Blended Offerings

14
Blended Offerings A plan for Vatterott College, Memphis-Dividend Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

description

Blended Offerings. A plan for Vatterott College, Memphis-Dividend. Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University. Blended general education courses: A feasible solution to challenges. Blended general education courses: Memphis-Dividend programs. Our students. Limited digital skills - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Blended Offerings

Page 1: Blended Offerings

Blended Offerings

A plan for Vatterott College, Memphis-Dividend

Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

Page 2: Blended Offerings

Blended general education courses:A feasible solution to challenges

Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

Page 3: Blended Offerings

Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

Blended general education courses:Memphis-Dividend programs

Page 4: Blended Offerings

Our students

Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

• Limited digital skills

• Limited access to computers

• Limited access to internet

• Limited motivation to change

Page 5: Blended Offerings

Blended learning:The research

• Higher student satisfaction with blended courses

• Equivalent or better learning outcomes

• Higher student engagement

• Institutional prestige

• Reasonable costs

Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

Page 6: Blended Offerings

Blended learning:Needs

• Scheduling

• Classroom access

• Faculty

• Laptops

• Wireless access

• Technical support

Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

Page 7: Blended Offerings

Blended learning: NeedsSchedule, faculty, classrooms • Three meetings a

term

• Use of existing available classrooms

• New instructors

Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

Page 8: Blended Offerings

Blended learning: NeedsAccess to computers and the internet • Laptops for all

students in blended classes

• Wireless access at the college

Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

Page 9: Blended Offerings

Blended learning: NeedsTechnical support

• 7 a.m. – 11 p.m. shared telephone technical support

Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

Page 10: Blended Offerings

Blendedcourses:A practical solutionto needs at Memphis-DividendLana Sumpter, Northcentral University

Page 11: Blended Offerings

Questions??Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

Page 12: Blended Offerings

ReferencesAshby, J., Sadera, W. A., & McNary, S. W. (2011). Comparing student success

between developmental math courses offered online, blended, and face-to-face. Journal Of Interactive Online Learning, 10(3), 128-140.

Dray, B. J., Lowenthal, P. R., Miszkiewicz, M. J., Ruiz-Primo, M., & Marczynski, K. (2011). Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: a validation study. Distance Education, 32(1), 29-47. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.565496

Greenhow, C., Walker, J. D., & Seongdok, K. (2009). Millennial Learners and Net-Savvy Teens? Examining Internet Use among Low-Income Students. Journal Of Computing In Teacher Education, 26(2), 63-68.

Hsieh, J.J.P.-A., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008). Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 97–126. Retrieved from http://www.misq.org/

Kerr, M. S., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. C. (2006). Student characteristics for online learning success. Internet & Higher Education, 9(2), 91-105. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.03.002Lana Sumpter, Northcentral

University

Page 13: Blended Offerings

References (continued)

Luehmann, A. (2009). Accessing resources for identity development by urban students and teachers: foregrounding context. Cultural Studies Of Science Education, 4(1), 51-66. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9139-4

Melton, B., Graf, H., & Chopak-Foss, J. (2009). Achievement and Satisfaction in Blended Learning versus Traditional General Health Course Designs. International Journal For The Scholarship Of Teaching & Learning, 3(1), 1-13.

O’Brien, D., & Scharber, C. (2008). Digital literacies go to school: Potholes and possibilities. Journal Of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 66-68.

Owen, J., & Kuan, K. (2010). Paving the Way for True Education Reform in Memphis. Tennessee Center for Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.tennesseepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/Paving-the-Way-for-True-Education-Reform-in-Memphis.pdf

Percival, J., & Percival, N. (2009). A case of a laptop learning campus: how do technology choices affect perceptions?. ALT-J: Research In Learning Technology, 17(3), 173-186. doi:10.1080/09687760903247633

Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University

Page 14: Blended Offerings

References (continued)

Selwyn, N. (2011). Digitally distanced learning: A study of international distance learners’ (non)use of technology. Distance Education, 32(1), 85–99. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2011.565500

U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.) Vatterott College-Memphis. Retrieved from http://ope.ed.gov/accreditation/InstAccrDetails.aspx?756e697469643d3136393333362663616d70757349643d30267264743d352f362f3230313220373a32353a313920504d

van Dijk, J. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements, and shortcomings. Poetics, 34, 221–235. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004

Vatterott Career College-Memphis Dividend Drive. (n.d.) In Edu Mojo. Retrieved from http://www.edumojo.com/college/collegedetails/school/Vatterott+College+Memphis__2655+Dividend+Drive,+Memphis,+Tennessee+38132__TN__440873

Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on Blended Learning in Higher Education. International Journal On E-Learning, 6(1), 81-94.

Lana Sumpter, Northcentral University