Bisnode analysis_World Cup2014

THE VIEW FROM ANOTHER CORNER

OFFICIAL INDICATORS

BISNODE INDICATORS

NATIONAL LEAGUES STRENGHT

PLAYERS’ EXPERIENCE

GDP PER CAPITA

POPULATION

CLIMATE CONDITIONS

PLAYERS’ CLIMATEADAPTATION

FIFA

TRANSFERMARKT

World Cup Brasil 2014

Belgium 11.Greece 12.England 13.USA 14.Chile 15.Croatia 16.Côte D’Ivoire 17.Bosnia-Herzegovina 19.France 20.Mexico 21.Russia 22.Ecuador 23.Ghana 24.Algeria 26.Costarica 31.Iran 34.Nigeria 41.Honduras 42.Japan 48.Cameroon 50.Republic of Korea 53.Australia 56.

Spain 1.Germany 2.Argentina 3.Colombia 4.Portugal 5.Uruguay 6.Italy 7.Switzerland 8.Nethrlands 9.Brazil 10.

FIFA rang list

64,1%

35,9%

National Teams value according to Transfermarkt (millions euro)

3. Brazil 467,5

5. Italy 409,0

25,03

17. Chile 148,5

18. Cameroon129,0

20. Ghana102,75

6. France 388,75

12. Uruguay218,5

8. Portugal 321,75

15. Switzerland 178,0

21. Japan98,0

23. Mexico96,0

22. Nigeria96,5

9. Belgium 309,5 16. Côte D’Ivoire160,75

2. Germany 616,0

7. England 334,0

10. Colombia 270,25

11. Netherlands 226,0

4. Argentina 461,0

1. Spain 751,0

14. Russia 184,0

24. Greece91,0

25. Ecuador91,0

31. Australia 28,0

26. USA66,5

13. Croatia 212,25

32. Honduras 21,25

30. Iran 28,5

28. Republic of Korea 52,25

29. Costarica 35,25

27. Algeria 62,75

19. Bosnia- Herzegovina

116,75

The average value of a Spain’s National Team player (EUR 25.3 milion), is higher than the value of the whole Honduras National Team (EUR 21.25 million).

According to Transfermarkt, the most valuable team of the World Soccer Championship is Spain with 751 million EUR. Germany follows with 616 million EUR. Brazil is the third, with the National Team value of EUR 467.5 million. Regarding the population, the most valuable National Teams of the World Championship are Uruguay, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. More specifically, the Uruguay National Team is worth EUR 218.5, considering that Uruguay has only 3.3 million inhabitants.

Côt

e D

’Ivoi

re

Nig

eria

Hon

dura

s

Bos

nia-

Her

zeg.

Col

ombi

a

Bra

zil

Mex

ico

Rus

sia

Arg

entin

a

Gre

ece

Italy

R. o

f Kor

ea

Japa

n

Eng

land

Net

herla

nds

Sw

itzer

land

US

A

Aus

tral

ia

Ger

man

y

Bel

gium

Fran

ce

Spa

in

Por

tuga

l

Chi

le

Hrv

atsk

a

Uru

guay

Cos

taric

a

Iran

Ecu

ador

Alg

eria

Gha

na

Cam

eroo

n

1,85billioninhabitants of the Earth shall be part of this year’s Soccer Mania

Average GDP of participating countries is

The difference between the most populated country participating in the World Championship (USA) and the participating country with the smallest population (Uruguay) is an incredible 96.4 times.

GDP per capita

$ 22.59062,5% of participating countries are below average

The no. of inhabitants of the countries participating in the World Championship ( the number of inhabitants in millions)

2. Brazil 201,0

10. Italy 59,9

21. Chile 17,8

19. Cameroon17. Ghana

6. France 66,6

32. Uruguay

3,3

22,524,2

22,4

26. Portugal

28. Švicarska

8,0

5. Japan 126,76. Mexico 118,4

3. Nigerija 174,5

24. Belgium

11,1

20. Côte D’Ivoire

7. Germany 80,311. England

53,0

13. Colombia 47,7

22. Nizozemska

16,8

15. Argentina 41,7

14. Spain 46,7

4. Russia 143,7

25. Greece

23. Ecuador

18. Australia

1. USA 318,1

North America

South America

AfricaAsia

Europe

436,5

339,6

282,3 254.1

376,2

30. Croatia

27. Honduras 8,3

4,6

15,2

8. Iran 77,2

12. Republic of Korea

50,2

29. Costarica

16. Algeria 38,7

31. Bosnia-Herzegovina3,94,3

10,8

10,5

23,5

If we look at the GDP per capita of the countries participating in the World Championship, USA is again at the top. Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Ghana and Nigeria are at the bottom. With respect to significant differences in the participating countries’ GDP per capita, the average GDP is 22.590.

GERMANYCROATIA

USA 5598 km

Croatia 5523 km

Cameroon 4697 km

Uruguay 4692 km

Portugal 4537 km

Brazil 3684 km

Switzerland 3665 km

France 3512 km

Bosnia-Herzegovina 3490 km

Honduras 3280 km

England 3179

Netherlands 3155 km

Italy 3086 km

Nigeria 2981 kmCôte D’Ivoire 2971 km

Japan 2777 kmR. of Korea 2531 km km

Costarica 2268 kmGreece 2266 km

Russia 2250 km

Australia 2225 km

Chile 1932 km

Algeria 1887 km

Spain 1884 km

Iran 1784 km

Ecuador 1756 km

Ghana 1749 km

Argentina 1680 km

Germ

any 1657 km

Colom

bia 1497 km

Mexico 1064 km

Belgium

696 km

Travelling distance of National Teams for games, per Group

Is the average distance that will pass each national team during first gruop phase of competition

During the first round of the World Championship, the National Teams will travel

USA will travel the most, 5598 kilometres, while Belgium will travel the least, only 696 km. The second-longest travelling distance will be covered by Croatia, who will travel for 5523 kilometres.

2.811 km

Manaus

Cuiaba

Brasilia

Sao Paulo

Salvador

Recife

Natal

Fortaleza

Belo Horizonte

Rio de Janeiro

Cuturiba

Porto Alegre

B RA

ZI

L

89.953 kilometres distance

Brazil is 97 times larger than Croatia and almost 24 times larger than Germany. During the first round, Croatia will travel the distance equivalent to 26 journeys between Zagreb and Osijek.

BRAZIL0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CR

OATIA

MEXICO

CA

MER

OON

SPAIN0

5

10

15

20

25

30

NETH

ERLANDSCHILE

AU

STR

ALIA

Brazil Croatia Mexico Cameroon

Value of the team 3 13 23 18

Fifa rang list 3 16 20 30

No. of inhabitants 2 30 6 19

GDP per capita 22 17 20 31

Comparasion of countries in each group by four indicators

A

Value of the team

RANK

Fifa rang list

Number of inhabitants

GDP per capita

05

10

15

20

25

30

A great difference may be observed between Brazil and Mexico on one hand, and Cameroon and Croatia on the other, with respect to the number of their inhabitants. Also, we can clearly see in this Graph that Brazil is the Group’s favourite, while Croatia and Mexico are the most probable runner-up candidates in the Group. Bisnode analysis gives an advantage to Croatia.

Brazil dominant

Sport brand

Spain Netherlands Chile Australia





BAll participants of this Group are in the higher half of the GDP per capita. The leading team is certainly Spain, while the Netherlands follow it very closely.

The richest Group on the Mondial, in GDP per capita

Sport brand


COLOMBIA0

5

10

15

20

25

30

GR

EECE

CÔTE D’IVOIR

E

JAPA

N

Colombia Greece C. D’Ivoire Japan





Uruguay Costarica England Italy

Vrijednost momčadi 12 29 7 5

FIFA rang lista 6 25 13 7

Broj stanovnika 32 29 11 10

BDP per capita 19 21 6 12

URUGUAY

CO

STARICA

ENGLAND

ITAL

Y

C DThe most valuable team of this Group is Columbia, while Japan is the richest and the most highly populated country. The proof that such factors are not of utmost importance in soccer is Ivory Coast, the poorest of all countries in the Championship, which will, as the second team in its Group, pass to the second round in the Championship.

Costa Rica is certainly an outsider in this Group, everyone else counting on earning points with it readily. However, it is questionable how games between Italy, England and Uruguay will end. Bisnode analysis gives a slight advantage to European National Teams. More so because the biggest star of Uruguay, Suarez, has been injured.

The Ivory Coast is the poorest country on the Championship passing into the second round

Uruguay between the two giants

Sport brand Nacionalni dres, proizvođač

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Argentina Bosnia-Her. Iran Nigeria





Switzerland Ecuador France Honduras





ARGENTINA

BO

SN

IA-H

ERZEGOVINAIRAN

NIG

ERIA


ESurely one of the easiest Groups, where it is clear that Honduras and Ecuador – by no indicator – have much of a chance for the second round.

A gap between the rich and the poor

Sport brand

FArgentina is the doubtless favourite of this Group. However, the things get complicated for the second place. The Bisnode analysis gives a slight advantage to our neighbours - Bosnia and Herzegovina with respect to Nigeria. Iran may spoil the odds in this group, although the changes of its passing into the second round are minimum.

Argentina and Bosnia and Herzegovina continue the championship

Sport brand

SWITZERLAND

ECU

ADOR

FRANCE

HO

ND

URAS

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Value of the team

RANK

Fifa rang list


GDP per capita

05

10

15

20

25

30

GERMANY

PO

RTUGAL

GHANA

USA

BELGIUM

ALG

ERIA

RUSSIA

RE

PU

BLI

C O

F KOREA

Germany Portugal Ghana USA





Belgium Algeria Russia R. of Korea





GIn spite of the fact that USA GDP per capita and its number of inhabitants is the highest, the two European National teams (Germany and Portugal) will go further in the championship. Ghana is a hidden peril for all of this Group’s teams, as it can surprise and make he fight for the second place significantly more complicated

Clash between rich and poor

Sport brand


HAccording to the Bisnode analysis, Belgium shall pass to the second round (as the first in the Group) as well as Russia, Algeria and Southern Korea, who are all the weakest national teams in this year’s World Championship.

Belgium is the Group’s favourite

Sport brand

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Value of the team

RANK

Fifa rang list


GDP per capita

05

10

15

20

25

30

Sport brand analysis

Three largest world sports equipment manufacturers are dominant - Nike, Puma and Adidas, who equip 84% of the Championship, i.e. 27 National Teams.

Adidas and Nike will meet in the finals. >

109832

1 1 1 1 1

1. Spain Spain 1.

2. England Brazil 2.

3. Germany Germany 3.

4. Belgium Argentina 4.

5. France Belgium 5.

6. Italy Italy 6.

7. Argentina England 7.

8. Brazil Portugal 8.

9. Portugal France 9.

10. Switzerland Colombia 10.

11. Algeria Uruguay 11.

12. Uruguay Switzerland 12.

13. Croatia Netherlands 13.

14. Cameroon Croatia 14.

15. C. D’Ivoire Chile 15.

16. Chile C. D’Ivoire 16.

17. Colombia Bosnia -Herz. 17.

18. Japan Russia 18.

19. Bosnia-Herz. Algeria 19.

20. Netherlands Ghana 20.

21. R. of Korea Cameroon 21.

22. Nigeria Greece 22.

23. Ghana Mexico 23.

24. Greece Japan 24.

25. USA Nigeria 25.

26. Mexico USA 26.

27. Australia Ecuador 27.

28. Honduras R. of Korea 28.

29. Russia Iran 29.

30. Iran Costarica 30.

31. Ecuador Australia 31.

32. Costarica Honduras 32.

Bisnode rank list

Brazil Spain Colombia Italy France Argentina Germany Belgium

Croatia Netherland Cote D’Ivoire England Switzerland Bosnia-Herz. Portugal Russia

Cameroon Chile Greece Uruguay Ecuador Nigeria Ghana Algeria

Mexico Australia Japan Costarica Honduras Iran USA R. of Korea

A B C D E F G H

Germ

any

Germ

any

Russia

Spai

n

Spai

n

Spain

Croa

tia

Italy

Italy

England

Bosnia-Herz.

GermanyBra

zil

Colombia France

France

Net

herla

nds

England

Braz

il

Bra

zil

Brazil

Spain

Cote D’IvoireArgentina

Argentina

Argentina

Switzerland

Belgium

Portugal

Portugal

Based on the Bisnode Ranking List, a scenario of this year’s World Championship in Brazil has been created

Bisnode calculation of the National Team Values The National Team ranking list, based on the National League strength where the National Team players play. The leading world’s Leagues are Spain, England, Germany, Italy, Portugal, France and Russia, according to the official FIFA ranking list of the National Leagues. As most Spain’s national team players play in their home League, which is at the same time the strongest, Spain is according to this criterion the leading Team. Although the Croatian League is weak, since most of our National Team players play in strong foreign leagues, Croatian National Team is in the upper part and takes the 13th place.

Bisnode rang lista svjetskog prvenstvaCombined calculation: the strengths of the National Teams to the strengths of the National Leagues where the National Team players play, the FIFA ranking list of the national team players’ value according to Transfermarkt, the travelling distance of the National Teams in the first round and numerous other analytic parameters have been used in the Ultimate World Bisnode Ranking List of the National Soccer Teams.

1/8 1/4 1/2 finals

In final wins Adidas.

www.bisnode.hr

facebook.com/BisnodeHrvatska

Bisnode analysis_World Cup2014

Documents

Transcript of Bisnode analysis_World Cup2014