Bloomberg)L.P. IFRS)9)Classification)and)Measurement

21
Bloomberg L.P. IFRS 9 Classification and Measurement Scott Coulter, CPA, CA, CFA Enterprise Accounting Products 1 Mar 2017

Transcript of Bloomberg)L.P. IFRS)9)Classification)and)Measurement

Bloomberg  L.P.IFRS  9  Classification  and  Measurement

Scott  Coulter,  CPA,  CA,  CFAEnterprise  Accounting  Products1  Mar  2017

Agenda

§ Overview  of  IFRS  9  Classification  &  Measurement§ Implementation  Challenges

§ Data§ Technical  Expertise§ Audit  Trail  &  Documentation

§ Bloomberg  Solution  Overview§ Case  Study:  Large  European  Bank  &  Insurer§ The  Road  to  Implementation§ Q&A

BLOOMBERG  REGULATORY  SOLUTIONSRAAP<GO>

3

Capital  &  LiquidityTrading  &  Monitoring

Automated  machine  readable  data  feed

Accounting

Bloomberg’s  Enterprise  Regulatory  Data  solutions  support  firms’  regulatory  compliance  efforts  while  unlocking  significant  operational,  capital  and  balance  sheet  efficiencies

Tax

Bloomberg  Solutions

RiskFront  office Treasury Finance

Functions

Daily  re-­‐assessment  &  quality  controls

Compliance Audit

Bloomberg  Accounting  SolutionsBloomberg  Accounting  

Solutions

Fair  Value  Hierarchy  Levelling IFRS  9  SPPI IFRS  9  ECL

• Assists clients in performing the contractual cash flows test required by IFRS 9’s updated classification and measurement model by automating the process of manually reviewing individual security prospectuses and legal documents

• Allows clients to create and store their own fair value leveling rules to generate unique, client-specific leveling results.

• These rules leverage over 70 data fields which provides a summary of the underlying, observable market data used to generate the Bloomberg’s price for a security

• Leverages our existing market-leading default risk models and incorporates new IFRS 9 requirements to deliver the an implementation-ready credit risk product specifically targeted for IFRS 9 purposes

Overview  IFRS  9  Financial  Instruments

5

§ On  July  24,  2014  the  IASB  issued  IFRS  9,  Financial  Instruments1,  replacing  IAS  39  ‘Financial  Instruments

§ IFRS  9  is  effective  for  annual  periods  beginning  on  or  after  1  January  2018  with  early  adoption  permitted

§ Regulatory  bodies  started  conducting  Quantitative  Impact  Studies  (QIS)  by  mid-­‐2016  to  understand  impact  in  more  detail

A  Single  and  Integrated  Standard

1.  http://www.ifrs.org/current-­‐projects/iasb-­‐projects/financial-­‐instruments-­‐a-­‐replacement-­‐of-­‐ias-­‐39-­‐financial-­‐instruments-­‐recognitio/documents/ifrs-­‐9-­‐project-­‐summary-­‐july-­‐2014.pdf

Classification  and  Measurement Impairment Hedge  Accounting

6

What  are  the  largest  challenges  facing  financial  institutions  implementing  IFRS  9?• EBA  survey  found  that  data  quality  and  availability are  the  two  biggest  challenges• Surveys  performed  by  the  Big  Four  have  found  a  variety  of  complications  and  challenges  

including  interpretations,  resourcing  requirements,  and  data

Based  on  our  conversations  with  clients,  most  challenges  fall  into  a  few  categories:

Implementation  Challenges

Security  Data

SPPI  Test  

Results,  Documentation,  &  

Audit  TrailSecurity  DocsSecurity  DocsIFRS  Guidance&  Interpretation

1

23

1

2

3

Data

Technical  Expertise

Documentation  &  Audit  Trail

Model  Build/Validation

C&M  &  ECLECL

4

7

• By  Bloomberg’s  count,  more  than  100  different  individual  security  features  need  to  be  extracted  from  prospectuses  and  analyzed  in  order  to  comprehensively  apply  the  SPPI  test

• In  many  cases,  financial  institutions  do  not  have  the  required  security  level  data  available  or  the  manpower  to  mine  this  data  themselves

• The  data  extraction  process  is  arduous  and  time  consuming;  it  reaches  teams  of  people  reviewing  securities  one-­‐by-­‐one

• However,  without  the  underlying  data,  it  is  challenging  if  not  impossible  for  these  clients  to  accurately  or  efficiently  reach  conclusions  or  defend  those  conclusions  to  auditors/regulators

• Many  firms  have  tried  to  short-­‐cut  the  SPPI  analysis  using  sample  testing  because  of  the  huge  data  burden,  but  based  on  our  interpretation  and  many  of  the  Big  4,  this  is  not  allowed

Implementation  Challenge  #1:  Data

Security  DocsSecurity  DocsSecurity  Docs

Data  Warehouse

Key  Challenge  Area:  Contractually-­‐Linked  Instruments• Guidance  requires  looking  through  the  securitization  structure  in  assessing  the  SPPI  test• Entities  must  have  data  not  only  on  the  instruments  but  on  the  underlying  pools  as  well

Data  Challenge  Example  -­‐ Hybrid  Bonds

8

• XS0304987042  is  a  hybrid  bond  issued  by  insurance  company  Munich  Re.    The  bond  initially  has  a  fixed  coupon,  but  subsequent  to  Jun  2017,  the  coupon  switches  to  a  variable  coupon  calculated  as  3  month  EURIBOR  +  204  bps

Data  Challenge  Example  -­‐ Hybrid  Bonds

9

• XS0304987042  is  a  hybrid  bond  issued  by  insurance  company  Munich  Re.    The  bond  initially  has  a  fixed  coupon,  but  subsequent  to  Jun  2017,  the  coupon  switches  to  a  variable  coupon  calculated  as  3  month  EURIBOR  +  204  bps

• As  is  the  case  with  many  hybrid  bonds,  the  Munich  Re  bond  allows  for  the  issuer  to  exercise  an  optional  deferral  of  interest  payments

Deferrable  interest  payment,  cumulative

Data  Challenge  Example  -­‐ Hybrid  Bonds

10

No  interest  on  deferral

• XS0304987042  is  a  hybrid  bond  issued  by  insurance  company  Munich  Re.    The  bond  initially  has  a  fixed  coupon,  but  subsequent  to  Jun  2017,  the  coupon  switches  to  a  variable  coupon  calculated  as  3  month  EURIBOR  +  204  bps

• As  is  the  case  with  many  hybrid  bonds,  the  Munich  Re  bond  allows  for  the  issuer  to  exercise  an  optional  deferral  of  interest  payments

• Section  4(a)  of  the  Munich  Re  prospectus  states  that  if  the  optional  interest  deferral  is  exercised,  the  interest  which  is  deferred  does  not  accrue  interest

Data  Challenge  Example  -­‐ Hybrid  Bonds

11

No  interest  on  deferral

• XS0304987042  is  a  hybrid  bond  issued  by  insurance  company  Munich  Re.    The  bond  initially  has  a  fixed  coupon,  but  subsequent  to  Jun  2017,  the  coupon  switches  to  a  variable  coupon  calculated  as  3  month  EURIBOR  +  204  bps

• As  is  the  case  with  many  hybrid  bonds,  the  Munich  Re  bond  allows  for  the  issuer  to  exercise  an  optional  deferral  of  interest  payments

• Section  4(a)  of  the  Munich  Re  prospectus  states  that  if  the  optional  interest  deferral  is  exercised,  the  interest  which  is  deferred  does  not  accrue  interest

Fail

• Once  the  necessary  data  has  been  obtained,  flowing  this  data  through  the  SPPI  test  requires  significant  understanding  of  complex  technical  accounting  concepts  at  a  broad  enterprise  level.  In  many  cases,  this  in-­‐depth  technical  knowledge  is  scarce  internally.

• Need  to  follow  and  keep  up  to  date  on  guidance  and  interpretations  from:– IASB– Large,  global  accounting  firms– Peer  firms  (market  consensus)– Industry  groups

Implementation  Challenge  #2:  Technical  Expertise

12

• Proper  implementation  of  IFRS  9  requires  personnel  to:1. Understand  the  guidelines  and  

interpretations  of  IFRS  92. Stay  current  on  changes  caused  by  new  

standards,  interpretations  or  industry  consensus

3. Apply  this  guidance  accurately  and  consistently  throughout  implementation  and  going  forward

SPPI  Methodology/  Rules  Engine

Defensible  SPPI  Results

IASB

Industry  Players Industry  Groups

Accounting  Firms

13

• The  conclusions  reached  on  the  SPPI  test  and  contractual  cash  flows  test  affect  the  classification  and  measurement  of  financial  institutions’  investment  portfolios  in  their  audited  financial  statements.    

• Therefore,  the  SPPI  test  conclusions  fall  within  the  scope  of  the  financial  institution’s  external  audit.    

• It  is  imperative  financial  statement  issuers  are  able  to  defend  the  logic  and  interpretations  that  they  have  applied  in  performing  their  SPPI  test  as  well  as  the  output  and  results  of  the  test.    

• It’s  is  important  that  any  IFRS  9  Classification  &  Measurement  Plan  considers  the  following  questions:– How  will  you  document  and  audit  your  C&M  results?– How  will  you  present  and  defend  your  C&M  results  to  your  auditors?– How  will  you  adjust  your  results  with  changes  in  guidance  or  interpretations?

Implementation  Challenge  #3:  Audit  Trail  &  Documentation

“If  it’s  not  documented,  it  wasn’t  done!”

How  is  Bloomberg  Helping  Clients  with  IFRS  9  C&M?

§ Considers  on  daily    basis  more  than  100  security  field  characteristics  for  any  features  potentially  creating  cash  flows  inconsistent  with  the  “solely  payments  of  principal  and  interest”  criterion

§ Provides  comprehensive,  global  coverage  of  security  attributes that  would  be  time-­‐consuming  and  costly  for  users  to  review  manually  on  a  security-­‐by-­‐security  basis.    Product  covers  approximately  2  million  securities  (350k  fixed  income,  1.6  million  securitized/pools)

§ Bloomberg  Global  Data  reviews  each  security’s  prospectus  in  detail  in  order  to  evaluate  70  security  attributes  one-­‐by  one:§ Security  descriptive  data§ Coupon  characteristics§ Optionalities§ Covenants§ Structured  features§ Benchmark  and  reference  rate  characteristics

14

Bloomberg’s  IFRS  9  SPPI  Solution  is  an  operational  solution  which  combines  Bloomberg’s  extensive  security  data  with  an  in-­‐depth  methodology.

Case  Study:  Large  Global  Bank  &  Insurer

Background• Global  bank  and  insurer  with  significant  investment  portfolios  on  both  their  sell  side  (bank)  and  buy  side  (insurer)• Employed  Big  4  consultants  to  help  review  and  determine  gaps• Needed  a  centralized  process  to  ensure  consistent  results  across  buy/sell  sides  and  geographies

15

DATA TECHNICAL  INTERPRETATIONS

DOCUMENTATION &  AUDIT  TRAIL

Challenges

• Insufficient  security  attributeinformation

• Holes  in  coverage  across  instruments  and  geography

• Inconsistent  methodology  and  application  across  buy/sell  side and  geographies

• Insufficient  staff/resources  to  centralize  process

• Need  documentation  to  ensure  consistent  application and  to  defend  results  to  auditors  and  regulators

• Need  to  be  able  to  adjust  results  with  changing  guidance/interpretations

Perform  initial  assessment/gap  

analysisObtain  security  data

Develop  policies/assessment  

methodology

Perform  security-­‐by-­‐security  assessment Document  results

Implementation  Timeline

ü

Implementation  Challenges

Case  Study:  Large  Global  Bank  &  Insurer

Solution• After  assessing  their  needs  and  options,  the  client  selected  Bloomberg’s  IFRS  9  SPPI  solution• Considers  on  daily    basis  more  than  100  security  field  characteristics  for  any  features  potentially  creating  cash  

flows  inconsistent  with  the  “solely  payments  of  principal  and  interest”  criterion• Provides  global  coverage  of  approx.  2  million  securities  (350k  fixed  income,  1.6  million  securitized/pools)

16

DATA TECHNICAL  INTERPRETATIONS

DOCUMENTATION &  AUDIT  TRAIL

Benefits

• Product  leverages  Bloomberg’s  extensivesecurity  data  warehouse  to  product  automated  results

• Product  considers  over  100  security  attributes in  reaching  an  SPPI  conclusion

• Worked  with  key industry  players  and  auditors  in  developing  the  product  methodology

• Test  rules  were  built  basedon  the  aggregate  consensus  of  the  market  and  the  accounting  firms

• Product  provides  security  data  to  justify  conclusions  reached

• All  interpretations  are  included  in  a  35  page  methodology  document  available  to  clients/auditors

Perform  initial  assessment/gap  

analysisObtain  security  data

Develop  policies/assessment  

methodology

Perform  security-­‐by-­‐security  assessment Document  results

Implementation  Timeline

ü

Benefits  of  Solution

ü ü ü ü

Bloomberg’s    IFRS  9  SPPI  Solution

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

IFRS  9  Issued Today Implementation

17

The  Road  to  Implementation:    Jan  1,  2018  Looms

Benefits  of  automated  solution  include:• Reduced  data  requirements• Reduced  resources  requirements• Ensure  consistent  results  across  geography/product

• Ensures  guidance  is  applied  uniformly  • Allows  for  flexibility  to  changes  in  guidance  or  interpretation• Automatically  generates  an  audit  trail  of  the  reason  for  pass  

or  fail  result

1 2 3

• How  will  you  maintain  the  IFRS  9  C&M  process  after  the  adoption  date?

• What  sort  of  resources  and  team  will  this  project  have  going  forward?

• Have  you  designed  or  implemented  an  operational  solution?

Where  is  your  organization  with  

implementation  of  C&M?

What  still  needs  to  be  done  by  Jan  1,  2018?  

What  about  after  Jan  1,  2018?

• Are  there  still  data  gaps  that  need  to  be  solved?

• Are  you  prepared  for  possible  changes  in  guidance/interpretation  between  now  and  2018?

• How  will  you  maintain  the  IFRS  9  C&M  process  after  the  adoption  date?

• What  sort  of  resources  and  team  will  this  project  have  going  forward?

• Have  you  designed  or  implemented  an  operational  solution?

1 2 3

IFRS  9  Implementation  Timeline

18

The  Road  to  Implementation:    Jan  1,  2018  Looms

The  Case  for  Automation

Given  that  internal  resources  are  scarce  and  the  scope  of  IFRS  9  is  wide,  any  efficiencies  that  can  be  gained  in  the  initial  assessment  are  valuable.

Benefits  of  automation  include:• Reduced  data  requirements• Reduced  resources  requirements• Ensures  guidance  is  applied  uniformly  (no  variance  in  interpretations)• Ensure  consistent  results  across  geography  and  product  type• Allows  for  flexibility  to  changes  in  guidance,  interpretation,  or  market  practice• Automatically  generates  an  audit  trail  of  the  reason  for  pass  or  fail  result

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

IFRS  9  Issued Today Implementation1 2 3IFRS  9  Implementation  Timeline

Q&A

Contact  &  Accounting  Solutions

Bloomberg  Accounting  Solutions

Agnieszka SoltysikE:  [email protected]:  +44  20  35253217

Fair  Value  Hierarchy  Levelling IFRS  9  SPPI IFRS  9  ECL

Please  stop  by  our  booth  or  reach  out  to  any  of  our  team  members  in  order  to  discuss  our  portfolio  of  accounting  products

Bloomberg  Accounting  Solutions

Scott  Coulter,  CFA,  CPA,  CAE:  [email protected]:  +1  646  324  2880

Bloomberg  Accounting  Solutions

Murat  BozdemirE:  [email protected]:  +44  20  35258449

Accounting  Product  Team

DISCLAIMERThe  BLOOMBERG  PROFESSIONAL  service,  BVAL  and  BRAM  (the  "Services")  are  owned  and  distributed  by  Bloomberg  Finance  L.P.  ("BFLP")  in  all  jurisdictions  other  than  Argentina,  Bermuda,  China,  India,  Japan  and  Korea  (the  "BLP  Countries").  BFLP  is  a  wholly  owned  subsidiary  of  Bloomberg  L.P.  ("BLP").  BLP  provides  BFLP  with  global  marketing  and  operational  support  and  service  for  the  Services  and  distributes  the  Services  either  directly  or  through  a  non-­‐BFLP  subsidiary  in  the  BLP  Countries.  Certain  functionalities  distributed  via  the  Services  are  available  only  to  sophisticated  institutional  investors  and  only  where  the  necessary  legal  clearance  has  been  obtained.    BFLP,  BLP  and  their  affiliates  do  not  guarantee  the  accuracy  of    information  in  the  Services.    Nothing  in  the  Services  shall  constitute  or  be  construed  as  (a)  a  recommendation  of  fair  value  hierarchy  classification  rules  or  (b)  investment  advice  or  recommendations  (i.e.,  recommendations  as  to  whether  or  not  to  "buy",  "sell",  "hold",  or  to  enter  or  not  to  enter  into  any  other  transaction  involving  any  specific  interest  or  interests)  by  BLP,  BFLP  or  their  affiliates  under  any  circumstance.  You  and  your  firm  should  review  the  applicable  rules  and  consult  with  your  advisors  to  determine  your  firm's  classification  policies.    BLOOMBERG,  BLOOMBERG  PROFESSIONAL,  BLOOMBERG  MARKETS,  BLOOMBERG  NEWS,  BLOOMBERG  ANYWHERE,  BLOOMBERG  TRADEBOOK,  BLOOMBERG  TELEVISION,  BLOOMBERG  RADIO,  BLOOMBERG  PRESS  and  BLOOMBERG.COM  are  trademarks  and  service  marks  of  BFLP,  a  Delaware  limited  partnership,  or  its  subsidiaries.

©  2017  Bloomberg  Finance  L.P.  All  rights  reserved.  This  document  and  its  contents  may  not  be  forwarded  or  redistributed  without  the  prior  consent  of  Bloomberg.