Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

45

Transcript of Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 1: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models1

Ivailo Hartarsky

CEREMADE, Universit�e Paris Dauphine, PSL University

22 October 2021

Rencontres de Probabilit�es, Rouen

1Supported by ERC Starting Grant 680275 MALIGIvailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 2: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

L(f )(η) =∑x∈Z

1ηx−1=•(πx(f )(η)− f (η)).

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 3: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 4: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 5: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 6: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 7: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 8: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 9: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 10: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 11: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 12: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 13: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 14: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 15: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 16: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 17: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 18: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 19: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

East

{◦, •}Z state space.

q ∈ [0, 1] equilibrium density of •. (Think of q small.)

Ber(q)⊗Z is a reversible measure.

East model (J�ackle�Eisinger'91)

The state of each site x ∈ Z is resampled independently at rate 1 from

Ber(q). However, the update is rejected unless x − 1 is in state •.

Theorem

(Aldous�Diaconis'02,Cancrini�Martinelli�Roberto�Toninelli'08)

Trel 6 exp(C log2(1/q)

)

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 20: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

Lemma (Two-block Poincar�e inequality of CMRT)

Let X1 and X2 be two independent RV valued in the �nite sets X1,X2.

Let H ⊂ X1 with p := P(X1 ∈ H) > 0. Then for any f : X1,X2 → R

Var(f ) 61

1−√1− p

E[Var(f |X2) + 1X1∈H Var(f |X1)]

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 21: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

Lemma (Two-block Poincar�e inequality of CMRT)

Let X1 and X2 be two independent RV valued in the �nite sets X1,X2.

Let H ⊂ X1 with p := P(X1 ∈ H) > 0. Then for any f : X1,X2 → R

Var(f ) 61

1−√1− p

E[Var(f |X2) + 1X1∈H Var(f |X1)]

Idea: e−1/Trel = limt→∞(dTV(µt , π))1/t .

Probabilistic proof

Two chains couple as soon as we update X1 so that H occurs and then

X2. There are bN/2c attempted updates at X2 preceded by an update

at X1, where N ∼ P(t). Each succeeds with probability p, so

dTV(µt , π) 6 P(not coupled at time t) 6 E[(1− p)bN/2c

]≈ E

[(√1− p

)N]= exp

(−t(1−

√1− p

)).

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 22: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

Lemma (Two-block Poincar�e inequality of CMRT)

Let X1 and X2 be two independent RV valued in the �nite sets X1,X2.

Let H ⊂ X1 with p := P(X1 ∈ H) > 0. Then for any f : X1,X2 → R

Var(f ) 61

1−√1− p

E[Var(f |X2) + 1X1∈H Var(f |X1)]

X1 X2

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 23: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

Lemma (Two-block Poincar�e inequality of CMRT)

Let X1 and X2 be two independent RV valued in the �nite sets X1,X2.

Let H ⊂ X1 with p := P(X1 ∈ H) > 0. Then for any f : X1,X2 → R

Var(f ) 61

1−√1− p

E[Var(f |X2) + 1X1∈H Var(f |X1)]

HX1 X2

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 24: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

Lemma (Two-block Poincar�e inequality of CMRT)

Let X1 and X2 be two independent RV valued in the �nite sets X1,X2.

Let H ⊂ X1 with p := P(X1 ∈ H) > 0. Then for any f : X1,X2 → R

Var(f ) 61

1−√1− p

E[Var(f |X2) + 1X1∈H Var(f |X1)]

X1 X2

1

1−√1− p

{2/ε if p = ε� 1,

1+√ε if 1− p = ε� 1.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 25: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

ModelIdea

Lemma (Two-block Poincar�e inequality of CMRT)

Let X1 and X2 be two independent RV valued in the �nite sets X1,X2.

Let H ⊂ X1 with p := P(X1 ∈ H) > 0. Then for any f : X1,X2 → R

Var(f ) 61

1−√1− p

E[Var(f |X2) + 1X1∈H Var(f |X1)]

X1 X2

1

1−√1− p

{2/ε if p = ε� 1,

1+√ε if 1− p = ε� 1.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 26: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

General KCM

Volume L ⊂ Z��nite or in�nite;

for each x ∈ L a �nite probability space (Sx , πx), an infection

event •x ⊂ Sx ;uniform bound infx∈L πx(•x) > q > 0 on the infection probability;

boundary condition ω;

for each x ∈ L a �nite family Ux of �nite subsets of Z \ {x}uniform bound supx∈L,U∈Ux ,y∈U |x − y | 6 R <∞ on the range;

an irreducible component C ⊂∏

x∈L Sx of the dynamics.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 27: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

General KCM

Volume L ⊂ Z��nite or in�nite;

for each x ∈ L a �nite probability space (Sx , πx), an infection

event •x ⊂ Sx ;

uniform bound infx∈L πx(•x) > q > 0 on the infection probability;

boundary condition ω;

for each x ∈ L a �nite family Ux of �nite subsets of Z \ {x}uniform bound supx∈L,U∈Ux ,y∈U |x − y | 6 R <∞ on the range;

an irreducible component C ⊂∏

x∈L Sx of the dynamics.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 28: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

General KCM

Volume L ⊂ Z��nite or in�nite;

for each x ∈ L a �nite probability space (Sx , πx), an infection

event •x ⊂ Sx ;uniform bound infx∈L πx(•x) > q > 0 on the infection probability;

boundary condition ω;

for each x ∈ L a �nite family Ux of �nite subsets of Z \ {x}uniform bound supx∈L,U∈Ux ,y∈U |x − y | 6 R <∞ on the range;

an irreducible component C ⊂∏

x∈L Sx of the dynamics.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 29: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

General KCM

Volume L ⊂ Z��nite or in�nite;

for each x ∈ L a �nite probability space (Sx , πx), an infection

event •x ⊂ Sx ;uniform bound infx∈L πx(•x) > q > 0 on the infection probability;

boundary condition ω;

for each x ∈ L a �nite family Ux of �nite subsets of Z \ {x}uniform bound supx∈L,U∈Ux ,y∈U |x − y | 6 R <∞ on the range;

an irreducible component C ⊂∏

x∈L Sx of the dynamics.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 30: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

General KCM

Volume L ⊂ Z��nite or in�nite;

for each x ∈ L a �nite probability space (Sx , πx), an infection

event •x ⊂ Sx ;uniform bound infx∈L πx(•x) > q > 0 on the infection probability;

boundary condition ω;

for each x ∈ L a �nite family Ux of �nite subsets of Z \ {x}

uniform bound supx∈L,U∈Ux ,y∈U |x − y | 6 R <∞ on the range;

an irreducible component C ⊂∏

x∈L Sx of the dynamics.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 31: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

General KCM

Volume L ⊂ Z��nite or in�nite;

for each x ∈ L a �nite probability space (Sx , πx), an infection

event •x ⊂ Sx ;uniform bound infx∈L πx(•x) > q > 0 on the infection probability;

boundary condition ω;

for each x ∈ L a �nite family Ux of �nite subsets of Z \ {x}

L(f )(η) =∑x∈L

1∃U∈Ux ,∀y∈U,(η·ω)y∈•y (πx(f )(η)− f (η));

uniform bound supx∈L,U∈Ux ,y∈U |x − y | 6 R <∞ on the range;

an irreducible component C ⊂∏

x∈L Sx of the dynamics.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 32: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

General KCM

Volume L ⊂ Z��nite or in�nite;

for each x ∈ L a �nite probability space (Sx , πx), an infection

event •x ⊂ Sx ;uniform bound infx∈L πx(•x) > q > 0 on the infection probability;

boundary condition ω;

for each x ∈ L a �nite family Ux of �nite subsets of Z \ {x}

L(f )(η) =∑x∈L

1∃U∈Ux ,∀y∈U,(η·ω)y∈•y (πx(f )(η)− f (η));

uniform bound supx∈L,U∈Ux ,y∈U |x − y | 6 R <∞ on the range;

an irreducible component C ⊂∏

x∈L Sx of the dynamics.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 33: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

General KCM

Volume L ⊂ Z��nite or in�nite;

for each x ∈ L a �nite probability space (Sx , πx), an infection

event •x ⊂ Sx ;uniform bound infx∈L πx(•x) > q > 0 on the infection probability;

boundary condition ω;

for each x ∈ L a �nite family Ux of �nite subsets of Z \ {x}

L(f )(η) =∑x∈L

1∃U∈Ux ,∀y∈U,(η·ω)y∈•y (πx(f )(η)− f (η));

uniform bound supx∈L,U∈Ux ,y∈U |x − y | 6 R <∞ on the range;

an irreducible component C ⊂∏

x∈L Sx of the dynamics.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 34: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

Result

Theorem

There exists CR > 0 such that

Trel 6 (2/q)CR log(min(2/q,|L|)).

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 35: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

Result

Theorem

There exists CR > 0 such that

Trel 6 (2/q)CR log(min(2/q,|L|)).

We focus on proving

Trel 6 (2/q)CR log |L|.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 36: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

Lemma (Two-block dynamics)

Update L1 at rate 1 conditionally on the irreducible component induced

by ηL2\L1 and similarly for L2. The relaxation time of this chain is at

most (2/q)CR .

L1 L2

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 37: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

Lemma (Two-block dynamics)

Update L1 at rate 1 conditionally on the irreducible component induced

by ηL2\L1 and similarly for L2. The relaxation time of this chain is at

most (2/q)CR .

L1 L2

Couple two copies of the chain, by asking to get the most • possiblenext to the middle in R consecutive alternating updates.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 38: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

Lemma (Two-block dynamics)

Update L1 at rate 1 conditionally on the irreducible component induced

by ηL2\L1 and similarly for L2. The relaxation time of this chain is at

most (2/q)CR .

L1 L2

Couple two copies of the chain, by asking to get the most • possiblenext to the middle in R consecutive alternating updates.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 39: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

Lemma (Two-block dynamics)

Update L1 at rate 1 conditionally on the irreducible component induced

by ηL2\L1 and similarly for L2. The relaxation time of this chain is at

most (2/q)CR .

L1 L2

Couple two copies of the chain, by asking to get the most • possiblenext to the middle in R consecutive alternating updates.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 40: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

Lemma (Two-block dynamics)

Update L1 at rate 1 conditionally on the irreducible component induced

by ηL2\L1 and similarly for L2. The relaxation time of this chain is at

most (2/q)CR .

L1 L2

Couple two copies of the chain, by asking to get the most • possiblenext to the middle in R consecutive alternating updates.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 41: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

Lemma (Two-block dynamics)

Update L1 at rate 1 conditionally on the irreducible component induced

by ηL2\L1 and similarly for L2. The relaxation time of this chain is at

most (2/q)CR .

L1 L2

Couple two copies of the chain, by asking to get the most • possiblenext to the middle in R consecutive alternating updates.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 42: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

Lemma (Two-block dynamics)

Update L1 at rate 1 conditionally on the irreducible component induced

by ηL2\L1 and similarly for L2. The relaxation time of this chain is at

most (2/q)CR .

L1 L2

Couple two copies of the chain, by asking to get the most • possiblenext to the middle in R consecutive alternating updates.

Couple the parts when they have identical boundary condition and

irreducible component.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 43: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

Lemma (Two-block dynamics)

Update L1 at rate 1 conditionally on the irreducible component induced

by ηL2\L1 and similarly for L2. The relaxation time of this chain is at

most (2/q)CR .

L1 L2

Couple two copies of the chain, by asking to get the most • possiblenext to the middle in R consecutive alternating updates.

Couple the parts when they have identical boundary condition and

irreducible component.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 44: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

Thank you.

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

Page 45: Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models

East & classical two-block dynamicsGeneral KCM & new two-block dynamics

SettingResultIdea

?

Ivailo Hartarsky Bisection for Kinetically Constrained Models