BLACKLIGHTâ„¢ POWER, INC. - New Energy Times

VOLUME 6, NUMBER 8 ISSN 1075-0045 March 1999

Web Page: www.padrak.com/ine/ E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]

1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCEON FREE ENERGY

U.S. Dept. of State, Washington, D.C., USAApril 29-30, 1999, Workshops: May 1, 1999

Hosted by the Secretary of State Open Forum

Objectives: Educate the private and public sectors about

free energy Explain how it is superior to centralized power

generation Emphasize the planetary urgency for its

adoption Broaden deregulation choices free of

combustion-pollution Discuss the availability of various free energy

systems Analyze free energy science regarding input

and output

Scheduled Plenary Speakers:Dr. Paul Brown, Nuclear Solutions, Inc.;Dr. Edmund Storms, Los Alamos Labs (retired);Dr. Paulo Correa; Les Adams, AZ Industries; Dr.Peter Graneau, Ctr. for EM Research; DavidWallman; Chris Flavin, Worldwatch Inst.; Dr.David Goodwin, DOE; Bruce Perrault; ChipRansford, Nova Resources Group; Dr. DeborahD.L. Chung, SUNY/Buffalo; Dr. Tom VanFlandern, Meta Research; James Griggs,HydroDynamics, Inc.; Kent Robertson, Am. WindEnergy Assoc.

For further information contact the co-sponsor:Integrity Research Institute, 1422 K Street NW,Suite 204, Washington, DC 20005202-452-7674, 800-295-7674Fax: 301-513-5728<[email protected]> http://www.erols.com/iri

BLACKLIGHT™ POWER, INC.

The FIRST Commercialization ofa New-Energy Device!

In the January 1992 issue of Fusion Facts Dr.Randell L. Mills was named as a FusionScientist of the Year 1991. Here is a quotefrom the article: "On April 26, 1989, Dr. Mills hadfiled a patent for 'Energy/Matter ConversionMethods and Structures.' Dr. Mills states, '...wescaled it up greater than a factor of a thousandand we have right now a cell running that is acommercial demonstration of this technology.We're pushing right now ... we have a contractwe're pursuing that will give us a one kilowatt --a one thousand watt home heating unit withinfour months. We have the electrochemicalpower cell -- it is running. It has the capacity ofputting out a thousand watts. And we are waitingfor the heat exchanger unit to interface with that[power cell] and we will have a prototype of ahome heating unit.'"

Dr. Mills related that he had begun thetheoretical work leading to his discovery in 1988,working about a year before beginning the over350 experiments looking for tritium andoptimizing conditions. That was seven yearsago. During the past seven years, Dr. Mills hasdeveloped his new-energy device to the currentstate where he has announced commer

10-YEAR ANNIVERSARYThe first public announcement of thediscovery of cold fusion was made on March23, 1989. After ten years, there is one new-energy device being commercialized.

See the following report.

2 MARCH 1999

©1999 by Fusion Information Center, Inc. COPYING NOT ALLOWED without written permission. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Editorial

Dr. Randell L. Mills

cialization by the sale of licenses to energycompanies that desire to enter the market withthis new-energy technology.

We congratulate Dr. Mills for his excellentdevelopment work. He has progressed from aliquid electrolyte cell to a high-temperature-producing gaseous cell. In addition, he hasconvincing evidence that this cell is not based onnuclear reactions but on a new type of chemicalreaction. Here is the way Dr. Mills describes hisinvention.(Quoted from www.blacklightpower.com):

A fundamental new-energy source (theBlackLight™ process) has been derivedtheoretically and confirmed empirically byBlackLight Power Inc. (BLP). The process is notnuclear -- neither fission nor fusion, nor is itchemical in the usual sense, in that there is nomolecular alteration. The BlackLight T.M. process,developed by Randell L. Mills, BlackLight'spresident, is a catalyt ical ly - inducedtransformation of hydrogen energy states tolevels below the "ground state", as defined bygenerally-accepted atomic theory.

We congratulate Dr. Randell L. Mills for being thefirst to get a new-energy technology to market.For further information see the Website.

WHEN IS A SCIENTIST NOT A SCIENTIST?By Hal Fox, Editor

One of the types of scientific action that hasalways puzzled me has been the rejection of newscientific discoveries. Here are some examples:

1875: Gasoline in the hands of people ... wouldconstitute a fire and explosive hazard of the firstrank. ... The development of the new power maydisplace the use of horses, which would wreckour agriculture. Congressional Record of 1875.

1902: Flight by machines heavier than air isunpractical and insignificant, if not utterlyimpossible. New York Times, December 10,1903.

1910: The popular mind often pictures giganticflying machines speeding across the Atlanticcarrying innumerable passengers in a wayanalogous to our modern steamships. ... Itseems safe to say that such ideas are whollyvisionary. William Pickering, Americanastronomer.

1923: There is no likelihood man can ever tapthe power of the atom. The glib supposition ofutilizing atomic energy when our coal has run outis a completely unscientific Utopian dream, achildish bug-a-boo. Robert Millikan, TheoreticalPhysicist.

1937: Thus it appears that the cyclotron cannotbe made to give much higher energies thanthose obtained thus far. Hans Bethe, in PhysicalReview.

1945: The biggest fool thing we've ever done.The atom bomb will never go off and I speak asan expert on explosions. Admiral William Leahy,aide to President Roosevelt.

1999: Commenting on low-energy nuclearreactions: How stupid do you think we are? My

NEW ENERGY NEWS 3


assessment of you and your colleagues is thatyou are complete frauds or totally mad. There isno known physical principle that would supportthe kind of results that you claim your technologycan accomplish, nor is there any credibleargument why there should be such a principle.Name of scientist withheld in hope of a return tosanity.

As a scientist, as an inventor, as the formerdirector of a research laboratory, as a formermissile system engineer, I do not understandhow any person can call himself or herself ascientist and exhibit such a closed mind tonew scientific discoveries!

The essence of science is discovery. Theantithesis of science is emotional outbursts in aneffort to maintain current dogma. There isprobably no science graduate who does not pokefun at those who were so wrong in theirdeclarations about aircraft, missiles, atomicenergy, etc. What is there in our educationalsystem or in our culture that would even permit(let alone encourage) such unscientificdeclarations. There is no question that anyonehas a right to freedom of expression in thiscountry -- not to include crying FIRE! in acrowded building. How can anyone, who deemshim- or her-self to be a scientist make a blanketstatement that "...you and your colleagues ... arecomplete frauds or totally mad." Suchdeclarations are not only extremely unpro-fessional but verge on character assassination.

The statement "There is no known physicalprinciple that would support the kind of resultsthat you claim your technology can accomplish..."is merely an admission of lack of omnipotence.That statement could have been said abouttransistors in 1945 by anyone who had not beenexposed to the very new study of solid-statephysics. The statement is certainly correct if theperson had said "...no physical principle, knownto me..." Therefore, whenever a self-proclaimedscientist makes such a statement, one canacknowledge that it is a statement of incompleteknowledge of all science.

As editor of this publication and as editor of theJournal of New Energy, we have no problem in

admitting that we don't know it all. If we did,there would be no reason for research, nor forpublishing anyone else's work. It is a worthypursuit of science to delve into the understandingof the world around us. We are very fortunate tohave world-girdling friends among scientists inmany countries. They send us papers. Theirpapers are peer reviewed. Known errors arepointed out. Corrections to English are oftenmade. Papers that present new idea even ifhighly contrary to present scientificunderstanding are published. This publicationhas had the honor of being the first to report(and name) the Aspden Effect and the RoweEffect. It was in this paper that it was firstsuggested that a new discovery could explain thered shift. Professor Anastasovski was delightedwith the suggestion and he immediately wrote apaper showing that this suggestion was indeedappropriate (published in the Journal of NewEnergy). The Big Bang? Scientific dogma.

The Journal of New Energy has published sixarticles (most from Russia) where severalscientific groups have studied torsion fields andreported their speed to be many times fasterthan the speed of light. Those papers resulted inour suggestion, "SETI, you are listening in thewrong spectrum," for Search for Extra-TerrestrialIntelligence. The claim that information cannotbe communicated at speed faster than the speedof light -- is also scientific dogma.

What a thrill it is for all of us here to be involvedin discoveries, in receiving marvelous papers(and some bad ones), in publishing newdiscoveries, and to be involved in our ownresearch and making our own discoveries. Weare not here to preserve any scientific discipline.We want to change the world's ways of creatingand distributing energy. And we are beingsuccessful!

Here is our latest scientific finding: Be aware,this is an analytical result and not, as yet, provenin the laboratory: High-density charge clusterscan be used in such a manner that anaccelerator of positive ions can be designed thatis at least one million times more effective (int ransmut ing elements) than previousaccelerators! I wonder what the issuer of our

4 MARCH 1999


Fusion Briefings

1999 quote (above) would say about thatstatement.

Here is, in part, our answer to Dr. Blank: "No onethinks you are stupid. Perhaps not yet informed.... If you have a scientific interest in this newtechnology, I would be happy to provide you withboth domestic and foreign references. Thistechnology was discovered first in America,second in Belarus, third in Russia, and latest inChina."

We hope to hear again from “Dr. Blank.” (Whatwould you have said?)

REPORT ON RCCNT-6

6 th Russian Conference on Cold NuclearTransmutation of Chemical Elements tookplace in Sochi, Russia from Sept 28 to Oct 3,1998. The conference was held under theauspices of the Russian Academy of Sciences,Russian Physical Society, Nuclear Society ofRussia, Russian Mendeleev Chemical Society,Moscow Lomonosov State Univ., Russian Univ.of Peoples’ Friendship, and Moscow StateTechnical Univ. (MADI).

18 representatives from Russia, Ukraine,Germany and Japan attended the conference.22 papers were delivered: 7 theoretical, 12experimental research, and 3 on applications.One report included a video on the experimentalwork by one of the groups.

The Experimental papers delivered havedemonstrated further accumulation of newinformation, increasing in reliability andreproducibility to approach 100% in someexperiments. Five reports contained informationof reliable detection of Gamma-radiation, threepapers concerned mass-spectrometric datashowing nuclear transmutation, and two referredto detection of neutrons. Six authors who stated100% reproducibility of the effects detected are

Bazhutov, Kanarev, Karabut, Savvatimova,Notoya, and Koldomasov.

Participants of the conference agreedunanimously about the necessi ty ofinvestigations confirmed by 100% reproducibilityof results. They agreed about the expediency ofdeveloping reliable demonstrations with aperspective to their applied utilization both inenergies and for initiation of cheap nucleartransmutation technologies.

The co-chairmen were Academician V.E.Kazarinov and Professor Yu.N. Bazhutov. Thenext RCCNT-7 is to take place in May 1999.[See announcement page 25]

NEUTRON YIELD

Adrian Serban, Sing Lee (Nanyang Technol.Univ., Nat. Inst. Edu., Singapore), “The Effect ofHigh Axial Sheath Velocity on Neutron Yield inPlasma Focus,” Fusion Tech., vol 35, no 1, Jan.1999, pp 54-60, 20 refs, 6 figs, 3 tables.

ABSTRACT

To study the effect of higher axial sheathvelocities on neutron production, the geometry ofthe inner electrode (anode) of a 3-kJ Mather-typeplasma focus device was modified. Double-stagestepped-anode configurations were tested with aspeed-enhanced region long enough for a sig-nificant increase in speed but not long enough toallow the development of force-field flow-fieldseparation at the end of the axial phase. Peakaxial speeds up to 15 cm/s were achievedwithout modifying the deuterium filling pressureand charging voltage. The neutron and soft X-rayproductions were found to be dependent onsheath velocity. A new scaling law for thenonbeam component of the neutron yield wasproposed.

INTRODUCTION

Plasma focus devices are very efficient pulsed -radiation sources of neutrons and X rays (softand hard) that could be used for practicalapplications. Therefore, efforts are now devoted

NEW ENERGY NEWS 5


to studies of radiation mechanisms and methodsto enhance the radiation yield.

Our analysis of published data for Mather-typeplasma focus devices in their wide range of sizes,i.e., energy stored in the driver, from 1 kJ to1 MJ, shows the following experimentallyobserved features: Plasma focus devices can beoptimized either for large X-ray output or for highneutron production, and for neutron-optimizedoperating conditions they all

1. operate in a narrow range ofdeuterium-filling pressures of several torr

2. have a maximum density of pinchedplasma of 1 to 5 x 10 19 cm -3

3. have the same limited peak axial sheathaxial of 10 cm/s and radial on-axis collapsespeed of 25 cm/s

4. are driven by a standard value of a driveparameter (Ip/a) / p0 , the peak drive current perunit anode radius divided by the square root ofthe fill density, of 89 (±8) kA/cm/(Torr D 2)

1/2 [forsimplicity, gas density is replaced by pressure,and the drive parameter is written as (Ip /a)/ p1/2 ]

5. follow the total neutron yield scaling lawwith the focus current Yn ~ I4 .

The constancy of the drive parameter ensures forall machines the same value of drive magneticfield in the axial phase and the same compressedenergy density in the focus phase, leading to thesame high temperature in all devices. Theconstancy of the plasma sheath velocities fixesthe forward shock temperature on-axis at 1.4 x106 K and the on-axis reflected shock tempera-ture at 3.6 x 106 K; further compression brings thetemperature of the gross plasma column to justunder 1 keV. The neutron scaling law shows thatthe larger plasma focus devices produce moreneutrons. This increased neutron yield appearsto be due only to a combination of the largervolume of the focused plasma and theconsequent increase in lifetime of the focusedregion. It was shown that each linear dimensionof the approximately cylindrical focus or pinch re-gion is proportional to the anode radius. Goodfocusing effect is usually obtained in plasmafocus experiments when the peak axial sheathvelocity is within the limited range of 6 to 10

cm/s and a drive parameter of ~89 kA/cm/(TorrD2)

1/2. The lower speed limit is easily understoodin terms of poor coupling of the magnetic pistonwith the driven plasma layer, indicated by a lowmagnetic Reynolds number Rem, or in terms oflow specific energy. For the higher speed limit,it appears that the high Rem, leads to an effectiveseparation of the magnetic piston from thecenter of the plasma layer. The plasma layerthen collapses radially, while the magnetic pistonis still driving axially.

DEUTERON ABSORPTION IN TITANIUM

L. Meléndez, E. Chávez, R. López, G.J. Cruz,M.G. Olayo, A. Chávez, M. Balcázar (Inst.Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, PlasmaPhys. Lab., Mexico), “Titanium Deuteration withNeut ron Emiss ion through Elect r ica lDischarges,” Fusion Tech. , vol 35, no 1, Jan.1999, pp 71-77, 16 refs, 7 figs.

ABSTRACT

To search for the absorption of deuterium gas intitanium plates and the neutron emission fromthis process, electrical discharges between twotitanium electrodes in a deuterium atmospherehave been performed. During the discharges, atemperature > 300° C on the surface of theelectrodes was measured. A typical charac-teristic of the phenomenon observed was thedeuteration of the electrodes. Pressure

COLD FUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY

Just updated and revised, the most completebibliography of New Energy research papersand articles [predominantly cold fusion] isavailable again from the Fusion InformationCenter on 2 disks [PC]. Containing over 2500references, it traces the progress of coldfusion research since its beginning in 1989through the abstracts and articles published inFusion Facts, the world's first cold fusionnewsletter/magazine, and abstracted fromother scientif ic publications. SpecifyWordPerfect v6.1 version, or ASCII version.$15.00 ppd.

6 MARCH 1999


Rad-Waste

reduction was notorious when the chamber waspreviously cooled with liquid air. Deuteriumabsorption seemed to be present in allexperiments whether or not liquid air was addedon the deuteration chamber. Sheets of CR-39plastic detectors, a Bonner sphere, and a fissionchamber were used to look for neutron emission.

RACE TO CLEAN UP WASTE

Staff, "Race to Clean Up Waste, DestroyingNuclear Waste Could Take Seconds", NewScientist, Jan 13, 1999.

It is reported that European and Americanphysicists are back to transmutation. Animportant voluminous DOE-funded study ontransmutation is: Nuclear Wastes: Technologiesfor Separations and Transmutation , Committeeon Separations Technology and TransmutationSystems, Board on Radioactive WasteManagement, Commission on Geosciences,Environment, and Resources, National ResearchCouncil, published by National Academy Press,Washington, D.C. c1996 by the NationalAcademy of Sciences.

This study investigated high-energy beamdevices as a method of transmuting high-levelradioactive wastes and concluded that there wasno technology more cost-effective than geologicstorage. Apparently, some one is having secondthoughts. The example given in the NewScientist article is Technetium-99 which isproduced by nuclear reactors to build up six tonsa year of an isotope having a half life of 213,000years.

The transmutation is done by neutrons. Neutronscan transmute Technetium-99 into Technetium-100 with a half life of 15.8 seconds (which decaysinto Ruthenium-100, a stable element). Thephysics community has been attacking coldfusion, especially when transmutation isdemonstrated. "You can't do that with low

energy!", complains the physicists (except forsome notably more-intelligent physicists andelectro chemists who have repeatedlydemonstrated transmutation at low energies).

One of these days, maybe the New Scientist willeven discover New Energy.

NEVADA SAYS NO TO NUCLEAR WASTECourtesy of Gary Vesperman

Sean Whaley & Ed Vogel, "Legislators adoptresolution against nuclear waste." Las VegasReview-Journal, 9 Feb 99, pg 4B.

By a vote in the senate of 19-1 and a vote in theassembly of 40-0, the Nevada legislatureadopted a resolution not to use Yucca Mountainfor the permanent storage of nuclear waste. Thereasons are: Rainwater percolates through therepository site in a relatively short 50-year timespan, therefore radioactivity could be carried byrainwater into the ground water. Also theseismic activity makes Yucca Mountainunsuitable for a long-term repository. TheNevada legislators are most concerned withpending national legislation that would removethe requirement for determining site suitability atYucca Mountain.

HANFORD PROJECT FINDS LISTENERS

Associated Press, “Response to Hanford Project‘Overwhelming’,” Las Vegas Sun, Wed., 17 Feb.1999, p 2A; and “Radiation Research GarnersBig Response,” Las Vegas Review-Journal,Wed., 17 Feb, 1999, p 10B.

The Hanford Individual Dose Assessment projectwas started in fall 1998, to provide exposureestimates of those “downwinders” living in partsof Washington, Oregon and Idaho during theearly years when Hanford experienced radio-active iodine releases. These downwindersprovided the state with information about theirlocation during the years of 1945 to 1957, anddetailed dietary items such as milk consumption,poultry consumption and sources, and whetheror not they grew their own fruits and vegetables.

NEW ENERGY NEWS 7


A specialized database was then used tocorrelate all the information and come up with anestimate of the levels of exposure to theradioactive iodine-131 released from Hanford.

This project has received almost 11,000 inquiriesfrom all over the world, and some 8,000 of themhave already answered the dose assessmentapplications, according to information from thestate Department of Health. They consider theresponse overwhelming, and plan to extend theproject until spring, since it had been only beeninitially funded for 2,500 people.

JUST SAY NO!, NEVADA

Cy Ryan, “Nevada Officials United AgainstNuclear Dump,” Las Vegas Sun, Wed., 17 Feb.1999, p 1B.

The battle to keep high-level radioactive wasteout of Nevada, as lately seen in the summitmeeting on nuclear waste hosted by NevadaGovernor Kenny Guinn, has the congressionaland state leaders in almost unanimousagreement. The US House bill to use the YuccaMountain site for temporary high-level nuclearwaste storage has been called “a death sentenceon Nevada.”

President Clinton had promised to veto the bill,but Nevadans must rally enough support in theHouse to uphold the veto, and thereby avoidhaving it taken to the Senate. The vote maycome as early as next month.

MORE ON YUCCA MOUNTAIN

Keith Rogers, “Nevada Officials United in Plansto Stop Nuke Waste,” Las Vegas Review-Journal, Wed., 17 Feb. 1999, p 1A.

After over viewing the current state of Nevada’s17 year-long campaign to keep high-level nuclearwaste out of their state, and the President’spromise to veto the House Resolution 45 whichwould make Yucca Mountain the next dump, thisarticle goes on to point out some of the hazardsthere.

Nevada’s Nuclear Projects Agency needs 4.7million in funding for continued analysis ofscientific issues about a repository site, such asvulnerability to flooding, waste storage, corrodingcontainers and transportation of the rad wasteinto the environment. A major danger at theproposed site arises from the need to removecurrent defective storage canisters, andrepackage the waste they contain. Thisreplacement procedure is highly vulnerable tostrong ground motion, and the Yucca Mountainsite is only 31 miles from the Furnace CreekFault in Death Valley, CA, which has thepotential of a magnitude 8 earthquake, accordingto recent calculations.

SENATOR IGNORING PUBLIC OPINIONCourtesy Gary Vesperman

Staff, “A Legislator Embracing Surrender,” LasVegas Sun, Wed., 17 Feb, 1999, p 10 A.

Someone is not listening to which way the windis blowing. At the same time that NevadaGovernor Kenny Guinn is holding a nuclearwaste dump summit in Las Vegas, NevadaSenator Bill O’Donnell (R-Las Vegas) isquestioning the need to fight against high-levelnuclear waste being sent to the Nevada YuccaMountain site. His comments were made to thestate’s Assembly-Senate budget committeewhich watchdogs the Federal investigation overthe suitability of the Yucca Mountain area. Sen.O’Donnell doubts the ability of the state to stopthe Federal plans at all.

In a Nevada poll released in January, theopposition to the dumping numbered 77% of thesouthern Nevadans whose “backyard” is theproposed site. Only 6% supported it. Theradioactive dumping plan is considered the No.1 environmental threat to Nevada. The currentresidents and future generations have theirhealth and safety at stake here.

Science is the art of the Soluble.-- Peter Brian Medawar

8 MARCH 1999


Miscellaneous

Report on the 2nd International Symposiumon Consciousness, New Medicine and NewEnergy held 26, 27 Nov., 1998, Tokyo, Japan.Shiuji Inomata (President, Japan PsychontronicsInstitute)

The symposium started with about 300participants at Ibuka Hall, Waseda University,(which was donated by late Mr. Ibuka, founder ofSONY Corp.) at 10 a.m. by my opening greeting,which was followed by a welcome speech byProf. Okushima, President of Waseda University.The president stated that it is very significant tostudy phenomena which have not yet beenunderstood by conventional science. Inmedicine, we have studied only Westernmedicine but we should study Ki (Spirit) andEastern medicine together with Westernmedicine from now on.

Prof. Brian Josephson, Nobel prize physicist fromCambridge University, UK, in his opening lectureentitled "The Paranormal and The PlatonicWorld," commented at the discovery of variousparanormal phenomena, conventional scientificworld view and orthodox physics have reached alimit. He also pointed out that the so-calledTheory of Everything (T.O.E) has collapsed andour science has entered in a new phase. BesideProf. Josephson, Mr. David Lorimer, Director,Scientific and Medical Network, UK, Dr. BrianO'Leary, Hawaii, U.S.A., Dr. Beverly Rubik, SanFrancisco, U.S.A. were invited as the overseasspeakers.

Six new-energy-related abstracts out of 15representations have been already printed in theNew Energy News, Jan. 1999, and thesymposium proceedings are now edited for thepublication. But my judgement as the chairmanof the organizing committee is that we arrived atnew paradigm science which could accommodateperpetual mobile-like free energy devices as wellas the paranormal phenomena in the 2ndsymposium. The symposium related TV programwas televised nation-wide on the evening of 31

Dec., and the viewers reportedly amounted toover ten million, and 80% of them recognized thereality of the paranormal phenomena, such asclairvoyance and metal-bending, therebyterminating the ESP controversies in Japan.

References (S. Inomata)

1. The 2nd Interational Symposium onConsciousness, New Medicine and New Energy,Abstract Book, Organizing Committee, Nov.,1998.2. S. Inomata, “Science of Consciousness andNew Scientific World-View - We are in the midstof the second Copernican Revolution,” Journal ofNew Energy, Vol. 2, No, 3-4.3. S. Inomata, “Complexified EM, Gravity AndEnergy,” Journal of New Energy, Vol. 3, No. 1.4. “Space-Time and Consciousness,” (SympsiumProceeding) to appear Tokuma Shoten, Tokyo.

NEW ENERGY - WHERE IS IT?By Hal Fox, Editor

In an editorial in the Space Energy Journal(December 1998 issue), Don Kelly asks thequestion, "New Energy - What is it? and Whereis it?" In this editorial, Don Kelly makes thefollowing observation: "It is an appalling fact thatwe have not witnessed any tangible progress inelectrical engineering since the turn of thecentury, when Faraday's induction, or thespinning of magnets past electrical coils, becamethe practical and accepted way to produceelectricity for all applications."

Well, Don Kelly (and the rest of our readers), wehave a reply to that thought-provokingstatement. There has been new developmentsin new energy production. Please read at leastthe first page of U.S. Patent 5,018,180 (inventor:Kenneth R. Shoulders). The first line of theAbstract states: "Disclosed are apparatus andmethod for obtaining energy from high electricalcharge density entities." This author has writtenmore about "high-density charge clusters" thanall other writers and can assure you that this is anew technology that may just revolutionize theway we produce and distribute energy.

NEW ENERGY NEWS 9


Some years ago, NEN was contracted by thosewhom we call the "Cincinnati Group". Theydiscovered some interesting phenomena whichturned out to be due to the formation and use ofhigh-density charge clusters in a water solution.Dr. S-X. Jin, Chief Scientist for Trenergy, Inc.,has provided the best (to date) analyticaldescription of these high-density, electron,charge clusters. This technology is new. Thistechnology is important. We now stand on thethreshold of a new method of handlingradioactive wastes (the LENT reactor), and forthe future handling of high-level, radioactive,spent-fuel pellets. This is the second importantapplication of this charge-cluster technology.

Kenneth Shoulders and the Cincinnati Group arenot alone in the discovery of the importance ofthis new technology. One scientist in theRepublic of Belarus and a scientist in Russiahave also rediscovered this technology. In Chinasome work is being pursued that is very close tothis technology – by translation they call itpseudo-sparks.

This may not be the kind of new-energytechnology that Don Kelly would like to see. Don,and many of the rest of us would like to havesimple devices that we can make at home andpower our houses. We are about as likely tomake these charge-cluster devices at home aswe are to make our own transistors. Althoughevidence for these charge clusters has beenreported in the literature for more than 80 years,it took a laboratory genius like KennethShoulders to discover the true nature of theseenergetic little (typical ring of charge clusters areabout one thousandth of an inch in diameter)toroids of energy and to tame them.

It took while for the world to convert Faraday'sstudies of electromagnetic induction into usefuldevices. It will take a lot less time to convert KenShoulders' important discovery into new-energydevices and systems. Very early next centuryshould see the commercialization of this newtechnology. In the meantime, Don Kelly (andthe rest of you) don't give up on mankind'singenuity and ability to solve our energyproblems. Worry more about those who will denythe possibility of such an enormously important

development. But those kind have always beenwith us and have informed the world thatheavier-than-air craft, missiles, atomic energy,cold fusion, and many other new developmentswouldn't fly or couldn't work. One of the frequentand least-intelligent comments is "If it were thateasy, it would have already been discovered!"

VOICE-RECOGNITION SOFTWARE

Bill Gates, "How close is voice recognitionsoftware?", Deseret News, Jan 17, 1999, p M-1.

Bill Gates says, "Many companies, includingmine, are investing heavily in it." Later he says,"To be really useful...the software has to get a lotcloser to perfect." Bill Gates, who would allowhis company to produce an operating systemthat can be modified by a program and therebyhave to reinstall the operating systemperiodically, is ill-informed about the latest voice-recognition software. The Utah-based fonixcorporation (they like lower case) is marketingtheir phoneme-based voice recognition softwareto medical doctors. The result, after about thirtyminutes of training, is that the transcription isless error-prone than the old-fashioned dictationand transcription. Now the doctor's remarks godirectly into the patient's records. Evenbillionaires have a hard time keeping up with thelatest technology.

GLOBAL WARMING & NEW ENERGYCourtesy of Dr. Wingate Lambertson

John J. Fialka, "Clinton Plan Aims to Curb theEffects of Global Warming," Wall Street Journal,26 Jan 99.

This article in the WSJ lists a variety of plannedfunds to spend to encourage development ofenergy-efficient vehicles, homes, and heatingand cooling equipment. The article ends with thefollowing: "The proposal also includes a $347million increase in government research anddevelopment programs financing industry effortsto produce more fuel-efficient cars, heatingequipment and energy-producing devicespowered by solar, wind, and geothermal sources

10 MARCH 1999


as well as the burning of agricultural wastes."Thoughtful question: Why is there no mentionof any kind of new-energy device or system. Thepredecessor agency to the current Department ofEnergy was Energy Research and DevelopmentAdministration (ERDA) and that agency fundedthousands of studies on solar, wind, geothermal,tide, and biomass projects - almost none ofwhich were commercially viable. Why is thefederal government so destitute of new-energyconcepts and so reluctant to fund something thatmight be more cost effective than currentpolluting systems of energy development? EvenNEN doesn't have an answer to that question.However, we do have answers to the problem ofproducing cleaner and less expensive energy.

MAKING ION THREADS

William J. Beaty, "Experiments with Ion Threads,"Electric Spacecraft J., Jul/Aug/Sept Issue 27, pp14-15.

EDITOR'S SUMMARY

Wm. Beaty reports on an interesting andrelatively easy-to-replicate experiment. Here ishow to do it: Put one cm of hot water in a flat-bottomed pan. Add a few chips of dry ice. Thiswill produce a white mist much like that producedin a Wilson Cloud Chamber. Now take a 10,000volt (or thereabouts) high-voltage, low-amperage,direct-current power supply. (Such voltages areused in all cathode-ray tube devices like TVs andcomputer monitors.) Attach the cathode wirefrom the power supply to a needle. Connect theanode side to the bottom of the pan. Point theneedle in any direction and you should get a flowof emitted ions -- an ion wind.

Point this ion wind at the surface of the cloudabove your pan of water with dry ice. The authornoted that there were parallel threads of ionsemitted from such a wire and needle. Also, hairson the back of the hands would emit suchstreams of ions. The item of most interest isstated: "The big mystery is: If these threads aresimply charged wind, why do they form suchnarrow streams? Charged wind should self-repeland fan out. In addition, the streams move veryfast, considering that they are made from air. ...

Something is binding these streams together sothe like charges don't spread. Something isaffecting their boundary layer and preventingimmediate turbulent disruptions."

[I'm sure that a lot of NEN readers can replicatethis experiment. Please let us know what youdiscover. Editor.]

LOW OIL PRICES - U.S. LOSES?Courtesy of Gordon B. Moody

Gordon B. Moody, editor, Global Energy Outlook,Jan 1999, vol 4/ No. 1.

In an article entitled, "Clinton AdministrationProposes Lifting Restriction on Iraqi Oil Exports,"Gordon Moody discusses the rationale behindthe extremely low oil prices: "So far, almostnone of the OPEC members have adhered fullyto existing promises to reduce output by 2.6millions barrels per day. Some analysts believethat members of the cartel hope to increase theirown world market share, and at the same time,force higher-cost producers out of the market.More than fifteen thousand U.S. stripper wellshave been permanently capped as a result of lowoil prices, never to be returned to service again."Assume that these stripper wells (wells thatproduce only a few barrels of oil per day, usuallyby pumping) produce only 3 barrels of oil perday. If the oil price is so low that the productioncosts do not pay for operation, then the owner isrequired to close the well. The cost of openingsuch a well is considered to be too high to everget such a well back into production. Assume

NEW ENERGY NEWS BIBLIOGRAPHY

Jus t updated f rom INE, a comple tebibliography is available containing over1000 references, listing all the articles,papers and abstracts published in the NewEnergy News since we began back in 1993.Request PC WordPerfect 6.1 or ASCIIformat. Copies are US$10, postage andhandling included. INE, 3084 E 3300South, Salt Lake City, UT 84109, or call801-466-8680

NEW ENERGY NEWS 11


that the figure of 15,000 wells is accurate. Thismeans that about 50,000 barrels of oil per dayfrom U.S. internal production has now beenpermanently closed. This means that with $20per barrel for oil, about $1,000,000/day ofadditional U.S. dollars must be sent abroad topay for oil that we no longer pump out of U.S. oilfields. That is about $365 million per year lost tothe U.S. and gained by foreign oil-producingcountries.

HUBBLE FINDS MORE GALAXIES

AP Staff, "Hubble helps find billions of newgalaxies," Deseret News, 9 Jan 1999, p A3.

The farther the Hubble Space Telescope looksinto space, the more galaxies that are found.Earlier, astronomers estimated that there wereabout 80 billion galaxies in the universe. Now,the universe has grown to an estimated 125billion galaxies. Want to bet that with the nextimprovements in celestial observation, theuniverse will expand again? The currenttime/distance that the Hubble Space Telescopesees is estimated at eleven billion light-years.That figure is considerably older than theuniverse was thought to be just a few years ago.The limits to the universe are predicated on theconcept of a Big Bang. The Big Bang was anexplanation for the concept of the red-shift oflight. The farther away the star (or galaxy) is, theredder the light, which was interpreted by theidea that the farther away a galaxy is, the fasterit is moving away from us. A simpler explanationis that light loses energy as it travels throughmillions of light years of space. Now thatAnastasovski has shown an interaction betweenphotons and charged particles -- the photon canlose energy by such an interaction. Therefore,the photon having less energy would appear tobe red-shifted. There are a lot of chargedparticles in the space between here and 11million light years away. Now we have explainedthe red shift, we don't need the Big Bang. Whichleads me to forecast that the better thetelescopes and observatories the bigger theuniverse will get. Anyone want to try to 200million galaxies and growing?. Ed.

EARTH ENERGY TAP

Louis Roy, "The Prentice Earth Energy Tap,"NEXUS, vol 6, no 1, Dec 98/Jan 99, pp 43-45.

The basic concept explored is that a long wirepositioned above the earth is moved through theair (as a stator), the earth as a rotor, and theresult is the tapping of electrical energy.Perhaps, one could suggest that the earth is therotor but that the aether is the stator. In anyevent, such a long wire, according to a patentissued to Frank Wyatt Prentice on 18 September1923, is a method of getting low-cost power. Ifyou have a place where you can put up a one-mile of wire, please try this experiment and tellus your results.

BIOLOGICAL FUSION

Prof. Panos T. Pappas (Technol. Inst. ofPiraeus, Dept. Phys., Athens, Greece), “ColdFusion in Living Cells,” PACE Newsletter, vol 10,no 1, 1999, pp 21-24, 10 refs.

ABSTRACT

To explain the trans-membrane potential of thecell (TMP), biology adopts an unprovedhypothesis of a process by which sodium, Na, isexchanged with Potassium, K, inside and outsideof cells. The exchange is called the sodium-potassium pump (SPP). SPP leads toelementary contradictions, as noted in theliterature. SPP leads to elementarycontradictions, as noted in the literature. SPP isa best-choice hypothesis based on the exclusionprinciple: namely that it assumes as impossiblecold nuclear fusion of sodium into potassium atthe living cell level.

Yet, the biological SPP process may well be acold nuclear fusion and transmutation of sodiuminto potassium, in the presence of oxygen (SPT).SPT is the most important process sustaining theliving cell and its physiology. SPT and fusion arethe basis of understanding several othermechanisms and similar cold nuclear fusions andtransmutations in biology and medicine.

12 MARCH 1999


The SPT nuclear process is a continuous one inthe human body. It is the core for the sustainedfunction of the heart, and the key for perhaps allcellular metabolism. It explains why the excessof potassium in the blood stream prohibits theSPT nuclear reaction, leading to lack of energy,cardiac arrest and death.

AUTHOR’S CONCLUSION

The assumption of nuclear fusion in biology is notcontradictory. It leads to an understanding ofbiological processes without contradictions. Afterover 10 years observations of PAP IMI electricexposures on living cells, we are led to a correctassumption that the process known today inbiology as the sodium-potassium pump isincorrectly assumed to be a molecular exchange.It is, actually a nuclear process of fusion underelectrical excitation of a Na nucleus, firstly by thecharged cell membrane, and secondly via anendothermic catalytic action of ATP.

JERRY DECKER ABOUT ENERGY

Hi Folks!

The following message is extracted from the freeenergy discussion list hosted by the ineffable BillBeaty. It is of interest here because it appears toindicate that heat/IR energy can be interceptedby specially doped cells to produce electricity.

James Bailey at one time wrote that the wasteheat emanating from a human body was on theorder of 300 Watts. And we are working onposting of an incredible little known documentthat indicates a way to develop crystals that willsap ambient heat for the direct production ofelectricity.

What would happen if you acoustically orresonantly stimulate these IR cells either whilegrowing/depositing the crystals or duringoperation to determine if the efficiency might be'programmed' (ala Sweet) into the material?? Amost intriguing question.

*****

Highlights from my conversation w/Jason Keyesat JX Crystals (near Seattle):

APPLICATION: This is a way to harvestelectricity where you already have a high heatapplication (furnaces, water heaters, etc.)--not apreferential way of producing electricity...unless,like the military, you are determined to eliminateall moving parts (except cooling fan) at any cost.

AVAILABILITY: About 20 Midnite Sun furnacesare available for $2500 as beta site units--pref.sold to end-users located in the Seattle vicinity,and who can provide the most salient feedbackduring this latter development phase. The unitsconsist of a 25K BTU/hr. heater (comparable toa wood-burning stove) with thermo/photo/voltaiccells built in.

OPERATION: Pressurized propane or naturalgas flame heats silicon carbide ceramic emitterwhich glows white hot. Forced air is mixedw/propane to increase flame heat to just under1300°C required to induce the requisite IRfrequencies from the emitter.

144 cells are positioned 1 inch away. Betweenthem is a dielectric (I think they meanDICHROIC) filter: a glass w/sprayed-on layersthat reflects higher (non-electricity producing) IRwavelengths back at the emitter, cooling the cellswhile increasing emitter efficiency by re-heatingit.

Cells respond to 1.7 microns & slightly higher(whereas conventional silicon cells are optimizedfor 1.1+ microns).

OUTPUT: The unit produces 100W, 15W ofwhich is diverted to the forced air system,leaving an available output of 85W @ 12V or24V. The fans improve heater efficiency bycirculating warm air.

The Midnite Sun heater is about 1/4 aselectrically efficient as solar--about 1.5%efficient--when comparing equal collector area,and assuming optimum energy input: in peaksunlight, ~1KW falls on a sq. meter of PVmodule; Midnite Sun, ~40W.

NEW ENERGY NEWS 13


MORE R & D: If you wanted to buy a few cellsfor experimentation, they could be had for~$200/pc; for a few hundred, $40/pc. (the bestdeal is to buy a furnace).

Cells are theoretically capable of 6W: 1W isaffordable w/air forced over cooling fins behindcells; 2W is expensive, a military applicationw/water cooling (or A LOT of air); more Wrequires extravagant cooling measures.

--Russ

This email was sent to Jason Keyes direct and tothe KeelyNet discussion list.

Jason, I was totally enthralled by your page andthe 'thermovoltaics' or 'thermoPHOTO-voltaics'....have to put a link on my site to youguys as you really have something new andtotally novel. http://www.jxcrystals.com/

I have a very rare paper that I plan to post shortlywhich indicates how electrical energy can begathered using properly designed crystals. Ididn't write it but a friend found it in a privatelibrary and we almost have it ready to post. Itindicates you can pull hundreds or more wattsdirectly from the ambient environment, usingelectronics...the paper won a cash prize and noone apparently knows about it.....YET...<g>...

One thing that might increase the efficiency....arethe crystals grown or deposited on the substrate?

There is a group who claims you can inject one ormore frequencies which sets up a kind ofwaveguide in the material that makes it muchless resistive and much more conductive.

Here is Keely's concept of 'graduation';http://www.keelynet.com/keely/grad1.txt

Inducing acoustic superconductivity inconductors;http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/archive/00002257.htm

How to make homemade solar cells from theKeelyNet discussion list;http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/archive/00000002.htm

Good luck and I'll certainly be watching!!

--Jerry Wayne Decker / [email protected]://keelynet.com / Fax : (214) 324-3501

NASA PLEDGES $600,000 FOR ANTIGRAVITYRESEARCHCourtesy of Remy Chevalier

This text is adapted from a story by CharlesSeife which was released for general distributionb y t h e N e w S c i e n t i s t m a g a z i n e([email protected]) on 3 February 1999.

Courtesy of CNINews

NASA has just awarded $600,000 to a projectthat the space agency hopes will duplicate thecontroversial experiments of a Russian scientistwho claims to have invented a device that blocksthe force of gravity. NASA's interest in antigravityis both obvious and practical -- anything thateases the burden of getting big rockets out ofEarth's gravity well and into space is a goodthing. If a device could even partly shield arocket from the Earth's gravity, the spacecraftwould need less thrust to achieve orbit. Mostscientists think this is impossible, but E. E.Podkletnov, a materials scientist at the MoscowChemical Scientific Research Center, is not oneof them. Several years ago, Podkletnov claimedthat he had performed experiments in which aspinning, superconducting disc lost as much as2 per cent of its weight. In practical terms, thatdoesn't sound like much, but to a scientist, it's anastounding claim. And that's when NASAofficials got interested. NASA is now paying anOhio-based company, SuperconductiveComponents, to build a 12-inch (31-centimeter)super-conducting disc to continue a series ofexperiments on gravity shielding. The firstexperiment didn't work, but it wasn't exactly asspecified by Podkletnov, because the first discwas too small. "For a small disc four to fiveinches in diameter, we didn't see anygravitational signal much above the noise of tensof nanogees," says Ronald Koczor, a physicist atNASA's Marshall Spaceflight Center inHuntsville, Alabama.

14 MARCH 1999


However, Koczor and David Noever, also atMarshall, believe that the experiments are worthpursuing. "We're trying to get a 12-inch disc. Wesucceeded in pressing one last November, andwe're trying to set it up to put radio-frequencysignals into the disc," Koczor says. The RFsignals used by Podkletnov, ranging from 100 to1000 megahertz, were evidently an importantfeature of his experiment. According to Ho Paik,a gravitational physicist at the University ofMaryland, they are probably wasting their time."Gravity's produced by mass - it's not producedby quantum mechanics," he says. "I can't seewhy you'd do an experiment based upon physicsthat's completely wrong.” But the team seemsundaunted. Eventually, Koczor and Noever hopeto replicate elements of Podkletnov's experimentmore faithfully. "There will be an exhaustion

point, but in my opinion anyone who proves it'snot worth doing had better have done it in thesame way [Podkletnov] did," says Noever.

SOLAR VIBRATION VEHICLEby Anatoly SukhodolskyGen. Phys. Inst., Russ. Acad.Sci., Moscowe-mail: [email protected]: http://www.gpi.ru/~sukhodol

A test-of-principle-model of the Solar VibrationVehicle (SVV) based on the direct conversion ofsolar light into energy of mechanical vibrations isdescribed. As an engine to propel SVV in givendirection was used Thermo-Hydraulic Actuator(THA) [1] that consists of a chamber with anactive liquid and optical fiber to deliver energy oflight inside. The direction of motion was changedby deviation of point where the radiant energy isabsorbed inside THA with regards to center ofgravity of SVV. Motive forces is due to elasticinteraction of bottom of SVV with a rigid supportthat puts SVV in motion without any wheels byperiodical motion of liquid inside. The frequencyof THA was about 20-1000Hz by duration ofeach mechanical pulse about 200microsec. Themodel of SVV with mass 50g has the velocity ofpropulsion about several millimeter per secondby power of light about 3W simulated bycontinuous wave of a laser beam. The powerwithin each of mechanical shocks within amechanical pulse was about in 10 000 timebigger than average power of continuous light.Since the energy efficiency for space isestimated as 30%, the project of a full-size-prototype of SVV is proposed. The majoradvantages of SVV as a new transporttechnology for future are following: the use ofcheap clean renewable energy of solar light; theprincipal possibility to have a new sort ofvibration transport without wheels; the dramaticsimplicity of construction.

[1] A.T. Sukhodolsky, “Thermo-HydraulicActuator as a New Way for Conversion of SolarEnergy in Space,” Proc. of IECEC'98-ColoradoSprings, 2-6 August 1998 USA (w-site:http://www.gpi.ru/~sukhodol/free/h2/u2.htm)

Listen toThe COSMIC CONNECTION

A unique Tech-Art transformational tool

A technique which may:Reduce and "lift" stress Give a sense ofsafety and well-being Nourish creative thoughtand action Increase spiritual awareness Stimulateverifiable brain-mind coherency Lighten theburdening effects of gravity Provide a DirectConnection with evolving universe Hologramsthrough the audible output of a multi-octave GravityWave Sensor Array. Pitched to the StandardMusical Scale.(This audio tapes gives a general sense of thepotentials. Live is much more powerful.)

Bill Ramsay's workshop says: The device usedconsists of a compact array of a number ofindividual gravity-wave sensors, each selected toform parts of harmonious musical chords andprovide a "topographical" sampl ing ofuniverse-wide influences as these are mirrored byminute fluctuations in the earth's gravity field. It isthought that every cell in the human body is subjectto these influences, which are usually below thethresholds of conscious awareness. The audibleoutput of this array are thought to form asynergistic connection with these influences,thereby allowing conscious awareness of this"cosmic connection."

Cost: $10.00 plus $2 shipping & handling. AudioTape c/o FIC, 3084 E. 3300 South, Salt Lake City,UT 84109.

NEW ENERGY NEWS 15


SPINNING SUPERCONDUCTORby Frank Znidarsic

My experiment with a spinning superconductivedisk has been completed. The disk was coupledto a sewing machine motor. The speed of themotor was varied with a variable auto-transformer. The maximum RPM was about1,000 RPM. The spinning superconductive discwas subjected to an RF field from the coil of atuned circuit. The frequency of the tuned circuitwas varied from 100,000 Khz to 40 Mhz with coiltaps and a tuning capacitor. The RF circuit wasexcited with a spark gap transmitter type ofarrangement. The disk was also subjected to amagnetic field from fixed permanent magnets.

The RF decay constant was observed after eachspark with an oscilloscope. The RF circuit wasrung at 400 times / second from the spark excitercircuit. The RF ringing would die down in about50 micro seconds. 5 liters of liquid nitrogen wereconsumed. No anomalous energy was observed.

Frank Znidarsic

EDITOR'S COMMENTS:

We greatly appreciate Frank Znidarsic'sexperimental work. It might be of interest to notethat the Aspden Effect (rotational inertial changesaffected by spin up, stopping, immediatecontrasted with delayed spin up) was operated at3500 rpm. ["Discovery of 'Virtual Inertia’," NEN,vol 2, no 10, Feb. 1995, pp 1-2.] Other work withsuperconductive disks apparently used muchhigher rpms. An unpublished report found nogravitational effects until rpms of over 10,000were achieved. The T. Townsend Brown effect isonly achieved at very high voltages. It may bethat nature has secrets to disclose only at thesehigher than usual rpms, voltages, etc. Everyexperiment that is properly instrumented,conducted, and reported is valuable. Note thatthe most important feature of the originalMichelson-Morley experiment could beinterpreted to show that the aether revolves withthe earth. Many interpreted the negative resultsas no aether . Later Michelson and Gale did shownon-negative results in measurements of theaether.

SMITH COILPlanetary Association for Clean EnergyNewsletter, vol. 10, no 1, p 2.

Archival material from the Canadian electricalengineer, Wilbert Brockhouse Smith clarifies theproper procedure for the well-known Smith Coil,a caduceus winding demonstrated to have theproperty of producing longitudinal wave and non-Hertzian effects (see research by Toby Grotz,Glen Rein, William Van Bise, ElizabethRauscher), including transmutation. The properwinding is on a ferr i te rod with adiamter-to-length ratio of 1 to 7 - e.g., 1cmdiameter, 7cm long.

This ratio is all-important. For the 7cm rodlength, 14 solid wire Teflon or enamel coated isrecommended, while for the 3½ cm length, 18wire applies. The method of winding is shown inthe illustration below. Place centre of length ofwire behind, then pass right side over left. At therear, pass left side over right. Wind tightlytogether until the complete rod is covered. Endsare connected to equipment such as the TensorEnergy Convertor. The Smith Coil design wasan attempt by Wilbert Smith and his researchcolleagues to make do without a Marconi Coilthey were unable to find.

16 MARCH 1999


OtherPublications

CHIPS MIMIC HUMAN SENSES

Otis Port & Paul C. Judge, staff writers, "ChipsThat Mimic The Human Senses," BusinessWeek, 30 Nov 98, pp 158-59.

EDITOR'S SUMMARY

Digital Signal Processors (DSP) are chips thatrange in size from a few hundred to a few milliontransistors. These chips run at speeds of 1,600MIPS and are forecast to go to 6,000 MIPS nextyear and have computing power approaching thebest computer chips. DSPs are used extensivelyin all types of equipment from automobiles (inyour carburetor, for example) to your VCR orDVD player and, of course, in your cellularphone. Some DSPs are used to control motorsand make them more efficient -- you probablyhave such in your home refrigerator or othermotor-driven applications. Texas InstrumentsInc. is currently the lead of the DSP market witha 45% market share. TI likes DSPs so much thatthey have spun off all of their business that is notDSP! The 1997 market for DSPs was estimatedat $1.44 billion and growing rapidly. Many of thenew energy devices that are being developed willprobably be controlled by DSPs. (Trenergy, Inc.has acquired a 25% interest in a company that isusing DSPs for voice recognition and control.

Therefore, Trenergy will have skills to add to thenew-energy products that we hope will becommercialized early in the next century.)

INFINITE ENERGY CONTENTSCourtesy of Dr. Eugene Mallove

Issue No. 23, January-February 1999 has theusual array of excellent articles. Here are somethat NEN found to be the most interesting:

"Progress in Catalytic Fusion, Birth of aRevolution in Cold Fusion?"This article is an interview with Les Case inwhich he describes how he discovered CatalyticFusion.

"Non-Stellar Nucleosynthesis: Transition metalproduction by DC plasma-discharge electrolysisusing carbon electrodes in a non-metallic cell,"by H.E. Ransford.This article describes a series of experiments(with excellent figures) on obtaining newelements from the underwater arcing of purecarbon electrodes.

"Water Stirring Discovery: Is it connected withcavitation excess energy," by Eugene Mallove.This one-page report is about Kazunari'sdiscovery that by adding cuprous oxide to waterand stirring it, the hydrogen and oxygen can bebroken down. The claim is that the morevigorous the stirring the more hydrogen andoxygen that are produced at room temperatures.

"Joseph Newman's Energy Machine Revisited:Studies by J.L.Naudin and S. Hartmann.This article shows that there appears to be bothpositive and negative spikes produced with theconcept that the larger number of negativecurrent spikes could indeed recharge a batteryinput to the motor.

"Comparisons from the History of Technology"by Jed Rothwell.

WANTED:PLASMA PHYSICIST TO WORK IN UTAH

Trenergy, Inc., with offices in Salt Lake City, Utahhas a job opening for a plasma-physicist withexperience in Low-Energy Nuclear Reactors.Applicant must be willing to relocate to Salt LakeCity, Utah.

Applicants must have a Ph.D. degree orequivalent, with a strong background inmathematical analysis of electric or electronicplasmas. Applicants must have experience inworking with high-density charge clusters. Salarylevel commensurate with experience ($4,000 to$6,000 per month.)

Interested and qualified applicants please contactHal Fox, at 801-466-8680 or send resume by faxto 801-466-8668.

NEW ENERGY NEWS 17


In this article, Jed discusses some wide-ranginghistorical notes from other technologies andsuggests that true science cannot bepermanently curtailed by any group.

"Transmutation of Nuclear Waste Products UsingGiant Dipole Resonant Gamma Rays," by PaulBrown.Paul Brown describes a mechanism by whichgamma rays of the proper energy level canpromote specific nuclear reactions. Brownclaims that properly accomplished gamma rays ofthe correct energy level can cause radioactivematerials to transmute into stable elements.

"An Experiment Indicates the Nuclear Fusion ofthe Proton and Electron into a Neutron" by ElioConte and Maria Pieralice.The abstract states, "An experiment wasperformed that indicates that a proton and anelectron may fuse at low temperatures and at lowenergies to form a neutron plus a neutrino. Theaim of the experiment was to obtain the nuclearfusion of protons and electrons to neutrons at lowenergies."

"Physical Laws of the Emerging New Energies asPredicted by Hadronic Mechanics, II: The NewMechanics" by Ruggero Maria Santilli.Santilli explains that within a range of about onefemtometer, hadronic mechanics rules andoutside of that distance normal quantummechanics provides acceptable explanations.

PLANETARY ASSOCIATION FOR CLEANENERGY(PACE newsletter) vol 10, no 1, 1999

“My Life with Cold Fusion,” Ed Storms (Santa Fe,NM), PACE Newsletter, vol 10, no 1, 1999, pp11-20, 13 refs, 19 figs, 1 table.

“Cold Fusion in Living Cells,” Prof. Panos T.Pappas (Technol. Inst. of Piraeus, Dept. Phys.,Athens, Greece), PACE Newsletter, vol 10, no 1,1999, pp 21-24, 10 refs. (See abstract, p 11)

SPACE ENERGY JOURNALCourtesy of Jim Kettner and Don Kelly

In the December 1998 issue of this quarterlyjournal, the following articles are of interest toNEN readers:

"New Energy -- What is it? -- and Where is It??"The article suggests that more effort should beinvolved in looking into Cold Fusion. It issuggested that polluting power plants can beretrofitted with future Cold Fusion heat-producingunits. Here at NEN, we are betting on the morerapid development of high-density charge clustertechnology (which we believe is the source ofenergy in most of the cold fusion cells). [seeEditor’s comments, p XX]

"The Case for the Over-Balanced Gravity Wheelas a New-Energy Project," examines some of thepossible ways to be considered to harnessgravity. NEN’s judgement is that such a devicemay not work in a uniform gravity field but wouldwork if part of the device were exposed to aweakened gravity field.

"Gravitational Converter Machine," by StefanHartmann. The abstract states: A real workingself-running machine claim is presented anddiscussed. It is discussed why this machine canself-run and convert gravitational energy tomechanical output energy!" The articledescribes a system of water and pistons that aresupposed to provide a machine with the ability tocontinue to rotate with the source of energycoming from the gravitational force.

[Editor's note: There is a fine distinctionbetween energy and force. Energy is thecapacity for doing work. Force is defined(dictionary) as an agency or influence that ifapplied to a free body, results chiefly in anacceleration of the body and sometimes toelastic deformation and other effects.]

The Hendershot solid-state circuit that gets tenwatts output with no electrical input is described.Apparently, considerable care must be used inwinding the basket-weave coils.

18 MARCH 1999


Jean-Louis Naudin's N-Z Motor, version 1.0, ispictured and described in another article. Thismotor is based on the concept that a highly-charged capacitor will orient itself with respect tothe aether and move as the earth turns.Additional work by Naudin is explored.

Kelly's “Gravity-to-Magnetic Field Experiment” isbeing revisited. This is an experiment in which aplate of magnets and coils are dropped. There isa measurable difference between the fall timeswith current on and current off.

In an article entitled, "We Don't Need RelativityAnymore!" the work of S. Inomata, Kozrev, andHayasaka in analyzing the weight changeproduced by a spinning gyro is examined.

NEWS FROM FTIRCourtesy of Antony Sutton

The February, 1999, issue of Future TechnologyIntelligence Report has the following topics:

"Did 1947 Alien Craft Use Cold FusionPropulsion?" Last December, FTIR reviewed acache of released documents. It is believed thatone of the alien craft was using a cold fusion typepropulsion unit. Antony Sutton has written abook, Cold Fusion, Secret Energy Revolution,NEN is requesting a review copy.

"What Happened to the Alien's Technology?"This page recommends the Pocket Book, TheDay After Roswell, NY 1996. Also, the articlesuggests that you look at www.cseti.org on theInternet. A deliberate smoke screen coverup bythe government is suggested.

Book Review: The Giza Power Plant (Techno-logies of Ancient Egypt), by Christopher Dunn,Bear & Co., Santa Fe, 1998, $18. In building theancient pyramids, Egyptians achieved amachining accuracy equaled only today. Wasthe interior of the Pyramid an energy generator?asks Dunn.

In an article about the Roswell incident, the AirForce, and Wilhelm Reich, it is suggested thatthere was an orchestrated cover up, an arrest

and imprisonment of Reich, where he died injail. They also burned his books.

FROM 21st CENTURY SCIENCE & TECH

Dr. Edmund Storms, "What Ever Happened toCold Fusion?", 21st Century Sci.& Technol. , vol11, no 4, Winter 1998/1999, pp 14-18. In thisspecial report, Dr. Storms reviews the almostten-year history and his own involvement.

Rick Sanders, "Thinking about How A FoucaultPendulum Works," 21st Century Sci. & Technol. ,vol 11, no 4, Winter 1998/1999, pg 5. In thisletter to the editor, Sanders, shows that one wayin which a gravitational field could bedistinguished from uniform acceleration would beto take a Focault pendulum with you.

Staff, "Data from Satellites Indicate 'The Sky isFalling'", 21st Century Sci. & Technol., vol 11, no4, Winter 1998/1999, pg 6. Radio telemetry datafrom all deep-space satellites indicated ananomalous gravitation acceleration. This shortarticle suggests that inertial and gravitationalmass are not equivalent. It may be that the sunis increasing in its gravitational attraction bycreating protons within the sun by interactionwith the highly-energetic vacuum energy ofspace (my suggestion, not the article’s. Ed.)

WELCOME TO e-FFICIENCY NEWS

A “select group” is receiving the first edition ofthe Alliance to Save Energy's e-FFICIENCYNEWS. They plan to send out six issues of thiselectronic newsletter this year. They encourageus to forward this message to interestedcolleagues.

If you'd like to get this newsletter yourself, sendthem a message at: <[email protected]>

******CONTENTSPresident's MessageEfficiency NewsEnergy Efficiency Gets $775 Million in FY2000

Budget

NEW ENERGY NEWS 19


Book Review

LETTERSto the Editor & Others

Coalition Asks for Attainable Energy-Efficient

Home Tax CreditFeds Waste $1 Billion Annually on EnergyMultimedia Home Energy Efficiency Campaign

Hits Prime TimePennsylvania Energy Consumers Get

Efficiency Choice* Energy Efficiency Council Established in IndiaUkrainian School Receives Grant from

HoneywellDon't Get Steamed About Industrial Energy

Waste

New and ImprovedBoost Profits With Business Energy CheckupFree Energy Efficiency Educator Lesson Plans

AUTHOR SAYS COLD FUSION IS PROVENTECHNOLOGYCourtesy of Remy Chevalier (Weston, CT)

In a newly published book called Cold Fusion:Secret Energy Revolution, author Antony C. Sutton,D.Sc., declares that cold fusion in several variantsis already working in research labs around theworld and will soon be brought to market by severaldifferent companies.

"Conventional wisdom holds that 'free energy' isimpossible," Sutton says. "Free energy is definedas absence of fuel costs (coal, oil etc.). There isalways a capital cost. According to orthodoxscience, high temperature and pressure is the onlyway to release the energy of the atom.

"This position is now proven wrong. Cold fusiontoday has many variants including catalytic, vaporphase, [and] solid state and has been verified inover 200 laboratories world wide. These includeU.S. government labs... Numerous private firmsworldwide have also confirmed, including Fiat,Motorola, Westinghouse, Toyota, EPRI (ElectricPower Research Institute) and Stanford ResearchInstitute," he says.

Sutton's book reveals that a New Jersey companycalled BlackLight Power, Inc. is on the verge of

announcing a catalytic hydrogen technology that"originates in cold fusion." Another companycalled Catalytic Fusion Power, Inc. "uses astandard, off the shelf carbon platinum catalystwith deuterium gas" to produce power. Thistechnology is currently being scaled up to amarketable level and has been financed by DARPA(Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency),Sutton says.

"Free energy is here with water as fuel and willrevolutionize our world. One device is the size ofa thermos flask, uses water as fuel and lastsindefinitely," Sutton declares.

According to Sutton, the U.S. Department of Statehas announced the First International Conferenceon Free Energy, to be held in Acheson Auditoriumin Washington, D.C., April 29-30, 1999. The StateDepartment realizes that "oil, gas, coal and atomicare on the way out. Middle East oil [is] no longeressential," Sutton says, adding that this will have arevolutionary impact upon the global economy.

Antony Sutton is the author of "WesternTechnology and Soviet Economic Development," athree volume study published by the HooverInstitution at Stanford University, 1968-74, and stillin print. His new book Cold Fusion: Secret EnergyRevolution is published by FTIR Publications, P.O.Box 2903, Sacramento, CA 95812. To order bymail, send $24.95 plus $3.20 postage (in USA);overseas orders please add an extra $5.00.

Courtesy Global Situation Report

LETTER FROM ANATOLY SUKHODOLSKY

As it was mentioned before, the basic feature oflight as motive power is principal possibility to haveefficiency conversion beyond Carnot theorem. Anyof us is able to work by the stable

20 MARCH 1999


temperature around 36.5°C while (Th-To)/Th isconsidered as a dogma, you know. This examplecan simply show, Nature alone knows the conditionto product energy beyond Carnot limit postulated byhuman being for machines.

I have decided to make following step-by-stepactions to promote idea of direct solar energyconversion.

1) In spite of the fact that I am not citizen of USA,I plan to first release ideas of beyond-Carnotconversion within a project for DOE with a chanceto obtain up to $100 000. Key points of projects willbe used for a book only after the project either isaccepted or declined.

2) Since I have the main academic part quite readyfor review, I will try to improve the English enoughto present the manuscript to a publishing companythat can also help to sell it. Without a good sellingpolicy the book is still unclaimed, I think.

As to general strategy for promotion, I think anangel investment can also be tried. As I canimagine, money can be invested into what seems afantastic project. Sometime it is profitable for asponsor to assist in the marketing. I have preparedan abstract, "SOLAR VIBRATION VEHICLE,"attached with this message to familiarize you. Itwas sent to an upcoming meeting on futuretransport technologies (17 - 19 August 1999, CostaM e s a , C a l i f o r n i a , U S Ahttp://www.sae.org/CALENDAR/ftt99tag.htm).They have accepted abstract and the 4-10 pagepaper should be sent for review.

I try to combine this meeting with 34th IECEC whichwill be held in Canada.

At last, could you advise me a reference to thebest, in your opinion, review(s) on cold fusion thatinvolve both: the facts and the skeptics, if possible.I am interested in all known conditions of theexperiment when output of heat is larger than input.

Best regards,Anatoly SukhodolskyFuture Engines and Vehicles

LETTER FROM BERT SCHREIBER

CASIMIR FORCE

I have a question for the readers of NEN on theapparent experimental proof of the Casimir Force.I would like for any reader to explain how suchcould be distinguished from the van der Waal'sForce.

For the van der Waal's Force to exist, it must notbe a boundary ending at the "edge" of an atom's /molecule's "surface". It must extend beyond saidsurface. Therefore, since it must do so, how faraway does said pull effect extend?

How can one prove that what is actually beingmeasured / detected is nothing more than thisextension of said van der Waal's Force?

There is in science, normally more than oneexplanation for any one phenomenon. It is likewisepossible to come to the same "conclusion" fromentirely different, sometimes counterintuitive,theory / postulates or the experimental results mayprove the postulate, yet, be unable to prove sameas the sole origin of result.

In case this is not clear, as three examples: TheSommerfeld Fine Structure Constant can becalculated from no less than 7 different and distinctequations. The existence and numbers ofelectrons in the orbital shells from at least 5different and distinct equations, one completelycounterintuitive; replace mass with holes. The socalled background radiation is likewise just aseasily explained as the radiation given off by theextremely cold [3.7°K] free hydrogen molecules inthe space between and far away from the galaxiesin same. However, the only explanationpromulgated by the establishment is that thisradiation is the leftover remains from thespeculated Big Bang, so proving their theory.Afraid not. It is Occam's Razor distorted to suittheir beliefs to the exclusion of any others.

[Bert has asked an excellent question. Accordingto the Encyclopedia of Physics, the van der Waalsforces are described thus: "These electric fieldscause the electrons in the neighbor to correlatetheir motions with those of the first molecule,leading to dynamic dipole-dipole, dipole-quadrupole, quadrupole-quadrupole, etc.,

NEW ENERGY NEWS 21


attractive interactions. ... These forces, variouslycalled London, van der Waals, or dispersion forcesare universal and account for the major part of thebinding energy of molecular solids, liquids, andeven such weakly bound dimers as AR 2, whichcannot have ordinary chemical bonds." TheCasimir force is related to the forces that appear toform when short-wave electromagnetic energy islimited to the space between two closely-spacedconductors with the concept that the forces on theoutside of the closed-spaced conductors cause theplates to be pushed toward each other by theoutside electromagnetic energy. Ed.]

LETTER 2 FROM BERT SCHREIBEROn the topic of photons and his article in JanuaryNEN

I have no real complaint, other than mostreferences state (i.e., in Scientific American, etc.)That the photon is massless. Likewise in all currentrevisionist scientific dictionaries. I believe I sentyou my paper on the “non-defined” photon whichgave these references. Your reference saying “thephoton has mass” by another would lead thereaders to believe that my entry was wrong. Suchwas not the case. There is no need to print anyerrata on this as it is nit-picking. If any reader pinsme down, I will send them why I said so, along withmy paper on photons.

I had a typo in my submittal. The mass of heneutrino should have been 7.372615, not .... 35.Minor and I doubt anyone will double check myvalue. Very embarrassing, however.

LETTER FROM DAVID DE HILSTER

I want to thank you for your review of the SAABook. It is greatly appreciated. As you know, tryingto get a new idea out is quite a battle but we havesold over 200 books world-wide in less than a yearand physicists, professors, scientists, and studentsalike are starting to seriously look at Carezani'swork.

Just a couple of additions and corrections...

My email is best given for this article [email protected].

Also, we have an extensive website on the subjectat: http://www.autodynamics.org

It has been up for over 3 years now and attracts alot of attention.

One question, could I use your review on theBarnes and Noble site? They ask for write-inreviews and I would like to send your review as isto them. Please let me know.

Again, thanks much for the review. It is greatlyappreciated that you took the time to read the bookand write your opinion.

LETTER FROM GREG HODOWANEC

RESONANT FREQUENCY OF THE AETHER

The following is from an overlooked letter fromGreg Hodowanec, dated September 8, 1996.

Dear colleague: The following may be of interestto you.

POSSIBLE RESONANCES IN THE UNIVERSE.

The fundamental frequency in the Universe is theRyhsmonic (aetheric) frequency f* which is equal to1/T* or 1/5.391 x 10-44 sec. which is about 1.855 x1043 Hz.

Interaction with this fundamental frequency underresonance conditions should result in an exchangeof energy, i.e., energy extraction. Some possibleresonances are now considered, with remarks onpossible confirmation: without reference to powers(fundamental to operating frequency ratios) thebasic frequencies are now listed:

Frequency Remarks1. 1.855 Hz This is a Schuman resonance

and is also seen in RysmonicGW resonance (2 Hz).

2. 3.710 Hz This is also seen in Schuman.3. 7.42 Hz This is also seen in Schuman as

a more pronounced resonance.4. 3.710 KHz These frequencies were seen in

the coil tests (Cosmology9.275 KHz Note 3/16/96)

22 MARCH 1999


18.550 KHz Also, man of these frequencieswere see in

24.115 KHz MRA tests, especially in Mini-MRA tests.

33.390 KHz46.375 KHz Note: All the frequencies listed

here cannot be just68.635 KHz mere coincidence!77.910 KHz89.040 KHz Note: The ratios of these nos. to

3.71 are 2.5, 5,6.5, 9, 12.5,124.850 KHz 18.5, 21, 24, 35

Conclusions: These tests appear to indicate thatsub-harmonic resonances with the fundamentalrhysmonic frequency of 1.855 x 10 43 Hz do result inthe extraction of some energy from the intrinsicenergy of this Universe!

[Editor's note: There appears to be somethingfundamentally important about these frequencies.I tried to find more information about Schumanresonance but haven't found a definition as yet.]

LETTER FROM MARTIN HOLWERDA

As a response to the recent item on Inomata’s anti-gravity contribution the following: while I like to givemore general comment on his formulas on a laterdate, I like to say something about his article ingeneral. In the last equation in which he describesthe mass-loss of the gyroscope, Mr. Inomata sayshe cannot explain direction. In Europe, there arefirst signs of a movement (Crane, Monstein) thatlook at physical phenomena in hydraulic terms andthereby use Bernouilli laws. The nearest Englishlanguage equivalent being the P. Tewaricontribution. In my own gravity theory, I follow thisapproach and explain gravity as being caused byleft rotating horizontal vortices. Unlike Inomata, Isee the difference between left and right rotation asa very basic item (the heart of the matter).Reasons for this is that in my hydraulic physicalmodel, matter is asymmetrical. The macroscopicalequivalent of this is a compass-needle with histypical inclination. This because, like in matter, theaether-flow around it is not two-axle of the needlein a helix-like fashion which only harmonizes withthe earth-current when forming an angle with it.

[The above letter from Holwerda was a response toan article in NEN, vol 6, no. 6, Nov. 1998, pp 7-9.Here are some items from diverse locations thatmay be part of a common theory: The Inomata'sobservation of gravity effects. The Aspden Effect(spin up a magnetic rotor, stop, delay, spinup. Ifthe delay is short the spinup energy may be assmall as 10 percent of the initial spinup energy).Podkletnov's measurement of gravity reductionabove a spinning superconductor. Don Kelly's"gravity-drop" experiments (special array ofmagnets, energized and not energized fall atdifferent rates). All have been reported in NEN.Okay, Theorists -- put on your thinking caps.Editor.]

LETTER FROM JERRY DECKER

Subject: Cold Fusion due to cyclical patterns ofaether/zpe influx?

Just posted this to the KeelyNet discussion list andthought you might find it of interest also.

Here is an intriguing document claimingexperimental verification of the authors unified fieldtheory (dubbed FFT) and that cold fusion (and ahost of other phenomena) are directly influencedby aether/zpe influx as well as cyclical based onour movement through space. The full documentis at the following URL, the relevant excerpt isbelow that;

http://depalma.pair.com/discussions.html

"According to this theory, the basic unifiedfundamental field is concentrated in an almostlinear string, which for elementary particles scansin the surface of a cone.

Analysis of all fundamental phenomena in naturemust then be made exclusively in layered spaces.In our "laboratory" space we observe only theresult of a process, but it takes place in anotherlayer of the enveloping layered space.

In the layer where direct interactions of particlestake place there is axial symmetry in thedisposition of the force (fundamental) field, and thespherical symmetry of the field observed inlaboratory space is characteristic only of thisspace.

NEW ENERGY NEWS 23


It follows, therefore, that in the subspace wherenuclear particles interact there is an enhanced field(fundamental, and not Coulomb) barrier along thestring of the fundamental field that is greatlyreduced in the orthogonal plane.

Consequently, the encounter of interacting particlesdepends chiefly not on the relative energy of theencounter (temperature), but on the mutualorientation of the spins of the particles interactingin low-temperature nuclear fusion (CF), since theaxial symmetry noted above is related to theorientation of particle spin; artificial orientation ofthe spins of particles interacting in CF should havea substantial effect on the course of the process.

Experiments conducted by us showed that even aconstant magnetic field has a substantial effect onthe entire course of the process and on the yield ofneutrons in particular.

According to FFT a physical vacuum is not a"curved void," as generally assumed, but a realmaterial substance consisting of elementaryvacuum particles resulting from annihilationconversion of, for example, a proton and anantiproton or an electron and a positron.

In other words, proton-ant iproton andelectron-positron vacuums are a physical reality.However, elementary vacuum particles exist not inour laboratory space, but in another layer ofenveloping space, and for us, making observationsin laboratory space, they are virtual particles.

Such, according to FFT, is the real nature, and notthe formal nature, of virtual states: particles thatreally exist, not in our space, however, but in aspace complementary (in the mathematical sense)to it. Elementary vacuum particles (EVP) and othervirtual particles are states.of the microworld thatmanifest themselves indirectly in laboratory spacethrough the results of processes taking place inother spaces.

According to FFT, all observable elementaryparticles are systems consisting of "bare"elementary particles and excited vacuum particles(EVP) that form certain quark structures. Thephysical vacuum not only plays a major role inspontaneous processes of nuclear decay, as shownin detail in [4, 5], but also in nuclear

reactions. The effect of the physical vacuum onthe process of CF has not been taken into accountpreviously.

Our analysis of the effect of the physical vacuumon the course of processes in low temperaturenuclear fusion has shown that interactions of nucleiwith the physical vacuum are not predominant butthat nuclear fusion itself is a side effect and not themain one.

This, in our opinion, and only this, explains the factthat in experiments with electrodes previouslystrongly saturated with deuterium, which one wouldthink should be the best way to bring about CF, it infact does not generally take place. We explain thisas follows.

Deep saturation of the electrodes with deuteriumprevents development of reactions involving thephysical vacuum. It is understandable that, havingsuppressed the main process, interaction with thephysical vacuum, we also suppress the side effect(fusion of nuclei) to an even greater degree.

From studies of fundamental field theory andcorrelated work with this theory it is known that thesolar system moves relative to the physical vacuumwith an extremely high velocity of hundreds ofkilometers per second.

Therefore all processes involving the physicalvacuum have daily, yearly, and secular temporalvariations. Consequently, a sufficient directcorroboration of the theoretical conclusion that thephysical vacuum plays a major role in processes ofCF would be experimental detection of temporalvariations in the process.The authors have data on experiments in CFcollected over 18 months. In all the experimentswe, like many other researchers, have observedspontaneous jumps in the yield of neutrons overseveral seconds. These intermittent processes, inour opinion, are entirely governed by. sporadicgrowth in the intensity of processes involving thephysical vacuum.

This theoretical conclusion was corroboratedexperimentally by the fact that these jumps inneutron emissions (by one to two orders ofmagnitude) occur predominantly at a particulartime of day.

24 MARCH 1999


Meetings

According to our observations, statistically reliabledata indicate that the greatest probability ofappearance of spontaneous jumps in the number ofneutrons emitted takes place at the following timesin local time: 10:20 to 10:30 a.m., 11:40 to 11:50a.m., and 12:10 to 12:20.p.m. At another time ofthe day the probability of these processesappearing is substantially lower.

Since, according to our ideas, the processgenerally called cold fusion is in fact a process ofinteraction of nuclei with the physical vacuum andis only accompanied by a minor process of nuclearfusion, then the energy characteristics of theprocess cannot be entirely determined by nuclearfusion.

In order to check this theoretical conclusionexperimentally we tested and confirmed byexperiment the following consequences:

a) The process of neutron emission in anexperiment takes place even if distilled water isused as the electrolyte and the electrodes are notsaturated with deuterium;

b) the energy characteristics of the processdepend on the manner and magnitude oforientation of nuclei both in the electrode materialand in the electrolyte."

Jerry Wayne Decker / [email protected]://keelynet.com

RUSSIAN SCIENCE SERVER

As to the goals and objectives: our server isindependent (without government support) andnon-profit. One of the goals is to use Internetabilities to exhibit Russian discoveries, which mightbe useful for world economy.

We start with the “Heat-EMR” project for the reasonthat we own the intellectual rights for the project.This project is a result of the several years’research of the Russian scientists and it hasreached a level of the preliminary working sampledemonstrating that the principal idea is workable.

We understand that this project has meaning forthe world economy but it needs the serious

international financial and intellectual efforts to berealized.

We have just a theoretical concept at the presenttime, and in order to achieve the technological levelthe idea has to be given further researchdevelopment.

We would like to receive more detailed informationabout program of charge clusters , because itseems to us that charge clusters is one of thepossible applications of “Heat-EMR” project.

Please be informed that we have put the link toyour server. We have steadied the Internet serversand consider your server the best informational unitdevoted to new energy.

The additional informational about “Heat-EMR”project could be receivedat URL http://www.ideas.ru/HEMR/

Sincerely yours.Sergey Utkin.

[email protected]

[From: http://www.sae.org/CALENDAR/iec99cfp.htm]

34th IECECIntersociety Energy Conversion

Engineering ConferenceAugust 1-5, 1999

Hotel VancouverVancouver, British Columbia, Canada

"Engineering an International Energy Strategy"

This conference provides a forum to present anddiscuss engineering aspects of energy conversion,advanced energy conversion systems and devices,energy utilization and efficiency, environmentalissues, and policy impacts on the research,development and implementation of

NEW ENERGY NEWS 25


Commercial ColumnCommercial Column

energy systems. Papers dealing with allengineering aspects of the general topical areasbelow are welcome.

General Chair: Dr. Jerry BeamAir Force Research LaboratoryPh: 937/255-6226 Fax: 937/476-4781Email: [email protected]

Program Chair: Michael G. SchneiderSundstrand CorporationPh: 815/394-4952 Fax: 815/394-3897Email: [email protected]

Sponsors:Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) - 1999Conference Administrator; American Institute ofAeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); AmericanSociety of Mechanical Engineers (ASME);American Nuclear Society (ANS); AmericanInstitute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE); Institute ofElectrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

INSTITUTE OFNUCLEAR MATERIALS MANAGEMENT

40th Annual Meeting, July 25-29, 1999The Pointe Hilton at Squaw Peak, Phoenix, Arizona

The 40th Annual Meeting will provide attendeeswith professional forum for the exchange of thelatest technical information in nuclear materialsmanagement. The meeting will address all aspectsof nuclear materials management.

How to Present a Paper at the 1999 AnnualMeeting

Additional INMM and 1999 Annual Meetinginformation may be found on the INMM Web site athttp://www.inmm.org

Questions regarding preparation of abstracts,papers. posters, and oral presentations may bedirected to:Charles Pietri, Chair.Technical Program Committee(708) 246-8489; Fax (708) 246-8489email: [email protected]

He can also be reached at INMM Headquarters at(847) 480-9573; Fax; (847) 480-9282

7th Russian Conference on Cold NuclearTransmutation (RCCNT-7)May 23-30, 1999Olimpiyskiy Hotel, Dagomys(near the famous Black Sea resort town of Sochi)

Programming includes:1. Experimental researches of Cold Fusion andNuclear Transmutation;2. Cold Fusion and Nuclear Transmutationtheoretical models;3. Cold Fusion applied technologies and devices.

Registration fee: $900 covers conf. Proceedingsand program, transportation to and from Sochiairport, hotel, all meals, organizing fee.

Contact Yury N. Bazhutov, P.O. Box 169, “Erzion”Center, 105077 Moscow, Russia.Phone (095) 464-78-81, (095) 946-15-51Fax (095) 131-89-65<[email protected]>

The following companies (listed alphabetically) arecommercializing cold fusion or other enhancedenergy devices: [Listings with your additional copy,or boxed, for small annual service fee.]

COMPANY: PRODUCT

American Pure Fusion Engineering and Supply:Warren Cooley, 1-800-789-7109 or 503-585-6746.Email to: [email protected]

Clustron Sciences Corp.: Contact: Ron Brightsen,703-845-8531.

26 MARCH 1999


ENECO: is in the business of commercializing theexciting new field of low energy induced nuclearreactions in solids via patent licensing, joint-ventures, and co-operative research. ENECO,University of Utah Research Park, 391-B ChipetaWay, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 USA. ContactFred Jaeger, Voice 801-583-2000, Fax 801-583-6245. Email: [email protected]

Fusion Information Center (FIC): Research anddevelopment of new energy systems. The world'smost complete resource depository for cold fusionresearch information, as well as other new energyresearch including zero-point energy; space energyresearch; electronic, electromagnetic, andmechanical over unity devices and transmutation.We are the publishers for New Energy News , and theJournal of New Energy. Voice 801-466-8680, Fax801-466-8668. Contact Hal Fox.

Trenergy, Inc., has acquired rights to develop andproduce a new-type of thermal power based on thecontrolled production of clean nuclear reactionsfrom plasma injected transmutation. Contact at3084 East 3300 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84109,Voice 801-466-8680, Fax 801-466-8668.

E-Quest Sciences: Contact Russ George,FAX 415-851-8489.

German Association for Vacuum Field Energy : DVS-Secretariat, Feyermuehler Str. 12, D-53894Merchernich, Germany. Tel: 011-49/(0)2443-8246 Fax:011-49/(0) 2443-901880 E-mail: [email protected]: www.gptec.com/dvs.

Holotec AG : Clean Energy Technology, contact AndréWaser, Gen. Mgr., Bireggstrasse 14, CH-6003, Luzern,Switzerland. Phone 011 41-41 360 4485, or Fax 011 41-41 360 4486.

Hydro Dynamics, Inc.: Rome, Georgia. Contact JamesGriggs, Voice 706-234-4111 Fax 706-234-0702.

JET Energy Technology, Inc. : Energy Production andUtilization and Control. Weston, MA. Contact Dr.Mitchell Swartz, Voice 617-237-3625. Fax 617-237-3625.http://world.std.com/~mica/jet.html

Labofex, Experimental and Applied Plasma Physics :Ontario, Canada. Contact Dr. Paulo N. Correa. Tel 905-660-1040Fax 905-738-8427

Magnetic Power Inc. : Sebastopol, CA. Contact MarkGoldes, voice 707-829-9391, Fax 707-829-1002.

Nova Resources Group, Inc.: Denver, CO. Call ChipRansford, Phone 303-433-5582.

UV Enhanced Ultrasound: Hong Kong.FAX 852-2338-3057.

"YUSMAR"- Scientific-Commercial Company:President: Dr. Yuri S. Potapov, 277012 Kishinev,Moldova. Phone and Fax 011-3732-233318.

Zenergy Corp.: Founded in 1996 to facilitate theintroduction of commercially viable energy alternatives.390 South Robins Way, Chandler, AZ 85225. ContactReed Huish, 602-814-7865, Fax 602-821-0967, e-mail:[email protected]

Note: The Fusion Information Center has been actingas an information source to many of these companies.We expect to augment our international service toprovide contacts, information, and businessopportunities to companies considering an entry into theenhanced energy market.

INFORMATION SOURCES

Academy for New Energy (ANE) 216 Commerce Drive,Ste. 4, Fort Collins, CO 80524. Tel. 970-482-3731

ANE Newsletter, quarterly publication of ANE,edited by Robert Emmerich.

Advanced Energy Network Newsletter, quarterly.Advanced Energy Network, P.O. Box 691, Rondebosch7700 Capetown, Rep. South Africa.

Antigravity News and Space Drive Technology,bimonthly newsletter, pub. J.E.Cox Enterprise, P.O. Box655, Marietta, GA 30061-655 (Phone 770-218-9693).Per year $36. U.S., $48 foreign.

Cold Fusion Times, quarterly newsletter published byDr. Mitchell Swartz, P.O. Box 81135, Wellesley Hills MA02181. Web-site: http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html

Cycles, a R&D newsletter, published by DieterSoegemeier, Editor, GPO Box 269, Brisbane, QLD.4001, Australia. Phone/Fax: +61 (0)7 3809 3257.

Electric Spacecraft Journal, quarterly, edited by CharlesA. Yost, 73 Sunlight Drive, Leicester, NC 28748.

Electrifying Times, 3/year magazine. 63600 DeschutesMarket Rd, Bend, OR 97701541-388-1908, Fax 541-388-2750,E-mail <[email protected]>www.teleport.com/~etimes/

NEW ENERGY NEWS 27


Institute for New Energy (INE), organization topromote and help find funding for new energyresearch.Visit our Home Page: www.padrak.com/ine/ whichcontains many important scientific papers andcurrent reports on all areas of research.E-mail: [email protected]

or [email protected] 801-466-8680, Fax 801-466-8668.

New Energy News monthly newsletter forINE, highlighting the research anddevelopment in the worldwide new energyarena. Edited by Hal Fox.

3084 E. 3300 South, Salt Lake City, UT. 84109

Elemental Energy , monthly newsletter, edited by Wayne

Green, 70 Route 202N, Petersborough, NH 03458.Email: <[email protected]>

Foundations of Science, free newsletter pub. 4-6/yr., ed.David L. Bergman. Common Sense Science, Inc., P.O.Box 1013, Kennesaw, GA 30144-8013. 770-565-5504

< D b e r g m a n @ C o m p u S e r v e . c o m >www.cormedia.com/css

Fusion Facts has become a section in the Journal ofNew Energy.

Fusion Technology, Journal of the American NuclearSociety, edited by Dr. George Miley, 555 N. KensingtonAve., La Grange Park, IL 60525.

Future Technology Intelligence Report (FTIR), monthlynewsletter, making available technological informationnow omitted from establishment media. Back issuesavailable at substantially lower cost on the InterNet at<www.tarapublishing.com> FTIR, P.O. Box 2903,Sacramento, CA 95812. <[email protected]>

Infinite Energy, bi-monthly magazine. P.O. Box 2816,Concord, NH 03302-2816. Voice: 603-228-4516. Fax:603-224-5975E-mail [email protected]

A.Keith Brewer International Science Library , a non-profit organization having a Tesla collection; new energybooks, publications and videos; one of the GermanAssociation of Vacuum Field Energy archives. 325 N.Central Ave., Richland Center, WI 53581; Phone:608-647-6513; FAX: 608-647-6797; e-mai l :drbrewer@mwt/net; web site: www.mwt.net/~drbrewer.

KeelyNet BBS - Jerry Decker, 214-324-3501Internet: www.keelynet.comE-mail: [email protected]

Planetary Association for Clean Energy Newsletter,quarterly, edited by Dr. Andrew Michrowski. 100Bronson Ave, # 1001, Ottawa, Ontario K1R 6G8,Canada. Web page: http://energie.keng.de/~pace

Positive News and Living Lightly, quarterly, edited by S.Crockett-Burrows. The Six Bells, Bishops Castle,Shropshire SY9 5AA UK. Tel: (01588) 630-121 / 122

Space Energy Journal, quarterly, edited by Jim Kettner& Don Kelly, P.O. Box 1136, Clearwater, FL 34617-1136.

The above list of commercial and information sourceswill be growing. New listings will be added asinformation is received. Send information to NEN,3084 E. 3300 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84158.

CONTENTS FOR FEBRUARY 1999

1st CONF. ON FREE ENERGY . . . . . . . . . . . . 1BLACKLIGHT POWER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1EDITORIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2FUSION BRIEFINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Report on RCCNT-6Neutron YieldDeuteron Absorption in Titanium

RAD WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Race to Clean up WasteNevada says NoHanford Project finds ListenersMore on Yucca MountainSenator Ignoring Public Opinion

MISCELLANEOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82nd Int. Japanese SymposiumNew Energy - where is it?Voice Recognition softwareGlobal Warming & New Energy

NEW ENERGY NEWS3084 East 3300 SouthSalt Lake City, UT 84109-2154

Making Ion ThreadsLow Oil Prices -- US loses?Hubble finds more GalaxiesBiological FusionJerry Decker on EnergyNASA Pledges for Antigravity ResearchSolar Vibration VehicleSpinning SuperconductorSmith Coil

OTHER PUBLICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16Infinite EnergyPACESpace Energy JournalFTIR21 st Century Science & Technlolgye-FFICIENCY News

BOOK REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19Cold Fusion :Secret Energy Revolution

LETTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19MEETINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24COMMERCIAL COLUMN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

submissions information at INE, 3084 E. 3300 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84109. Phone 801-466-8680 Fax 801-466-8668

BLACKLIGHTâ„¢ POWER, INC. - New Energy Times

Documents

Transcript of BLACKLIGHTâ„¢ POWER, INC. - New Energy Times