA -2

4 -.1 1 4

-.- -3

-5I i- I * . - lli.i

0 0 20 0 4D 0 i so I0 40 a to so aon".•., *a sumcI~pM~~C 2~apmatul -C mmoasur. -C

A* 2£ 0O A*2.1MA* 5

1 4 -41,.4 -O ,=O-

- I - A,=s -. -.5

o 10 340 050O 4 0 03w30hIT'bu 6C hquTwe C opmutum TC

Cwnp -

Jy 1 Ju28, 1. August2 25, I=o 0 0

4, -3 -3

2- -e 2-8.-- -j01a03100 a mum 0 aa0ea69It 1Figpare lC (Shaeu 2ofC DO. mg V

hipust 25. 16 August 2561961 August 25,1983o

0

4 3 -2 503 9 503 21mg- D. mgr Km

Figure Cl. (Sheet 2 of 10)

Appendx C Scenario ResuIts C3

O x

Augut 25 M Agust25, Auust 25. IMl

4 -6 fX X%

i"4

Sm.,., OSSINl- 036 l133

a mg4 DOn9r a Da99 s a49

hmigmt WA nl August2 m981 Aupustmu1

00

4 "" -0'r

04. 2 2,-. ,1

-n-

F0 3:I ($4 9 af a 6f0) 91

AgppeD& Mndix I'cn• ~m

Observed x

Augut 2516 1M August 2548I= August 2k 1Mh* - f -0.

4-3

f a24 -a-5 -9 -9

2-S -43 -3

Augus 25.19M August 256S M August 2k SM8

* o0w4 0 0 a

Fiur Cl6 -Set10f 0

C4 Appendix C Scenario Results

Auut24 1981 August 25. M AugumL25.1Ml8

0

64 60

.4 -as -6

-- 4 If

!ON 1l I 4CD. gV O m 7

-m~ue -w

Obin-wed-x

SAm 23, 1281 soota 23, 1981 SWAm~be 23 1981

* itr a2a1 21 0 it 0

as -3 1

Mmg2l' DMmngr V Mmg14

Fiur C. (See 44f 0

Appenclx C Scenaro Raubw C5

Qinwred x

Sijm~2% I=8 Sq*nnbw 2% MM8 satb 2% IM

* S 0-. 4

-5 -1

01 w 40 03W6MM33 0 M020W040

2% I=0 sotnb 2% SM 9 Septwabw 2% 19M

w5 -a -5 0a00

'hmpagb% -C 2up~mture -C 2IPMAUM-C

Sqtmjsbe 2M M98 Sq*mb M ISM1 Steymbw M 1981

* 0 0

-.- 5 -8-s -4 9 -4

0 0 mma0 AMW-8 pmm 4C 1mawm 4mmbm,

Fiur C. (Shoot 5 of 10

C 6 pp w x C So nad Reu3

Obmave x

June 22 1I6 June 2p 196 June 2P 1L6

00 0

94 gr Mmg-.mc

- um -uAMS

Ivo a 0

0 3 .4 -5 36 ni

Jime 2P 1963 Jine 2P 1963 June 2P IM6

0 x0a0 0 A0

4c ola~ 4 4EM -1I'Fiur 6-.(het64f 0

Appnd CSomi Pul C

Obseved x

* I0 0

4 A A. 1a 4mm4 f3 o6 mg V24 m

*0 0

4 -s -0 a09

DO. mg I' D(Xmg V D06mg I'

ompfted-Obeved x

A* y20619133 A* 20. L93 A* D.198

* ~00

7ampetbn% 'C 2mpxture, C hmplareb, OC

Figue C . Shet 7of 10

* 081peci C Scnro eut

Qzmaved x

An I=August :319I= August318 Agt3.1983

.4 -3-3

.4 - I

9 It 15 0 a613 @1 1mOmgr' mo1r Ing mgr'

August 3M8 AuuM 3,18 August a.98

o sa 0 0 si

4 -fl f 4

-6- 6-

.4 .4 -6

sc wsnw -C

August M,98 A= &wit z 19M3 August & 1983

141w 0 a0

Figure Ci. (Sheet 8of 10)

Appendx C Scenario Results C

Obomwd x

Anugfut A17,96 August 1V,1L8 August V7.1IM

II I? - I

-5 -u -m aDO, mgr ixr M xx g V

August 1 7. 1983 August. 17.198 August V7,1983

-10

DO, ing D0 mIg V DO. mg V

Observed x

August 17, 198 August rZ 1983 August V7,9IM

* 0 -0-4!

0 0 a 0

August 17 =Ags MAgs .I

-a-5 -- a

'hnpereti. -C T¶Ihmprsur- C TWNpUUteM -C

Figure Cl. (Sheet 9 of 10)

clo Appendx C Scenrmio Resufts

Obsierve

296 IM 1963er2p Sel 2z 196

-m~- -m--0 -0 I

a 9 t 0 a 0 3a9A

944

-5 9 -M -sg m

Computed -Observed x

September 2% 163 Septamber 2A 196 Septea1be 2- I960 1

0 -0 14 1-4 -

0 to0m 40 01A0 so 40 01010 So 0

¶hmperstmr -C Unpmkuhu -C 1hmpsetraw SC

Scoember M 1M6 SCRme 1963

- -6

9-. 1

-L -m

0 100 =40 033 M3040

lTaiperstm" -C lpmbue, C

Figure Cl.- (Sheet 10 of 10)

Appendix C Scenario ResuRBCi

ObowwA x

is* 2% M Ju* 2M S Ju* 2 M,0

4 .-4;

• -- -- -_

- a .aa4 6

O 2 Igm | 4 i% = a* M MM

D~O. mV DO, mg V" Mg I' 1

' o 0'il--3 /-.4 5

-O. 0,4

-0

-4 a 6 9 a -i8 0 3 .-a 9 a sa3a22

MO ms !1DOnaI- DO, mg r1•g* -. 2 2M h5 2 1

036935

power ~ ~ ~ ~~Qere fox91ad18 SetIo 0

C1 4 -4 S o

•-5 -. 5 -3

036 935 -161350113

DO, mgf1" DO, zan ir DO, gra l

-0.4 ..49

-5-41 -3S

Figure C2. Scenario 2 results from increasing pool li ft and adding hydro-

power for 1981 and 1983 (Sheet 1 of 10)

C12 Appedix C Sosnano Results

i* j% 19 0* 2kIM

94 £3

( 94 4

0, ,,0 0 D0a04aaI

-4 -. =4

-U -I

- A 3D 380 0 A 30 0 00 a so 106bpm w ' C -,%irl C k O, 'CA* 24 198 4* 2fAgut2.I

0 0/ .0-s -3 -3

-1m -, -1.

t'hu.wa -C - U1P8 U 'C M , -1

Augusht 2Augtl61 Augus 125Mo 0

4 -a

-M

o 304 Is0 03330aRi 0 3 6 9 ihmpe~DO. mg kpnre, CDO, mg 1

Aiur gu. Shet 2 of 10) uut2~161Ags ,18

ApniCScnro Ries C13

Cmaped

-. -8 -3

Maw..r r M ' Dr'

6 0fn Auutms Ags6%a

n4 9F ,-4

- -s -5-

-m-4 -am

* 10 a

a5 -m -4

0 33 so0 Is1 9A INI d 0 491

vnpm~nv. -C 2averwnumSC T~~u -C

Fiur C.(he3of 10)

C14 Appendx C Scenario RlmuIb

1 .4 1-O,nqrt m, A8 • 25•-IZ6-4•• 2. Iasi

.4 3

-s - -6

0 I sh0a 0 1 1050 A

hzgeue 3 1951 Seu2enbw 2, 1981 Sq w 23. 1Mf

0 S 0

DO mgVm 4D, -•g 1'

4 -4~ 4

-44 1 1-0

-5-n -12

0 33300 SU*I 03 021 0 30 0 i'DO.~n mg C DO. mg I'D06 mg -

Figure C2. (Sheet 4 of 10)

Apwx C Scenario euft C 15

Obourved x

bitmbw 2% 198 s~w- A 1M8 Septmmbm 2 1981

* ~004mg 2=p n -C

.4 94 94

-s -n

*sesmdum oasxvbm - mam -Cuo~

Sq*mmbw 2% 190 5qem*~bu 2% 19M1 Sq*em 2% 19M

w a 0 0 e4 s o4

9 .6 -43 4

033 40 IDm030 40 01N0303040'knmwmnzl -C ¶knpxwmr -C 1Tnpmutuz -C

Figur C2.(Shet 5 f 10

C16unb 23,1981 Cab 23,198 Sqibe 2 98

0bwved x

Jum. 2P 1IM June 2P I=8 Jun. IM96o 0 0

-- 3

a oa 9a1 a1 -3 a9V

am. W, 196 A=n Z 1963 June 2Z 196

m- mg I DO.mgl

Observed x

Jun. 2% 106 June 2Z 1IM Jime 2Z I=

*1 J90 304 0 10M 01 0 N 34 3zmr - 0 4mm96Ae aprimO

Appendix C Scenario~ Cmu C17at~

Observed x

Juy2.9 o D,16 M A* 20. s

* 1 0

93 a 5030 50

-g DO. -5 Vmmg

-u -u -isosesmbseve x103063

a 0 a 0

A5 -m -s A w0

Figure C2.ni (Shet09of10

cis~r Appenr' C Sorio es'

Compnd-Observd x

Auigust8,19M Augtt 31fI3 August 3,198

-31 -6 1/ -03

64 fl a A r a I

IrJ~ugr mnr' Dmmgr'

Angast.3. W August316 Auut 3.19ow0. 0

-4 -E -

-40 -0 -0

DOmgr DO. mgF V Inmg V

Oberved x

Augt,1M&Wt,3, fl8 August 3. 1M

4 a -5

64 P -4 -3 I-a 1K2 if

-3 q -m -3mI =mhm CT~lbm

App.wUR CC Sapmbuu, C~uf bnp19,

C(mivd z

August Vi. IM6 August V7,18M August V7.198

0 iEx

-m-3 -3

-B-0 -0

IA mg1 rO iug14 Dwgr'

I=gat Aquo A kzmt1,1 August V7. 196o ~00

4-n 43

-3-M -ta016 4933 0536 0n335 0 36,33A

m mzgr DOmf'mg1'

Observd x

Augus 17, 1M6 August 17,19I3 August 17, 1M6

.4 -5 -3

bxap~IurC kxpmktulmC 2mpustmr~c

Augus t 17.63 August 17. 1963 August Vi, 1I=

2-a -

.4-

-5 -46 -J0315 0325100 @33154a

'hup~u~ C 1qpeuvwm -C bnpmub^re -C


C20 Appeidx C Scenaio Resubt

Observd x

*9 16 03

-4 -m -5

=Omar MOmgt'

September V. M98 Sq b I= 1983mbe M UM8

* 3 0 0 0 i

-M 43 -

Omtmiod

24mb I=98 September M 198 sqat bz I=98* 0 j 0

O0ow 0 , 0 x Ma 0as0 D W40TwbiipnM~ -C bnaubnetUV6C Upeshbm -C

Sqtunbs 2Z 19W Septen~b M 1983

-'-a

14 1 14

* Ew S M 035330 40Ihzium; o ' 1C 1hi oae c

Figure C2. (Sheet 100of10)

Appenix C Sosnail Resuks C21

BLUESTONE 1981

-Calibration......... Increased Pool Only

Increased Pool and Hydro

2EO "it

€= 4

o 3

i 241

0 3

180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270

JDAY

BLUESTONE 1981

- Calibration29.......... Increased Pool Only29 Increased Pool and Hydro

28

27

S26

S25S24 "

23

22I-

21

20

19

180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270

JDAY

Figure C3. Comparison plots of DO and temperature calibration, Scenario 1,and Scenario 2 results (1981)

C22 Appendx C Soenario Resuts

BLUESTONE 1981

6REFERENCE LINE

5 INCREASED POOL ONLYINCREASED POOL AND HYDRO

4

c- 3

2 2

• 3 | I . I ,I i . I p I , I

180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270JDAY

BLUESTONE 1981

SREFERENCE LINE1.2 ..... INCREASED POOL ONLY

1.0 ... INCREASED POOL AND HYDROm 0.8

S 0.4

S-0.2

-1.2

180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270

JDAY

Figure 04. DO and temperature differences between calibration results andboth scenario results

•x c •m C23

BLUESTONE 1983

8 Verification......... Increased Pool Only

Increased Pool and Hydro

7

>-5

2

150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270

JDAY

BLUESTONE 1983

- Verification.......... Increased Pool Only

Increased Pool and Hydro29

28

27L)

S26

25

24

C-2 3

f-22

21

20

150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270

JDAY

Figure C5. Comparison plots of DO and temperature verification, Scenario 1,and Scenario 2 results (1983)

C24 Appencix C Scenario Resubt

BLUESTONE 1983

3 REFERENCE LINE......... INCREASED POOL ONLY

INCREASED POOL AND HYDRO2

z£

-2150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270

JDAY

BLUESTONE 1983

REFERENCE LINE......... INCREASED POOL ONLY

1.2 7 INCREASED POOL AND HYDRO

1.0C 0.8

zr. 0.6

0.4r 0.2

• -0.4

:• -0.6

- -0.8-1.0

150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270

JDAY

Figure C6. DO and temperature differences between verification results andboth scenario results

Aox C Savab P.uft C25

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE ow ft. 070o86

P .Ak mooi burdmn ft, the odattaonf .4intmatw" a atiad to ave•age I how be nmpoen. nddi.ng to, for.eeewg ,mzuajo " e xcisting date wurg•n.nand u40"W"mn t data ngedo. and comelt" and raiwvan the. (colectson of st tormaton. Send cownntsw rogiling Otis burden estimate Or any oter •• O this

cofea w4interoaboa mchiding suosb - fmq reducing this burden. to Washiington meaduaflarts Services. Directoraefet fo norinaton Operastmions and RfeporM. 121SamoOs..s NhI~wa. lWise UU0. Arlington.A 2220-4302. &An t0o"ft Offie of Managemeant and &49g1M. 0`uowwork Reduction Propec (07040106), Wasigngton. DC 2M13-

1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Le@re bi&0) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED

I February 1994 I Final report____________4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE S. FUNDING NUMBERS

Bluesto Phase 2 Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Modeling Study

IL AUTHONS)

Dorothy H. TilimanThomas M. Cole

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER

U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Miscellaneous PaperEnvironmental Laboratory EL-94-23909 Hails Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADORESSES) 10. SPONSORING /MONITORINGAGENCY REPORT NUMBER

U.S. Army Engineer District, Huntington502 8th StreetHuntington, WV 25701-207

11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

Available from National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.

12a. OISTRIBUTIONIAVALABiLITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

13. ABSTRACT (Mafxmum 200 wont)

The U.S. Army Engineer District, Huntington, is considering raising the pool I I ft at Bluestone Lake and addingcooventional hydropower to the project The Huntington District requested assistance from the U.S. Army EngineerWaterways Experiment Station to determine the effects these changes would have on in-pool and release temperatureand dissolved oxygen (DO) of Bluestone Lake. CE-QUAL-W2, the Corps two-dimensional (laterally averaged)reservoir hydrodynamic and water quality model, was chosen to evaluate the effects. Because other water qualityconstituents were not modeled, DO was modeled in a simplified manner using a gross water column oxygen demandand a sediment oxygen demand. The model was calibrated and verified for a wet and dry hydrology. Aftercalibration/verification, two scenarios were run looking at (a) raising the pool I ft only and (b) raising the pool andadding hydropower. Results indicate that Scenario I would cause changes in in-pool and release temperature and DO.Adding hydropower (Scenario 2) did not significantly affect in-pool and release temperature and DO results whencompared with Scenario I results.

14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGESDissolved oxygen Sediment oxygen demand Water quality 117Hydropower Temperature 16. PRICE CODEModeling Water column oxygen demand

17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION IS. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACTOF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACTUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev 2-89)Proscribed by ANSi Std. Z39-1S

2M-102

Destroy tids report when no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator.

& •b

Bluestone Phase 2 Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen ... · Miscellaneous Paper EL-94-2 February 1994...

Documents

Transcript of Bluestone Phase 2 Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen ... · Miscellaneous Paper EL-94-2 February 1994...